Kamala Harris teases a 2028 presidential run despite her crushing 2024 defeat to President Trump, signaling Democrats’ refusal to abandon failed leadership. Harris Exits Governor Race, Eyes National Stage On July 31, 2025, Kamala Harris announced she would not seek the governorship of California in 2026. She cited deep reflection and a commitment to Democrat values through new methods outside elected office. This move ended months of speculation tied to Gavin Newsom’s term limits. Instead, Harris hinted at broader ambitions, planning nationwide Democrat support, a book, and a political organization. Her decision shifts attention from state politics to a potential White House return, frustrating conservatives who see it as a dodge of accountability for past failures. Book Tour and DNC Moves Signal 2028 Intent Harris launched her book tour for “107 Days,” detailing her 2024 campaign, starting early 2025. By December 2025, she expanded stops to South Carolina, Jackson (Mississippi), Memphis (Tennessee), and Montgomery (Alabama)—early primary hotspots with strong Black voter bases. At the DNC’s winter meeting in Los Angeles, she criticized bipartisan failures, calling Trump a “symptom” of deeper issues. Attendees chanted “You!” in 2028 encouragement. Spokesperson Kirsten Allen emphasized midterm engagement and future shaping, keeping options open without formal commitment. Polling Strength Amid Electability Concerns Harris leads early 2028 Democrat primary polls, such as Morning Consult, particularly among Black voters—a crucial bloc. She outpaces rivals like Newsom and JB Pritzker. DNC Chair Ken Martin provided subtle boosts at events. Supporters like United Farm Workers showed enthusiasm at a December gala. Yet party insiders question her electability after her 2024 loss to Trump. Axios describes her actions as initial steps toward a campaign, blending optimism from base support with skepticism over broader appeal. Conservatives view this as Democrats clinging to divisive figures. Doug Emhoff, her spouse, gained visibility as a potential “first gentleman.” Rivals like Pritzker fundraised separately, highlighting competition. Harris’s team focuses on midterm travel starting fall 2025 and UFW advocacy. No formal 2028 campaign exists yet, but nationwide efforts sustain viability. This positioning energizes Democrat bases while pressuring competitors. For Trump supporters, it underscores the left’s persistence in promoting leaders tied to open borders, inflation, and woke policies that burdened American families. Impacts on Democrats and 2028 Landscape Harris’s opt-out reshapes California’s 2026 governor race, advancing contenders like Xavier Becerra and Katie Porter. Short-term, it boosts the Democrats’ midterm energy. Long-term, she consolidates anti-Trump forces or fragments the primary field. Black communities see a prominent advocate; rivals face poll pressure. Politically, her “disrupt the status quo” messaging pivots Democrats amid Trump’s successes in securing borders and the economy. Conservatives celebrate Trump’s mandate but remain vigilant against Harris reviving globalist agendas that eroded family values and national sovereignty. Sources: Axios: Kamala Harris president 2028

President Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address delivered a powerful reminder that America’s turnaround under conservative leadership is real, despite the mainstream media’s desperate attempts to downplay achievements that reversed years of disastrous leftist policies. Border Security Victory Vindicates America First Approach Trump’s February 24, 2026 address highlighted dramatic reductions in illegal immigration following executive actions that reversed Biden-era open border disasters. While the President’s claim of “zero illegal aliens” admitted in nine months was overstated, border crossings have indeed plummeted from the historic highs Americans endured under the previous administration. This vindication of common-sense immigration enforcement demonstrates what happens when a president prioritizes American citizens over globalist virtue signaling and special interests that profited from border chaos. Economic Turnaround Restores Working Class Prosperity The President touted rising incomes, returning factories, and reduced inflation as evidence his policies corrected years of fiscal mismanagement and job-killing regulations. Trump emphasized that American workers are finally benefiting after enduring the left’s inflationary spending sprees and energy policies that drove up costs for families. He also announced progress cutting prescription drug prices through direct action, bypassing the pharmaceutical industry’s stranglehold on Washington. This America First economic agenda directly challenges the globalist trade deals and corporate welfare that enriched elites while hollowing out manufacturing communities across the heartland. Fraud Crackdown Targets Blue State Corruption Trump assigned Vice President Vance to lead an aggressive campaign against fraud, specifically calling out corruption in blue states and waste in programs serving communities like Minnesota’s Somali population. This initiative addresses taxpayer frustration with government programs riddled with abuse while hardworking Americans struggle. The administration’s willingness to confront systemic fraud where prior officials looked away represents accountability voters demanded. By focusing on states notorious for lax oversight and pro-crime policies that released repeat offenders, this crackdown signals an end to tolerance for waste and lawlessness that eroded public trust. Housing and Healthcare Reforms Challenge Corporate Control The President called on Congress to permanently ban large investment firms from purchasing single-family homes, a policy implemented last month by executive order. This directly confronts Wall Street’s role in pricing ordinary families out of homeownership, a kitchen-table issue ignored by politicians beholden to corporate donors. Trump also outlined his “Great Healthcare Plan” shifting subsidies from insurance companies to consumers, though specifics remain limited. These proposals challenge entrenched interests that profited under Obamacare’s mandates and regulations, offering instead market-based