A Eugene Police Department officer resigned immediately after bodycam footage captured him making controversial statements about immigrant communities during January anti-ICE protests. The seven-year veteran’s departure came within hours of the video going viral, sparking debate about free speech, law enforcement standards, and departmental culture. What the Bodycam Captured Officer Martin Siller’s bodycam recorded him during a January 30 phone call while responding to protests and riots outside Eugene’s old federal building. The footage shows Siller expressing strong support for Immigration and Customs Enforcement while criticizing Somali and Latino communities. He also made disparaging remarks about anti-ICE protesters, suggesting they were unemployed. The video remained internal for months before surfacing online over the weekend, immediately triggering widespread attention and calls for accountability from community members. Police Chief’s Response Eugene Police Chief Chris Skinner publicly identified Siller after the footage went viral and condemned his remarks as deeply offensive. The chief stated Siller resigned before the department could launch a formal internal investigation. Skinner argued the quick resignation actually demonstrates the department’s anti-racist culture, claiming officers who hold such views don’t feel protected within the organization. He announced an independent investigation to determine if other officers were aware of or involved in the conversation captured on bodycam. Career Background and Ongoing Investigation Siller spent seven years with Eugene Police after serving 20 years with West Valley City Police Department in Utah. The phone conversation captured on bodycam reportedly involved another officer from Grantsville, Utah, who now faces internal investigation by his own department. Chief Skinner has released additional bodycam clips from January 30 as part of the ongoing review. The incident raises questions about vetting processes and whether similar views exist among other officers who haven’t been caught on camera. What This Means The case highlights tensions between officers’ private beliefs and public duties, especially during politically charged protests. While some argue private comments shouldn’t end careers, others contend such views undermine public trust and fair policing. The chief’s assertion that rapid resignation proves departmental integrity remains controversial. Critics question whether the culture truly rejects such attitudes or simply punishes those who get caught. The independent investigation may reveal whether this represents an isolated incident or broader cultural issues within the department. Sources The Gateway Pundit: Oregon Cop Forced to Resign After Bodycam Caught Him Privately Saying ‘F*ck the Somali and Latino Communities, I’m About America!’ While Responding to Anti-ICE Riots

Senator Rand Paul’s son William unleashed a drunken, antisemitic tirade at a Republican congressman on Capitol Hill, spotlighting the explosive donor-fueled civil war tearing the GOP apart from within. Drunken Confrontation Exposes GOP Fault Lines William Paul, son of Senator Rand Paul, interrupted a Capitol Hill bar conversation on the evening of May 12, 2026, launching into an alcohol-fueled rant witnessed by a NOTUS reporter. Paul targeted Rep. Mike Lawler of New York, falsely assuming he was Jewish and blaming “your people” for the primary challenges facing Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky. When Lawler corrected him, Paul continued his tirade, calling Jewish supporters “anti-American” and fixated on Israel rather than American interests. The confrontation escalated when Paul shoved his finger in Lawler’s face and flipped him off after being called antisemitic, before admitting “I’m just really drunk” and stumbling over his barstool on his way out. Rand Paul’s Son Drunkenly Accosted GOP Congressman in Anti-Semitic Rant Before Tripping Over His Own Barstool #Mediaite https://t.co/eXIitk6vcM — #TuckFrump (@realTuckFrumper) May 13, 2026 Donor Wars Fuel Primary Battle The incident reflects intensifying Republican infighting over foreign policy and donor influence. GOP megadonor Paul Singer, through his super PAC, has poured over $750,000 into opposing Massie’s reelection bid, criticizing the congressman’s skepticism toward Ukraine aid and Israel support. Massie represents the libertarian-populist wing alongside Rand Paul, advocating an “America First” approach that puts them at odds with establishment Republicans like Lawler who maintain strong pro-Israel positions. William Paul’s rant echoed talking points from Tucker Carlson and other voices questioning whether certain donors prioritize foreign interests over American ones. This donor-versus-grassroots dynamic