As California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s presidential bid comes closer to reality, it turns out he might not be his worst enemy after all. The more his wife, Jennifer, gets in front of the cameras to spout her thoughts on a range of topics, the more voters are being turned off to the Newsom name in general. In a recent interview, she went off on a tangent that prompted a thorough rebuke from Megyn Kelly. According to the New York Post: “We’ve got to start with this nutcase, Jennifer Siebel Newsom… what’s going on?” Kelly said on Wednesday’s episode of SiriusXM’s “The Megyn Kelly Show.” The conservative commentator seized on comments Siebel Newsom made in a past interview about a childhood tragedy. “She casually references the fact that she accidentally killed her sister… which I don’t think most people knew,” Kelly said. Kelly described the moment as jarring, saying: “Everything about that was a record scratch.” The former Fox News host was reacting to Siebel Newsom’s comments in a 2015 documentary in which she discussed her work interviewing incarcerated youth. “I told them about my own loss,” Siebel Newsom said in the film “The Mask You Live In.” “I lost my elder sister a few days before my seventh birthday, and I blame myself for her death.” Siebel Newsom drew a parallel between her experience and that of incarcerated juveniles, saying: “And I share that because they ultimately were accused of committing these violent crimes and sentenced for life.” The remarks also attracted attention on social media: Holy shit. Gavin Newsom’s Wife Jennifer ran over and killed her own sister with a golf cart…then tells San Quentin Prisoners for Life, “Yours were probably accidents too…” What TF is wrong with her? pic.twitter.com/rbOk6gcYMu — Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) April 7, 2026 Jennifer Newsom recounts telling some San Quentin prisoners how she, as a 6-year-old, ran over and killed her 8-year-old sister. Jennifer says it was an accident, like how with those prisoners “theirs was probably an accident too.” What weirdo says that?pic.twitter.com/Gxw7SiIlYk — Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) April 7, 2026 HORRIFICALLY SAD REMINDERS: Not only did Gavin Newsom’s wife sleep with Harvey Weinstein for years, in exchange for bad help in Hollywood, but Jennifer Seibel Newsom also killed her 8 yr-old sister when she was “playing” in a golf cart & backed over her. “The sisters were… https://t.co/ZdW46A7OJx — Voice of Sanity (@HouseofElon) April 7, 2026 The National Enquirer also reported on Newsom’s remarks and Kelly’s response: Siebel Newsom also explained of speaking with the young men in the clip, “I think it shocked them that this, you know, blonde lady who was interviewing them had a similar story — was perhaps in the wrong place at the wrong time — but wasn’t punished the way they were because clearly it was an accident, but theirs was probably an accident, too.” According to The Representation Project, the film “follows boys and young men as they struggle to stay true to themselves while negotiating America’s narrow definition of masculinity.” Kelly referred to the remark as a “record scratch,” noting that the death of Siebel Newsom’s sister — which she previously revealed to The Los Angeles Times was during a golf carting accident — was the “parents’ fault for letting six-year-olds be at the wheel of golf carts.” Here’s a clip of Kelly’s remarks: “It tells you a lot about how the libs see the world…”@dsonoiki and @stepfanie on Jennifer Newsom's insane comments about accidentally killing her sister, and why women should run the world. Watch and download: https://t.co/FjIiAjfcyc pic.twitter.com/G1GlKvdY5l — The Megyn Kelly Show (@MegynKellyShow) April 8, 2026 How do you feel about it?

