Right now the same people who got rich selling opioid pills are counting on you not knowing what’s in this article. They built a system designed to keep you coming back, not get better. And it’s worked – on almost everyone. Acute pain – back strain, neck spasms, sprains – isn’t one problem. It’s four. Inflammation. Muscle spasm. Gut damage from the drugs you take for it. And fatigue from the muscle relaxants trying to fix it. Every single-ingredient pill on the market addresses one of those. The other three keep the pain running. That’s not incompetence. That’s a business model. RelieveRx is what happens when physicians who publicly stood against the medical establishment when it cost them something build a pain formula from scratch. Four compounds. Every problem addressed. No opioids. No dependency. No fog. Here’s exactly what’s in it and why it works: – Naproxen at 300mg – kills inflammation at the source. Up to 12 hours. That’s the fire out, not muffled. – Methocarbamol at 300mg – breaks the spasm. The muscle contraction that locks you down long after the injury starts healing. Most pain protocols never touch this. It’s why most people stay stuck. – Famotidine at 10mg – protects your gut from the Naproxen itself. The formula solves the problem its own ingredients would otherwise create. – Caffeine at 60mg – accelerates the whole stack and counteracts the drowsiness from the muscle relaxant. Faster relief. You stay sharp. Four problems. Four solutions. One prescription. A pain clinic charges $150 to $350 just to walk through the door. RelieveRx is less and includes the consultation in the price. A licensed provider reviews your intake and calls you. If approved, your prescription ships from a licensed U.S. pharmacy to your door. Three steps: Order. Fill out a brief medical intake form. Wait for your provider to call. No waiting room. No referral. No being told to come back in six weeks. On a subscription, your provider checks in every two months – adjusting your care, answering questions, making sure it’s working. That’s more follow-up than most Americans get from their primary care doctor in a year. You’ve been managing pain your whole life. You haven’t had the right tool until now. Click here to get what you’ve been missing: RelieveRx. (Note: The information provided is intended for generalized informational purposes only and should not be considered personal medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications. Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the links provided, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to keep you SAFE and HEALTY!)

Barack Obama spent years telling the country that gerrymandering was destroying American democracy. He launched an entire initiative dedicated to fighting it. He recorded videos about it. He wrote about it on social media. And now, with a critical vote just days away, he wants Virginians to approve one of the most aggressive gerrymanders in modern history. Obama just released a video urging Virginia voters to approve a redistricting referendum on April 21 that would strip power from the state’s nonpartisan redistricting commission and hand it directly to the Democrat-controlled legislature. The projected result? A congressional map that gives Democrats 10 of Virginia’s 11 House seats. Republicans would be left with just one. The New York Post highlighted how ABC News even ran Obama’s campaign video as a breaking news “exclusive,” drawing immediate backlash from journalists and commentators. ABC News faces backlash for presenting Obama campaign ad as an 'exclusive' on redistricting measure https://t.co/TIZisxshHO pic.twitter.com/qs3zPzhsE4— New York Post (@nypost) April 18, 2026 In his video, Obama urged voters to “push back against the Republicans trying to give themselves an unfair advantage in the midterms” and called the redistricting measure “a temporary step to level the playing field.” Level the playing field? Virginia already has a 6-5 Democratic advantage in its congressional delegation. Turning that into 10-1 isn’t leveling anything. It’s a steamroller. Fox News had more on the details: If approved, the measure would transfer temporary redistricting power from Virginia’s current nonpartisan commission to the Democrat-controlled state legislature through the 2030 election cycle. The redistricting could shift Virginia’s congressional delegation from a current 6-5 Democratic advantage to a 10-1 Democratic advantage, a gain of four seats for Democrats in the U.S. House. Obama’s video was released by Virginians for Fair Elections, the Democrat-aligned group supporting the measure. Supporters have significantly outraised opponents, with House Majority Forward contributing roughly half of $40 million to the campaign. $40 million pumped into a single state redistricting push. That should tell you everything you need to know about how badly Democrats want this. Veteran journalist Mark Hemingway called out the media angle perfectly. Why the hell does a major news network consider an extremely partisan campaign ad an "exclusive"? https://t.co/k3hM1Ru7hW— Mark Hemingway (@Heminator) April 17, 2026 It’s a fair question. When a former president records a campaign ad for one political party’s redistricting effort, and a major news network runs it as an “exclusive” news story, that’s not journalism. That’s a donation. But the most damaging part of all this is Obama’s