has become a defining fault line in Republican politics, with primary battles serving as proxy wars for competing visions of conservatism. Pattern of Elite Interference Frustrates Voters The confrontation crystallizes growing frustration among Americans across the political spectrum who believe wealthy donors wield disproportionate influence over elected representatives. Paul Singer’s massive spending to defeat Massie exemplifies how megadonors can target lawmakers who refuse to align with establishment priorities, regardless of their constituents’ preferences. This pattern reinforces the perception that Washington serves the wealthy and connected rather than ordinary citizens. Whether from the populist right or progressive left, voters increasingly see primary challenges funded by outside money as attempts to silence independent voices and enforce ideological conformity. The fact that this dispute erupted in a Capitol Hill bar, fueled by alcohol and witnessed by media, only deepens cynicism about how disconnected political elites have become from the values and struggles of everyday Americans. New: Sen. Rand Paul’s son drunkenly accosted and hurled anti-Semitic insults at Rep. Mike Lawler at a Capitol Hill bar on Tuesday night. His son told Lawler that if Rep Thomas Massie loses, it’s going to be because of “your people.” “My people?” Lawler asked Paul. “Yeah, you… — Reese Gorman (@reesejgorman) May 13, 2026 Political Fallout Threatens Paul Family Brand The incident poses immediate embarrassment for Senator Rand Paul, whose son’s behavior contradicts the principled libertarian image the family has cultivated. With Massie’s primary scheduled for May 20, 2026, just one week after the story broke, the controversy risks energizing establishment-aligned voters or alternatively galvanizing Massie’s grassroots base against perceived donor interference. Neither Rand Paul nor William Paul issued statements following the NOTUS report’s publication on May 13, leaving the story to dominate social media with the hashtag #RandPaulSon trending. For Rep. Lawler, the confrontation positions him as a victim of bigotry, potentially strengthening his standing among moderate Republicans and Jewish donors. The broader impact extends beyond individual careers, highlighting how family members of prominent politicians can become lightning rods that expose uncomfortable truths about factional divisions within their parties. If I am reading the story right Mr. Paul went on this drunken antisemitic rant at Lawler, who is not Jewish, while @reesejgorman was just sitting next to him at the bar https://t.co/X7QvG4dLii — Aaron Fritschner (@Fritschner) May 13, 2026 As the Massie primary approaches, this Capitol Hill bar brawl has transformed from an embarrassing personal incident into a symbol of the GOP’s internal struggle. The questions it raises about donor influence, loyalty to America versus foreign interests, and the power of wealthy elites to shape elections resonate far beyond Kentucky’s Fourth Congressional District. Regardless of political affiliation, Americans watching this spectacle unfold can recognize a familiar pattern: powerful interests fighting to control the direction of their party while ordinary voters wonder whether anyone in Washington truly represents them. The image of William Paul tripping over his barstool while fleeing his own antisemitic outburst may be darkly comedic, but it reflects the stumbling dysfunction of a political class increasingly unable to address the concerns that matter most to struggling families nationwide. Sources: Sen. Rand Paul’s Son William Hurled Antisemitic Insults at Rep. Mike Lawler Rand Paul’s Son Hurled Antisemitic Insults at Mike Lawler

A Texas high school student documented 55 incidents of censorship against his conservative club while administrators welcomed Islamic groups distributing religious materials to students during lunch periods. Marco Hunter-Lopez, a 16-year-old sophomore at Wylie East High School, revealed systematic bias favoring Islamic organizations over student conservatives.Conservative Club Faced Months of RoadblocksHunter-Lopez founded the Wylie East High School Republican Student Club but encountered obstacles other student groups never experienced. School administrators delayed approval for months, removed his club posters while he traveled, and subjected him to hostile questioning about his activities. The documented incidents span from August 2024 through early 2025, showing a consistent pattern of administrative interference with conservative student expression. Islamic Groups Operated Without RestrictionsWhile conservative students faced roadblocks, the Muslim Student Association and Why Islam organization set up tables in the school lunchroom. These groups distributed