The Department of Justice has confirmed to The Daily Wire that it has launched a grand jury investigation into leftist megadonor Neville Roy Singham, who has been accused of promoting Chinese Communist Party interests. A federal grand jury in Manhattan issued subpoenas on behalf of an investigation led by U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton and authorized by Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, Fox News reported on Monday. The subpoenas reportedly seek financial records tied to Singham and his network. Singham recently funneled $285 million from his accounts in China to Left-wing organizations in the United States through the Goldman Sachs’ philanthropic entity, the GS Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management. Prosecutors are reportedly examining whether Singham engaged in wire fraud, money laundering, or any other financial crimes, or acted as an unregistered foreign agent on behalf of China. The investigation is part of the Trump administration’s efforts to crack down on fraud in nonprofits, political organizations, and government-backed entities. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also met with Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon to discuss Singham and the recent investigation, according to the outlet. Bessent allegedly warned the bank that they could also be investigated for their past connections with the CCP and their account with Singham. Singham is connected to organizations such as the People’s Forum, Party for Socialism and Liberation, and Code Pink. His wife, Jodie Evans, is a leftist activist who co-founded the radical anti-war organization Code Pink. Lawmakers have also alleged that Singham was affiliated with the Maku Group, a CCP-backed propaganda organization. Singham has been a Communist ever since his youth, when he took membership in the League of Revolutionary Black Workers, a Mao-influenced group based in Detroit, Michigan, the New Lines Magazine reported. Singham used America’s capitalist system to gain his wealth. After college at Howard University, Singham founded Thoughtworks, a consulting and software firm, which he sold to a private equity firm in 2017 for $785 million. In a viral clip posted by Fox News Digital, Singham argued to Chinese officials that America and Britain were not the heroes in World War II. “This fascist lie that the West says that there is a battle between fascism, democracy and communism. They make a fake argument that there are three systems,” Singham stated. “In fact, fascism is actually a face of capitalism and imperialism, as is colonialism. These are three faces of a system that quite now is getting very, very dangerous for us.” Singham also argued that the Soviet Union and China were the real heroes of WWII. OpenSecrets has tracked $70,000 of direct funding from Singham, including $18,000 to Democratic Representative Pramila Jayapal of Washington, $8,400 to then-Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii, and $7,500 to the Green Party, along with funding to the campaigns of former President Barack Obama and Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT). 

The brother of a man killed in the 9/11 World Trade Center attacks has a blunt message for New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani: Don’t bother showing up at the Ground Zero memorial. Dennis McGinley, whose brother Daniel Francis McGinley died on the 89th floor when terrorists struck the World Trade Center in 2001, tore into Mamdani during a fiery sit-down with NewsNation anchor Katie Pavlich, accusing the socialist mayor and his political peers of hijacking the tragedy’s legacy for their own narratives. Daniel, then 40, was a senior vice president at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods when he was murdered alongside nearly 3,000 others that morning. His brother has since become one of the most outspoken advocates for victims’ families, frequently sparring with leftist politicians he believes have lost sight of who actually suffered that day. Asked by Pavlich how to confront a younger generation that seems increasingly willing to rationalize the atrocity, McGinley didn’t pull punches. He suggested the critics in question lack real-world experience, saying, “These people, they don’t seem very bright to me. From what I’ve read, I don’t think they’ve ever had a job. They just go to like an Ivy League school for like 10 years.” He wondered aloud whether their tune would change if someone they loved had faced the horrifying choice so many victims confronted that day. “I do think that if one of their relatives or loved ones had shown up to work, and within an hour after arriving at work, they had to decide, do I jump from the 100th floor of this building or do I burn alive?” he added. McGinley said he wouldn’t wish the past quarter-century of grief on anyone — but argued that anyone seeking public office, especially in New York, owes the city’s residents more compassion than he believes has been shown. Then he tore into politicians, noting that they traditionally pose for photos behind the rope line at the annual Ground Zero ceremony before vanishing. “Being that it’s a political season and campaign season, and that’s usually when the politicians show up down at Ground Zero for the memorial every year — you know, they’re behind their ropes and they’re laughing, smiling, taking their photo ops, and then they take off,” McGinley said. “We certainly hope that none of these politicians show up down there for their photo op. We do not want them there, and that goes for Mayor Mamdani as well.” "We certainly hope that none of these politicians show up down there for their photo op – we do not want them there – and that goes for Mayor Mamdani as well." WATCH: Dennis McGinley – whose brother Daniel was murdered in