Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices

Conservative Voices

@conservativevoices

BREAKING: Senator Bill Cassidy just LOST; Trump releases statement
Favicon 
therightscoop.com

BREAKING: Senator Bill Cassidy just LOST; Trump releases statement

Senator Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, who voted to impeach President Trump, just lost his primary race. Trump-backed Julia Letlow and state Treasurer John Fleming will now compete in a runoff. Here’s the . . .

Trump has made ‘no commitment’ to Xi Jinping on Taiwan
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

Trump has made ‘no commitment’ to Xi Jinping on Taiwan

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html

‘Little did he know’: US kills the second-in-command of ISIS
Favicon 
www.brighteon.com

‘Little did he know’: US kills the second-in-command of ISIS

Follow NewsClips channel at Brighteon.com for more updatesSubscribe to Brighteon newsletter to get the latest news and more featured videos: https://support.brighteon.com/Subscribe.html

In Search of Undead Malls
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

In Search of Undead Malls

Culture In Search of Undead Malls The sacred endures, but all things profane pass away. Last month, when I was in the Washington, DC, area for a week, there were two places I knew I wanted to make the time to see: the Washington National Cathedral and the Tysons Galleria shopping center in Fairfax County, Virginia. The combination of these two particular sights would not be at the top of every tourist’s list, but what can I say? The sacred and the profane have always intersected in interesting, unexpected ways in my life. The National Cathedral was, of course, as overpoweringly majestic as it had always appeared to me when I saw it during the televised state funerals of Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, although I was unprepared for the way its smaller nooks and crannies—the numerous chapels around and under the main nave and altar—invited reverent contemplation. It will be a long time before I see a sight as striking as the bright morning sun piercing the stained glass and casting colorful shards on a statue of George Washington. Yet, in its own unrepentantly materialistic fashion, my visit to Tysons Galleria was just as memorable—for better and for worse. “Dead malls”—that is, shopping malls that have entered an irreversible state of deterioration and shopper indifference or disuse—have become an object of popular fascination, but no mall for me is ever truly dead. No matter their condition, malls remain the site of so many memories, especially the malls from my youth in New Orleans. How could I forget my father buying me my first sport coat? Or my mother buying herself a cross necklace? Or my father taking my brother and me along to buy my mother, apropos of nothing, a gift so special she almost never used it (a purse with a bamboo handle)? Alas, although I have not been to New Orleans in many years, it takes only rudimentary Googling to find that the mall where these memories happened is not what it once was. Some of the stores are gone; others have been reduced in size and scale. This specific mall may not be among the dead, but it is certainly not in the prime of life.  So, after I completed my tour of the National Cathedral, I went to northern Virginia in search of an America insulated from our present economic woes and reliance on the internet for everything. Having briefly lived in suburban Maryland a few decades ago, I remember Tysons Corner as being a vibrant shopping destination. I remember, too, that the adjacent Tysons Galleria was even tonier. Might I find that shopping malls were not mere Proustian madeleines from my youth? When I entered the Galleria, the signs were encouraging—at least for a Tuesday afternoon in the spring. Shoppers strolled amiably from one high-end retailer to another: Cartier, Gucci, Lilly Pulitzer, and so on. Seeking nothing in particular, I sauntered inside the Ralph Lauren store, where I was greeted by a courteous clerk who offered bottled water with no expectation of a purchase being made—although a purchase was made, next door, at Ralph’s Coffee: nothing provides mid-afternoon sustenance like quality baked goods bearing the branding of America’s preppiest retailer. So far, so good—very good.  As I did my window shopping, I kept looking for cracks in the high-polished façade, some sign of the mall’s imminent decline. Even Neiman Marcus, spread out perhaps too generously over three floors, seemed to be in fine form—to my astonishment, given my low expectations for pleasant retail experiences, the fabled department store contained within its hallowed walls a café that served a delicious, seemingly freshly prepared hamburger.  Finally, though, the spell was broken: As I wandered into Saks Fifth Avenue, I noticed something amiss—or should I say “nothing” amiss? The space had been cleaned out of most obvious merchandise to reveal little but racks and tables and mannequins. As it turned out, I had gone to the Galleria at the same time that Saks, one of its anchor tenants, was shutting down and selling what furnishings remained—part of a batch of store closures that have coincided with its bankruptcy proceedings. (Neiman Marcus is part of the same company, though, for now, it hangs on in northern Virginia.) This experience was sobering. My shopping mall dreams of days gone by must remain just that—dreams of a past, and we all know what novelist L.P. Hartley said about that place: “The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.” But I now feel that to have seen the National Cathedral and gone to Tysons Galleria on a single trip provided a useful education to me: The cathedral endures for its eternal truths, while even the fanciest malls, like the fanciest anything, are subject to decline and decay. What are dead malls but a metaphor for the fate that awaits all earthly things?  The post In Search of Undead Malls appeared first on The American Conservative.

