Karl Rove is warning Republicans that even Texas—long treated like safe ground—could slip in 2026 if Latino support keeps sliding. Rove’s Texas Warning Puts the Senate Map Back in Play Karl Rove used a recent appearance on Fox News’ Journal Editorial Report to argue the 2026 midterms could turn on a basic problem: Republicans cannot assume Texas will hold if key voters drift away. Rove framed the state as central to keeping GOP control of the House and Senate, describing Texas as a “real mess” if current trends persist and Democratic incumbents remain difficult to dislodge. Rove’s message is not that Republicans suddenly become the minority in Texas overnight. His warning is narrower and more tactical: small shifts in turnout and persuasion in competitive districts can break a majority. When the Senate margin is tight, a single seat can decide the chamber, and Texas is no longer immune from the national push-and-pull of voter moods, issue salience, and candidate quality. Latino Support Softens in Districts Trump Barely Carried Rove highlighted South Texas districts where Trump’s 2024 margins were thin, including a corridor running from Corpus Christi to Brownsville that Trump reportedly carried by about a point. He also cited Rep. Henry Cuellar’s district, where Trump’s 2024 performance was described as a mid-single-digit win. Those numbers matter because a modest swing—driven by economic dissatisfaction, immigration messaging, or local dynamics—can flip a House seat even without a major statewide shift. The same coverage cites post-2024 polling that paints a rougher picture for Republicans with Hispanic voters. An Economist/YouGov snapshot put Trump’s approval among Hispanic respondents at 36%, with roughly 70% disapproval. Another poll discussion referenced public unease over immigration enforcement, underscoring how quickly the political ground can move when headlines focus on enforcement actions and controversies. The research does not provide a full poll crosstab, but the toplines align with Rove’s caution. Gerrymandering Isn’t a Substitute for Durable Coalitions Rove’s argument also doubles as a critique of overreliance on mapmaking. Texas Republicans benefited from redistricting advantages after the 2021 redraws, and the research notes the GOP’s long history of pushing aggressive redistricting strategies. Rove’s point, as summarized in the reporting, is that even favorable lines have limits when a party’s support in a target community declines. A shrinking coalition eventually overwhelms structural advantages, especially in fast-changing regions. For conservative voters frustrated by years of Washington overspending, inflation pressure, and the political gamesmanship that often replaces governance, the Texas conversation offers a practical takeaway: elections are won with persuasion and turnout, not just clever district boundaries. If voters believe the economy is not improving fast enough, or that the immigration debate is chaotic, they can punish incumbents regardless of which party drew the lines. The Cuellar Pardon Created New Complications in a Must-Win Area The reporting also centers on a political subplot Republicans expected to help them: President Trump’s December 2025 pardon of Rep. Henry Cuellar and his wife on bribery-related charges. According to the research summary, the pardon was followed by expectations—at least among some Republicans—that Cuellar might switch parties. Cuellar did not. That refusal matters because it kept an entrenched Democrat in place in a district Republicans viewed as increasingly reachable. Trump then moved to back Cuellar’s Republican opponent, signaling that the GOP still wants the seat. Rove’s caution, however, is that “unlikely” races remain unlikely if voter sentiment shifts the wrong way, and if incumbency advantages hold. The research does not provide fresh district polling, so the strongest available support for the warning comes from the broader Hispanic approval numbers and Rove’s on-air assessment of softness in precisely the areas Republicans need to improve. A Special Election Shock Signals Vulnerability—But Not Destiny Adding to the concern, the research cites a recent Texas state senate special election in which Democrat Taylor Rehmet won by 14 points in a district described as Trump +17. That result does not automatically translate to a general midterm environment, but it does reinforce Rove’s warning that local races can break expectations when one side is better organized, better messaged, or simply more motivated. Trump publicly downplayed the contest as a local matter. Karl Rove Warns GOP It Has to Worry About Losing the Senate in Midterms — And 'Real Mess' in Texas https://t.co/8yhg0OpvKy — Mediaite (@Mediaite) February 9, 2026 The broader midterm lesson is straightforward: Republicans cannot bank Senate control on yesterday’s coalition, and Democrats cannot bank it on Republican complacency. Rove’s warning is rooted in measurable indicators—narrow 2024 margins in South Texas districts and polling that shows steep Hispanic disapproval. If GOP leaders respond by tightening local outreach and focusing on kitchen-table concerns, Texas remains winnable; if not, the “real mess” becomes a national problem. Sources: Karl Rove Warns GOP It Has to Worry About Losing the Senate in Midterms — And ‘Real Mess’ in Texas Republican Guru Karl Rove Warns Biggest Red State Is Turning on Trump The Midterms Are Democrats’ to Lose

