A prominent legal scholar dismantles a progressive congresswoman’s claim that America’s Founders waged war against wealth itself, exposing a dangerous rewriting of history to justify modern socialist policies. Rewriting History to Justify Modern Agendas Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told students at the University of Chicago Institute of Politics that the American Revolution was fought against “the billionaires of their time,” casting the Founders as champions of wealth redistribution. George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley challenged this narrative in a Fox News opinion piece, calling it a “socialist myth” that distorts the historical record. The disagreement represents more than academic quibbling; it exposes how politicians manipulate America’s founding story to justify policies that many believe contradict the principles on which the nation was built. The Founders’ Actual Economic Philosophy Historical evidence contradicts Ocasio-Cortez’s characterization of the Founders as anti-wealth revolutionaries. Robert Morris, known as the “Financier of the Revolution,” personally funded much of the war effort with a fortune that inflation adjustments estimate would equal billions today. The Founders embraced Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations,” published in 1776, which advocated free markets and individual economic liberty. Alexander Hamilton and other framers incorporated constitutional protections for contracts and property rights, demonstrating their commitment to capitalism rather than collectivism. The Declaration of Independence itself enshrined the pursuit of happiness, a concept rooted in individual prosperity and economic freedom. Economic Factionalism and Property Rights Under Threat Turley argues that Ocasio-Cortez’s rhetoric promotes “economic factionalism,” the very danger James Madison warned against in Federalist Paper No. 10. Madison cautioned that allowing majorities to target minorities based on economic status would undermine republican government and lead to what Turley calls “democratic despotism.” Modern proposals for billionaire taxes in states like California and from federal legislators like Bernie Sanders echo policies that drove capital flight in other nations. France’s 2012-2014 supertax on the wealthy resulted in approximately 60,000 millionaires leaving the country, demonstrating the practical consequences of confiscatory taxation policies that discourage investment and entrepreneurship. The Real Revolution: Individual Liberty Over Collective Control The American Revolution challenged British monarchy’s fusion of government power with aristocratic privilege, not the existence of private wealth itself. Jefferson and Madison opposed concentrated power that prevented ordinary citizens from economic advancement through merit and effort. Turley emphasizes that the Founders “believed in unleashing everyone’s ability to become a Morris,” creating conditions for upward mobility rather than tearing down those who succeeded. This distinction matters because it reveals fundamentally different visions of America: one that rewards initiative and protects property rights versus one that views wealth as inherently suspect and subject to redistribution by government decree. Cubs co-owner Todd Ricketts joined Fox News to critique Ocasio-Cortez’s statements, representing business leaders concerned that anti-capitalist rhetoric will shape policy in ways that harm economic growth and job creation. The debate continues as America approaches its 250th anniversary in 2026, making accurate understanding of founding principles increasingly important. Both conservatives frustrated with socialist overreach and liberals concerned about wealth inequality deserve honest historical analysis rather than politically convenient fiction. When elected officials distort the past to advance present agendas, they undermine the shared understanding of national identity that holds diverse viewpoints together, leaving citizens to wonder whether anyone in Washington prioritizes truth over political advantage. Sources: JONATHAN TURLEY: AOC’s war on billionaires twists America’s birth into a socialist myth – Fox News Opinion Jonathan Turley – jonathanturley.org

A grenade-type improvised explosive device was discovered underwater at a major Alabama dam, threatening the drinking water supply for an entire city. The unprecedented find has authorities calling for immediate inspections of critical infrastructure nationwide.Discovery During Routine MaintenanceOn May 12, maintenance divers conducting routine inspections at the Converse Reservoir Dam in Mobile, Alabama, discovered the explosive device submerged near the dam structure. The Mobile Area Water and Sewer System immediately contacted the Mobile County Sheriff’s Office, triggering a coordinated response involving five agencies. The Gulf Coast Regional Maritime Response and Render-Safe Team successfully retrieved and safely detonated the device, preventing potential catastrophic damage to the city’s water infrastructure. Multi-Agency Response Prevents DisasterThe FBI Bomb Squad, Mobile Police Department Explosive Ordinance Detail, ALEA Bomb Squad, Mobile County Sheriff’s Office, and Daphne Search and Rescue Team worked together to neutralize the threat. MAWSS Director Bud McCrory called it an “unprecedented threat” and praised the quick thinking of contractors and divers. He emphasized the device could have caused serious damage to the water supply or harmed individuals if left undiscovered. The Department of Homeland Security has been notified, though neither DHS nor the FBI has issued public statements.National Security ImplicationsThe discovery raises urgent questions about the vulnerability of American infrastructure. Authorities have not identified any suspects or determined a motive for placing the explosive at the dam. The incident underscores the critical need for comprehensive inspections of dams, bridges, and other infrastructure nationwide. Security experts are now calling for immediate security assessments at similar facilities across the country. The fact that a potentially deadly device sat undetected underwater at a major water source represents a significant national security concern that demands swift action from federal and state authorities.SourcesTownhall: Unprecedented Threat: Routine Maintenance Found an IED at an Alabama Dam

