by Jim Rickards If you have any money in the markets… Public Law 63-43 could have a huge impact on your wealth in 2026. You see, three simple words buried deep in Section 10 of this 112-year old little-known law… Grants President Trump the power to make this critical move on May 15th. President Trump himself has confirmed the plan is already in motion. As a former advisor to the CIA, the Pentagon and the White House… I know for a fact there are meetings taking place right now behind closed doors in the White House. His entire administration is preparing for it. I recommend you prepare as well. Click here to see the details because I believe this single move will help unleash a historical supercycle of wealth… That “gift” will make a lot of patriots rich on America’s 250th anniversary. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)

If he wanted to, President Trump really could have an amazing career as a standup comedian. Check out this hilarious story he tells about his fat friend who is now “fatter than ever” because Ozempic did not work for him. Absolute comedy gold! Watch here: BREAKING: President Trump tells friend Ozempic does not work on him after he gained weight. pic.twitter.com/yBVYzimQdC — Leading Report (@LeadingReport) January 16, 2026 Backup here if needed: Honestly one of the funniest things I’ve seen in a really long time. I think I laughed at that short story more than most actual standup comedians doing their routines! We also got this moment yesterday which is also great — what a perfect one-liner and incredible timing: Where? Trump is the Goat pic.twitter.com/kMOEK2iQBo — G-PA (@IndianaGPA) January 15, 2026 Or how about Trump if he were doing Seinfeld? It’s so good! Trump Does A Seinfeld – Toilets and Showers These continue to crack me up! It's pure perfection.... You add the Seinfeld music, a few cut scenes to a standup crowd, and it's wild! It's not just funny, it's almost perfectly Jerry's comedic timing. Cracks me up every time, and this is one someone actually special requested. In the last video, one of the comments said "You have to do the toilets and showers bit next" and apparently their wish was granted. Enjoy: Backup here: https://rumble.com/v3qsnoa--trumpfeld-trump-does-a-seinfeld-toilets-and-showers.html And if you missed some of the old ones, I have them for you below.... Trump Does A Seinfeld -- Part 3 There is so much creativity out there in MAGA world... I supposed I should say I'm not sure if these are made in loving admiration or more mean-spirited, but I think they're hilarious and also kind of uncanny. It's amazing how you just slap some Seinfeld music over the top of some of the hilarious things Trump says and it feels literally like a Seinfeld routine. Not just a "comedy routine" but specifically Seinfeld. So I take them in the sense that imitation is the highest form of flattery and I think they're hilarious. I'll post the prior ones down below, but first enjoy this: People are loving it: If you loved that, here is the original... Trump Does A Seinfeld! Every so often, I find something that REALLY makes me laugh. There are a lot of things that I just kind of chuckle at... Things that are amusing... But then every so often you find something that literally makes you laugh out loud. It's only 43 seconds but I found it today. Somebody took President Trump's riff on paper straws from 2 years ago and put some Seinfeld music behind it and the result is pure perfection! His timing is perfect and the material is classic Jerry Seinfeld observational humor. Enjoy this one: Backup here: Trump does a Seinfeld routine! I'm dying! ??? pic.twitter.com/iQJOm8eN2B — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) June 27, 2023 Here are my top three favorite comments in response... First: Genius editing! If you can edit like this, contact me and I want to hire you! Then I gotta say I agree with this next one: Jerry is good, but he's not topping this delivery! And of course we have to end with my favorite: Jerk Store! I shoulda said Jerk Store! Meanwhile, on a more serious note, what do REAL comedians think of Trump jokes? Two of the best out there on my list are the aforementioned Jerry Seinfeld and then in the George Washington slot on Mt. Rushmore it would be Norm Macdonald. The best of the best. What do these guys think about comedians attacking Trump with "jokes"? They don't like it. They don't find it funny. They think it's lazy. And they're right. The late night TV hosts attacking Trump night after night often times don't even have a punchline, it's just hatred of Donald Trump. That's comedy now? Maybe we should listen to two of the best to