The most famous fake newscaster in television history just confessed that being left out of his own show’s 50th birthday party flat-out hurt. The man who built Weekend Update, watching from the sidelines Chevy Chase does not usually admit pain. The original “Weekend Update” anchor, the man who made “I’m Chevy Chase, and you’re not” a national catchphrase in 1975, now says that watching the “SNL50: The Anniversary Special” without being invited on stage with his fellow originals was “kind of upsetting” and, more bluntly, that “it hurt.” He sat in the audience while Garrett Morris and Laraine Newman walked up, wondering why no one had asked him to join them. He spells it out in the CNN documentary “I’m Chevy Chas,e and You’re Not.” At 82, he finally says what millions of viewers probably assumed: that of course he expected to stand under the lights with the others who built the show from nothing. He was the first face of “Weekend Update,” a centerpiece of the debut season, and later hosted the show eight times between 1978 and 1997. From a common-sense standpoint, excluding that kind of legacy from the main anniversary stage looks less like an oversight and more like a deliberate decision. Chevy Chase calls out #SNL for excluding him from the 50th anniversary celebration earlier this year. “Well, it was kind of upsetting actually. This is probably the first time I’m saying it. But I expected that I would’ve been on the stage too with all the other actors. When… pic.twitter.com/hpaiLfYhbY — Variety (@Variety) December 23, 2025 Promises made, bits planned, and then the quiet no The documentary makes clear this was not some scheduling mix‑up. Chase’s wife, Jayni, says people told him “up until that day” that he had two possible “bits” in play and that producers were still going back and forth. Then, suddenly, the answer changed to a flat “no, there’s no bit.” Anyone over 40 who has spent a career watching corporate decision‑making will recognize that pattern: promises, hedging, then a silent reversal no one wants to own in public. Lorne Michaels does not deny any of this. He confirms that multiple versions of the “Weekend Update” segment included Chevy and that they went “back and forth” on those drafts. Then he adds the quiet grenade: there was “a caution from somebody that I don’t want to name that Chevy, you know, wasn’t as focused.” That single phrase neatly shifts responsibility away from the institution to an unnamed adviser and, by implication, to Chase himself. For viewers who value transparency and loyalty, the anonymity feels like classic big‑show politics. A legacy of brilliance, abrasiveness, and unfiltered honesty Chase’s mixed reputation hangs over every frame. He has long been described as difficult, sharp‑tongued, and unwilling to play the gracious elder statesman. The doc repeats a story from director Jason Reitman about Chevy’s reaction to Reitman’s 2024 film “Saturday Night,” which painstakingly recreates the 90 minutes before the first “SNL” broadcast. After watching a movie that tried hard to humanize him, Chevy patted Reitman on the shoulder and said, “Well, you should be embarrassed.” From a comedy standpoint, that line is pure Chevy. From a relationship standpoint, it is career napalm. Reitman admits that part of him admired the moment as a perfectly distilled Chevy Chase bit. In contrast, another part of him remembered he had spent two years trying to capture the man’s humanity and capacity to be loved. Chase did not mention any of that. Fans who grew up on “National Lampoon’s Vacation” and “Fletch” will recognize this duality: a performer whose instinct for the funniest, most wrong thing to say can delight an audience and alienate collaborators in the same breath. The conservative question: honor the institution or the individual? The “SNL50” snub raises a simple values question: should institutions honor the contribution, even when they no longer like the contributor? From a traditional American conservative and common‑sense lens, respecting the people who built something is non‑negotiable. Chase was in Studio 8H when the risk was real, and the show might have failed. He helped define “Weekend Update” as a fake newscast sharp enough to skewer power every week, a format that still prints money and ratings fifty years later. That history does not excuse every alleged bad behavior over the decades, and no one in the documentary pretends Chevy has always played nicely. But sidelining a founding figure at the biggest milestone event sends a clear message to the modern industry: personal friction and internal politics can outweigh gratitude and merit. Many viewers who value forgiveness, blunt speech, and honoring elders will see that as backwards. Chase himself sums it up with painful simplicity: “Somebody’s made a bad mistake there… They should’ve had me on that stage. It hurt.” The laughter he once generated for millions cannot quite drown that out. Chevy Chase and his "friends" on SNL 1981 pic.twitter.com/FOLzwt1H3y — Hollywood Horror Museum (@horrormuseum) October 25, 2025 Sources: Chevy Chase admits it was a mistake to leave ‘SNL’ doc Chevy Chase taunted ‘National Lampoon’s Vacation’ co-star on set Chevy Chase attends ‘SNL 50’ after Bill Murray feud, slamming show ‘Saturday Night’ review: A madcap backstage ode to Lorne Michaels’ legendary show