approaches prioritizing individual choice over government and corporate control of healthcare decisions. Trump’s foreign policy claims of ending eight wars in 10 months drew scrutiny, though ceasefires in conflicts like Armenia-Azerbaijan were credited to his administration’s strength-based diplomacy. The President contrasted his approach with previous administrations that allowed adversaries like Iran to pursue nuclear ambitions unchecked, noting U.S. strikes that damaged Iranian facilities. His emphasis on restoring American respect internationally and pursuing Ukraine peace negotiations reflects voters’ exhaustion with endless foreign entanglements that drained resources while domestic needs went unmet. This reorientation toward American interests over globalist nation-building marks a fundamental shift from decades of foreign policy consensus that failed working families. Sources: Highlights from Trump’s 2026 State of the Union speech – CBS News Fact-checking Trump’s State of the Union address – ABC News

California’s governor is using clemency to collide head-on with federal immigration enforcement—while activists claim the Church is steering the wheel. What Newsom Actually Did—and What the Record Does Not Show Governor Gavin Newsom granted clemency in late 2025 to Psalm Behpoor, a Fresno restaurant manager who was detained by ICE after a June 2025 immigration appointment and held for roughly four months in Bakersfield. The clemency covered a 2004 first-degree residential burglary conviction from when Behpoor was 18, not an attempted-murder case. Claims that Catholic leaders drove this specific pardon remain unverified in the available documentation. Newsom’s clemency materials describe recommendations coming from a mix of law enforcement officers, teachers, elected officials, and other community and religious leaders. The application reportedly arrived in October 2024, with clemency granted more than a year later—timing that suggests a standard review process rather than a rapid-response political stunt. None of the cited reporting provides a clear paper trail showing Catholic leaders as the decisive force behind Behpoor’s specific case. ICE’s Position: State Pardons Don’t Override Federal Immigration Law Federal officials responded bluntly. ICE stated that Behpoor remains “an illegal alien” and said the agency’s mission is to identify and remove “criminal aliens and others” who violate immigration laws. ICE also reiterated a broader standard: any alien in violation of U.S. immigration law may be arrested, detained, and removed if found removable under a final order, regardless of nationality. In practice, that means clemency can complicate a case, but it does not automatically stop deportation. Behpoor’s immigration attorney described the pardon as “not a guarantee,” but as another legal argument to reopen removal proceedings. One key detail matters for readers tracking the policy stakes: reporting indicates Behpoor’s non-aggravated burglary is no longer considered a deportable felony, potentially changing the legal basis for removal. That distinction underscores a recurring national debate—whether decades-old crimes, later reclassified under evolving standards, should permanently bar someone from remaining in the country. Catholic Activism, Courtroom Presence, and Claims of “Religious Freedom” Pressure Separate from Behpoor’s case, Catholic leadership in California has increased visibility around immigration enforcement. Reports describe clergy appearing at immigration court proceedings and, at least temporarily, influencing how migrants are treated and how agents behave. The activism is framed by church leaders as a humanitarian and pastoral response, rooted in the church’s long-standing advocacy for migrants and refugees. For conservatives, the central factual point is that a major institution is actively organizing around enforcement tactics. When Enforcement Meets Worship: The Mass Exemption Controversy In early 2026, a Southern California bishop issued a rare decree excusing Catholics from Sunday Mass amid fears of immigration raids, with advocates describing it as evidence that even churches no longer feel safe. That move injected religious liberty language into a political dispute over enforcement locations and tactics. A White House spokesperson also highlighted a perceived double standard, pointing to pandemic-era church closures as evidence that some officials invoke “religious freedom” selectively when it aligns with immigration activism. From a constitutional perspective, the public record here is mixed and incomplete. The sources describe fear of raids, but they do not establish a universal policy of targeting churches, nor do they provide a definitive account of what enforcement guidelines were in each reported incident. What is clear is the political effect: state and institutional leaders are using the language of faith and freedom to pressure federal agencies, while federal authorities insist they are executing duly enacted law. Sources: Trump’s immigration crackdown prompts California bishop to excuse Catholics from Sunday Mass Officials respond to Governor Gavin Newsom pardon for Fresno manager Gov. Gavin Newsom pardons detained Fresno manager Psalm Behpoor Presence of Catholic leaders at immigration court scatters ICE agents at least temporarily Archbishop Gomez urges calm and restraint as ICE protests erupt in Los Angeles Catholic dioceses respond to ICE raids; wildfire retardant draws scrutiny; Gold Country arts talk Newly appointed Detroit archbishop suggested canonical penalties for Trump immigration officials

