Tina Peters has been reportedly assaulted in prison… And to add insult to injury, it’s now being spun as though she were the aggressor. Unreal. Watch here and scroll down to read the full video transcript if you can’t have your sound up: This is bullshit! Tina Peters deemed the aggressor in an assault that took place against her and now faces Felony Assault Charges Tina was inside a maintenance closet to fill up a water unit when an inmate approached her in the closet and began striking her in anger. Tina… https://t.co/typJUsJfkZ pic.twitter.com/Gd7wg5HPl3 — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) January 20, 2026 TRANSCRIPT: Speaker 1: Play it. Sure. So here, you can see Tina is performing, essentially, porter duty, and she’s bringing this, it’s a unit, a cooling unit, over to this maintenance closet so that she can fill it up, because there’s a water reservoir. So you’ll see her open the door to this closet and bring the unit in there. When she opens the door, she is pulling the unit in to make sure it’s clearing the door. So in a few seconds, you will see the inmate walk up to the door. Tina’s head is between that unit and the door closest to the camera. Right here, the unit approaches and starts saying, “You’re disrespecting me.” And right before she comes out, you can very clearly see that the inmate lunges in. She is pushing off of her back foot and striking at Tina. So Tina tried to calm the situation down. She pushed her out. Her left arm was restraining the inmate’s right hand that she was striking her with, and the other arm was pushing her back. Once she calmed down, Tina disengaged and walked away. So they’re trying to say that this was an assault, and that Tina was clearly the aggressor. But truly, it’s just an unfortunate camera angle, and the news is going to do exactly what they always do. They’re going to try to paint Tina as the aggressor and discredit her, especially on the heels of the very damning, in many ways, appellate hearing that just happened regarding her prosecution. Speaker 2: Okay. Um, let’s so tell me about the appellate hearing about the prosecution. This is where Polis has talked about some sort of clemency, because of the over-the-top nature of the charges and what her sentence was. Now you’re at an appellate court. Take a second to walk through that. Speaker 1: Well, I mean, Polis said that the sentencing was extreme. Anyone with a pulse and IQ over 50 could tell you that, given what happened in the case. But very serious issues were raised by the appellate judges. In their own words, they described very clearly the jury being misinstructed, charges being read to the jury and presented in court as misdemeanors but charged as felonies. The Colorado attorney tried to defend the idea that you could be tried on one charge and convicted on another if the charges fit. There were First Amendment issues and Tina’s inability to speak to her intent, which is important because it is not only part of the felony charge and part of the language, but also because it was included in sentencing that Judge Barrett used to sentence her. It was used concurrently to this massive sentence. So there were multiple issues raised in that appellate hearing that should constitute a mistrial. RELATED REPORTS: BREAKING: Colorado Appears Ready To Fold, Grant Tina Peters Clemency MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH For Tina Peters As Appellate Court SHREDS Prosecutor The Tina Peters case has come before an Appellate Court and let's just say the judges do NOT look amused at the gross errors seemingly committed by the State Prosecutors. In essence, the State somehow charged Tina Peters with a misdemeanor, used misdemeanor jury instructions, and then somehow later on shifted that into a felony and sentenced her to the maximum under the felony. You don't need to Antonin Scalia to see the problem here! "GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE" does not even begin to summarize what happened here. And while the Appellate Court seemed extremely baffled and annoyed with the State's position, I am also wondering what culpability the Trial Court Judge has in this miscarriage of justice. How did that judge allow this to happen? Was all of this just one big accident or was it malicious? The Appellate Judges even say at one point in the questioning: "You know you don't have to take this position" -- pointing out how absurd it is, and basically saying "stop digging the hole" -- to which the State Prosecutor smiles in defeat, almost admitting that she does have to take this position by whoever she is taking orders from. Also, how old is this State Prosecutor?  She looks like she's 13!  And she looks woefully unprepared for any of these questions! Watch here: TRANSCRIPT: Appellate Judge: Do you— is it your position that a person can still be convicted of a crime with which they were never charged, and with which the jury was never instructed, as long as the evidence is sufficient? State Prosecutor: Yes. I think that that is what the case law indicates, that if the— it's just and in this case, I'll just point out too, that, you know, I don't have the language of the hypothetical, you know, the statutes that you're citing in your hypothetical, but it was one word, "might," and it was already— Appellate Judge: Yeah, but that one word distinguishes it from a felony to a misdemeanor. And this case made an extra sentence, 15 more months in the Department of Corrections, that couldn't have been given had it been a misdemeanor conviction. It clearly affects a substantial right. And I'll just say, I'm confused as to why the people are continuing to maintain that the proper remedy on this isn't to enter the conviction for the misdemeanor, because the indictment used the word might, and the jury was instructed on that, so that's what the verdict is. I am baffled as to the position that's being taken, that we can somehow overlook that and still enter the felony, because the evidence that was presented at trial would have supported the felony. Are you still maintaining that position in front of us here today? State Prosecutor: Yes, that is our position, but— Appellate Judge: What case law supports that argument? State Prosecutor: I'm sorry? Appellate Judge: What case law supports that argument? State Prosecutor: Um, I cited it in my brief. I don't have it right in front of me, but the case— it's usually the omitted elements case law, right? Appellate Judge: Yes, correct. But that's just where the element was omitted, and the element that was omitted wasn't in dispute. Here, the jury was affirmatively misinstructed. It was instructed on the misdemeanor, and it found her guilty of that misdemeanor beyond a reasonable doubt. This isn't the omission of an element. This is a misinstructed jury. How can we correct that by saying, "No, we'll just assume that because she could have also been convicted of the felony, we enter that even though we don't have a jury verdict." State Prosecutor: That is— I understand it's a difficult position for the people to be in. But— Appellate Judge: It's not a position you have to take. State Prosecutor: Thank you. But I do believe that the omitted element language applies, because it— to me, I understand, you know, I can hear from the way you're talking about it that it seems more egregious to add this extra word than it