In 1827, the Supreme Court settled a question most Americans have never thought to ask: Who decides when America is in a state of “insurrection”? Their answer: the authority “belongs exclusively to the President.” And his decision is “conclusive.” In other words… We don’t need a vote from Congress. Or a sign-off from a judge. This summer… One man – Donald Trump – could overrule every other branch of government – including the all-powerful “Deep State.” It may seem impossible. But history shows… Meanwhile, his rivals are gearing up for a fight. Democrat attorneys general say they’ll attack Trump in court if he dares to use this power.  But Jim Rickards — a former advisor to four Presidents, the CIA, and the Pentagon — says they will soon find out they’re wasting their breath. History shows he could be right. Because the age-old ruling behind Trump’s actions has never been overturned. It could all come to a head within weeks, this summer… Tipping American politics… and even the financial system into a melt-down unlike any we’ve seen in a century. Rickards’ free briefing is here. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!) This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post JUST IN: A 199-Year-Old Supreme Court Ruling Could Hand the President Unlimited Power this Summer appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

A man climbed to the top of the Brooklyn Bridge, stripped off his clothes, and jumped more than 200 feet toward the East River. Somehow, he lived. The astonishing scene unfolded Sunday afternoon on the Manhattan side of the bridge, where police said the 44-year-old man made his way onto the north tower and displayed multiple flags. NYPD Emergency Service Unit officers tried to persuade him to come down. Instead, he jumped. The on-scene video is difficult to believe. The man can be seen falling toward the river while holding what appears to be a bag or piece of clothing above his head:   That fall should have been fatal. Police Harbor Unit officers pulled the man from the East River and rushed him to Bellevue Hospital. He was listed in stable condition. The New York Post identified the jumper as Galymzhan Abaildayev, 44. The paper reported that he climbed the north tower on the Manhattan side, raised several flags — including the flag of Kazakhstan — and removed his clothes before leaping into the water. Witnesses watched from below as police activity shut down traffic around the famous bridge. Video captured the final seconds before the plunge, but it does not establish whether the item above Abaildayev’s head played any role in his survival. The footage shows the fall and the immediate danger; it does not answer the medical question of how he lived. After he was rescued and hospitalized, police charged him with reckless endangerment, criminal trespass, public lewdness, disorderly conduct, and making graffiti. The survival itself is almost impossible to comprehend. A separate New York Post trauma analysis spoke with Dr. David Shapiro, a trauma surgeon who has treated patients after high falls. He said the man’s body position at impact may have been decisive. A near-vertical entry can reduce the surface area striking the water at once, but Shapiro emphasized that a fall from that height is normally overwhelming. The impact can cause catastrophic injuries to the spine, skull, pelvis, and internal organs even when a victim initially survives. The surgeon also cautioned that complications can appear later. A stable condition immediately after rescue does not erase the danger posed by internal bleeding or delayed organ damage. There is no verified evidence that the bag or clothing acted as a working parachute. The combination of his entry angle, the rapid Harbor Unit response, and sheer fortune may be the closest thing to an explanation. The Brooklyn Bridge has been the setting for dangerous stunts since the 1800s, but surviving a plunge from near the top remains extraordinarily rare. Water struck at that speed can behave more like a solid surface than a soft landing. Abaildayev now faces criminal charges once his medical condition permits the legal process to move forward. He jumped from one of America’s most famous landmarks, plunged hundreds of feet toward the East River, and came out alive. His survival was extraordinary, but repeating the leap could easily be fatal. If you or someone you know is in crisis or considering self-harm, call or text 988 in the United States for immediate help. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post WATCH: Man Jumps 200 Feet High Off The Brooklyn Bridge…and Somehow Lives! appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

President Trump has had enough of oil executives touting their quarterly earnings on financial news programs. On Monday, President Trump took to Truth Social and let the CEO of Chevron have a piece of his mind. Trump wrote, that oil companies such as Chevron have made a fortune during the Iran War and later demanded Chevron to lower their gas prices. It didn’t stop there though. Trump later called out Exxon Mobil as well while speaking to the press inside of the Oval Office. Yahoo News provided further details on Trump’s call out on the big oil companies: President Donald Trump turned up the heat on Exxon Mobil and Chevron over high gasoline prices on Monday, blasting his longtime industry allies for “making too much money” while Americans struggle with higher prices at the pump. Oil majors have reported bumper quarterly earnings, buoyed by higher crude prices caused by the supply disruptions in the Middle East and the