Netanyahu and Trump are claiming ironclad unity on Gaza, but the world isn’t buying it—and for good reason, as the “full coordination” narrative is looking thinner than ever with the fate of hostages, Gaza’s future, and American interests all dangling in the balance. Netanyahu and Trump: Projecting Unity While Disagreements Simmer Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and President Donald Trump have been on a Washington charm offensive, trumpeting “full coordination” on the Gaza ceasefire and hostage deal. Their synchronized statements at the White House and Capitol Hill reek of the kind of political theater that’s supposed to reassure allies and silence critics. Yet, behind this display of unity, the real story is anything but harmonious. Reports continue to circulate of sharp disagreements over the pace and terms of a ceasefire, the depth of Israeli troop withdrawals, and—most explosively—who will govern Gaza when the bombs stop falling. The facts are hard to ignore: while both leaders insist they won’t accept a deal “at any price,” the truth is that domestic and international pressures are forcing their hands in ways neither wants to admit. Public statements have become exercises in carefully worded ambiguity. Netanyahu insists Israel’s “goal is to end Hamas rule in Gaza” and that any deal must not compromise Israeli security. Trump, on the other hand, is eager for a diplomatic win to bolster his election-year narrative and expand the Abraham Accords. He has said, “We want to have a ceasefire, we want to have peace, we want to get the hostages back, and I think we are close to doing it.” The reality? Negotiations in Qatar are stuck on the extent of Israeli troop withdrawals, with the U.S. and Arab states pushing for a bigger Palestinian Authority role while Israel digs in its heels. As usual, what’s being said for the cameras is a far cry from what’s happening behind closed doors. Hostage Deal and Ceasefire Talks: The Sticking Points Negotiators have reportedly settled three of four core issues surrounding the latest ceasefire and hostage release proposal, but the last hurdle is a doozy: how far will Israeli troops pull back during a proposed 60-day truce? The deal on the table would see the staged release of 18 Israeli hostages and the remains of 10 others. In exchange, Israel would enact a phased withdrawal from parts of Gaza and pause its military campaign for two months. This is supposed to be the breakthrough that brings relief to hostage families and signals progress on the humanitarian front, but the devil—as always—is in the details. Israel is resisting demands for a total withdrawal, citing security risks, while Washington and its Arab partners insist that only a substantial pullback will make a real difference for civilians and pave the way for a new governing authority. In #Gaza, Trump calls for a ceasefire, but Netanyahu insists on completely destroying #Hamas. Netanyahu views this moment as crucial to striking a final blow to Iran. The region faces a fragile and uncertain future. #MiddleEastPolitics #Diplomacy pic.twitter.com/wbkhWH1CYf — خبرنگار آزاد (@Af_Journalist) July 9, 2025 This standoff is about more than military tactics. It’s a test of whether Netanyahu can hold his fractious coalition together while fending off international criticism, and whether Trump can parlay a “peace deal” into another legacy-defining photo op. Meanwhile, the Palestinian Authority is being propped up as the ideal caretaker for post-war Gaza, even though Israel has spent years undermining its credibility and capacity. The notion that any of these players are actually on the same page is, frankly, laughable. The only thing they all agree on is that none of them wants to be blamed for failure. Regional Fallout and the American Political Calculus The drama isn’t confined to the negotiating table. Regional players like Saudi Arabia and Qatar are piling on the pressure, demanding a role for the Palestinian Authority and threatening to withhold normalization with Israel if their conditions aren’t met. Meanwhile, the Biden administration—which took a beating for its previous border and foreign policy disasters—is desperate to look tough on security and international leadership. Trump, no stranger to leveraging foreign crises for domestic gain, is walking a fine line between supporting Israel and keeping Arab states on board for his Abraham Accords expansion. The endgame here is far from clear, and every day of delay means more instability and suffering on the ground in Gaza. Tensions rise in the #MiddleEast as #DonaldTrump and #BenjaminNetanyahu differ on Iran. Trump seeks limited diplomacy to block nuclear weapons, while Netanyahu demands regime change and ending Iran’s enrichment program. #USIsrael #IranCrisis pic.twitter.com/xBPeVOFq4H — خبرنگار آزاد (@Af_Journalist) July 9, 2025 All this maneuvering leaves American voters—especially those who’ve had it up to here with government overreach, endless foreign entanglements, and bills for wars we never voted for—watching a high-stakes poker game where the house always wins and taxpayers always foot the bill. The only certainty is that the political class, in its quest to “manage” these crises, is once again showing how little regard it has for transparency, accountability, or, heaven forbid, the will of the people. The so-called unity between Netanyahu and Trump may play well on camera, but the facts—and the consequences—speak for themselves. Sources: ABC News Times of Israel CBS News

