As a freshly restored national monument starts falling apart, a former Olympian’s arrest has turned the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool into the latest battleground over vandalism, blame, and basic accountability. Story Snapshot Federal officers arrested multiple people at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool after reports of vandalism at the newly restored site. Former Olympic canoeist David Hearn was charged with destruction of government property but insists he only touched material that was already peeling. President Trump says vandals tried to sabotage the project and vows serious penalties, echoing his long‑standing stance on monument protection. Media critics and Biden‑era allies claim the damage stems from bad renovation work, not crime, and accuse Trump of shifting blame without proof. Arrests At A Symbolic Monument Spark A New Fight Over Blame Federal authorities say multiple people have been arrested at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool after reports of vandalism at the newly refurbished site.[1] President Donald Trump announced that United States Park Police had taken several suspects into custody for damaging “our Nation’s magnificent Reflecting Pool,” which just underwent a renovation costing more than fourteen million dollars.[1][3] An administration official said at least five people were arrested and five more cited as officers responded to repeated incidents around the pool.[1] The high‑profile location and the fresh taxpayer spending make this more than a simple trespassing story for many Americans. Trump’s public message stressed that damaging national monuments is a “very serious” crime and warned that offenders could face “years in jail” under federal law.[1] That stance fits with his earlier executive order directing the federal government to prosecute monument vandalism to the fullest extent, using laws that allow up to ten‑year prison terms for willful injury to federal property.[13] Supporters see this as basic respect for the country’s history. Critics, especially in left‑leaning media, quickly pushed a different angle, arguing the real problem is a flawed renovation and not criminal intent at all.[4] Former Olympian Charged, But He Says He Only Touched Loose Material One arrest is drawing special attention because the suspect is former United States Olympic canoeist David Hearn, now sixty‑seven years old.[1][2] Hearn was taken into custody on a misdemeanor charge of destruction of government property after he interacted with a loose piece of the blue liner at the bottom of the pool.[1][2] According to his own account, he had finished a long bike ride and stopped to look at the new “American flag blue” surface when he noticed material already peeling away.[2] He says he “reached in there” to feel the end of that piece but did not remove or break anything before officers moved in and handcuffed him.[1][2] Hearn flatly denies being a vandal, telling reporters, “I didn’t vandalize anything. I didn’t destroy or break or peel anything.”[1][6] Video shared online appears to show officers stepping in quickly after he interacts with the liner and with equipment workers were using around the pool.[5][8] Supporters portray him as a curious bystander caught up in an overreaction. Yet police and prosecutors decided his conduct met the legal standard for a charge, and he now faces a court date in Washington, D.C. Superior Court next month.[1] For many readers, this raises a key question: where is the line between foolish contact with federal property and intentional damage that taxpayers must repair? Media Clash Over Vandalism Versus Renovation Failure Conservative outlets and Trump allies stress the pattern of arrests and the long struggle to protect famous sites from repeat damage.[3][17] Fox News reported that several people were detained in separate incidents for getting into the pool and allegedly vandalizing the new surface, prompting a security surge around the memorial.[3] The United States National Park Service has warned for years that graffiti and other damage at landmarks is extremely hard and costly to fix, draining funds from other maintenance work.[15] In that view, firm enforcement is common sense, not “overreach.” Other outlets, including public broadcasting and major city papers, have tried to flip the story by highlighting what they call a lack of public forensic proof behind the vandalism claims.[4] One Associated Press piece framed Trump as “trying to blame” pool problems on vandals “without offering substantiation” while the new liner suffered algae growth and visible peeling.[4] Reporters noted that workers were already cleaning algae blooms and dealing with loose coating in several spots, which could point to workmanship or materials trouble instead of a single sabotage event.[2] These stories downplay the arrest record and focus on the idea that the renovation itself may have been flawed from the start. What We Know, What We Do Not, And Why It Matters For Taxpayers Right now, the public record confirms some hard facts but leaves other important questions open. We know Park Police made multiple arrests and filed at least one formal charge for destruction of government property tied to activity at the Reflecting Pool.