Are the E. Jean Carroll Lawsuits a RICO Case?

The mainstream news media reported ad nauseam (seemingly with glee) how President Donald Trump lost his appeal yesterday in his E. Jean Carroll cases and now must pay her the $83.3 million she was awarded by lower New York courts. This matter will now be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower courts yesterday. The decision relates to 2 separate cases of the alleged sexual abuse in a dressing room by Trump against Carroll and the case of alleged defamation of Carroll by Trump. These cases were decided in a lower court in an 8 to 2 decision prior. The mainstream media was quick to point out the names of the 2 dissenters as appointed by Trump but were less forthcoming about the others who we can assume are all New York Democrats.

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act is a United States federal law that provides for extended criminal penalties and a civil cause of action for acts performed as part of an ongoing criminal organization. In looking at all of the New York Democrats who seemingly have organized to assist E. Jean Carroll in her rape case of President Donald Trump, one could ask;

Why isn’t the Department of Justice (DOJ) now pursuing RICO charges against all of those involved from New York Governor Kathy Hochul all the way down to the juries? There are 35 different RICO violations and several that seem to apply to the treatment of President Donald Trump in these E. Jean Carroll cases would be those related to fraud and obstruction of justice. We could also add election interference, given the timing of this litigation.

Let’s take a look at all of the actions that seemingly should make the hunters of President Donald Trump become the hunted of the Trump DOJ. The following is taken from multiple sources all over the internet since the first trial concluded with the settlement awarded for supposed sexual assault in a department store dressing room. It is assumed to now be common knowledge and true.

New York Democrats created a temporary (one year) law “The Adult Survivors Act” 11/24/2022 to enable the E. Jean Carroll lawsuit to proceed after the statute of limitations had run out over 23 years. (There is evidence she knew about this prior indicating this was an orchestrated pre-conceived attack on President Trump as her suit was filed that day.)
During trial she couldn’t recall the date, month, year or even season the alleged assault happened. (Most true sexual assault victims remember the smallest of details unless they were mentally impaired.)
During trial she admitted she never told anyone about the alleged assault, despite being publically obsessed with her own sexuality.
The dress she claimed to be wearing the day of the alleged assault didn’t exist yet.
Her description of the dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman, where the alleged assault took place, was inaccurate making her description of the alleged assault impossible.
Those who have shopped Bergdorf Goodman say that the way sales staff monitor shoppers in the store, the assault Carroll testified to would be impossible.
Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffery Epstein (and Nikki Haley) pal Democrat mega donor Reid Hoffman. (Hoffman bankrolled Haley to run against Trump.)
Her accusation of the Trump sexual assault was the exact same plotline as a past episode of the television show “Law and Order” (one of her admitted “favorite shows”.)
She once posted to social media about having sex with Donald Trump when another one of her favorite shows, “The Apprentice” was on starring Donald Trump.
She has accused multiple men prior of sexual assault including a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, a college date, a former boss, and Les Moonves the CBS CEO at the time.
She told CNN’s Anderson Cooper, “most people think of rape as being sexy.” Cooper became noticeably uncomfortable and cut to commercial.
She made a career promoting promiscuity including writing glowingly about sexual assault.
The name of her cat is/was “Vagina”.

Average moderate Americans see and know what is going on and they are speaking up about the problem of injustice in America’s judicial branch of government as noted here.

President Trump is appealing the absurd E. Jean Carroll verdict against him, where she won without presenting any substantial evidence.
As a reminder, E. Jean Carroll is a self-identified serial r*pe victim. She claims to have been raped by multiple men over the years, including…
— Portland Moderate. (@pdxmoderate) September 9, 2025

One of the most interesting interviews ever seen was provided by the Valuetainment podcast interview of Donald Trump attorney Alina Habba last year. Patrick Bet-David, Adam Sosnick, Tom Ellsworth, and Vincent Oshana were joined by attorney Alina Habba where they discussed the $18.3 million in compensatory damages and $65 million in punitive damages awarded to E. Jean Carroll in the Donald Trump defamation case.

What was so revealing in this interview was how the judge in the case improperly denied Habba her own First Amendment right to free speech preventing her from offering evidence from being heard in the Trump trial. The judge undermined Trump’s defense before the jury even saw the relative evidence.

“’The Mouse House’ – Donald Trump Accuser E. Jean Carroll Gives Bizarre Tour of Home” – Valuetainment

[embedded content]

As a result President Trump was to be found guilty before the trial even started. The Jury only heard what Carroll’s side and a New York judge wanted them to hear. The judge NEVER allowed Trump’s lawyers to present relevant evidence to disprove Carroll’s inconsistencies, questionable personality traits, and outright lies that would have exonerated Trump.

In summation these trials were a sham. President Trump was denied due process. The court’s award was excessive and a violation of President Trump’s 8^th Amendment right under the Constitution.

According to Google AI:

“The Eighth Amendment prohibits the government from requiring excessive bail, imposing excessive fines, or inflicting cruel and unusual punishments.”

CONCLUSION:

Everyone should be very concerned of what is being allowed to happen to President Trump, whether you like the man or not. If they can do this to him, they can do this to anyone. President Trump has termed this un-American form of abuse “lawfare”.

I call it stalking and harassment for purposes of extortion and/or manipulation by litigation. Multiple people have hypothesized President Donald Trump could have avoided all of these court cases if he had just not run for the presidency a second time. Indeed, most of these cases were filed after his announcement to run again for a second term!

If real American justice were served in this case, E. Jean Carrol and all involved as well as other cases involving President Trump would be arrested and in prison for RICO violations.

President Trump is a better man than I am. I think he keeps asking the question, “What would Jesus do?”, when he is wronged by others.

I keep asking, “What would our forefathers do?”, which would not be at all what Jesus would do!

There was a recent article in the news how some Federal justices now fear for their lives. If they are following a hidden agenda rather than the Constitution and the law of the land, they should be! Perhaps they have the ghosts of our forefathers coming to mind?

Attorney Alina Habba concludes: “E. Jean Carroll is not going to receive a dollar, and then we are going to counter sue her. This story is far from over.”