Election integrity??? What if I told you that a slew of Democrats just came out AGAINST election integrity as it was recently put forward by President Trump? But then imagine I told you that a slew of Democrats came out IN FAVOR of election integrity. Which one is more believable?  Which one would you immediately assume couldn’t POSSIBLY be true? Can BOTH be true?  (This is American politics we’re talking about, after all.) It turns out even Congressional Democrats will agree that election integrity is a good thing — until they don’t. Here’s the story: Not only did that ‘slew of Democrats’ just come out verbally attacking President Trump’s recent actions designed to ensure US election integrity. But they are officially calling on the Postmaster General of the US Postal Service to ignore the President of the United States, and actively work AGAINST his push for secure elections! Every Democrat that makes up the NJ Congressional delegation put their signature on a letter to the Postmaster General, pushing to that end. That letter was in direct opposition to this executive order, signed by President Trump just over a week ago: "We want to have honest voting in our country because if you don't have honest voting, you can't have really a nation." President Donald J. Trump signs an executive order combating several election integrity issues, including inaccurate voter rolls and vote-by-mail fraud. pic.twitter.com/fax2dnXHwj — The White House (@WhiteHouse) March 31, 2026 The signing of that order essentially makes absolutely sure that only US citizens vote in US elections. It mandates cross-referencing voter rolls and makes prosecuting election fraud a much bigger priority. But here’s where the Democrats (and multiple blue states which are now bringing lawsuits, which we’ll get to shortly…) are really losing their minds, because they think they’ll get a legal win here. Probably because so many rogue judges have been willing to do so! What the President did will lock down the truly necessary (think members of the military, etc) mail-in/absentee ballots by creating a system of standards and tracking protocols for the US Postal Service. In other words, NO MORE MAIL-IN / ABSENTEE VOTER FRAUD! Before we get into the letter from the Democrats calling on USPS to revolt, here’s the full Executive Order for anyone who wants to dive in — as found on the White House website: By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 20901 et seq.), the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20501 et seq.), and the Federal Government’s constitutional obligation to guarantee a republican form of Government to every State in the Union, U.S. Const. Art. IV, Sec. 4, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose and Policy. The right to vote in Federal elections is reserved exclusively for citizens of the United States under the Constitution and Federal law. Federal statutes explicitly prohibit non-citizens from registering to vote or voting in Federal elections and impose criminal penalties for violations. (18 U.S.C. 241; 18 U.S.C. 611; 18 U.S.C. 1015; and 52 U.S.C. 20511). The Social Security Administration (SSA) maintains records that, in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program under 42 U.S.C. 1320b-7, can assist in verifying identity and Federal election voter eligibility. The Federal Government has an unavoidable duty under Article II of the Constitution of the United States to enforce Federal law, which includes preventing violations of Federal criminal law and maintaining public confidence in election outcomes. To enhance election integrity via the United States Mail, additional measures are necessary. Secure ballot envelope identifiers provide a reliable, auditable mechanism to enforce Federal law without unduly burdening or infringing on the rights of eligible voters. Unique ballot envelope identifiers, such as bar codes, enable confirmation that only citizens receive and cast ballots, reducing the risk of fraud and protecting the integrity of Federal elections. Sec. 2. Establishment and Transmission of State Citizenship Lists and Prioritization of Investigations and Prosecutions Related to Election Fraud. (a) To the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law, including but not limited to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and in coordination with the Commissioner of SSA, shall take appropriate action to compile and transmit to the chief election official of each State a list of individuals confirmed to be United States citizens who will be above the age of 18 at the time of an upcoming Federal election and who maintain a residence in the subject State (State Citizenship List). The State Citizenship List shall be derived from Federal citizenship and naturalization records, SSA records, SAVE data, and other relevant Federal databases. The State Citizenship List shall be updated and transmitted to State election officials no fewer than 60 days before each regularly scheduled Federal election, or promptly upon request by a State in connection with any special Federal election. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish procedures to (i) allow individuals to access their individual records as well as to update or correct them in advance of elections; and (ii) enable States to routinely supplement and provide suggested modifications or amendments to the State Citizenship List transmitted thereto. An individual’s identification on the State Citizenship List does not indicate that the individual has been properly registered to vote in the State. State and Federal laws and State procedures must still be followed for an individual to be registered to vote. There may be State laws, not reflected in the State Citizenship List, that preclude voter registration, or the individual may choose not to be registered. (b) For purposes of this order, an individual is “eligible to vote in a Federal election” if the individual is a citizen of the United States, 18 years of age or older by the date of the upcoming election, and otherwise qualified under the laws of his or her State. The Attorney General shall prioritize the investigation and, as appropriate, the prosecution of State and local officials or any others involved in the administration of Federal elections who issue Federal ballots to individuals not eligible to vote in a Federal election, including under 18 U.S.C. 2(a), 18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 371, 18 U.S.C. 611(a), 18 U.S.C. 1001, 18 U.S.C. 1015, 52 U.S.C. 10307, and 52 U.S.C. 20511. Similarly, the Attorney General shall prioritize the investigation and, as appropriate, the prosecution of individuals and public or private entities engaged in, or aiding and abetting, the printing, production, shipment, or distribution of ballots to individuals who are not eligible to vote in a Federal election. Sec. 3. United States Postal Service Rulemaking on Mail-In and Absentee Ballots. (a) The unlawful use of the mail in connection with elections is prohibited by various Federal statutes, including 18 U.S.C. 1341, 18 U.S.C. 1708, 52 U.S.C. 10307, and 52 U.S.C. 20511. (b) To ensure the faithful execution of Federal law, protect the integrity of the mail as a medium for transmitting Federal election ballots and establish uniform standards for mail-in or absentee ballot services implemented through the United States Postal Service (USPS), the Postmaster General is hereby directed to initiate a proposed rulemaking pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 401 and other applicable authority within 60 days of the date of this order. The notice of proposed rulemaking shall include, at minimum, the following: (i) Proposed provisions specifying that all outbound ballot mail must be mailed in an envelope that: (A) is marked as Official Election Mail, including through designated markings provided by USPS for this purpose, such as the Official Election Mail logo, as necessary and appropriate; (B) is automation-compatible and bears a unique Intelligent Mail barcode, or successor USPS technology, that facilitates tracking and is consistent with the other requirements of this section; and (C) has undergone a mail envelope design review by the USPS to ensure compliance with USPS mailing standards, including barcode placement. (ii) Proposed provisions specifying that, no fewer than 90 days prior to a Federal election, any State may choose to notify the USPS if it intends to allow for mail-in or absentee ballots to be transmitted by the USPS. As part of that notification, any notifying State should further indicate whether it intends to submit to the USPS, no fewer than 60 days before the election, a list of voters eligible to vote in a Federal election in such State to whom the State intends to provide a mail-in or absentee ballot to be transmitted via the USPS. (iii) Proposed provisions specifying that the USPS shall not transmit mail-in or absentee ballots from any individual unless those individuals have been enrolled on a State-specific list described in subsection (b)(iv) of this section with the USPS pursuant to this subsection. (iv) Proposed provisions specifying that the USPS shall provide each State with a list of individuals (Mail-In and Absentee Participation List) who are enrolled with the USPS, pursuant to a process specified in the rulemaking directed by this subsection, for mail-in or absentee ballots provided by such State, along with unique ballot envelope identifiers, such as bar codes, for mail-in or absentee ballots provided to such individuals. The preparation and transmission of each State-specific Mail-In and Absentee Participation List shall comply with the Privacy Act and all applicable use agreements. (v) Proposed procedures enabling each State to routinely supplement and provide suggested modifications or amendments to the State’s Mail-In and Absentee Participation List in advance of any Federal election, consistent with applicable State law. (c) The USPS shall coordinate with the USPS Office of Inspector General and the Department of Justice for investigation of suspected unlawful use of the mail involving Federal election materials. (d) Any final rule pursuant to this section shall be issued no later than 120 days from the date of this order. Sec. 4. Implementation. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of SSA, and the Postmaster General shall coordinate with the Secretary of Commerce in effectuating all relevant aspects of the implementation of this order. (b) The Attorney General shall enforce compliance with the applicable Federal statutes referenced herein and provide guidance to election officials, including any instrumentalities thereof; contractors; individuals involved in the administration of Federal elections; or public or private entities engaged in the printing, production, shipment, or distribution of ballots. (c) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, within 90 days of the date of this order, establish the infrastructure necessary to compile, maintain, and transmit the State Citizenship List described in section 2(a) of this order, and shall designate a point of contact within DHS to receive and process requests from individuals and State election officials regarding the relevant State Citizenship List. The Commissioner of SSA shall provide all necessary citizenship and identity data to the Secretary of Homeland Security in support of this requirement, consistent with applicable law, the Privacy Act, and all applicable use agreements. Sec. 5. Enforcement. The Attorney General and the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) with relevant authority shall take all lawful steps to deter and address noncompliance with Federal law, including withholding Federal funds from noncompliant States and localities where such withholding is authorized by law. Evidence of violations of existing Federal laws by State or local election officials; States or localities, including any instrumentalities thereof; contractors; individuals involved in the administration of Federal elections; or public or private entities engaged in the printing, production, shipment, or distribution of ballots may be referred to the Department of Justice for consideration of investigation or charges under 18 U.S.C. 2(a), 18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 371, 18 U.S.C. 611(a), 18 U.S.C. 1001, 18 U.S.C. 1015, 52 U.S.C. 10307, and 52 U.S.C. 20511. States and localities should preserve, for a 5-year period, all records and materials — excluding ballots cast — evidencing voter participation in any Federal election (e.g., ballot envelopes, regardless of carrier). Sec. 6. Severability. If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any agency, person, or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other agencies, persons, or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, March 31, 2026. And before I forget, I want to explain my opening “what if I told you” statements. Are Democrats FOR or AGAINST election integrity? Apparently, that depends what day of the week it is — and whether or not you mean REAL election integrity. Check out these quotes from less than two weeks ago, highlighting Democrats AGREEING with basic election integrity… only to vote against it: Republican and Democrat voters across America want voter ID. Supposedly, these Senate Democrats did too, until they voted against it. pic.twitter.com/1k0SMbElyy — Senate Republicans (@SenateGOP) April 8, 2026 Admittedly, Gallego from Arizona and Warnock from Georgia weren’t directly part of this letter sent by NJ Congressmen to the USPS. But it just goes to show you how easy it is to LIE for the CAMERA, and then vote pro-corruption in order to retain power. Our slew of NJ Democrats didn’t just vote against election integrity legislation backed by President Trump — now they’re openly telling the head of a federal entity to go against President Trump’s executive order. Here’s the full text of that letter, as shared on the US House website: Dear Postmaster General Steiner We write to condemn the Administration’s unlawful executive order seeking to seize states’ constitutional authority over its elections. The Constitution is very clear: authority over the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections” belongs to the states, with Congress—not the President—as the only federal check. Any effort by the executive branch to dictate or interfere with election administration through federal agencies is not only unlawful, but violates the fundamental principle of separation of powers. Against this backdrop, any effort to involve the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) in carrying out this executive order—especially in ways that affect the handling, timing, or treatment of election mail—must be rejected. In New Jersey, election officials have shown that our systems, including vote-by-mail, can be both secure and accessible to eligible voters. For decades, our state has put in place strong safeguards to protect election integrity. Mail-in ballots, for example, must meet strict labeling requirements, including clear markings such as “Official Mail-In Ballot” and “It is against the law for anyone except you, the voter, to mark or inspect this ballot.” Voters must also verify their identity and sign their ballot under penalty of perjury or face potential criminal charges. Every county is required to provide secure ballot drop boxes equipped with security cameras to protect ballots. State law also sets clear timelines and rules for the delivery, receipt, and counting of ballots. And voters can track their ballots and confirm that they were received. In addition to state law, New Jersey launched its Voter Protection Initiative in 2022—a multi-agency effort to safeguard election integrity. The program “monitors and investigates election fraud and other criminal violations and directs reports of interference to local and federal law enforcement as needed” among other things. Together, these protections have produced secure elections, high participation, orderly administration, and strong public confidence. They also reflect the constitutional authority of states to set the time, place, and manner of elections. To be clear—USPS itself has recognized the limits of its authority in its recent rulemaking, specifically stating: “Postal Service does not administer elections, establish the rules or deadlines that govern elections, or determine whether or how election jurisdictions utilize the mail or incorporate our postmark into their rules. The Postal Service also does not advocate for or against any particular