100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed

100 Percent Fed Up Feed

@100percentfedupfeed

If You Think Chemtrails Are Just a “Conspiracy Theory”, Just Watch This…
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

If You Think Chemtrails Are Just a “Conspiracy Theory”, Just Watch This…

I’m not sure how much clearer we can make it, but I’ll keep trying…. Chemtrails are real. They are spraying heavy metals in the sky above you. I know that’s a tough pill to swallow, but we report the truth here. I’ve been telling you for years. Here’s the latest, see with your own eyes folks: WOW For everyone who still thinks “cloud seeding” weather modification is just a conspiracy theory Here you go: They’re showing you exactly how it works, custom installed switches in the planes and then showing the chemicals being activated and sprayed into the air and we… pic.twitter.com/PRTUyMKSXP — Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) February 18, 2025 And if that’s not enough, how about President Trump literally telling you to your face? President Trump Now Exposing Chemtrails? President Trump Now Exposing Chemtrails? Well, it looks like it's time to retire another "Conspiracy Theory" and move it over into the "Conspiracy FACT" bucket. The only problem is, my Conspiracy Fact bucket is getting awfully full these days!  Might need to get a bigger bucket! For years, I've warned you about the toxins they're spraying in the skies above us! And for years, I would say about 25% of the population has had severe cognitive dissonance on the topic. Each time I write about Chemtrails, about 25% of the comments I get are angry.  I mean, really angry!  Irrationally angry! And look, I get it. To admit that for decades now our Government has been spraying our skies with toxic heavy chemicals and metals, it's almost too much to take in. So some people don't take it in....they refuse to accept it's real, claim it's not happening. "Those are just CON trails Noah, condensation trails from water vapor made by planes at high and cold altitudes!" "Wise up, Noah, take off your tin foil hat!" I've heard it all. Except now even President Trump is trying to tell you... Watch this: Is Trump actually talking about chemtrails on national television?? pic.twitter.com/1HhQlA3SeD — HustleBitch (@HustleBitch_) February 21, 2025 Backup here: “There’s something Wrong - Maybe it the SPRAY - we SPRAY all over the place” Noway is Trump talking about what I think he’s talking about? pic.twitter.com/1dTzVRRdMA — Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) February 21, 2025 He always does this.... On these big topics where he knows the public will not be able to take it all in at once, he slowly starts leaking out a new idea and that's exactly what he did here. Just a short little throwaway line, but he's planting the seed. I have no doubt you'll start to hear a lot more from President Trump about this soon, ultimately resulting in full disclosure. And then I hope he truly gets to the bottom of this and shuts it down! Because it's literally killing us. And to all the people who are going to write in the comments section of this article that "it's just water vapor Noah, don't be so dumb" well...all I can say to you is I don't know why they'd literally be passing new laws to ban something that doesn't exist: JUST IN: Tennessee Senate Passes Bill Banning Chemtrails But it's not just the laws and it's not just President Trump.... RFK Jr. has been very clear and outspoken on the dangers of chemtrail spraying: RFK, Jr.: “We Are Going To Stop The Crime of Chemtrails!” RFK, Jr.: "We Are Going To Stop The Crime of Chemtrails!" Sometimes it just feels like EVERYTHING is coming together.... President Trump's team is surging.... RFK has endorsed and joined... We're going after vaccines and autism.... Election integrity issues being addressed in several swing states.... Illegal voters being purged from the voting rolls.... And now the latest -- we're even tackling chemtrails! Until just a few years ago, most believed chemtrails were not even real. But we've been shouting about them from the rooftops and it looks like our hard work is finally paying off! Perhaps RFK, Jr. is a WLTReport reader? I wouldn't be surprised! Because he just posted this online: BREAKING: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says “we will stop the crime” of “chemtrails.” — Leading Report (@LeadingReport) August 26, 2024 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Responed to this video by saying “we will stop the crime” of “chemtrails.” RFK Jr. is likely to persuade Trump to push through federal legislation banning chemicals in the sky. pic.twitter.com/1OUpVLTiMS — Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) August 26, 2024 Here is his actual post, which was a reply to a nasty chemtrails video: We are going to stop this crime. — Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) August 26, 2024 And here is a screenshot in case that Tweet gets deleted or censored: Now, for anyone who is here and doesn't think chemtrails are real, let's do a little education lesson! Here's the difference between CONtrails and CHEMtrails: OMG RFK Jr. Just announced the Trump Unity Administration will stop the CRlME of Chemtrails THIS IS HOW WE MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY LET’S GO pic.twitter.com/Ao3NGl15KV — Marjorie Taylor Greene Press Release (Parody) (@MTGrepp) August 26, 2024 You do know it's been widely ADMITTED, right? Dubai Admits It: Chemtrails and "Cloud-Seeding" Are Real, Here's How We Do It! I've been telling you for a long time that "Chemtrails" are real. Many of you are awake and you see it too. But there's always a vocal minority that wants to (loudly) argue with me.... "Those are just CONtrails, you're so stupid!" "No one is spraying anything into the sky!" "Airplanes have always done this..." "That's just a normal condensation trail..." "The sky looks normal to me with all these long lines and checker board patters in it!" Those are the most common refrains of people who don't want to admit it. Others get violently and emotionally angry with me for even discussing it, and still others refuse to even talk about it in the first place because their cognitive dissonance is so strong. But the fact of the matter is they are real and obvious to anyone with eyes to see.  Just look up! And now it's not only being admitted but fully exposed.... Check out this new video from Dubai where they proudly brag about their "cloud seeding" operations and even show you the planes that do the spraying! Watch: Dubai spent $20 million on cloud seeding and to make it rain on demand #WeatherModification @JayneJ07 @garfybloom @Chemtrail101@alex_meechan @Elizabe32413720#GeoEngineering @WeatherGirlofLA @birgittasauer1 @JoshWhoX @Gp1ggy1 pic.twitter.com/WUCDJkQOCs — DELTA 9 (@DELTA9_DELTA9) February 10, 2024 Backup here if needed: Dubai admits CHEMTRAILS or what they like to call them ("cloud seeding") is real. Watch below.https://t.co/TcQMi5DNHx pic.twitter.com/QY3l17aWXg — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) February 13, 2024 More here from the USA: Here's how states across the West are using sliver iodide to make it rain @garfybloom @alex_meechan @birgittasauer1 @Gp1ggy1 @JoshWhoX @WeatherGirlofLA @Chemtrail101 @JayneJ07 @Elizabe32413720 #GeoEngineering #WeatherModification pic.twitter.com/Tuyx7ifh1t — DELTA 9 (@DELTA9_DELTA9) February 10, 2024 Here's what Grok told me: The UAE's National Center of Meteorology (NCM) has conducted numerous cloud-seeding operations in the past. In 2023, the NCM launched a month-long cloud-seeding campaign to improve technologies used to boost rainfall across the country. However, it is essential to note that weather patterns and government initiatives can change over time. To get the most accurate and up-to-date information, it is recommended to consult with the local meteorological agency or government sources for the latest details on any cloud-seeding operations in Dubai. And this: "Cloud seeding" is indeed a real thing. It is a weather modification technique used to increase precipitation by introducing substances, such as silver iodide or dry ice, into clouds. This process aims to enhance the cloud's ability to produce rain or snow. Cloud seeding has been practiced for decades and is currently used in various regions worldwide to address water shortages and drought conditions. Gee, spraying silver iodide into the sky....what could go wrong? No doubt other heavy metals as well... More here: “Legacy Media” Now Tacitly Admitting Chemtrails? "Legacy Media" Now Tacitly Admitting Chemtrails? We've been covering Chemtrails for many years here at WLTReport... So I know what kind of reactions I will get each time I publish this type of article exposing the truth behind the Chemtrails. A large group of you are awake and have eyes and know that what is happening in the skies above you is NOT normal... Another fairly large group of people suffer such extreme cognitive dissonance every time the topic is brought up that they either completely shut down and can't/won't process it, or they become violently and emotionally angry and lash out at me for even raising the issue. So I know we'll get both camps in the comments to this article and in my email Inbox. But here's what's a little different this time, and what will cause even more distress on the second group of people: the "Legacy Media" aka the MSM is now starting to admit it. It's called "soft disclosure" and they're paving the way for it to become public knowledge that yes, the Government has indeed been spraying heavily metals in the air for all of us to breathe in for years now. You see, the Government knows what I know....they know about the second group of people. They know that eventually this truth will come out -- it has to, one way or the other -- but if it comes out in a big surprise burst, that second, fairly large, group of people will not be able to handle it. So they do a "soft disclosure" and they gradually and softly boil the frog ever so slowly. Here's the latest....this is NPR starting to get the idea out there to the normies who can't deal with this topic: Dane Wigington @RealGeoEngWatch let's add this from NPR a potential climate solution in the works reflecting sunlight back into space yes by all means let's avoid looking up and just keep pretending that climate engineering hasn...https://t.co/NEsWSdFObvhttps://t.co/3I2Q3fzuEj pic.twitter.com/4ZGcXOdYmV — Dudly Mohr (@dudly_mohr) December 17, 2023 And here's my screenshot to show you it's real: Here's an excerpt from that NPR interview: AYESHA RASCOE, HOST: With leaders from around the world gathered in Dubai for the U.N. climate summit, we wanted to discuss an idea that might sound more like science fiction than science. Could humans cool the planet by reflecting sunlight away from Earth? It's called solar geoengineering, and it is something that scientists are working on, even if we don't hear much about it. Peter Irvine is a climate scientist and teaches at University College London. Welcome to the program. PETER IRVINE: Thanks for having me. RASCOE: So can you give us a better sense of what solar geoengineering is? IRVINE: Solar geoengineering, yeah, as you said, describes a set of ideas to increase the amount of light that the Earth reflects back to space. And that could counter the warming effect of the greenhouse gases we've been adding ourselves. There's a couple of different ideas. The most promising one would aim to mimic the effect of volcanic eruptions. So some of the biggest eruptions in history, like Tambora in 1815, Pinatubo in 1991 - the big eruption goes off, and the very powerful ones penetrate up into the stratosphere, which is a high layer in the atmosphere. And there the particles that they release scatter around the entire planet and then reflect light away for a couple of years. And in the years after these big eruptions, we see temperatures dip and then slowly recover. And the idea is that we could create that effect, but persistently, to help offset future global warming. RASCOE: So how would this work? IRVINE: Yeah. So volcanoes put up a few million tons - the big ones that have this cooling effect put up a few million tons of this gas, sulfur dioxide, into the stratosphere. You could get an aircraft to fly that high, dump this gas and come back down. And with enough of them, you could get millions of tons up. We're talking tens to hundreds of aircraft, so it's not a huge amount. And every engineering assessment today comes to the same conclusion. This is feasible and relatively cheap. We could offset basically the difference between where we're headed, which seems to be something like 2 1/2 Celsius of global warming, to where we want to be, which is 1 1/2, or to limit it to that much, at about $20 billion per year, which is a lot of money, but not a lot of money compared to the costs of climate change and the costs of dealing with it. RASCOE: How would sulfur dioxide cool the planet? Like, how does that work? IRVINE: Just like the volcanic eruption, we would be adding this sulfur dioxide gas, which goes on to react in the atmosphere to form these really tiny droplets. And they're so tiny that they effectively stay suspended in the air. And now, this happens in the lower atmosphere. These little particles are responsible for the haze you see on many days. And they stay suspended until they get caught