Amy Coney Barrett testified to Congress today, and the results were stunning. Even a very slight reading between the lines seems to suggest she is fully compromised and issuing compromised rulings because she is scared for her life and her family’s life. Visibly shaken: Barrett seems shaken while explaining that she didnt think that being a Supreme Court justice would mean she had to explain to her 12 year old son what a bullet proof vest was. Admitting she is clueless about the terrorist nature of the Left. She is not fit for the role. https://t.co/5n2OLhgJP1 — Good Lawgic (@TheFollowingPro) July 14, 2026 The only thing everyone is seeing is that she is no longer issuing independent decisions, she clearly seems influenced and altered: Breanna 100% correct. Amy Coney Barrett should step down after this testimony. She just admitted she's shook and it clearly impacts her decisions. That's FEAR on her face. https://t.co/ruCkOkdMIE — Rich Baris THE PEOPLE'S PUNDIT (@Peoples_Pundit) July 14, 2026 Compromised: Translation: She is now publicly admitting she is compromised by threats against her family. https://t.co/eQMpj5xmZu — Mike Davis (@mrddmia) July 14, 2026 Huge mistake: I’ve been off X, but as someone who has been “swatted” much more seriously, this is a HUGE mistake by Justice Barrett. It tells the perps they are succeeding in intimidating her and invites more. The key is to carry on boldly. She must resign. https://t.co/DA8xL51fAw — Larry Alex Taunton (@LarryTaunton) July 14, 2026 It seems like she has now admitted it: Did Justice Barrett just tell us she voted incorrectly on birthright citizenship because she is afraid of the Left who support it? She did, didn't she. https://t.co/NvzeoDqZoR — Joshua Lisec, The Ghostwriter (@JoshuaLisec) July 14, 2026 Should she resign? If Amy Coney Barrett can no longer make sound, consistent judgments, then yes, I believe it’s time for her to resign. pic.twitter.com/nZcG1L4W6M — Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) July 14, 2026 Your opinion? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Amy Coney Barrett Badly Shaken In Testimony To Congress — Reveals She Has Been Compromised? appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said on Tuesday that Justice Department records revealed that former special counsel Jack Smith’s team obtained text messages sent by 44 members of Congress. “I received records frm DOJ confirming Jack Smith’s investigative team reviewed the contents of text msgs sent by 44 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Im 1 of the 44,” Grassley said. “Im alerting my colleagues who were impacted and will release the records w Sen Johnson so American ppl can see the evidence,” he added. I received records frm DOJ confirming Jack Smith's investigative team reviewed the contents of text msgs sent by 44 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS Im 1 of the 44 Im alerting my colleagues who were impacted and will release the records w Sen Johnson so American ppl can see the evidence — Chuck Grassley (@ChuckGrassley) July 14, 2026 According to POLITICO, the text messages were sent from the Congress members to “senior White House officials during the final weeks of President Donald Trump’s first term.” “Jack Smith’s team swept up private text messages from 44 members of Congress — Republicans and Democrats — while investigating Trump, bypassing the required filter review process designed to protect attorney-client privilege and constitutional protections,” Fox News wrote. “Senate Judiciary Chairman Grassley and Sen. Ron Johnson say the records, provided by the Trump Justice Department, show Smith’s team circumvented its own protocols. The situation is further complicated by Smith’s prior testimony under oath, in which he answered ‘no’ when asked whether records he requested from congresspeople included text messages,” it continued. Jack Smith's team swept up private text messages from 44 members of Congress — Republicans and Democrats — while investigating Trump, bypassing the required filter review process designed to protect attorney-client privilege and constitutional protections. Senate Judiciary… pic.twitter.com/P6UC7sOHYi — Fox News Politics (@foxnewspolitics) July 14, 2026 POLITICO shared further: The latest exchanges were part of a trove of materials that the National Archives turned over to Smith’s team following a subpoena for White House records stretching from Oct. 2020 to Jan. 2021. Smith’s top deputies received the materials in August 2023, just weeks after securing a grand jury indictment against Trump — and, according to internal emails Grassley released Tuesday, indicated they were quickly preparing to share them with Trump’s legal team as part of the pre-trial “discovery” process.” Grassley’s release of these materials is part of a broader effort by the Iowa Republican and other Trump allies to portray Smith as a reckless or overaggressive prosecutor in his pursuit of criminal cases against Trump during the Biden administration, which many GOP lawmakers believe were politically motivated. Grassley was already on the warpath for Smith after learning that investigators obtained his call records as part of Smith’s investigation into Trump’s efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election, which culminated in the Capitol attack on Jan. 6, 2021. “Jack Smith has answering to do, and I intend to have him before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the coming months to hold him accountable,” said Grassley. “Newly declassified records reveal Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team unlawfully (in violation of Constitution) accessed text messages to and from the following current and former Senators and House members,” reporter Paul Sperry said. Sperry provided a list of the 44 Congress members: BREAKING: Newly declassified records reveal Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team unlawfully (in violation of Constitution) accessed text messages to and from the following current and former Senators and House members:1. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) 2. Senator Ron Johnson… — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) July 14, 2026 Full list below: 1. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) 2. Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) 3. Senator John Cornyn (R-Texas) 4. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) 5. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) 6. Senator Mike Lee (R-Utah) 7. Senator Cory Booker (D-N.J.) 8. Senator Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.) 9. Senator Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska) 10. Senator David Perdue (R-Ga.) 11. Senator Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) 12. Senator Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) 13. Senator Rand Paul (R-Ky.) 14. Senator Rick Scott (R-Fla.) 15. Senator Rob Portman (R-Ohio) 16. Senator Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) 17. Senator Susan Collins (R-Maine) 18. Senator Tim Scott (R-S.C.) 19. Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) 20. Senator Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) 21. Rep. Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) 22. Rep. Steve Scalise (R-La.) 23. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) 24. Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) 25. Rep. Adam Smith (D-Wash.) 26. Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) 27. Rep. Mark Walker (R-N.C.) 28. Rep. Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) 29. Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.) 30. Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) 31. Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) 32. Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) 33. Rep. John Katko (R-N.Y.) 34. Rep. Joshua Gottheimer (D-N.J.) 35. Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.) 36. Rep. Ken Buck (R-Colo.) 37. Rep. Lee Zeldin (R-N.Y.) 38. Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.) 39. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) 40. Rep. Morgan Griffith (R-Va.) 41. Rep. Rodney Davis (R-Ill.) 42. Rep. Russ Fulcher (R-Idaho) 43. Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) 44. Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) “December 2025: Jack Smith swore under oath that he didn’t spy on text messages belonging to members of Congress. Today: New evidence confirms he spied on dozens of members of Congress, myself included,” Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) commented. “This is a blatant abuse of power, and exactly what our Founders warned about,” he added. December 2025: Jack Smith swore under oath that he didn't spy on text messages belonging to members of Congress. Today: New evidence confirms he spied on dozens of members of Congress, myself included. This is a blatant abuse of power, and exactly what our Founders warned… pic.twitter.com/3eqwiylLXI — Rand Paul (@RandPaul) July 14, 2026 Fox News has more: Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., one of the lawmakers whose texts were swept up in this way, said Tuesday such reviews amounted to clear violations of the Constitution’s speech and debate clause that protects lawmakers from being questioned in “any other place” than the Capitol for legislative acts. Internal communications have been historically included in that clause in the courts as technology has advanced. Stefanik said in a statement that the new records prove Smith’s team “unlawfully and unconstitutionally accessed my private text messages, along with 43 other Members of Congress, in clear violation of the Constitution.” She said she long suspected there had been “unconstitutional spy[ing] on members of Congress.” The post Justice Department Records Reveal Jack Smith’s Team “Spied On Dozens” Of Congress Members, GOP Senator Says appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Four years and eight months. That is the prison sentence for a crash that killed Clarence Nelson, Lisa Nelson and Jaime Flores Garcia. Four other people were injured. Eight vehicles were smashed across a Southern California freeway. Three families walked into a courtroom Tuesday knowing their loved ones would never come home. Jashanpreet Singh’s punishment amounts to 56 months. Nobody should reduce a human life to prison arithmetic. But when one man’s gross negligence takes three lives, the scale of the consequence matters. Less than five years is stunning. News of the sentence immediately ignited outrage: NEW: Illegal immigrant who killed 3 people after plowing his truck into multiple vehicles in Southern California, sentenced to just 5 years in prison. Indian Jashanpreet Singh, who was under the influence of drugs when he crashed, entered the country during the Biden admin. He… pic.twitter.com/gZivECgL0C — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) July 15, 2026 One important correction is necessary. The post repeats the original allegation that Singh was under the influence of drugs. That allegation did not survive toxicology testing. Prosecutors later said none of the tested substances were found in Singh’s blood, and the DUI and intoxication-based manslaughter counts were removed. Singh was not convicted of drug-impaired driving. The truth is bad enough without keeping a discarded allegation alive. Singh pleaded guilty to three