A California voter-roll record allegedly listed a woman named Doris as 126 years old with a history of voting in 51 elections. Then Nick Shirley went to the address on camera. The woman at the door gave a very different answer. According to Shirley and The Gateway Pundit, Doris said the information was wrong and told Shirley she was born in 1940. That would make her roughly 86 years old, not 126. Meet Doris, she lives in California and is registered as a 126 year old who has voted in 51 elections and has NO IDEA. California’s voting system is so corrupt that by simply knocking on the door of the “126 year old” proves election fraud. EXPOSE IT ALL. pic.twitter.com/5WEaFKem3P — Nick shirley (@nickshirleyy) June 7, 2026 The Gateway Pundit reported that Shirley was checking voter-roll entries for people listed over the age of 100. In the video, Shirley tells Doris that the record says she is 126 years old. TGP’s transcript shows Doris pushing back, saying it was the wrong information and telling Shirley she was not “100-some years old.” Shirley also told her the record said she had voted in 51 elections. Her answer, according to the transcript: “No, not me.” The 126-year-old figure and the 51-election count come from Shirley’s video and TGP’s report. That distinction matters because the voter-file entry is being shown through Shirley’s reporting, not through a separate public state lookup. The question Shirley raises is still direct: how does a voter-roll record like that appear in a system that is supposed to be maintained and checked? California Secretary of State explains what VoteCal is supposed to do: VoteCal is California’s centralized voter registration database that provides benefits to voters and election officials. VoteCal maintains all of the voter registration information for all voters in all 58 counties. “List maintenance” is the process VoteCal uses to ensure their voter registration lists are up to date and accurate. County elections officials use VoteCal to check for duplicate registrations, move a voter’s record from one county to another when the voter moves, check registration records to ensure voters have not been convicted of a crime that would preclude them from voting, and much more. VoteCal performs many functions, including interacting and exchanging information with many other state and county information systems. Voter registration applications and existing voter records are run against the CDPH database. Any applicant who is confirmed to be deceased is not registered to vote and any existing registrant who is confirmed to be deceased has his or her voter registration cancelled. VoteCal has been implemented to provide a single, uniform, centralized voter registration database that meets applicable Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 requirements. VoteCal’s many functions improve services to the voters of California by: Connecting the Secretary of State and all 58 county elections offices together to improve the voter registration process; Providing a publicly available website which allows voters to register online; Providing a single, official statewide database of voter registration information. That is the system on paper: centralized, statewide, maintained, and checked. A record allegedly showing a living 86-year-old as a 126-year-old voter with 51 elections logged is the opposite of that promise. One door knock does not prove statewide fraud by itself. It does show why voter-roll maintenance is not a side issue. If the record Shirley displayed is wrong, then the next question is simple: how many more records are wrong, and who is responsible for fixing them before ballots go out? Doris says the information was wrong. California says VoteCal keeps the lists accurate. Both claims deserve scrutiny now. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

Spencer Pratt has fallen to third place in the race for Los Angeles mayor, and that drop now puts him outside the current top-two runoff. The latest Los Angeles County results show incumbent Karen Bass in first, city council member Nithya Raman in second, and Pratt sitting just behind in third. For days, Pratt had been fighting Raman for that second slot. The newest ballot drops flipped it. Raman now leads Pratt by 3,113 votes for the runoff position. Spencer Pratt is now OUT of contention for the LA Mayor’s race. Nithya Raman won 1st in the latest ballot drops— Never in election history has the 3rd place contender SURGE like this. This is such utter bullshit, it’s laughable. https://t.co/V1J09XAHQq pic.twitter.com/yozZK8xBRm — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) June 8, 2026 Here is what the official Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk results page currently shows: Results as of 06/07/2026 19:24:46. Results are representative of Los Angeles County only. Remember to refresh this page to ensure that you have the latest results. LOS ANGELES CITY PRIMARY NOMINATING ELECTION Mayor