voting practices (including mailin qvoting). Instead, the Postal Service collects, processes, transports, and delivers mail and packages that are mailable under federal law. As part of that role, we deliver the nation’s Election Mail when public policy makers and election officials choose to use the mail as a part of their election system and when citizens choose to utilize our services to participate in an election.” This official position from USPS clearly defines its role and legal obligations. USPS is a neutral carrier of election mail—not an election authority. It cannot assume powers reserved to the states or change its operations in ways that interfere with state election laws or voter access. The dangers of federal overreach regarding elections—both in New Jersey and across the country—are not just theoretical. They are immediate and real. Any federal action, whether through directive, pressure, or operational change, that disrupts these systems would be unlawful and could disenfranchise voters who rely on the mail to cast their ballots. Seniors, military voters, working families, and people with disabilities would be hit hardest by any decline in the reliability or neutrality of election mail. USPS cannot be used to carry out an unconstitutional executive order. Doing so would be a direct attack on states’ constitutional authority over our elections. Accordingly, we demand that USPS: 1. Refuse to implement any provision of Trump’s executive order that interferes with state election laws or the established handling of election mail; 2. Publicly reaffirm the Postal Service’s commitment to neutrality and to following state election laws; 3. Coordinate closely with state and local election officials—including those in New Jersey —to ensure the timely, secure, and accurate delivery of all election mail consistent with state law; and 4. Provide Congress with a full and transparent accounting of any communications, guidance, or operational changes considered in response to this executive order. At a time when our democratic institutions are under great strain, the rule of law must prevail over political partisanship. The Constitution does not allow the executive branch to seize control of state-run elections, nor does not permit federal agencies to carry out that dangerous overreach.10 USPS must remain what the law requires it to be: a neutral, reliable carrier for the people’s voice—not a tool to suppress it. Not to be left out, Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (Dem – Illinois) jumped on the bandwagon and sent the Postmaster General a letter of his own, basically telling him the same thing as the NJ crew — ignore Trump: I’m demanding answers from USPS after Trump’s executive order threatened access to absentee and mail ballots ahead of the 2026 midterms. USPS must remain a neutral carrier of election mail — not a gatekeeper deciding who gets to vote. Read my letter: https://t.co/lI7mgudslL pic.twitter.com/rrbm3vX7ES — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (@CongressmanRaja) April 9, 2026 Would you believe me if I told you the now embattled notorious Trump-hater Letitia James is attacking the President at exactly the same point as the other Democrats? Could it be that President Trump has struck a nerve by stopping the election fraud happening under the auspices of the USPS? Could it be… that the fraudsters are scared? James dropped this post, highlighting those “free, fair, and secure elections” the Democrats like to pretend exist, pretending that President Trump’s actions are somehow dangerous to election integrity: Our elections are and always have been free, fair, and secure. We won't allow this administration to attack the very foundation of our nation.https://t.co/AVp6VJKpvp — NY AG James (@NewYorkStateAG) April 7, 2026 And that brings me to the other leg of this story. While our NJ ‘slew’ of Democrats are calling on the USPS to revolt… Dozens of ‘blue’ states are going to court, desperate to get President Trump’s AUTHENTIC ‘free, fair, and secure’ election integrity demolished and destroyed before the midterms. That lawsuit was presented just over a week ago, as reported on Friday by Reuters: A coalition of Democratic state attorneys general filed a lawsuit on Friday challenging U.S. President Donald Trump’s new executive order tightening rules ​on mail‑in voting. The lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Boston, added to the ‌rising number of legal challenges taking aim at the order Trump signed on Tuesday, with cases also being pursued by arms of the Democratic Party and voting rights advocates. The case was filed by attorneys general in 22 ​states and the District of Columbia and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson in a statement responded: “Only Democrat politicians ​and operatives would be upset about lawful efforts to secure American elections and ensure only eligible American citizens are casting ballots.” His [President Trump] executive order directs his administration to compile a list of ‌confirmed U.S. ⁠citizens eligible to vote in each state and to use federal data to help state election officials verify who is eligible to vote. It also requires the U.S. Postal Service to only deliver ballots to voters on each state’s approved mail-in ballot list. States must also preserve ​election-related records for five ​years. They said allowing Trump’s order to ​stand would force ⁠states to rush to overhaul their election systems before November, causing chaos and likely disenfranchising eligible voters. Imagine