A bold new operation targets criminal illegal aliens, reaffirming America’s resolve to protect its citizens. Operation “Angel’s Honor”: A Symbol of Justice and Safety The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) executed an impactful 14-day operation called “Angel’s Honor,” culminating in the arrest of over 1,030 criminal illegal aliens. Conducted nationwide during the 2025 Christmas season, this operation was a tribute to Laken Riley, a Georgia nursing student tragically murdered by Jose Ibarra, a Venezuelan illegal alien. These arrests targeted some of the most dangerous offenders, including child rapists and torturers, who had previously evaded justice due to lax policies. Knowledge is King: Christmastime ICE Operation ‘Angel’s Honor’ nets child rapist, torturer. We can never bring Laken back, but we can do everything in our power to bring these heinous criminals to justice. Trump "empowered us to arrest and remove the millions of violent criminal… — Conservative American (@honor_country) December 24, 2025 The Laken Riley Act: A Legislative Milestone in Immigration Enforcement The operation’s success rests heavily on the Laken Riley Act, passed with bipartisan support and signed by President Trump. This legislation mandates the detention of non-citizens charged with serious crimes, ensuring they do not escape accountability. It was a direct response to the failures of previous administrations, which allowed violent criminals to remain in the U.S. under inadequate enforcement policies. This act marks a pivotal shift in addressing the immigration crisis with determination and clarity. Impacts and Implications for American Society In the short term, the removal of these criminal elements significantly reduces the risk of street violence and enhances public safety. Long-term implications include deterring future illegal entries and reinforcing the rule of law. This operation is a testament to the Trump administration’s commitment to protecting American families and upholding the values of justice and security. ICE and DHS leadership, including Secretary Kristi Noem and Acting Director Todd Lyons, have been praised for their roles in executing this critical mission. The operation also highlights the importance of strong immigration enforcement policies in maintaining national security. By prioritizing the removal of the “worst of the worst,” the administration delivers on its promise to safeguard American communities from those who wish to do harm. National operation, Angel's Honor. 14 days. Over 1,000 illegal aliens detained. In honor of Laken Riley whose life was taken by a violent, criminal illegal alien. ICE’s mission is to ensure that no more Americans will fall victim to illegal alien crime. pic.twitter.com/2uRB2bVbHj — U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (@ICEgov) December 23, 2025 Sources: Christmastime ICE Operation ‘Angel’s Honor’ nets child rapist, torturer Christmastime ICE Operation ‘Angel’s Honor’ nets child rapist, torturer ICE officers injured by illegal immigrant

Newly released FBI documents reveal Jeffrey Epstein’s brother officially accused President Trump of authorizing his brother’s murder in federal custody, delivering one of the most explosive allegations ever recorded against a sitting president. Brother’s Explosive Murder Allegation Against Trump Mark Epstein submitted a written tip through the FBI’s National Threat Operations Center on February 22, 2023, stating he believed Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in his Manhattan jail cell because he was about to “name names.” The tip explicitly stated Mark’s belief that “President Trump authorized his murder,” suggesting a White House-level conspiracy to silence Jeffrey. This extraordinary allegation remained buried in FBI files until late 2025, when the DOJ released it as part of ongoing Epstein document transparency requirements. The FBI marked Mark’s tip as non-emergency with no active threat to life, and there is no public indication that the Bureau found evidence corroborating his allegation. Despite the gravity of accusing a former president of authorizing murder in federal custody, authorities continue to classify Epstein’s 2019 death as suicide by hanging, according to the NYC medical examiner’s determination. Documented Trump-Epstein Connection Raises Questions The allegation gains significance given Trump’s documented social and business relationship with Epstein throughout the 1990s and early 2000s. Documents show Trump flew on Epstein’s private jet at least eight times between 1993 and 1996, with Ghislaine Maxwell present on some flights. This relationship occurred during the period when Epstein was building his network of powerful connections that would later fuel suspicions about who might have wanted him silenced. Trump later publicly distanced himself from Epstein, claiming they had a “falling out” and denying knowledge of his crimes. However, Epstein’s July 2019 arrest on federal sex trafficking charges involving minors raised the stakes for potential revelations about his network of powerful associates. His subsequent death in custody removed a central witness who possessed damaging information about numerous high-profile figures. Federal Custody Failures Enable Conspiracy Theories Epstein’s death occurred at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan, a facility later exposed for severe security and staffing failures. Investigations uncovered guard failures, falsified logs, camera malfunctions, and poor preservation of the cell as a potential crime scene. These institutional breakdowns provided fertile ground for conspiracy theories about whether influential figures orchestrated Epstein’s death to prevent damaging testimony. The persistent “Epstein didn’t kill himself” narrative reflects widespread public distrust in official explanations, particularly given Epstein’s extensive connections to political and business elites. Mark Epstein’s formal FBI tip represents the most direct accusation yet from Jeffrey’s immediate family, elevating suspicions from anonymous conspiracy communities to documented allegations within official law enforcement records. This development undermines public confidence in federal institutions’ ability to protect high-risk detainees and conduct thorough investigations of powerful figures. Sources: ‘Had Motive To Kill’: Trump Accused Of Authorising Epstein’s Murder, Brother’s Shocking Claim Latest Epstein files release shows scope of DOJ probe Epstein’s brother makes a huge claim on how the billionaire really died. Epstein’s Brother’s Wild Trump FBI Tip Revealed