Candidate(s) Votes Percent KAREN RUTH BASS (N) 250,871 34.68% NITHYA RAMAN (N) 196,198 27.12% SPENCER PRATT (N) 193,085 26.69% ADAM MILLER (N) 26,531 3.67% RAE CHEN HUANG (N) 20,822 2.88% JUANITA LOPEZ (N) 11,555 1.60% ANDREW K. KIM (N) 6,403 0.89% SUZY KIM (N) 5,327 0.74% ASAAD ALNAJJAR (N) 3,637 0.50% BRYANT ACOSTA (N) 3,081 0.43% JOHN LOGSDON (N) 2,738 0.38% TISH HYMAN (N) 1,404 0.19% ANDREJ A. SELIVRA (N) 1,030 0.14% NELSON CHENG (N) 790 0.11% Bass holds first with 250,871 votes and 34.68 percent. Raman has 196,198 votes and 27.12 percent. Pratt has 193,085 votes and 26.69 percent. The same official feed lists 741,793 ballots counted in the mayor contest, with 725,075 candidate votes and 1,603 write-ins. These are current unofficial returns. The count is not finished, and the results are not yet certified. That is why the wording matters here: Pratt is out of the current runoff position, and if these standings hold, he is out of the November race. Conservatives are raising questions about the direction of the late-count movement, and the official numbers tell that part of the story plainly. Associated Press reported the race was still too early to call on Sunday, while also noting that Raman had moved into second place behind Bass for the first time since voting ended Tuesday. AP also reported that Raman has gained more votes than Pratt with every update Los Angeles election officials have provided since Tuesday. AP estimates a little less than 150,000 ballots are still left to be counted. The remaining count still matters. The margin between Raman and Pratt is roughly 3,100 votes, and there are tens of thousands of ballots still outstanding. But if the current standings hold through the remaining count and certification, Pratt misses the top-two runoff for mayor of Los Angeles. That would leave Bass and Raman on track for November, while the outsider candidate who shook up the race gets pushed out by the late count. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

News is spreading fast that the US might have plans to acquire the strategic island chain in the Indian Ocean which includes Diego Garcia. According to the report currently spreading like wildfire, President Trump is considering an outright purchase of the island chain. I want to be very up front — there is no response to this report so far by anyone willing to go publicly on record from the Trump Administration… besides “multiple Trump Administration officials” quoted in current news media. Here’s the story as it is being reported. It is no secret that the military base on Diego Garcia is one of the largest and most globally strategic bases the US operates. The UK, which ‘administers’ that island chain, is set to potentially lose control over the island by letting their full control lapse; maintaining a flimsy lease situation, at best. That’s a thin thread to hang a vitally strategic military asset. And so President Trump has consistently pushed against anything that would increase the chances the US loses that base. The President came out swinging against the direction the UK was heading with the island chain back in January, with this statement via his Truth Social account: Here’s the full text of that statement from President Trump for easier reading: Shockingly, our “brilliant” NATO Ally, the United Kingdom, is currently planning to give away the Island of Diego Garcia, the site of a vital U.S. Military Base, to Mauritius, and to do so FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER. There is no doubt that China and Russia have noticed this act of total weakness. These are International Powers who only recognize STRENGTH, which is why the United States of America, under my leadership, is now, after only one year, respected like never before. The UK giving away extremely important land is an act of GREAT STUPIDITY, and is another in a very long line of National Security reasons why Greenland has to be acquired. Denmark and its European Allies have to DO THE RIGHT THING. Thank you for your attention to this matter. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP Not long after, with the German Chancellor sitting with him in the Oval Office… President Trump basically roasted the UK’s Prime Minister for the cameras over the issue. Here’s that clip from March of this year: WOW! President Trump just RIPPED INTO the UK for going FULL WOKE and attempting to force the US out of one of our most important bases, Diego Garcia “This is NOT the age of Churchill. I will say, the UK has been very, very uncooperative with that STUPID ISLAND they have… pic.twitter.com/hgnajfHjdg — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 3, 2026 Now, multiple outlets are reporting that the White House has a plan in place to circumvent the UK’s apparent intention of losing full control over the island. The plan to purchase the entire island chain is being covered in part by Reuters: The White House is considering a plan to buy the Chagos Islands from Mauritius, the Telegraph reported on ​Sunday. U.S. offcials have drawn up a proposal to bypass the U.K. ‌and make their own deal to take control of Diego Garcia, the report said. The plan is among several options being drafted by the White House, in a paper aimed at providing alternatives ​to British Prime Minister Keir Starmer ceding sovereignty of the Indian Ocean archipelago ​to Mauritius, the report said. “President Trump has been consistent in his position ⁠that the United Kingdom should not give away the British Indian Ocean Territory, ​which includes our joint U.S.