by Aaron Gentzler Something strange is happening… And it’s threatening to disrupt everything, from the price of your electric bill… to the phone in your pocket… to the retirement account you’ve spent a lifetime building. In 1973, an oil “shock” of epic proportions brought America to its knees… The price of gas leapt by 47%. Inflation hit 12%. And the lights in New York’s famed Times Square went dark. In 2008 a financial “shock” again hit our shores. With stocks cratering 50% or more. Now, a third “shock” is upon us. And as you’ll see, it could reshape the economy… and the investment landscape… more dramatically than anything we’ve seen since the 1970s. The man raising the alarm is a 50-year insider in Washington DC… And he recently agreed to sit down with us for a critical intelligence briefing… To watch the whole interview, free of charge, click here. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!) This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post 50-Year Government Insider: “This Is the 1970s All Over Again” appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr set the internet ablaze earlier this year when a video surfaced of him using methylene blue while on a flight. Methylene blue is just now getting widespread attention, however, according to The New York Post: In recent years, celebrities, wellness influencers and biohackers have touted methylene blue for several off-label uses, claiming it can boost energy levels and metabolism, enhance cognitive function and combat aging — though evidence remains limited. Early research suggests that methylene blue may have antioxidant properties that help reduce toxic proteins in the brain, potentially aiding in the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Some studies also indicate that the drug may help delay skin aging by stimulating the production of collagen and elastin, reducing cellular damage and promoting wound healing.  WHAT IS METHYLENE BLUE? First used in the 1800s as a textile dye, visionary physician Paul Ehrlich discovered methylene blue’s antimicrobial properties against malaria—making this the first synthetic drug in modern medicine. Today, this century-old compound is FDA-approved for methemoglobinemia (a condition in which the blood can’t carry oxygen properly) but has garnered renewed interest for its off-label applications, particularly in enhancing mitochondrial function, combating neurodegenerative diseases, and as adjunct treatment of long COVID. How methylene blue works and its “off-label” uses: Energy Backup:Methylene blue acts like a “backup generator” for your cells’ energy factories (mitochondria). When part of the energy production line (specifically “Complex I”) breaks down—due to toxins, disease, or aging—methylene blue moves electrons directly to later stages of the energy-making process, allowing cells to keep producing energy (ATP) even when parts of the system are damaged. Oxidative Stress Reduction:It acts like a molecular sponge, soaking up harmful molecules called reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage cells. By neutralizing these destructive molecules, it reduces oxidative stress—a key contributor to aging and diseases like Alzheimer’s. It also blocks caspase-6, an enzyme that drives brain inflammation and kills neurons in Alzheimer’s patients. Think of it as a two-in-one protector: it calms oxidative damage while stopping the enzyme that fuels brain cell death. Promising Off-Label Applications: Neurodegenerative diseases:Low doses enhance cerebral metabolism, improving outcomes in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s models. It also reduces swelling in traumatic brain injury victims. Chronic fatigue and Long COVID:Due to its ability to reduce oxidative stress and promote mitochondrial function, methylene blue shows promise in relieving long COVID symptoms. Septic shock and vasoplegic syndrome:By inhibiting nitric oxide synthase, it restores vascular tone. Malaria adjunct therapy:It disrupts Plasmodium metabolism, reducing parasitemia. HOW YOU CAN GET METHYLENE BLUE The medical experts at The Wellness Company – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Kelly Victory – were leaders in the efforts to provide the public with accurate medical information during COVID. These experts have repeatedly shown that they prioritized the health and welfare of their patients over the bottom line of the big pharmaceutical companies. Now the experts at The Wellness Company are making methylene blue available to you at home with RECHARGE! RECHARGE your cells with the first-ever combination of Methylene Blue and Urolithin A. Experience enhanced cognitive function and ultimate mitochondrial health. From sharper thinking to stronger cells, Methylene Blue enhances how your brain and body perform by enhancing mental clarity and focus, supporting blood flow, and increasing ATP production. Urolithin A promotes healthy aging by activating mitophagy. Mitophagy helps the body to recycle and rebuild mitochondria (the powerhouses of your cells) and enhances the benefits of Methylene Blue. RECHARGE has been scientifically formulated with research-backed ingredients to enhance mental clarity and focus and support ultimate mitochondrial health. Methylene Blue and Urolithin A are a powerful combo with potent antioxidants for healthy, youthful cells. Be like Bobby (Kennedy)! Add Methylene blue (and Urolithin A) to your healthcare regimen today! Click here to order RECHARGE now! (Note: The information provided is intended for generalized informational purposes only and should not be considered personal medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications. Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the links provided, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to keep you SAFE and HEALTY!) The information provided on this website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications.   What do you think? This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Is Methylene Blue RFK Jr’s Secret to Staying Healthy at Any Age? appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

A cargo vessel has been struck near the Strait of Hormuz, and the world’s busiest oil chokepoint is on edge again. The hit came right where Iran has been warning ships to turn back. Here is what we know, and what is still unconfirmed. UK Maritime Trade Operations issued Warning 074-26 on June 25, 2026, reporting an incident 7.5 nautical miles southeast of Dahit, Oman. A cargo vessel was hit on the starboard side by what UKMTO called an unknown projectile. The strike damaged the vessel’s bridge. The master reported no casualties and no environmental impact. Authorities are investigating. The UKMTO Warning 074-26 is the cleanest official source on the incident and keeps the facts narrow. The report date is June 25, with a 1410 UTC report time, and the source is listed as the vessel’s master. UKMTO places the incident 7.5 nautical miles southeast of Dahit, Oman, on the Omani side of the Hormuz/Gulf of Oman transit area. The warning says a cargo vessel was hit on the starboard side by an unknown projectile, causing damage to the bridge. The master reported no casualties and no environmental impact, which is the first piece of good news in an otherwise dangerous report. UKMTO also said authorities are investigating and advised vessels to transit with caution while reporting suspicious activity. UKMTO did not name the vessel and did not assign blame. UKMTO WARNING 074-26 – ATTACK Click here to view the full warning. https://t.co/0hDEAb7xO9#MaritimeSecurity #MarSec pic.twitter.com/HlPzQDLBja — UKMTO Operations Centre (@UK_MTO) June 25, 2026 The fallout hit fast on the humanitarian side. The International Maritime Organization announced it was pausing its evacuation plan after being told of an attack in the Gulf of Oman on a vessel that had passed through the Strait of Hormuz. The IMO statement said the struck vessel did not transit under the IMO’s evacuation framework, which matters because the agency had just begun trying to move stranded ships and crews out safely. Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez said several vessels had already been successfully evacuated under the plan before the pause. He said the pause is meant to reconfirm that safety guarantees remain in place for ships on the evacuation list and for all vessels in the region. The timing is brutal because the IMO statement also notes the evacuation issue on the Day of the Seafarer. Thousands of sailors remain stuck in the wider Gulf crisis, and one strike was enough to force the U.N. maritime agency to stop and reassess. In plain terms, this is no longer only a shipping-lane story. It is a seafarer-safety story, an energy-security story, and a test of whether anyone can guarantee safe passage through Hormuz right now. IMO pauses evacuation plan."I have been informed of an attack today in the Gulf of Oman. Seafarer safety remains paramount. To ensure coordinated approach & navigational safety, the IMO evacuation plan will be paused until further clarity."– @IMOSecGenhttps://t.co/UtvKjTtG5N pic.twitter.com/29m2lMkt1V — International Maritime Organization (@IMOHQ) June 25, 2026 Now to the question everyone wants answered: who fired? Officially, the projectile remains unidentified. That is important, because early Hormuz reporting is moving fast. The Associated Press reported it was unclear who launched the projectile or what type of vessel was targeted. AP also reported the strike came after Iran threatened vessels using a new route through the strait without Tehran’s permission. That route runs near Oman, was promoted by the U.N. maritime agency, and had been used as a way to get ships moving again. Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority said transit outside its designated routes would not be covered by its safe-passage guarantee. AP reported that traffic through the strait had risen recently but remained below prewar levels. That context is what makes the projectile report so serious. A single strike can undo days of confidence-building, scare off commercial traffic, and hand Tehran leverage over ships that are supposed to have freedom of navigation. The New York Post went further, reporting that a Singapore cargo ship was struck by Iran’s IRGC after Iranian orders for vessels to turn back from the new lane near Oman. The Post described bridge damage with no casualties and identified the fight over the Omani route as a central flashpoint in the shipping dispute. It also reported that traffic remains far below normal despite the recent effort to reopen movement through the strait. So keep the distinction clean: UKMTO says unknown projectile. Other reporting points at Iran and the IRGC, and some outlets identify the vessel as the Singapore-flagged Ever Lovely, though UKMTO itself did not name a vessel. A cargo vessel was struck by an unknown projectile off the coast of Oman on Thursday, causing damage to its bridge but leaving no reported casualties or environmental impact, the UK Maritime Trade Operations said. The British maritime security agency said the incident occurred… pic.twitter.com/fgXcafCDlK — Iran International English (@IranIntl_En) June 25, 2026 The timing is the story behind the story. This strike lands directly inside President Trump’s 60-day Iran/Hormuz framework, the deal meant to keep ships moving through the strait safely while talks continue. Secretary of State Marco Rubio recently made the American line clear: no tolls, no fees, no payments for safe passage. That is the leverage Iran is testing. A projectile into a cargo bridge, on a route Iran told ships to avoid, is a message aimed at the deal itself. For now, the official status remains an unknown projectile pending investigation. But the bigger picture is already clear: Hormuz is not calm, the evacuation plan is paused, and the world is watching to see whether Tehran backs down or pushes this fight even further. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post BREAKING: Cargo Ship Hit By “Unknown Projective” In The Strait of Hormuz, Story Developing. appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

A judge in Virginia has temporarily prohibited state police from enforcing a ban on so-called ‘assault weapons’ scheduled to take effect on July 1. Lancaster County Circuit Judge John Martin issued the preliminary injunction, siding with Gun Owners of America, the Virginia Citizens Defense League, and resident John Crump. “The preliminary injunction prevents Virginia State Police from enforcing the law through at least Dec. 31, or until the court issues a final ruling,” the National Association for Gun Rights stated. BIG NEWS IN VIRGINIA! A Virginia judge has blocked enforcement of the state's so-called "assault weapons" ban before it could take effect on July 1. The preliminary injunction prevents Virginia State Police from enforcing the law through at least Dec. 31, or until the court… pic.twitter.com/9RtC9L8Xs9 — National Association for Gun Rights (@gunrights) June 25, 2026 WTKR has more: SB749 bans the sale and transfer of what Virginia defines as assault weapons and magazines that carry over 15 rounds, with some exceptions. Violations are a Class 1 misdemeanor. This new assault weapons ban was set to take effect on July 1. Those who already own these weapons will not be impacted. Attorney General Jay Jones called the ruling “disappointing” in a statement sent to News 3. “This ruling is disappointing and puts our communities at risk. The Commonwealth will urgently file a motion to stay this ruling and appeal this temporary injunction. We will continue to vigorously defend Virginia’s assault weapons ban and magazine capacity restrictions and uphold the laws designed to keep Virginians safe,” Jones said. The plaintiffs argued the ban “conflicts with a provision of the Virginia Constitution enshrining the right to keep and bear arms,” Courthouse News Service noted. “Article I, Section 13 is the commonwealth’s recognition of a pre-existing right with which Virginians were endowed by their creator, and it operates as a fixed limitation on the power of government to enact legislation affecting firearms,” the plaintiffs wrote in their motion, according to the outlet. “Our injunction prevents the Virginia State Police from enforcing the firearm, magazine, and carry bans while our case moves through the courts. As it currently stands, the temporary injunction delays enforcement from July 1, 2026, until December 31, 2026,” Gun Owners of America wrote. Our injunction prevents the Virginia State Police from enforcing the firearm, magazine, and carry bans while our case moves through the courts. As it currently stands, the temporary injunction delays enforcement from July 1, 2026, until December 31, 2026. https://t.co/NbYCf0zQg9 pic.twitter.com/z2NI7Qjwrd — Gun Owners of America (@GunOwners) June 25, 2026 Courthouse News Service shared further: Martin denied the commonwealth’s attempt to separate the state court’s analysis from the analysis the Supreme Court requires of federal courts following its 2022 decision in N.Y. State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. Bruen. Martin held that the federal analysis — which requires the government to demonstrate that the challenged gun regulation is rooted in the historical tradition of firearm regulations rather than engaging in interest-balancing or policy-laden analyses — is instructive. The plaintiffs rebutted the commonwealth’s assertion that the weapons at issue aren’t in common use and are thus not the bearable arms protected by the Second Amendment. “They are not just common, they are ubiquitous,” attorney David Browne of Spiro & Browne, representing the plaintiffs, told the judge. “The challenged statutes in this case concern some of the most commonly used arms and magazines in the nation.” The commonwealth argued that the guns included in the ban are akin to military weapons that are especially dangerous. Martin asked why the ban doesn’t apply to all military weapons, including M1 Carbines and handguns, which remain legal. The commonwealth argued the plaintiffs’ theory would essentially give Virginians the right to bear any arms, including grenade launchers. “There is no absolute right to bear arms,” Deputy Solicitor General Trent Taylor said. The post Enforcement Of Blue State ‘Assault Weapons’ Ban Halted By Judge appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) said he strongly disagreed with the decision to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians after the Supreme Court ruled that Syrian and Haitian nationals seeking temporary legal protections could not receive judicial relief. SEND THEM ALL HOME: In Landmark 6-3 Ruling, Supreme Court Hands President Trump A Huge Immigration Win! "While I have never disputed the ability of the President to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS), I strongly disagree with ending Haitian TPS at this time. First, the situation on the ground in Haiti is a humanitarian and political disaster and continues to warrant an extension. The State Department has a level 4 travel advisory telling all Americans to evacuate and not travel there precisely because the gangs are in charge of the country, engaged in gun and drug trafficking, and kidnapping innocent Haitians. We want to root it out and allow for a stable government to be establish with a free a fair election, creating the conditions for a safe return for Haitians," Lawler said. "Second, of the 350,000+ lawful Haitian TPS holders, roughly 1/3rd work in our healthcare system. Immediately shutting off TPS will create a crisis in our hospitals, nursing homes, and in the I/DD community. I’m asking the administration to allow for an orderly process by which Haitian TPS holders can maintain their work authorization while their immigration cases are adjudicated over the next six months, if the revocation of TPS moves forward," he continued. "Furthermore, I believe the Senate should take up my legislation with Congresswoman Gillen to temporarily extend Haitian TPS to address these issues," he added. While I have never disputed the ability of the President to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS), I strongly disagree with ending Haitian TPS at this time. First, the situation on the ground in Haiti is a humanitarian and political disaster and continues to warrant an extension.… https://t.co/MRKsa19prQ — Mike Lawler (@lawler4ny) June 25, 2026 The Hill has more: The House passed the bill 224-204 with the support of 10 Republicans in April. In a statement, Gillen called the court’s ruling a “cruel and harmful decision … [that] now puts millions of our friends and neighbors’ lives at risk.” “I have stood shoulder to shoulder with our Haitian community on Long Island throughout this fight, pushed back against the administration, and fought this termination in the courts,” she said. “I will not relent in securing their safety.” Lawler’s district is home to one of the largest Haitian communities in the U.S. In April, he said the district’s Haitian community plays “a critical role in our local economy and the vibrant culture of the Hudson Valley.” However, Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.), the chair of the Senate Appropriations Homeland Security Subcommittee, said in April that the bill to extend protections for Haitians was “dead on arrival” and echoed the Department of Homeland Security’s argument that TPS should be temporary and not “last for years.” "I have consistently advocated for extending Temporary Protected Status for Haitian nationals. I co-led H.R. 1689 with Rep. Laura Gillen, urged the Administration on multiple occasions to extend TPS protections, led a bipartisan effort with local officials in support of Haitian TPS recipients," Lawler said. "Just this year, I voted in favor of our bill after signing the discharge petition that brought this legislation to the House floor," he added. I have consistently advocated for extending Temporary Protected Status for Haitian nationals. I co-led H.R. 1689 with Rep. Laura Gillen, urged the Administration on multiple occasions to extend TPS protections, led a bipartisan effort with local officials in support of Haitian… pic.twitter.com/LVEeVJAJtC — Congressman Mike Lawler (@RepMikeLawler) June 25, 2026 Fox News shared further: Trump first attempted to revoke TPS for Haitians, which was initially granted after the devastating 2010 earthquake in Haiti, during his first term in 2017. A series of federal challenges to that attempt kept Haitian TPS in place throughout Trump's first term, but in 2025, then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem ended the status entirely. On Thursday, the Supreme Court bolstered that order, ruling 6-3 that federal courts do not have the jurisdiction to second-guess executive branch decisions regarding TPS terminations. The White House and representatives for DHS reacted positively to the rulings. "This ruling is a tremendous win for the Trump Administration. Today, the Supreme Court affirmed what President Trump has always maintained: temporary protected status is, by definition, temporary. It was never intended to be a pathway to permanent status or legal residency and it is committed to the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security," White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson told Fox News Digital in an exclusive statement. "The Trump Administration continues to lawfully end the egregious abuses to our immigration system that have hurt Americans for years," Jackson concluded. James Percival, general counsel for the DHS, also praised the ruling in a Thursday post on X. "The Court vindicates DHS yet again," Percival wrote. "The T in TPS stands for TEMPORARY, yet many of these designations became de facto amnesty. This is a win for the rule of law and common sense," Percival concluded. The post House Republican “Strongly” Opposes Ending Temporary Protected Status For Haitian Nationals After Supreme Court Ruling appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.