soaring profit margins for refineries. That has put targets on the backs of companies as the Trump administration faces mounting pressure to show it is working to bring down high gas prices ahead of the midterm elections. “Based on a shortage, they’re making too much money,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office Monday. “I don’t like it, and I should be the last one to say because I’m a big free enterprise guy — nobody bigger.” Trump specifically called out the two biggest U.S. oil producers by name after both reported strong earnings on Friday. “Chevron, too much money. Exxon Mobil, too much, too much money,” Trump said. “They ought to give some of that back to the public, and they better cut the retail price, the consumer price.” The average U.S. retail gasoline price has hovered near $4.10 a gallon for the past week, up from less than $3 before the United States and Israel launched their attacks against Iran in February. In late June, Trump ordered the Justice Department to investigate big oil companies for not bringing gasoline prices down fast enough as crude oil prices weakened. Pump prices are generally set by the retailers, often sole proprietors, who own gas stations, rather than major oil producers. Take a look: Mike Wirth, Chairman and CEO of Chevron, just gave, in an interview with the fabulous Maria Bartiromo, all of the reasons that his company is doing so well. The only thing he conveniently forgot to mention is that, without the genius, foresight, strength, and stability, of the… pic.twitter.com/1GkMv98fiJ — Commentary Donald J. Trump Truth Social Posts On X (@TrumpTruthOnX) August 3, 2026   This was Wirth’s appearance on Fox News that Trump was responding to: Here’s Chevron’s Mike Wirth yesterday morning with Maria touting his company’s great numbers without mentioning it’s all thanks to the Trump Administration! pic.twitter.com/IoCmRjiKKh — JKash MAGA Queen (@JKash000) August 3, 2026 Watch the moment Trump called out Chevron and Exxon Mobil: President Trump says that despite high oil prices, companies like Chevron and Exxon Mobil are making "too much money," amid the U.S. — Iran war: "I don't like it… They ought to give some of that back to the public." pic.twitter.com/pcYg3BlsRf — CSPAN (@cspan) August 3, 2026 The People’s President is right! The oil companies should give back to the public by lowering prices at the pump! Trump’s comments come as he has giving one last chance to Iran. CBS News reported more on Trump’s last lifeline to Iran: After he again backed down on further attacks against Iran to allow for negotiations, President Trump was asked what his message is to the American people. “Well, you don’t know, I don’t know, I think we’re going to maybe get something,” the president told a reporter in the Oval Office. “But I want to give them every last chance before decapitation. Very tough to do what we have planned, still planned. We’ll see what happens.” “I’m very proud of the fact that I will give people, I’ll give people a chance,” he added. What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post President Trump Blasts Chevron And Exxon Mobil Executives: “Get Gas Prices Down Now!” appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

A steady stream of establishment Democrats continue to speak out against an uprising of far-left extremists running for, and often winning, competitive primary elections against more moderate members of the party. Most recently, longtime Democrat Party operative Donna Brazile set her sights on the “socialist wave,” which she cast as a fledgling movement unlikely to capture the broader party. Here’s a relevant portion of the transcript, via Breitbart: GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Donna, we’ve seen these insurgents from the Democratic socialists of America making a lot of headway in House primaries. El-Sayed in Michigan is not formally a socialist, but he’s from the progressive wing. How much is that going to hurt Democrats in the fall? BRAZILE: Well, first of all, George, when you look at the DSA, which is not the Democratic Party, so I had to go online to figure it out. They ran 29 candidates. They’ve lost 11. They’ve won seven. And there’s still an opportunity for them if they play their cards right, maybe to pick up three or four more seats. The problem right now, George, is that the Democratic Party must define itself and make sure that we don’t get caught in this socialist wave, which is, you know, popping up here, there and everywhere. But I think Michigan is going to tell us a lot about this current electorate. We know they’re angry, they want change. And both candidates are trying not to allow the labels to define them. Miss Stevens said I’m not a moderate, I’m a populist. Mr. Abdul said I’m not a progressive, I’m a populist. They want to capture this anger and they want to see if they can ride it to the polls.   