Washington elites are pushing for America to “maximize” its obligations to Ukraine—never mind that the so-called obligations were never more than squishy diplomatic promises, not a blank check for endless U.S. involvement in a foreign war. Washington’s Ukraine “Obligation” Myth: More Spin Than Substance Americans have been told for years that we owe Ukraine nearly limitless support, thanks to some “obligation” cooked up in the Budapest Memorandum of 1994. Here’s the reality: the U.S. promised to respect Ukraine’s sovereignty and to wag a finger at anyone who threatened it with nukes, but that’s where it stopped. There’s zero legal requirement for U.S. troops, weapons, or billions in aid. In fact, the agreement carefully avoided any NATO-style mutual defense language. The average American, already overtaxed and struggling with inflation, should ask: who benefits from pretending we’re on the hook for Ukraine’s never-ending war tab? It’s not the American people. It’s the same old D.C. crowd, their defense contractor pals, and foreign policy hawks who never met a foreign entanglement they didn’t love—so long as someone else’s son or daughter is sent to fight it. The “maximizing obligations” crowd is banking on the public not reading the fine print. But experts and legal scholars agree: the Budapest Memorandum was never a war guarantee, and anyone claiming otherwise is selling snake oil. Even the architects of America’s foreign policy admit, when pressed, that Ukraine is not covered by any treaty requiring U.S. intervention or unlimited aid. Policy Whiplash: The U.S. Can’t Decide What It Wants Recent months have been a masterclass in government confusion. The Trump administration suspended military aid and intelligence sharing to Ukraine in March—only to restore it days later after internal squabbling and arm-twisting from allies. Then, in July, the Pentagon abruptly halted shipments of crucial weapons, including Patriots and artillery shells, leaving Ukraine exposed just as Russia unleashed its heaviest aerial attack yet. By the following week, there were signals of restarting “some” aid, but nobody in Kyiv—or Congress—actually knew what would happen next. It’s a mess. And yet the same people who demand “maximized” obligations can’t define what that means or how much more they want from U.S. taxpayers. On July 31, Europe could hand over €210 billion to Vladimir Putin. Yes, you read that right. Frozen Russian assets, meant to hold the Kremlin accountable for invading Ukraine, could go back in Moscow — and the clock is ticking. @Jziskina explains what needs to be done. pic.twitter.com/Xpwk5IwIQi — Razom for Ukraine (@razomforukraine) June 18, 2025 This flip-flopping has European leaders in a panic. They’re suddenly realizing that maybe, just maybe, they’ll have to step up and spend their own euros instead of relying on Uncle Sam’s endless credit card. America’s credibility, they say, is at stake. But maybe what’s really at stake is the D.C. gravy train, which now finds itself on a bumpy track as voters demand accountability—and a return to constitutional principles, not foreign quagmires. Realists vs. The Intervention-Industrial Complex On one side, the so-called “interventionists” insist that propping up Ukraine is essential to defending the “international order.” On the other, the realists—and anyone with a shred of common sense—point out that the U.S. Constitution gives Congress, not the president or unelected bureaucrats, the power to declare war and appropriate funds. The Budapest Memorandum is not a treaty, and it sure doesn’t override American law or the will of the people. As the debate rages, the Biden-era fantasy of blank checks is colliding with economic reality and the hard limits of U.S. interests. We need more than long-range missiles, sophisticated weapons and air defense. Justice means money – €300bn in frozen russian assets must go to Ukraine. pic.twitter.com/Z6SKzicLDK — Kira Rudik (@kiraincongress) June 16, 2025 Meanwhile, the real-world consequences of this elite confusion are dire. Ukraine’s battlefield position is weakening without steady aid, European allies are eyeing new defense taxes, and Russia is emboldened by the spectacle of Western disunity. But here’s the kicker: none of this was inevitable. The U.S. could have stuck to its founding principles—avoid foreign entanglements, defend our own borders, and put America first. Instead, we’re treated to lectures about “maximizing” obligations that never legally existed, all while American families pay the price at the pump, the grocery store, and on tax day. Sources: Can Ukraine Fight Without U.S. Aid? Seven Questions to Ask Trump, Ukraine Support, and Europe’s Allies In Hindsight: The U.S. Pivot on Ukraine and Shifting Security Council Dynamics Trump, Ukraine, Russia, and the Aid War