is to omit an element. But to me, omitting an element is a pretty big deal. And the fact that that can be non-reversible— Appellate Judge: Except in those cases, at least the person was originally charged with the elemental language. Here, never on the table. State Prosecutor: That is true, but if I can just add— and again, it seems that I will not be able to convince you, but I just want to put my argument out there, which is that there was no— there wasn't a confusion from the parties about what they were talking about. Because the correct statutory citation was used, so they were on notice of that statutory citation. The language was incorrect, but the statutory citation was correct, and they— Appellate Judge: Couldn't that also mean that the prosecution was on notice that since the language was correct, they'd only charged that language and not— State Prosecutor: Well— Appellate Judge: I mean, both of them were on notice of something wrong. State Prosecutor: Oh, yes. I guess what I'm saying, Your Honor, is just that there wasn't a notice problem, because there was the statutory citation. And the parties treated it as though— I think it was an oversight. I think everybody believed that they had charged and used the language for the felony. That's what the record bears out, in my estimation. Great summary here: pic.twitter.com/hkbj3VsTvyUPDATE: Tina Peters — Insane! Appellate Judges Grill Prosecutors Over "Baffling" Error: Tina Peters Convicted on Felony Charges despite using Misdemeanor Jury Instruction Language - A judge asks point-blank if it's acceptable to convict someone of a… — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) January 15, 2026 UPDATE: Tina Peters — Insane! Appellate Judges Grill Prosecutors Over "Baffling" Error: Tina Peters Convicted on Felony Charges despite using Misdemeanor Jury Instruction Language - A judge asks point-blank if it's acceptable to convict someone of a crime they weren't charged with or instructed on, as long as evidence supports it; the prosecutor affirms "yes," leading to visible judicial confusion and pushback, with one judge stating, "I'm baffled at the position that's being taken." - The jury was instructed using "might" (misdemeanor language implying potential liability) instead of the felony requirement of actual liability, resulting in an extra 15 months in prison; judges emphasize this isn't a mere omission but an affirmative misinstruction, questioning why the remedy isn't simply entering a misdemeanor verdict. This egregious error represents prosecutorial misconduct or a fundamental due process violation, and is potentially grounds for overturning the conviction entirely or declaring a mistrial. RELATED REPORT: BREAKING: Colorado Appears Ready To Fold, Grant Tina Peters Clemency I just brought you this report, explaining how the strike in Venezuela just changed everything -- literally -- on the world stage. Russia and China and all the nations trying to partner with them were all caught completely flat-footed. The speed and precision President Trump is moving at is dizzying and no one can keep up.  More importantly, no one can predict what he will do next. And he might do ANYTHING next, as he has quite clearly just shown the world: Incredible New Details Emerge About “Next Gen Weapons” Used By USMIL In Venezuelan Operation He gave Maduro many warnings before snatching him out of his bed in the thick of night, but when he moved it was swift and over in less than 3 hours. A sovereign nation a hemisphere away with Maduro bunkered up in a fortress protected by his Royal Guard because they knew a strike was eventually coming soon, and they were powerless to stop it. Now in the wake of that move, everyone else who President Trump continues to warn is realizing these are not blanket threats and if they don't want to be "Maduro-ed" next, they had better change their course ASAP. Even Colombian dictator Gustavo Petro has seemingly bent the knee and is coming to met with President Trump soon in Washington, DC: President Trump Confirms Future Meeting With Gustavo Petro, Here’s When In light of all of that, what is another group of people President Trump keeps warning? The Blue State Governors who refuse to stop the killings in their cities, who refuse to stop the billions upon billions of fraud, and who are actively at war with the Federal Government and ICE agents. President Trump keeps telling them he will soon invoke the Insurrection Act and clean up the whole mess. You think swooping in and cleaning up fatass JB Pritzker is going to hard in light of what we did to Venezuela?  Walk in the park! How about gay (literally) Jared Polis?  You think he's going to put up any resistance when the USMIL Delta Force knocks on his door? Folks, the jig is up and even these Blue State Democrat Governors look like they might be finally folding. Because a defiant Jared Polis, the (gay) Governor of Colorado, who has repeatedly been defiant about never releasing Tina Peters from prison is suddenly changing his tune: ?Colorado Governor Jared Polis is considering clemency for Gold Star Mother Tina Peters#FREETINAPETERS In a recent interview with CBS Colorado (aired January 8-9, 2026), Polis described Peters' nine-year prison sentence as "harsh" and indicated that his office is reviewing… https://t.co/a0k1Nl0Ur8 pic.twitter.com/ogJS0wpi7D — Tony Seruga (@TonySeruga) January 10, 2026 CBS News confirms the reports are true after speaking to Polis: Gov. Jared Polis says he has an ambitious agenda for his final year in office. He's been full throttle since he was elected governor seven years ago, leading the state through COVID-19, two school shootings, and four of the most destructive wildfires in Colorado history. "It's hard to sprint. You sprint for 8 years, and that's always the way we've approached it. Our team -- we say we're running through the tape. We're running through the tape here," he said. As he nears the finish line, he is not only focused on the state budget and issues like affordable housing, but also which state prisoners should receive clemency. Among those who have asked the governor for a reduced sentence is former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters, who was convicted of several felonies in connection with a 2020 election fraud scheme. "She got a sentence that was harsh. It was a 9 year sentence. So we always look at people's sentences. And when you have people that are elderly, and we're looking at this across a number of many people -- people in their 70s or 80s in our system -- how much of a threat to society are they and how do we balance that in a way that makes sure they can spend their last year few years at home." President Trump asked the governor to transfer Peters to federal authorities last year so he could pardon her, but Polis refused and Trump pardoned her anyway, but because she was charged in state court she remains imprisoned. Trump has since blocked funding to Colorado for needy families, disaster relief and clean water. Of course Tina Peters was NEVER a threat to society, so even now he is being disingenuous -- but it's a move in the right direction. Tina Peters is an American hero who should receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom and go down in the history books as a true hero and not sleeping on the floor in some dirty prison. FREE TINA NOW! What’s your take?

