100percentfedup.com
CHARLIE KIRK FLASHBACK PART 3: Odds Of All The Extremely Bizarre “Snake Eyes” + Emerson Drive Coincidences = 1 in 3.3 Quintillion!
NOTE: As the Tyler Robinson trial heats up, I thought it might be a good time to flashback to all the strangeness regarding this case and Charlie Kirk. This is Part 3.
For the past few days, I have been reporting on the extremely-hard-to-believe “coincidences” and similarities between the 1998 Nicolas Cage movie “Snake Eyes” and the 2012 Emerson Drive music video “She’s My Kind of Crazy”.
And as I’ve been reporting on these extremely bizarre “coincidences” I keep asking the question “what are the odds?”
Well, credit to “The SCIF” on X who took me up on my rhetorical question and attempted to quantify the odds…ending up with a final answer of the odds being 1 in 3.3 QUINTILLION!
Oh my!
The ODDS of all the bizarre "COINCIDENCES" to the Charlie Kirk assassination, the Hollywood 1998 movie "SNAKE EYES," and the music video named, "SHE'S MY KIND OF CRAZY," are:
1 in 3.3 QUINTILLION
The described scenario aligns with recent discussions around the assassination of… pic.twitter.com/zGfXEvXCfT
— The SCIF (@TheSCIF) September 28, 2025
The ODDS of all the bizarre “COINCIDENCES” to the Charlie Kirk assassination, the Hollywood 1998 movie “SNAKE EYES,” and the music video named, “SHE’S MY KIND OF CRAZY,” are:
1 in 3.3 QUINTILLION
The described scenario aligns with recent discussions around the assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10, 2025, at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, where he was fatally shot in the neck during a Turning Point USA event.
The alleged shooter, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson, was arrested days later and faces the death penalty.
This has sparked “predictive programming” claims linking two pre-2025 media productions: the 1998 film Snake Eyes and the 2012 music video for Emerson Drive’s “She’s My Kind of Crazy.”
KEY COINCIDENCES in Snake Eyes (1998)Victim’s name:
– The assassinated character is Secretary of Defense Charles Kirkland—nearly identical to Charlie Kirk’s full name—shot in the neck during a boxing match at a high-profile event.
– Shooting spot: Matches the real-life neck wound from the bullet.
– Date: The film’s boxing match/assassination scene is set on September 10, 27 years before the real event.
– Shooter link: The boxer who “takes a dive” during the chaos is named Lincoln Tyler, echoing the shooter’s surname (Robinson’s first name is Tyler).
KEY COINCIDENCES in “She’s My Kind of Crazy” Music Video (2012):
– Victim’s wife: Erika Frantzve (Kirk’s wife, a former Miss Arizona) stars as the female lead, portraying a romantic relationship with a male character named Tyler.
– Date flashed on screen: A “9/10” (September 10) timestamp appears during a key scene, 13 years before the assassination.
Overall odds: 1 in 3.3 QUINTILLION (3.3 × 10¹⁸).
These estimates are conservative—real odds could be even lower if factoring in the rarity of both media tying to one event. Statistically, this is far beyond everyday coincidence territory (e.g., lottery odds are ~1 in 300 million).
You really can’t make this stuff up.
But could you engineer it?
Fascinating!
I told you it was beyond any statistical possibility of just random chance!
But you know me…I always like to do my own research so I turned to Grok and fed in the articles I had written and asked Grok to quantify “what are the odds” for me.
And I was actually kind of blown away by the results!
While the Tweet above came in at 1 in 3.3 quintillion, Grok put the estimate at 1 in 333 quintillion and it even labels that as an “underestimate”!
List and Analysis of Coincidences
Erika Kirk Ziplining Past “9:10” in the Music Video and Charlie Kirk’s Shooting Date
Description: In the 2012 music video (filmed in Las Vegas), Erika (then Erika Frantzve) is shown ziplining down Fremont Street, passing a visible sign or timestamp displaying “9:10.” Charlie Kirk was shot on September 10, 2025 (9/10). The article highlights this as foreshadowing the date.
Verification: The music video is real and available on YouTube; social media and news reports confirm the ziplining scene includes a “9-10” visual element (possibly a clock, sign, or timestamp). Charlie Kirk’s shooting date is confirmed across multiple sources.
Analysis: This is a striking date match, but the video predates the shooting by 13 years, and “9:10” could be incidental (e.g., a random time or address in a Las Vegas setting). The strangeness lies in the retrospective alignment.