President Trump reignited his vision of American territorial expansion by reposting an AI-edited map showing Greenland, Canada, and Venezuela under the U.S. flag, signaling serious strategic intentions beneath what critics dismiss as trolling. Trump Revives Greenland Acquisition Push with Bold Visual Statement President Donald Trump escalated his campaign for U.S. control of Greenland by sharing an AI-manipulated image on Truth Social depicting an expanded American map. The doctored photo overlays the U.S. flag on Canada, Greenland, and Venezuela in a real August 2025 image from Trump’s meeting with European leaders. This digital provocation arrived alongside screenshots of what appeared to be private communications from world leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, asking, “I do not understand what you are doing on Greenland.” The overnight posting spree demonstrates Trump’s willingness to use unconventional methods to advance strategic objectives while keeping adversaries off-balance. National Security Justification Grounds Territorial Ambitions Trump’s interest in Greenland dates to 2019, when he first proposed purchasing the self-governing Danish territory, framing it as essential for national security and Arctic dominance. The current push revives post-World War II American strategic interests in securing military bases and natural resources in the Arctic region. Trump explicitly told Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre that he needs “Complete and Total Control of Greenland” for global security, linking his denial of the Nobel Peace Prize to reduced obligations to peaceful diplomacy. This America First approach prioritizes tangible territorial gains over globalist niceties that have traditionally constrained U.S. sovereignty and security decisions. Military Force and Economic Leverage Remain on Table The president declined to rule out military action when questioned Monday about Greenland acquisition methods, signaling serious intent beyond social media theater. Trump administration officials have positioned tariff threats against European nations as economic leverage to pressure Denmark into negotiations. Plans to raise the issue of Greenland at the World Economic Forum in Davos demonstrate Trump’s determination to make territorial expansion a central diplomatic priority. This multifaceted pressure campaign combines economic weapons, diplomatic maneuvering, and military options—precisely the kind of strength-based negotiating conservatives recognize as effective against foreign governments accustomed to American weakness under previous administrations. European Resistance Highlights Sovereignty Divide Greenland’s self-governing administration has categorically rejected American integration proposals, which Denmark has backed with its assertion of territorial integrity and European Union solidarity. The leaked Macron message reveals European confusion and concern over Trump’s unconventional diplomatic approach, exposing the transatlantic divide between American national interest and European multilateralism. Denmark and its allies counter U.S. pressure through unified public statements, yet possess limited leverage against American economic and military power. Short-term diplomatic friction risks escalating into tariff wars that affect EU trade, while long-term implications could fundamentally reshape Arctic geopolitics and strain NATO relations if Trump pursues military options. JUST IN – Trump posts a picture of himself talking to European leaders with a map depicting Greenland and Canada as part of the U.S. in the background. pic.twitter.com/5EI2OYAXXe — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) February 9, 2026 Strategic Vision Versus Globalist Opposition Trump’s vision of territorial expansion reflects core conservative principles of American strength, resource security, and a rejection of artificial constraints imposed by international institutions. The Arctic region holds immense strategic value for military positioning and untapped natural resources that could benefit American prosperity and independence. While establishment critics frame Trump’s actions as destabilizing trolling, supporters recognize calculated moves to secure American interests against rising threats from China and Russia in the Arctic. The president’s approach bypasses failed diplomatic conventions that have allowed adversaries to strengthen positions while America remained passive. This bold reassertion of American power demonstrates the leadership our frustrated nation desperately needed after years of globalist retreat and apologetic foreign policy. Sources: Trump Adds Greenland, Canada and Venezuela to U.S. in Post of AI-Edited Map – Notus