[1][3] We know Hearn admits touching material that he says was already loose, while officials said they viewed the same behavior as damaging federal property.[1][2] We also know the new blue surface is now peeling and discolored in several areas, forcing more work shortly after a costly renovation.[1][2] Yes, U.S. Park Police have made multiple arrests for alleged vandalism at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. Reports confirm at least 5 arrests and 5 citations as of this weekend, with 14 police reports filed. One named individual: 67-year-old former Olympian David Hearn,… — Grok (@grok) June 22, 2026 What we do not yet have are full engineering reports, lab tests, or complete incident files that show how much of the damage came from sloppy work and how much, if any, came from deliberate sabotage.[1][4] That lack of detail gives both sides room to spin, and social media has been quick to amplify the loudest claims while skipping the fine print. For constitution‑minded readers, two principles stand out: the government must enforce laws that protect shared national sites, and it must also be transparent so citizens can see real evidence, not just talking points. Until agencies release more records, this fight will remain another example of how even a reflecting pool can become a mirror for the country’s deeper political divide. Sources: [1] Web – Trump says vandals sabotaged Reflecting Pool, Olympian arrested [2] Web – Trump says Reflecting Pool repairs will begin ‘immediately’ after … [3] Web – Trump says multiple people have been arrested for allegedly … [4] Web – Trump vows jail time after recent arrests at Lincoln Memorial … [5] Web – Trump tries to blame Reflecting Poll woes on vandalism, without … [6] Web – Trump says arrests made over alleged vandalism at Lincoln … – Yahoo [8] Web – Lincoln Memorial reflecting pool vandalized with ’86 47′ graffiti – … [13] Web – Cyclist arrested at Reflecting Pool denies vandalism claims after … [15] YouTube – Ex-Olympian Arrested for Allegedly Touching Reflecting Pool Floor [17] Web – Trump: ‘Multiple arrests’ at Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool

A fragile ceasefire in Lebanon is buckling as Israeli strikes in Nabatiyeh spark rival claims, rising civilian deaths, and fresh calls to expose Hezbollah’s tactics. Story Snapshot Israeli military says it hit Hezbollah weapons sites and infrastructure in Nabatiyeh amid ongoing cross-border fire [3][6]. Lebanese outlets report civilian deaths and damage, fueling claims of ceasefire breaches and demands for accountability [11][12]. Rights groups question target choices and urge investigations into strikes on civilian-linked sites [7][23]. Evidence gaps remain about the exact Nabatiyeh facility, leaving room for spin on both sides [3]. Israeli Military Says Strikes Aimed at Hezbollah Targets Israeli officials said air crews struck several Hezbollah facilities around Nabatiyeh. They listed weapons storage sites, military structures, and infrastructure tied to the group. They framed the action as a response to more than 50 projectiles launched from Lebanon during the ceasefire window. They added that operations targeted dozens of sites associated with Hezbollah across Lebanon. These statements stress military aims, not civilian areas, and cite continuing cross-border attacks to justify the strikes [3][6]. Reports from Israeli sources describe a broad target set. The set includes logistics hubs that support rockets, drones, and command work. Officials argue Hezbollah embeds in dense towns to shield military assets. That tactic raises risks for civilians when fighting resumes. Israeli leaders say the goal is to blunt current fire and stop future rearmament. They also say the strikes are part of a pattern in south Lebanon, the Bekaa Valley, and near Beirut where Hezbollah operates [6]. Lebanese Reports Highlight Civilian Deaths and Ceasefire Strain Lebanese state media and civil defense reports say strikes in the Nabatiyeh area killed multiple civilians and injured others. One Associated Press account said part of a building collapsed, killing members of a single family, including a child. Those reports fueled claims that the strikes broke the truce and hit non-military sites. Lebanese leaders and media voices urged retaliation or international pressure, adding heat to a ceasefire already under stress [11][12]. Conflicting claims deepen public confusion. Israeli officials describe military targets and frames of self-defense. Lebanese accounts point to homes, rescue workers, and public infrastructure hit in south Lebanon. Each side faults the other for breaking the truce. The gap between battlefield statements and on-the-ground harm shapes global reaction. It also raises hard questions about how to verify what was hit, why it was chosen, and whether steps to prevent civilian deaths worked as claimed [11]. Rights Groups Challenge Target Choices and Demand Proof Amnesty International urged probes into Israeli strikes on a financial network tied to Hezbollah, arguing such branches serve civilians and are not lawful military targets. The group said Israel itself described those sites by their funding role, not by direct combat use. Earlier research reviewed broad destruction of civilian structures since late 2024 and documented ongoing harm after the ceasefire date. These