Glenn Beck just covered something that I haven’t seen anyone else covering, at least not anyone I have seen. A new 250-page bombshell report seems to confirm fraud in Georgia in 2020 on multiple levels and in multiple ways, culminating possibly in more votes than people! Let’s start here with a quick summary: @FDRLST The Election Oversight Group’s 250-page report points to incidents that appear to exceed election worker incompetence and ‘clerical errors’.~Here Are The Top 6 Takeaways From Georgia’s Suspect 2020 Election~1. ‘Callous Disregard’One thing is for certain: Fulton County… pic.twitter.com/mmo0becf2Y — Average Joe Patriot 1776 (@AJPArmy) February 10, 2026 The Election Oversight Group’s 250-page report points to incidents that appear to exceed election worker incompetence and ‘clerical errors’. ~Here Are The Top 6 Takeaways From Georgia’s Suspect 2020 Election~ 1. ‘Callous Disregard’ One thing is for certain: Fulton County elections officials are extremely anxious to get their election records back. 2. ‘It Wouldn’t Probably Be Enough’ The report’s overview notes the beaming confidence of Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger on the morning after the election. 3. Chain Trouble The report details a significant chain of custody problem. All 148,000-plus absentee ballots that flooded into the system were “accepted and counted without first performing mandatory signature verification,” according to the review. 4. Missing Tapes As The Federalist reported, an attorney representing Fulton County admitted in December that county election officials failed to properly sign more than 100 “tabulator tapes”, amounting to about 315,000 votes cast during Georgia’s early-voting period. 5. Counting Conundrum The number of absentee ballots counted doesn’t match the number of credited voters, the report notes. It draws from Fulton County and state records that show 148,318 ballots were counted in the 2020 election, although only 125,784 voters were recorded as casting an absentee ballot 6. ‘Reason to Distrust the Election Outcome’ The report notes some troubling findings from a review of Fulton County’s practices and procedures in the 2020 presidential election I thought Glenn’s analysis was so good I put together the whole transcript so you can watch or read below. Here you go: FULL TRANSCRIPT: YES Speaker: Glenn Beck Okay, so this 250-page report has come out from the Election Oversight Group. The reason why I want to talk to you about this today is because of what happened with Pam Bondi yesterday. And I honestly, I need some new insight on this because I just don’t know where to go with this Pam Bondi thing. I thought it was not good yesterday. I just don’t think she’s capable of fixing the errors that have just piled up and we have to fix the DOJ. It must be fixed because there’s too many important things that are riding on it. One thing that they are doing that is right is the Fulton County, Georgia situation with the election of 2020. The morning after the election, just to remind you, Georgia’s Secretary of State went on national television and said 4.7 million votes had been cast. He said only about 2% remain to be counted, which is roughly 94,000 ballots. And he said at this moment, the margin is decisive. He even suggested if one candidate won 100% of all of the outstanding votes, it’s not going to change the outcome. But when the final tally first came in, the total wasn’t 4.7 million votes that had been cast. It was 5.023 million. Okay. Wait, what? And in Fulton County alone, the absentee ballots reportedly rose from 74,000 to more than 148,000 between election night and final certification. Where did that come from? And that’s why this shift happened which reversed the apparent outcome of the state. That’s why Donald Trump was like, “Wait a minute, cheating is going on.” The report now states no known explanation has been provided to justify the surge. Pause. If the numbers change by that magnitude after officials publicly declare with near final certainty, then again, we’ve got to get it right. Not almost right. We need it right. We don’t need defensiveness or dismissal. We need clarity. The report then goes into the chain of custody. Okay, listen to this. Investigators found that 148,000 absentee ballots were accepted and counted without first performing mandatory signature verification. Tens of thousands allegedly arrived at State Farm Arena in unsecured mail carts. Wait, what? Do you know what chain of custody is? Chain of custody is really important. It’s not a partisan phrase. It is a basic legal principle. Chain of custody comes into play a lot of times in criminal trials, also financial audits. When you gather evidence, you have to know who had that evidence. That’s one of the problems with the Epstein files. What’s the chain of custody? You had all the evidence. Whose hands were on that? You have to know. And if the chain of custody breaks, then you can’t rely on that being reliable anymore. You can’t count that as reliable information because you don’t know how it got from this place to the next place. Okay. The next thing they found was the missing tabulator tapes. This