up in rain clouds and rained out. But up in the upper atmosphere, it's very dry. There's no clouds. And so these particles persist for several years until they gradually, slowly fall down. And so yeah, this relatively small amount of material that we could put into the upper atmosphere would have this disproportionately large cooling effect. RASCOE: What is the risk from, you know, releasing the sulfur dioxide? IRVINE: Well, I think the first thing to note is this is not an alternative to cutting greenhouse gas emissions. The CO2 would still be there. It'd still be having this warming effect on the planet. And this would only be a temporary cooling effect to sort of offset some of the consequences. It would also have some side effects similar - well, the same side effects that volcanoes do. The sulfur dioxide adds to acid rain a little. It would delay the recovery of the ozone hole by some time, and it would make the sky a little hazier. But yeah, it would have these side effects, and they're not good. But the question is, it seems that they're a lot less bad than climate change would be. And here's the White House playing their part too: The White House on Monday released a congressionally-mandated research plan for a process to help reduce the effects of solar radiation by reflecting sunlight back into space but said no formal study is being planned at this time. https://t.co/fEioj5BhNt — NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) July 3, 2023 DC_Draino is not "Legacy Media" but he's also posting about it: Sunset in Dallas Mother Nature is beautiful! pic.twitter.com/Gy3XJbJegV — DC_Draino (@DC_Draino) December 12, 2023 This is NOT normal folks! It's not just clouds! Come on people! As I said, we've been pounding this drum as loud as we can for several years now. Here's the truth if you dare go down this rabbit hole (or just look UP next time you're outside!): Chemtrails Exposed: Poison In The Sky Above You! We cover the truth here at WLTReport and we follow that truth wherever it takes us. One such place is the skies directly above us. So many people are so oblivious to what's happening in the sky above them that it's truly stunning. One of my favorite things to do on a day of heavy chemtrails spraying is to just ask people "hey, what do you think that is? as I point up to the checkerboard criss-cross pattern of white trails in the sky above. I usually get a blank stare back, so I usually have to clarify with some follow up questions, like: "yes, those long white lines, what do you think those are?  Do you think those are clouds?" It's so fun to watch the responses. I would say MOST people have never even considered it. A good number of people have probably never known any different. They've never seen a totally blue sky with only clouds and no chemtrails. And that's what the "Elites" are banking on. Within one generation, no one will even think this is strange....they'll just think that's how the sky looks, never giving it a second thought. Community Notes says these are vapor trails. In my world vapor doesn't stick around#Chemtrails https://t.co/ttifA6aDiZ — SouthFloridaBig444 (@voice612230) September 3, 2023 So that's why I ask the question. It's also why I created ChemtrailsExposed.com.  (more on that in a minute) So I ask people what they think they are, and most people are truly dumbfounded. You can see them realize quickly that they're not clouds, but beyond that the look of confusion sets in. "Airplanes" is the most common answer, with the most "sophisticated" (or so they think) people saying "those are just contrails". Contrails ARE real....but they aren't what you see lingering in the sky for hours on end. Quick lesson -- Contrails vs. Chemtrails: Not had a sunny day here in Lancs for a solid 2 wks. These #skybastards need taking down. My home grown veg has pretty much failed this year and my apple tree is dying. They're spraying so much SHT into our air every day and the dumbos think it's just water vapour. #chemtrails pic.twitter.com/0FAsJdVDWS — ANGRYNIC (@ANGRYNIC2) August 30, 2023 Contrails dissipate quickly. Normal. I remember as a kid (before the Internet, when you would read cereal boxes at breakfast to stay entertained) looking up at the sky on a blue sky summer day and watching one plane fly across. I remember putting my finger up and measuring how fast the contrail dissipated. Totally normal. Those are contrails. No spraying, no chemicals -- just water vapor from the jet engines as the plane briefly disrupts the sky. But the white trail that doesn't dissipate but hangs in the sky for a long period of time, and which just so happens to almost always be flown in a checkerboard crosshatch pattern? THOSE, my friends, are chemtrails and they look like this: Indeed. Not ice. Not water. Not normal flight paths. Not conspiracy. Not contrails #chemtrails https://t.co/7Per1CFsTL — ANGRYNIC (@ANGRYNIC2) August 31, 2023 And this: Nothing to see here just some chemtrails being sprayed This isn’t normal people.#AlexWasRight #chemtrails (Note: there’s a plane spraying them but it’s hard to see in the photo) pic.twitter.com/avvRQ8BEfI — CCG NATHAN (@realccgnathan) September 5, 2023 Almost always a crosshatch pattern or an "X" pattern. I assume it's for maximum coverage. It's usually at this point in the conversation that the Cognitive Dissonance starts to kick in -- and it usually kicks in HARD! "Why would they do that?" "They would never do that!" "That's just a tinfoil hat conspiracy theory!" In a word?  LOL. Literally poison being sprayed in the sky above you for all to see and you can't trust your own eyes because the Cognitive Dissonance is so strong. But you do know the CIA has long since admitted it, right? ......right? Watch here: CIA Admits Chemtrails are NOT Conspiracy. Chemtrails are very real. Weather control is very real. Directed Energy Weapons are very real. Next they’re planning to block out the sun! Evil exists my friends. #Chemtrails #conspiracy https://t.co/4LMWK1bkkk — Melissa Dawn (@GenXNewsOnX) September 3, 2023 As with everything, they just give it a slightly different name. So it's not "baby killing" it's "family planning" or "a woman's choice". And it's definitely not "child mutilation" it's "gender affirming care". See how they do it? So they actually talk about chemtrails all the time, you just have to know the words. It's not "chemtrails" it's "geoeengineering" or "cloud seeding" or "weather modification" or "atmospheric aerosol injections": The view actually talks about weather modification and cloud seeding. what are your thoughts on modifying and controlling the weather? #Chemtrails #BillGates. pic.twitter.com/t00g2QQErW — Erin Elizabeth Health Nut News (@unhealthytruth) September 5, 2023 So my mission is to wake people up. It's why I created ChemtrailsExposed.com  -- the largest database of chemtrails on the Internet! Here is our map: Please visit our Homepage here at ChemtrailsExposed.com to add your chemtrails photos! And visit our Map page here to add your pushpin! Our goal is to have a pushpin in every country in the world. Will you please add yours? Now let's keep diving deeper.... Chemtrails Confirmed: They're Real and Very Dangerous! I've been covering chemtrails for a long time on this channel. Many, many people have woken up as a direct result of our coverage. More on that below. In what used to be maybe a 50/50 response, I'd say we're now closer to 75% who have taken the red pill and are pissed off at what's happening in the skies above them. But we still have maybe 25% of the people who refuse to admit it. Most of that is cognitive dissonance. It's much easier to fool people than to convince them they've been fooled. Why? Because then they've played the fool for years or even decades. Much easier to stick your head in the sand, stick your fingers in your ears, close your eyes and say "I SEE NOTHING!" Well, sorry that doesn't work for me. It may be a bitter pill to swallow... You may not like it... It might piss you off.... But we need to have a mass awakening. So for all the holdouts, all I can tell you is watch this video. It shows all the patents they've been granted. It shows close up the planes turning on and off the sprayers in mid flight. It goes deep into the science and shows the heavy levels of the particulate found in our air. It's all in here. One of the best documentaries I've ever seen. I know we'll wake up a bunch of new people with this one. I also know there will still be a few people like this, even in spite of video evidence: And to those people I remind you of this quote: "There is a principal which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep man in everlasting ignorance – That principle is contempt prior to investigation.” Watch here: Backup for safe keeping on Rumble here: I could use your help... I've started a new website called ChemtrailsExposed.com and it's quickly becoming the largest database of Chemtrails on the Internet! Check out some of the recent posts, these will make your blood boil... Chemtrails ALL over the world! And this: Always in a cross-hatch pattern for max dispersion: Even in France! We recently added a World Map and we're dropping a pin in every spot where Chemtrails have been spotted. Will you please add yours? VIEW THE WORLD MAP HERE Now let's keep going... People Waking Up To Chemtrails Everywhere! One of my proudest accomplishments here at WeLoveTrump has been getting hundreds, thousands, millions (?) to wake up to the reality of chemtrails. The reality of the air above them literally being sprayed and poisoned. To.  Just.  Look.  Up. And it's working! Check out this latest email I received (all personal information redacted for privacy): Here's one of the videos they sent me: #Chemtrails over New Hampshire sky... pic.twitter.com/aSYk7Hl0zH — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) January 4, 2023 It wasn't too long ago that this would have gone completely un-noticed... Or people would have argued with me that it was "normal". Now we're finally seeing red-pill moments happening all over the country! Here's more: Arizona Under Attack From Chemtrails? Election Related? I just saw video of the WORST chemtrails I have ever seen. Big thanks to a reader in Arizona (name withheld) for getting out his phone and snagging the video. We truly have the best community here at WeLoveTrump...and we're 4-6 million strong each month and growing! I'll show you the video in just a minute, but first I want to note that this is not that far away from Maricopa County, and may in fact have looked exactly the same in Maricopa County if you were standing there. So I just have one question: is Arizona under attack right now and is it related to the vote count which is still going on in Maricopa County? Is this a fight over Kari Lake? Think chemtrails can't possibly be related? I'm not so sure. This is a pattern I've seen over and over again. Just like when they used engineered weather to destroy Florida with Hurricanes (yes, they did) are they using chemtrails to attack Arizona? How does it work? What's the end game? I don't know all the specifics, but I know breathing in those heavy metals from the air makes people angry, agitated, irritated, dumbed down?  Brain fog? Is this all a plot to continue to create chaos down there? All I'm saying is don't rule it out. Now check out this video on Rumble from my on-the-ground reporter: Ever seen that many? All lined up? Perfectly in succession? Two planes just going up and back, back and forth, creating perfect lines all across the sky. Don't tell me these are contrails created by normal planes flying. If these were normal planes flying, it must be the flight from hell because they keep flying and getting no where! It's like when you mow your yard...up and back, back and forth, side to side. That's exactly what they're doing up there. Just like when you mow your lawn using your riding mower, you're not riding that mower because you're trying to get to the store. You're trying to criss-cross your whole yard and cover every square inch. Same. Thing. Here. Here was California just a few weeks ago: FROM A READER: Chemtrails EXPOSED In California! I've said it before and I'll say it again... We have the BEST people here in the WeLoveTrump community! Smart... Bold... Brave... Strong... And people who use the brain God gave them to think for themselves. I started covering chemtrails here about 5 years ago, and when I started most people had no idea what they were. Most people had severe Cognitive Dissonance on the topic, which is understandable. But the more we've presented the evidence (more of that below), the more people have slowly woken up. And LOOKED up! Looked up to the sky above them and sometimes begrudgingly had to admit: this is not normal. This is not what the skies looked like 30 years ago. This is bad, very bad, People like this reader who just emailed me today. Name and email address blocked out for privacy, but I wanted to share her wonderful message: And here are the images: Notice all the X patterns. Always sprayed in a cross hatch! This wasn't the first time we've had a great reader report, waking up to the reality of Chemtrails. Remember this? MUST SEE: Chemtrails EXPOSED In Arizona! This article really pumps me up! Why? Because people are waking up all across this great nation! I publish each day from America's Heartland but I get emails from readers all across our country every single day (actually, from