the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 – joins Katie… pic.twitter.com/DS46Q65hvG — Katie Pavlich Tonight (@KatiePavlichNN) June 27, 2026 This follows months of controversy surrounding how Mamdani discusses the terror attack. Speaking last September, he focused on Islamophobia, saying, “It became a fact of life. It was this horrific day that was also for many New Yorkers the moment at which they were marked an ‘other.’” A month later, he invoked an aunt he said stopped riding the subway after the attacks out of fear for wearing a hijab. Conservative commentators bitterly criticized Mamdani. CNN contributor Scott Jennings blasted the remarks online, writing, “There was one big thing missing from Zohran Mamdani’s emotional remarks about 9/11: Any mention of the VICTIMS of the worst terror attack on U.S. soil. What are we to infer from this?” There was one big thing missing from Zohran Mamdani's emotional remarks about 9/11: Any mention of the VICTIMS of the worst terror attack on U.S. soil. What are we to infer from this? pic.twitter.com/qNXxR03a0m — Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) October 25, 2025 On air, Jennings doubled down, declaring: I think if you’re going to run for mayor of New York City, have any position in New York City and you’re going to talk about 9/11 or invoke 9/11, you darn sure better start with the people who died in the Twin Towers. That’s what I think. And he didn’t do that and he made it about his experience and his aunt and all this. … That moment in our history, you cannot lose sight of what happened. People died in those Twin Towers. They did not deserve to die. We did suffer a terrorist attack and we can’t really forget the moment, making it about him and his family. There were almost 3,000 people that died there. It’s a big deal. For McGinley and other grieving relatives, the message is simple: 9/11 remembrance belongs to the dead and those who loved them, not to politicians chasing a sympathetic storyline.

The Texas Supreme Court last week revived a young woman’s case against medical professionals who put her on the path to have her body irreversibly damaged in the name of transgender healthcare, paving the way for similar lawsuits. The unanimous ruling allows Soren Aldaco to continue her medical malpractice suit against her former therapist and Three Oaks Counseling. Her suit states that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties and that their medical interventions led to Aldaco’s “permanent disfigurement and profound psychological scarring.” Aldaco is seeking upwards of $1 million in damages. Aldaco’s win is notable because the court agreed that the statute of limitations was more complex than the transgender medical industry argues. While the statute of limitations would have prevented Aldaco from suing after she was injured, the court agreed that lawsuits can continue in cases where a minor is put on a path to medical transition. Aldaco, an activist who suffered greatly from a medical gender procedure, is no longer “timed out” of suing those who harmed her. The ruling could set a precedent for other detransitioners and puts the transgender medical industry on notice. Independent Women’s Forum said the ruling “establishes a renewed lens for determining when the statute of limitations begins in cases involving minors who later allege harm from medical providers who facilitated irreversible ‘gender-transition’ interventions.” “Today the Texas Supreme Court unanimously ruled that my case deserves to be heard, and that providers implicated in harming vulnerable patients can’t twist the statute of limitations to escape accountability,” Aldaco said in a statement issued Monday. “This ruling is a watershed moment.” “The Court’s opinion is already sending shockwaves far beyond Texas,” she added. “The direct impact will be felt here at home — but providers across the country, and federally, will now think twice about their responsibility to patients. And patients will see, through the model established here in Texas, that they deserve to be protected and taken seriously.” Aldaco began identifying as transgender around 11 and was started on hormone replacement therapy at age 17, as outlined by Kelsey Bolar, a senior policy analyst at Independent Women’s Forum. At 19, Aldaco underwent surgery to remove her healthy breasts and, just two weeks later, ended up alone in an emergency room for eight hours as doctors reopened her wounds from the double mastectomy. “At the time, I thought I was going to die,” Aldaco told Independent Women’s Forum. “I just remember being on zero pain meds at the time.” “Her traumatic medical complications opened her eyes to the ills of so-called ‘gender-affirming care,’ which she said enabled her to believe hormones and surgery could provide her with the sense of self she craved growing up,” Bolar said of Aldaco. “Detransitioned and now working to heal from her ordeal through mindfulness, Soren has become a vocal critic of the ‘enabling’ she sees happening within the gender medical industry.” The ruling comes on the heels of another high-profile victory for a detransitioner. Fox Varian received $2 million following a verdict in New York in January. Her case centered around the removal of her healthy breasts at age 16 for reasons of supposed transgender care. Related: ‘No One Has A Right To Sterilize A Child’: Two Detransitioners Sue Doctors Over Medical Interventions

