Living In Faith
Living In Faith

Living In Faith

@livinginfaith

3 Questions to Evaluate AI Use
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

3 Questions to Evaluate AI Use

A fellow homeschool mom tells me she uses ChatGPT to create a schedule for her kids’ schoolwork. A working mom I know uses AI to create meal plans and shopping lists. A writer friend uses it to juggle multiple deadlines. Generative AI—especially large language models (LLMs) such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Google’s Gemini, and Microsoft’s Copilot—has become a near-ubiquitous presence in daily life. As more people use AI for everyday tasks, it’s increasingly treated as essential to living an efficient and manageable life. Most Christians I speak with understand that AI is a poor theologian and an inadequate substitute for real relationships. Yet they still wonder, Is it wrong to use a tool that promises efficiency and relief in a world where work is often exhausting? Like most technologies, AI is morally shaped by the hearts that use it. We’re also shaped by the technologies we use. Christians can use AI to more wisely steward the time and energy God has given us. However, our use of AI can also lead to sloth or neglect of our creativity and gifts. When it comes to AI, there’s no one-size-fits-all command for believers. As with other matters of conscience, we need to understand our temptations, study wisdom principles in Scripture, and lean on the Holy Spirit’s guidance. Here are three diagnostic questions to help you consider your use of AI in light of God’s original design for humanity. 1.  Am I using AI to push past my God-given limits? It takes mere seconds to type a question into ChatGPT and only a few more to have a wealth of knowledge at my fingertips. I input all my commitments, and AI generates the most efficient schedule to accomplish everything I desire. I input all my health concerns, and AI generates the optimal diet and exercise plan to keep me feeling young and healthy. With each new technological advance, we’re tempted to believe that God’s good boundaries no longer apply—that we can know more, do more, and exercise more control than we were meant to. If we’re not careful, we can use AI in an attempt to be gods over our own lives. We must remember we’re created in the image of a limitless God, yet with good limits. These limits aren’t imperfections for technology to overcome. They’re an invitation to rely more on our sovereign Creator, not on an LLM’s knowledge bank. Our limits are an invitation to rely more on our sovereign Creator, not on an LLM’s knowledge bank. The psalmist wrote about God’s omniscience, “This wondrous knowledge is beyond me. It is lofty; I am unable to reach it” (Ps. 139:6, CSB). Remembering that only God can and should know everything can help us resist the temptation to pursue knowledge and power that only belongs to him. 2. Am I using AI to replace wisdom gained from in-person relationships? Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, recently commented, “I cannot imagine . . . figuring out how to raise a newborn without ChatGPT.” I, on the other hand, cannot fathom raising children without the people God put in my life. I remember those weary newborn days when my mother-in-law folded my laundry while giving me tips on nursing. Our church preschool director dropped off dinner and her favorite children’s storybook Bible. I texted questions to other moms in our small group at all hours of the night. God created us to depend on one another. From the beginning, it wasn’t good for man to be alone. But he didn’t need an LLM to help him care for creation. Adam needed another human—“bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh” (Gen. 2:23). While I appreciate how LLMs quickly synthesize information, the best wisdom is often gained not from a bulleted list but from calling a godly friend. God has given us other human beings to sharpen us as iron sharpens iron (Prov. 27:17). Nothing is inherently evil about asking Gemini to help us manage our busy lives, but how much more might we be sanctified by asking an older woman at our church the same questions? Our AI use should never hinder the real human relationships for which God designed us. 3. Am I using AI to neglect the work God has entrusted to me? In the writing industry, I see a spectrum of AI use. Some won’t touch an LLM with a 10-foot pole. Others allow it to write initial drafts. I’ve often felt the urge to turn to ChatGPT when writing becomes too difficult. Why spend an hour laboring over the perfect sentence when AI can generate 10 good options in seconds? God made us to participate in his creative work on earth (Gen. 1:28). Before the curse, working with our hands and our minds to continue God’s work in creation was an integral part of humanity bearing God’s image. When we use AI to create for us, we need to consider what we’re giving up. The best wisdom is often gained not from a bulleted list but from calling a godly friend. AI can do many things, but it cannot magnify God’s beauty, goodness, and truth like humanity can. LLMs can assist us in our work, but they should never lead us to surrender that work for the sake of idleness. The purpose of AI shouldn’t be to create a work-free world. AI should never lead us to sloth—allowing technology to do what God has given us the energy and ability to do ourselves. Instead, believers can use AI to support, not supplant, the good work God sets before us. Be thoughtful and prayerful in how you engage with artificial intelligence. Seek the Holy Spirit’s guidance. Some Christians may choose to abstain from using AI, while others may set boundaries around their use. But for all believers, the call is the same: “Whether you [use AI or not], or whatever you do, do all to the glory of God” (1 Cor. 10:31).