Qurans with conversion information, Understanding Shariah pamphlets, and hijabs to students. The Why Islam organization maintains ties to the Islamic Circle of North America. School administrators approved these activities without the delays or scrutiny applied to the Republican club.Principal Participated in Islamic ActivitiesPrincipal Tiffany Doolan actively participated in World Hijab Day celebrations for two consecutive years. She posted photographs of herself wearing Islamic head coverings and expressed enthusiasm for the experience on social media. The school provides halal meal options, designated prayer space for Muslim students, and placed Qurans in at least one district middle school library. No comparable Christian materials or accommodations appear available to students of other faiths.Questions About Equal TreatmentThe contrasting treatment raises concerns about viewpoint discrimination in public schools. Federal law requires public schools maintain religious neutrality and protect student speech rights. When administrators restrict conservative political clubs while promoting religious activities, they create an unequal environment. Hunter-Lopez’s documentation provides specific dates and incidents showing how school policies applied differently based on ideological content. Texas taxpayers fund these schools, making equal treatment and constitutional compliance essential requirements for all student groups.SourcesThe Gateway Pundit: 16-Year-Old Texas Student EXPOSES Woke High School’s War on Conservative Kids – SILENCING Republicans While Openly Promoting Sharia Law and Islam

A Vietnamese national convicted of attempting to murder a police officer walked free in American communities for over 15 years because his home country refused to accept him back. That changed on May 5, 2026, when Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents took Dinh Quy Nguyen into custody in Houston, Texas, marking a significant shift in U.S. deportation enforcement under the Trump administration. Criminal History Spanning Decades Nguyen’s violent record dates back to June 28, 1989, when he was convicted of attempted capital murder of a police officer and burglary. Despite receiving a final deportation order in December 1997, confirmed by the Board of Immigration Appeals in May 1998, Nguyen remained in the United States. He was released from ICE custody in June 2011 after Vietnam refused repatriation, leaving him effectively untouchable under previous diplomatic agreements. Homeland Security @DHSgov .@ICEgov has ARRESTED Dinh Quy Nguyen, a criminal illegal alien from Vietnam, who was convicted of attempted murder of a POLICE OFFICER in 1989. After being taken into ICE custody in 2011, Nguyen was released and allowed to roam free in our communities due to a previous 3:35 PM · May 13, 2026 Protected by Diplomatic Loophole Under a longstanding agreement between the United States and Vietnam, Vietnamese citizens who arrived before July 12, 1995, could not be forcibly deported. Nguyen entered the country on December 15, 1977, placing him squarely within this protected window. For over a decade, immigration officials considered him beyond reach despite his violent criminal conviction. Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis emphasized the timing during Police Week, stating ICE law enforcement removed this convicted criminal to prevent further victimization of Americans. Policy Shift Under Trump Administration The arrest represents a dramatic change in enforcement priorities under President Donald Trump and Secretary of Homeland Security Markwayne Mullin. Department of Homeland Security officials say recent policy changes target longstanding barriers that previously allowed convicted criminals to remain in the United States. Nguyen first entered through Honolulu, Hawaii, and was transferred from the Texas Department of Criminal Justice to ICE custody in March 2011 before his release three months later. What Happens Next Nguyen is currently detained at the Montgomery Processing Center in Conroe, Texas, pending his removal to Vietnam. The Department of Homeland Security says this renewed enforcement effort ensures heinous criminals can no longer remain free due to diplomatic technicalities. The case highlights how international agreements can shield violent offenders from deportation, even when they pose clear threats to public safety. Immigration officials now appear willing to challenge previous diplomatic constraints to remove dangerous criminals from American communities. Sources Fox News: ICE nabs criminal illegal alien who attempted to murder a cop, escaped deportation for years