findings fuel calls to release target files, imagery, and legal reviews for public scrutiny [7][23]. Numerous Israeli airstrikes killed many people in Lebanon despite an agreed ceasefire, with the Lebanese civil defence authorities saying they had recovered 16 bodies in the southern city of Nabatiyeh alonehttps://t.co/Pm15bySYLR — dpa news agency (@dpa_intl) June 20, 2026 Key gaps remain around Nabatiyeh. The record names categories like weapons stores and military structures but does not show the exact facility struck. There are no coordinates, chain-of-custody images, or public battle damage proof in the provided material. That leaves citizens sorting through claims and counterclaims, while images of rubble drive the narrative. Independent evidence, if released, could show whether the site was a lawful military objective or a civilian building misidentified in the fog of war [3]. Why This Matters for American Readers Hezbollah is an Iran-backed force that fires rockets at Israel and hides among civilians. That mix turns towns into battle zones. It also gives media and activists room to paint every strike as an attack on civilians. Americans care because our allies face terror groups tied to Iran, and truth gets lost when facts are thin. Clear proof on targets, and honest reporting on Hezbollah tactics, help avoid propaganda wins for Tehran’s proxies [6]. Accountability should cut both ways. Israel should back claims with verifiable evidence about Nabatiyeh targets. Lebanon should press Hezbollah to stop using civilian areas to stage attacks and store weapons. Ceasefires only hold if parties stop firing and stop hiding behind families and clinics. Transparency, not slogans, can protect innocent people and reveal who is breaking the rules. Until then, expect more strikes, more grief, and more spin from both camps [6][23]. Bottom Line for Conservatives This fight is part of a wider struggle against Iran’s network. Hezbollah fires rockets and dares Israel to respond near homes and schools. Israel says it hit military sites in Nabatiyeh, but has not released proof the public can vet. Lebanese reports show civilians paid a price. Demand facts. Demand evidence. And do not let terror groups hide in plain sight, then weaponize the fallout for political gain [3][11][23]. Sources: [3] Web – Air strikes hit Nabatieh in southern Lebanon on Saturday … – … [6] Web – sraeli strikes on Nabatieh in south Lebanon have killed at least 16 … [7] Web – Israel’s military says it’s striking Hezbollah sites as Netanyahu vows … [11] Web – First responders inspect the sites of Israeli strikes on the southern … [12] Web – Israeli airstrikes kill 10 civilians in Lebanon, state media reports … [23] YouTube – Israeli strikes target multiple Hezbollah sites in southern Lebanon

A secretive Peter Thiel–backed club for global elites just left a jackpot of personal data sitting online, and foreign spies could not have asked for a better cheat sheet. Story Snapshot A “private” Thiel-linked network called Dialog allegedly exposed member lists, bios, and retreat data. The leak reportedly includes political leanings, dating info, and a private login token for each person. Hundreds of powerful figures from tech, finance, media, and government appear in the leaked records. The incident shows how carelessly guarded elite networks create major openings for espionage and blackmail. Inside Thiel’s Invitation-Only Elite Network Dialog is described as a private, invite-only society started around 2006 by billionaire investor Peter Thiel and business partner Auren Hoffman, meant to bring together powerful people from technology, politics, finance, and government for off-the-record talks.[3] For about twenty years, the group reportedly kept its membership secret and operated quietly with no public roster.[1] Members and guests were told their participation and personal details would stay private, which makes the recent data exposure especially serious.[1] Reports say Dialog’s events include closed-door retreats and sessions on war, culture, technology, and even personal topics like sex and “cult-building.”[4] That mix of high-level policy themes and intimate discussions makes the guest list valuable to anyone looking to map influence networks. Coverage lists current officials, senators, billionaires, executives, and media figures among those linked to the group, including Elon Musk, Senator Ted Cruz, and other big names from Silicon Valley and Washington.[3] The crowd alone guarantees intense interest from foreign intelligence services. How A Simple Web Flaw Exposed Deeply Personal Data According to several reports, a Swiss hacktivist known for previously finding the United States government’s no-fly list discovered an open directory embedded in Dialog’s website code that anyone could view.[1] That directory reportedly exposed “participant profiles” and other internal records tied to retreats.[1] A separate registration list for the 2026 retreat was also provided to reporters, naming 222 individuals and showing whether they were members, guests, or first-time attendees.[1] This was not a vague leak—it was an organized roster of real people and their history with the group. For each person, the leaked records allegedly contained membership status, every retreat attended, a biography, home city, political affiliation, and a “private access token” that functioned as a login credential.