There’s Hope in the Cultural Fight Against Pornography
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

There’s Hope in the Cultural Fight Against Pornography

The Emmy-winning miniseries Adolescence (2025) explores rising sexual entitlement and violence among young men. Much of the blame is directed at misogynistic influencers like Andrew Tate. But figures like Tate only affirm and perpetuate impulses young men have already internalized from a pornified culture. Journalist Jo Bartoscht and activist against child exploitation Robert Jessel make this case forcefully in their book, Pornocracy, arguing that pornography isn’t merely a private habit but a dominant cultural force deeply entrenched in modern social life. They define pornocracy as “a society in which political power, culture, relationships and identity are shaped or dominated by the purveyors of pornography” (1). Their central thesis is that we’re all subjects of the pornocracy, whether a creator, viewer, complacent bystander, or antiporn advocate. Our entire culture is being shaped by worldwide sexual exploitation. Pornification of Everything Pornocracy is a self-consciously feminist book, but Bartosch and Jessel more closely represent the second-wave feminism of the 1970s and ’80s than that of today, in both their condemnation of “sex work” and their approach toward men. The authors observe, “Half a century of feminist-led anti-porn theory has made a negligible impact on men’s willingness to be aroused by the degradation of women. To reduce the death grip of pornography on our culture and society, we have to convince men that porn hurts them” (37). This is likely why so much of contemporary antiporn literature focuses on addiction, loneliness, isolation, and self-esteem issues that arise from a pornified culture. It’s all true, but it’s shameful that the mass exploitation of women and children is an insufficient incentive to purge porn from every kilobyte of the digital domain. It’s shameful that the mass exploitation of women and children is an insufficient incentive to purge porn from every kilobyte of the digital domain. The authors emphasize how pornography disproportionately harms women, but they always have an eye toward how this has severed men and women from one another, separating sex from a sense of mutual self-giving and trust. “These men no longer have mutual sex”; they’re only using their sexual partners for self-gratification (48). Beyond the individual consequences of pornography consumption, Bartosch and Jessel offer an incisive exposé on the broader effects of the pornocracy, delving into the deepest and darkest corners of an industry whose annual revenue is twice as much as Hollywood’s. The research, statistics, and anecdotes are staggering, even for those with some background knowledge. For example, 88 percent of pornography performers experienced sexual abuse as children, and this abuse is perpetuated in the porn industry through verbal abuse, rape, physical assault, and third-party control. Investigations into sites like OnlyFans, which claim to be a more ethical avenue for sex work, reveal the same patterns of coercion, abuse, and sexual enslavement. Digital Natives Are ‘Porn Natives’ When porn consumption is so great and expansive, what does that mean for “digital natives” who have only ever known the digital age? It might be accurate to refer to Gen Z, Gen Alpha, and younger cohorts as “porn natives.” It’s the air they breathe. Like many young people, I saw pornography first as a preteen, before I’d ever kissed a girl or held her hand, or had any “sex talk” or “sex education.” Pornography was my sex education. According to a 2019 BBC survey of 18-to-25-year-olds, this is true for more than half (55 percent) of young men and 35 percent of young women. I can only imagine it’s much worse in 2026. It’s hard to wrap our minds around how catastrophic this is. For everyone—especially young men—sex has been irreversibly pornified. For many young men, all interactions with women are sexualized interactions. Perhaps most revealing, the authors of Pornocracy recount a report from someone in educational leadership, saying, “Practically each day we’d have an issue with some boy requesting nudes or asking for porn recommendations from female pupils, but it’s not necessarily malicious. . . . I’d say there’s a plurality of boys who don’t know how to talk to girls in a way that’s not overtly sexual” (62). They argue this is perpetuated by sex education curricula that promote “sex positivity” and the idea that “any sexual behavior is valid” (66). Pornography, they suggest, doesn’t satisfy sexual urges and preferences; it shapes and malforms them in increasingly perverse ways. The situation is dire. The book’s content is hard to stomach, and it’d probably be triggering for anyone with a history of sexual trauma. But we must understand how bad things are in order to imagine a future beyond the pornocracy. Third Way Forward In the concluding chapter, the two authors diverge paths and offer separate views on the path forward. These could broadly be categorized as a top-down approach (Bartosch) and a bottom-up approach (Jessel). Bartosch rightly lays out the positive steps that have come about recently through law and policy efforts, especially regarding age-verification laws for both pornography users and creators. For example, a woman named Laila Mickelwait has launched a political assault on pornography websites in recent years, causing PornHub to purge 91 percent of its catalogue (shrinking its inventory from 56 million to 5.2 million videos and images). For many young men, all interactions with women are sexualized interactions. This was achieved simply by targeting their potentially illegal content, where the accounts couldn’t verify the participants’ ages. Furthermore, rather than instituting age-verification laws for individuals accessing pornography, PornHub has completely backed out of 23 states (and counting). Bartosch desires to hold these companies accountable and punish criminal activity. But she wants to help those on both sides of the screen: the women and children being exploited and the men addicted to watching it happen. Part of that process includes porn-addiction being declared a public health concern and regulated on that basis. Jessel takes a different approach. He begins by questioning the pornocracy: “Where does its strength come from? How is it vulnerable? What does it fear?” He responds, “My answer to all three questions is the same. It is the consumer; the men, and some women, who sustain the industry” (141). We must become ashamed of pornography. Jessel concludes with a call to recover our humanity: We are creating new worlds where the mind has become disconnected from the body; where digital and physical reality are merging, blurring, queering. . . . Somehow we need to reforge the link between sexual intercourse and love—or, more fundamentally, simply to rediscover the joy of real sex. This alone would be a meaningful first step in the long journey to reconnect with what makes us human (144–45). There is so much correct in both these portraits. However, Jessel explicitly mentions that his objections to pornography are “strictly Darwinian” and “have little or nothing to do with faith-based morality” (142). On the contrary, this has everything to do with faith-based morality. Science lacks a firm basis for words like “evil” and “wrong”; only religion can fill those terms with real meaning. Nevertheless, we should be thankful for common grace, which enables nonbelievers and believers alike to recognize an objective moral evil. Neither Bartosch’s nor Jessel’s approach will solve every problem with pornography, though they certainly can help. We also need the church to proclaim the good news to sexual sinners, which would lead to them shaming the shameful, honoring the honorable, and consecrating what’s been desecrated. This book’s content is challenging and, at times, explicit. Nevertheless, Pornocracy presents a wake-up call for pastors, policy-makers, and parents alike. We’re making advancements toward justice, but new enemies are underfoot with the dawning of AI, sex robots, and the systematic depersonalization of sex. We must press on toward a new sexual revolution that more closely reflects God’s moral order.