that. Cross-referencing voter rolls? Only delivering ballots to verified voters? And STOPPING the ‘late ballots’ that come flooding in after deadlines, which have suddenly (against mathematic possibility) swung the outcome of elections wildly in the wee hours of the morning, after those deadlines had passed? Imagine… the thought of stopping that being a BAD thing. Even worse — imagine the REALITY that we’ve been doing elections without any of those safeguards for decades! I want to drop in one more video clip to round this out, just to bring back to remembrance what’s at stake. And point out exactly why the Democrats are going all-in on this attack. Check out this video shared from Laura Loomer yesterday via X, focusing on the fact that illegal aliens are routinely handling mail-in-ballots: Midterm Election Integrity Update Did you know illegal aliens are being employed by the USPS and could be handling your mail-in-ballots in 6 months? As midterms loom, the media and political establishment are suspiciously silent about one of the Biden administration’s… pic.twitter.com/QwT8UQ32UR — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) April 8, 2026 Here’s a full screen version of that clip for convenience, and I’ll drop the full text of her post below as well:

President Trump has had it with the Panicans! Unless you’ve been living under a rock these past few months, you know by now that a feud has been escalating between President Trump and certain podcasters trying to sow division in MAGA. Granted, some of these guys still put out some good journalism — but, at the same time, they have also been churning out some pretty lame, and frankly, ignorant, attacks on President Trump. The fall of some of these reporters has been sad to see. Take Alex Jones, for instance: SAD: Alex Jones Crashes Out, Viciously Turns On Trump Or, Tucker Carlson: President Trump Responds To Tucker Carlson’s Latest Attacks: “He’s Low IQ”   Today, President Trump made it very clear that he is done with the lot… In an absolutely scathing post on Truth Social, President Trump called out Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones by name. And, he did not hold back, at all! President Trump blasted these “pundits” for having low IQs and took some rather personal hits at each of them. Read this for yourself: Full text: I know why Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens, and Alex Jones have all been fighting me for years, especially by the fact that they think it is wonderful for Iran, the Number One State Sponsor of Terror, to have a Nuclear Weapon — Because they have one thing in common, Low IQs. They’re stupid people, they know it, their families know it, and everyone else knows it, too! Look at their past, look at their record. They don’t have what it takes, and they never did! They’ve all been thrown off Television, lost their Shows, and aren’t even invited on TV because nobody cares about them, they’re NUT JOBS, TROUBLEMAKERS, and will say anything necessary for some “free” and cheap publicity. Now they think they get some “clicks” because they have Third Rate Podcasts, but nobody’s talking about them, and their views are the opposite of MAGA — Or I wouldn’t have won the Presidential Election in a LANDSLIDE. MAGA agrees with me, and just gave CNN a 100% Approval Rating of “TRUMP,” not Hand Flailing Fools like Tucker Carlson, who couldn’t even finish College, he was a broken man when he got fired from Fox, and he’s never been the same — Perhaps he should see a good psychiatrist! Or Megyn Kelly, who nastily asked me the now famous, “Only Rosie O’Donnell,” question, or “Crazy” Candace Owens, who accuses the Highly Respected First Lady of France of being a man, when she is not, and will hopefully win lots of money in the ongoing lawsuit. Actually, to me, the First Lady of France is a far more beautiful woman than Candace, in fact, it’s not even close! Or Bankrupt Alex Jones, who says some of the dumbest things, and lost his entire fortune, as he should have, for his horrendous attack on the families of the Sandy Hook shooting victims, ridiculously claiming it was a hoax. These so-called “pundits” are LOSERS, and they always will be! Now Fake News CNN, The Failing New York Times, and all of the other Radical Left “News” Organizations, are “hailing” them, and giving them “positive” press for the first time in their lives. They’re not “MAGA,” they’re losers, just trying to latch on to MAGA. As President, I could get them on my side anytime I want to, but when they call, I don’t return their calls because I’m too busy on World and Country Affairs and, after a few times, they go “nasty,” just like Marjorie “Traitor” Brown, but I no longer care about that stuff, I only care about doing right for our Country. MAGA is about WINNING and STRENGTH in not allowing Iran to have Nuclear Weapons. MAGA is about MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, and these people have no idea how to do that, BUT I DO, because THE UNITED STATES IS NOW THE “HOTTEST” COUNTRY ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD! President DONALD J. TRUMP Ouch. These are some pretty brutal insults. Now, I have to say, unlike President Trump, I’m not totally convinced that the First Lady of France is a lady, for certain… But to say she’s “far more beautiful” than Candace Owens? That’s got to be one of the harshest insults he’s ever said — and President Trump is no stranger to mean tweets! What do you think? Do you agree with President Trump’s assessment of these podcasters? What’s your take?