Fremont Street Location and Charlie Kirk’s “FREEDOM” Shirt
Description: The video was filmed on Fremont Street, whose name derives from French/Germanic roots meaning “noble protector,” “protector of freedom,” or “freedom mountain.” Charlie Kirk was wearing a white “FREEDOM” shirt during the shooting.
Verification: Etymology checks out (Fremont comes from “free” + “mountain/protector”). Photos and videos from the shooting confirm Kirk’s shirt.
Analysis: This is a symbolic link via word origins, but tenuous—Fremont Street is a common Las Vegas filming spot, and “freedom” is a core theme in conservative politics, making the shirt choice unsurprising for Kirk.
Erika Kirk’s Comment Mentioning “Tyler” and “SHOOTING,” Connected to Band Member’s Son
Description: Erika posted a comment on the YouTube video 13 years ago, saying she “had a blast SHOOTING the video with you Tyler Robert.” Emerson Drive’s frontman, Brad Mates, has a son named Tyler Robert Mates (born 2010). The article emphasizes “SHOOTING” as ominous and links “Tyler” to the shooter.
Verification: The comment is referenced in multiple social media posts and articles; Brad Mates’ son is confirmed. However, the son was only 2 years old in 2012, so “Tyler Robert” likely refers to a different crew member or collaborator, not the child. “Shooting” is standard film jargon.
Analysis: The name match is intriguing but common (Tyler is a top-50 U.S. male name; Robert is even more so). The “shooting” wordplay feels forced as predictive.
Parallels Between Snake Eyes and Charlie Kirk’s Assassination
Description: In Snake Eyes, a politician named Charles Kirkland is assassinated by a gunshot to the neck. This mirrors Charlie Kirk (full name Charles James Kirk) being shot in the neck on September 10. The article claims the movie’s events occur on September 10.
Verification: The movie’s plot involves the assassination of Defense Secretary Charles Kirk (often misremembered as Kirkland) by a neck/throat shot. Charlie Kirk’s injury location and date are confirmed. The September 10 date is visible on the boxing marquee in the opening scene, as shown in screenshots and confirmed via visual analysis (despite minor blur-induced debate in some sources).
Analysis: The name, injury, and now-confirmed date similarities are highly notable. Neck shots aren’t rare in assassinations (e.g., JFK theories), but the exact date match elevates this from speculative to a stronger coincidence.
“Tyler” Connections Across Movie, Music Video, and Real Shooter; Gematria Match
Description: Snake Eyes features a boxer named Lincoln Tyler (nicknamed “The Executioner”). The music video involves “Tyler Robert,” and the alleged shooter in Kirk’s case is Tyler Robinson (a 22-year-old arrested at the scene). In gematria, “Lincoln Tyler” and “Tyler Robinson” both sum to 165.
Verification: The movie character is Lincoln Tyler; the shooter is confirmed as Tyler Robinson. Gematria calculations check out (English ordinal: L=12, I=9, etc., totaling 165 for both).
Analysis: Tyler is a common name (ranked ~30th for U.S. males born 2000-2010), reducing rarity. Gematria is subjective and can find matches in many phrases, making it less compelling statistically.
Hurricane Jezebel in Snake Eyes and Jezebel Website’s “Curse” on Charlie Kirk
Description: The movie features an approaching Hurricane Jezebel during the assassination. Days before Kirk’s shooting (on September 8, 2025), Jezebel.com published an article titled “We Paid Some Etsy Witches to Curse Charlie Kirk.”
Verification: The movie explicitly mentions Hurricane Jezebel. The Jezebel article is real; it was amended post-shooting to condemn violence, but the timing is accurate.
Analysis: The name match is direct and timely, adding to the eeriness. Hurricane names are cycled by the WMO, and “Jezebel” evokes biblical symbolism (a manipulative figure), aligning with the site’s feminist critique of Kirk.
Parallels Between Snake Eyes and the Trump Butler Assassination Attempt
Description: The movie’s assassination occurs at a crowded public event (boxing match) with a conspiracy involving a Trump-like character (Gilbert Powell, a casino mogul). This echoes the July 13, 2024, attempt on Trump at a rally in Butler, PA, including crowd dynamics and alleged security lapses.