A Eugene Police Department officer resigned immediately after bodycam footage captured him making controversial statements about immigrant communities during January anti-ICE protests. The seven-year veteran’s departure came within hours of the video going viral, sparking debate about free speech, law enforcement standards, and departmental culture. What the Bodycam Captured Officer Martin Siller’s bodycam recorded him during a January 30 phone call while responding to protests and riots outside Eugene’s old federal building. The footage shows Siller expressing strong support for Immigration and Customs Enforcement while criticizing Somali and Latino communities. He also made disparaging remarks about anti-ICE protesters, suggesting they were unemployed. The video remained internal for months before surfacing online over the weekend, immediately triggering widespread attention and calls for accountability from community members. Police Chief’s Response Eugene Police Chief Chris Skinner publicly identified Siller after the footage went viral and condemned his remarks as deeply offensive. The chief stated Siller resigned before the department could launch a formal internal investigation. Skinner argued the quick resignation actually demonstrates the department’s anti-racist culture, claiming officers who hold such views don’t feel protected within the organization. He announced an independent investigation to determine if other officers were aware of or involved in the conversation captured on bodycam. Career Background and Ongoing Investigation Siller spent seven years with Eugene Police after serving 20 years with West Valley City Police Department in Utah. The phone conversation captured on bodycam reportedly involved another officer from Grantsville, Utah, who now faces internal investigation by his own department. Chief Skinner has released additional bodycam clips from January 30 as part of the ongoing review. The incident raises questions about vetting processes and whether similar views exist among other officers who haven’t been caught on camera. What This Means The case highlights tensions between officers’ private beliefs and public duties, especially during politically charged protests. While some argue private comments shouldn’t end careers, others contend such views undermine public trust and fair policing. The chief’s assertion that rapid resignation proves departmental integrity remains controversial. Critics question whether the culture truly rejects such attitudes or simply punishes those who get caught. The independent investigation may reveal whether this represents an isolated incident or broader cultural issues within the department. Sources The Gateway Pundit: Oregon Cop Forced to Resign After Bodycam Caught Him Privately Saying ‘F*ck the Somali and Latino Communities, I’m About America!’ While Responding to Anti-ICE Riots

Senator Rand Paul’s son William unleashed a drunken, antisemitic tirade at a Republican congressman on Capitol Hill, spotlighting the explosive donor-fueled civil war tearing the GOP apart from within. Drunken Confrontation Exposes GOP Fault Lines William Paul, son of Senator Rand Paul, interrupted a Capitol Hill bar conversation on the evening of May 12, 2026, launching into an alcohol-fueled rant witnessed by a NOTUS reporter. Paul targeted Rep. Mike Lawler of New York, falsely assuming he was Jewish and blaming “your people” for the primary challenges facing Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky. When Lawler corrected him, Paul continued his tirade, calling Jewish supporters “anti-American” and fixated on Israel rather than American interests. The confrontation escalated when Paul shoved his finger in Lawler’s face and flipped him off after being called antisemitic, before admitting “I’m just really drunk” and stumbling over his barstool on his way out. Rand Paul’s Son Drunkenly Accosted GOP Congressman in Anti-Semitic Rant Before Tripping Over His Own Barstool #Mediaite https://t.co/eXIitk6vcM — #TuckFrump (@realTuckFrumper) May 13, 2026 Donor Wars Fuel Primary Battle The incident reflects intensifying Republican infighting over foreign policy and donor influence. GOP megadonor Paul Singer, through his super PAC, has poured over $750,000 into opposing Massie’s reelection bid, criticizing the congressman’s skepticism toward Ukraine aid and Israel support. Massie represents the libertarian-populist wing alongside Rand Paul, advocating an “America First” approach that puts them at odds with establishment Republicans like Lawler who maintain strong pro-Israel positions. William Paul’s rant echoed talking points from Tucker Carlson and other voices questioning whether certain donors prioritize foreign interests over American ones. This donor-versus-grassroots dynamic has become a defining fault line in Republican politics, with primary battles serving as proxy wars for competing visions of conservatism. Pattern of Elite Interference Frustrates Voters The confrontation crystallizes growing frustration among Americans across the political spectrum who believe wealthy donors wield disproportionate influence over elected representatives. Paul Singer’s massive spending to defeat Massie exemplifies how megadonors can target lawmakers who refuse to align with establishment priorities, regardless