Music and Liturgy in the Local Church
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

Music and Liturgy in the Local Church

In this thoughtful conversation recorded at TGC25, Matt Boswell, Ligon Duncan, Keith Getty, and Sandy Willson discuss the liturgical practices that have formed American evangelical worship. They talk about the influence of contemporary music and the need for biblically directed worship. Listen to hear what encourages the panelists about the growth of the global church, as well as what liturgical practices they’d like to see reformed. In This Episode 00:00 – Introduction and opening prayer 02:26 – Importance of music and liturgy in the church 06:53 – Encouragements and concerns in the American evangelical church 16:06 – The role of the pastor in liturgy and worship 23:07 – Practical tips for effective worship 46:05 – Keys to framing a worshipful liturgy 52:06 – Closing remarks and prayer Resource Mentioned: The Sing! Hymnal SIGN UP for one of our newsletters to stay informed about TGC’s latest resources. Help The Gospel Coalition renew and unify the contemporary church in the ancient gospel: Give today. Don’t miss an episode of The Gospel Coalition Podcast: Apple Podcasts Spotify YouTube

The Burden of Guilt - Greg Laurie Devotion - April 17, 2026
Favicon 
www.christianity.com

The Burden of Guilt - Greg Laurie Devotion - April 17, 2026

Discover the profound difference between godly sorrow and worldly guilt, and how understanding this distinction is crucial for spiritual growth and salvation. Uncover how to navigate feelings of guilt, discern its true source, and embrace God's forgiveness to live a life free from its paralyzing grip.

The Top 10 Questions Christians Are Still Debating
Favicon 
www.christianity.com

The Top 10 Questions Christians Are Still Debating

There may be unity within the Body of Christ on some core doctrines, but there is still much that Christians debate and disagree on ...