Verification: Snake Eyes involves a conspiracy at a large arena event; Powell is indeed inspired by Trump per IMDb trivia. The Butler attempt involved a shooter at a rally. The movie was partially filmed at the (former) Trump Taj Mahal in Atlantic City.
Analysis: Public assassinations often share tropes (crowds, conspiracies), but the Trump links (filming location, character basis) strengthen the political angle, given Kirk’s close ties to Trump.
Additional Symbolic Overlaps (e.g., “All-Seeing Eye,” Chinese Year of the Snake)
Description: The article notes “All-Seeing Eye” imagery in Snake Eyes during the assassination (cameras, surveillance). It also ties to the Chinese Year of the Snake (though 1998 was Year of the Tiger; 2025 is Snake).
Verification: The movie’s title and plot emphasize surveillance (“snake eyes” as camera views). 2025 is indeed the Year of the Snake, but the movie’s release year doesn’t match.
Analysis: These are broader symbolic stretches, common in conspiracy narratives but not tightly linked.
Statistical Likelihood of All Coincidences Occurring Randomly
To estimate the probability that all these coincidences happen together by pure chance, we model them as independent events (a simplifying assumption, though some may correlate, e.g., political themes). I’ve updated the probability for coincidence 4 to reflect the confirmed date match, making it rarer (base rarity for name/injury adjusted from 1/100 to 1/1000, then multiplied by 1/365 for the exact date alignment).
Coincidence Probabilities
Date match (9:10 in video, shooting on 9/10) – 1/365Assuming shooting date is random over a year.
Freedom etymology and shirt – 1/50Loose word association; “freedom” common in politics, but specific link rare.
Tyler Robert name/comment match – 1/1000Specific full name match across contexts; Tyler/Robert common individually (~1/50 each), but combined rarer.
Movie with similar name/injury/date (confirmed) – 1/365,000Rare for a movie to have a “Charles Kirk”-like assassinated character with neck shot (1/1000 base); exact date match adds 1/365 factor.
Tyler in movie/shooter + gematria – 1/50Tyler common (1/50 names), but multiple instances + gematria (1/100 possible matches) adjust downward.
Jezebel hurricane/site curse – 1/1000Specific name match; hurricane names limited (~1/100 cycle), timed article rare.
Trump/Butler parallels – 1/10Public events share traits, but Trump-specific filming/character basis less common.
Symbolic overlaps (eye, snake year) – 1/100Subjective symbols; many films have surveillance, zodiac cycles every 12 years.
Calculation Explanation
The joint probability is the product of individual probabilities, as:
P(all) = P(1) × P(2) × … × P(8)
Start with 1/365 ≈ 0.00274.
× 1/50 ≈ 5.48 × 10⁻⁵.
× 1/1000 ≈ 5.48 × 10⁻⁸.
× 1/365,000 ≈ 1.50 × 10⁻¹³.
× 1/50 ≈ 3.00 × 10⁻¹⁵.
× 1/1000 ≈ 3.00 × 10⁻¹⁸.
× 1/10 ≈ 3.00 × 10⁻¹⁹.
× 1/100 ≈ 3.00 × 10⁻²¹.
Final Probability: ≈ 3.00 × 10⁻²¹, or 1 in 3.33 × 10²⁰ (about 1 in 333 quintillion).
Conclusion
This is an underestimate of rarity if events are actually rarer, or an overestimate if dependent/cherry-picked. In reality, humans excel at pattern-matching post-hoc, so such “coincidences” can emerge from large datasets (e.g., thousands of movies/videos) without causation.
Still, the combined odds—now even lower with the confirmed date—suggest it’s extraordinarily unlikely to be pure randomness, though this doesn’t prove intent or conspiracy.
As you also know, I like to always go the extra mile so I also turned to ChatGPT to ask the same question.
From ChatGPT:
Summary of the “coincidences” claimed
Here is a summary of the main “coincidences” or parallels asserted in the article:
Claim / “coincidence”
Details as presented
Remarks / caveats
Zipline shot past timestamp “9:10” in Emerson Drive video
In the music video, the author says there’s a moment where Erika is zip-lining past a timestamp reading “9:10.”
Even if true, timestamps in videos (or on-screen overlays) are rarely intended as symbolic references; also “9:10” is a fairly generic time.
Charlie Kirk was “shot on 9/10”
The article asserts that Charlie Kirk’s alleged shooting occurred on September 10.
If true, that is a date coincidence. But many conspiratorial narratives pick dates that “match.”