of their constituents’ preferences. This pattern reinforces the perception that Washington serves the wealthy and connected rather than ordinary citizens. Whether from the populist right or progressive left, voters increasingly see primary challenges funded by outside money as attempts to silence independent voices and enforce ideological conformity. The fact that this dispute erupted in a Capitol Hill bar, fueled by alcohol and witnessed by media, only deepens cynicism about how disconnected political elites have become from the values and struggles of everyday Americans. New: Sen. Rand Paul’s son drunkenly accosted and hurled anti-Semitic insults at Rep. Mike Lawler at a Capitol Hill bar on Tuesday night. His son told Lawler that if Rep Thomas Massie loses, it’s going to be because of “your people.” “My people?” Lawler asked Paul. “Yeah, you… — Reese Gorman (@reesejgorman) May 13, 2026 Political Fallout Threatens Paul Family Brand The incident poses immediate embarrassment for Senator Rand Paul, whose son’s behavior contradicts the principled libertarian image the family has cultivated. With Massie’s primary scheduled for May 20, 2026, just one week after the story broke, the controversy risks energizing establishment-aligned voters or alternatively galvanizing Massie’s grassroots base against perceived donor interference. Neither Rand Paul nor William Paul issued statements following the NOTUS report’s publication on May 13, leaving the story to dominate social media with the hashtag #RandPaulSon trending. For Rep. Lawler, the confrontation positions him as a victim of bigotry, potentially strengthening his standing among moderate Republicans and Jewish donors. The broader impact extends beyond individual careers, highlighting how family members of prominent politicians can become lightning rods that expose uncomfortable truths about factional divisions within their parties. If I am reading the story right Mr. Paul went on this drunken antisemitic rant at Lawler, who is not Jewish, while @reesejgorman was just sitting next to him at the bar https://t.co/X7QvG4dLii — Aaron Fritschner (@Fritschner) May 13, 2026 As the Massie primary approaches, this Capitol Hill bar brawl has transformed from an embarrassing personal incident into a symbol of the GOP’s internal struggle. The questions it raises about donor influence, loyalty to America versus foreign interests, and the power of wealthy elites to shape elections resonate far beyond Kentucky’s Fourth Congressional District. Regardless of political affiliation, Americans watching this spectacle unfold can recognize a familiar pattern: powerful interests fighting to control the direction of their party while ordinary voters wonder whether anyone in Washington truly represents them. The image of William Paul tripping over his barstool while fleeing his own antisemitic outburst may be darkly comedic, but it reflects the stumbling dysfunction of a political class increasingly unable to address the concerns that matter most to struggling families nationwide. Sources: Sen. Rand Paul’s Son William Hurled Antisemitic Insults at Rep. Mike Lawler Rand Paul’s Son Hurled Antisemitic Insults at Mike Lawler

A Texas high school student documented 55 incidents of censorship against his conservative club while administrators welcomed Islamic groups distributing religious materials to students during lunch periods. Marco Hunter-Lopez, a 16-year-old sophomore at Wylie East High School, revealed systematic bias favoring Islamic organizations over student conservatives.Conservative Club Faced Months of RoadblocksHunter-Lopez founded the Wylie East High School Republican Student Club but encountered obstacles other student groups never experienced. School administrators delayed approval for months, removed his club posters while he traveled, and subjected him to hostile questioning about his activities. The documented incidents span from August 2024 through early 2025, showing a consistent pattern of administrative interference with conservative student expression. Islamic Groups Operated Without RestrictionsWhile conservative students faced roadblocks, the Muslim Student Association and Why Islam organization set up tables in the school lunchroom. These groups distributed Qurans with conversion information, Understanding Shariah pamphlets, and hijabs to students. The Why Islam organization maintains ties to the Islamic Circle of North America. School administrators approved these activities without the delays or scrutiny applied to the Republican club.Principal Participated in Islamic ActivitiesPrincipal Tiffany Doolan actively participated in World Hijab Day celebrations for two consecutive years. She posted photographs of herself wearing Islamic head coverings and expressed enthusiasm for the experience on social media. The school provides halal meal options, designated prayer space for Muslim students, and placed Qurans in at least one district middle school library. No comparable Christian materials or accommodations appear available to students of other faiths.Questions About Equal TreatmentThe contrasting treatment raises concerns about viewpoint discrimination in public schools. Federal law requires public schools maintain religious neutrality and protect student speech rights. When administrators restrict conservative political clubs while promoting religious activities, they create an unequal environment. Hunter-Lopez’s documentation provides specific dates and incidents showing how school policies applied differently based on ideological content. Texas taxpayers fund these schools, making equal treatment and constitutional compliance essential requirements for all student groups.SourcesThe Gateway Pundit: 16-Year-Old Texas Student EXPOSES Woke High School’s War on Conservative Kids – SILENCING Republicans While Openly Promoting Sharia Law and Islam