Masked men shouting anti-NATO slogans didn’t just “protest” in the Netherlands this week—they allegedly hunted down uniformed alliance personnel and turned it violent. Attack Near NATO Facility Triggers Security-Focused Investigation Dutch authorities are investigating an assault on two German soldiers stationed at NATO’s Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC) headquarters in Brunssum, a town in the Netherlands’ Limburg province. Reports say a group of mask-wearing men shouted anti-NATO slogans and then escalated into verbal and physical violence. The German Defense Ministry confirmed the incident via the dpa wire service, describing minor injuries and classifying the case as a “security-related incident.” Key facts remain limited in public reporting, including the precise time and exact spot where the assault occurred and how many attackers were involved. What is clear is the investigative posture: Dutch police and military police are treating motive as central, not incidental. That matters because an ideologically driven assault near a NATO site raises different security questions than a random street crime, especially when service members appear to have been targeted. What JAPCC Is—and Why Brunssum Matters to NATO JAPCC, established in 2004, supports NATO air operations and related planning. Brunssum is not a symbolic outpost; it is part of the alliance’s operational backbone and sits in a region that hosts a significant NATO presence. The surrounding area reportedly includes roughly 1,500 NATO staff, making local security conditions more than a municipal issue. For alliance nations, the safety of personnel beyond the perimeter fence is a real-world measure of host-nation stability. In practical terms, this kind of incident can quickly force changes in routine: how troops travel off-duty, whether uniforms are worn outside secure zones, and whether patrols and surveillance expand around facilities. The research notes that heightened security is a likely short-term response, although official confirmation of specific measures has not been reported. Absent a public NATO statement, the most concrete information still comes from the German Defense Ministry’s confirmation and the ongoing Dutch investigation. Anti-NATO Activism, Masks, and the Line Between Protest and Violence Europe has long seen anti-NATO activism from pacifist and far-left movements, and the research points to a broader post-2022 context of intensified anti-militarism as the Russia-Ukraine war reshaped defense policy and public debate. The detail that the attackers were masked is not minor. Masks can be used to evade identification and to encourage group intimidation, making it harder for police to deter repeat incidents and harder for democracies to protect lawful protest while punishing political violence. The reporting and research do not definitively identify the perpetrators or prove organizational affiliation. Some comparisons are drawn to “Black Bloc” tactics seen during past European protests, but that remains inference rather than confirmed attribution. That uncertainty is important for readers who are tired of governments and media leaping to conclusions. The strongest factual thread is the anti-NATO slogans combined with the location near a NATO headquarters, which is why investigators appear to be treating political motive as a live possibility. Why This Resonates Beyond Europe—and What to Watch Next For Americans watching from a distance, the incident still lands close to home. The United States remains the central pillar of NATO, and political violence aimed at alliance personnel feeds a broader worry shared by many voters across the spectrum: public order is weakening while institutions argue about labels instead of enforcing basic rules. Conservatives tend to see this as a predictable outcome of permissive protest culture; many liberals worry about extremism too, even if they disagree about which ideologies pose the bigger threat. Police Investigate After NATO Soldiers Attacked by Mask-Wearing, Slogan Shouting Menhttps://t.co/BRL6HzL7Ms — Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) May 13, 2026 The next developments that matter are straightforward: whether Dutch authorities make arrests, whether prosecutors treat the case as ideologically motivated, and whether NATO or the Dutch government announces concrete security changes around Brunssum. If this is confirmed as targeted political violence, it will likely intensify debates over anti-mask rules near sensitive sites and how European democracies balance civil liberties with protecting troops and critical defense infrastructure. For now, the limited public detail is itself a reminder of how quickly security problems can outpace public accountability. Sources: NATO Soldiers Attacked by Mask-Wearing, Slogan Shouting Men German soldiers attacked by gang shouting anti-NATO slogans Breitbart