ever do it. Here's Jerry Seinfeld's take: And here's Norm, on all things Trump. You gotta love Norm's story about asking Trump for a picture on Jimmy Fallon, it's hilarious. But then Norm gets serious and as he so often does, Norm can changes gears from going 100 miles per hour on something outrageously wild and inappropriate and hilarious to being deeply introspective and insightful. And that's what he does here. Norm was asked about Alec Baldwin's impersonation of Trump and Norm had a brilliant take. Norm said if you're impersonating someone, you have to actually like that person...because they instinctively like themselves. So any impersonation that starts off with hatred for the person is doomed to fail. Brilliant insight. Watch here: Now back to my prior point... I'm curious how this will end up in the Comments below, but I want your take on TOP TEN best comedians. And set aside if they became Far-Left later in life. I'm talking about in their prime, who was the funniest? In no particular order except for Norm at #1, here's a first draft of my list: 1 - Norm Macdonald 2 - Dave Chappelle 3 - Jim Gaffigan 4 - Sebastian Maniscalco (I don't consider Sebastian a physical comedian, although most do) 5 - Mitch Hedburg 6 - Chris Rock 7 - Steve Martin (one of the rare physical comedians I like) 8 - George Carlin 9 - ??? 10 - ??? Help me out, who gets 9 and 10? Eddie? Robin? Pryor? Patrice? Rickles? Not making even my Top 20 are: Louis CK - sorry I just don't find him funny Amy Schumer - need I say more? John Mulaney Hey, on a different topic, can I get your vote on this please? We're trying to make this a landslide and I need your help: NATIONAL POLL: Who Should Go To GITMO, Trump or Biden? They've even got Matt Gaetz doing one and it's also pretty good! Matt Gaetz Does A Seinfeld What's the dealllll with Kevin McCarthy? Ok, that's not the setup to an actual joke, but if it was Jerry Seinfeld could do it! But what I really want to show you is this hilarious clip from Matt Gaetz. I can't tell if they used a little AI to give his voice that classic "Seinfeld" tone the way he finishes each sentence with a slightly upturned humorous tone? Or if simply slapping the Seinfeld music under the track was enough, but this is hilarious. Every once in a while you have to just stop and laugh and this is one of those times. So enjoy this, here is Matt Gaetz doing a Seinfeld routine: Matt Gaetz doing his best Jerry Seinfeld impression when talking about our money being devalued. pic.twitter.com/xPtq7itvi0 — illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) September 28, 2023 Backup here: https://rumble.com/v3lnf2o--matt-gaetz-does-a-seinfeld....html My only complaint is it isn't longer!

Folks, you can’t make this stuff up! And I’m not telling you this is 100% proof of a grand conspiracy, but at this point what are the odds? For years, we thought Charlie was just married to some sweet housewife named Erika Kirk and the two just randomly met and fell in love. It turns out, she lived a WILD life before him, appearing in CIA documentaries, deep connections to military bases and Government contractors, she appeared in music videos, and now we add one more to the list: she apparently starred in a movie where she is a military assassin and at one one she’s seen on the roof with a sniper rifle. Come on folks, what are the odds? See here: YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS UP: Photo of Erika Frantzve on a roof with a sniper rifle from the military assassination movie she starred in. She is quite the actress…. credit to @randomlytiffany https://t.co/kAyfsWAChc pic.twitter.com/IZogvtB42t — Sword Truth (@SwordTruth) January 16, 2026 Now the big question: But is that true? Grok confirms it’s real: Key Details About the Photo and Project The image in question shows Erika Frantzve (now Erika Kirk) on a rooftop in what looks like a military/tactical pose with a rifle, positioned as a sniper. This is presented as a behind-the-scenes or promotional still from the film November Renaissance, filmed primarily around 2012–2017 with some sources citing 2013 specifically for certain shoots. Location: Multiple posts, including direct references from users and threads, tie the filming to Fort Huachuca (a U.S. Army installation in Sierra Vista, Arizona, known for intelligence, electronic warfare, and testing).1 Posts explicitly label it as Fort Huachuca 2012-17, and some include additional stills or video clips from the same shoot/environment. Film Context: November Renaissance (sometimes subtitled The Open Source Decade) was an ambitious but unreleased indie sci-fi thriller/short film project. It explored themes of corporate espionage, cyber warfare, nanotechnology, brain chips/mind control, hackers as vigilantes, and assassins in a near-future setting.2 Erika Frantzve had a starring role (likely as a character like Evelyn Mathis). The director was Clayton Haugen, with ties to Arizona’s defense/tech scene. Production Status: It began as a proof-of-concept short, with crowdfunding attempts and on-location shoots involving military gear/veterans. It never received an official release, which fuels speculation about why it was shelved (budget issues, creative differences, etc.). Trailers/clips exist on platforms like Vimeo, and scene grabs have resurfaced recently. Evidence Supporting Authenticity Multiple X users (including veterans and people connected to the production) have come forward to confirm Erika’s presence at Fort Huachuca for this project. Additional photos and video clips from the same shoot (e.g., photoshoot sequences, other stills shared in threads) have emerged, showing consistency in style, clothing, setting, and people involved. The story gained traction after mentions by figures like Candace Owens, who highlighted the film’s existence and Erika’s involvement, prompting further digging and resurfacing of old materials. No credible sources (reverse image searches, fact-checks, or mainstream reports in the results) label this specific photo as AI-generated, photoshopped, or a deepfake. In contrast, unrelated viral images tied to other controversies have been called out as fake in different threads. Why It’s Surfacing Now (January 2026 Context) This photo and the film have exploded in conspiracy-oriented discussions following Charlie Kirk’s assassination in September 2025. Theorists draw parallels between the movie’s themes (assassins, snipers, mind control/tech dystopia) and the real-life rooftop shooter scenario, plus Erika’s post-assassination role as TPUSA CEO. It’s often framed as suspicious predictive programming or evidence of deeper connections (military-intel ties via her family background in Arizona’s defense sector). Caveats While the photo itself checks out as genuine production material from the era, the broader conspiracy claims (e.g., Erika as a handler, CIA links, or direct involvement in events) remain unverified speculation with no hard proof in public sources. Mainstream coverage of Erika Kirk focuses on her as a businesswoman, nonprofit founder, and grieving widow who took over TPUSA with no mention of this film project in her official bios or IMDB (which lists only minor TV/appearance credits). In short: The photo is legitimate BTS material from an obscure, unfinished indie film Erika starred in over a decade ago. The timing and thematic overlap are what make it go viral now, but the image itself holds up. More here: WTF – Real photoshoot video with Erika Frantzve (Kirk) takes a creepy turn after her photo as a sniper on the roof at Fort Huachuca in a military assassination movie she starred in resurfaces https://t.co/MrlT1gpBcC pic.twitter.com/1vIUkgE28e — Sword Truth (@SwordTruth) January 16, 2026 Did you notice all the references above to Fort Huachuca? I’m not saying everything that comes from Candace Owens should be treated as gospel truth, but Candace has been hammering the connections to Fort Huachuca for a while now. Check this out: CONFIRMED: THREE SEPARATE SOURCES Place Erika Kirk at Fort Huachuca Intel Base DAYS Before Charlie Kirk’s ASSASSINATION – Plus SECRET Film Project on Mind Control & ASSASSINS Shot There! Candace locks it in: Erika DEFINITELY knows Fort Huachuca – she filmed a teaser for… https://t.co/DvDvt2Rm5n pic.twitter.com/QPLRu9P7Yd — Project Constitution (@ProjectConstitu) January 15, 2026 CONFIRMED: THREE SEPARATE SOURCES Place Erika Kirk at Fort Huachuca Intel Base DAYS Before Charlie Kirk’s ASSASSINATION – Plus SECRET Film Project on Mind Control & ASSASSINS Shot There! Candace locks it in: Erika DEFINITELY knows Fort Huachuca – she filmed a teaser for “November Renaissance” (2010-2013) on/near the base! Plot? Corporate espionage, assassins, nanotech hacking minds to create “false realities” & transfer skills (e.g., Navy SEAL abilities). Director Clayton Hogan: “Manipulate senses so they believe a false reality… brain as hard drive, knowledge installed like programs.” Cast/crew? All military-linked: Clayton Hogan (defense contractor marketing), Don Fry (trained at Huachuca), Peyton McCormick (dad Lt. Col. at base, Miss Teen USA 2006), Priscilla Newell (dad Lt. at base), etc. Kickstarter raised funds but NEVER released – updates stopped 2017. Plus: 3 independent sources confirm Erika THERE Sept 8-9, 2025 – insider post deleted after backlash; friends verify; military chat mentions “order to lower drones.” Erika denies, but TPUSA PR (Andrew Kolvet) panics with over-the-top alibis (wrong dates, pillow forts?). Handlers from day one? Military intel op mirroring film themes – false narratives, control? Ties right into Charlie probe: Groomed, elevated, martyred? Candace: “Panic is obvious… getting very interesting.” Watch & judge! RELATED REPORTS: JUST IN: Newly Surfaced Video Shows Erika Kirk Hosting 2013 CIA Documentary About EMP Attacks Comedian Connects The Dots On Erika Kirk Charlie Kirk “Snake Eyes” UPDATE Yesterday, I brought you this really strange (but fact-checked 100% true) report about the impossible-to-believe connections between Charlie Kirk and the 1998 Nicolas Cage movie "Snake Eyes". If you haven't seen that yet, you can see my full report here and no exaggeration this honestly will blow your mind: This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk — How Is This Even Real? And while there are too many "coincidences" in there to believe are just random chance, there's actually one more that I missed. Hat tip to my friend MJTruth who caught it. It turns out that in the 1998 movie, a plot element is a Hurricane named JEZEBEL striking the New Jersey coast. Take a look here: UPDATE: Charlie Kirk — It just got weird… The 1998 movie Snake Eyes is about a corrupt cop, who uncovers a conspiracy surrounding a political assassination at a public heavyweight boxing event. In the movie, Charles Kirkland, the Secretary of Defense, was assassinated by a… pic.twitter.com/V0Z8ZjVO3L — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 25, 2025 UPDATE: Charlie Kirk — It just got weird… The 1998 movie Snake Eyes is about a corrupt cop, who uncovers a conspiracy surrounding a political assassination at a public heavyweight boxing event. In the movie, Charles Kirkland, the Secretary of Defense, was assassinated by a gunshot to the neck. Charlie Kirk Charles Kirkland The assassination of Charles Kirkland in the movie took place in September. But wait… it gets even weirder. In the film, the heavyweight fight who “Took the Fall”, is named Lincoln TYLER, who allowed the assassin to get away, drawing parallels to TYLER Robinson, who is believed to be the fall guy. Don’t leave just yet, it gets even weirder Part of the movie was shot at the Trump Taj Mahal Hotel & Casino, in Atlantic City. Gilbert Powell—the sleazy arena director and defense contractor is explicitly noted as a character based on Donald Trump. Gilbert Powell was part of the plot to orchestrate the assassination as part of a conspiracy involving a missile defense system deal. In the movie, Dunne confessed that the trip to Norfolk was for a test of the AirGuard missile defense system, which Powell's company was backing. He deduces that the sniper, a known Palestinian terrorist named Tariq Rabat, who was protesting weapons shipments to Israel, learned of the test and assassinated Kirkland in order to stop the sale of the system to the US government. Also notable, throughout the film, a Hurricane named JEZEBEL strikes the Atlantic City coastline. —— this is also notable given that we just learned that a popular website named Jezebel allegedly worked with an Etsy witch to cast a curse/Vex on Charlie Kirk. That is just weird… Ok, so that's it right there at the end. If you didn't catch it, allow me to connect the dots for you. Last week, we were one of the first to bring you reports that a group of Witches on Etsy were paid to put a curse on Charlie Kirk just days before his assassination. That report was confirmed yesterday by Megyn Kelly: UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Witchcraft Confirmed So, what's the connection to Jezebel? A far-left website called Jezebel.com proudly bragged about how they had paid the Witches on Etsy to "curse" Charlie Kirk. So there's your JEZEBEL connection folks! I am seriously asking you, how many "coincidences" does it take before it becomes statistically impossible? I think wherever that line is, we have crossed it. That's just my opinion. And allow me to address the Witchcraft issue, because I've seen all of your emails and complaints about the fact that I covered this story. I want to address two things on this point... First, for those of you emailing me saying Witchcraft is not real and I shouldn't be talking about fake, made-up stuff like that, I'm sorry but the Bible disagrees with you.  I'm not following it or promoting it, but the Bible does make very clear that it's very real and we are to avoid it: Old Testament Exodus 22:18 — “You shall not permit a sorceress to live.” Leviticus 19:26 — “You shall not eat anything with the blood, nor practice divination or soothsaying.” Leviticus 20:6 — “If a person turns to mediums and familiar spirits, to prostitute himself with them, I will set My face against that person and cut him off from his people.” Leviticus 20:27 — “A man or a woman who is a medium or who has familiar spirits shall surely be put to death.” Deuteronomy 18:10–12 — “There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. For all who do these things are an abomination to the Lord.” 2 Kings 9:22 — “...the harlotries of your mother Jezebel and her witchcraft are so many.” 2 Chronicles 33:6 — [Of Manasseh] “Also he caused his sons to pass through the fire in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom; he practiced soothsaying, used witchcraft and sorcery, and consulted mediums and spiritists.” Micah 5:12 — “I will cut off sorceries from your hand, and you shall have no soothsayers.” Nahum 3:4 — “Because of the multitude of harlotries of the seductive harlot, the mistress of sorceries, who sells nations through her harlotries, and families through her sorceries.” New Testament Acts 8:9–11 — Simon the sorcerer “astonished the people of Samaria, claiming that he was someone great… they heeded him because he had astonished them with his sorceries.” Acts 13:6–8 — Elymas the sorcerer opposed Paul and Barnabas. Acts 19:19 — Many who had practiced magic brought their books and burned them publicly. Galatians 5:19–21 — Witchcraft (sorcery) is listed among the works of the flesh: “Now the works of the flesh are evident: adultery, fornication... idolatry, sorcery... those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.” Revelation 9:21 — “And they did not repent of their murders or their sorceries or their sexual immorality or their thefts.” Revelation 18:23 — “For by your sorcery all the nations were deceived.” Revelation 21:8 — “But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers... shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone.” Revelation 22:15 — “But outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie.” Ok, so that's the first thing. Second thing, for everyone emailing me to say a Christian like Charlie Kirk cannot be cursed by Witchcraft, I'm not entirely sure that is true.  The Bible makes very clear that on this Earth we are engaged in a spiritual war.  And in war there are casualties.  If being a Christian gave you a magical cloak where nothing bad could ever happen to you, that would be nice but it's not what the Bible (or life experience) teaches us. But either way, whichever way you believe on that topic, that's not the point of my reporting.  The point of my reporting is that this event happened and it's very disturbing.  And according to Megyn Kelly, Charlie and Erika were aware of it and were very disturbed themselves, calling close trusted friends in for prayer. Those are the reports directly from Megyn Kelly.  I'm just the messenger.  Believe whatever you want to believe, but the Jezebel / Etsy / Witchcraft Curse timeline did happen.  Make of it what you will. Here was my original report in case you missed it: This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk -- How Is This Even Real? If you do not like "Conspiracy Theories" tune out now! Actually, I take that back.  That's not fair. What I'm about to show you is not a Conspiracy Theory of any kind.  What I'm about to show you is simply FACTS that I have fact-checked myself and found to be 100% true. The conclusion you want to draw after hearing these facts is up to you. Sound good? Ok, let's dig in because I am about to completely blow your mind. Do you remember the 1998 movie "Snake Eyes" starring Nicolas Cage? It was a great movie, and in fact in hindsight Nicolas Cage has put out a ton of iconic movies. Ever seen "Matchstick Men"?  Such a great and underrated movie! But back to "Snake Eyes"... This movie, released in 1998 (when Charlie Kirk would have been 5 years old), features all of the following: A politician named Charles Kirkland (gee, kind of sounds like Charlie Kirk doesn't it?) Charles Kirkland is assassinated Charles Kirkland is shot in the neck The assassination happens on September 10th (Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10th) There is a boxer in the movie named Tyler whose nickname is "The Executioner" For those of you into such things, the names "Tyler Robinson" and "Lincoln Tyler" in reverse ordinal gematria both total 165 Oh and it's currently the Chinese Year of the ..... Snake (Snake Eyes) I will document each of these things down below to show you it's fact-checked 100% true, but for now just watch this: There are NO COINCIDENCES. The 1998 Movie "Snake Eyes" with actor Nicholas Cage, the politician CHARLES KIRKLAND is shot in the neck. In the movie, the shooting happens on SEPTEMBER 10th. Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck, in real life on September 10th. You just can't make… pic.twitter.com/zNiqchI4mK — The SCIF (@TheSCIF) September 24, 2025 TRANSCRIPT: There's a movie called Snake Eyes, which came out in 1998, and in that movie, U.S. politician Charles Kirkland is assassinated at a live event by a shot through the neck. Charles Kirkland, like Charles Kirk, and obviously Charlie Kirk was also shot in the neck allegedly, right? Well, in the movie Snake Eyes, the heavyweight boxer Lincoln Tyler is in the ring during the assassination. Tyler, like Tyler Robinson, and in gematria, Lincoln Tyler is 165, like Tyler Robinson is 165, and his nickname is The Executioner, okay? Well, the big part here, guys, in the movie Snake Eyes, the assassination occurs on September 10th. Charlie Kirk was allegedly assassinated on September 10th. Can you believe this, guys? You guys gotta share this with everyone you can. This is undeniable. And also see how Nicolas Cage is doing the hands like Charlie Kirk, also Donald Trump does that hand sign, and also we're in the Year of the Snake right now. It's called Snake Eyes. But wow, just, you put that all together — Charles Kirkland shot in the neck, Lincoln Tyler equals Tyler Robinson, and you're telling me the assassination in the movie happened on September 10th, the same day the Charlie Kirk event happened? Oh my goodness. And guys, I can't take credit for this. Um, shout out to Bernard Suarez, or Bernardo Suarez, sorry. Um, he left me this comment. I also saw him on the Ball Don’t Lie channel earlier tonight talking about this. He said, “Have you ever watched the '98 movie Snake Eyes where the character Charles Kirkland is assassinated with a shot in the neck, and there's a boxer named Tyler who has the nickname Executioner?” And then Decoding With Cody let me know that the shooting in the film is on September 10th. Backup video here if needed: This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk -- How Is This Real? pic.twitter.com/9oau2mIQb2 — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 24, 2025 Ok, now let me document and fact-check this for you. Let's start with the name, Charles Kirkland -- this is a pretty easy one to confirm: You can also confirm all of these by simply watching the movie too, by the way.  It's available on Paramount+. Notice how I am not asking ChatGPT leading questions... Next up, the assassination is confirmed -- it happens in the opening scene and forms the basis for the rest of the murder-mystery plot: Notice how ChatGPT does not know the September 10th date, but it's a good thing I'm smarter than these AI robots! You can still count on Noah to get the job done even when ChatGPT fails! In the opening scene, the camera very intentionally flashes to the marquee which confirms two things: the boxer name TYLER THE EXECUTIONER (note how TYLER is even emphasized) and the date of September 10th is clearly visible: That freeze frame is a LITTLE hard to read the 10th (could argue it's the 18th) but in the video it's pretty clear it's the 10th. You can watch the video here: Backup here if needed: Snake Eyes (1998): Opening Scene pic.twitter.com/cViTGeYwmQ — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 24, 2025 If that's not enough, you can confirm all of this in the written script that you can read on Scribd: Now the shot in the neck... Here's a screenshot of Charles Kirkland getting shot in the neck in the movie -- almost the EXACT identical same spot as Charlie Kirk: And it's not really my thing, but for those of you interested in this stuff, here is the Gematria name-value confirmation as well: And of course you know there's always going to be symbolism, right? How about flashing the "All Seeing Eye" in the air the moment before the shot rings out? Ok, now to steal a phrase from Steve Jobs and Columbo: "One more thing..." Remember what the tagline was from that movie? "Believe everything except your eyes." Wow. Look, I'm not saying I believe all of this proves it was fake and staged and Charlie is still alive....I'm not going there.  I'm just saying at what point does all of this become too much to be a coincidence? I'll let YOU answer that! I told you I was only going to report facts and that's what I did. What you do with this information is up to you... All just one big coincidence? I find that almost impossible to believe, but I am interested to hear your thoughts below! Noah out.

President Trump is set to issue a new pardon. A new report by Fox News has revealed that President Trump is set to pardon the former Governor of Puerto Rico. In the report, it was revealed that White House insiders have revealed that Trump is set to pardon Republican Governor Wanda Vazquez after she was indicted by the Biden DOJ on bribery charges. Fox News reported on the thought process behind Trump’s pardon: President Donald Trump will pardon former Puerto Rico Governor Wanda Vázquez Garced and her co-defendants, Fox News has learned. “This entire case is an example of political prosecution. In August of 2022, Wanda Vazquez faced bribery charges related to the financing of her 2020 gubernatorial campaign. Ms. Vazquez’ pardon materials state that there was never any element of a quid pro quo deal and that her prosecution was politically motivated. The investigation into Ms. Vazquez began 10 days after she endorsed President Trump in 2020,” a White House official told Fox News. The White House official also told Fox News that Trump will pardon Vázquez’s co-defendants, Julio Martin Herrera-Velutini and Mark Rossini, a former FBI agent. “The investigation, she contends, not only monitored her campaign, but also included a monitoring of the Trump campaign. Additionally, Ms. Vazquez believes that there was no bribery at all because the discussions with the banker concerned a matter of agreeing on policy with a potential donor, and not taking action in exchange for a material gain. This case bears similarities to that of Alexander Sittenfeld, who received a pardon in May of 2025,” the official added. In 2022, Vázquez was arrested on bribery charges linked to her 2020 campaign. She was accused of engaging in a bribery scheme from December 2019 through June 2020, according to The Associated Press. The outlet noted at the time that Vázquez was serving as governor when the alleged scheme unfolded. Here’s a photo of Vazquez when she was the Governor of Puerto Rico: BREAKING: President Trump is pardoning Puerto Rico’s former governor Wanda Vázquez, sources say. https://t.co/bu7Rtpv6TE — CBS Mornings (@CBSMornings) January 16, 2026 Bloomberg Law reported Vazquez’s initial acceptance of a plea deal: The Justice Department accused the legal team for Puerto Rico’s former governor of giving a judge a “completely fabricated” account of how prosecutors determined to settle her bribery case. Federal prosecutors were responding to the defense’s court filing Tuesday that sought to “clarify the record” by countering Bloomberg Law reporting that political pressure led DOJ leaders to dismiss the politician’s felony charges just ahead of trial. In a Wednesday filing, prosecutors didn’t dispute that political intervention prompted DOJ’s about-face to provide a more lenient plea deal. Instead, they contended counsel for former Gov. Wanda Vázquez Garced had falsified dialogue from their May meeting at department headquarters, including by fabricating a quote from DOJ leadership purporting to concede “the indictment has collapsed.” Prosecutors told the court Wednesday they stand by their case and are prepared to go to trial if necessary on the original felony allegations that Vázquez Garced, who endorsed President Donald Trump in 2020, took bribes from a billionaire bank owner who’s been represented since 2024 by Trump’s former defense lawyer. DOJ reached a plea deal in June with the defendants on a misdemeanor count of unlawful campaign contributions, which may allow them to avoid prison time. But rather than citing the settlement’s legal merits, prosecutors said in the Wednesday filing that the negotiated resolution was “consistent with the enforcement priorities of the Justice Department” and “served to conserve prosecutorial and judicial resources.” That contradicts the account presented a day earlier by Vázquez Garced’s legal team. Her lawyers argued that US District Judge Silvia L. Carreño-Coll “generated damaging media coverage” in Bloomberg Law “that distorts reality” by declaring in a July 8 order that the case settled through “directives presumably issued by Main Justice.” Rather than DOJ political leadership ordering prosecutors to settle, the former governor’s attorneys said the department was persuaded by the defense’s presentation of new evidence disclosing weaknesses in the government’s case. “When confronted with the overwhelming evidence that contradicted their conspiracy theory,” the defense lawyers said in their filing, “prosecutors could not provide reasonable explanations for proceeding with the indictment.” When Associate Deputy Attorney General Aakash Singh, who was leading the May meeting, asked prosecutors why they proceeded with the indictment, “their response was simply: ‘We took our chances,’” Vázquez Garced’s lawyers added. President Trump, in December of last year, pardoned Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-Texas), who was also indicted on bribery charges. Take a look: I want to thank President Trump for his tremendous leadership and for taking the time to look at the facts. I thank God for standing with my family and I during this difficult time. This decision clears the air and lets us move forward for South Texas. This pardon gives us a… pic.twitter.com/ajNvHq6rG0 — Rep. Henry Cuellar (@RepCuellar) December 3, 2025 However, shortly after Trump pardoned Cuellar, the former lawmaker announced he was running again for Congress, which infuriated Trump. NEW: Trump says he’s now fighting to remove “weak and incompetent” Texas Democrat Henry Cuellar from Congress. Trump recently pardoned Cuellar while he was facing 20 years in prison for bribery and money laundering — and Cuellar thanked him by running again as a Democrat. pic.twitter.com/sH0bl3vu9a — johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) January 6, 2026

First Lady Melania Trump has given her views on the emergence of artificial intelligence. Melania attended the virtual “Zoom Ahead: AI for Tomorrow’s Leaders” event on Friday afternoon and gave her opinion on AI. The First Lady, during a Zoom meeting with Zoom CEO Eric Yuan, shared that AI is ushering in the Age of Imagination but urged young people to continue thinking for themselves and not become completely dependent on AI. Newsmax provided in-depth details on Melania Trump’s remarks: First lady Melania Trump delivered a message of encouragement and caution to young Americans on Friday, calling artificial intelligence a powerful tool for creativity while warning against relying on it as a substitute for independent thought. “We are living in the age of imagination,” Trump said in a speech that aired on Newsmax, describing the moment as a “new era powered by artificial intelligence,” where curiosity can be satisfied “almost magically” and “in seconds.” In her remarks, Trump framed AI as a catalyst for learning and creative exploration, telling students they are “fortunate to have the capability to fulfill your dreams through the power of learning,” with AI acting as “the primary engine for creative exploration.” She emphasized that curiosity remains the common thread behind human progress, pointing to history’s most celebrated innovators. “The world’s greatest minds, our writers, architects, scientists, and painters, all had endless interests about human nature,” Trump said, adding that they questioned what had not yet been answered. Trump challenged young people to imagine using AI to build ambitious projects from home, including films, fashion brands, and art. “Are you ready to produce your own movie?” she asked. “Do you want to build the next Dress to Impress Empire? Have you ever wondered how to become the next master artist? Create your own song.” She noted that for the first time, aspiring creators can develop “movie characters, scripts, fashion, music, art, the entire ecosystem,” using AI tools. But she argued the real starting point is not software, but mindset. “What do you need to start? You need to harness your imagination,” Trump said. She described the most valuable modern skill as “knowing what to ask, why it matters,” and learning to think beyond easy answers. Here’s a clip of Melania’s speech: ‘Never surrender your thinking to AI’ — Melania Trump ‘Use AI as a tool, but do not let it replace your personal intelligence’ pic.twitter.com/eW52PxTZPs — RT (@RT_com) January 16, 2026 The White House provided the full transcript of Melania’s speech: Thank you, Mr. Yuan, Zoom’s leadership in the TechEd space is unmatched. Your support directly advances my mission to prepare America’s next generation to use AI to enhance their education, and ultimately their careers. Indeed, this is an incredible time. We are living in the Age of Imagination. The Age of Imagination is a new era, powered by artificial intelligence, where one’s curiosity can be satisfied almost magically, in seconds. You are fortunate to have the capability to fulfill your dreams through the power of learning, with AI serving as the primary engine for creative exploration. History reminds us that curiosity is the driving force behind every great achievement. The world’s greatest minds – our writers, architects, scientists, and painters – all had endless interest about human nature, and they all questioned that which was yet to be answered. Are you ready to produce your own movie? Do you want to build the next Dress to Impress empire? Have you ever wondered how to become the next master artist? Create your own song? Every giant, at some point in time, questions the status quo. Their singular vision pushes humanity in a new direction. Artificial intelligence is changing today’s world, and your curiosity should serve as the driving force. For the first time in history, the young girl dreaming of becoming a fashion designer and the young boy who wants to stand-up his cool animated superhero series can do so, from their own home. Artificial Intelligence provides all the tools needed to implement your creative vision – today. You can develop movie characters, scripts, fashion, music, art – the entire ecosystem. All with AI. But, what do you need to start? You need to harness your Imagination. In the new AI era, the most powerful skill is knowing what to ask, why it matters, and how to think beyond the first answer. I encourage you to be stubbornly curious, think outside the box, and question everything. Creators must stretch their minds to think differently. The world of possibility is endless, and AI is extending the conceptual in ways never dreamed of before. In the past, memorization unlocked opportunity. Today, your curiosity will open new doors to meaning, innovation, and leadership. But we must remember, although artificial intelligence can generate images and information, only humans can generate meaning and purpose. Deep thinking, patience, and staying curious are where purpose begins. Today, I urge you to take action: use AI to unlock new parts of your imagination. Lead with your ideas, stay sharp, but remember – never surrender your thinking to AI. Choose to let your imagination drive your intellectual progress. But never use AI as a quick solution. Be intellectually honest with yourself – use AI as a tool – but do not let it replace your personal intelligence. Pursue understanding with passion like no generation before. Make an impact. Knowledge is power. Nobody can take it away from you. Good luck and wishing you a successful year ahead! Watch the First Lady’s full speech below: CURIOSITY FOR INTELLECTUAL FREEDOM First Lady Melania Trump Inspires America’s Children to be Curious, Use AI to Achieve their Career Ambitions during @Zoom Ahead: AI for Tomorrow’s Leaders event. pic.twitter.com/gFBDEebp9U — First Lady Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) January 16, 2026