At least 22 people died and 15 others sustained injuries after a raging elephant caused destruction through several towns in eastern India. Locals reportedly “climbed trees” and “slept on rooftops” to avoid the elephant in its 10-day rampage, the New York Post noted. The chaos began on New Year’s Day when the elephant killed a 35-year-old man in the village of Bandijhari in Jharkhand’s West Singhbhum district. Rogue elephant kills nearly two dozen people in 10-day rampage through eastern India https://t.co/Uze1UZf82V pic.twitter.com/LuCqE48k9s — New York Post (@nypost) January 20, 2026 More from the New York Post: Four days later, the animal killed five members of the same family in the nearby town of Sowan. The next day, it killed five more people in Babaria, including a married couple and their two children, the Times of India reported. The elephant moved mostly at night and covered as much as 25 miles a day, thwarting repeated attempts to tranquilize it, according to forest officials. The animal is believed to be in a state of musth — a natural but dangerous hormonal condition in male elephants marked by a surge in testosterone that can last weeks or even months. During musth, bulls become extremely aggressive, restless and unpredictable, often roaming long distances and attacking without warning. In the hardest-hit villages, nightfall brought panic, with residents refusing to sleep indoors and instead perching on rooftops or in trees, keeping watch for the sound of breaking walls or footsteps as the elephant roamed the forest edge. Some officials reportedly think the bull is in its mating phase. Search teams are still racing to contain the rampaging elephant before it kills again and causes further havoc in the area. TMZ shared footage of the wild elephant: A killer elephant — who is at-large — has left a total of 22 people dead over a 10 day period in India. Details: https://t.co/Q3njFcHsgJ : TIM pic.twitter.com/NzXY48gI4d — TMZ (@TMZ) January 19, 2026 TMZ shared further: Officials completely lost control of the situation — botching attempts to capture and tranquilize the animal. It all comes after they briefly drove the elephant into neighboring Odisha … only for local staff to force the killer elephant straight back to Chaibasa over safety concerns. Even specialist teams from other towns were rushed in to help … but they couldn’t stop it either, with one expert fatally injured while trying to manage the elephant.

Remember a few months ago, when Mayor Jacob Frey went out to eat Somali food with the local Somali leaders is a disgusting attempt to pander to the Somalians only to look like he wanted to BARF after taking the first bite? I do. HILARIOUS: Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Looks Like He’s About To BARF As He Tries To Eat Somali Food That may go down in history as one of the worst choices ever made as the walls (Walz?) around him seem to be crumbling. Looks like he may have forced down that Somali slop for no payoff after all as news has just broke today that the FBI has officially served the Governor's office and the Mayor's office with federal subpoenas: ? BREAKING: The FBI has officially served Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Frey with SUBPOENAS in the criminal investigation into them conspiring to impede ICE operations It’s about to get REALLY bad for these two soyboys. LOCK THEM UP! ? pic.twitter.com/iTLiLWoa02 — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) January 20, 2026 Of course we should remind everyone that in America everyone is innocent until proven guilty, but there does seem to be a lot of smoke building in Minnesota. Fox News confirms: Sources told Fox News that the Department of Justice served grand jury subpoenas on Tuesday to five Minnesota government offices — including the Governor’s Office, the Attorney General’s office and the Minneapolis Mayor’s Office – as part of a federal investigation into alleged conspiracy to coerce or obstruct federal law enforcement during ongoing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operations in Minnesota. The sources said the FBI served the subpoenas, seeking records and communications. The Justice Department declined to comment on the matter. Fox News learned late last week that federal prosecutors were investigating both Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for allegedly impeding law enforcement efforts. U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche told Fox News the duo's anti-ICE rhetoric was teetering on a federal crime. "When the governor or the mayor threaten our officers, when the mayor suggests that he's encouraging citizens to call 911 when they see ICE officers, that is very close to a federal crime," Blanche said. Walz responded to the news by accusing the Trump administration of "weaponizing the justice system." CBS News labels it as an official FBI investigation into Walz and Frey: The Justice Department is investigating Minnesota officials, including Gov. Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, over an alleged conspiracy to impede federal immigration agents, an extraordinary escalation in the Trump administration's clash with Democratic leaders there, multiple sources familiar with the matter told CBS News. One of the sources, a U.S. official, said the investigation stems from statements that Walz and Frey have made about the thousands of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and Border Patrol agents deployed to the Minneapolis region in recent weeks. Subpoenas are likely to be issued in the probe, sources familiar with the matter told CBS News. A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment. RELATED REPORT: HILARIOUS: Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Looks Like He's About To BARF As He Tries To Eat Somali Food Oh my goodness, this had me dying laughing! And I ALMOST felt sorry for this guy, but then that feeling passed real quick.  Because you don't get to sell out one of America's once great cities and engender any sympathy from me.  Not gonna happen.  You made your bed, now lie in it! And in this case, that bed is rotten from the inside out, just like their disgusting food. Which is what Jacob Frey just found out. I've watched this on loop for about the past 10 minutes and it just keeps getting better. Watch his face! We all know that face. We've all MADE that face. That's the face you make when you're holding on for dear life trying like crazy not to barf out what you're currently eating. LMAO! Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey is holding on for dear life while dining in a Somali restaurant just to "stick it to Trump." This is peak level pandering. pic.twitter.com/OUXnIyMsWT — Ryan Fournier (@RyanAFournier) December 5, 2025 Another view here: Minnesota Mayor Jacob Frey chows down on Somalian SLOP in front of the cameras and visibly looks like he wants to throw up…. TAKE THAT TRUMP! lol pic.twitter.com/7eqbJtYmml — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) December 5, 2025 And then you're gonna think this next one is fake AI, but it's not. It's real. And as one person said in the comments, it's Cringe Level 11: Does Jacob Frey know that he’s a white man and not actually Somalian? pic.twitter.com/aCSsSeMb5l — Dr. Jebra Faushay (@JebraFaushay) December 6, 2025 You made your bed Frey, hope you are enjoying sleeping in it. PUKE! I'll end with something funny....DEFINITELY reminds me of this: Jacob Frey eating Somali food reminds me of this. https://t.co/B1nRCRcgZo pic.twitter.com/mRiaDKyJJQ — MAZE (@mazemoore) December 5, 2025 RELATED REPORT: Minnesota “Teacher of the Year” Sentenced To 14 Years In Prison For SexAbuse Of 14-Year Old "The ones you trust the most" Once again, a Teacher of the Year has made the news for all the wrong reasons. Abdul Wright, from Hennepin County, Minnesota, has just been found guilty of repeatedly grooming and sexually abusing a 14-year old girl, even in the school classroom! To give that even more context, we're talking about an 8th Grader here. Sicko! ? WOW. Somalian in Minnesota who was "Teacher of the Year" was sentenced to 14+ years in prison for S*XUAL ABUSE of one of his underage students. Abdul Wright gro*med an eighth grader. They ALL need to go back to Somalia. Every last one.pic.twitter.com/NMya9CKCyy — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 4, 2025 Local Fox9 reports the Judge also determined he lied under oath in the Courtroom: The student testified during the trial how the sexual abuse lasted for nearly a year and took place on multiple occasions, including inside the classroom. Wright was named the Minnesota Teacher of the Year for 2016. He started sexually abusing the student the following year, according to court records. "I think that his status and him being Teacher of the Year really was a reason that a lot of people turned a blind eye," the student previously told the FOX 9 Investigators. She described the relationship as "manipulative" and "grooming." Evidence introduced during the trial included multiple gifts or tokens of affection, including a charm bracelet with an infinity symbol and the words "forever friends." Prosecutors also questioned Wright about hundreds of calls with the student, which the family told the school about years ago. "A phone record that was insane – it was all time of day, all time of night," the student’s father told the FOX 9 Investigators. "All of his behavior was hiding in plain sight." One of the most consequential pieces of evidence was an incriminating phone call between Wright and the student’s mother where Wright appeared to admit to the abuse. "I aint never did no [expletive] like that before and I thank God this morning when I didn’t have the police at my door," Wright said during the recorded call. What they're saying: In her written verdict, Judge Sarah West said that recording helped prove Wright lied on the stand when he claimed his innocence. "It appeared to this court that Mr. Wright was lying during his testimony and truthful during the record[ed] call," Judge West said. Watch more here: Credit to the Judge who hit him with the maximum time in prison allowable under the standards.  From local MPRNews: A judge on Friday handed a 14-year sentence to a former Minnesota Teacher of the Year convicted of sexually abusing one of his students. ... West sentenced Wright to 172 months, the top of the guidelines range for a person with no previous criminal history convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct. Under Minnesota law, Wright must spend two-thirds of that time, or 9 and a half years, in prison before he’s eligible to serve the remainder of his term on supervised release. West also ordered Wright to register as a predatory offender. Two things immediately come to my mind... First, as the X post above states, he looks to be Somalian in heritage and he's living in Minnesota so that puts the odds very high, although I have researched and been unable to confirm that. But if he is Somali, it looks like President Trump was right again -- these Somalis are GARBAGE and we need to get every last one of them who complains about being here the Hell OUT of our Country! President Trump Unloads: “Ilhan Omar is GARBAGE!” Second, it's a really bad time recently for "Teachers of the Year". Remember this? WATCH: “Teacher of the Year” Going Viral For All The Wrong Reasons! Too Far? Oh my goodness.... A former "Teacher of the Year" is suddenly going viral online for all the wrong reasons. She instituted what many believe is an EXTREME spanking on her son for allegedly not cleaning up around the house. The brother filmed it because he was scared, the video got out, and now she's under investigation. Watch here: Responses are split about right down the middle with some people like AlphaFox saying "kids today would never have lived through the 1960s" and feeling like the reaction is far too serious: https://x.com/alphafox/status/1991587640601375099?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg While others think she should be fired from her job and arrested: https://x.com/libornormal/status/1991480509910904866?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg Nicole Staples, teacher at Cottage Hill Christian Academy, has been fired and arrested after a viral video allegedly showed her hitting a child with a belt more than 20x, yelling obscenities at a boy for not finishing his chores. Alabama pic.twitter.com/JQYvmkzpjp — Orietta Rose (@0riettaRose) November 20, 2025 Your thoughts? Did she go way too far or society is just soft now? And I can't help but immediately think of this other video we recently covered that is very similar.... Do you view these differently or the same? Boy Caught Smoking Weed, Gets The Ultimate Punishment — Too Much or Good Parenting? A video is going viral of a boy caught smoking weed and getting some serious punishment from his father who was not at all amused. And let's just say it's driving a lot of controversy... I would say 80% of the responses I saw thought it was good parenting and would save this child from a life spiraling downward. Meanwhile, about 20% thought it was excessive or that it should not have been shared online. Curious to know what you think.... Watch here: Backup video here if needed: https://x.com/lashybills/status/1984517395856167200?s=46&t=fQPc05aE4Kkb738_xetJBg Here is a sampling of some of the comments: Curious to know what you think.... Good parenting or excessive? Add your response down below in the comments. I couldn't help but also be reminded of this similar report from a while back: BUTT WHOOPED: Do We Need More Of This In America…Or Was This Too Much? Ok folks, need your opinion on this. This is going absolutely viral and it's splitting people about 50/50 right now the middle. Kind of like how this kid got "split down the middle" by a whoopin! So let me explain... The story goes that this kid stole pants from the man with the belt, and the community decided to "police its own". Actually, the guy who had his property stolen asked the kid if he'd rather go home to his mother or get a whoopin'. The kid choose the whoopin'. Watch here: https://twitter.com/DailyNoahNews/status/1647045336249126914 [Censored] And a backup copy here: https://twitter.com/detectfights/status/1643660313852510223 [Censored] And in case Twitter is blocking those, I have a backup for you saved on Rumble: So....I need to know what you think. Was this too much? Over the top? Or actually exactly what we need in America! A little more consequence for bad behavior! Get a bruised ass for a couple days but learn a lesson that lasts a lifetime. What do you think? Drop me a comment below and let me know which side you're on. Share! Your thoughts?