The Trump Administration just pulled nearly 2,000 unqualified truckers off American highways in a massive three-day enforcement sweep that revealed nearly 500 drivers couldn’t even speak English well enough to meet basic safety requirements. Three-Day Crackdown Reveals Widespread Safety Violations Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration officers partnered with state law enforcement across 26 states and Washington, D.C., to conduct 8,215 commercial vehicle inspections targeting major freight corridors and high-risk locations. The coordinated enforcement effort identified dangerous driving behaviors, unqualified operators, and unsafe vehicles that posed immediate threats to public safety. Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy announced the results on February 6, 2026, highlighting the operation’s success in removing immediate hazards from American roadways. The enforcement action targeted fundamental qualifications that commercial drivers must meet to legally operate massive vehicles alongside families traveling to work and school. This is absolutely terrible. Why would they hire somebody who isn’t even legal to be here and probably doesn’t know how to drive the truck !lock him up. unforgivable. https://t.co/zWDdulacgq — lorijoan (@ljpalk) February 6, 2026 English Proficiency Violations Dominate Enforcement Actions Of the 704 drivers placed out of service, nearly 500 were removed specifically for English proficiency violations. This represents a staggering 71 percent of all driver removals stemming from inability to communicate effectively in English. Federal regulations require commercial drivers to read and speak English sufficiently to converse with the general public, understand highway traffic signs and signals, respond to official inquiries, and make entries on reports and records. The ability to communicate during emergencies, understand law enforcement instructions, and comprehend safety warnings is not merely bureaucratic red tape—it’s a matter of life and death on highways where split-second decisions prevent catastrophic accidents involving 80,000-pound vehicles traveling at highway speeds. Arrests Include Impaired and Illegal Drivers Beyond out-of-service orders, law enforcement made 56 arrests during the three-day operation. These arrests included drivers operating commercial vehicles while under the influence of alcohol or drugs, representing an unconscionable disregard for public safety. Additionally, arrests were made for illegal presence violations, indicating foreign nationals operating commercial vehicles without legal authorization to be in the United States. FMCSA Administrator Derek D. Barrs emphasized that when drivers ignore rules, operate without proper qualifications, or get behind the wheel impaired, they put all lives at risk. The combination of impairment, illegal status, and language barriers created a perfect storm of safety hazards that the previous administration apparently allowed to persist unchecked. Unsafe Vehicles Removed From Service The operation placed 1,231 vehicles out of service for safety violations, representing mechanical defects serious enough to pose imminent hazards. These unsafe vehicles included trucks with defective brakes, steering systems, tires, or other critical components that could cause catastrophic failures. Federal inspectors are authorized to immediately ground any commercial vehicle that fails to meet minimum safety standards until repairs are completed and verified. The removal of over 1,200 dangerous vehicles demonstrates the scale of negligence that had been allowed to flourish. Commercial trucks require regular maintenance and inspection, yet these vehicles were operating on public highways with American families despite failing basic safety requirements. This represents a fundamental breakdown in enforcement that endangered every driver sharing the road with these rolling hazards. WFAA investigation reveals how trucking companies avoid authorities, with deadly consequences. Our nation's highways are now overrun by ghost fleets mostly being operated by illegal alien truck drivers in possession of illicit Non-Domicile CDLs. Great reporting by… pic.twitter.com/sWww6Im3L6 — American Truckers (@atutruckers) February 2, 2026 Trump Administration Emphasizes Whole-of-Government Approach Secretary Duffy framed Operation SafeDRIVE as demonstrating what coordinated federal-state enforcement can accomplish when officials prioritize protecting American families over lax oversight. The operation required collaboration between federal FMCSA officials and state law enforcement partners across more than half the nation. Duffy stated the Trump Administration requires a whole-of-government approach to ensure strong safety standards are in place to protect American families and reduce road accidents. This represents a dramatic shift from the regulatory turbulence of 2025, when trucking companies faced inconsistent enforcement. The language of “first wave” in official announcements suggests additional phases may be planned, signaling sustained commitment to removing unqualified operators rather than conducting isolated publicity stunts that fail to address systemic problems. Sources: Trump’s Transportation Secretary Sean P. Duffy’s Operation SafeDRIVE Results in Removal of Nearly 2,000 Unqualified Truckers from American Roads and Arrests Operation SafeDRIVE: Nearly 2,000 Unqualified Truckers Removed, At Least 500 Who Can’t Speak English Operation Safe Driver Enforcement Blitz: CVSA Set Dates, Autonomous Vehicle Bill Stopped Operation Safe Driver Week to Begin July 11 Operation Safe Driver Week to Target Reckless, Careless Driving