[1] Other reporting says the data included personal email addresses, phone numbers, employers, birthdates, assistants’ contacts, emergency contacts, and even dietary needs.[9] One field asked participants to list their political leaning from “Far Left” to “Far Right” with a note promising that answer would “never” be shared.[9] At this point, there is no public proof that anyone has used the login tokens to break into Dialog systems, but the presence of such credentials greatly raises the security stakes.[1] Dating Questions, Political Profiles, And Blackmail Risk Several outlets highlight a “matchmaking” or dating component tied to Dialog events.[1] Registration forms reportedly asked participants if they were “looking for love” at the retreat and recorded that answer alongside other personal details.[9] Security coverage also refers to “dating data” in the exposed records, suggesting that romantic interests or preferences were tied directly to real names and profiles.[1] For powerful people, such intimate information can be a gift to anyone trying to coerce, embarrass, or manipulate them behind closed doors. Modern intelligence operations often rely on social engineering, not just hacking, and they look for pressure points like relationships, secrets, and ideology.[18] Here, the leak allegedly combines political leanings, detailed biographies, contact networks, and possible dating information in a single place.[1] That makes it easier to craft believable phishing emails, tailor recruitment pitches, or stage “honey trap” scenarios for targeted officials and executives. Even if no attack has been documented yet, the attack surface now exists, and it will not disappear just because media attention fades.[16] Why This Elite Breach Matters For Everyday Americans This leak is not the largest data breach on record, but the value lies in who is exposed and how carefully they were supposed to be protected.[19] Research shows that credential-rich breaches are a favorite tool for hostile states and criminal gangs, who reuse the same email addresses, tokens, and profile data across many campaigns.[22] When the dataset revolves around people who help set policy, run tech platforms, and move markets, the stakes are far higher than a normal consumer breach. Compromised elites can mean compromised decisions that affect the rest of us. AI synthesised (google flash) research on Peter Thiel's secret DIALOG forum and it's relationship to the ATLAS NETWORKI don't have time to go through it right now…Posting here in case anybody wants to follow it up … ——-# Dialog: The Secret Silicon Valley Network… — QuinnjinWilliams (@quinnjin2009) June 22, 2026 Trump-era officials named in coverage now have a clear duty to work with law enforcement and security teams to lock down accounts, rotate credentials, and report any strange contacts.[9] At the same time, this episode is a warning about unaccountable global clubs where powerful insiders make plans out of public view. When those same insiders cannot even secure their own secret society website, Americans are right to ask hard questions. Strong national security and real privacy protection demand less elite secrecy, tighter cyber standards, and more respect for the citizens whose lives these networks help shape. Sources: [1] Web – Peter Thiel’s Secret Society Leak Creates A Perfect Target List For … [3] Web – Leak Exposes Members of Peter Thiel’s Secretive ‘Dialog’ … [4] Web – Data leak reveals Texas elites in Peter Thiel’s secret society [9] Web – Watch Members of Peter Thiel’s Secretive ‘Dialog’ Society … [16] Web – than 200 of the world’s elites registered for a retreat whose agenda … [18] Web – 7 Real-Life Data Breaches Caused by Insider Threats – Syteca [19] Web – Cyber Espionage and U.S. Policy Responses [22] Web – 2026 Data Breaches: Cybersecurity Incidents Explained – PKWARE

A hard-right outsider has surged to the edge of power in Colombia, and voters now face a stark choice over security, order, and the country’s direction. Quick Take Abelardo de la Espriella led the first round with **43.7%** of the vote and advanced to the runoff[1][7]. Major outlets describe him as a **right-wing outsider** or **far-right** candidate[1][6][7]. His campaign centers on **crime, armed groups, mega-prisons,** and a tougher security state[1][2][5][6]. Supporters see him as a break from Petro-era politics, while critics warn of civil-liberties risks[5][6][7]. First-Round Surge Changes the Race De la Espriella finished first in Colombia’s opening round, with the official preliminary count giving him 43.7 percent and placing him in a runoff against Iván Cepeda[1][7]. Reuters described him as a tough-on-crime outsider who gained ground late in the race by promising a hard response to armed groups[2]. That result gave his camp a clear talking point: more Colombians backed his message than any rival in the first round. The first-round numbers matter because Colombia is not choosing between two weak contenders. It is choosing between two camps with very different views of security, state power, and negotiations with armed groups[2][6]. De la Espriella’s lead also gives conservatives a political opening after years of frustration with crime, instability, and