all across the world). And what really pumps me up is to see people doing their own research, thinking for themselves, and then sending me emails with their thoughts... Or with photos and videos! And that's what I have to share with you right now. We've been covering the TRUTH behind Chemtrails for a longtime here at WeLoveTrump. It's always baffled me how they can literally be spraying heavy chemicals like aluminum and barium in the skies right above us, and some people don't notice! Or refuse to even question what may be happening. Because it's easier to just ignore it than to really consider the idea that our government and/or the "power elite" are literally spraying poisons into our air for us to breathe. Perhaps it's why cancer has skyrocketed? Why autism has skyrocketed? Why dementia has skyrocketed? Heavy metals in the brain? Hmmm.... Well, I was so pumped today to get an email from a reader who sent me this video from Casa Grande, AZ capturing some of the absolute worst Chemtrails I have ever seen! They shot a video and sent it to me! FOLKS....we are winning! We are winning hearts and minds and we are waking people up! They're waking up and realizing the skies NEVER looked like this 25 years ago. Do you remember? Think back and ask yourself if you EVER saw this 25 years ago? Nope. You saw blue skies and clouds. Friends, these are NOT clouds. Massive lines that stretch for edge to edge in the sky? That's not a cloud. And here are THREE of them lined up in a perfect line. We don't know what happened next, but based on my experience, after they lined up these three parallel chemtrail lines, the planes then flew back in a cross-hatch pattern to get maximum distribution. Anyway, check out this awesome video that a reader sent me (you can hear him say "Hey Noah!") and gave me permission to upload and post here on Rumble: And now for everyone who is about to tell me all the reasons why this is normal, I humbly ask you to keep reading... Sorry folks, you used to be able to give me any number of excuses and justifications claiming that I was wrong and these were not chemtrails, but you no longer have that option. You no longer have that luxury. Because just last week, the White House itself came out and said POINT BLANK....we are spraying chemicals into the air. We call it "stratospheric aerosol injections" and we've been doing it for 20 years. Oh, and that's not some fringe website...that was reported on CNBC. I have all the details here if you have the courage to deal with your own cognitive dissonance and read it: Crimes Against Humanity: CNBC Just ADMITTED Chemtrails Are Real STANDARD DISCLAIMER: this article will trigger some with extreme cognitive dissonance.  Beware.   I've been reporting on chemtrails for a LONG time on this website. And I always get a few categories of responses... Response #1 - people who see the chemtrails with their own eyes just like I do and know this is NOT natural and something is very wrong here.  Very bad idea to be doing this. This group is growing and I would say is now well over 50%. The next responses are the people suffering from cognitive dissonance. I get it. It's a very hard red pill to swallow to think your government is spraying heavy metals into the air (that then fall down and we breath them in). A likely contributor to all the sickness and disease and dis-ease we all feel? Very likely. So Response #2 goes like this - these are nothing more that contrails from airplanes.  Just a jet stream. The only problem with this is two-fold: One, contrails do exist, but they evaporate very quickly and don't stay in the air. See the big picture at the top of this article? Those are crossing chemtrail lines (they love to spray them in X or crosshatch patterns) and those have been in the sky often for over and hour long.  Not contrails.  Not dissipating. The other big problem with Response #2? CNBC just told you that chemtrails are real, and I'll cover that in just a moment. Response #3 - they can't be chemtrails because every pilot and airport in the world would have to be "in on it" and that's just not possible.  Plus no one could be that evil.  I just don't want to believe it so I refuse to even consider it. Otherwise known as the Ostrich approach. Refusing to consider truth does not stop it from being truth, it just means you may have buried your head in the sand. Now let's go to CNBC and the White House, who both now fully admit this is happening. They call them "stratospheric aerosol injections". We've reported on that term for a long time -- John Brennan himself admitted it about 10 years ago at the CFR. But now even CNBC is covering it. Take a look: They literally admit They are Spraying the Skies NOW!!!!! Every conspiracy is FACT https://t.co/Jp6wPWfXGv — Christopher Greene (@amtvmedia) October 13, 2022 I love this quote from the CNBC article: Read that quote again: "Because it has the potential to affect the entire glove, it often gets the most attention." Yeah, you don't say!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE! Yeah, spraying heavy chemicals into our skies -- into the air we literally breathe -- certainly should get the most attention! That's why we've been shouting it from the rooftops on this website. CNBC also tells us this all started as early as 1965: Another quote is even more mindblowing... Check this out: For all the deniers and Ostrich's out there, please READ THIS AGAIN very carefully! Quote: "This isn't something new...we're already doing it!" And then even more mindblowing: "We don't understand what we're doing." Put it all together folks, and they just told you this:  We've been spraying heavy chemicals into your air for decades.  It's real.  It's not new.  We're already doing it.  And honestly we don't even really know what we're doing or the longterm affects." This is outright criminal. CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Yes, it's that serious. Here is just a portion of that CNBC article (read the full article here: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/13/what-is-solar-geoengineering-sunlight-reflection-risks-and-benefits.html): The White House is coordinating a five-year research plan to study ways of modifying the amount of sunlight that reaches the earth to temper the effects of global warming, a process sometimes called solar geoengineering or sunlight reflection. The research plan will assess climate interventions, including spraying aerosols into the stratosphere to reflect sunlight back into space, and should include goals for research, what’s necessary to analyze the atmosphere, and what impact these kinds of climate interventions may have on Earth, according to the White House’s Office of Science and Technology Policy. Congress directed the research plan be produced in its spending plan for 2022, which President Joe Biden signed in March. Some of the techniques, such as spraying sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere, are known to have harmful effects on the environment and human health. But scientists and climate leaders who are concerned that humanity will overshoot its emissions targets say research is important to figure out how best to balance these risks against a possibly catastrophic rise in the Earth’s temperature. Getting ready to research a topic is a very preliminary step, but it’s notable the White House is formally engaging with what has largely been seen as the stuff of dystopian fantasy. In Kim Stanley Robinson’s science fiction novel, “The Ministry for the Future,” a heat wave in India kills 20 million people and out of desperation, India decides to implement its own strategy of limiting the sunlight that gets to Earth. Chris Sacca, the founder of climate tech investment fund Lowercarbon Capital, said it’s prudent for the White House to be spearheading the research effort. “Sunlight reflection has the potential to safeguard the livelihoods of billions of people, and it’s a sign of the White House’s leadership that they’re advancing the research so that any future decisions can be rooted in science not geopolitical brinkmanship,” Sacca told CNBC. (Sacca has donated money to support research in the area, but said he has “zero financial interests beyond philanthropy” in the idea and does not think there should be private business models in the space, he told CNBC.) Harvard professor David Keith, who first worked on the topic in 1989, said it’s being taken much more seriously now. He points to formal statements of support for researching sunlight reflection from the Environmental Defense Fund, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and the Natural Resources Defense Council, and the creation of a new group he advises called the Climate Overshoot Commission, an international group of scientists and lawmakers that’s evaluating climate interventions in preparation for a world that warms beyond what the Paris Climate Accord recommended. To be clear, nobody is saying sunlight-reflection modification is the solution to climate change. Reducing emissions remains the priority. “You cannot judge what the country does on solar-radiation modification without looking at what it is doing in emission reductions, because the priority is emission reductions,” said Janos Pasztor, executive director of the Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative. “Solar-radiation modification will never be a solution to the climate crisis.” Three ways to reduce sunlight The idea of sunlight reflection first appeared prominently in a 1965 report to President Lyndon B. Johnson, entitled “Restoring the Quality of Our Environment,” Keith told CNBC. The report floated the idea of spreading particles over the ocean at a cost of $100 per square mile. A one percent change in the reflectivity of the Earth would cost $500 million per year, which does “not seem excessive,” the report said, “considering the extraordinary economic and human importance of climate.” The estimated price tag has gone up since then. The current estimate is that it would cost $10 billion per year to run a program that cools the Earth by 1 degree Celsius, said Edward A. Parson, a professor of environmental law at UCLA’s law school. But that figure is seen to be remarkably cheap compared to other climate change mitigation initiatives. A landmark report released in March 2021 from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine addressed three kinds of solar geoengineering: stratospheric aerosol injection, marine cloud brightening, and cirrus cloud thinning. Stratospheric aerosol injection would involve flying aircraft into the stratosphere, or between 10 miles and 30 miles skyward, and spraying a fine mist that would hang in the air, reflecting some of the sun’s radiation back into space. “The stratosphere is calm, and things stay up there for a long time,” Parson told CNBC. “The atmospheric life of stuff that’s injected in the stratosphere is between six months and two years.” Stratospheric aerosol injection “would immediately take the high end off hot extremes,” Parson said. And also it would “pretty much immediately” slow extreme precipitation events, he said. “The top-line slogan about stratospheric aerosol injection, which I wrote in a paper more than 10 years ago — but it’s still apt — is fast, cheap and imperfect. Fast is crucial. Nothing else that we do for climate change is fast. Cheap, it’s so cheap,” Parson told CNBC. “And it’s not imperfect because we haven’t got it right yet. It’s imperfect because the imperfection is embedded in the way it works. The same reason it’s fast is the reason that it’s imperfect, and there’s no way to get around that.” One option for an aerosol is sulfur dioxide, the cooling effects of which are well known from volcanic eruptions. The 1991 eruption of Mount Pinatubo, for instance, spewed thousands of tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, causing global temperatures to drop temporarily by about 1 degree Fahrenheit, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. My friend Christopher Greene had more on the story: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u_oVj2GGHzc But here's the good news...because our reporting has been so honest and accurate, we are winning! People are waking up! We are truly are winning hearts and opening minds. People are finally looking up and seeing what has been obvious in the skies above them for years. Like this email I just got from a reader (name withheld for privacy). This is so encouraging! Read this: And then check out the photos they sent me... Pretty obvious, isn't it? THANK YOU so much for your email and for sharing your story with me! Tell others! And if you need more evidence and more things to show people, keep reading and show them this article. Because I have video upon video of them in their own words admitting what they are doing. Keep reading... Just yesterday I brought you an update from The Guardian that not only admitted to "cloud seeding" happening for years, but it explained in explicit detail that it's done by spraying heavy chemicals into the air. I'll leave that research below. But now I have a second video to share with you on the same topic thanks to a reader who sent it to me. Look how old this video is and then realize they've been admitting it even back then. Stunning, watch here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7G8-eCwK0M Backup on Rumble: And now here is my research from just yesterday, from The