Norway’s Crown Princess Mette-Marit maintained a close friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein for three years after his pedophile conviction, brazenly dismissing red flags she discovered through her own Google search, newly unsealed U.S. Department of Justice documents reveal. Elite Privilege and Willful Blindness Crown Princess Mette-Marit’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein exemplifies the disturbing moral bankruptcy of global elites who believe rules apply only to common citizens. The future queen consort of Norway acknowledged in a 2011 email to Epstein that her Google search revealed troubling information about the convicted sex offender, yet she added a smiling emoji and continued cultivating the friendship. This wasn’t ignorance—it was a calculated choice to prioritize personal benefits over basic decency. Her willingness to overlook Epstein’s 2008 conviction for procuring a minor for prostitution demonstrates the same elitist mindset Americans have rejected, where powerful figures operate above moral standards they expect others to follow. Palace Cover-Up Compounds Royal Scandal The Norwegian royal palace’s handling of the Epstein connection reveals institutional dishonesty that should alarm anyone who values transparency in public figures. When the relationship first surfaced publicly in 2019, palace officials minimized the contact as limited to 2011-2013 and portrayed a Saint Barthélemy meeting as a chance encounter. The newly released DOJ documents expose these claims as false—contacts continued through 2014, and the Caribbean meeting was prearranged. Palace spokesperson Guri Varpe repeated inaccurate details that misled the Norwegian public for years. This pattern of deception mirrors tactics used by political elites worldwide to shield themselves from accountability, treating citizens as too uninformed to deserve the truth. Monarchy in Crisis Amid Compounding Scandals The Epstein revelations strike Norway’s royal family at its most vulnerable moment, compounding existing turmoil that threatens the institution’s survival. Mette-Marit’s son from a previous relationship, Marius Borg Høiby, faces trial on 38 criminal charges, including rape, beginning just days after the DOJ document release. Royal historian Lars Hovbakke Sørensen declared this the “most severe crisis in Norwegian monarchy history,” warning that insufficient transparency risks destroying public confidence. The scandal fuels republican sentiments in egalitarian Norway, where citizens increasingly question the relevance of hereditary privilege. Even Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre publicly criticized Mette-Marit’s judgment, signaling cross-party concern about the monarchy’s legitimacy when leadership exhibits such profound moral failures. Personal Emails Reveal Disturbing Familiarity The content of Mette-Marit’s communications with Epstein demonstrates a level of comfort that contradicts her post-scandal claims of mere acquaintanceship. A 2012 email shows the princess suggesting wallpaper designs featuring “two naked women” for Epstein’s residence, revealing an intimacy that extended beyond professional networking. She spent four days at his Palm Beach, Florida, property in 2013, arranged through mutual connections despite widespread media coverage of his criminal history. The relationship ended in 2014 when Mette-Marit realized Epstein was using their connection for his own purposes. Court expert Carl-Erik Grimstad noted that “alarm bells should have rung” within palace oversight systems, yet institutional safeguards failed completely, allowing a future queen to maintain ties with a predator. Mette-Marit issued an apology, expressing “deep regret,” and called her contact with Epstein “simply embarrassing,” acknowledging poor judgment and a failure to scrutinize his background despite prior awareness. However, her statement rings hollow given the documented evidence of willful engagement with a known criminal. The scandal exposes how elite circles protect their own while ordinary citizens face consequences for far lesser transgressions. For Americans who endured years of globalist policies that prioritized international elites over national interests, this Norwegian royal debacle confirms what many have long understood: the global elite class operates by different rules, with contempt for the values and safety of regular people they claim to serve. Sources: Norway crown princess under fresh fire with Epstein scandal – Daily Sabah Relationship of Mette-Marit, Crown Princess of Norway, and Jeffrey Epstein – Wikipedia Norwegian crown princess apologizes to royals all disappointed by her Epstein contacts – Los Angeles Times Norwegian royal family Mette-Marit Epstein scandal – The Independent Norwegian crown princess issues apology to those disappointed amid scrutiny of Epstein links – KSAT