the left’s handling of public order. But the race is still close enough that turnout and coalition work can decide the final result. A Law-and-Order Message Built for Frustrated Voters De la Espriella’s appeal rests on a simple promise: restore order fast. Reporting from Reuters, CBS News, and Al Jazeera says he has pushed a hardline security platform that includes building 10 mega-prisons, cracking down on armed groups, and taking a far tougher line on coca production and crime[1][2][5][6]. For voters tired of weak institutions and endless violence, that message sounds blunt, direct, and familiar. His supporters also view him as a fighter rather than a polished politician. Reuters quoted him saying he would stand as Colombia’s finest warrior to defend democracy until death, a line designed to project force and resolve[2]. That style has helped him consolidate voters who want a clean break from the Petro era. It also explains why some conservatives see him as the kind of candidate who speaks plainly about public safety instead of hiding behind talk. Why Critics See More Than a Normal Conservative Shift Critics say the same qualities that make de la Espriella effective also make him risky. Wikipedia and Al Jazeera report that he has backed extreme positions, including allowing police to shoot violent protesters, leaving the Inter-American Court of Human Rights and the United Nations, and ending peace talks with armed groups[1][6]. Those positions go far beyond ordinary conservative politics. They raise real questions about civil liberties, protest rights, and the limits of state power. Tomorrow, Colombia will hold its presidential runoff. 'The Tiger' Abelardo de la Espriella is facing the candidate of the radical marxist left. Colombia deserves common sense, security, prosperity, and law & order. The outcome will matter not only for Colombia and Latin America,… pic.twitter.com/N82boGKpMS — Dominik Tarczyński MEP (@D_Tarczynski) June 20, 2026 The other problem is branding. Several outlets call him a right-wing outsider, but Bloomberg reporting says he is backed by traditional political parties and Álvaro Uribe, which weakens the claim that he is a pure outsider[7]. CBS also described his campaign as fear-based and heavily driven by social media[5]. That matters because a message built on anger can win votes quickly, but it can also leave less room for serious policy debate and hard governing choices. Trump Ties Add Fuel to the Fight De la Espriella has also embraced pro-Trump positioning, and that has become part of his national image. CBS and PBS reported that he admires Donald Trump, aligns himself with Trump’s vision, and thanked Trump for an endorsement[5][10]. For supporters, that signals strength and a more pro-U.S. foreign policy. For critics, it gives them a ready-made argument that the campaign is too tied to outside political symbolism. That foreign-policy framing can distort the race. Instead of focusing only on crime, jobs, and the cost of living, the debate can turn into a test of loyalty to Trump or to the old left-right divide. Colombia still has to decide whether it wants a harder line on violence, a stronger hand against armed groups, and a smaller state. The runoff will show whether voters want that break or fear what comes with it. Sources: [1] Web – The Right-Wing Outsider Who Could Be Colombia’s Next Leader… [2] Web – Abelardo de la Espriella – Wikipedia [5] Web – Continuity or change? What to know about Colombia’s run-off election [6] YouTube – Abelardo de la Espriella and Iván Cepeda put it all on the line [7] Web – Abelardo De La Espriella es el próximo presidente de Colombia … [10] Web – Abelardo de la Espriella: Colombian election 2026 guides

Nine months after an illegal alien’s status hit the headlines, Maryland finally took his name off the voter rolls—only after watchdogs, lawmakers, and the threat of federal court turned up the heat. Story Snapshot A non-citizen school superintendent stayed on Maryland’s “active” voter list for more than a decade despite a deportation order. State officials admit they mostly “take the voter’s word for it” on citizenship instead of running real checks. County election bosses first hid key records, then reversed course when watchdogs threatened a federal lawsuit. The case exposes how loopholes and red tape can leave illegal aliens on voter rolls while citizens worry about election integrity. How An Illegal Alien Ended Up On Maryland’s Voter Rolls Ian Andre Roberts, a Guyanese national and former Baltimore school official who later ran Iowa’s largest school system, managed to register as a voter in Maryland and stay on the rolls for years.[1][8] Records show he affirmatively claimed to be a United States citizen on his voter registration form, even though federal immigration authorities had ordered him removed from the country.[1][2] Maryland law clearly says only United States citizens can register to vote, under penalty of perjury, yet the system still accepted his claim.[8] Roberts was arrested in Iowa in September 2025 for being an illegal alien in possession of firearms, which brought fresh attention to his background and legal status.[2] After the arrest, Maryland Republican lawmakers and election watchdog groups discovered that he remained listed as an active voter in Prince George’s County, years after he had moved away and long after he should have been ineligible.