Guardian. I know some of you have such serious cognitive dissonance that you can't physically bring yourself to look up in the sky and see the chemicals being sprayed in the air above you. That's ok, but I'm going to continue reporting on it regardless. We've covered this topic many times and provided countless evidence (beyond just using your eyes and looking up!) all of which I will copy down below in case you want more reading. But for now I want to talk about the latest confirmation: China has now admitted to "cloud seeding". China deploys cloud-seeding planes and cuts electricity use as record heatwave takes toll https://t.co/mZ4SQyrHBL — The Guardian (@guardian) August 18, 2022 I can already hear some of your thoughts in your head: "THAT'S NOT CHEMTRAILS!" How do you think they accomplish the cloud seeding? Rain dances? Sorry folks...it's by spraying large amounts of chemicals into the sky to form the clouds. Here it is in black & white literally admitted verbatim to chemtails -- from The Guardian: On Wednesday, China’s south-western province of Sichuan said it would ration power supplies to homes, offices and shopping malls, after having already ordered producers of energy-intensive metals and fertiliser to curb operations. In what appears to be an official call to cut electricity use, government offices were asked to set air conditioners no lower than 26C (79F) and use the stairs instead of lifts, the Sichuan Daily said. Fountains, light shows and commercial activities after dark are to be suspended, it added. On Wednesday, the central province of Hubei became the latest to unveil an effort to induce rainfall, by sending airplanes to fire the chemical silver iodide into the clouds. Other regions on the Yangtze have also launched “cloud seeding” programmes, but with cloud cover too thin, operations in some parched areas have stayed on standby. Power shortages have also prompted several companies in the sprawling Chongqing region bordering Sichuan to say they would suspend production. I bolded it, but let's just read it all again together, shall we? QUOTE: "BY SENDING AIRPLAINES TO FIRE THE CHEICAL SILVER IODIDE INTO THE CLOUDS." Folks, what more do you need to see? They're real and they're very bad for humanity. The good news is MANY people are waking up and catching on...like Tucker: Is anyone said chemtrails? Tucker Carlson: "Dim The Sun" experimental cloud seeding sponsored by Bill Gates pic.twitter.com/Dly41JhlC9 — OliveirA (@COl86698257) August 30, 2022 And this Raymond dude: End #HAARP, cloud seeding, geo engineering, #chemtrails and the secret Phoenix Project everything will be fine. https://t.co/gMmYpgXN4j — Raymond Kibonekha (@ray99kibz) September 1, 2022 And this sums it up perfectly: Chemtrails is cloud seeding. pic.twitter.com/aOEloapvCC — Put on the whole armour of God (@youutube88) August 28, 2022 Want more? Let's keep going, this was just the tip of the iceberg! Why do the so-called "Elites" seem to hate the sun so much? They constantly warn of "global warming"... They are obsessed with ways to block out the sun... Which only tells me one thing: the Sun must be VERY important. And never has a photo been more significant than one I snapped recently. The photo you see above is a photo I actually took myself...two MASSIVE chemtrails in an "X" formation and it just so happened when I snapped the shot that they "X'ed" out the sun. Fitting, isn't it? This makes me so furious, here's what they are doing, it's really almost beyond comprehension... First, you have to understand these are NOT "frozen water vapors" like they try to claim. Those are real and they are called "contrails" short for "condensation trails" and they are very short behind a plane and evaporate quickly. Chemtrails are different. They don't go away quickly. They grow and spread out over the entire sky over the course of an afternoon. They're often sprayed in X or cross-hatch patterns to get maximum coverage in the sky. And...they contain heavy metals like aluminum, barium and now confirmed to have graphene. All extremely toxic to humans. I saw this on Twitter today and I was so encouraged to see other people getting it! pic.twitter.com/iN9Wmx140M — healthbot (@thehealthb0t) April 25, 2022 And this: I seriously can't with ppl who argue against this. I mean look up for crying outloud. It's literally that simple. Smh. The arguments I've read over the past few days on here are scary. Ppl are so dumb. — Live learn teach (@fisherplgl) April 25, 2022 And this: Kinda like this.Spreads out and covers the sky with aluminum among other things. pic.twitter.com/T88EXt1ua0 — Rajeanmachine (@rajean11) April 25, 2022 Smart people! Now here's the most insidious part: these evil "elites" are spraying these day after day after day literally poisoning the air we breathe and then they have the GALL to claim that humans are destroying the ozone layer by our use of carbon-based fossil fuels. It's true that humans are destroying the environment, but it's not just by living. It's this small group of elite sickos who are literally spraying the skies day after day with toxic heavy metals! Then they claim we have to join the Paris Accord and give up all our freedoms and pay yet another tax (a "carbon tax" -- what a joke!). It's the same game plan they run over and over. Take COVID. Cook up COVID in a biolab in Ukraine or China, release it to the public, use the MSM to hype it up and work everyone into a panic, and then tell everyone the only cure is to take their poison vaccine. It's the same cycle over and over and over again.... THEY create a problem, they use their propaganda machines in the MSM to work everyone into a panic, then THEY roll out their solution, which is usually worse than the problem! Sick, sick, sick stuff! Sean over at SGT Report just had Dane Wigington back on his show to talk more about this. They go into everything in much greater detail and I really want you to watch this video. Watch and then share. We have to wake people up to what is literally being poisoned in the skies right above them! And yes, they answer all the common questions like: Aren't they poisoning themselves too?  Why do it? How do we know what metals are in the spray? What video evidence do we have of the spraying? Isn't this just a "contrail"?  (Answer: No!) Watch the full interview here on Rumble: Now let's dig in even more... Here are a few more photos I took from a couple weeks ago while I was enjoying a nice afternoon at the park with my kids. The day started off with big, beautiful blue skies...not a cloud in the sky. And then, this started happening: There still wasn't a cloud in the sky, but there these things! Chemtrails. I just have to wonder what most people think when they look up and see this... Serious question. Here are the options I've come up with so far: Option 1- they don't even think about it.  Never even occurs to them. Option 2- they think they are normal condensation trails ("contrails") caused by planes. Option 3- they know something is wrong but don't know what or what they can do about it. My hunch is over half the population falls into Option 1. They are literally spraying heavy chemicals into the skies above us -- into the air we breathe -- and I have to believe if the majority of the people understood that and thought about it, there would be hell to pay. But as it stands, I almost never hear anyone even question it. Then I think there is a group of people like this Harvard Professor below, who I think fall into Option 2. It can't possibly be a "conspiracy" (even though all the other conspiracies seem to be coming true before our eyes). No, they say -- all explainable by science! Besides, they say, the government couldn't possibly keep something like that a secret! And all the commercial airline pilots and crew couldn't keep it a secret either, they say! Watch the short video and then I'll give my reaction: Ok, so my take? First, "compartmentalization" explains most of what the government keeps secret. There are very, very few people who know the "whole picture" and the whole plan of any operation. Everyone else just works on their small part and never has any idea or reason to question how it all fits together. Second, no one who believes these are chemical trails believes they are attached to commercial airplanes.  That's just stupid and an intentional red herring to alter the argument. No, the people who believe these are chemical trails believe these are government planes or private planes or both. Again, compartmentalized by a very small subset of people and probably people who get very specific and limited orders and are not told anything further. Now let's explore some more pictures and videos and you tell me if these look normal to you: Just a reminder they are poisoning your SKIES and they Don’t Care!! LOOK AT THIS!!!! These are harmful Chemicals to Humans and Harvard has now Admitted They are SPRAYING the Skies to Cool the Planet. I’ve had Enormous Headaches the Last few Days. #amtv #chemtrails pic.twitter.com/OOcn6ek7o8 — Christopher Greene (@amtvmedia) October 6, 2019 Or this: This is #staffordshire #england #derbyshire skies. I'm sorry but I do not believe these to be #contrails. In my opinion these are #chemtrails #aluminium #barium etc #GeoEngineering .. Seems to be admitted too yet publicity in the U.K. none existent - please LOOK UP #antchem pic.twitter.com/coUitesRm6 — Anthony Rhead (@antsared) January 9, 2019 Or this: https://twitter.com/Urylle/status/1306631683664490498 Or this: Please LK UP... Even if you don't contemplate what you see as out of the ordinary, please see mass, volume of total sky obliteration. Its not trails anymore it total obliteration. Please research #GeoEngineering #chemtrails. See how its been admitted. #staffordshire #antchem pic.twitter.com/jdSjINzRI4 — Anthony Rhead (@antsared) April 6, 2019 My friends, these are NOT normal! And they're not just "condensation trails" either. Let's take a moment to address that. Condensation trails DO exist and are normal. In fact, back in the 1980s I remember seeing a lot of them. I even remember as a kid watching them go across the sky and how quickly they disappeared. Read that last part again: they ALWAYS quickly dissipated! I even remember holding my finger up in the sky to track how quickly they would dissipate and go away completely (hey, we didn't have anything else to do, there was no internet!). But that's a key point. They NEVER lasted for longer than a very short stretch of the sky and they never spread out over time over the course of a whole afternoon. Contrails exist, but they are VERY different from chemtrails. Chemtrails have heavy chemicals designed to stay in the air and spread out. They don't dissipate. They expand. Big difference. Now, here's the real kicker... Would you be surprised to know that the Deep State doesn't even try to hide it? They ADMIT it! I find it so hilarious when people who think it's a "conspiracy theory" try to defend them, and I want to just ask them....you do know that even the Deep Staters like John Brennan are admitting it? Right? Right.....? The thing is, they don't call them "chemtrails". No, that would be too obvious. They call them "stratospheric aerosol injections". Which is a super fancy way of saying chemtrails. Literally injecting heavy metals into the sky. Other times they call them "geo-engineering". They all mean the same thing. Here is the full video: And because that will almost certainly be deleted by YouTube as soon as I post this, I made a backup. Here it is on Rumble: And confirmed here too: https://twitter.com/Oval_Glass/status/1180900077641973762 More: Only Government planes spray !! NOT BOEING 747 OR COMMERCIAL AIRLINERS AT SAME ALTITUDE! GOV’T HAS NOW ADMITTED THEY ARE SPRAYING #CHEMTRAILS TO PROMOTE GLOBAL COOLING It’s All Lies!!! THEY ARE SPRAYING YOU LIKE A BUG FOLKS! TIES INTO #5G TOO! IT’S Terraforming the Earth pic.twitter.com/wLJXZ1thsJ — Christopher Greene (@amtvmedia) January 19, 2020 MIT admitting it too: Here’s what geoengineering means and why you should care. https://t.co/2jd2Ht1RYq pic.twitter.com/FwB7XozD20 — MIT Technology Review (@techreview) August 15, 2019 And this: It's not like they are hiding it. 54 countries are on record/have admitted they are geoengineering the skies.The US is even discussing chemtrails & plasma weapons (think forest fires/911) in the senate! pic.twitter.com/9felAmC55d — Paul (@1starshot) September 21, 2019 And here: Oh and also... pic.twitter.com/zzLrzEgtn1 — Kimberley (@kimberley82h) September 21, 2019 The Deep State likes to call stuff like this "hidden in plain sight". Or is that in "plane" sight? Would you please help us and share this everywhere? Let's get the truth out! It absolutely boggles my mind how they are doing this every single day in the skies above us and it's on display literally for the whole world to see and most people either don't see it, don't understand it, don't question it or just don't want to take the red pill and wake up. Sorry folks, it's time to wake up. All the B.S. about "clean air" and the B.S. Paris Accord and all that garbage and in the meantime they are LITERALLY spraying the air with toxic metals on a DAILY basis. Makes me furious. It should make every single American furious. It's time to act. But I want to know what you think...

Ivermectin Is The Future of Cancer Treatment?
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Ivermectin Is The Future of Cancer Treatment?