own track record. CNN reported on how Obama’s own past statements are being used against him: Having promoted nonpartisan redistricting in the past, Obama and other top Democrats now have to motivate voters to turn out for a special election to impose a gerrymander that could leave Republicans with just one out of 11 US House seats in the state. A group urging Virginians to vote no has sent mailers featuring Obama’s image alongside a six-year-old quote saying, “For too long, gerrymandering has contributed to stalled progress and warped our representative government.” Another past Obama quote states: “Because of things like political gerrymandering, our parties have moved further and further apart.” Read those quotes one more time. Then read what Obama is pushing right now in Virginia. Same man. Completely opposite position. This isn’t complicated. When your guy does it, it’s “restoring fairness.” When the other side does it, it’s “warping our representative government.” The only thing that changed is which party stands to benefit. Former Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin reportedly called the measure “the most blatant seizure of individual rights that any of us have seen in the Commonwealth.” The Virginia GOP has called it an “unconstitutional gerrymandering power grab.” Virginia voters will decide on April 21. Polls show the measure barely ahead, with a Washington Post/Schar School survey finding 52% in favor and 47% opposed. This is going to be close. And somewhere out there, a six-year-old Obama quote about the dangers of gerrymandering is sitting on a mailer in a Virginia mailbox, staring right back at the man who wrote it.

Gavin Newsom wanted America to believe his memoir was a hit. He toured. He promoted. He hit the bestseller lists. The whole thing looked like a legitimate cultural moment for a man openly running for the White House. There was just one problem. The numbers were fake. Federal disclosure records have now revealed that Newsom’s own super PAC, the Campaign for Democracy Committee, spent $1.5 million to purchase roughly 67,000 copies of his memoir, “Young Man in a Hurry.” Total print sales for the book since its February 24 release? About 97,400 copies. Do the math. That means nearly two out of every three copies sold went to his own PAC, not to actual readers. Libs of TikTok put the numbers out there for everyone to see. BREAKING: Gavin Newsom’s PAC used $1.5 million to buy 67,000 copies of HIS OWN BOOK. Total book sales were around 97,400. His PAC’s purchase accounts for about two-thirds of all sold copies pic.twitter.com/mnBaHl7ZFf — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 17, 2026 The details are even more embarrassing than the headline. The PAC ran a promotion last November and January asking donors to contribute “ANY AMOUNT” and they would receive a copy of the book when it dropped. Federal filings show the PAC paid $1,561,875 to Porchlight Book Company to fulfill those orders, making it the committee’s largest expenditure in the first quarter of 2026. Strip out the PAC purchases and Newsom’s memoir sold approximately 30,000 copies over six weeks. For context, that is not bestseller territory. That is a mediocre launch for a sitting governor running for president. The New York Times reported on the discrepancy: Approximately 97,400 print copies of Mr. Newsom’s memoir have been sold since its publication on February 24, according to the book industry sales tracker Circana BookScan. Federal disclosures reveal that roughly 67,000 of those copies were purchased by his super PAC, the Campaign for Democracy Committee, which paid $1,561,875 to Porchlight Book Company. The New York Times marked the book with a dagger symbol on its bestseller list, which the paper uses “when it has reason to believe that sales of a book include a mix of organic and bulk sales.” That dagger symbol is essentially the Times admitting they know the bestseller status was manufactured. And they put it on the list anyway. The reaction online was exactly what you would expect. And now you know how crappy books become NYTimes bestsellers… https://t.co/3mW0Ws4yzF — John Λ Konrad V (@johnkonrad) April 17, 2026 Newsom’s team has tried to spin the numbers, claiming the promotion “generated net revenue” and “deepened supporter relationships.” That is one way to describe using donor money to buy your own book so you can call yourself a bestselling author. The Megyn Kelly Show laid out the implications: In March, Newsom’s team had claimed more than 91,000 copies had been purchased through “organic, in-person and online, non-bulk purchases.” That claim now appears to have been misleading at best. The PAC’s bulk purchase of 67,000 copies means the overwhelming majority of early sales were anything but organic. After the initial PAC-driven surge, subsequent weekly sales have been modest, with approximately 6,400 organic copies sold in the six weeks following the book’s launch. So Newsom’s team claimed 91,000 “organic” sales. The real number of organic copies sold? Around 6,400 in six weeks. That is not a rounding error. That is a fabrication. This is the man who wants to be President. A man who cannot even sell a book without rigging the system. If he will spend $1.5 million in donor money to fake a bestseller list, what would he do with actual power? California voters already know the answer to that question.Do you agree?