A Mexican national pleaded guilty to smuggling thousands of illegal immigrants into the United States, including from heavily Islamic countries with links to terrorism.  Efrain Zuniga-Garcia admitted Monday in federal court to participating in a “vast” scheme to sneak up to 3,000 foreign nationals into America, including from countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Egypt, and Yemen, the Justice Department said. The 38-year-old Zuniga-Garcia was involved in the scheme from November 2020 until September 2023, when he was first charged.   The smuggling network operated stash houses in Monterrey, Mexico, and Piedras Negras, Mexico, and brought in between 2,500 and 3,000 illegal immigrants. The network also smuggled in foreign nationals from India, Colombia, Guatemala, Honduras, and Ecuador. The scheme operated at the same time that Border Patrol agents encountered a shocking spike in individuals on the terror watchlist along the porous border that former President Joe Biden oversaw. Zuniga-Garcia ran the Monterrey stash house where he coordinated the transportation of the illegals by turning them over to “coyotes” who would bring them across the Rio Grande and into the United States, according to the Justice Department.  He was charged in September 2023 with conspiracy to bring an alien into the United States and three counts of bringing an alien into the United States for financial benefit. Zuniga-Garcia pled guilty to both counts and faces a mandatory minimum of three years in prison upon sentencing.  Multiple of Zuniga-Garcia’s co-defendants have already been sentenced to prison, including Enil Edil Mejia-Zuniga and Monica Hernandez-Palma. Mejia-Zuniga, an illegal from Honduras who lived in San Antonio, Texas, was sentenced to 10 years in prison in July 2025 after being convicted of directing the operation.  “In an effort to satisfy his greed, Mejia-Zuniga facilitated the illegal movement of thousands of Middle Easterners into the United States,” said U.S. Attorney Justin Simmons for the Western District of Texas at the time. “His actions put our national security at risk.” Lawmakers have warned that Americans could still be facing security challenges after the flood of illegal immigrants during the Biden presidency. The House Homeland Security Committee found that from the start of fiscal year 2021 to the end of Biden’s presidency, Border Patrol agents encountered around 400 individuals on the terror watchlist at the border. From 2017 to 2020, only 14 individuals on the terror watchlist were apprehended at the border, according to the committee. During that same time, at least two million illegals who were known “gotaways” entered the country.

Outraged over the Supreme Court’s decision to allow states to count mail-in ballots received after Election Day, Republicans are doubling down on their push to pass the SAVE America Act to “uphold election integrity.”  Missouri Republican Senator Eric Schmitt called the court’s decision on Monday “shockingly wrong.” “A shockingly wrong opinion. Justice Barrett joins with the liberal justices to hold that federal election law does not preempt states who allow late mail-in ballots to be counted.” He added, “This is terrible for election integrity. Another reason we must pass the full SAVE American Act.” The SAVE America Act would require proof of citizenship to vote and would add restrictions to mail-in ballots, including new ID requirements. In its decision on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled the states have authority over their own elections, and federal law does not preempt that authority.  Congressman Greg Steube (R-FL) echoed Schmitt’s urgency for the Save America Act to be passed. Steube called on the Senate to “nuke” the filibuster to allow the bill to be passed. “The House already passed the SAVE Act to fix this. The Senate filibuster is the only thing standing in the way. Nuke it,” he said.  Florida Governor Ron DeSantis said that while the decision is “a loss for election integrity,” his state “will continue to only count mail ballots that arrive by Election Day.” RNC Chairman Joe Gruters added, “If we want fair and secure elections, Election Day should mean exactly what it says, which is why this decision makes it even more imperative that Congress pass the Save America Act.” Gruters argued that by allowing mail-in ballots post-election day, “Democrats are inviting chaos at the ballot box by allowing elections to drag on for days and weeks after voters cast their ballots.” The 5-4 ruling says states can count ballots as long as they are postmarked by Election Day. Recently, the mail-in counting process led to Los Angeles mayoral candidate Spencer Pratt losing his primary one week after the election after mail in ballots from his challenger Nithya Raman were counted.  In his dissent, conservative Justice Samuel Alito wrote, “It opens up and fails to resolve a host of questions for state election officials and courts. And it creates a serious risk of further undermining public confidence in our elections and our system of self-government.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) praised the court’s decision and hinted that Senate Democrats would work to stop the SAVE America Act. “The Supreme Court just upheld this bedrock American principle: if you cast your ballot on time, your vote will count. Participation in democracy should never be limited—not by your race, where you live, or how you vote,” he said. “Senate Democrats will continue to do everything we can to protect free and fair elections, where everyone’s voice is heard.” Schumer and other Democrats have specifically raised concerns that the SAVE America Act could restrict married women from voting if they changed their last names but have not received a new passport or driver’s license to match.  Ken Martin, chairman of the DNC, said Republicans’ decision to challenge Mississippi’s mail-in voting was an attempt to “rig the system.”  “Trump and Republicans are attacking our elections and trying to rig the system in their favor because they know the American people are ready to reject their chaos and corruption this November.” He added, “The DNC is proud to have stood with the state of Mississippi to defeat the RNC’s latest attack on Americans’ voting rights.”