DISCLAIMER: I’m not a doctor.  I’m not a research scientist.  I’m not making any claims that Ivermectin can treat, cure or prevent any disease.  I’m simply reporting on a lot of different things I’m seeing that all show incredible promise for what this “Miracle Drug” might be able to do.  And perhaps, under a second Trump Administration with the FDA and HHS both cleaned up and working to bring life-changing new treatments to the public, perhaps we’ll see incredible things happen? Let’s dig in…. I want to start with this incredible Tweet thread which suggests Ivermectin could indeed be the future of cancer treatment: Ivermectin is the future of cancer treatment. This drug was once labeled “horse de-wormer.” Today, extensive research reveals it has 15 powerful ANTI-CANCER mechanisms of action. Let’s look at the science behind how it works: pic.twitter.com/pqOZTmLxLd — Ben Smith (@bensmithlive) November 25, 2024 Ivermectin has at least 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action (apoptosis, autophagy, pyroptosis, etc.) Let me explain the above-mentioned ↓ pic.twitter.com/DXElH10pz0 — Ben Smith (@bensmithlive) November 25, 2024 → Autophagy It forces cancer cells to “eat themselves” through their internal recycling system. Studies on breast cancer cells showed IVM increases LC3, Bclin1, Atg5 (autophagy proteins) forming “self-eating” structures. Scientists proved this by blocking the process.… pic.twitter.com/RjsQFUR8Or — Ben Smith (@bensmithlive) November 25, 2024 Other IVM’s anti-cancer mechanisms of action: • Inhibits tumor growth/proliferation• Inhibits tumor initiation/progression• Regulates tumor micro-environment• Causes cancer cell mitochondrial dysfunction• Stops cancer cell migration, invasion & metastasis pic.twitter.com/Sn2t69Am1C — Ben Smith (@bensmithlive) November 25, 2024 In this interview with the cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy, she talks about her patient who had cancer in 11 bones in his body. A few months later, this patient was told he was in a remission. How is this possible? He took Ivermectin ↓ pic.twitter.com/4Roa6LTzAN — Ben Smith (@bensmithlive) November 25, 2024 This story is too dark and long to tell in one thread. The lies. The crimes. The cover-ups. Episode 2 of Modern Health Renaissance exposes what really happened in 2020 with the vaccine, IVM, and media manipulation. You can watch it now on YT:https://t.co/ASRk7n6Y3y — Ben Smith (@bensmithlive) November 25, 2024 Watch more here: When I caught Covid, my friends rushed doses of Ivermectin to me — kicked Covid in 24 hours. Here’s a cancer surgeon revealing her discoveries about the impact of Ivermectin on CANCER… 9 min. must see:pic.twitter.com/LcwEY7R7wg Also — Compelling Evidence for Ivermectin in… — Bobby (@bobanderson77) November 26, 2024 I’ve actually covered this before and found over 20 peer-reviewed Medical Journals that all show the exact same thing: Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? 20 Peer-Reviewed Medical Journal Articles! *Keep reading and I'll show you where to get SAFE Ivermectin.  Links below! Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? 20 Peer-Reviewed Medical Journal Articles! I've covered this topic before but it continues to fascinate me so I'm covering it again and going WAY deeper! Can Ivermectin treat, stop, reverse or even CURE cancer? First, I have to give my standard disclaimer: I'm not a doctor. I'm not even a scientist. Nothing in this article has been evaluated or approved by the FDA -- but let's be honest, that probably just means you should pay EXTRA attention to it, right? Ok, we all good with the disclaimer? Ok good! Now, why am I even investigating this? Because the more I look into it, the more I find! When I first saw them come out so strong against Ivermectin, I knew it had to be pretty powerful and pretty good for humans in general! I've never seen such an aggressive pushback by BigPharma, so I figured it probably did more than just treat COVID19. Then I started seeing reports that it could treat cancer. And I'm not just talking about posts on Twitter or TikTok....I'm talking about peer-reviewed medical journals! I'll post my original report farther below, but first I want to show you what I found on ChatGPT. I installed a special plugin that connects the OpenAI to a database of 200 million scholarly and medical journals and then I asked it to give me all peer reviewed medical journals that suggest Ivermectin can be effective in treating cancer. I think you'll find this fascinating -- and for those of you who want the nitty gritty details, each article is linked so you can go read the full thing for yourself. From ChatGPT: Here are some scholarly articles focusing on the use of Ivermectin in treating cancer, organized by their publication date (newest first): The Detrimental Effect of Pre-Treatment with Ivermectin on Myocardial Ischemia Publication Date: 2023-10-25 Authors: Sara Cheraghi, Shabnam Babataheri, H. Soraya Abstract: This study explores the effects of Ivermectin (IVM) on cardiovascular diseases, particularly focusing on myocardial ischemia in both ex vivo and in vivo. Neuroprotective effects of ivermectin against transient cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats Publication Date: 2023-09-27 Authors: Behdad Seyyedabadi, Shabnam Babataheri, Ismail Laher, H. Soraya Abstract: Not available. Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lung adenocarcinoma cells Publication Date: 2023-09-23 Authors: Man-Yuan Li, Jiao Zhang, Xiao Lu, Dong Zhou, Xufeng Deng, Quan-xing Liu, J. Dai, Hong Zheng Abstract: Not available. Outcome of Ivermectin in Cancer Treatment: An Experience in Loja-Ecuador (PDF) Publication Date: 2023-02-22 Authors: Yuliana Jiménez-Gaona, Oscar Vivanco-Galván, Gonzalo Morales-Larreategui, Andrea Cabrera-Bejarano, Vasudevan Lakshminarayanan Abstract: This paper analyzes the use of ivermectin-based antiparasitic as a cancer treatment in the rural area of the Loja province, Ecuador, and the medical opinion regarding its use in humans. Drug repurposing of ivermectin abrogates neutrophil extracellular traps and prevents melanoma metastasis (PDF) Publication Date: 2022-09-05 Authors: Hongjun Zhang, Xiaozhuo Xu, Rui Xu, T. Ye Abstract: This study identifies Ivermectin (IVM) as significantly inhibiting neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) formation and preventing melanoma metastasis, with a focus on its effects on myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and CD8+T cells in a mouse melanoma model. Ivermectin: recent approaches in the design of novel veterinary and human medicines Publication Date: 2022-09-05 Authors: M. C. Velho, Diego Fontana de Andrade, R. Beck Abstract: This review discusses strategies proposed in the last decade to improve the safety and efficacy of Ivermectin and to explore its novel therapeutic applications, including in cancer and viral infections. Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via mitochondrial dysfunction (PDF) Publication Date: 2022-08-26 Authors: D. Lee, H. Kang, So Yi Kim, Myeong Jin Kim, Jae Woong Jeong, Woosol Chris Hong, S. Fang, Hyung Sun Kim, Yun-Sun Lee, H. Kim, Joon Seong Park Abstract: This study evaluates the anticancer effects of the combination of ivermectin and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, indicating that ivermectin exerts synergistic effects with gemcitabine, preventing pancreatic cancer progression. Forging Ahead the Repositioning of Multitargeted Drug Ivermectin Publication Date: 2022-05-16 Authors: S. Atmakuri, Shweta Nene, D. Khatri, S. B. Singh, V. Sinha, Saurabh Srivastava Abstract: This review highlights the role of Ivermectin in unexplored avenues towards the repositioning of this multitargeted drug in cancer, viral, and bacterial infection, and malaria, providing insights into regulatory considerations of drug repurposing and current formulation strategies. Ivermectin and gemcitabine combination treatment enhances antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer through mitochondria dysfunction (PDF) Publication Date: 2022-04-30 Authors: Daeun Lee, H. Kang, So Yi Kim, Myeong Jin Kim, Y. Lee, Hyung Sun Kim, Jung Min Lee, H. Kim, Joon Seong Park Abstract: This study explores the combination of Ivermectin and gemcitabine in enhancing the antitumor effect in pancreatic cancer, focusing on mitochondria dysfunction. Topical ivermectin: an off-label alternative to treat neonatal Scabies in the era of permethrin resistance Publication Date: 2022-02-21 Authors: A. Bassi, V. Piccolo, G. Argenziano, C. Mazzatenta Abstract: This article discusses the use of topical ivermectin as an off-label alternative for treating neonatal Scabies, focusing on the era of permethrin resistance. Repurposing Ivermectin to augment chemotherapy’s efficacy in osteosarcoma Publication Date: 2022-01-01 Authors: B. Hu, H. Tan, L. Yu, Q. Liao, W. Guo Abstract: This research investigates the potential of repurposing Ivermectin to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in osteosarcoma, focusing on its effects on proliferation, migration, and apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. Ivermectin induces apoptosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma via mitochondrial pathway (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-12-01 Authors: Nana Xu, Mengmeng Lu, Jiaxin Wang, Yujia Li, Xiaotian Yang, Xiaoshuang Wei, J-L Si, Jingru Han, Xiaojuan Yao, Juanmei Zhang, Junqi Liu, Yanming Li, Hushan Yang, D. Bao Abstract: This study examines the induction of apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by Ivermectin, focusing on the mitochondrial pathway. Progress in Redirecting Antiparasitic Drugs for Cancer Treatment (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-06-01 Authors: Haoyang Huang, Qing He, Binghua Guo, Xudong Xu, Yinjuan Wu, Xue-Rong Li Abstract: This review discusses the redirection of conventional drugs, including Ivermectin, into cancer treatment, focusing on their anticancer potentials and underlying mechanisms. Computational Drug Repositioning and Experimental Validation of Ivermectin in Treatment of Gastric Cancer (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-03-31 Authors: Hanne-Line Rabben, G. Andersen, Aleksandr Ianevski, M. K. Olsen, D. Kainov, J. Grønbech, T. Wang, Duan Chen, Chun-Mei Zhao Abstract: This study focuses on the repositioning of Ivermectin in the treatment of gastric cancer, combining computational predictions with in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches. Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-03-02 Authors: Dobrin D. Draganov, Z. Han, A. Rana, Nitasha R. Bennett, D. Irvine, Peter P. Lee Abstract: This research shows that Ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death and enhances T cell infiltration into breast tumors, demonstrating synergy with immune checkpoint blockade. Antiviral Drug Ivermectin at Nanomolar Concentrations Inhibits Glycine-Induced Chloride Current in Rat Hippocampal Neurons (PDF) Publication Date: 2021-03-01 Authors: J. Bukanova, E. Solntseva, R. Kondratenko, V. Skrebitsky Abstract: This study examines the effect of Ivermectin on chloride currents in rat hippocampal neurons, contributing to the understanding of its potential use in cancer treatment. Quantitative proteomics reveals a broad-spectrum antiviral property of ivermectin, benefiting for COVID-19 treatment (PDF) Publication Date: 2020-09-22 Authors: Na Li, Lingfeng Zhao, X. Zhan Abstract: This study identifies ivermectin-related virus infection pathway alterations in human ovarian cancer cells, revealing its broad-spectrum antiviral property, including against COVID-19. Ivermectin converts cold tumors hot and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade for treatment of breast cancer (PDF) Publication Date: 2020-08-24 Authors: Dobrin D. Draganov, Z. Han, A. Rana, Nitasha R. Bennett, D. Irvine, Peter P. Lee Abstract: This research demonstrates how Ivermectin induces immunogenic cancer cell death and enhances T cell infiltration into breast tumors, showing synergy with immune checkpoint blockade. Antitumor effects of ivermectin at clinically feasible concentrations support its clinical development as a repositioned cancer drug Publication Date: 2020-05-30 Authors: M. Juárez, Alejandro Schcolnik-Cabrera, G. Domínguez-Gómez, A. Chávez-Blanco, J. Díaz-Chávez, A. Dueñas-González Abstract: This article supports the clinical development of Ivermectin as a repositioned cancer drug, highlighting its antitumor effects at clinically feasible concentrations. Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin (PDF) Publication Date: 2020-01-01 Authors: Jian Liu, Kun Zhang, Lin Cheng, He Zhu, Tianmin Xu Abstract: This review summarizes the antitumor effects of Ivermectin and its potential roles in cancer treatment, including its impact on various pathways and cellular functions. I could have kept going but I cut it off after 20 results. I also asked it to sort the results by date with newest first, and we ended with 1/1/2020, which means these 20 articles all came out within the last 3 years. How many more do we have in the past decade or two? A lot. Now here's my original report which gives you a ton more information: Can Ivermectin Treat Cancer? New Evidence Might Surprise You! Let's get something out of the way right up front in this article.... I'm not a doctor. I'm not even a scientist. Nothing in this article has been evaluated or approved by the FDA -- but let's be honest, that probably just means you should pay EXTRA attention to it, right? Ok, we all good with the disclaimer? Great! I'm a reporter and I report on what I see.... And right now I'm seeing a ton of people talking about Ivermectin as a possible treatment for cancer. Let me give a SECOND disclaimer: do NOT read this article and stop taking cancer treatments or stop doing what your doctor tells you to do. Listen to you doctor! But....Ivermectin has been called a "Wonder Drug" (more on that in a minute) and NINE new scientific, peer-reviewed studies are showing it may be effective in treating or curing cancer....AND it's safer that Aspirin! So if it were me, and I can only tell you what I would do, but if it were me or one of my family members, we'd listen to our doctor but I think I'd also be taking a high dose of Ivermectin on the side. Read this for more on how incredibly SAFE Ivermectin is: INVESTIGATION: Can You OVERDOSE On Ivermectin? Now let's dig in and I'll show you everything I'm seeing about Ivermectin and Cancer... We start on Twitter but we will end with peer-reviewed, scientific studies. Nine of them, to be exact. Let's start here: https://twitter.com/StewVet/status/1711943721430729088 Once again, I can only talk about what I would do, but I'm considering going on a high dose Ivermectin treatment once per year as preventative medicine: Believe it or not, high-dose Ivermectin may very well cure cancer.https://t.co/vwUCWFVqFM pic.twitter.com/OsTXkc90wX — HatRabbit ??? (@HatRabbit17) October 7, 2023 And is this why Big Pharma hates it so much? Knew it. I said this well over a year ago. How many times did I tell people to search the NIH site for "ivermectin and cancer" & then read the many the peer reviewed papers? #Ivermectin kills tumors. And cancer. @AprilHunter pic.twitter.com/bIYi6ADs1L — RealAprilHunter (@realaprilhunter) October 4, 2023 Now let's get scientific.... You know, REAL science, not "Fauci-ism". From The Journal of Antibiotics, published 2/15/17: Read the full article yourself here. "...unmatched value of an extraordinary drug..." "...Antibacterial, antiviral and anti-cancer agent..." Folks, that isn't my take or someone on Twitter or TikTok. That is a medical journal. Let's do another one.... From PubMed: Read the full article yourself here. "...led many to describe it as a 'wonder' drug." Let's do another... From the NIH.gov: Read the full article here. "...powerful antitumor effects...in a variety of cancer cells." I repeat, this is not MY opinion, this is a medical journal! In fact, there are MANY articles that all come to the same conclusion, across multiple different types of cancers. Can Ivermectin Treat “Turbo Cancers”? - 9 Ivermectin Papers Reviewed The drug once labeled “horse de-wormer” is now showing AT LEAST 15 anti-cancer mechanisms of action.https://t.co/Nt6kr0j8VH — Vigilant Fox (@VigilantFox) October 10, 2023 Here are 9 of them, from VigilantNews: Papers reviewed: 2023 Sep.23 - Man-Yuan Li et al - Ivermectin induces nonprotective autophagy by downregulating PAK1 and apoptosis in lungadenocarcinoma cells 2023 May - Samy et al - Eprinomectin: a derivative of ivermectin suppresses growth and metastatic phenotypes of prostatecancer cells by targeting the β-catenin signaling pathway 2022 Nov - Lotfalizadeh et al - The Anticancer potential of Ivermectin: Mechanisms of action and therapeutic implications 2022 Oct - Jian Liu et al - Progress in Understanding the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Antitumour Effects of Ivermectin 2022 Jun - Daeun Lee et al - Ivermectin suppresses pancreatic cancer via mitochondria dysfunction 2021 Aug - Shican Zhou et al - Ivermectin has New Application in Inhibiting Colorectal Cancer Cell Growth 2021 Jan - Mingyang Tang et al - Ivermectin, a potential anticancer drug derived from an antiparasitic drug 2019 Sep Intuyod et al - Anti-parasitic Drug Ivermectin Exhibits Potent Anticancer Activity Against Gemcitabine-resistant Cholangiocarcinoma In Vitro 2018 Feb - Juarez et al - The multitargeted drug ivermectin: from an antiparasitic agent to a repositioned cancer drug You can see that FULL article over on MakisMD Substack here. Now for the most obvious question: Need LEGAL and SAFE Ivermectin? Read This! We just reported yesterday that a new leaked report says airlines are looking to BRING BACK MASKS in October. Yes, really. I fully expect a new "planned-demic" will show up right in time for the 2024 election. Oh they might not call it "COVID" again and probably they won't. But I fully expect a new one to hit. And I'm going to be prepared this time. Whether it comes in the form of a bioweapon or something much more mundane like a tick bite or a Bill Gates' mosquito – you and your family need to be prepared. That’s where The Wellness Company comes in. You know the Wellness Company and their great doctors – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Jim Thorp – are regularly in the media speaking out against the broken medical establishment. Dr. Thorp, one of the nation’s leading critics of the corrupting influence of big pharma, believes that now – more than ever – people should be prepared for the next pandemic. “I’ve strongly recommended “stock piling” critical medications including antibiotics since the turn of the century. This has been an incredible investment as many friends, family and patients have benefited.  Now, in summer of 2023, this recommendation is even more crucial.” – Dr. Jim Thorp The Wellness Company and their doctors are medical professionals that you can trust and their new medical emergency kits are the gold standard when it comes to keeping you safe and healthy. Be ready for anything, this medical emergency kit contains an assortment of live-saving medications – including ivermectin and Z-pak. The medical emergency kit provides a guidebook to aid in the safe use of all of these life-saving medications. From anthrax to tick bites to COVID and even to a bioweapon like the plague – the Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency kit is exactly what you need to have on hand to be prepared. Rest assured knowing that you have emergency antibiotics, antivirals and anti-parasitics on hand to help keep you and your family safe from whatever the globalists throw at us next! The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit includes:  Amoxicillin-Clavulanate (generic Augmentin) 875/125 mg - 28 tablets Azithromycin (generic Z-Pak) 250 mg - 12 tablets Doxycycline Hyclate 100 mg - 60 capsules Metronidazole (generic Flagyl) 500 mg - 30 tablets Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole (generic Bactrim) 800/160 mg - 28 tablets Ivermectin 18mg - 7 compounded capsules Fluconazole (generic Diflucan) 150 mg - 2 tablets Ondansetron (generic Zofran) 4mg - 6 tablets 1 virtual consult from a doctor you can trust 1 Emergency Medication Guidebook written by our Chief Medical Board for safe use. The Wellness Company Medical Emergency Kit treats: Anthrax Bacterial Vaginosis Bite Wounds Bronchitis Chlamydia Clostridioides difficile Colitis COVID - 19 Gonorrhea Giardiasis Lice Nausea & Vomiting Pharyngitis Pinworms Plague (bioterror) Pneumonia Rickettsial Infections Scabies Shigella Infection Sinusitis Skin Infection Strep Throat Syphilis Tetanus Tick Exposure Tonsillitis Traveler’s Diarrhea Trichomoniasis Tularemia (bioterror) Urinary Tract Infection Vaginal Candidiasis Viral Upper Respiratory Infection Don’t be caught unprepared. Don’t be reliant on the broken and corrupt medical industrial complex. Don’t regret not acting today. Order The Wellness Company’s Medical Emergency Kits today! (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message below and ordering through the links below, which benefits WLT Report. We appreciate your support!) RELATED: We Were RIGHT About Ivermectin From Day One! PAGING DOCTOR FLIP-FLOP! DOCTOR FLIP-FLOP, PLEASE REPORT TO THE OPERATING ROOM! In a 180 degree flip-flop a politician would be jealous of, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) now admits doctors can prescribe Ivermectin to treat COVID-19. Yes, really. During the COVID-19 plandemic, the FDA did everything possible to prevent doctors from prescribing the antiviral to treat COVID-19. The corrupt agency compared people seeking ivermectin to horses. The federal government, mainstream media, Big Tech, and pharmacies created numerous barriers to prevent COVID-19 patients from obtaining ivermectin for treatment. After millions of Americans lined up to take the experimental COVID-19 shots, the FDA changed course to say doctors can prescribe ivermectin for COVID-19. Straight from the horse’s mouth. Now time for @US_FDA to issue a statement so my patients can get their prescriptions filled at @cvspharmacy and @Walgreens.https://t.co/r5khovfAfe — Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MaryBowdenMD) August 11, 2023 According to The Epoch Times, the "'FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID,' Ashley Cheung Honold, a Department of Justice lawyer representing the FDA, said during oral arguments on Aug. 8 in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit." "FDA explicitly recognizes that doctors do have the authority to prescribe ivermectin to treat COVID." Doctors are free to prescribe #Ivermectin to treat #COVID19, a lawyer representing the #FDA said this week. https://t.co/2IaViQTfjX — The Epoch Times (@EpochTimes) August 10, 2023 From The Epoch Times: The government is defending the FDA's repeated exhortations to people to not take ivermectin for COVID-19, including a post that said "Stop it." The case was brought by three doctors who allege the FDA unlawfully interfered with their practice of medicine with the statements. A federal judge dismissed the case in 2022, prompting an appeal. "The fundamental issue in this case is straightforward. After the FDA approves the human drug for sale, does it then have the authority to interfere with how that drug is used within the doctor-patient relationship? The answer is no," Jared Kelson, representing the doctors, told the appeals court. The FDA explicitly stated that ivermectin "isn’t authorized or approved to treat COVID-19." However, the agency attempted to excuse its corruption. "FDA made these statements in response to multiple reports of consumers being hospitalized, after self medicating with ivermectin intended for horses, which is available for purchase over the counter without the need for prescription," Honold said. In an interview with Maria Bartiromo, Senator Ron Johnson described the destruction caused by the actions of the FDA. "The doctors I've been dealing with and talking to for yours now, they believe that probably hundreds of thousands of Americans lost their lives because they were denied early treatment," Johnson said. "And they were denied it because the FDA sabotaged, for example, ivermectin. And they said, come on, you all, you're not a cow, you're not a horse. You know, this is supposedly horse medicine. No, this was a Nobel Prize-winning medicine that could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives." WATCH: The FDA has now endorsed treating COVID with Ivermectin! The FDA has blood on its hands. How many Americans senselessly died because Big Medicine called this cheap, readily available Nobel Prize winning medicine horse paste? Thank you Ron Johnson your leadership and bravery. pic.twitter.com/m0d6EonC5Q — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) August 11, 2023 Read more from the court exchange from The Epoch Times: Ms. Honold said that the FDA didn't purport to require anyone to do anything or to prohibit anyone from doing anything. "What about when it said, 'No, stop it'?" Circuit Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod, on the panel that is hearing the appeal, asked. "Why isn't that a command? If you were in English class, they would say that was a command." Ms. Honold described the statements as "merely quips." "Can you answer the question, please? Is that a command, 'Stop it'?" Judge Elrod asked. "In some contexts, those words could be construed as a command," Ms. Honold said. "But in this context, where FDA was simply using these words in the context of a quippy tweet meant to share its informational article, those statements do not rise to the level of a command." The statements "don't prohibit doctors from prescribing ivermectin to treat COVID or for any other purpose" Ms. Honold said. She noted that the FDA, along with the statements, said that people should consult their health care providers about COVID-19 treatments and that they could take medicine if it was prescribed by the provider. "FDA is clearly acknowledging that doctors have the authority to prescribe human ivermectin to treat COVID. So they are not interfering with the authority of doctors to prescribe drugs or to practice medicine," she said. We actually told you all of this YEARS ago! Our reporting has been spot on from Day 1, nice to see the FDA catching up to us, but very sad it took so long. Here is one of our prior reports: CONFIRMED: The True Story of Ivermectin Now Coming Out! I continue to bring you the REAL news about Ivermectin.... Real, unfiltered news with no bias. Just the facts, ma'am! Like this one for example: Two Separate Doctors Claim OVER 100 Members of Congress Treated With Ivermectin! Anyone else mad yet? But here's the deal... Now the FDA is backtracking big time, trying to claim they never said you couldn't take Ivermectin. Yes, really...hard to even believe! But it's true, look at this: The scumbags are backtracking. They knew all along Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine prevented covid. But the drug dealers would not making hundreds of billions on these functional drugs. So they poisoned billions of people with the mRNA test drug. Crimes against humanity. https://t.co/nia76r41lW — Phenix Evely, PhD (@evely_phenix) November 22, 2022 And this: I'm not making accusations. This will all come out in the wash eventually. The FDA in the US is already backtracking by claiming that when they said don't use ivermectin it was only a "suggestion." — Other Heather dot connectr ...... (@thedotconnectr) December 12, 2022 They knew all along: https://twitter.com/wolsned/status/1603157314147868672 In fact, some studies are now showing it MIGHT be highly effective at destroying cancer: The horse dewormer strikes again. https://t.co/6qofYPNGHV — Dr. Urso (@richardursomd) December 15, 2022 Catturd right again: Remember when they said Ivermectin was only horse paste - and the low IQ, anti-science, useful idiots clapped like trained government seals. — Catturd (@catturd2) December 14, 2022 A wave of truth is coming out: The FDA’s website states, “Currently available data do not show ivermectin is effective against #COVID19.” But half of the studies to which the FDA points support using #ivermectine against #COVID_19, an @EpochTimes review (by @ZackStieber) has foundhttps://t.co/9DImZ7kvah — Jan Jekielek (@JanJekielek) December 11, 2022 Here is Dr. Peter McCullough: #BREAKING: Dr. Peter McCullough says the FDA acted criminally and should be sued for misleading the public by spreading misinformation on Ivermectin's ability to treat Covid-19 - causing unnecessary death. pic.twitter.com/Bg3ZS756tc — govt.exe is corrupt (@govt_corrupt) December 16, 2022 Just remember we told you the TRUTH all along... They didn't want you to see this but we showed you from Day 1! Watch it here on Rumble: Remember this disclaimer: I am not a doctor.  