Ellen DeGeneres, who publicly fled America after President Trump’s 2024 victory, has quietly purchased a $27 million California mansion—exposing the hollow theatrics of yet another wealthy celebrity’s anti-Trump grandstanding. The Dramatic Exit That Wasn’t Ellen DeGeneres and Portia de Rossi relocated to England’s Cotswolds in November 2024, shortly after President Trump’s election victory. DeGeneres publicly cited the election outcome as her reason for staying abroad, praising the U.K.’s “simpler, cleaner” lifestyle during a BBC interview. She positioned herself as seeking refuge from American politics, joining a chorus of celebrities threatening to leave the country. Yet by late 2025, the couple quietly purchased a $27.4 million Montecito estate through a trust managed by business manager Harley J. Neuman, revealing their supposed exile was more performance than principle. Ellen DeGeneres shops for new mansion same day she calls for ICE buying boycott https://t.co/tTPlI6bIRf pic.twitter.com/qoEXMcQ7IG — California Post (@californiapost) January 30, 2026 California Comfort Wins Over Political Convictions The Montecito mansion purchase, confirmed through property records and DeGeneres’ own social media posts in January 2026, undermines her dramatic departure narrative. Sources told Fox News the couple missed California’s weather and “horse scene”—hardly the existential concerns one would expect from political refugees. The estate sits in an elite enclave alongside Jennifer Aniston and Gwyneth Paltrow, offering the same luxuries DeGeneres supposedly rejected when fleeing Trump’s America. Her January birthday photo from the California property and videos filmed on its porch confirm active use, not merely an investment property gathering dust. A Pattern of Real Estate Opportunism DeGeneres has built a lucrative side business flipping high-end properties, selling a Carpinteria estate for $96 million in August 2024 alone. The couple purchased their first Cotswolds farmhouse for approximately $19 million, employing 70 workers for rapid renovations before listing it in July 2025. After slashing the price by $4.5 million with no buyers, they delisted the property—suggesting their U.K. adventure may be winding down. Meanwhile, they acquired a second glass-walled Cotswolds mansion, maintaining options on both continents. This transactional approach to residences contradicts the permanence implied by her political statements about leaving America behind. BREAKING: Ellen DeGenere’s mansion in the UK that she just moved into is currently underwater. LMFAO pic.twitter.com/gz9uwk2znj — aka (@akafaceUS) November 30, 2024 The Hypocrisy Conservatives Have Come to Expect DeGeneres’ actions embody the disconnect between wealthy celebrities’ public virtue-signaling and their private choices. She characterized America under Trump as intolerable, yet within months demonstrated that access to California sunshine and polo horses outweighed her political objections. This pattern mirrors other Hollywood elites who threatened to leave but remained, or departed briefly before quietly returning. Fellow comedian Rosie O’Donnell expressed surprise at DeGeneres’ political rationale, noting her historically apolitical stance. The reality is clear: DeGeneres enjoys the freedom and prosperity America provides while publicly disparaging the president millions of patriots elected, then returns when convenient without acknowledging the contradiction. The dual-residence arrangement allows DeGeneres to maintain her lifestyle preferences while avoiding accountability for her political theatrics. Sources insist the California stay is temporary, with plans to return to England, but actions speak louder than words. For everyday Americans who cannot afford multi-million-dollar escape properties, such elite mobility during political disagreements remains fantasy. DeGeneres’ privilege enables her to treat countries like interchangeable vacation homes, undermining any pretense of principled opposition to Trump’s presidency. Her fans may accept this behavior, but conservatives recognize it as the entitled hypocrisy it represents—another reminder of the chasm between Hollywood’s lecturing class and the values of hardworking American families. Sources: Ellen DeGeneres returns to California with $27M mansion purchase after fleeing US post-Trump victory – Fox News Ellen DeGeneres Birthday at New Montecito Mansion – Realtor.com Ellen DeGeneres California and Cotswolds Homes – Evening Standard