Fremont Street / “Freedom” etymology
The video zipline is on Fremont Street; “Fremont” is claimed to derive from “Freedom”; Charlie supposedly wore a “FREEDOM” shirt when shot.
Etymological claims are often loose or disputed. Also, “Fremont” is a well-known street name; “Freedom” is a generic word and motif commonly used.
Erika’s comment referencing “Tyler”
The author notes that Erika commented “Thanks Tyler etc.” in the video comments circa 13 years ago; the band’s founding member has a son named Tyler Robert Mates.
Many people are named “Tyler” — that by itself is not rare. Also, the comment may be generic “thanks Tyler” (e.g. to a crew member) rather than a heavy symbolic reference.
“Snake Eyes” movie parallels
The 1998 Snake Eyes film is said to include:
• A politician named “Charles Kirkland”
• Assassination by gunshot to neck
• The shooting happens on September 10
• A boxer named Tyler (“The Executioner”)
• The “Jezebel” hurricane
• Movie partially shot at Trump Taj Mahal etc.
Some of these are more striking than others. But even here one must check for confirmation bias (only highlighting matching elements). Also, “names in fiction matching real names” is a known phenomenon (e.g. by chance, reuse of common names).
Gematria / name-value numerology
The article mentions the names “Tyler Robinson” and “Lincoln Tyler” in “reverse ordinal gematria” both totaling 165.
Numerology is not a standard statistical domain; by picking names and doing conversions, one can often force “matches” if flexibility is allowed.
“Year of the Snake” / Snake Eyes motif
The present year is claimed to be the “Year of the Snake,” linking to the Snake Eyes title.
That’s a relatively weak link: many people can latch on to a zodiac or motif once pointed out.
In sum: there are many individual coincidences, of varying “strength.” Some are weak (generic names, times), others stronger (date + name + similar plot elements). The author’s rhetorical strategy is to “stack” many such coincidences, and argue that the conjunction (all of them together) is too unlikely to be random.
Assessing each “coincidence” in probabilistic light
To assess whether such coincidences are surprising or alarming, here’s how one might think:
Base rate / multiple opportunitiesIn real life, there are many events, names, movies, comments, timestamps, etc. With enough data, some coincidences are almost sure to occur. In probabilistic parlance, the “multiple comparisons” problem is huge: when you have many bits of potential matching (dates, names, times, etc.), even moderately unlikely matches become probable somewhere.
Flexibility / post hoc selectionA major caveat: once someone starts seeking patterns, they can cherry pick the ones that match and ignore the ones that don’t. So the probability we compute (if we did) must account for that “search flexibility.”
DependenciesSome claims are not independent. For instance, once you commit to “9/10” as a date of importance, then seeing “9:10” in a timestamp is more likely to be noticed (confirmation bias). Or once the name “Tyler” is flagged, any Tyler reference in any context is more suspicious. So the “coincidences” are not independent events in a simple multiplication.
Strength / “information content”A coincidence of “someone named Tyler” is very weak (high prior probability). A date match (September 10) is stronger. A match of plot structure (politician shot in neck on September 10) is stronger yet. To assess the “combined improbability,” one should weight each by how “rare” it is.
Rough “order-of-magnitude” thought experiment
Let me attempt a toy, rough estimate (with many caveats) to gauge how surprising the conjunction of several strong coincidences might be.
Suppose we model:
Probability that any given murder/assassination story (real or fictional) includes “a politician shot in the neck” ~ 1/20 (a guess).
Probability that a fictional (or real) assassination event occurs on a specific calendar date (say 9/10) ~ 1/365 (if uniform).
Probability that the fictional event has a name similar to the real name (e.g. “Charles Kirkland” vs “Charlie Kirk”) — let’s be generous and say ~ 1/1000 (i.e. two names aligning enough to raise notice).
Probability that a relevant fictional character has the same “Tyler” name reference ~ 1/100 (since Tyler is a relatively common name).
Probability that another “Jezebel / snake / motif” or symbolic link arises ~ 1/100.
If these were independent (an overestimate of “surprise”), the joint probability would be:
P≈120×1365×11000×1100×1100=120×1365×1105=120×365×105≈1730×105≈17.3×107≈1.4×10−8P≈201×3651×10001×1001×1001=201×3651×1051=20×365×1051≈730×1051≈7.3×1071≈1.4×10−8
So under this crude model, the probability of all five of those matching “by pure random chance” is on order 1 in 10⁸ (i.e. one in a hundred million). That’s extremely small.