I am not giving you medical advice.  I’m a REPORTER.  I research and I report and I give you the full story open and honestly so YOU can decide. Now let's go to another video. This woman below documented her own journey with Ivermectin on video. She starts off looking not so good but makes a swift turnaround in just a few days. This is not me talking, listen to her share and document her own story.... Here is the video from Rumble: Now let's talk about the MSM disinformation campaign, which is a nice way of saying "outright lies and propaganda". Look, I will give you one disclaimer before we get started:  I am a journalist and not anyone with any medical expertise.  I'm not a doctor and I'm not giving medical advice.   I'm just presenting you with the results of my research that the MSM really seems to want to hide.... And I know how to do my research. So let's start with this: Now let's unpack all the lies the MSM has been telling you about Ivermectin. You would assume based on all the MSM propaganda that Ivermectin is only approved for Horses and not Humans. The only problem with that? It's not true. Not even close. Here's the real truth: Yes folks, that is a statement taken from PolitiFact's very own fact-checking page about Ivermectin. But what they do with their "Face Check" is so insidious.... Here's how PolitiFact tries to claim that the TRUE statement is still somehow false, watch these mental gymnastics: This post was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) It is true that ivermectin was approved by the Food and Drug Administration that year — but not to treat the coronavirus. The drug was approved for strongyloidiasis, a disease caused by a roundworm, and onchocerciasis, or river blindness, which is caused by a parasitic worm. The drug was approved for humans under the brand name Stromectol, National Geographic reported, and since then it’s been recognized as a safe treatment for several tropical diseases caused by parasites. In 2015, two scientists even won a Nobel Prize for their discovery of ivermectin and its use to treat diseases caused by parasites. But unlike, say, river blindness, COVID-19 is caused by a coronavirus, not by parasites. And as PolitiFact recently reported in a story exploring ivermectin, there’s no conclusive evidence that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The lying and the deception is just so evil, really makes me angry. If you gave me a full year, I couldn't come up with all the twists and turns these people take to turn the TRUTH into a lie. It's sickening. But we're just getting started. Next come the scare tactics and VERY misleading headlines. Like this article from WIVB Channel 4 News: After a recent resurgence in several states, health officials are warning residents to be aware of a dangerous of an unauthorized “treatment” for COVID-19 — often being taken with dangerous consequences. It’s called ivermectin and it’s used to treat and prevent parasites in animals, the Food and Drug Administration explains. The tablets are not FDA approved for treatment of COVID-19 in humans and isn’t even an anti-viral drug — meaning it has no impact on the coronavirus. And because the large-concentration tablets are intended for large animals, these can be treacherous for humans. In addition to not being authorized for treatment, there’s no evidence ivermectin treats COVID-19. “There’s a lot of misinformation around, and you may have heard that it’s okay to take large doses of ivermectin. That is wrong.” FDA The FDA and several state officials say they’ve seen an uptick in calamitous use of the drugs, particularly tablets used to treat parasitic worms in horses. While ivermectin is approved for humans to treat certain skin conditions (rosacea) and certain external parasites like head lice, the FDA warns this ivermectin is different than the one used in animals. On Friday, the Mississippi Department of Health was forced to send out a warning to residents about the dangers of the drug after several poisonings. The Mississippi Poison Control Center said at least 70% of recent ivermectin-related calls are tied to people taking livestock or animal formulations they bought a livestock supply stores or through online markets. Eighty-five percent of callers had mild symptoms — these include rash, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain — but one person needed evaluation because of how much they’d taken. More severe dangers of ivermectin ingestion include neurologic disorders, seizures, coma and death. Use of ivermectin should only be taken if prescribed by a doctor for an FDA-approved use. Regardless of the usage and prescription, the FDA warns ivermectin overdose is still possible. Possible interaction with other medications is also a possibility. I highlighted the key parts. A 70% SURGE in Ivermectin Poison Center calls sounds like a lot doesn't it? NPR even reports a 245% surge!  Oh my! Sounds bad until you realize according to NPR that the 245% surge is going from 133 calls to 459 calls....NATIONWIDE! According to the National Poison Data System (NPDS), which collects information from the nation's 55 poison control centers, there was a 245% jump in reported exposure cases from July to August — from 133 to 459. Yes folks, out of 333 MILLION people, there were 459 calls to poison centers. So 0.00000137% of the population. And those are just calls. According to the bold part of the Channel 4 article, 85% of those people who called or had symptoms had MILD symptoms like a rash. The horror! According to the article, only ONE person needed a further evaluation. But is this what you hear in the MSM? No. If you listed only to the MSM fear-porn, you'd think we had a crisis of Ivermectin deaths. The truth is the polar opposite. Anyone else REALLY tired of being lied to? It's why I'm here. I will continue to shout the truth from the rooftops! But I'm not done yet. Did you know that Ivermectin has actually been listed even by the corrupt WHO as one of the most "essential medicines" out there? It's true, you can read it right here until they take it down. But I'm not done yet! Let's cut right to the chase and go to a medical journal to see the true toxicity data on Ivermectin in humans. Seems like something JOURNALISTS should do, don't you think? Let's go to INCHEM.org, the WHO's own website for "Internationally Peer Reviewed Chemical Safety Information". They lay it out in black and white and even a non-medical person like me can understand it. Now let's go down to Section 7.2 of their report which is about Toxicity in Humans: I'm going to bold the key part: 7.2 Toxicity 7.2.1 Human data 7.2.1.1 Adults Amounts approaching the therapeutic doses in animals (100 to 200 ðg/kg bodyweight) are not hazardous to humans. Ingestions of large quantities (10 to 100 times the animal therapeutic dosage) may produce symptoms resembling those observed in animal toxicology studies at high toxic levels. An adult female accidentally self-injected a small quantity (approximately 200 ðg/kg) subcutaneously. Twelve hours later she experienced colicky pain with nausea but recovered within 12 hours (MSD, 1988). Clinical studies of oral ivermectin given in doses from 2 to 200 ðg/kg (maximum 12 mg) have shown a pattern of adverse experiences that included only one serious event (transient stupor). The remaining adverse experiences were considered not serious and were chiefly of the type expected based on the characteristics of the underlying disease and the responses seen after treatment with other microfilaricidal drugs, except for reports of "depression" (not psychiatrically tested) in four patients in open studies (MSD, 1988). 7.2.1.2 Children A 16-month-old boy weighing 15 kg ingested approximately 100 to 130 mg of ivermectin (as an injectable solution). Ten hours post-ingestion he had mydriasis in one pupil, with frequent vomiting, pallor, 35°C temperature, tachycardia, somnolence and variable blood pressure. He developed urticaria the following day, and had recovered after three days (MSD, 1988). Let's start with the very first line: even if you take the ANIMAL dosage, it is "not hazardous to humans". Case closed folks. Seriously, why is this not front page news? Is it because Ivermectin WORKS and actually treats COVID-19 and they can't let that happen? Just asking. How soon will it be do you think before they take down the WHO website or "edit" it? Good thing I took screenshots! Ok, now to address the question everyone is asking: how can I get it? Here is a new update from the FLCCC, which stands for Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. From their page "Prevention and Treatment Protocols" I give you the following: I also highlight their disclaimer: And then you can TAP HERE to get the full list of doctors who can assist you. And if that doesn't work, I have a second source. Let's go to America's Frontline Doctors, who as their name suggests, are on the frontline of this battle. They took an oath to heal their patients and they believe many of the things the MSM wants to scare you away from may actually help heal you. Not my words, theirs.....take a look: From their website: Tap here to go to their site. And here is even more, also from America's Frontline Doctors..... Here is a graphic that has been circulating: And now let's go right to their website.... Here is what they're calling their Wellness Protocol and it sure seems very normal and common sense to me, how about you? Then we have their Treatment Options, which again look very reasonable. Folks, I'm not going to tell you what to do or not do, you have to make up your own mind and consult with your own doctor. But as a non-medical person, doesn't this stuff sound like a good idea? And here it is in a diagram: I will reiterate here once again what they posted on their website: THIS IS NOT MEDICAL ADVICE. Every situation is unique and every person must check with his or her own physician, especially if you are taking any other medication. Good advice.  For everyone. If you are interested in where to buy some of these items, scroll down and I have links for you to some of the best ones. Want even more? Then you need to hear from my friend Chris Burres who joined me last weekend on my show to talk about the power of C60. No, he's not saying it treats COVID or cures COVID. But he is saying it appears to supercharge your immune system and help your body in many different ways.....anyone else interested in that? Me too, and that's why I had him on my show. I had a lot of questions for him about C60 and I found the whole thing fascinating! Yes, I (Noah) personally take C60 and I've been taking it for over a year now. I first started hearing about it online about a year ago and I did my own research on it to find out what it is, where can I get it, and is it really that good....? First, let me give you my disclaimer once again in bold font: I'm not a doctor and I'm not giving you medical advice.  I'm not telling you this is going to treat or cure any condition you have.  I'm just telling you what I have personally experienced.  So here's what I found. I found that C60 is a powerful antioxidant often described as the "perfect carbon molecule". It's an antioxidant that has been measured to be 172x more powerful than Vitamin C!  