Border chaos turned into record-setting security in just 100 days—yet the mainstream media can barely bring themselves to admit it, let alone explain how President Trump’s “Peace Through Strength” doctrine delivered the most secure border in American history while restoring the kind of global stability and American leverage that used to be considered common sense. How Trump’s “Peace Through Strength” Doctrine Slammed the Border Shut For years, Americans watched in disbelief as our borders were flung open to millions—yes, millions—of illegal immigrants and criminals, with border chaos so relentless it felt like a deliberate attack on sovereignty. Under Biden, average monthly border encounters soared to nearly 160,000, and the total number for his four years? A staggering 11 million. Fentanyl poured in, killing tens of thousands. And criminals, gang members, and potential terrorists slipped through as the government released hundreds of thousands into the interior. But in the first 100 days of Trump’s return to the Oval Office, that insanity ended. Daily border encounters have dropped by an eye-popping 93%, gotaway encounters plummeted by 95%, and total crossings are down a jaw-dropping 99.99%. March 2025 saw the lowest number of encounters ever recorded—less than 7,200 for the month. That is what happens when you enforce the law and put American safety first. Suddenly, the invasion is “over,” and the border is finally under U.S. control again. So, remind me—why did it take so long, and why was it allowed to get so bad in the first place? While the left howls about “compassion” and “humanitarian relief,” the math doesn’t lie. Under the previous administration, 56,154 criminals with convictions or warrants were arrested at the border since 2021—a grim record, compared to 21,936 from 2017 to 2020. And ICE admits that 650,000 criminal aliens are currently counted on its Non-Detained Docket, many just wandering free. These are the real numbers, and they’re terrifying. The open border policies incentivized the worst of the worst to stream in, all while American communities paid the price. Now, with enforcement back in place, those numbers are finally turning around, but the legacy of “catch and release,” asylum fraud, and government-enabled chaos won’t be erased overnight. America First Abroad: Conditional Aid, Real Negotiations, and Reluctant Peace Trump’s foreign policy isn’t about playing nice in the global sandbox or writing blank checks to European bureaucrats or distant warlords. It’s about leverage—real, unapologetic, American leverage. In Israel and Gaza, U.S. support is now firmly tied to progress toward regional stability and a ceasefire, not the endless, one-sided backing that fueled decades of stalemate. Trump’s administration has made it clear: if you want U.S. help, you deliver results. The same goes for Ukraine and Russia. Instead of endless military aid with no strings attached, Ukraine now faces tough choices and real pressure to negotiate. Russia gets the message—sanctions will escalate, but so will the push for a settled peace. No more endless wars, no more U.S. taxpayers footing the bill while Europe sits on its hands. This 4th of July, you didn't need poll numbers to see that American pride is back. With strong leadership, we’re seeing peace through strength, a secure border, and a booming economy. The best days of our great nation are not behind us—they’re ahead. pic.twitter.com/HOBsGmnAiJ — Congressman Zach Nunn (@ZachNunn) July 7, 2025 And for those still clinging to the fantasy that Iran could be trusted with “constructive engagement,” the administration’s lightning strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities were a wake-up call. Iran got the message—get to the table, or face consequences. President Pezeshkian signaled openness to dialogue, and a ceasefire with Israel was reached. That’s not “cowboy diplomacy,” that’s common sense—something sorely lacking in the years when America apologized for its own strength and let adversaries set the terms. The Aftermath: Can Real Security Last, or Will Old Habits Die Hard? While Trump’s approach has delivered short-term de-escalation in global hotspots and a historic reversal at the border, the long-term outlook is less certain. Allies are uneasy, having grown accustomed to U.S. largesse and unconditional support. Critics warn that a transactional, America-first approach could erode traditional alliances and embolden rivals. But ask any American who’s watched their community suffer under waves of illegal immigration, fentanyl, and unchecked crime—maybe it’s time the U.S. government stopped acting like a global ATM and started defending its own citizens again. The open question is whether this new era of “peace through strength” will hold, or whether the next administration will cave to the same old failed policies of appeasement, open borders, and government overreach. For now, the numbers don’t lie—security is up, chaos is down, and Americans can finally breathe a little easier. If only common sense could be made permanent policy. pic.twitter.com/gPU7RBvMPV — Wall Street Mav (@WallStreetMav) July 7, 2025 But let’s be blunt: If you’re waiting for the mainstream media to admit these facts, don’t hold your breath. They’re too busy lamenting the loss of “norms” and pining for the days when global elites ran America’s foreign policy without any pesky input from the people actually living with the consequences. Sources: STARTLING STATS FACTSHEET: FY2025 Begins with Over 140,000 Border Encounters Nationwide, Worsening Public Safety Crisis Under Biden-Harris Administration Border crossings plunge to lowest levels in decades: New data – Axios 100 Days of The Most Secure Border in American History Foreign-Born Number and Share of U.S. Population at All-Time …