[3][8] The situation raised an obvious question for many citizens: if this one case slipped through for so long, how many others like it are still buried in the voter files? Nine Months Of Delays, Excuses, And Outside Pressure According to one watchdog group tracking the case, Roberts was still on Maryland’s voter rolls more than eight months after his arrest and three months after he pled guilty and admitted he was not a citizen.[3] County election officials at first released only redacted copies of his registration that hid his answer to the basic question, “Are you a U.S. citizen?”[1] They produced the full, unredacted records only after Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections and the American Accountability Foundation sent a formal demand under the National Voter Registration Act and warned of imminent federal litigation.[1] That pressure campaign also drew in Congress. The House Administration Committee, led by Chairman Bryan Steil, sent a letter to the Maryland State Board of Elections demanding answers about how a known non-citizen could register at least twice and remain on the rolls for so long.[2][4] Their letter warned that repeated redactions around Roberts’s registration suggested Maryland was either hiding a serious mistake or covering up a failure to verify citizenship.[2][4] Republican lawmakers in Maryland added their own letter, saying the case cast doubt on the accuracy of the state’s voter lists and demanding a full review.[8] Maryland’s “Trust The Applicant” System And Why It Failed Maryland’s own election chief has admitted that the state mostly relies on what applicants write on the form instead of checking citizenship against independent records.[5] In a public statement on non-citizen inquiries, State Board of Elections Administrator Jared DeMarinis explained that “when an individual registers to vote, election officials rely on the information that is provided by the voter.”[5] He also said that non-citizen removals usually start only when a voter self-reports or when jury commissioners flag someone as a non-citizen.[1][5] Maryland’s list-maintenance rules say officials can cancel a registration after notice if a jury commission reports that a voter is a non-citizen, or if other specific government sources confirm ineligibility.[11] Officials also stress that federal law, including the National Voter Registration Act, limits when a state can remove someone without the voter’s signature.[11] Those protections are meant to stop wrongful purges of real citizens, but in Roberts’s case, they meant even a long-standing federal deportation order did not automatically trigger removal from the rolls.[1] The system gave every benefit of the doubt to the registrant, not to the integrity of the list. Election Integrity Concerns In A Broader National Fight Nationally, many studies say proven non-citizen voting is extremely rare, measured in a handful of cases out of tens of millions of ballots.[21][22][23] That argument is now used by election lawyers and progressive groups to oppose stronger proof-of-citizenship requirements, calling them a “solution in search of a problem.”[18][19][21] But cases like Roberts show how just one determined non-citizen, helped by lax checks and layers of bureaucracy, can stay on the books for more than a decade and even survive a deportation order without triggering an automatic fix.[1][3][8] The Other Maryland Man finally removed from Maryland Voter Registration list. 9 months after it was discovered that a superintendent of a large school district was not only a noncitizen with a final deportation order, but also had been illicitly registered to vote in… pic.twitter.com/xqKTCskJQR — Maryland Freedom Caucus (@MDFreedomCaucus) June 19, 2026 For many conservative voters, this is not about proving millions of illegal votes. It is about whether state officials respect the basic rule that only citizens pick our leaders and write our laws. In Maryland, some local towns even allow non-citizens to vote in certain local elections, which makes tight separation and careful list management even more important.[12][20] Yet this case shows a system that shrugs at red flags and moves only when watchdogs and Congress apply public pressure. Sources: [1] Web – How It Took Nine Months To Remove One Illegal Alien From Voter Rolls [2] Web – Maryland Elections Officials Back Down on Illegal Alien Voter … [3] Web – Maryland Republican lawmakers demand review of State voter rolls [4] Web – Ian Roberts, illegal immigrant facing prison for citizenship fraud, … [5] YouTube – Maryland lawmakers call for answers after learning Iowa … [8] Web – This guy was registered to vote in Maryland for over a decade even … [11] Web – – EXAMINING POTENTIAL UPDATES TO THE NVRA – GovInfo [12] Web – Voter Registration List Maintenance [18] Web – – THE BIDEN-HARRIS BORDER CRISIS: NONCITIZEN VOTING [19] Web – The Truth about False Claims of Noncitizen Voting – Voting Rights Lab [20] Web – Voting By Noncitizens is a Non-Issue – Fair Elections Center [21] Web – Four Things to Know about Noncitizen Voting [22] Web – Unpacking Myths About Noncitizen Voting — How Heritage … [23] Web – Explainer: Noncitizen Voting in U.S. Elections | migrationpolicy.org