If you do not like “Conspiracy Theories” tune out now! Actually, that’s not entirely fair….because what I’m about to show you is not a Conspiracy Theory of any kind — it’s actually 100% true and historically confirmed by multiple sources. What you choose to make of it could send you down a conspiracy rabbit hole, but that’s up to you. I’m just reporting on what is true and I think this might just blow your mind. It turns out that over the last 75 years, there have been TWO very prominent “Erika Kirks” in our Country. Ok big deal, right? Oh I’m just getting started… They both spell their name with the unconventional Erika with a “k”. They both married a C. Kirk. The C. Kirk they both married were both active, popular, powerful, political conservative figures. The first Erika Kirk was initially so secretive she was referred to by the name “Madame X”. And…they look almost identical! See for yourself right here: Backup video here if needed: THIS IS WHERE THE ERIKA KIRK STORY GOES FROM WEIRD TO DISTURBING The woman in this video is connecting the dots… Two women named Erika Kirk, separated by 54 years.Same exact name. Same exact spelling – Erika with a K.Both political wives. Both married to outspoken… pic.twitter.com/5Kb0DqKIKI — HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) January 20, 2026 So now let’s dig in….that’s wild but is it true? Actually, yes it is! Grok confirms: Summary of Factual Findings Yes, the core factual claims in the X post are accurate based on public records and obituaries: there were indeed two women named Erika Kirk who were married to prominent Republican figures named Claude Kirk and Charlie Kirk, respectively, with a 54-year gap between their births. Both were blonde political spouses involved in conservative circles, and online discussions (including the post itself) highlight visual similarities from side-by-side photos, though these are subjective and not indicative of anything beyond coincidence. There’s no credible evidence supporting conspiracy theories like cloning or “manufacturing,” which appear to stem from viral speculation amid heightened political tensions in 2026. Details on the First Erika Kirk Full Name and Background: Erika Carola Mattfeld Kirk (née Mattfeld) was born on July 7, 1934, in Bremen, Germany. She was an international model and actress before marrying Claude Roy Kirk Jr., Florida’s Republican governor from 1967 to 1971. She was often referred to as “Madame X” in media coverage due to her mysterious allure and sudden appearance in Claude’s life during a blind date in Brazil. Marriage and Role: They married in March 1967 at Bethesda-by-the-Sea in Palm Beach, Florida, shortly after Claude took office. As Florida’s First Lady, she was known for her glamour and involvement in social events. The couple had two children together (Claudia and Erik) and blended families from prior relationships. Later Life and Death: She resided in Palm Beach County for over 50 years and passed away on April 26, 2023, at age 88 in West Palm Beach. She was buried at South Florida National Cemetery alongside Claude, who died in 2011. Details on the Second Erika Kirk Full Name and Background: Erika Lane Kirk (née Frantzve) was born on November 20, 1988, in Scottsdale, Arizona. She grew up in a Catholic family, played collegiate basketball, and won the Miss Arizona USA title in 2012, competing in Miss USA that year. Marriage and Role: She met conservative activist Charlie Kirk in 2018 during a job interview at a New York City burger restaurant, began dating in 2019, and married him on May 8, 2021. They had two children: a daughter born in 2022 and a son in 2024. Following Charlie’s assassination in September 2025, she became CEO and chairwoman of Turning Point USA, the organization he co-founded. Current Status: As of 2026, she hosts the Midweek Rise Up podcast, runs a clothing line called PROCLAIM, and is pursuing a doctorate in Biblical studies at Liberty University. On the Similarities and Speculation Visual and Biographical Parallels: Both women share the name “Erika Kirk” (with the less common ‘K’ spelling for Erika), were married to outspoken Republicans involved in politics or activism, and are described as having similar appearances (blonde hair, blue eyes, strong facial features). The X post’s video includes side-by-side images that emphasize these traits, which have fueled online discussions. Some users point to additional coincidences, like German heritage (the first Erika was born in Germany; the second has Germanic roots via her maiden name) and arranged first meetings with their husbands. Conspiracy Theories: Claims of “cloning” or the situation feeling “manufactured” (as in the post) are unsubstantiated and appear in fringe online narratives, often linked to broader skepticism about political figures. No mainstream sources support such ideas; it’s more plausibly a case of doppelgangers or random coincidence, as everyone has look-alikes statistically. Recent Context: The viral post from January 20, 2026, has garnered significant engagement (over 218,000 views), with replies mixing awe, dismissal, and numerological theories (e.g., birth date calculations tying to Charlie’s birthday). This echoes other recent online buzz, like comparisons between Charlie Kirk and figures like JD Vance. Again, I’m not telling you what to do with this information, and I’m not saying it proves anything beyond just being super weird and highly unlikely! You will have to make of it what you will. I did ask Grok what are the odds of this happening by random chance and it places them at 1 in 10,000 or maybe as high as 1 in 100,000, depending on how you frame it: Key Baseline Frequencies (from reliable sources like 2010 U.S. Census and SSA data) Surname Kirk: Ranked around 600–700 in frequency. Roughly 0.02% of the U.S. population (about 1 in 5,000 people) carries Kirk as a last name. For adult men (potential husbands), it’s similar—call it ~1 in 5,000. First name Erika (spelled with ‘k’): Moderately common but not top-tier. For women born in the 1930s (older Erika): Less common then, but it rose later. For women born in the late 1980s (younger Erika): Peaked in popularity in the 1980s–1990s, roughly 0.3–0.8% of girls born in those decades (top 100–200 range at peak). Overall lifetime: About 1 in 2,800–3,000 U.S. women/females are named Erika (from cumulative SSA estimates of ~115,000–120,000 bearers). Rough Probability Calculation Probability a random American woman marries a man named Kirk: Assume ~half the population is male → ~1 in 10,000 women marry a Kirk (adjusting for marriage patterns; people often marry within similar demographics, but we ignore that for baseline randomness). Real annual U.S. marriages: ~2 million per year recently, historically ~1.5–2 million in the 1960s–2020s era. Now for two unrelated Erikas, decades apart, both marrying Kirks: Treat it as two independent events (they are unrelated people). Probability one Erika marries a Kirk ≈ 1/10,000 (very rough). For two such cases: (1/10,000) × (1/10,000) = 1 in 100 million — but this understates because it doesn’t account for the total number of Erikas and marriages over time. Better approach: Expected number of such coincidences There are roughly 100,000–120,000 women ever named Erika in the U.S. (SSA cumulative). Assume ~70–80% marry at some point → ~80,000–100,000 married Erikas historically. Fraction who marry a Kirk: ~1/5,000 to 1/10,000 (using surname frequency, adjusted slightly lower for marriage selectivity) → expect 8–20 Erikas in U.S. history who married a man named Kirk purely by chance. Seeing exactly two high-profile ones (both in conservative/Republican spheres) out of those ~10–20 possible is unusual but not astronomically rare—more like 1 in several thousand to 1 in tens of thousands when factoring the extra filters (prominent public figures, similar appearances, etc.). Adjusting for the Full Coincidence (Name + Spouse Surname + Political Context) The raw name match (Erika Kirk) happens a handful of times per generation by chance. Layering on both husbands being outspoken Republicans/conservative figures (small subset of all Kirks) makes it rarer—perhaps dividing by 100–1,000 (very few “famous Kirks” in politics/activism). Visual doppelgänger effect and 54-year gap amplify perceived weirdness, but don’t change base probability. Best estimate of odds for this exact pairing occurring by pure chance in U.S. history: 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 100,000 (for the full observed coincidence, including the political prominence and timing). In other words: Unlikely enough to feel eerie (especially with the side-by-side photos), but far from impossible—more like winning a minor lottery prize or having two people in your extended social circle share an ultra-specific trait. This is similar to birthday-paradox-style coincidences: In a nation of 330+ million over decades, with millions of marriages, weird alignments happen regularly. No evidence points to anything orchestrated; it’s just statistics producing a striking “small world” moment. If we narrow it further (e.g., only blonde, politically active Erikas marrying high-profile Kirks), odds drop to 1 in millions—but that’s hindsight bias cherry-picking the filters after seeing the match. Random chance remains the simplest explanation. The last time I openly asked “what are the odds” in relation to Charlie and Erika Kirk was this one: Charlie Kirk “Snake Eyes” UPDATE Yesterday, I brought you this really strange (but fact-checked 100% true) report about the impossible-to-believe connections between Charlie Kirk and the 1998 Nicolas Cage movie "Snake Eyes". If you haven't seen that yet, you can see my full report here and no exaggeration this honestly will blow your mind: This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk — How Is This Even Real? And while there are too many "coincidences" in there to believe are just random chance, there's actually one more that I missed. Hat tip to my friend MJTruth who caught it. It turns out that in the 1998 movie, a plot element is a Hurricane named JEZEBEL striking the New Jersey coast. Take a look here: UPDATE: Charlie Kirk — It just got weird… The 1998 movie Snake Eyes is about a corrupt cop, who uncovers a conspiracy surrounding a political assassination at a public heavyweight boxing event. In the movie, Charles Kirkland, the Secretary of Defense, was assassinated by a… pic.twitter.com/V0Z8ZjVO3L — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 25, 2025 UPDATE: Charlie Kirk — It just got weird… The 1998 movie Snake Eyes is about a corrupt cop, who uncovers a conspiracy surrounding a political assassination at a public heavyweight boxing event. In the movie, Charles Kirkland, the Secretary of Defense, was assassinated by a gunshot to the neck. Charlie Kirk Charles Kirkland The assassination of Charles Kirkland in the movie took place in September. But wait… it gets even weirder. In the film, the heavyweight fight who “Took the Fall”, is named Lincoln TYLER, who allowed the assassin to get away, drawing parallels to TYLER Robinson, who is believed to be the fall guy. Don’t leave just yet, it gets even weirder Part of the movie was shot at the Trump Taj Mahal Hotel & Casino, in Atlantic City. Gilbert Powell—the sleazy arena director and defense contractor is explicitly noted as a character based on Donald Trump. Gilbert Powell was part of the plot to orchestrate the assassination as part of a conspiracy involving a missile defense system deal. In the movie, Dunne confessed that the trip to Norfolk was for a test of the AirGuard missile defense system, which Powell's company was backing. He deduces that the sniper, a known Palestinian terrorist named Tariq Rabat, who was protesting weapons shipments to Israel, learned of the test and assassinated Kirkland in order to stop the sale of the system to the US government. Also notable, throughout the film, a Hurricane named JEZEBEL strikes the Atlantic City coastline. —— this is also notable given that we just learned that a popular website named Jezebel allegedly worked