Two Americas, Two Stories, One Obamacare Fight

Exploring the contrasting narratives surrounding the Obamacare subsidy debate.

Do we need another example to show how far apart our media worlds are? Let's flip the spotlight on the latest Obamacare fight.

The BBC made it sound as if America was on the edge of a cliff after the Senate "failed" to extend enhanced subsidies. The scene comes into focus as sirens in the background nearly drown out warnings of soaring premiums, crushing families under impossible bills.

Advertisement

The left treated the gridlock like a national emergency rather than a policy fight between grown adults. Well, between grown adults and petulant toddlers. The Beeb's reporting followed that pattern from the moment they posted their article.

Healthcare subsidies for millions of Americans appear likely to expire after the Senate failed to pass competing bills, a politically fraught issue ahead of next year's midterm elections.

Both Democratic and Republican plans fell short of the 60 votes needed to advance, meaning insurance premiums through the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, are on course to more than double at the end of the year.

Opinion polls show that a vast majority of Americans favour extending the subsidy, with the cost of living a major concern for voters.

The issue has caused a rift among Republicans, with healthcare poised to emerge as a hot issue in next year's congressional elections.

More than 24 million people have health insurance through Obamacare.

It's a familiar-feeling tone, when every setback the left feels is tied to Obamacare becomes the end of days. Every delay signals a moral failure by anyone who refuses to rubber-stamp new spending.

Shockingly, they left half the story out while acting like the Senate had one job and blew it! They ignored every conservative argument against temporary subsidies, which never fix real costs, while ignoring the inflationary effect that many conservative economists point out. The BBC never missed a chance to blame Republicans for Washington gridlock, yet they avoided explaining why Democrats rely on constant expansions to keep the law from wobbling.

Advertisement

While the BBC, among several lefty outlets, warned of an oncoming storm, conservative outlets took a different approach. They looked at the same information and saw a bloated program in need of repair.

Fox News reminded readers that enhanced subsidies helped hide rising costs rather than address them, laying out how many Republicans want a system that sends help to families rather than padding insurance companies' revenue.

...arguing that those subsidies are fuel on the fire of higher healthcare premiums.

What the Biden COVID credit did was make the situation worse in two ways: They shifted a portion of the premium away from the enrollees to the taxpayer, and they brought more people into the subsidy structure by lifting the cap at four times the poverty line, Brian Blase, president of Paragon Health Institute, told Fox News Digital.

So if the underlying ObamaCare subsidies were inflationary, then the Biden enhancements to it just pour fuel on that underlying inflationary structure.

This framing stood miles apart from the BBC's panic. Conservatives argue that leaders need a long-term plan, not another extension that delays an overdue fix, and point to fraud concerns raised by several watchdogs.

The Washington Examiner reported that many on the right highlight waste and abuse in the program while Democrats push for a clean renewal without explaining how they plan to prevent those problems.

Senate Democrats are pushing for a show vote, expected on Thursday, on a “clean” three-year extension of the subsidies, meaning the bill does not include structural changes to the program to avoid the insurance affordability cliff for the nearly 24 million enrollees.

However, Republicans and right-leaning health economists have argued for months that the premium tax credits, which are paid to insurance companies to offset patient costs, are ripe for waste, fraud, and abuse. 

This month’s new GAO audit of the Obamacare program outlined how the agency obtained subsidized plans for 23 out of 24 fictitious applications using fake Social Security numbers, amounting to a more than 90% failure rate in existing fraud detection systems. 

Four of the fake accounts established for plan year 2024 were each paid $2,350 per month for subsidized Obamacare insurance, totaling roughly $113,000 for the year. The GAO did not provide cost estimates for the 18 other fake accounts that were paid in 2025, because the year is not yet over. 

Advertisement

Two narratives fight for attention: One side sells chaos, the other pushes reform. One side warns that failing to pass a bill could wreck household budgets, while the other points to the quiet truth that Obamacare costs climbed for years, even with the blessed subsidies.

Conservatives have said that the temporary boost never fixed the core problem, and they want a system that encourages competition rather than relying on emergency patches, an argument that rarely finds space in the left's coverage.

The left would rather treat reformers like arsonists than acknowledge that skyrocketing costs existed long before the Senate's vote. The louder the panic grows, the more people notice what's going on, hearing one crowd screaming at the sky and another trying to explain why a rushed extension helps no one. All they hear are Republicans talking about affordability, inflation, and long-term fixes, while listening to Democrats defend a program that is constantly in need of rescue.

It's a contrast that grows clearer each time the media reacts with fear instead of fact.

The Senate vote exposed more than policy differences; it exposed two worlds that no longer describe America in the same way. One world acts like every conservative delay carries ruin, while the other world sees a moment to fix what went wrong years ago.

The gap between them widens because there's only one side that demands honest math.

If you want coverage that cuts through media panic and reaches the truth behind Washington fights, join PJ Media VIP and support writers who call out fear-mongering.

Get deeper insight, member podcasts, and full access that helps you stay ahead of national debates. Sign up with promo code FIGHT.


David Manney

149 Blog posts

Comments