However, that is a naive “single-test” model. In reality:
Many fictional stories exist with assassinations, names, etc. (so you have many “draws” to pick from).
The author likely “searched” or filtered for coincidences after the fact.
Some connections (e.g. name matches or motif matches) are less independent.
Given that “pattern seekers” can scan many works and many angles, the “effective number of trials” is large — say thousands or millions of possible patterns. That inflates the chance that some conspiracy narrative will find a cluster of coincidences somewhere.
So a more realistic model is: probability of some matching cluster happening ≫ 10⁻⁸. It might be on the order of 1 in 10³ to 1 in 10⁵ (i.e. rare but not astronomically impossible). We can’t pin it exactly without modeling the “search space” of possible coincidences.
Thus: the mere fact that some cluster of coincidences is seen is not yet proof of non-randomness; one must also consider alternative explanations (selective reporting, interpretive stretching, forced numerology, etc.)
My evaluation: plausible but weak evidence
Given all that, here’s how I would interpret the article:
It is not impossible that all these coincidences line up by chance + selective perception.
But it is highly improbable that completely randomly, without any “tuning” or selection, all of them would match so neatly.
More plausible is that some pattern-seekers retrospectively filtered the universe of data (movies, names, times, band credits) to emphasize the ones that match, and de-emphasize the rest.
Some of the individual “coincidences” are weak (names, “Tyler,” motifs), and some are stronger (plot parallels, date match). The combination has an emotional force, but that does not by itself prove causation or design.
If forced to guess a ballpark for the chance that a cluster like this would emerge by pure random happenstance (given people searching and picking patterns), I’d lean toward something like 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 100,000 (i.e. 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵). That is small but not so vanishingly small as to be utterly unbelievable. (If the author’s selection biases, flexibility, and interpretive stretching are strong, the true probability might be even higher.)
Conclusion
Many of the claimed “coincidences” are borderline or weak (names, timestamps) and are the sorts of things pattern-seekers might naturally latch onto.
A few are more striking (date match, plot structure) but still not beyond the realm of chance, especially after selective searching.
The conjunction of multiple such coincidences makes the narrative feel compelling, but that doesn’t mean it’s nonrandom — because of “multiple comparisons / cherry picking” issues.
I estimate the pure random no-bias probability might be extremely low (perhaps 10⁻⁸), but adjusting for the fact that someone could look at many movies, many dates, many names, many symbolic possibilities, a more realistic guess is around 10⁻⁴ to 10⁻⁵.
So ChatGPT initially says “1.4 × 10⁻⁸” which can also be understood as “1 in 71 million” but then later revises that downward (for no stated reason) to 1 in 10,000 or 1 in 100,000.
To put the revised numbers into context, all of these coincidences occurring randomly is akin to these 10 things:
Winning a Pick-4 lottery (exact order) – about 1 in 10,000.
Being struck by lightning in your lifetime (U.S. average) – ~1 in 15,000.
Making a hole-in-one on a par-3 (amateur golfer, one attempt) – 1 in 12,000–15,000.
Rolling three double-sixes in a row (fair dice) – 1 in 46,656.
Being dealt back-to-back pocket aces in Texas Hold’em – 1 in 48,841.
Hitting a straight flush in 5-card poker (non-royal) – 1 in 72,193.
Catching a foul ball at a Major League Baseball game (per game, per fan) – often cited around 1 in 50,000–70,000.
Winning a small state raffle with ~50,000 entrants – 1 in 50,000.
Correctly guessing a stranger’s 4-digit ATM PIN on the first try – 1 in 10,000.
Rolling a “Yahtzee” (five of a kind) on the first roll – 1 in 77,560.
My favorite is correctly guessing a stranger’s 4-digit ATM PIN on the first try!
That sums it up for me, thank you very much for playing!
In other words, virtually impossible!
And if you missed my original report, here it is:
SNAKE EYES 2.0? Bizarre Erika Kirk Video Surfaces
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
Buckle up folks, it’s time to add some more unexplainable details to this whole Charlie Kirk thing.
As usual, I don’t make the news or the facts, I just make sure I fact-check them well and then I report them.
What you do with it after that is entirely up to you.
Ok, allow me to explain what you are about to see and then I think these videos will make even more sense…
So 13 years ago, Erika Kirk (then Erika Frantzve) was Miss Arizona 2012 and that likely led to her starring in a music video for a band called Emerson Drive for the song “She’s My Kind of Crazy”.