with an Etsy witch to cast a curse/Vex on Charlie Kirk. That is just weird… Ok, so that's it right there at the end. If you didn't catch it, allow me to connect the dots for you. Last week, we were one of the first to bring you reports that a group of Witches on Etsy were paid to put a curse on Charlie Kirk just days before his assassination. That report was confirmed yesterday by Megyn Kelly: UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Witchcraft Confirmed So, what's the connection to Jezebel? A far-left website called Jezebel.com proudly bragged about how they had paid the Witches on Etsy to "curse" Charlie Kirk. So there's your JEZEBEL connection folks! I am seriously asking you, how many "coincidences" does it take before it becomes statistically impossible? I think wherever that line is, we have crossed it. That's just my opinion. And allow me to address the Witchcraft issue, because I've seen all of your emails and complaints about the fact that I covered this story. I want to address two things on this point... First, for those of you emailing me saying Witchcraft is not real and I shouldn't be talking about fake, made-up stuff like that, I'm sorry but the Bible disagrees with you.  I'm not following it or promoting it, but the Bible does make very clear that it's very real and we are to avoid it: Old Testament Exodus 22:18 — “You shall not permit a sorceress to live.” Leviticus 19:26 — “You shall not eat anything with the blood, nor practice divination or soothsaying.” Leviticus 20:6 — “If a person turns to mediums and familiar spirits, to prostitute himself with them, I will set My face against that person and cut him off from his people.” Leviticus 20:27 — “A man or a woman who is a medium or who has familiar spirits shall surely be put to death.” Deuteronomy 18:10–12 — “There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. For all who do these things are an abomination to the Lord.” 2 Kings 9:22 — “...the harlotries of your mother Jezebel and her witchcraft are so many.” 2 Chronicles 33:6 — [Of Manasseh] “Also he caused his sons to pass through the fire in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom; he practiced soothsaying, used witchcraft and sorcery, and consulted mediums and spiritists.” Micah 5:12 — “I will cut off sorceries from your hand, and you shall have no soothsayers.” Nahum 3:4 — “Because of the multitude of harlotries of the seductive harlot, the mistress of sorceries, who sells nations through her harlotries, and families through her sorceries.” New Testament Acts 8:9–11 — Simon the sorcerer “astonished the people of Samaria, claiming that he was someone great… they heeded him because he had astonished them with his sorceries.” Acts 13:6–8 — Elymas the sorcerer opposed Paul and Barnabas. Acts 19:19 — Many who had practiced magic brought their books and burned them publicly. Galatians 5:19–21 — Witchcraft (sorcery) is listed among the works of the flesh: “Now the works of the flesh are evident: adultery, fornication... idolatry, sorcery... those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.” Revelation 9:21 — “And they did not repent of their murders or their sorceries or their sexual immorality or their thefts.” Revelation 18:23 — “For by your sorcery all the nations were deceived.” Revelation 21:8 — “But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers... shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone.” Revelation 22:15 — “But outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie.” Ok, so that's the first thing. Second thing, for everyone emailing me to say a Christian like Charlie Kirk cannot be cursed by Witchcraft, I'm not entirely sure that is true.  The Bible makes very clear that on this Earth we are engaged in a spiritual war.  And in war there are casualties.  If being a Christian gave you a magical cloak where nothing bad could ever happen to you, that would be nice but it's not what the Bible (or life experience) teaches us. But either way, whichever way you believe on that topic, that's not the point of my reporting.  The point of my reporting is that this event happened and it's very disturbing.  And according to Megyn Kelly, Charlie and Erika were aware of it and were very disturbed themselves, calling close trusted friends in for prayer. Those are the reports directly from Megyn Kelly.  I'm just the messenger.  Believe whatever you want to believe, but the Jezebel / Etsy / Witchcraft Curse timeline did happen.  Make of it what you will. Here was my original report in case you missed it: This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk -- How Is This Even Real? If you do not like "Conspiracy Theories" tune out now! Actually, I take that back.  That's not fair. What I'm about to show you is not a Conspiracy Theory of any kind.  What I'm about to show you is simply FACTS that I have fact-checked myself and found to be 100% true. The conclusion you want to draw after hearing these facts is up to you. Sound good? Ok, let's dig in because I am about to completely blow your mind. Do you remember the 1998 movie "Snake Eyes" starring Nicolas Cage? It was a great movie, and in fact in hindsight Nicolas Cage has put out a ton of iconic movies. Ever seen "Matchstick Men"?  Such a great and underrated movie! But back to "Snake Eyes"... This movie, released in 1998 (when Charlie Kirk would have been 5 years old), features all of the following: A politician named Charles Kirkland (gee, kind of sounds like Charlie Kirk doesn't it?) Charles Kirkland is assassinated Charles Kirkland is shot in the neck The assassination happens on September 10th (Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10th) There is a boxer in the movie named Tyler whose nickname is "The Executioner" For those of you into such things, the names "Tyler Robinson" and "Lincoln Tyler" in reverse ordinal gematria both total 165 Oh and it's currently the Chinese Year of the ..... Snake (Snake Eyes) I will document each of these things down below to show you it's fact-checked 100% true, but for now just watch this: There are NO COINCIDENCES. The 1998 Movie "Snake Eyes" with actor Nicholas Cage, the politician CHARLES KIRKLAND is shot in the neck. In the movie, the shooting happens on SEPTEMBER 10th. Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck, in real life on September 10th. You just can't make… pic.twitter.com/zNiqchI4mK — The SCIF (@TheSCIF) September 24, 2025 TRANSCRIPT: There's a movie called Snake Eyes, which came out in 1998, and in that movie, U.S. politician Charles Kirkland is assassinated at a live event by a shot through the neck. Charles Kirkland, like Charles Kirk, and obviously Charlie Kirk was also shot in the neck allegedly, right? Well, in the movie Snake Eyes, the heavyweight boxer Lincoln Tyler is in the ring during the assassination. Tyler, like Tyler Robinson, and in gematria, Lincoln Tyler is 165, like Tyler Robinson is 165, and his nickname is The Executioner, okay? Well, the big part here, guys, in the movie Snake Eyes, the assassination occurs on September 10th. Charlie Kirk was allegedly assassinated on September 10th. Can you believe this, guys? You guys gotta share this with everyone you can. This is undeniable. And also see how Nicolas Cage is doing the hands like Charlie Kirk, also Donald Trump does that hand sign, and also we're in the Year of the Snake right now. It's called Snake Eyes. But wow, just, you put that all together — Charles Kirkland shot in the neck, Lincoln Tyler equals Tyler Robinson, and you're telling me the assassination in the movie happened on September 10th, the same day the Charlie Kirk event happened? Oh my goodness. And guys, I can't take credit for this. Um, shout out to Bernard Suarez, or Bernardo Suarez, sorry. Um, he left me this comment. I also saw him on the Ball Don’t Lie channel earlier tonight talking about this. He said, “Have you ever watched the '98 movie Snake Eyes where the character Charles Kirkland is assassinated with a shot in the neck, and there's a boxer named Tyler who has the nickname Executioner?” And then Decoding With Cody let me know that the shooting in the film is on September 10th. Backup video here if needed: This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk -- How Is This Real? pic.twitter.com/9oau2mIQb2 — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 24, 2025 Ok, now let me document and fact-check this for you. Let's start with the name, Charles Kirkland -- this is a pretty easy one to confirm: You can also confirm all of these by simply watching the movie too, by the way.  It's available on Paramount+. Notice how I am not asking ChatGPT leading questions... Next up, the assassination is confirmed -- it happens in the opening scene and forms the basis for the rest of the murder-mystery plot: Notice how ChatGPT does not know the September 10th date, but it's a good thing I'm smarter than these AI robots! You can still count on Noah to get the job done even when ChatGPT fails! In the opening scene, the camera very intentionally flashes to the marquee which confirms two things: the boxer name TYLER THE EXECUTIONER (note how TYLER is even emphasized) and the date of September 10th is clearly visible: That freeze frame is a LITTLE hard to read the 10th (could argue it's the 18th) but in the video it's pretty clear it's the 10th. You can watch the video here: Backup here if needed: Snake Eyes (1998): Opening Scene pic.twitter.com/cViTGeYwmQ — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 24, 2025 If that's not enough, you can confirm all of this in the written script that you can read on Scribd: Now the shot in the neck... Here's a screenshot of Charles Kirkland getting shot in the neck in the movie -- almost the EXACT identical same spot as Charlie Kirk: And it's not really my thing, but for those of you interested in this stuff, here is the Gematria name-value confirmation as well: And of course you know there's always going to be symbolism, right? How about flashing the "All Seeing Eye" in the air the moment before the shot rings out? Ok, now to steal a phrase from Steve Jobs and Columbo: "One more thing..." Remember what the tagline was from that movie? "Believe everything except your eyes." Wow. Look, I'm not saying I believe all of this proves it was fake and staged and Charlie is still alive....I'm not going there.  I'm just saying at what point does all of this become too much to be a coincidence? I'll let YOU answer that! I told you I was only going to report facts and that's what I did. What you do with this information is up to you... All just one big coincidence? I find that almost impossible to believe, but I am interested to hear your thoughts below! Noah out.

Meet Danish member of parliament Anders Vistisen, a very charming guy who seems unable to communicate anything other than telling President Trump to “Fuck off!” How nice! As usual, it’s a sign of low IQ, but Anders doesn’t seem to care. That was the message he delivered to European Parliament one year ago today on January 22, 2025, see here: And since that went so well one year ago, he decided to deliver the same line again today. He must really think this is creative and cool? Watch here: JUST IN: Americans are mocking Danish MEP Anders Vistisen after he told President Trump on Greenland – “Let me put this in words you might understand: Mr. President. F*CK OFF!” This weasel wouldn’t even have a country without America’s defense spending. TRUMP WILL ONLY… pic.twitter.com/hX6dfB4Ov5 — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 20, 2026 I love how the European Parliamentarian guy who enforces the rules basically has to break in to his speech and tell him that’s not acceptable behavior. His tone and body language basically say “I know we have really low standards around here, but this is unacceptable even for us!” Hilarious! I love how these are the people who think they have the moral high ground over us….what a joke! How can you tell you’ve already won the debate? When the other side only has this left. It’s over. And Greenland will be owned by the USA by Midterms at the latest.