is really important because election law requires daily zero tapes. What that means is it is a check to prove the machine starts at zero. It requires closing tapes to document the total at the day’s end. Okay, so it proved it was at zero and then it proves that this is the number of votes that came in. According to testimony cited in the report, more than 100 required tabulator tapes representing about 315,000 early votes weren’t signed or weren’t signed properly. State investigators say they couldn’t locate the required zero tapes for early voting on many machines. What? You can’t what? Now, the report concludes that the statute requires accounting and chain of custody records, but they don’t exist in the entirety of early voting. Okay. Well, that’s a really big failure. Then the last problem is the math problem. The county records reportedly show 148,318 absentee ballots counted. Yet, again, this is going to be hard to do. I’m going to give you time so you can work out the math on this. You had only 125,785 voters. 148,000 votes cast, but only 125,000 people showed up to vote. So, what? That’s a pretty big gap. More than 22,000 ballots in a race that was decided by 11,779 votes. After multiple certifications, the counts didn’t match one another. Now, here’s where this becomes serious, way beyond politics. Philip Stark, he does stats. He’s from Berkeley, so I would say he’s probably not a conservative. He came in and he reviewed all of the aspects of the process. Here’s what he didn’t do: He didn’t say this is widespread fraud, but he did say there are real reasons to distrust the election outcome. He found machine counts and audit tallies disagreed substantially, even about the number of ballots that were cast. He wrote that some ballots, listen to this, appeared to be included at least twice in the original counts and multiple times in recounts. He warned that unreliable ballot marking devices could make recounts a little more than security theater. Those are his words: “security theater.” That’s a little devastating to the trust in the republic and our vote. Because here’s the truth: Republics don’t crash when one side loses. Republics collapse when half the country believes the referee is unreliable, and that’s what’s happening. We don’t believe the referee. This is why the position of Pam Bondi is so important and she seems to be doing a good job on this one because historically, in 1876, we just recovered from the Civil War and we almost lost the Union post-Civil War. Tammany Hall, New York, operated on ballot manipulation. Reformers came in and they forced structural transparency because it was all garbage, all of it, and everybody knew it. Nations in Latin America and Eastern Europe, why do they spiral out of control? Because their ballot was imperfect? No, they spiral out of control because the citizens lose faith and trust that ballots even mattered. The flame of liberty: To have a flame, you need oxygen. Confidence is the oxygen that brings the flame of liberty to life. Without it, everything suffocates. This is why the Fulton County thing matters so much. It’s not about proving somebody right or proving somebody wrong. It’s not about relitigating personalities. I mean, they actually said to Donald Trump, “What difference does it make? It’s not going to change the election.” No, it’s not. But we must know what happened so it doesn’t happen again. Are people this stupid? I think not. And then I go out and I talk to some people and I’m like, “Oh my gosh, they are this stupid.” This is about answering questions completely, transparently, and publicly. If the system is sound, it needs to be proven in daylight. If procedures failed, they have to be fixed openly. If records are missing, we need to know why they’re missing and then correct the structure or arrest the people so it can’t happen again. Because if Americans conclude that outcomes can shift without clear documentation, if chain of custody is just shrugged off as just paperwork, what difference does it matter? If audits contradict themselves and then we’re told, “Don’t dwell on that. It’s an audit,” what do you mean don’t dwell on that? Of course I dwell on that. I have to dwell on that. It’s an audit. You imagine going into the IRS and they audit you and they come back and they say, “Your numbers aren’t right.” And you’re like, “Don’t dwell on those numbers.” Of course, they’re going to dwell on that. It’s the numbers and math is math. And if you can’t fix those things, then elections stop being the peaceful transfer of power. And isn’t that what we’re all afraid of? Isn’t the left afraid of that? And isn’t the right afraid of that? That one time somebody’s not going to believe the election and they’re going to seize power? You want to stop that? Then you must have an accounting on what happened in Fulton County. Because if you don’t, it’s permanent suspicion. And once suspicion replaces consent, we’re no longer a self-governing republic. Our founders were so super smart. They did not design a system based on blind trust of officials or the government. They, in fact, developed a system that had checks and balances everywhere. And the last check and balance is in your First Amendment. I have a right to protest. I have a right to question the government. I have a right to demand answers from the government. It’s my right. It’s the first right. And on top of that, my religion can compel me to answer those questions. And I have a press that can ask those questions. The press is meant to question the government, not the people. All of it has to be a verifiable process. Paper trails, public counts, checks and balances. I wanted you to hear this from me because this report came out, a 250-page report from the Election Oversight Group, and I didn’t hear an awful lot and I don’t know if people understand why this is so important. If we don’t restore confidence one way or another, then every single future election is going to be fought. It will be fought not just at the ballot box, but in the mind of the citizens who no longer believe that the box is even secure or valid. And that is a far more dangerous place for a nation to be than anything we’re in right now. So if I hear one more person say, “What difference does it make? It’s not going to change the election,” here’s the difference. The question is whether Americans can trust how we decide. And if we can’t answer that clearly, convincingly, and with records that we can show one another, then the damage does not belong to the Republicans. The damage does not belong to the Democrats or the independents. It belongs to the republic itself.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has requested tech companies provide personal information, including names, email addresses, telephone numbers, and other identifying data, behind social media accounts that “track or criticize” Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), The New York Times reports. According to the outlet, DHS has sent hundreds of administrative subpoenas to Google, Reddit, Discord, and Meta for the information. The DHS is trying to identify Americans who oppose ICE raids by sending tech companies legal requests for the names, email addresses, telephone numbers and other identifying data behind social media accounts that track or criticise the agency. https://t.co/R7C34SBZB4 — Louisa Loveluck (@leloveluck) February 16, 2026 More from The New York Times: Google, Meta and Reddit complied with some of the requests, the government officials said. In the subpoenas, the department asked the companies for identifying details of accounts that do not have a real person’s name attached and that have criticized ICE or pointed to the locations of ICE agents. The New York Times saw two subpoenas that were sent to Meta over the last six months. The tech companies, which can choose whether or not to provide the information, have said they review government requests before complying. Some of the companies notified the people whom the government had requested data on and gave them 10 to 14 days to fight the subpoena in court. “The government is taking more liberties than they used to,” said Steve Loney, a senior supervising attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania. “It’s a whole other level of frequency and lack of accountability.” Over the last six months, Mr. Loney has represented people whose social media account information was sought by the Department of Homeland Security. The department said it had “broad administrative subpoena authority” but did not address questions about its requests. In court, its lawyers have argued that they are seeking information to help keep ICE agents in the field safe. “When we receive a subpoena, our review process is designed to protect user privacy while meeting our legal obligations,” a Google spokeswoman said in a statement, according to the outlet. “We inform users when their accounts have been subpoenaed, unless under legal order not to or in an exceptional circumstance. We review every legal demand and push back against those that are overbroad,” the statement continued. Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-NY), a former undocumented immigrant, said he would introduce legislation to prohibit the DHS from “maliciously” obtaining a user’s personal information. “DHS is using administrative subpoenas to obtain thousands of YOUR records from major companies. These subpoenas are signed by DHS staff—not a judge—and are being used to target immigrants, advocates, and journalists,” he said. DHS is using administrative subpoenas to obtain thousands of YOUR records from major companies. These subpoenas are signed by DHS staff—not a judge—and are being used to target immigrants, advocates, and journalists. @RonWyden and I are introducing legislation to ensure… pic.twitter.com/ZlksbtCgP5 — Adriano Espaillat (@RepEspaillat) February 17, 2026 TechCrunch noted: This echoes other recent reporting, with Bloomberg pointing to five cases in which Homeland Security sought to identify the owners of anonymous Instagram accounts, with the department withdrawing its subpoenas after the owners sued. And a Washington Post story described Homeland Security’s growing use of administrative subpoenas — which do not require the approval of a judge — to target Americans.

The Kansas Senate overrode a veto by Democrat Gov. Laura Kelly on a bill that prohibited biological men from using women’s bathrooms in government buildings. “Today the Kansas Senate restored sanity and overrode Laura Kelly’s dangerous veto of SB 244 that would have forced our mothers, sisters, wives, and daughters to share their bathrooms with biological men in government buildings,” Kansas Senate President Ty Masterson said. “Kansas Democrats are for They/Them. I will continue to fight for you, and protect women and girls across our state,” he added. Today the Kansas Senate restored sanity and overrode Laura Kelly’s dangerous veto of SB 244 that would have forced our mothers, sisters, wives, and daughters to share their bathrooms with biological men in government buildings. Kansas Democrats are for They/Them. I will continue… pic.twitter.com/NS8jMsmLDF — Ty Masterson (@TyMastersonKS) February 17, 2026 KSNT has more: Senators in the Kansas Statehouse voted 31-9 in favor of overriding Governor Laura Kelly’s veto of the controversial ‘bathroom bill’ on Feb. 17. Representatives in the House will next take up debate on the bill and determine whether the legislature defeats Kelly’s veto and the bill becomes law. “Although it was said that this is to bring clarity, having the definitions of male, female and gender be the same brings not clarity, but confusion,” said Senator Marci Francisco (D-Douglas County) prior to the Senate vote on SB 244 on Feb. 17. “There has been no evidence that having preferred identities on driver’s license[s] brings not clarity, but confusion.” Kelly vetoed House Substitute for Senate Bill 244 on Friday, Feb. 13. She condemned the legislation, calling it a “poorly drafted bill,” and sending it back to the legislature for further debate. “Last week, Governor Laura Kelly vetoed Senate Bill 244, commonsense legislation to protect the privacy, safety, and dignity of Kansas women and girls,” Kansas Family Voice commented. “This vote sends a strong message: Kansas families expect their elected officials to stand for privacy, fairness, and the rights of women and girls. It will now move over to the House,” it added. Last week, Governor Laura Kelly vetoed Senate Bill 244, commonsense legislation to protect the privacy, safety, and dignity of Kansas women and girls. Today, the Kansas Senate took decisive action. By a vote of 31 to 9, the Senate voted to override the Governor’s veto and… pic.twitter.com/B77PE6uKrZ — Kansas Family Voice (@KSFamilyVoice) February 17, 2026 In her veto, Kelly criticized the bill for having other “significant consequences” beyond prohibiting biological men from using women’s bathrooms. “Under this bill: if your grandfather is in a nursing home in a shared room, as a granddaughter, you would not be able to visit him,” Kelly said, according to The Kansas City Star. “If your wife is in a shared hospital room, as a husband, you would not be able to visit her,” she added. Kansas governor vetos anti-trans bill, says bathroom usage shouldn’t be policed https://t.co/ttdAXyBffC — The Kansas City Star (@KCStar) February 16, 2026 The Kansas City Star explained further: Republican supermajorities in the House and Senate adopted the measure late last month after employing a series of legislative maneuvers to expedite its passage without providing an opportunity for public feedback on key provisions, including the requirement that people use public restrooms and other private spaces in accordance with their sex assigned at birth. It’s the latest in a series of bills the Kansas Legislature has passed in recent years limiting the rights of transgender residents. Each has been enacted into law over Kelly’s veto. Last year, GOP lawmakers banned trans minors from receiving gender-affirming care and established harsh penalties for physicians caught providing it. In 2023, trans athletes were prohibited from competing in girls’ and women’s sports. Republicans framed the bathroom and driver’s license bill as an addendum clarifying the intent of a separate 2023 bill barring trans women from accessing female-only spaces. “I believe the Legislature should stay out of the business of telling Kansans how to go to the bathroom and instead stay focused on how to make life more affordable for Kansans,” Kelly said in her veto statement. Within minutes of her veto, House Speaker Dan Hawkins, a Wichita Republican, released his own statement saying, “Kansans expect their laws to reflect reality and protect privacy.” “It’s hard to wrap my mind around why the Governor would veto something so fundamentally common sense,” said Hawkins, who is running for state insurance commissioner. “SB 244 simply recognizes biological reality in state law and ensures that single-sex spaces, such as restrooms and locker rooms in public buildings, are designated accordingly.”

A Missouri court has ruled that Gov. Mike Kehoe had the constitutional authority to convene a special session that resulted in the passage of a new congressional map. During the special session, state lawmakers redrew Missouri’s congressional districts that will likely give Republicans one additional House seat. Republicans currently have a 6-2 advantage in the Show-Me State’s congressional delegation. The new congressional map is expected to give Republicans a 7-1 edge. Special session to redraw Missouri congressional districts was constitutional, judge rules https://t.co/zMxltSbn9C — St. Louis Post-Dispatch (@stltoday) February 17, 2026 KOMU 8 has more: The Missouri NAACP filed the lawsuit against state officials including Gov. Mike Kehoe in September 2025 in an attempt to stop the special session from happening, but the court did not take up the case in time to stop legislators from meeting for the session. The lawsuit alleged that while the Missouri Constitution allows the governor to call special sessions for extraordinary occasions, Kehoe’s reasoning to call the most recent session did not qualify as an extraordinary occasion. Judge Christopher Limbaugh disagreed, stating in the ruling issued Friday, that the governor has the constitutional discretion to decide what qualifies as an extraordinary occasion. Article 4, Section 9 of the Missouri Constitution, which describes the powers of the governor, states that on extraordinary occasions, the governor may convene the General Assembly by proclamation and state matters for the legislature to take action on. Kehoe called Missouri lawmakers to a special session on Aug. 29, 2025, directing them to focus the session on redistricting the state and changing the initiative petition process. The lawsuit filed by the Missouri NAACP is one of numerous legal battles in the state regarding redistricting. Kansas City Mayor Quinton Lucas is scheduled to testify this week over a lawsuit alleging the new congressional map violates the Missouri Constitution. The Kansas City Star explained: Lucas, who has opposed the map since lawmakers approved it last fall, will likely testify on Wednesday, according to a copy of the mayor’s calendar. In a statement to The Star, the mayor’s spokesperson said he will address the map’s impact on Kansas City voters. “Kansas City stands to lose critical representation in Washington due to redistricting efforts that dilute our city’s voice and political power,” said spokesperson Megan Strickland. “Mayor Lucas will address concerns about how these changes threaten Kansas City residents’ ability to elect representatives who understand and advocate for our community.” This week’s trial is part of an onslaught of legal battles that could have seismic ramifications for Kansas City’s congressional representation. It centers on a lawsuit alleging that Missouri’s new map, which carves Democratic-leaning Kansas City into three GOP-friendly districts, violates the Missouri Constitution on several fronts. The suit was filed by the ACLU of Missouri and the Campaign Legal Center on behalf of four Jackson County voters who were sliced out of Kansas City’s 5th Congressional District. The lawsuit also alleges the map includes a crucial error that puts the same voters in two different districts.

One of the greatest mysteries over the last 10+ years is that George H.W. Bush funeral and the mysterious envelopes that were passed out during it. You remember that, right? Everyone who received an envelope either turned white in pale shock or looked pissed. Full report here if you want to refresh your memory: FLASHBACK: What Was In Those Bush Sr. Funeral Envelopes? The “First Arrest” To Shock The World Revealed? But to this day we still don’t know for sure what was in those envelopes. And now a new theory has emerged from Liz Crokin. I’m not saying I am fully convinced, but it’s certainly interesting. Take a look: George W. Bush did not receive an envelope at his father’s funeral and his family members who did looked at him in disgust as if he betrayed them. Perhaps he was working against them for many years; it’s certainly something to think about. For those of you who don’t know what… https://t.co/BF3AkfQleR pic.twitter.com/72LLOlOytg — LIZ CROKIN (@LizCrokin) February 17, 2026 George W. Bush did not receive an envelope at his father’s funeral and his family members who did looked at him in disgust as if he betrayed them. Perhaps he was working against them for many years; it’s certainly something to think about. For those of you who don’t know what I’m talking about, see my below tweet. You can watch the moment again right here: At George H. W. Bush’s funeral on Dec. 5, 2018, multiple members of the elite cabal received a message in an envelope. Their reaction to what was written in those envelopes were captured on live TV. Some remained cool, others feigned shock. The fact that the entire media —… pic.twitter.com/5TTl7OZCa3 — LIZ CROKIN (@LizCrokin) July 22, 2023 What has always stood out to me the most about this whole thing is that the camera man (or lady!) was perfectly prepared to capture each and every reaction. The camera didn’t miss a single one. That tells me the level of planning to pull this off was absolutely off the charts. Executed and delivered with extreme precision. And still to this day kept entirely confidential. Maybe Liz is right? I’ve written about it a lot over the years: FLASHBACK: What Was In Those Bush Sr. Funeral Envelopes? The “First Arrest” To Shock The World Revealed? EDITOR’S NOTE: Perhaps the biggest unsolved mystery over the last 10 years has been what happened at the Bush Sr. funeral and what exactly was in those mystery envelopes that were passed out to so many Presidents and First Ladies?  Now that we’re back in the same room for the Jimmy Carter funeral, it seemed like the right time to re-examine this.  Please enjoy this walk down memory lane, and perhaps we will have our answer soon…. I’m digging into this story again because I believe we are VERY close… And I want this to be fresh in your mind when it all goes down. Do you remember those envelopes that were passed out at the Bush Sr. funeral? I want to go back and look at those again because I have a hunch they are about to become VERY relevant… Remember how Q said “the first arrest will shock the world”? [more on that below — I’ll give you my opinion which has been confirmed by a few of my intel sources at the bottom of this article] Do you remember how these really weird envelopes were passed out at the funeral and only certain Deep State cabal members got one? And each person to a man (here’s looking at you Michael) nearly turned white after they opened them? And then quickly stuffed them back in the envelope? Remember that? Well, the video has been almost completely scrubbed from YouTube and Twitter, but I found and saved some copies on Rumble. Watch: Analysis by Lin Wood:   Here is the raw footage: https://rumble.com/embed/v9nzdr/?pub=lzerp Far left Right Wing Watch explained a theory from Dr. Dave Janda: Right-wing conspiracy theorist and radio host Dave Janda appeared on Greg Hunter’s “USA Watchdog” program last week, where he declared that the nomination of William Barr to the position of attorney general is confirmation that former president George W. Bush has “flipped” and is now working with President Trump to take down the “deep state” in exchange for protection for his family. While promoting the right-wing conspiracy theory that the Obamas, Clintons, and various other high-ranking officials who attended the funeral of former president George H.W. Bush last month received mysterious envelopes hidden in their programs, allegedly informing them that they are under indictment, Janda asserted that George W. Bush met at the White House with Trump the day before the service to cut a deal to reveal what he knows about the deep state’s involvement in everything from human trafficking to drug running. “From what I understand, George W. had come to a point in his life where he said, ‘Look, I can’t be involved in this stuff,’” Janda said. “I believe he reached out to President Trump and could well have said, ‘Look, I will give you information on everything [in exchange for protection for my family].’” Janda said the fact that Trump nominated Barr the day following the funeral was “confirmation” that this deal had been struck. “I think that part of the deal that was constructed with ‘W’ was, ‘Look, you hand over all this information and we go after all these folks … But to assure you that we’re good on our side of the deal, we will put in William Barr, who was the attorney general under your father for a period of time,’” Janda said. “Barr, I think, ultimately, what he’ll do is he will push the Bush family to the side, as far as prosecutions, and I believe he’ll focus more on the other side of the ledger, that being the Clintons, the Obamas, and a lot of these other players.” Here’s the theory from GreysEconomy: In the latest drop we get a possible reason why Vice President Mike Pence and his wife Karen received an envelope at George Bush’s funeral last year and why Lt. Gen Michael Flynn was set up by the FBI. The link to a Sara Carter story shows additional texts between disgraced ex-FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok and his lover ex-FBI Attorney Lisa Page attempting to develope and inside the White House spy during the Trump transition team after the 2016 election. In quite an extensive article Cater lays out what Strzok and Page had in mind. Pence’s chief of staff in the early days of the Trump Administration was Josh Pitcock. Pitcock was married to Katherine Seaman. Seaman worked for the FBI and prior to the election worked with Strzok and Page on the Hillary Clinton email probe. This is why the call it the swamp. The connections are so rife with married couples seldom taking the same name in order to obfuscate the connections. As you can see above Karen Pence like all the other wives at the Bush funeral received a note inside their programs. Also note behind Pence and to his left a Secret Service agent is monitoring his reaction while the Veep sits directly behind the President. What the notes contained has never been divulged the reactions by the recipients was not joyous, in fact horror and/or dread was seen on many of the faces after reading the notes. (Please read this post to get the full story.) My high-octane speculation is that Trump’s intelligence team discovered that Pence knew about Pitcock’s activities of spying on the newly elected president and Pence may have also agreed to help Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein with his case of Trump being unfit to serve making Pence president under the 25th Amendment. I believe Lt. Gen Flynn, Trump’s original NSA Director, has all the details on Pence, Pitcock and Seaman but had his legs cut out from under him by the FBI when Strzok and another agent interviewed him without a lawyer about speaking to foreign officials during the transition. The FBI had tapes of Flynn on a phone call with the then-Russian Foreign Minister and when Flynn could not recall the exact details of the call the FBI charged him with lying. This was to disgrace Flynn and keep the Pence spying information a secret. But it did not work. Stay tuned. This is a blockbuster. So why did Pence get one? That’s the big question. And Michelle: More: More: https://rumble.com/embed/vb0e3z/?pub=lzerp More: https://rumble.com/embed/vb3vxf/?pub=lzerp More: Ok, now back to Q. Here is the original Q Post 3716 about the first arrest to wake up the world: Let’s look at this logically for a second… People already hate Obama and Hillary. Would their arrest “shock the world”? Or in the actual phrasing of the post would their arrest “trigger a mass pop awakening”? No, I doubt it. Same for all the other list of characters that are often suspected of fulfilling this warning:  Soros, Gates, Fauci. They’re already hated by many. So who would truly trigger mass shock and awakening? I think the Pope would a good candidate and shouldn’t be ruled out. But that’s not what my intel sources are telling me. What I suspect, and what has been given the wink and the nod from my sources, AND what lines up with those videos below is none of than George W. Bush. For what you ask? 9/11/01. Goofy old GWB… The “lovable loser”. The dope who could never get his words right could trigger a “nucular” awakening. The Republicans already suspect the Democrats of selling out America, but so many Republicans are still asleep, still thinking the problems in our world are R vs. D. They’re not. The problems at Nationalists vs. Globalists…..Christians vs. Luciferians….people who LOVE America vs. people who say things like Jeremiah Wright said about America (which I will not reprint here). So what do you think? Will this be the even that marks the great awakening? Is it coming soon? Is that what was in those envelopes?