Federal agents and military troops storm a Los Angeles park in a massive show of force, yet not a single arrest is made—while a California congressman claims anyone “Brown” is being targeted, sparking outrage and disbelief across the city. Federal Agents, Military, and a Park Full of Fear The spectacle at MacArthur Park on July 7, 2025, looked less like a law enforcement operation and more like a military exercise in intimidation. More than a hundred federal agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) rolled in with horses and armored vehicles, backed up by nearly a company of armed U.S. troops. The scene, which unfolded during a children’s summer camp, left residents and local leaders shocked and demanding answers. Not a single arrest was confirmed by the agencies or witnessed by the on-site media, prompting immediate questions about the true intent behind this high-profile incursion. Mayor Karen Bass, a frequent critic of heavy-handed federal tactics, arrived at the park demanding agents leave, later denouncing the operation as “absolutely outrageous.” She wasn’t alone. Residents, many of them Hispanic and long accustomed to the unease of living under the threat of federal raids, described the event as a deliberate act of intimidation. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) refused to provide details, citing ongoing enforcement activities, while the Border Patrol’s leadership hinted that such raids could soon become “the new normal” in Los Angeles. Rep. Gomez Cries Racism, ICE Stays Silent Rep. Jimmy Gomez, Democrat from Los Angeles, wasted no time in seizing the moment. In a CNN interview, he blasted ICE for targeting “anybody that is Brown,” claiming agents were rounding up people who looked like him, not just criminals. This accusation, incendiary by any political standard, quickly became the rallying cry for activists and local officials who have long opposed federal enforcement in their city. Gomez’s comments, however, didn’t come with evidence or specifics—because there were no confirmed arrests, let alone proof of racial profiling. #MacArthurPark #ICE sweeps thru the park, taking several people. Entire park was cleared.@MayorOfLA was there and talking to supervisor, told them to leave now. More coming @FOXLA pic.twitter.com/Xwf8tzEl3j — Kevin Takumi (@KevinTakumi) July 7, 2025 Yet, what better way to inflame public sentiment than to claim federal officers are hunting people based on skin color, especially when the operation’s secrecy leaves so many questions unanswered? ICE and DHS, for their part, have been tight-lipped, refusing to explain what, if anything, was accomplished. This silence has only served to validate the worst fears of the community and embolden critics who see each raid as a political stunt designed to frighten and divide. Political Theater vs. Public Safety: Who Benefits? While the Biden years saw border encounters and illegal crossings skyrocket, the current administration is trying to prove it means business on immigration enforcement. But when agents and soldiers descend on a park and leave with nothing to show for it, the message becomes muddled. Are these operations meant to actually catch dangerous criminals, or are they elaborate photo-ops staged to send a message—either to the immigrant community or the political opposition? What is it going to take to wake you up MAGAts? Ice is running over people in LA. pic.twitter.com/qZ9Ck2fUkl — MAGA Cult Slayer (@MAGACult2) June 7, 2025 Local leaders have made their stance clear. They see these tactics as a direct attack on community trust and public safety. Mayor Bass and Rep. Gomez argue that such operations drive a wedge between law enforcement and residents, making neighborhoods less safe as immigrants become too frightened to cooperate with police. The lack of transparency and the absence of any arrests or criminal apprehensions only fuel the suspicion that these raids are more about optics than outcomes. The Aftermath: Fear, Distrust, and More Unanswered Questions In the days following the raid, tension remains high across MacArthur Park and the wider Los Angeles immigrant community. Parents are keeping children home, workers are avoiding public spaces, and business owners are worried about the impact on their livelihoods. The only thing that’s clear is that no one really knows what federal agents were looking for, or if they ever intended to find it. DHS has maintained its silence, while federal officials have signaled that more such operations may be on the horizon. For many Angelenos, especially those in immigrant-heavy neighborhoods, the MacArthur Park raid was just the latest chapter in a long saga of federal-local conflict. The lack of arrests and the refusal to provide answers have left the community feeling targeted and local officials questioning not just the motives, but the competence, of those calling the shots in Washington. And as politicians on both sides scramble to control the narrative, one thing is certain: the people who live and work in these communities are left to pick up the pieces, once again caught in the crossfire of America’s endless immigration debate. Sources: CBS News Los Angeles LA Times ABC7 ABC News