Amid the nationwide crackdown on fraud led by Vice President JD Vance, five people have just been arrested over alleged hospice fraud in Southern California. Last night, sweeping raids took place at ten locations suspected of facilitating hundreds of millions of dollars in hospice fraud. This scheme alone stole a whopping $267 million from American taxpayers — and, it’s just the tip of the iceberg! In total, the California DOJ has filed charges against 21 individuals related to the quarter-of-a-billion-dollar ploy  — and five have been taken into custody, so far. CBS News reported further: The California Department of Justice and several state agencies arrested five people Wednesday in a crackdown on an alleged hospice fraud ring, and officials said more arrests will come. Several suspects received “notices to appear” in court and will face arrest warrants if they don’t show. In total, the state filed charges against 21 suspects. State Attorney General Rob Bonta said the scheme defrauded California of $267 million through bogus charges to Medi-Cal, the state-administered Medicaid program. Americans pay into Medicare through taxes and premiums, so defrauding it would be essentially stealing from all American taxpayers. “What will address fraud is us doing the hard work — heads down, sleeves rolled up, doing the investigation, doing the arrests, doing the prosecutions, holding folks accountable,” Bonta told CBS News. Bonta said the defendants collected money without providing a single legitimate hospice service. The law enforcement effort, called Operation Skip Trace, targeted ten locations in Southern California. California AG Rob Bonta announced the arrests during a press conference this afternoon. Watch what he had to say here: BREAKING: California AG Rob Bonta announces a major hospice fraud "bust" in Los Angeles County, alleging that the scheme defrauded Medi-Cal of $267 million. "So, just to be clear, a quarter billion dollars…funds that are paid for by Californian taxpayers, funds that are meant… pic.twitter.com/Gc3SwMigr9 — Fox News (@FoxNews) April 9, 2026 BREAKING: California AG Rob Bonta announces a major hospice fraud “bust” in Los Angeles County, alleging that the scheme defrauded Medi-Cal of $267 million. “So, just to be clear, a quarter billion dollars…funds that are paid for by Californian taxpayers, funds that are meant to provide care to Californians in need.” “It is unacceptable. It is illegal, and we will not stand for it.” Fox News has more details on how the scheme operated: “This criminal scheme, this criminal operation, was no accident,” Bonta told reporters at a news conference to announce the arrests. “It wasn’t a case of billing errors, cutting corners, or up-charging care. This was a brazen, calculated criminal scheme that exploited the Medi-Cal system, stole from the State of California and Medicaid, and prevented services and care from going to sick individuals who actually need it.” The probe began with a tip from the state Department of Health Care Services alleging hospice fraud at 14 companies. Bonta’s office investigated the companies and eight people suspected of money laundering. Investigators found that those involved purchased personal identifying information for people living outside of California on the dark web, then enrolled them in Covered California by posing as California residents. “Straw owners” then bought a number of hospice companies and began billing Medi-Cal for services never provided to those stolen identities. The suspects used fake records, nonexistent offices, and fraudulent diagnoses to justify these claims, Bonta said. “Meanwhile, the so-called patients were healthy, out-of-state, and completely unaware that they had been enrolled in hospice care,” he said. During the press conference, California AG Rob Bonta emphasized that this operation is being run by the state — not federal agencies. Watch this: California AG Rob Bonta is out bragging about finally raiding ten locations and arresting five suspects in a Southern California hospice fraud scheme. He made sure to lecture everyone that his office has been on this "for years" and "successfully" long before anyone else cared,… pic.twitter.com/IRiCnXPaSz — Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) April 9, 2026 California AG Rob Bonta is out bragging about finally raiding ten locations and arresting five