A long-buried January 6 mystery just took a stunning turn as a 30-year-old Virginian reportedly confessed to planting the infamous D.C. pipe bombs outside both party headquarters. Confession Revives Long-Standing Questions About January 6 Pipe Bombs Law enforcement sources now say a 30-year-old man from Virginia, identified as Brian Cole, was arrested on a Wednesday and confessed the next day to planting two pipe bombs outside the Republican National Committee and Democrat National Committee headquarters on the evening before the January 6, 2021, protests. His reported admission breathes new life into one of the most unsettling unanswered questions from that week and reopens debate about how authorities handled the threat. According to the account now emerging, Cole allegedly placed the devices near both party offices in Washington, D.C., timing the act just hours before massive crowds arrived in the capital to object to the 2020 election certification. For years, images of a masked suspect captured on security cameras circulated with no arrest. The gap between the incident and this confession fuels deep concern among conservatives about investigative priorities and transparency within the federal security apparatus. INESCAPABLE FACT!WHOEVER THE J6 PIPE BOMBER WAS, THEY WAVED AT CAPITOL POLICE. Brian Cole of Virginia is now the ALLEGED J6 pipe bomb suspect.Note: ALLEGED Regardless of suspect, the important fact here is that it WAS an inside job.Attached, are family photos. pic.twitter.com/pxNIav6yAL — Patrick Sharp PolitiClips (@ginsengdrumming) December 4, 2025 Impact on Conservatives and the January 6 Narrative When the pipe bombs were first discovered, federal agencies quickly used the scare to justify sweeping security responses around the Capitol, bolstering the argument that January 6 represented a broad domestic extremism crisis. Many conservatives viewed that framing as an attempt to lump peaceful Trump supporters together with any criminal actors present. The revelation that a single 30-year-old suspect now reportedly admits responsibility highlights how that fear was channeled into narratives that painted millions of law-abiding Americans with the same brush. Constitutionally minded citizens have long warned that conflating targeted criminal acts with peaceful protest opens the door to crackdowns on legitimate speech and assembly. The pipe bomb threat was repeatedly cited to expand surveillance powers and deepen cooperation between federal agencies and tech companies under the banner of combating extremism. With a named suspect now allegedly confessing, many on the right are demanding a full accounting of how that threat was leveraged, and whether policies enacted in its wake still trample First and Fourth Amendment protections for ordinary Americans. Alleged Jan. 6 pipe bomber Brian Cole Jr. has APPEARED in federal court, facing up to 20 YEARS in prison Is this the "white man" CNN was talking about? Cole is charged with transporting an explosive device, and attempted malicious destruction by means of explosive materials.… pic.twitter.com/QJWHdLwh6e — Trumpusa1 (@Trumpusa1A1) December 8, 2025 Federal Response, Delayed Arrest, and Trust in Institutions Conservatives are now asking why it took years after January 6 to identify and arrest a man who reportedly confessed within a day of being taken into custody. The long delay raises questions about investigative priorities during the previous administration, which poured immense resources into tracking down hundreds of defendants linked to protests. At the same time, the pipe bomb case lingered unresolved. For many on the right, that imbalance feeds a perception that federal law enforcement has been more focused on punishing political opposition than resolving a serious bipartisan security threat. That perception matters because trust in institutions forms the backbone of a free republic. When Americans see high-profile, dangerous cases sit unresolved while comparatively minor protest offenses are pursued aggressively, they reasonably wonder whether impartial justice has given way to selective enforcement. The reported confession by Cole should therefore be more than a footnote; it should be a catalyst for a thorough review of how the case was handled, what leads were missed, and whether political considerations influenced the tempo or direction of the investigation. Balancing Security, Civil Liberties, and Equal Justice Under Trump Under the current Trump administration, many conservatives expect a sharp course correction from the prior years of broad-brush “domestic extremism” rhetoric. The Cole confession presents an opportunity to distinguish clearly between those who commit actual violence or plant devices and the vast majority of Americans who exercise their rights peacefully. A transparent, narrowly targeted prosecution focused squarely on the alleged bomber, rather than on political symbolism, would signal a renewed commitment to equal justice and limited government power. Going forward, patriots will be watching closely to see whether this case prompts a rollback of surveillance expansions and political profiling that grew out of January 6. A free people demand real accountability for anyone who plants bombs, but they also insist that no administration exploit such crimes to smear dissent or erode constitutional protections. The handling of Brian Cole’s reported confession will test whether Washington has learned that crucial lesson, or whether old habits of overreach remain deeply entrenched.

A sitting Republican congresswoman now claims Donald Trump “directly fueled” death threats against her family—after she spent years building her career on his movement. MARJORIE TAYLOR GREENE’S BETRAYAL AND THE MEDIA PLOT Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s decision to use the hostile platform of “60 Minutes” to accuse Donald Trump of “directly fueled” death threats against her family is not a confession—it is a devastating act of betrayal of public trust and a calculated maneuver designed to provide the left-wing media with the irrefutable proof they need to destroy the America First movement. By prioritizing a personal feud on prime-time television, Greene has handed the Deep State agenda a massive propaganda victory. This is the ultimate act of institutional subversion. Greene, who built her career on the Trump movement, has chosen to validate the media’s long-standing narrative that strong conservative criticism is equivalent to violence, dangerously blurring the lines between protected political speech and criminal acts. Her narrative conveniently ignores the broader, toxic online environment and the media’s own role in constantly amplifying political conflict. Watch my full interview on 60 Minutes. I’m America First America Only and no one can get in the way of that. pic.twitter.com/MkXAfHvvaU — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) December 8, 2025 ELITE ARROGANCE AND THE CATASTROPHIC FAILURE OF FOCUS Legacy outlets like “60 Minutes” thrive on this intra-party drama, gaining a sympathetic storyline that paints the entire America First movement as reckless and dangerous. This is a deliberate act of regulatory malice, shifting the public’s focus away from critical policy debates—like border chaos, inflation, and executive overreach—and onto Republican personalities warring for the cameras. The media is allowed to present itself as the “responsible adult” while ignoring its own role in fanning partisan flames. Greene’s elite arrogance in taking her dispute to corporate media allies of the left creates a sense of profound betrayal among grassroots conservatives. They see this move less like courage and more like self-preservation at the disastrous cost of the movement’s mission. The catastrophic failure here is the refusal of elected Republicans to stay focused on the core priorities—securing the border, restoring energy dominance, and defending fundamental rights—instead of feeding the media’s appetite for personal grudges. INSTITUTIONAL SUBVERSION: THE DOUBLE STANDARD ON SPEECH The narrative surrounding Greene’s claim exposes the media’s profound double standard. When Democrats face threats (e.g., Justice Brett Kavanaugh), the media frames it as protest gone too far; when a Republican figure criticizes an ally, the media immediately jumps to accusations of “stochastic terrorism.” This dangerous standard is the final shocking plot designed to erode the First Amendment rights of conservatives. The foreseeable catastrophe is that this manufactured drama will be used as a backdoor argument for regulating conservative speech and punishing political opponents for the actions of isolated extremists. The conservative base demands accountability, not performance. Every minute spent on a “60 Minutes” segment is a minute not spent reversing the damage of the last administration.

Federal charging documents reveal the January 6th pipe bomber began purchasing bomb-making materials in June 2020, coinciding with the George Floyd riots and anti-police hysteria—a timeline that exposes the true motivation behind this attack on our democracy. Critical Timeline Reveals True Motivation The federal charging documents paint a damning picture of premeditation that began long before January 6th ever entered public discourse. According to the seven-page criminal complaint affidavit, the suspect made his first pipe purchase on June 1, 2020, followed by kitchen timers on June 3, additional pipes on June 8, end caps on June 20, and safety glasses in July. This wasn’t random collecting—this was a man with a specific plan driven by the radical leftist messaging dominating that summer. Did You Know: The FBI held a meeting with the George Floyd medical examiner before he released the autopsy of Floyd's body The original autopsy showed that Floyd had no physical evidence of asphyxiation pic.twitter.com/KRl58Nuq5l — Jack Posobiec (@JackPosobiec) August 20, 2024 Summer of Riots Sparked Deadly Planning The timing is no coincidence. June 2020 marked the height of Black Lives Matter riots following George Floyd’s death, with burning police precincts, corporate virtue signaling, and wall-to-wall media coverage portraying America as systemically racist. The charging documents show the suspect had been casually purchasing bomb components since October 2019, but the concentrated buying spree began precisely when leftist politicians and media figures were calling police murderers and demanding defunding. This represents a clear radicalization moment that the mainstream media refuses to acknowledge. Methodical Bomb Construction Process Federal investigators tracked the suspect through credit card purchases, cell phone data, and license plate readers, creating an airtight case. The affidavit details how each component met the legal threshold for weapons charges and describes video surveillance capturing the suspect’s movements near the Capitol. Remarkably, the document reveals continued purchases of incendiary device components even after January 6th, suggesting ongoing terrorist intentions. The thorough investigation spanned multiple pages covering everything from the suspect’s height measurements in surveillance footage to precise store locations and timestamps. Biden Administration’s Deliberate Cover-Up The most disturbing aspect isn’t the crime itself—it’s the Biden FBI’s refusal to pursue justice for American patriots. For years, this administration weaponized federal law enforcement against January 6th protesters while deliberately ignoring the pipe bomber who actually threatened lives. The evidence was overwhelming: detailed purchase records, surveillance footage, cell tower data, and physical evidence. Yet Biden’s politicized Justice Department chose to protect a narrative rather than prosecute a terrorist whose actions were likely inspired by their own anti-American rhetoric and policies. Sources: Federal Affidavit in Support of Criminal Complaint – January 6th Pipe Bomber Case