Jill Biden’s unprecedented power play inside the White House not only rewrote the rules for First Ladies but left Americans wondering: who was really running the country as President Biden’s political fortunes collapsed? Jill Biden’s Unfiltered Power Grab: How the First Lady Moved the White House Forget the myth of the supportive, apolitical First Lady. According to the bombshell new book “2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America,” Jill Biden was the real power behind the scenes as President Biden’s mental fitness faltered. The narrative Americans were sold about a steady hand at the helm turned out to be a family affair, with Jill Biden—armed with a tight-knit team and unwavering confidence—acting as gatekeeper, strategist, and, let’s face it, shadow president. As Joe Biden’s age and cognitive health became the 2024 election’s worst-kept secret—culminating in that disastrous debate performance—insiders say Jill Biden and her chief aide Anthony Bernal ran interference, silencing dissent and insulating the president from calls to step aside. Their iron grip on messaging left even senior White House officials out in the cold. If you thought the American people were getting transparency, think again. According to the book, Jill’s camp labeled loyalists who dared question the president’s capacity as traitors and “disgusting.” While donors and party bigwigs begged for a change, Jill doubled down, telling supporters, “Joe isn’t just the right person for the job. He’s the only person for the job.” That stubbornness, as the book’s authors and a growing pile of congressional subpoenas detail, may have cost Democrats the White House and left voters fuming over yet another episode of political theater masquerading as leadership. The Collapse: Congressional Investigations and a Party in Chaos The Democratic establishment’s panic after Biden’s debate fiasco was matched only by the First Lady’s resolve to keep her husband in the race. As White House aides scrambled to contain the fallout, family members huddled at Camp David, ultimately overriding party leaders and strategists clamoring for a new nominee. The result? A White House in disarray, with senior officials leaking tales of dysfunction, and a nation left to watch the spectacle unfold. Anthony Bernal, Jill’s right-hand man, became a central figure—refusing at first to testify before Congress about what he knew regarding the president’s mental decline, before finally succumbing to a subpoena. That kind of stonewalling only deepened suspicions that the American people weren’t being told the full story. My prediction was right. She was the one! New book exposes Jill Biden's power grab amid husband's political demise https://t.co/6geI239u9x — Thuy Nguyen (@thuy1975) July 8, 2025 All the while, Hunter Biden’s federal trial ran parallel to the campaign, keeping the Biden family’s troubles on full public display. The convergence of personal and political crises didn’t just weaken the Democratic ticket—it exposed the fragility of a party more concerned with saving face than telling voters the truth. Less than a month after the infamous debate, and following an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, President Biden finally dropped out, endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris. The damage, though, was done. Republicans seized on the chaos, and the rest is history. The Fallout: What Jill Biden’s Reign Means for America This episode wasn’t just a campaign blunder—it was a masterclass in how unchecked power and family loyalty can override common sense and constitutional accountability. Jill Biden’s aggressive defense of her husband and her willingness to override senior staff has sparked a furious debate over the proper role of the First Lady. For Americans who expect honesty, competence, and a government that works for the people—not for the ambitions of a political dynasty—this saga was a slap in the face. “He quickly bonded with Jill Biden and never left her side, becoming unflinchingly loyal to her and using his proximity to her to exert power wherever he decided. It was often unclear if the opinion he was expressing was his own or the first lady’s. Sometimes, when donors or… — Truth is beauty! (@JanCookLive) July 8, 2025 The Democratic Party now faces the consequences of its dysfunction. Donors and voters, already skeptical, watched in real-time as the levers of power were pulled not by elected officials, but by unelected family advisors and aides. The result is a party fractured, a public trust shattered, and a historic opportunity handed to Republicans on a silver platter. The only winners here? The authors who got their tell-all, and the voters who demanded change at the ballot box. As for the rest of us—left to foot the bill for this circus—we’re still waiting for accountability and a return to the values that made this country great. Sources: 2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America Axios: Jill Biden’s Growing Political Influence Fox News: Jill Biden Accused of White House Power Grab