California’s governor is using clemency to collide head-on with federal immigration enforcement, while activists claim the Church is steering the wheel. What Newsom Actually Did—and What the Record Does Not Show Governor Gavin Newsom granted clemency in late 2025 to Psalm Behpoor, a Fresno restaurant manager who was detained by ICE after a June 2025 immigration appointment and held for roughly four months in Bakersfield. The clemency covered a 2004 first-degree residential burglary conviction from when Behpoor was 18, not an attempted-murder case. Claims that Catholic leaders drove this specific pardon remain unverified in the available documentation. Newsom’s clemency materials describe recommendations coming from a mix of law enforcement officers, teachers, elected officials, and other community and religious leaders. The application reportedly arrived in October 2024, with clemency granted more than a year later—timing that suggests a standard review process rather than a rapid-response political stunt. None of the cited reporting provides a clear paper trail showing Catholic leaders as the decisive force behind Behpoor’s specific case. ICE’s Position: State Pardons Don’t Override Federal Immigration Law Federal officials responded bluntly. ICE stated that Behpoor remains “an illegal alien” and said the agency’s mission is to identify and remove “criminal aliens and others” who violate immigration laws. ICE also reiterated a broader standard: any alien in violation of U.S. immigration law may be arrested, detained, and removed if found removable under a final order, regardless of nationality. In practice, that means clemency can complicate a case, but it does not automatically stop deportation. Behpoor’s immigration attorney described the pardon as “not a guarantee,” but as another legal argument to reopen removal proceedings. One key detail matters for readers tracking the policy stakes: reporting indicates Behpoor’s non-aggravated burglary is no longer considered a deportable felony, potentially changing the legal basis for removal. That distinction underscores a recurring national debate—whether decades-old crimes, later reclassified under evolving standards, should permanently bar someone from remaining in the country. Catholic Activism, Courtroom Presence, and Claims of “Religious Freedom” Pressure Separate from Behpoor’s case, Catholic leadership in California has increased visibility around immigration enforcement. Reports describe clergy appearing at immigration court proceedings and, at least temporarily, influencing how migrants are treated and how agents behave. The activism is framed by church leaders as a humanitarian and pastoral response, rooted in the church’s long-standing advocacy for migrants and refugees. For conservatives, the central factual point is that a major institution is actively organizing around enforcement tactics. When Enforcement Meets Worship: The Mass Exemption Controversy In early 2026, a Southern California bishop issued a rare decree excusing Catholics from Sunday Mass amid fears of immigration raids, with advocates describing it as evidence that even churches no longer feel safe. That move injected religious liberty language into a political dispute over enforcement locations and tactics. A White House spokesperson also highlighted a perceived double standard, pointing to pandemic-era church closures as evidence that some officials invoke “religious freedom” selectively when it aligns with immigration activism. From a constitutional perspective, the public record here is mixed and incomplete. The sources describe fear of raids, but they do not establish a universal policy of targeting churches, nor do they provide a definitive account of what enforcement guidelines were in each reported incident. What is clear is the political effect: state and institutional leaders are using the language of faith and freedom to pressure federal agencies, while federal authorities insist they are executing duly enacted law. Bottom Line for Voters: A State-Federal Collision With Limited Verified Details The verified facts point to a narrower story than the viral claim suggests. Newsom issued clemency to a man convicted of burglary, not attempted murder, and the documentation credits a broad mix of recommenders rather than identifying Catholic leaders as the driving force. ICE, for its part, is signaling that state clemency will not block removals. With President Trump back in office and enforcement prioritized, the next chapter hinges on courts and motions—not headlines. Limited reporting leaves major questions unanswered, including whether any Catholic organization formally lobbied for Behpoor specifically and whether the removal case will be reopened. Until those records surface, the strongest conclusion conservatives can draw is procedural: governors can issue clemency, but immigration enforcement remains a federal power, and the conflict is likely to intensify when state leaders use pardons to test the boundaries of that authority. Sources: Trump’s immigration crackdown prompts California bishop to excuse Catholics from Sunday Mass Officials respond to Governor Gavin Newsom pardon for Fresno manager Gov. Gavin Newsom pardons detained Fresno manager Psalm Behpoor Presence of Catholic leaders at immigration court scatters ICE agents at least temporarily Archbishop Gomez urges calm and restraint as ICE protests erupt in Los Angeles Catholic dioceses respond to ICE raids; wildfire retardant draws scrutiny; Gold Country arts talk Newly appointed Detroit archbishop suggested canonical penalties for Trump immigration officials

Governor Tim Walz faces explosive accusations of stonewalling congressional investigators probing a jaw-dropping $9 billion fraud scandal that pillaged Minnesota’s social services programs while hardworking American families lost access to critical benefits. Congressional Investigators Hit Resistance Wall Chairman James Comer expanded the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform’s investigation after encountering what investigators characterize as deliberate obstruction from Walz’s administration. The Committee demanded comprehensive documentation from the Minnesota Legislative Auditor regarding the Department of Human Services’ oversight failures. Comer subpoenaed both Governor Walz and Attorney General Keith Ellison to testify at a public hearing scheduled for February 10, 2026, marking an unprecedented federal intervention into state-level corruption. The stonewalling allegations center on missing documents, delayed responses, and incomplete disclosures about when state officials first learned of the massive fraud schemes. Tim Walz lies about past daycare fraud probes. Reporter tracked overbilling (2x kids claimed) at MN daycares years ago—referred to BCA, but no charges filed due to DHS stonewalling. Do you agree that Dems have been protecting scammers? A. YesB. No pic.twitter.com/tvGnWRTM8M —