Hunger pangs became a constant, unwelcome companion for Tibor “Ted” Rubin.The 13-year-old Hungarian boy’s empty stomach wasn’t the worst of it, either. Held in the notorious Mauthausen Concentration Camp (“where murder was a way of life”) in Austria during World War II, Rubin battled disease and ungodly treatment. The conditions were filthy and crowded, and simply surviving became Rubin’s daily mission.Also Read: Meet the one-legged spy who helped rid the world of the Nazis“We had nothing to look forward to but dying,” Rubin recalled.Many—including some of Rubin’s family members—did not escape the Holocaust. Rubin endured 14 months at Mauthausen and wasn’t sure how much longer he was going to live until the United States Army arrived. The 11th Armored Division liberated Rubin and the other emaciated survivors in May 1945, shortly before V-E Day.Although severely weakened, Rubin was so grateful to the soldiers who rescued him that he vowed to enlist in the U.S. Army one day. Joining the Army Tibor ‘Ted’ Rubin served 30 months in a POW camp during the Korean War. (U.S. Army) After arriving in New York in 1948, Rubin fulfilled that promise.After flunking the Army entrance exam twice because of his rudimentary English skills, he tried again and finally passed it. Rubin’s military service was nothing short of extraordinary. Part of Company I, 3rd Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Cavalry Division, Rubin served during the Korean War from July 23, 1950, to April 20, 1953, according to his Medal of Honor citation.Rubin’s heroism revealed itself first as his unit retreated to the Pusan Perimeter, the citation said. Told to keep an important road open single-handedly so his regiment could escape, Rubin did more than that. He fended out the approaching North Korean forces, feverishly doing whatever he could to outsmart them.“I ran from one foxhole to the next, throwing hand grenades so the North Koreans would think they were fighting more than one person,” Rubin later told the Army. “I couldn’t think straight. In a situation like that, you become hysterical trying to save your life.”The rifleman “inflicted a staggering number of casualties on the attacking force,” according to Rubin’s citation. Later on, Rubin was credited with helping detain several hundred enemy troops before he valiantly fought Chinese service members during a nighttime attack in Unsan, North Korea. His heroism came at great personal risk. The Chinese wounded Rubin badly and captured him and other Army soldiers.Rubin was a prisoner again. What Made Rubin a Hero United Nations soldiers from the 27th US Infantry await North Korean attacks across the Naktong River from positions on the Pusan Perimeter, September 1950. (U.S. Army) Rubin spent the next 30 months of the war at a camp ominously nicknamed “Death Valley.” At least he had one thing in his favor. He considered his captors, compared to the Nazis, relatively lenient and perhaps not as observant.Rubin used that to his advantage. Much like he did at Mauthausen—when he surreptitiously picked through garbage for scraps of food—Rubin snuck away in search of nourishment for himself and the other prisoners of war. He broke into supplies of food and raided gardens, taking away as much as he could conceal.That’s not all Rubin did.“I once saw him spend the whole night picking lice off a guy who didn’t have the strength to lift his head,” said Sgt. Leo Cormier, another prisoner. “What man would do that? I’d have told him to go down and soak in the cold water so the lice would all fall off. But Ted did things for his fellow men that made him a hero in my book.”Cormier credited Rubin with saving his life. He wasn’t the only one. Rubin also fed another POW close to death goat droppings and told him they were medicine, the National World War II Museum reported. The severely ill prisoner believed him and recovered.Perhaps most importantly, Rubin’s uplifting voice encouraged his fellow POWs when there was little reason to hope. Rubin’s Medal of Honor citation credited him with saving the lives of up to 40 prisoners.Rubin’s captors released him as part of a prisoner exchange in early 1953. The Long Wait Was Finally Over Fifty-two years after the Korean War ended, Tibor ‘Ted’ Rubin receives the Medal of Honor on September 23, 2005. (U.S. Army) Rubin’s path to receiving the Medal of Honor—not for one specific action but rather the totality of his service—was an arduous one.Other service members put Rubin’s name up for nomination for the U.S. military’s highest award for valor four times. Antisemitism played a role in the rejection of previous nominations. That changed with the 2002 National Defense Authorization Act, which included a provision to review the war records of Jewish and Hispanic American personnel.Rubin was one of those veterans whose records earned another look. This time, Rubin, who already received the Prisoner of War Medal and two Purple Hearts, was deemed worthy of the Medal of Honor. President George W. Bush presented it to him on September 23, 2005.It was undoubtedly a proud day for Rubin, but not his proudest. In his mind, nothing beat the moment 52 years earlier when he took the oath to become an American.“When I became a citizen, it was one of the happiest days in my life,” Rubin said. “I think about the United States, and I am a lucky person to live here. When I came to America, it was the first time I was free.”Rubin died on December 5, 2015, at the age of 86. Don’t Miss the Best of We Are The Mighty • That time Neil Armstrong survived ejecting from his fighter jet in Korea• The combat jumps of the 187th Airborne Regimental Combat Team in Korea• What John Glenn did to save his famous wingman’s life in Korea Featured Medal of Honor How a Holocaust survivor saved 40 POWs in Korea By Stephen Ruiz Mighty MilSpouse The mental health crisis of military-connected families and the system that doesn’t protect us By Sara Jane Ginn Weapons Why miniguns like the M134 can fire thousands of rounds per minute and not jam By Adam Gramegna Feature The 5 most important lessons about lethality via historical quotes Marine Corps and Army Special Forces veteran "Rusty Dusty" Medal of Honor Two legendary Vietnam War Marines and a GWOT Green Beret received the Medal of Honor By Miguel Ortiz The post How a Holocaust survivor saved 40 POWs in Korea appeared first on We Are The Mighty.

One of the most difficult conversations within the military-connected community is the intersection of long-term military service, trauma, and personality traits that can become increasingly destructive within families. For some military spouses, the challenge is multi-tiered and complex. Their service member may have struggled with post-traumatic stress, depression, anxiety, or alcohol misuse. It is living with a partner whose years of authority, rank, and institutional power have reinforced unhealthy patterns of control, entitlement, and emotional manipulation. Sadly, this has become more and more of the norm in today’s military community.Read: Mental Health and the Military Spouse: what spouses are really thinking Military culture often rewards confidence, decisiveness, self-reliance, and mission focus. These qualities are essential for leadership and operational success because this is precisely how service members stick out from others—direct communication with no room for error. “It never works out very well when I remind my dad I’m not a soldier.” Yet in some, those same characteristics can evolve into something far more damaging at home. Spouses may describe a family environment where criticism or voicing opposition is met with rage, concerns are dismissed, accountability is avoided, and every conflict somehow becomes someone else’s fault with zero ownership or responsibility for the needless escalation. Additionally, when narcissistic traits are present, the impact on families can be profound.Children may learn to suppress their own needs to avoid conflict. Spouses may begin questioning their own judgment after years of being told their experiences are inaccurate or exaggerated. Family members can become isolated, emotionally exhausted, and fearful of challenging the narrative created and maintained by the service member. The danger is when you begin to feel insignificant, undervalued, and start to believe that you are of no value.“It never works out very well when I remind my dad I’m not a soldier,” on teenage military child of an active duty service member said during a recent Student2Student training. “I’ve said this to him a couple of times when he’s raging over little things like leaving the kitchen cabinet door open or not taking the trash out fast enough. Being on your own time table can’t exist in our house without some type of punishment. We [mom and siblings] just live a separate life and stay small around my dad. It’s more peaceful.”What makes these situations particularly difficult is that highly functioning individuals can be skilled at manipulation, gaslighting, and constructing a reality with the expectation for everyone to operate which continues to gratify and feed the very person that deteriorates the family unit. A service member may be respected by peers, admired by subordinates, and praised by leadership while family members experience a very different reality behind closed doors. The truth is that exposure is a way out. But what follows can prove to be very dangerous.In these circumstances, spouses often encounter a system that is designed to evaluate performance, discipline, and mission readiness—not necessarily patterns of mental and emotional abuse or coercive control. Concerns raised by family members may be viewed as marital conflict rather than indicators of a deeper problem. And our system has failed us all by not providing help before the service member separates and begins to transition into the civilian world. This only adds to the danger.Ultimately, the result is a painful disconnect. The institution sees a successful officer, senior NCO, or leader. The family sees someone whose untreated trauma, reinforced authority, and narcissistic behaviors have created an environment of fear, instability, or emotional harm.Conversations like this seem to be recurrent in different military-connected professional and social circles.“One of my best friends is going through it, and has been going through it for almost five years. Her spouse is an active duty military police officer with multiple deployments, schools, tons of leadership training and command time with allegations of rape, physical abuse, child neglect, and endangerment. We’re retired now, but this story seems to be more of the norm because I keep hearing the recklessness that breaks loose leading up to or shortly post separation or retirement from a career in the military.”How can we protect the institution and solidarity of the military family that includes the service member, spouse and children? A proactive system that invests in the mental health and wellness of every family member would be a damn good start. Brokenness splinters and infects.The message in italics found below was received by a recently divorced military spouse of 20-plus years to an active duty Army officer. The message was in response from the company commander to the former spouse as a follow-up communication from a 3.5 month internal command investigation of allegations for ongoing harassment, safety concerns, trespassing, and bullying: “Good morning Ma’am, The investigation has concluded. Unless you or your children are in physical danger there is nothing I can do.” This came despite pages of thoroughly abundant text message threats captured by screenshot, audio recordings of explicit language and name calling in front of their young children, a parent alienation video with young son having a conversation about “who would cheat on who—mama or papa” led by the service member. There were also multiple letters of support from the local community (to include their parish priest). The spouse in question did not have healthcare for five months because the service member provided DEERS with only the divorce decree and failed to maintain 20/20/20 for healthcare through court order. The service member also provided the spouses’ banking information without authorization to mortgage company, while having an extramarital romantic relationship with a JAG officer within command. The list goes on. The investigation provided zero accountability or recourse for the service member. Nada. Zip. Zilch. Nothing. Why, one might ask? More than likely because the service member is set to retire in October and the Army will not take the time or energy to rehabilitate which leaves not only the service member at risk, but the entire family at an elevated risk because of the lack of support and resources post-military separation.Not today. Once a military spouse, always a military spouse because we’ve lived a thousand lives and will continue to press on because, ironically enough, living the military spouse life positions us to live independently—and thrive, because there’s nothing we haven’t done, can’t or won’t do to create a safe place for our children and shared community.  “The investigation provided zero accountability or recourse for the service member. “ Examples like these are where the military’s mental health conversation must evolve. Trauma and post-traumatic stress deserve attention, treatment, and compassion. But trauma alone cannot explain every harmful behavior. A comprehensive approach must also address accountability, emotional abuse, unhealthy power dynamics, substance misuse, and personality patterns that place spouses and children at risk.Supporting military families requires acknowledging a difficult truth that military service can wound the individual, but those wounds can also ripple outward and affect everyone who loves them. Compassion for the service member and protection for the family are not competing priorities. A healthy system must be capable of doing both.Join us on June 23, 2026 from 12pm to 1:30pm to Continue the Conversation in “Mental Health and the Military Spouse” Workshop facilitated by Angelina “Strike” Stephens, and hosted by We Are the Mighty’s MightyMilSpouse & MilSpouseFest. Register today through this registration link: Meeting Registration – Zoom  If you’re a present or former military spouse, active, guard, reserve, or retired/veteran, you are invited to Continue the Conversation through this workshop-style event that will give you space to discuss mental health as a military spouse, provide tools and resources to help build a foundation to prioritize your mental health, and join an impact session to identity the top 10 changes you want to see. The findings will be published and shared with change agents in military and veteran communities. Don’t Miss the Best of We Are The Mighty •The invisible weight of loving a service member while protecting yourself• 7 hard truths military spouses wish they knew in the beginning• ‘The weight he carried’: Memorial Day and the battle at home Mighty MilSpouse Mighty MilSpouse The mental health crisis of military-connected families and the system that doesn’t protect us By Sara Jane Ginn Mighty MilSpouse Mental Health and the Military Spouse: What spouses are really thinking By Angelina "Strike" Stephens Kids & Family Free, flexible ideas to keep military kids engaged this summer By Daniella Horne Mighty MilSpouse 7 hacks for the hard truths about raising kids in a dual-military household By Tamika Sherman Mighty MilSpouse 5 sneaky habits wrecking military family mental health (and nobody talks about) By Tamika Sherman The post The mental health crisis of military-connected families and the system that doesn’t protect us appeared first on We Are The Mighty.

The M-134 “minigun” does not sound like a gun, really. A rifle pops and a machine gun thumps, but the thing rips. One long, flat, ripping note with no gaps in it; like reality being unzipped, ending in a solid rope of tracer where a target used to be. Its report lands in your sternum before your ears catch up. If you have ever stood near one, you did not hear shots as much as feel them.Read Next: Your standard rifle can now be an anti-drone weapon. Seriously. Humans have been arguing this question for longer than 160 years; why fire from one barrel when you can fire six? It’s an excellent question, too; a similar question was probably grunted by our legendary ancestors, who instead asked why throw one rock at that creature’s head when you can throw six? Or 6,000.Some will say this is simply a story about a gun; however, it is a story about family, a bloodline of spinning-barrel weapons across three centuries, and the trait that runs through all of them. They refuse to quit. They refuse, specifically, to do the thing every other gun on earth can do at the worst possible moment. They refuse to jam. Dr. Gatling’s Rapid-Firing Invention A Gatling gun set up outside Santiago, Cuba, during the Spanish-American War of 1898. (National Archives) It starts, like so many of these stories, with a man who thought he was saving lives. Dr. Richard Gatling patented his gun on Nov. 4, 1862, in the middle of the Civil War, after watching trainloads of soldiers die, most of them not from bullets but from disease, infection, and exposure on the way to the fight.His logic, written down years later, was dark, but almost tender: if one man with the right machine could do the battle duty of a hundred, armies could shrink, and fewer men would have to die. He was wise, but unbelievably wrong about the dying part.What he built was six barrels around a central shaft, fed by gravity from a hopper and spun by a hand crank, throwing around 200 rounds a minute when a good soldier managed five. The hand-crank era faded once single-barreled guns like the Maxim did the same job on their own. It didn’t really make a difference in the Civil War, but the idea didn’t die.It would slumber for half a century. Project Vulcan By the time the United States entered the war in Vietnam, machine guns had already made their mark on modern warfare and jet engines changed the tempo of combat. Aircraft had gotten so fast that a single-barrel cannon could not fling bullets quickly enough to catch them in the half-second they stayed in your sights.By June 1946, the Army had handed General Electric a contract for Project Vulcan, Gatling’s old idea rebuilt for the jet age. GE soldered an electric motor where the hand crank used to be and let it run. A U.S. Air Force Sikorsky HH-53E helicopter crewman fires an M134 mini-gun during rescue patrol over South Vietnam. (U.S. Air Force/Staff Sgt. Paul Hagerty) After years of prototypes in ridiculous calibers, the 20mm version was standardized in 1956 as the M61 Vulcan, a six-barrel cannon firing up to 6,000 rounds a minute.It first went to war in April 1965 in the nose of an F-105 Thunderchief over Vietnam, and some version still rides in the F-15, the F-16, the F-22, and the Navy’s F/A-18. This is the weapon that owns the name. When you hear the word”Vulcan,” they’re either talking about “Star Trek” or this 20mm cannon. Putting the “Mini” in “Minigun” GE would go on to build a smaller one, accidentally creating a masterpiece. When helicopters started getting shot down over Vietnam, the military needed a gun light enough to hang in a door and fast enough to saturate a treeline. GE took the 20mm Vulcan and shrank it to fire the 7.62mm rifle round.They called it the Minigun, “mini” because it was the little brother of the 20mm cannon and “gun” because it fired rifle bullets instead of cannon shells. Designated the M134 and the GAU-17/A in Navy and special operations hands, it ended up on Huey door mounts, on the AC-47 gunships nicknamed “Spooky” and “Puff the Magic Dragon,” and on the riverine boats.To the men underneath it, the minigun was that tearing sound and the rope of red light. It never really retired either. Dillon Aero builds a modern titanium version today. The Big Boys Staff Sgt. Sharane Watson reloads the General Electric GAU/8 Avenger 30mm hydraulically driven seven-barrel autocannon of an A-10 Thunderbolt II at Kandahar Airfield, Afghanistan May 20, 2018. (U.S. Air Force/Staff Sgt. Corey Hook) The bloodline branched, and some of the children grew up farm strong. The biggest is the GAU-8 Avenger, the 30mm seven-barrel cannon in the nose of the A-10 Thunderbolt II (the “Warthog”), source of the most beloved noise in close air support, the angry “BRRRRRT” that means somebody is contemplating the life choices that led up to that moment.From it came the 25mm Equalizer on the Harrier and the AC-130, and from that the four-barrel GAU-22 inside the F-35, which carries the family’s most embarrassing chapter: the most expensive fighter ever built had a gun that could not shoot straight for years, firing rounds at about $131 apiece, roughly twenty-three grand to fill the magazine.Then there is the cousin shaped like a hastily built R2D2. The Phalanx is an M61 bolted to its own radar and told to do its own thing, the last line against an incoming missile at sea and, as the land-based Centurion C-RAM, a gun that hurls 4,500 rounds a minute at rockets and mortars. Why the M134 Doesn’t Jam A normal gun runs on the violence of its own ammunition. The gas or recoil of each fired round works the action and chambers the next one, so a single bad round, a dud or a misfeed, can stop the whole machine cold. The rotary gun does not care, because it is driven from the outside. An electric motor spins the barrels and works the firing cycle, whether the ammunition cooperates or not. Hand it a dud and the barrel rotates on, spits it out, and keeps going. A Swedish special boat unit operator fires the M134 minigun during recent a night fire training scenario. (U.S. Navy/Michael Williams) Six barrels also split the heat and the wear that would warp a single one. Now the honest part, because we are not in the myth business: it is not that these guns cannot fail. It is that they are gloriously indifferent to what can choke an ordinary weapon. Runaway guns and stoppages still happen. None of this is free, of course. A gun firing 6,000 rounds a minute eats 100 every second, so trigger time on a fighter is measured not in magazines but in seconds. Hold it down, and a belt worth more than your car is gone before you finish the thought. What’s Old Is New Again For a while, the smart money wrote off the whole clan. Missiles took over air defense, the Army retired its M163 Vulcan air-defense vehicles, and the A-10 has been dodging the undertaker for a decade.Then came the drones, and the math flipped. You cannot trade million-dollar interceptors against thousand-dollar drones forever, so a cheap wall of lead is the economical answer again.Through 2025, American bases leaned on Phalanx and Land Phalanx Gatling guns to swat drones out of the sky, and the 2026 budget points toward $7.5 billion for counter-drones. Israel has looked at reviving its old M61 air-defense guns. Poland rolled out a four-barrel .50-caliber rotary gun running 3,600 rounds a minute after a Russian drone wandered into its airspace.A Danish company is building, with a completely straight face, a Gatling-style rotary shotgun that throws 3,000 shells a minute at incoming drones. Richard Gatling would understand every bit of it. Throw enough barrels at the problem, and the problem goes away. U.S. Marine Corps Sgt. Gage Garcheau engages a target with a M134 GAU-17/A minigun during Exercise Cold Response 2022. (U.S. Marine Corps/Sgt. Jonathon Wiederhold) While the idea gets measured for a coffin about once a generation, and every time it walks back out of the funeral home. A hand crank in 1862. An electric motor in 1956. A radar and a brain in a trash can on a destroyer. A shotgun pointed at robots in 2026.One stubborn idea to rule them all, one a doctor sketched while watching boys die of fever. Many barrels, one purpose, and a straight-up refusal to quit on you when the round in the chamber turns out to be junk. Other guns promise they will work. One day, the last of the Gatling family will fall silent; it will not be today, and probably not tomorrow. Don’t Miss the Best of We Are The Mighty • The grunt’s 250-year quest for a weapon that actually works• American civilians donated personal weapons to the British during World War II• Ukraine’s new drone weapon is basically a penis-shaped claymore Weapons Weapons Why miniguns like the M134 can fire thousands of rounds per minute and not jam By Adam Gramegna Weapons The Navy ordered $23.4M of hypersonic missiles to be launched from drones By Miguel Ortiz Weapons Ruger moved from Connecticut to North Carolina and didn’t tell anyone By Miguel Ortiz Weapons The Marines and the rare rifles you didn’t know were at D-Day By Miguel Ortiz Firearms Green Beret says SOCOM’s hypervelocity rifle will kill SIG M7 rifle By Miguel Ortiz The post Why miniguns like the M134 can fire thousands of rounds per minute and not jam appeared first on We Are The Mighty.

More than 80 years after its sinking, long-buried documents in both the American and Japanese archives held the key to locating the seemingly lost location of the Japanese “Hell ship” Hōfuku Maru. Now, explorer Josh Gates, working with the Hellships Memorial Foundation, is taking viewers along for that historic journey in an all-new season of Expedition Unknown.The first episode of the two-hour event premieres on Wednesday, June 24, at 9 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on the Discovery Channel. On Sept. 21, 1944, the Hōfuku Maru, alongside 10 other ships forming Convoy MATA-27, was transporting more than 1,000 Allied Dutch and British service members when it was sunk by American planes. Among combatants on both sides, the Japanese alone refused to guarantee the safety of POWs at sea or mark their prisoner transports. Friendly fire accounted for a staggering 93% of the POW deaths on these ships, according to Gregory Michno, author of Death on the Hellships.According to historian David Aquila, to add to the sheer terror of the experience, by 1944 these hell ships were carrying prisoners in numbers six times greater than what the Japanese had deemed acceptable at the beginning of the war. This practice, called chomansai, or super-full capacity, gave each man less than one square yard of space for voyages that lasted up to 70 days. The crowded, disease-ridden conditions, says historian Gavin Daws, were comparable to those on the slave ships of the 18th century.One of the few survivors of the Hōfuku Maru sinking, Capt. Nigel Evans, later testified in British war crimes trials held in Singapore shortly after war’s end. “Conditions on board became terrible,” Evans said. “It was a common sight to see prisoners of war eating their meals within six feet of a corpse being prepared for burial. On the day before we sailed, over a third of officers and men were unable to walk unassisted and there were a number of mental cases.” Evans survived the sinking by boarding another Japanese ship and was taken to a POW camp in Taiwan. By the end of the war, conservative estimates suggest that 50,000 Allied POWs boarded hell ships, and 21,000 of those men did not survive. That tally accounts for more deaths, according to Michno, than were sustained in combat by the U.S. Marines during the entire Pacific campaign.The sinking of the Hōfuku Maru that September day marks one of the largest single-day losses of Allied POW lives. Struck by an Allied torpedo, the vessel was split in half and went under the water in less than three minutes. More than 1,000 Allied POWs were still trapped in its hold. Due to incorrect U.S. records of the event, searchers were led too far north for decades. That is until researcher John Duresky of the Hellships Memorial Foundation and historian Tim Beckensall stumbled upon a digitized Japanese after-action report written by officers on board the convoy’s lead ship. It contained a hand-drawn account detailing the location of each ship within the convoy and a note stating that the Hōfuku Maru sunk at 10:35 a.m.But the revelations didn’t stop there. Hidden in plain sight was an aerial photograph captured by the lead American Curtiss SB2C Helldiver just moments before the attack. “This is what they refer to in the business, guys, as a smoking gun,” says Gates.“We were absolutely stunned that Japanese sources had information on where the convoy was attacked and what ships were hit,” says researcher Randy Anderson. Beckensall shared his archival findings with the British Embassy, then the Dutch and Philippine military attachés.After the compelling evidence, the Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands agreed to fund an initial sonar survey and a preliminary dive mission to the site, which took place this past December and January, CNN reports. But the dive mission initially hit a snag. Despite divers finding some kind of wreckage that pointed to the Hōfuku Maru, the 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo and the subsequent flood of volcanic ash threatened to engulf the wreck. With the help of Calvin Mires, a maritime archaeologist for Marine Imaging Technologies, and Evan Kovacs, an underwater imaging specialist, hundreds of images were taken of the wreck and then turned into a 3D model via a technique known as photogrammetry.Mires and Gates have dived the wreck several times, reporting that they encountered human remains on the deck. Neither went into the holds. “This ship is a grave, and now that she’s been identified, the governments of the UK, the Netherlands, and the United States have been notified, and they’ll determine the next course of action,” Gates told CNN.Using “a combination of navigation analyses and archival, cartographic, and archaeological evidence,” the Cultural Heritage Agency of the Netherlands confirmed on June 8 that the vessel is “most likely” the Hōfuku Maru.“The pieces all fit,” states Beckensall in the release. “The vessel is the right size, in the right place and from the correct period. I am convinced this is the Hōfuku Maru.”

When the sound of a gunshot pierced the lively hum of a crowded motorcade more than 60 years ago, Clint Hill threw himself across the bodies of President John F. Kennedy and Jacqueline Kennedy.The former Secret Service Agent, whose actions became a defining part of that fatal Dallas day, was laid to rest this week at Arlington National Cemetery — the same burial ground as President Kennedy — with military honors. Hill was 93 when he passed away Feb. 21, 2025, according to the United States Secret Service Association. Hill was drafted and served three years in the Army Counterintelligence Corps before he was sworn in as a Secret Service agent in 1958. He went on to work as an agent under five presidents, including Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower, Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. He was awarded the Treasury Department’s highest civilian award for bravery and Jacqueline Kennedy personally requested that Hill remain a member of her security team after the assassination, accompanying her from the fated limousine to the hospital and eventually to the president’s funeral at Arlington National Cemetery. When the North Dakota native retired, Hill had climbed the ranks to become responsible for all Secret Service protective forces as the assistant director of protective operations. But he never forgot the moment that a second bullet barreled into President Kennedy’s head, killing him. Though he progressed in his career, Hill sunk into depression and was tormented with post-traumatic stress, self-doubt and guilt. He retired from the service in 1975 at the advice of medical professionals. Hill later said that he spent the seven years after his retirement, which was at the age of 43, sequestered away from the world.“Nobody talked about PTSD. There was no counseling for guys like me,” Hill said in a quote from the cemetery’s Thursday release. “Now when I talk to groups or people struggling with trauma, I tell them to find somebody they can talk to,” he said, adding “no matter how old you are, talking about it will help.”Hill worked with journalist Lisa McCubbin on four different books and the pair eventually married in 2021. McCubbin Hill said the couple chose the national burial ground because “it gave him a lot of peace,” to be laid to rest where he stood decades before at President Kennedy’s funeral. Mourners placed their hands on his urn in farewell. After Hill’s ceremony and service, his wife and her family visited President Kennedy’s gravesite. “It feels full circle,” she said.