A group of conservative House Republicans just did something that rarely happens in Washington anymore: they said no. In the early hours of Friday morning, more than 20 Republican members voted to block two separate attempts to ram through a long-term reauthorization of FISA Section 702, the controversial surveillance program that allows the federal government to collect Americans’ communications without a warrant. The rebellion killed both proposals dead on the House floor, handing GOP leadership and the White House a rare defeat. The Freedom Caucus-led revolt centered on a simple demand: if the government wants to spy on American citizens, it needs to get a warrant first. That’s not a radical position. That’s the Fourth Amendment. Rep. Thomas Massie laid it all out after the late-night showdown: Last night between midnight and 2am, they tried to pass two bad versions of FISA… Both would have allowed Feds to unconstitutionally spy on Americans.We stopped both versions, but the fight isn’t over. Eventually, it was decided to give them two more weeks to fix FISA. https://t.co/VkckZwH5j4— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) April 17, 2026 The battle lines were clear. Speaker Mike Johnson and the White House wanted a clean 18-month extension with no changes. Privacy hawks in the party, led by Freedom Caucus Chairman Andy Harris and members like Massie, Lauren Boebert, and Chip Roy, demanded amendments that would require a warrant before querying Americans’ data. Twenty Republicans voted against the 18-month extension in the procedural vote, tanking it 197-228. A second attempt also failed. The leadership simply didn’t have the votes. Massie revealed he had personally reviewed classified documents that shaped his opposition: I just viewed 2 Top Secret FISA docs.1) FISA Court opinion that raises serious concerns about FBI implementation of FISA 702.2) letter by Senator Wyden describing a secret government interpretation of FISA law.The Constitution requires I vote No on FISA 702 reauthorization.— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) April 16, 2026 Fox News reported on the scale of the conservative opposition: Speaker Mike Johnson faces conservative opposition over reauthorizing Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, set to expire April 20. Trump and Johnson support an 18-month clean extension, while conservatives demand privacy safeguards. Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris predicted the procedural vote would fail without additional privacy reforms. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna pledged to vote no unless the SAVE America Act was included. CIA Director John Ratcliffe told Fox News: “There’s a lot at stake.” The intelligence community’s argument was straightforward: losing Section 702 during the ongoing Iran conflict would be a national security risk. Gen. Dan Caine warned it would “significantly impair” U.S. security capabilities. CNN detailed the aftermath: More than a dozen rank-and-file Republicans rejected the long-term reauthorization. Twenty Republicans later helped block the 18-month clean reauthorization. GOP privacy hawks demanded floor consideration for warrant-requirement amendments before querying Americans’ communications, demands leadership could not satisfy. Congress ultimately approved a 10-day short-term extension through April 30, 2026, after the long-term deal collapsed. President Trump was expected to sign the measure. So in the end, Congress kicked the can down the road. FISA gets a 10-day lifeline through April 30 while lawmakers try again to hash out a deal that actually includes privacy protections. The Freedom Caucus made their point loud and clear at 2 AM on a Friday morning: the Constitution doesn’t take a break just because it’s politically convenient.

Patrick Bet-David just turned this feud with Tucker Carlson up to eleven. The Valuetainment CEO and PBD Podcast host dropped a direct challenge to Tucker on his show that is going massively viral right now. And it’s not some vague back-and-forth. It’s a put-up-or-shut-up demand to open the books. Bet-David looked into the camera and challenged Carlson to hire third-party accounting firms to audit both of their financials. The purpose? To settle once and for all whether PBD has ever taken money from Israel, or whether Tucker has ever received payments from Qatar or Pakistan. That’s not a talking point. That’s a man willing to bet his entire reputation on transparency. Check it out: BREAKING: Patrick Bet David just directly challenged Tucker Carlson.“Let’s hire third party accounting firms to go through our financials and see if I’ve ever taken money from Israel or if you’ve ever taken money from Qatar or Pakistan.” pic.twitter.com/dNhhpBegq6— Eyal Yakoby (@EYakoby) April 18, 2026 The clip is racking up hundreds of thousands of views already, and for good reason. This is the kind of thing people have been demanding from media figures for years: real accountability, not just accusations thrown back and forth on podcasts. Oh WOW!