-UK military facility on the Diego Garcia atoll,” a U.S. ​official told Reuters. “Diego Garcia’s strategic location in the Indian Ocean makes it a vital and indispensable military installation of significant importance to the national security of the United States,” the official said, ​adding the U.S. remains in regular discussions with Britain to preserve the island’s viability ​as a regional security platform. (Emphasis added.) As that anonymous Trump Administration official was quoted as saying in the previous article, the Trump Administration has consistently maintained the strategic importance of our base on Diego Garcia. And just before the interaction in the Oval Office I showed you in the previous video… President Trump dropped another Truth Social post making it clear just how upset he was with the UK’s Prime Minister for putting control of Diego Garcia in a sketchy position. Here’s the full text of that social media post from February of this year: I have been telling Prime Minister Keir Starmer, of the United Kingdom, that Leases are no good when it comes to Countries, and that he is making a big mistake by entering a 100 Year Lease with whoever it is that is “claiming” Right, Title, and Interest to Diego Garcia, strategically located in the Indian Ocean. Our relationship with the United Kingdom is a strong and powerful one, and it has been for many years, but Prime Minister Starmer is losing control of this important Island by claims of entities never known of before. In our opinion, they are fictitious in nature. Should Iran decide not to make a Deal, it may be necessary for the United States to use Diego Garcia, and the Airfield located in Fairford, in order to eradicate a potential attack by a highly unstable and dangerous Regime — An attack that would potentially be made on the United Kingdom, as well as other friendly Countries. Prime Minister Starmer should not lose control, for any reason, of Diego Garcia, by entering a tenuous, at best, 100 Year Lease. This land should not be taken away from the U.K. and, if it is allowed to be, it will be a blight on our Great Ally. We will always be ready, willing, and able to fight for the U.K., but they have to remain strong in the face of Wokeism, and other problems put before them. DO NOT GIVE AWAY DIEGO GARCIA! The President was so enraged at the prospect that the UK Prime Minister would simply “give away” Diego Garcia that he forgot to include his signature line of “Thank you for your attention to this matter” in that Truth Social post! The UK’s apparent disregard for the President’s warnings about losing control of that base has led us here… With one of the “multiple sources” being cited pinpointing the idea as originating from the President’s Treasury Secretary, as is being reported by The Independent: The president has repeatedly threatened to seize or annex several nations and territories, including Canada and Venezuela, which he has potentially claimed as 51st states. His latest alleged plan follows delays in U.K. legislation that would complete the country’s cessation of the territory to the east African nation Mauritius after withdrawal of U.S. support in January. Trump called the treaty organizing the cessation of territory “an act of GREAT STUPIDITY” at the time. The Telegraph reports that a plan to buy the territory, placing it directly under U.S. control, is among the options being presented to Trump as he makes a decision on further steps for the Chagos Islands, which consist of dozens of islands in the Indian Ocean. Multiple sources familiar with the matter told The Telegraph that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent directly raised the idea with the president, though it was reportedly not Trump’s “leading” option at this time. The White House did not comment on The Telegraph’s reporting when contacted byThe Independent. Like Greenland, the Chagos Islands are viewed as a strategic military asset due to U.S. military bases on the islands. (Emphasis added.) Back in January, a British journalist attending a White House press briefing asked him what had changed to cause him to be so adamantly against the UK’s plans for the island chain. In his response, the President emphasized that earlier conversations about the plans for Diego Garcia in particular entailed something more akin to ‘ownership’. Here’s the President in January of this year, answering that question: WATCH: TRUMP SAYS UK MUST “KEEP” DIEGO GARCIA Trump says Britain should not lease or sell Diego Garcia and questions why the UK would even consider it. “They were talking about ownership… now a lease and selling it – I’m against that. Do they need money?” Trump sees what… pic.twitter.com/G88P1Ms1CF — British Intel (@TheBritishIntel) January 20, 2026 Although the President details that Diego Garcia isn’t quite as critical as Greenland in terms of strategic importance… He expressed in that clip — once again — that the UK’s plans to relinquish control fly in the face of logic. At least, it does if your logic takes into account the current geopolitical instability in the world. Even a former official who worked for the previous foreign secretary of the UK seemed awestruck that the UK would let the highly advanced capabilities housed on that island become potentially snuffed out. That’s according to the outlet that is responsible for setting off this story to begin with, The Telegraph: The war in Iran and China’s rising naval power have reignited calls to maintain a global chain of strategic military bases. Diego Garcia’s location would put Iran within striking distance and allow for round-the-clock, long-range bomber missions, such as the strike on Tehran using B-2 Spirit stealth bombers. Accordingly, senior members of Mr Trump’s administration fear that handing control of the water to China-allied Mauritius would open the door to espionage by sea. Officials have in recent months highlighted the Chagos Islands’ importance, stressing top-secret capabilities. Ben Judah, David Lammy’s former special advisor when he was foreign secretary, told The Telegraph this year: “This airbase…has super secret, super sensitive facilities there which are so important to what Britain is able to do in the world. “The moment you understand what it is, you come into the British deep state’s logic, which is that we must retain access to this thing at all costs. We would never be able to replicate if we had to do it all by ourselves.” A price for the Chagos Islands has not yet been discussed. Britain initially planned to give the islands to Mauritius and then pay around £35bn ($46.7bn) for 99 years to lease back the military base. To take control of the islands, Washington would first have to allow Sir Keir’s deal to go through, then negotiate with the Mauritians once sovereignty had been transferred. (Emphasis added.) I’d like to draw your attention to the last sentence in the excerpt I sourced from The Telegraph’s story. That’s the key here, as far as I can tell. In a nutshell, the alleged plan (at least as it is being reported) would entail a process by which the US allows the UK’s relinquishing of control over the island chain to happen. And then, without UK involvement, the United States would make a deal to purchase the territory outright from Mauritania — who would at that point hold control over the island, and could legitimately sell the territory without asking the UK’s permission. You only have to go back and hear how President Trump described the importance of that American base to track why he is incredibly fixated on that dot in the Indian Ocean. President Trump warned back in February he may be willing to maintain control over Diego Garcia by military force if needed, according to reporting at the time from Fox News: President Donald Trump has warned that the U.S. could use military force to secure the Diego Garcia air base in the Chagos Islands if any future deal threatens access to the joint U.S.-U.K. installation. Trump made the comments Thursday in a Truth Social post while also signaling his willingness to move past tensions with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer after what he described as “very productive discussions” about the Indian Ocean base. Emphasizing the base’s strategic importance, Trump said the role of Diego Garcia was essential to U.S. national security. “It is the site of a major U.S. military base, strategically situated in the middle of the Indian Ocean and, therefore, of great importance to the national security of the United States,” Trump wrote. Again — I want to be very clear that I can not independently verify at this time the reporting by these outlets. The story rings true in my ears, and tracks with President Trump’s previous statements concerning the island base — and also overlays perfectly with his approach to Greenland… for example. He follows a fairly consistent recipe for making a deal. He first articulates the strategic importance, expresses a willingness to use military force if need be, and then leverages those two components towards a desired deal which usually includes a potential PEACEFUL financial transaction. That’s classic Trump deal making! Still, the plausibility factor alone isn’t enough to validate the TRUTH of these reports. This is the story being pushed, and while the Trump Administration hasn’t confirmed those reports… They haven’t denied them yet, either — even though the outlets reporting on this alleged plan have reached out to the White House. I’m going to keep this one tentatively on the “developing” side of things, as I look for confirmation from the White House. And we’ll be sure to let you know one way or another the validity of this alleged plan to purchase Diego Garcia when more details emerge, either verifying or disproving the current reporting. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

The fake news is now brazenly defending the (alleged) election fraud happening in California. To give you a quick rundown of what’s been going on in the LA Mayor race, Spencer Pratt was solidly in second-place to Karen Bass on Election Night, with Nithya Raman trailing behind in third. But, as Election Day turned into days, flood after flood of mail-in ballots have come in. And, they have not been favorable to Spencer Pratt. Now, at this point, he’s only barely beating out Nithya Raman and may not advance at all. We covered the latest in the race here: Spencer Pratt’s Lead Over Progressive Nithya Raman Nearly Vanishes After Latest Ballot Drop /*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js One ballot dump this week had exactly zero votes for Spencer Pratt. Not just a few in the batch, which honestly would be suspicious in and of itself. No. There was not even a single vote for Pratt in the tens of thousands of ballots that flooded in from that drop. Social media posts, like this one, pointed out the extremely sketchy election update when it happened: PROOF OF CHEATING IN CALIFORNIA. Notice that Karen Bass and Nithya Raman each increased by about 10,000 votes, but Spencer Pratts number stayed the EXACT SAME. So, in over 20K votes cast, Spencer didn't get ONE. This is IMPOSSIBLE. The fix is surely in. pic.twitter.com/YAgNssszOY — Mila Joy (@Milajoy) June 4, 2026 If that’s not clear-cut evidence of something fishy going on, then I don’t know what is. In fact, it’s statistically impossible for such a thing to occur. But, the Los Angeles Times is now trying to explain why this happened. They are pinning the blame on a convenient “glitch” in the system and telling everyone that it is absolutely not proof of fraud. According to the news outlet, Spencer Pratt actually did get more votes during that ballot drop. But, they did not get processed immediately due to a “lag” in the system. From the Los Angeles Times: Since election night in California, a single theory of election fraud has taken root like no other among online conspiracy theorists, bot accounts, conservative influencers and people close to President Trump. It proved to be a simple misreading of the voting data. Late on election night, an update of vote counts in the Los Angeles mayor’s race appeared on election results pages of various media outlets including the Los Angeles Times. It showed leading Democrats Mayor Karen Bass and Councilmember Nithya Raman receiving tens of thousands of new votes, and leading Republican former reality TV star Spencer Pratt receiving no new votes. Some observers of the vote tally immediately took screenshots, with some shouting fraud. Others ran statistical analyses that showed it would be impossible for a candidate such as Pratt — running second in the race — to receive zero votes in such a large batch of ballots. In fact, the update that showed zero Pratt votes was followed one minute later by another update that showed tens of thousands of votes for Pratt, and none for Bass or Raman. There was no batch of votes that included zero votes for any candidate, as Los Angeles County’s own data show plainly. But the claim fit into the broader, false narrative being pushed relentlessly by Trump and other Republicans in recent days, that California Democrats were cheating. Voting data pushed out by the Associated Press came as two separate updates one minute apart, with Bass’ and Raman’s votes in the first and Pratt’s in the second. “The AP vote count receives updates as provided by election officials and adds them to our vote count. What happened in this case is that there was a lag in an automated update such that some candidates’ votes were added in one update and the other candidates followed about a minute later,” the Associated Press said in a statement to The Times. “Specifically, an electronic update from the Los Angeles County website pulled in votes for only one group of candidates, including Karen Bass and Nithya Raman. Exactly one minute later, the electronic update picked up the votes for another group of candidates including Spencer Pratt. Taken together, the updates included 21,870 votes for Pratt, 12,850 votes for Bass and 9,521 votes for Raman, along with votes for other candidates.” The Times’ election results page relies on the AP’s data feed, and checks for updates once a minute. According to a Times review of election night results data, The Times pulled data from the AP’s feed at approximately 8:35 p.m. that included 0 new votes for Pratt and eight other candidates. When The Times’ system next checked for new numbers a minute later, there was an update with votes for Pratt but no new votes for Raman, Bass and others. The LA Times also put out a video to assure everyone that “conspiracies” about election fraud are totally baseless and explain the apparent glitch in more detail. Watch here: Here we go, the Los Angeles Times is admitting that yes, tens of thousands of mail in ballots did get processed for only Mayor Karen Bass and Nithya Raman but it was “a glitch” They say the system just “glitched” for a minute and didn’t process any ballots for Spencer Pratt but… pic.twitter.com/MswgINgu4l — Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) June 7, 2026 Here we go, the Los Angeles Times is admitting that yes, tens of thousands of mail in ballots did get processed for only Mayor Karen Bass and Nithya Raman but it was “a glitch” They say the system just “glitched” for a minute and didn’t process any ballots for Spencer Pratt but really there were ballots for Spencer, they just didn’t get processed during the “glitch” No, we don’t believe you. This is fraud and Democrats are cheating “It was the result of a lag in an automated collection of the data in which there was one data collection that captured votes in a single batch of votes for Bass and Raman, and then about 1 minute later, the collection of the rest of that same batch of votes — Folks I spoke to also said there is no fraud. But again, there was no batch of votes without any Pratt votes. There was sort of a 1-minute variation between the upload of Bass and Raman votes and Pratt votes on some media websites. Officials and others who have reviewed the data say that is not any proof of fraud. There was no fraud.” Again, yeah right. We need a federal audit into California elections What do you think? Are you buying this explanation? This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

Multiple people have been injured in a terrifying stabbing at Penn Station in New York City, NY. Five victims have been hospitalized after an “emotionally disturbed” man went on a rampage, stabbing people seemingly at random. Law enforcement responded quickly and apprehended the suspect, whose identity has not been released yet. Take a look at the horrific scene: BREAKING: 3 people reportedly stabbed at Penn Station in NYC. : @bjntweets pic.twitter.com/7DceXLcl19 — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 7, 2026 BREAKING: FIVE PEOPLE STABBED at NYC Penn Station in NJ Transit area. One person is in custody. Video by @L2FTV | Licensing @FreedomNTV Desk@freedomnews.tv pic.twitter.com/5bw9ToCKGN — Oliya Scootercaster (@ScooterCasterNY) June 8, 2026 NBC New York provided the latest update on the situation: Five people were injured following a stabbing in New York’s Penn Station, according to a law enforcement official. One person, believe to have mental health issues, was taken into custody by Amtrak police, according to a senior law enforcement official. The criminal investigation is in its early stages, but the official said there appears to be no signs of terrorism. The exact conditions of the five people injured was not immediately known. This incident comes just one day before President Trump is scheduled to attend the Knicks game at Madison Square Garden. Extra security precautions will be put into place for President Trump’s attendance at the game. Daily Mail noted: The stabbing comes just 24 hours before the New York Knicks face off against the San Antonio Spurs for the third game of the NBA finals at Madison Square Garden, located directly overhead from the transit hub. President Donald Trump and Mayor Zohran Mamdani are both set to attend the game. As a precaution, hundreds of US Secret Service officers and agents will be deployed at the Garden on Monday, joined by thousands of NYPD personnel in what law enforcement sources are calling a ‘heightened security posture’ unlike anything seen at an NBA game. A hard closure is expected around the entirety of Madison Square Garden – one of the busiest corners of Midtown Manhattan – with entire city blocks effectively placed under lockdown for the duration of the event. No vehicle access and no pedestrian travel will be permitted through the secured perimeter, a sweeping restriction that will affect not just fans but anyone trying to get around that part of Manhattan on a Monday evening. Only ticketed fans will be allowed anywhere near the building, and even they will face screening more akin to airport security than a typical night at the Garden. No bags will be permitted inside – not purses, not backpacks, not totes of any size. Fans have been warned in no uncertain terms to leave everything at home or face being turned away at the checkpoint. We’ll continue to bring you any further updates on the NYC stabbing as they come in. Please pray for the victims. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.