Generation AI Has Its Doubts
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Generation AI Has Its Doubts

Culture Generation AI Has Its Doubts Young Americans raised alongside artificial intelligence are growing uneasy about the future it promises. Gloria Caulfield had expected a different reaction.  Speaking at the University of Central Florida’s commencement ceremonies last weekend, Caulfield, the vice president of Strategic Alliances for Tavistock Development, had approached the microphone in long black and gold robes to speak positively about the sweeping improvements that artificial intelligence will bring to the next generation of workers and entrepreneurs. But what Caulfield had not considered was the simmering frustration among the several thousand students. Caulfield spoke triumphantly. “The rise of artificial intelligence is the next Industrial Revolution!” And that’s when the jeers, instead of cheers, began. Caulfield awkwardly laughed and turned to her fellow speakers. “What happened?” Caulfield asked as she sought support. One student’s voice rose among the crowd. “AI sucks!” Turning back to the students, Caulfield admitted she had “struck a chord,” though it was clear that she struggled to comprehend which note had disturbed the College of Humanities students she was addressing. “May I finish?” Caulfield attempted to power through her written statement. “Only a few years ago, AI was not a factor in our lives.” A giant cheer rang through the auditorium.  Once again, Caulfield turned toward the speakers and threw her hands up in disbelief. The camera cut to a shot of more than a hundred students, their faces beaming with joy. Some stood and defiantly shook their fists in support of Caulfield’s admission that artificial intelligence played but a small and remote role in the lives of Americans “only a few years ago.” “OK, we’ve got a bipolar topic here,” replied Caulfield.  But her assessment of the issue, and the prepared remarks she read, had clearly missed the mark. This was not a “bipolar topic” at all—quite the opposite. Here, among the graduating humanities students at UCF, was evidence of a broader generational tension: young people may be the most AI-dependent generation in history, but they are increasingly uneasy about what the technology promises. The students expected to inherit these tools are also the ones most exposed to their consequences. For Caulfield, a Florida business executive who favors the use of new technologies to drive innovation and capital, AI is a golden goose late in her career. Its emergence has created an entire new sector filled with the alluring promise that change is coming. For executives and investors nearing the apex of their careers, AI represents productivity, efficiency, and untapped markets. For students entering the workforce, it increasingly represents competition. That dilemma was the question on the minds of many students listening to Caulfield’s unrestrained AI optimism in central Florida this weekend.  “And now, AI capabilities are in the palm of our hands,” Caulfield exclaimed as even more jeers rained down from the student body.  “Oh, I love it,” Caulfield retorted in jest, as if the matter at hand was a simple disagreement of taste. What Caulfield failed to recognize is that the controversies over the rise of AI—and over the future of those who will live with its consequences—is not something that can easily be addressed through the democratic process. The students booing Caulfield are not anti-technology Luddites. In fact, Gen Z is the most AI-saturated generation in American history. In a March poll conducted online by Gallup which surveyed 1,572 people between the ages of 14 to 29, more than half of respondents say they use AI technology either daily or weekly. Another 11 percent say they use the technology at least once a month. Yet the same surveys show rising skepticism, falling optimism, and deep concern about AI’s impact on creative work and employment.  Compared with similar polling by Gallup a year ago, respondents report being angrier and less hopeful about the emergence of artificial intelligence. Rising concern is no doubt exacerbated by the uncertainty many recent graduates feel as they enter workplaces where AI is quickly eroding entry-level opportunities. Coding, copywriting, design, legal research, translation, and white-collar internships are increasingly vulnerable as AI spreads. And despite dismissals from some that such claims are overwrought, it would appear the youngest generation most clearly anticipates where this is all headed. Older Americans, particularly in creative industries, are also confronting the realities of artificial intelligence. Speaking at the Cannes Film Festival this week, the actress Demi Moore confidently stated that AI is here to stay.  “To fight it is to fight something that is a battle that we will lose,” Moore admitted. “So to find ways in which we can work with it, I think is a more valuable path to take.”  Her comments come only months before the premier of As Deep as the Grave, a new film that will use Val Kilmer’s AI-generated likeness and voice a little more than a year after the actor died of pneumonia. And as AI-generated musicians and actors take on roles once exclusively performed by humans, Taylor Swift and Matthew McConnaughey have applied trademarks to their voices and images to protect from artificial intelligence impersonations.  All of this signals a confusing future that many young Americans are no longer certain they even want. The students booing at UCF were not simply rejecting technology itself; they were rejecting an assumption that every technological advance automatically represents social progress. Raised alongside algorithms, automation, and artificial intelligence, Gen Z may become the first generation expected to champion a technological revolution they fundamentally distrust. The post Generation AI Has Its Doubts appeared first on The American Conservative.