The race is attracting attention nationwide: Michigan Democrats are divided over the future of the party as progressive candidate Abdul El-Sayed and establishment-backed Rep. Haley Stevens battle for the Democratic Senate nomination. El-Sayed, endorsed by Bernie Sanders and other progressive leaders, is campaigning on… pic.twitter.com/r28cQ0qv76 — Fox News (@FoxNews) August 3, 2026 Michigan Democrat Mayor Abdullah Hammoud, at a rally for Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed: “Abdul is as American as any other name in this country. It’s one of the strongest American names you can have.” pic.twitter.com/BQdNTHK8qV — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 1, 2026 Michigan Senate candidate Haley Stevens commits to supporting her opponent Abdul El-Sayed — who wants to defund the police and campaigns with Hasan Piker — if he wins the primary: "You bet…I am on the team, alright. And I am gonna link arms and do whatever’s needed.” pic.twitter.com/ItNw84TIfN — RNC Research (@RNCResearch) August 1, 2026 Newsmax added these details: Abdul El-Sayed, a former Wayne County health director backed by Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., has surged into a double-digit lead over Rep. Haley Stevens, D-Mich., in the Democratic Senate primary. An Emerson College Polling/WLNS/WOODTV survey of 700 likely primary voters conducted July 26-27 showed him ahead 54% to 39%, with a credibility interval of plus or minus 3.7 percentage points. Here’s a clip of Brazile’s remarks: What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Donna Brazile Is Latest Prominent Democrat To Sound The Alarm Over Party’s ‘Socialist Wave’ appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

New York will soon require social media users to verify their age, a form of digital ID, to access algorithmic feeds between midnight and 6 a.m. The law, called the Stop Addictive Feeds Exploitation (SAFE) for Kids Act, aims to enact social media restrictions for children and teenagers that curb access to “addictive” design features unless they obtain parental consent. Although the legislation is written for minors, the age verification will impact every social media user. The law takes effect in January. “Social media companies, you’re now on notice,” Gov. Kathy Hochul said in a press conference, according to New York Daily News. “Any platform that attempts to bombard our young people with addictive feeds or to monetize their mental health — which is exactly what’s going on — will face legal action,” she added. Tech companies with young users have until January 2027 to comply with New York’s sweeping finalized guardrails on social media platforms. https://t.co/PruvOjJVrF — Bloomberg Government (@BGOV) August 2, 2026 New York Daily News shared further: The SAFE for Kids Act requires that social media companies obtain parental consent before granting young people under 18 access to algorithmic feeds and push notifications between midnight and 6 a.m.. Algorithmic feeds have been shown to keep users on platforms for longer by using personal data to serve unlimited content customized to them. New York officials say the feature may drive “unhealthy levels of social media use” that ultimately harm young people’s mental health, according to a news release from the governor’s office. If a parent denies permission, the platform will automatically revert to a chronological feed of posts shared by people the child already follows, resembling social media apps before the rise of algorithms. Young people will continue to have access to search functions. The law is slated to take effect January 25, 2027, with the rules that will govern compliance now in place. “The SAFE for Kids Act leads the nation in keeping our children safe online and protecting youth from the devastating effects of unchecked social media. These rules set standards for age verification and parental control to ensure tech companies are doing their part to keep kids safe on their platforms,” New York Attorney General Letitia James said. “Young people are particularly vulnerable to addictive social media features, and my office is committed to protecting all New Yorkers from potentially harmful technologies and companies that try to take advantage of them,” she added. “New York’s final SAFE for Kids rules landed. To keep an algorithmic feed, or notifications after midnight, every adult in the state has to prove they’re an adult. That means a government ID, a face scan, or a phone number cross-checked against data already held on you,” Reclaim The Net stated. New York's final SAFE for Kids rules landed. To keep an algorithmic feed, or notifications after midnight, every adult in the state has to prove they're an adult. That means a government ID, a face scan, or a phone number cross-checked against data already held on you. The AG's… https://t.co/9HjMY8eChK — Reclaim The Net (@ReclaimTheNetHQ) August 3, 2026 Reclaim The Net explained further: The law is written for under-18s but, as always has to be the case, the age-checking reaches everyone. To keep an algorithmic feed or overnight notifications, a user above 17 has to prove to the platform that they are an adult. Confirming who counts as an adult means collecting government IDs, face scans, phone numbers and email addresses from people who until now typed a birth date and moved on. James rejected the privacy objection to all this. The rules are “not a question of privacy,” she said. Platforms can accept a government-issued ID upload and the rules force them to offer at least one other option. James’s office also lists a selfie image or video, or an email address or phone number cross-checked against other data that is held on a person. Any of those hands a company something it can tie to a real identity. It’s clear that the law isn’t shying away from allowing platforms to collect sensitive user data, including biometrics, and allowing cross-referencing against other data. For minors, the default changes. Instead of a personalized feed, users under 18 see posts from accounts they follow in a set sequence such as chronological order, unless a parent consents to the algorithm version. The post Residents In Blue State To Soon Face Social Media Restrictions Without Age Verification appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.