suspects in a Southern California hospice fraud scheme. He made sure to lecture everyone that his office has been on this “for years” and “successfully” long before anyone else cared, all while stressing it’s a pure California operation from start to finish. What an absolute CROCK. The only reason Bonta is out in front of the cameras today is because independent journalists and Vice President JD Vance exposed the problem in the first place. CA = Con Artists. Notice how the AG said California has been working on this for years… So why are we only seeing a few arrests now? Are they just really bad at their job? Or, perhaps, they were all content to turn a blind eye to the fraud happening right under their noses up until independent journalists like Nick Shirley started drawing attention to it… Which do you think is more likely? Folks on X have some thoughts: “Look at me, I’ve been overlooking and helping fraud for YEARS but because it was found out by OTHERS, I’ll do what demoncrats do, is take credit where credit is NOT DUE” — Making America American Again

These threats happen way too often. The Department of Justice has just announced that a Florida man has been arrested for threatening to kill President Trump. In a press release, the DOJ announced a 20-year-old man was arrested for posting an Instagram photo of himself holding a rifle with the caption “MAGA Otw to kill trump” Take a look: NEW: Plant City man charged federally after posting Instagram threat with AR-15 to assassinate President Trump Nick Guadalupe Cruz-Lopez, 20, faces up to five years in federal prison for posting a photo of himself holding an AR-15-style rifle with the caption “MAGA Otw to kill… — Florida’s Voice (@FLVoiceNews) April 8, 2026 Read the DOJ’s full report here: Nick Guadalupe Cruz-Lopez (20, Plant City, FL) has been arrested and charged by criminal complaint with making a threat to kill the President of the United States. If convicted, Cruz-Lopez faces a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. United States Attorney Gregory W. Kehoe made the announcement. According to the complaint, on April 2, 2026, Cruz-Lopez posted the following photo on his Instagram account, which stated, “MAGA Otw to kill trump” and showed Cruz-Lopez in a vehicle holding an AR-15 style rifle. Federal agents located Cruz-Lopez that day and arrested him. A criminal complaint is merely a formal charge that a defendant has committed a violation of federal criminal law, and every defendant is presumed innocent unless, and until, proven guilty. This case was investigated by the United States Secret Service. It will be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Ross Roberts. This is one of the numerous times someone has been arrested for threatening the life of President Trump in recent months. On April 1, a Massachusetts man was arrested for allegedly plotting to assassinate Trump. Massachusetts man Andrew D. Emerald was arrested for allegedly plotting to assassinate Trump, after posting specific online threats and brandishing a sword at police. The Joint Terrorism Task Force swooped in to take care of him. Reminder: the FBI really does read your… https://t.co/ieOcA4RlsM pic.twitter.com/Y6VCCG8ACE — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) April 2, 2026 NBC News reported more on the arrest: A Massachusetts man brandished a sword when federal agents tried to arrest him on Wednesday for allegedly making threats online against President Donald Trump, the FBI said. Andrew D. Emerald, of Great Barrington, held “a long, metallic sword in one hand” and a “sheath to that sword in the other hand” when officers showed up at his door. The man, who is in his 40s, told agents they would have to shoot him, according to an affidavit filed Wednesday. Emerald was ultimately arrested with the help of an FBI crisis negotiator and a local police officer who got him to voluntarily leave his residence and surrender to authorities, the affidavit said, adding that the FBI seized multiple swords and bladed weapons from Emerald’s house following his arrest. He was charged with eight counts of interstate transmission of threatening communications and could face up to five years in prison, three years of supervised release and a fine of $250,000 if found guilty. Emerald pleaded not guilty to the charges Wednesday, according to court documents. What’s your perspective?