In just 26 days, January’s Supplemental Security Income (SSI) payment will be delivered, marking a significant financial milestone for eligible recipients. Timing of Payments Adjusted for Holidays SSI payments will be issued earlier than usual, on December 31, 2025, because the first of the month falls on a holiday. This adjustment ensures beneficiaries receive their payments without delay, a standard procedure when the first day of a month falls on a weekend or holiday. This scheduling ensures that recipients can plan their finances accurately without the disruption of late payments. SSI payments are crucial for individuals with limited income who are either blind, aged 65 and older, or have qualifying disabilities. The payment amount varies based on several factors, including the number of people filing. Individual filers can receive up to $994, while couples filing jointly may receive $1,491. Those providing essential care to SSI recipients may receive up to $498. These payments are vital for covering basic needs and maintaining a standard quality of life. Social Security recipients who get Supplemental Security Income benefits will get a check on Dec. 1 and will get another on Dec. 31, for January 2026. https://t.co/h2m2BlBsSR — Journal Star (@pjstar) November 28, 2025 Cost-of-Living Adjustment for 2026 The January 2026 payment reflects a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) that increases payments by 2.8% from the previous year. This adjustment is designed to help beneficiaries keep pace with inflation and rising living costs. For individual filers, this means an increase from the prior maximum of $967 to $994. This COLA ensures that the purchasing power of SSI payments remains stable, helping recipients manage their expenses more effectively. SSI eligibility extends beyond financial need. Recipients must be U.S. citizens or noncitizens classified by the Department of Homeland Security as eligible for SSI. Additionally, they must reside in one of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, or the Northern Mariana Islands, and must not be absent from the U.S. for a whole calendar month or 30 consecutive days. These requirements aim to ensure that assistance reaches those who genuinely need it and reside within the country. Impact on Recipients and Broader Implications For many recipients, these payments are a lifeline, providing essential income to cover everyday expenses such as food, housing, and healthcare. The increase from the COLA adjustment is particularly significant given the current economic climate, where inflation has driven up the cost of goods and services. This increase helps alleviate some financial pressure on recipients, supporting their independence and dignity. Understanding the broader implications of such adjustments highlights the importance of SSI in the social safety net. This program plays a critical role in supporting vulnerable populations, ensuring that they have the financial means to lead stable lives. As the economy continues to evolve, these payments and their adjustments are vital to addressing the economic challenges faced by those most in need. Sources: Washington Examiner Social Security Administration – Cost-of-Living Adjustments Social Security Administration – COLA Factsheets Social Security Administration – SSI Calendar

The Minneapolis Police Chief’s recent comments have sparked a debate over potential conflicts between local law enforcement and federal agencies like ICE. LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT’S WAR ON FEDERAL AUTHORITY The Minneapolis Police Chief Brian O’Hara’s public instruction to the Somali community—urging them to report “suspicious activity” involving masked individuals making arrests—is not community protection; it is a brazen act of institutional subversion and a direct, hostile challenge to the legitimate enforcement of federal law by agencies like ICE. This is a shocking plot exposed where a local official actively attempts to create a standoff, granting sanctuary and shielding potential lawbreakers from federal jurisdiction. O’Hara’s statement is a calculated maneuver designed to pit local police against federal agents, effectively transforming the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) from a law enforcement body into an anti-federal activist group. His emphasis on intervening for “civil rights violations” creates an immediate, highly dangerous legal pretext for obstructing federal operations, demonstrating the ultimate betrayal of public trust in upholding the national rule of law. IT’S ON: ICE is now going DOOR-TO-DOOR in Minneapolis rounding up Somali illegals tied to the $1 BILLION fraud empire! Deport them ALL! pic.twitter.com/f1eLTntNU7 — Gunther Eagleman (@GuntherEagleman) December 4, 2025 ELITE ARROGANCE AND THE CATASTROPHIC FAILURE OF OPEN BORDERS This situation is the foreseeable catastrophe of open-border policies filtering down to the municipal level. The Chief’s elite arrogance assumes the moral superiority to unilaterally decide which federal laws are enforced within his city limits. This subversion of authority leads directly to a catastrophic failure of the justice system, allowing criminal networks to operate with impunity under the guise of “community protection.” The underlying tension reveals the Deep State agenda at work locally: eroding the boundaries between local and federal government to achieve political goals that defy national security imperatives. The deliberate call for vigilance against legitimate federal operations, conflated with the threat of “masked impersonators,” is a masterclass in regulatory malice, creating chaos and distrust where seamless cooperation should exist. INSTITUTIONAL SUBVERSION: THE DISASTROUS COST OF SANCTUARY The potential for an actual standoff between the MPD and federal agents is the disastrous cost of such radical local policy. This approach sets a dangerous precedent, where municipal leaders decide the limits of American sovereignty based on political expediency. This action undermines the very concept of a unified national defense and internal security structure. This is the newest front of institutional subversion: local government declaring war on federal authority, confirming that their priority is the protection of illegal presence over the protection of the constitutional framework. The entire episode guarantees the continued shredding of international decency by sending a global signal that American laws are negotiable at the municipal level. Sources: The Gateway Pundit: Outrage as Minneapolis Police Chief Urges Somali Community to Dial 911 Victor Reacts: Is the Minneapolis Police Chief Trying to Have a Stand-off with ICE?