How about that? Not only is it an antioxidant, but it's an anti-viral and an anti-bacterial and an anti-inflammatory. I'll tell you this....ever since I saw the Deep State going after Carbon and trying to tax carbon emissions with their Al-Gore Carbon Tax, I immediately knew one thing:  I bet Carbon is actually pretty good for you! Turns out I was right. Especially the Carbon-60 "perfect carbon molecule." So once I learned more about it, I then set out to find where to buy it from the most reputable company. I found there are a lot of companies selling C60 that might actually be bad for you and toxic, so I found the one that has the highest standards and safest, most continually-tested product out there....and that was C60 Evo. I've been personally taking C60 for over a year and feel amazing so in light of all the health issues plaguing our nation right now, I decided I'd have one of the founders of the company on my show to break all this down. Chris Burres was kind enough to speak with me today (on a weekend) and I thought it was a WONDERFUL discussion! I learned a lot myself.... He explains what C60 is, why its discovery won a Nobel prize, and the benefits many people experience when taking it. I believe in this product so much after using it for a year I asked the company if I could actually become an affiliate and get all of you a discount.... And they agreed! So watch the video below and then scroll down to grab my code which will get you 10% if you want to try it. Watch here on Rumble: To visit their website go to https://www.c60evo.com/welovetrump/ Use promo code EVNOAH to save 10%. Backup here on YouTube: To visit their website go to https://www.c60evo.com/welovetrump/ Use promo code EVNOAH to save 10%. Want even more on an immune-boosting health plan? Look no further than my friend Clif High. Clif has routinely promoted C60 in the past and here is even more of what he recommends. Take a look: Vaxx repair protocol... pic.twitter.com/stvjmbbCmn — clif is antiselenite (@clif_high) August 11, 2021 If that Tweet gets taken down, here is a screenshot of what he posted: I'm going to give you my disclaimer once again..... DISCLAIMER: I'm not a doctor and I don't practice medicine. And neither is Clif! Neither of us is giving you medical advice. Ok? Ok. I'm just reporting on what others have said. But let's be honest....I think I can probably do better than the "doctors" like Dr. Fraudci, Dr. Birxx who lie to you and serve you up a big heaping pile of propaganda! You can probably take whatever they tell you to do and just do the opposite and you'd probably be pretty close to an ideal course of action! So no, I'm not a doctor, but if being a doctor puts you in the same class as Dr. FRAUDci, then I take not being a doctor as a badge of honor. I'm a reporter. I simply report what I hear and see from others. To paraphrase a once great network: I report, you decide! But what I can report is that it sure looks like some very basic stuff can drastically help you recover and protect your body going forward! Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Chaga Mushroom Tea, C60, and of course hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin may be highly effective! If you scroll down, I have links for you. And let's consider the worst case scenario.....taking more vitamins is almost never a bad thing, right? Your body needs them regardless of what virus is floating around out there. As long as you don't take too much of the fat-soluble vitamins, it's almost NEVER a bad thing to give your body more vitamins. Now let me give you a little more background on Clif and why he's making these recommendations.... Watch this video where Clif High explains what the spike protein is actually doing to your body, why it is definitely a bio-weapon, and how each of the items listed above can help: [iframe src="https://www.bitchute.com/embed/sbls9aO7kys6/" width="100%" height="360"] Here is one more where he goes into even more detail and in this one he talks about the power of C60 and why you need to get some! Ever since you were a kid, you were told to get your vitamins! It's basic advice that was good then and is still good now! You need large doses of the right kind of Vitamin C, 10-15,000 IU's of Vitamin D to maintain certain blood levels, and then Clif recommends C60 too. Watch the interview here from Rumble (they discuss it in the first 10 minutes) and then scroll down for links to where you can get the best of each item: If you want to follow Clif's advice, here are some links to the products I like to use. Unfortunately, I can't give you a link to NAC on Amazon because Amazon banned it. One of the oldest and most trusted supplements in the bodybuilding industry and Amazon suddenly banned it right now. Interesting. So we go with the rest of the list.... First is Glutathione: You want to get "Liposomal" Vitamin C, very important. And in case that sells out, which tends to happen, this is another good Liposomal Vitamin C: Now on to Vitamin D. Here is my current favorite and the one I personally take: And a backup Vitamin D3: And Chaga Mushroom Tea: And here is the Zinc Balance: And we end with C60. As I mentioned above, I've been personally taking C60 for over a year and I have not came down with COVID.  Not saying it treats or prevents COVID, I'm just saying my experience. Regardless of COVID, I love taking it and have noticed multiple benefits. Here's what many people have reported: C60 is a powerful antioxidant (172x the power of Vitamin C), antiviral, antibacterial and anti-inflammatory.  I liked it so much I actually contacted the company and got everyone who is reading this a deal. The company is called C60Evo. Go to their website here and then be sure to use promo code EVNOAH and you'll get 10% off your order! I love this stuff and I think you will too. Cheers to good health and a big thank you to Clif High for putting out this information! No, I'm not promising you won't get COVID, but I am saying that TAKING YOUR VITAMINS and powerful ANTIOXIDANTS is a good idea! Be smart. Be safe. Be healthy!

Man who called Tesla before it soared 2,150%… Now sees something 14X bigger than ChatGPT
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Man who called Tesla before it soared 2,150%… Now sees something 14X bigger than ChatGPT

For the past two years, AI has been trapped inside our computers… Chatbots like ChatGPT. Image generators. Voice assistants. All impressive… but all confined to our digital screens. That’s about to change in a big way. Jeff Brown — the tech veteran who spotted Tesla and Nvidia years before they exploded — says AI is about to make its “great escape” into the physical world. And it’s happening as soon as January 29. “This isn’t just another software update,” says Jeff. “We’re witnessing AI take physical form for the first time in history.” And this former senior executive who helped grow THREE $50+ billion tech companies believes this “AI exodus” will create massive returns for early investors who position themselves now. In fact, he’s found one stock that is 168 times SMALLER than NVIDIA… But is ultimately responsible for bringing “Manifested AI” to life before our very eyes. Click here to see Jeff’s full briefing on this urgent situation. Because after January 29, the ground-floor opportunity could be gone. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)

Here Is The EXACT U.S. Code Section We Can Use To ARREST Gov. Tim Walz!
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Here Is The EXACT U.S. Code Section We Can Use To ARREST Gov. Tim Walz!

Would you like to see MN Gov. Tim Walz arrested? In prison? Prosecuted for Treason? Well, I have good news for you…. The law to do such a thing is already on the books and we just need to follow it. That’s not just my opinion, Elon Musk just gave it his seal of approval earlier today. It’s 18 U.S.C. 666, what an interesting number, and seemingly very aptly fitting! Absolutely https://t.co/FPoKRgRyx1 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 2, 2026 But we do our homework around here and we don’t take anything posted online at face value, even if it comes from Elon Musk. So now allow me to back up these claims with real research. Analysis: Can this statute be used to arrest state governors for misuse of federal funds? Yes, in principle, it can be used if the specific elements of the crime are met. Broad Definition of Agent: The statute explicitly applies to agents of a State government (not just agencies), and the definition of “agent” in subsection (d)(1) is broad: it includes officers, employees, directors, managers, representatives, etc., authorized to act on behalf of the government. Governor Status: A state governor is the chief executive officer of the state and clearly qualifies as an “agent” of the state government under this definition. Federal Funding Threshold: All U.S. states receive far more than $10,000 annually in federal funds (via grants, highway funds, Medicaid, etc.), satisfying subsection (b). Scope of Property: The prohibited conduct includes intentionally misapplying property valued at $5,000 or more that is owned by or under the care/custody/control of the state (subsection (a)(1)(A)). Importantly, the property does not need to be federal funds themselves—misuse of any state-controlled property qualifies as long as the state receives the requisite federal benefits. Closing Legal Gaps: This statute was enacted to close gaps in federal law and allow prosecution of corruption/theft in federally funded programs at the state and local level, even without tracing misuse directly to federal dollars. Jurisdiction and Application: Federal prosecutors (via the DOJ/FBI) have jurisdiction over violations of this statute, and it has been used against high-level state and local officials for corruption or theft involving entities receiving federal funds. While no widely known cases directly involve a sitting governor under § 666 specifically, the statutory language and legal interpretations (including DOJ guidance and court rulings) support its applicability to governors or similarly positioned elected officials if they personally engage in the prohibited acts. Practical Considerations: In practice, such cases would require strong evidence of criminal intent, and prosecutions of governors are rare due to political sensitivities, but the law itself permits it for qualifying “misuse.” And I also want to post the full text of the statute so you have it handy. Not my summary or interpretation of it, just the full text: 18 U.S. Code § 666 – Theft or Bribery Concerning Programs Receiving Federal Funds (a) Prohibited Conduct Whoever, if the circumstance described in subsection (b) of this section exists— ** (1) being an agent of an organization, or of a State, local, or Indian tribal government, or any agency thereof—** (A) embezzles, steals, obtains by fraud, or otherwise without authority knowingly converts to the use of any person other than the rightful owner or intentionally misapplies, property that— (i) is valued at $5,000 or more, and (ii) is owned by, or is under the care, custody, or control of such organization, government, or agency;  (B) corruptly solicits or demands for the benefit of any person, or accepts or agrees to accept, anything of value from any person, intending to be influenced or rewarded in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of such organization, government, or agency involving any thing of value of $5,000 or more; or (2) corruptly gives, offers, or agrees to give anything of value to any person, with intent to influence or reward an agent of an organization or of a State, local or Indian tribal government, or any agency thereof, in connection with any business, transaction, or series of transactions of such organization, government, or agency involving anything of value of $5,000 or more; shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both. (b) Qualifying Circumstances The circumstance referred to in subsection (a) of this section is that the organization, government, or agency receives, in any one year period, benefits in excess of $10,000 under a Federal program involving a grant, contract, subsidy, loan, guarantee, insurance, or other form of Federal assistance. (c) Exemptions This section does not apply to bona fide salary, wages, fees, or other compensation paid, or expenses paid or reimbursed, in the usual course of business. (d) Definitions As used in this section— (1) Agent: means a person authorized to act on behalf of another person or a government and, in the case of an organization or government, includes a servant or employee, and a partner, director, officer, manager, and representative; (2) Government agency: means a subdivision of the executive, legislative, judicial, or other branch of government, including a department, independent establishment, commission, administration, authority, board, and bureau, and a corporation or other legal entity established, and subject to control, by a government or governments for the execution of a governmental or intergovernmental program; (3) Local: means of or pertaining to a political subdivision within a State; (4) State: includes a State of the United States, the District of Columbia, and any commonwealth, territory, or possession of the United States; and (5) In any one-year period: means a continuous period that commences no earlier than twelve months before the commission of the offense or that ends no later than twelve months after the commission of the offense. Such period may include time both before and after the commission of the offense. Pass it around. SHARE!

HILARIOUS: Liberal White Woman Demands We Import Somalians, But Refuses To House One Herself!
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

HILARIOUS: Liberal White Woman Demands We Import Somalians, But Refuses To House One Herself!

This is so good! Behold….the classic Liberal White Woman, everybody! Big time virtue signaling. Ready to import the Third World because we have to!  She’s just so moral! But then the kill shot… Ok great, how many Somalians can we ship directly to your house? ERROR! ERROR! DOES NOT COMPUTE! I CAN’T DO THAT! So funny, watch here: LMFAO! Liberal woman demands Trump open the borders to Somalia, PANICS when asked to house a Somali refugee herself LIB: “We should be taking people in war-torn countries in!” “Would you be able to take in a Somali migrant?” LIB: “Mmm, I don’t know. Not sure if I could or… pic.twitter.com/PTBpzUm9bR — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 2, 2026 LMFAO! Liberal woman demands Trump open the borders to Somalia, PANICS when asked to house a Somali refugee herself LIB: “We should be taking people in war-torn countries in!” “Would you be able to take in a Somali migrant?” LIB: “Mmm, I don’t know. Not sure if I could or not. I don’t live in New York. Massachusetts.” “That’s OK, we can send them to Massachusetts! Can we get your name, email, and how many you can take in?” LIB: “I, I, I couldn’t do that without talking to my husband first. I’d want to have more information first.” “OK! Can we just get your information?” LIB: “No, I don’t know who you are.” She LITERALLY did the meme Backup video here if needed: