While I agree, considering this ruling, The Griswold v. Connecticut has to go back to the states as well. I don't agree with re-opening Lawrence v. Texas. Obergefell v. Hodges should be looked at again because every religion...including the ones this country was built on state that marriage is between a man and a woman. Am I wrong?


"Justice Clarence Thomas says the Supreme Court should reconsider rulings that currently protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage.
Thus, Thomas said, the court should examine other landmark cases that fall under the court's previous due process precedents, "including Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell."
The Griswold v. Connecticut decision in 1965 said people had the right to privacy granted by the Bill of Rights that protects against state restrictions on contraception. If overturned, states would be granted the ability to outlaw various forms of birth control.
The Lawrence v. Texas ruling in 2003 said that making it a crime for members of the same sex from having intimate sexual relations violated the due process clause.
The Obergefell v. Hodges decision in 2015 said the due process clause protected the rights of same-sex couples to get married in the same ways as opposite-sex couples."

https://www.newsmax.com/politi....cs/justice-clarence-