Would Charlie Kirk have supported the Death Penalty for his assassin? His actual answer might surprise you! I’ve seen a ton of people online saying Charlie surely wouldn’t support that because he was a Christian. And while I appreciate the intent behind that sentiment, it’s not what Charlie would have said. How do I know? Because luckily we have a VAST database of him speaking on virtually any topic you can think of, and a big hat tip to my friend Pepe Deluxe for finding this clip. Watch Charlie answer that question himself — not just giving a simplistic “love everyone” message but weighing the balance between Grace and Justice in the Bible.  Too often we go 100% Grace or 100% Justice and each of those is dangerous.  Charlie brilliantly navigated both in this answer: WATCH: Charlie Kirk on the death penalty pic.twitter.com/RNrIQVW4xS — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 16, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT HERE IF READING IS BETTER FOR YOU: It’s like, yeah, we’re pro-choice, but then when it comes to like vaccinations and my body, my choice, suddenly they’re not so pro-choice anymore. I feel like conservatives do the same thing, but on the pro-life side. So can you ex—can you defend—I mean, come on man, you seem so much smarter than that. What do you think my answer is? I don’t—’Cause they did something bad? Well, yeah. But if life is—and, and, and—invaluable—well then why do you not consider it valuable throughout the whole lifespan, not just the beginning? Well, ’cause you believe in putting criminals in jail, right? Yes. Which is a taking of their rights. Not their life. Well, again, but their whole life is completely changed. So I guess it’s— Right. Also an insult to the victim, isn’t it, saying that your life doesn’t matter so much, that your murderer can keep on living but you yourself aren’t living? It’s— Well— Actually devalues the value of the victim— Mm-hmm. Or the victims, actually, in a lot of times. Mm-hmm. And you have a hat that says, “Make America Holy Again.” Yes. God repeated in all 5 books of the Torah, “You take a life, your life will be taken.” To the consistency argument, if there is a baby here, you know, in the womb, that baby has done nothing wrong, whereas a guy who went and shot up a school did a lot wrong. Mm-hmm. And so the only answer is to say, “We value human life so much that you don’t get to keep on living if you take a precious human life.” It’s actually an explicitly pro-life position because it’s honoring the dead and honoring the victim so much that it’s not just one to be discarded. That’s, oh, it’s not just a clump of cells. You see, to be against the death penalty is actually consistent for the left because they’re like, “Oh, you know, it’s just a bunch of clump of cells that got shot up at a school. It doesn’t really matter. Go put them in a jail.” Where we say, “No, that’s a life you took and you don’t get to, get to keep on having breath if you go take another precious human life.” Mm-hmm. Does that make sense? It makes sense. Share!