felony counts of vehicular manslaughter with gross negligence after driving a semi-truck into slowed traffic and causing a chain-reaction collision that killed three people. NBC Los Angeles reported that Singh received the four-year, eight-month sentence Tuesday in Rancho Cucamonga after changing his plea from not guilty to guilty ahead of sentencing. The families of the people killed were in the courtroom for the final reckoning. One family delivered a victim-impact statement before the sentence was handed down. Singh had been driving a semi on Interstate 10 in Ontario when he hit seven other vehicles: three semi-trucks, two pickup trucks and two cars. Three people died and four more were hurt. A witness said the truck never stopped, swerved or made any visible attempt to avoid the traffic ahead. The California Highway Patrol said westbound traffic had slowed, but Singh’s rig did not. The witness remembered the collision sounding like an explosion and said the red semi continued into the pileup before rolling toward an embankment. He then saw the driver jump out as the truck caught fire. NBC’s report leaves no ambiguity about the number that came out of court. The sentence was not rounded to “about five years” by the judge: it was four years and eight months for the crash Singh admitted causing. ABC7’s report includes video from the sentencing and identifies Singh’s immigration status according to the Department of Homeland Security: A semitruck driver was sentenced to four years and eight months in prison for an eight-vehicle crash that killed three people on the 10 Freeway in Ontario last year. U.S. Homeland Security officials said the driver, Jashanpreet Singh, was in the country illegally. Eyewitness… pic.twitter.com/iHe9c9vewj — ABC7 Eyewitness News (@ABC7) July 15, 2026 The San Bernardino County District Attorney’s Office built the public record in two stages. Investigators initially arrested Singh on suspicion of DUI after dashcam footage and eyewitness accounts showed his truck traveling at high speed into stopped traffic. The office later updated the case when the toxicology results came back negative for the tested substances. Prosecutors did not abandon the homicide case. They amended it around gross negligence, filing three manslaughter counts for the deaths of Jaime Flores Garcia, Lisa Nelson and Clarence Nelson, plus a felony reckless-driving count involving injuries to two survivors. The crash happened October 21, 2025, on the westbound 10 Freeway near the Milliken Avenue offramp. The original complaint was replaced on October 28 after the toxicology evidence changed the legal theory of the case. The amended court filing identifies bone fractures suffered by two survivors and includes great-bodily-injury allegations tied to the reckless-driving count. Prosecutors continued to characterize the deaths as the result of gross negligence even after removing every intoxication-based count. The final guilty pleas were to the three manslaughter counts. The deaths were not disputed away. The drug allegation was. CBS Los Angeles reported the toxicology correction in November, after the district attorney filed the amended complaint. The revised charges accused Singh of grossly negligent vehicular manslaughter and reckless driving causing injury. Prosecutors did not publicly identify whether distraction, fatigue or another factor explained why the truck failed to stop. That unanswered question matters, but it does not erase the conduct Singh admitted. A commercial driver sent an 18-wheeler into traffic without stopping, and three people died as a result. CBS also reported that CHP investigators concluded Singh failed to stop before striking the back of another vehicle and starting the deadly chain reaction. He remained jailed without bail while the amended charges moved forward. The same report captured the dispute surrounding his immigration paperwork. DHS said Singh crossed the southern border in 2022, while California officials pointed to federally approved employment authorization that allowed him to work and obtain a REAL ID. The public can be furious about the sentence while remaining accurate about the crime. NBC summarized the guilty plea before Tuesday’s hearing: Jashanpreet Singh was driving a semi-truck when he crashed into seven other cars, killing three people, officials said. https://t.co/PbiBONA2NM — NBC Los Angeles (@NBCLA) July 10, 2026 The immigration and licensing history adds another layer of accountability. NBC Los Angeles reported before sentencing that DHS described Singh as a 21-year-old undocumented immigrant from India who entered through the southern border in 2022. The California Department of Motor Vehicles confirmed that he held a California commercial driver’s license. California transportation officials previously said the federal government had approved employment-authorization documents that allowed Singh to work and obtain a REAL ID. That was their answer to the federal criticism surrounding his license. The plea report also confirmed that Singh had changed his position in court after months of maintaining his innocence. He entered guilty pleas to all three gross-negligence manslaughter counts during a June hearing, clearing the way for Tuesday’s sentencing. By then, the basic scale of the crash was uncontested: one semi driven by Singh, seven vehicles struck, three people dead and four more injured. The California licensing system had placed a commercial rig in his hands, and the criminal case ended with his admission that gross negligence killed three people. But a work permit does not answer the public-safety question. How did a driver who would later admit gross negligence end up entrusted with a vehicle capable of turning one missed stop into a mass-casualty scene? Why did a system spanning the border, federal work authorization and state commercial licensing fail to prevent this outcome? And after three deaths, why is the prison sentence only four years and eight months? Those questions do not require a false drug claim. They rest on the verified record: Singh entered the country during the Biden administration, obtained authorization to work, received a California commercial license, drove a semi into slowed traffic, killed three people, injured four more and pleaded guilty to three felony manslaughter counts. Now he has received less than five years in prison. The court’s sentence ends in 56 months. The Nelson and Flores Garcia families will carry theirs for the rest of their lives. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post OUTRAGE: Illegal Immigrant Who Killed 3 In Horrific Semi-Truck Crash Gets Stunningly Light Prison Sentence appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

New York on Tuesday became the first state to impose a moratorium on the construction of new hyperscale data centers. “Governor Kathy Hochul today signed an Executive Order to create the nation’s first moratorium on new hyperscale data centers, establishing the strongest standards for data center development and creating a blueprint to support localities. The Governor is temporarily pausing State environmental permits for up to one year in order to build a nation-leading regulatory framework that protects ratepayers, the environment, the energy grid and communities across the state,” Gov. Kathy Hochul’s office announced in a press release. “New York has always been at the forefront of innovation and change but we’ve also always guaranteed that New Yorkers benefit. As data center development threatens to hike up utility bills, deplete our natural resources, and create uncertainty for New Yorkers, it’s my responsibility to take action and lead,” Hochul said. “New York will lead the way in creating the strongest standards in the nation for data center development, ensuring that when companies succeed because of New York, New Yorkers succeed too,” she added. New York to impose the country’s first statewide moratorium on data centers. https://t.co/cDwq7JDYGs — NBC News (@NBCNews) July 14, 2026 ABC News shared further: Hyperscale data centers provide the computing power necessary to process large amounts of data, such as the kind needed to run AI systems. They typically house thousands of computer servers and require tremendous amounts of land, water for cooling, and energy, potentially straining local power grids, while employing few workers long-term, relative to their size. Hochul said Tuesday that the hyperscale centers’ strain on resources could become a burden on New Yorkers. “These hyperscale AI data centers consume enormous amounts of power, truly threatening to outpace our grid’s capacity, and they drive up costs for local ratepayers,” she said. She added, “I refuse to let those costs be passed on to New Yorkers who already pay too much for their utility bills.” New York pays the fourth highest amount for energy of all states in the nation, according to Empire Center, a nonprofit think tank focusing on public policy, which also found that in April 2026, New Yorkers paid 56% above the national average on price per kilowatt-hour. “The bottom line is: Progress shouldn’t arrive with a higher utility bill, depleted water supplies, or noise pollution,” Hochul said. Watch below: New York becomes the first state to impose a data-center moratorium. 'The bottom line is: Progress shouldn't arrive with a higher utility bill, depleted water supplies, or noise pollution,' New York Governor Kathy Hochul said https://t.co/9DvlhZuiZU pic.twitter.com/kmSCFh4sbU — Reuters (@Reuters) July 14, 2026 More from The New York Times: The order will take effect immediately. It is not expected to affect the data demands of back-office financial services, hospitals or universities. The news was met with criticism from tech business groups and several construction unions that had expected to benefit from the building of data centers. “A shortsighted moratorium only accomplishes one thing: It kills good-paying union jobs,” said Mark McManus, the president of the United Association, which represents plumbers and pipefitters. He added that the governor should instead institute “common-sense guardrails.” But the move was celebrated by conservationists and by other Democratic politicians who hailed the governor’s mettle in standing up to Big Tech. Laura Shindell, the New York State director at the nonprofit Food & Water Watch, called the moratorium “a huge step forward.” “It comes as the direct result of immense public pressure from people across the state demanding their elected leaders protect them from Big Tech’s assault, which threatens the state’s clean air and water and New Yorkers’ financial security,” she said. A recent Gallup poll showed that Republicans and Democrats alike oppose data center construction, citing the facilities’ rapacious demand for water and energy at a time when electricity costs are rising. Watch additional coverage below: The post Democrat Governor Announces Nation’s First Statewide Data Center Moratorium appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

The Senate on Tuesday failed to pass the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The defense policy bill, which has a section that would integrate the United States and Israeli militaries, was blocked in a 50-46 vote. Section Of Drafted 2027 NDAA Allegedly Would “Integrate/Synchronize” The United States And Israeli Militaries It requires 60 votes to pass.