A controversial 60 Minutes segment on Trump’s immigration policy was mysteriously pulled from broadcast but has now leaked online, raising serious questions about media censorship and journalistic independence. Network Censorship Sparks Controversy CBS’s 60 Minutes made the stunning decision to pull a prepared segment examining President Trump’s immigration policies just before broadcast. The last-minute editorial decision has ignited fierce debate about whether the network succumbed to political pressure or internal bias. This represents another troubling example of mainstream media’s willingness to suppress stories that might present conservative policies in a fair light, undermining their credibility with American viewers. https://twitter.com/CalltoActivism/status/2003307383066653144 Leaked Content Reveals Network Concerns Despite CBS’s attempt to bury the story, the controversial segment has surfaced online this week, allowing viewers to see what the network didn’t want them to witness. The leaked footage provides insight into the editorial process and raises questions about what specifically triggered the network’s decision to spike the piece. For conservatives who have long suspected media manipulation, this incident provides concrete evidence of how news organizations control narratives by selectively censoring content. Journalistic Independence Under Fire The 60 Minutes controversy highlights a broader crisis in American journalism where editorial decisions appear increasingly driven by political considerations rather than news value. This incident follows a pattern of mainstream media outlets suppressing or downplaying stories that don’t align with their preferred narratives. The willingness to pull completed segments demonstrates how far some news organizations will go to avoid presenting information that challenges their audience’s preconceptions or supports conservative viewpoints. Media Credibility Crisis Deepens This latest scandal further erodes public trust in traditional news sources, particularly among conservative Americans who have witnessed years of biased coverage. The fact that the segment leaked online despite network censorship shows how difficult it has become for media gatekeepers to completely control information flow in the digital age. Americans deserve transparent journalism that presents all sides of important policy debates, not selective reporting designed to advance political agendas at the expense of factual accuracy.

Former January 6 defendants are now walking the halls of the Department of Justice, seeking revenge against the prosecutors who put them behind bars. From Defendants to Accusers The transformation has been swift and stunning. Individuals who once sat in federal courtrooms as defendants, facing charges for their actions on January 6, 2021, have emerged from Trump’s mass pardons with a new mission. They are no longer content to walk free simply; they want their former prosecutors held accountable through the same legal system that once pursued them. Reuters investigation reveals these pardoned individuals have successfully secured meetings with Justice Department officials. The access they have gained raises questions about how the department prioritizes its resources and whether prosecutorial decisions should be influenced by those who were previously convicted of federal crimes. Trump's mass pardon of Capitol rioters has led some to gain influence inside the US Justice Department, with pardoned individuals now meeting officials to press for prosecutions of the lawyers who convicted them https://t.co/AwDzAHEkPj pic.twitter.com/u7Im0zE2zj — Reuters (@Reuters) December 17, 2025 The campaign focuses specifically on federal lawyers who worked to build cases against January 6 defendants. These prosecutors followed standard legal procedures, presented evidence to grand juries, and secured convictions through the established judicial process. Now they find themselves in the crosshairs of a coordinated effort to turn the tables. Justice Department’s Precarious Position The willingness of current Justice Department officials to meet with these individuals raises serious concerns about the department’s priorities and independence. Federal prosecutors are sworn to follow the law and evidence, not to pursue cases based on political grievances or personal vendettas from pardoned defendants. Trump granted clemency to every criminally charged Jan. 6 defendant. Now, some of those rioters are meeting with Justice Department officials, pressing for prosecutions of the lawyers and judges who helped put them away https://t.co/11LngNITKg @specialreports pic.twitter.com/X54lhQCxll — Reuters (@Reuters) December 17, 2025 This campaign represents more than just sour grapes from pardoned defendants. It signals an erosion of prosecutorial independence and the rule of law. When federal prosecutors must worry about being targeted for doing their jobs lawfully and ethically, the entire justice system might suffer. The American people deserve a justice system where prosecutors can follow the evidence without fear of political retribution from either side of the aisle.