Ok, fine.
Nothing weird yet. Good for her.
But there’s a moment in the video where she is zip-lining down Fremont Street in Las Vegas and the camera very clearly highlights her zip-lining right past a date-stamp or time-stamp of 9:10.
It looks like this:
That’s a screenshot I took with Erika in the black flying like a witch past 9:10.
I know, I know….just a random coincidence that Charlie Kirk was of course shot on September 10th?
Yes, maybe. And if this were the only thing I’d say nothing to see here. But on top of all the “Snake Eyes” weirdness we just keep stacking really strange coincidences.
Then you have a couple other oddities…
They are on Fremont Street and the origin and etymology of that word is “Freedom” — and of course Charlie was shot while wearing a white FREEDOM shirt.
But here’s the even bigger one to me…
Erika posted this comment to the video 13 years ago:
While it’s unclear who “Tyler” is, we have yet-again a Tyler and 9/10 connection, but here’s where it gets really weird…
Founding band member Brad Mates has a son named…..Tyler Robert Mates.
Folks, you can’t make this stuff up!
Are you getting it?
The main guy behind the band has a (son) named Tyler Robert(son)!
I will repeat what I keep saying over and over…one or two or three or even five of these things together could just be super weird coincidences, but at what point are there so many of them and so specific that it becomes statistically impossible for it to just be random coincidences?
That’s the question you have to answer for yourself, but I believe we’ve gone far over that line.
I don’t have an explanation beyond that, but I know this feels almost impossible at this point.
See it here:
Wait…. so let's get this straight.
13 years ago.. Erika Kirk did a music video that has 1.7M views on YouTube.
In the video she ziplines right past the timestamp 9:10. When was Charlie shot? …. oh yeah. 9/10
She goes in the comments of the video to thank Tyler… https://t.co/iMHLJl2DSi pic.twitter.com/oDGhNdKwpf
— Joe Rambo (@RamboAndFrens) September 27, 2025
Wait…. so let’s get this straight.
13 years ago.. Erika Kirk did a music video that has 1.7M views on YouTube.
In the video she ziplines right past the timestamp 9:10. When was Charlie shot? …. oh yeah. 9/10
She goes in the comments of the video to thank Tyler Robert (son of the lead singer) for having so much fun SHOOTING the video?
She ziplines down Freemont St?…
The meaning of Fremont is derived from French and Germanic roots, combining elements that lead to meanings such as “noble protector,” “protector of freedom,” or “freedom mountain”
What shirt was Charlie wearing… oh yeah that’s right. FREEDOM
We are being trolled. But nothing gets past anons. Great job frens. o7
If you missed the Snake Eyes dig we did on Thursday… I’ll post the link below.
Full video breaking it all down here:
Official music video here if you want to see for yourself.
Jump to about 2:30 for the zipline:
So there you go folks!
Add it to the list!
More on the “Snake Eyes” weirdness here in case you missed it:
ANOTHER UPDATE: The “Snake Eyes” Movie Also Connects To The Trump Butler Assassination Attempt!
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
This just continues to get more and more strange by the day…
In case you haven’t been following it, the 1998 movie “Snake Eyes” starring Nicolas Cage parallels the Charlie Kirk assassination in details that are (at least in my opinion) impossible to believe are all just random coincidences.
It’s far too many, and too close to write it off as just random chance.
Here is that full report in case you missed it:
Charlie Kirk “Snake Eyes” UPDATE
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
But now I want to advance the story.
Because it turns out the “Snake Eyes” movie didn’t only perfectly parallel the Charlie Kirk assassination but also the attempt on President Trump’s life that fateful day in Butler, PA.
A big hat-tip to my friend MJTruth who made this discovery:
Earlier today, I wrote about the movie Snake Eyes being eerily comparable to Charlie Kirk’s Assination.
This is the scene… and wow. The symbolism. See it?
H/t to @TWM316 for clip https://t.co/SGeOMI9RDH pic.twitter.com/E3c39HRLw4
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 25, 2025
Backup here if needed:
UPDATE: The “Snake Eyes” Movie Also Connects To The Trump Butler Assassination Attempt!
SOURCE: @MJTruthUltra
Posting for backup purposes pic.twitter.com/dkuAGy0Ttz
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 26, 2025
Ok, now in case you’re not immediately understanding what you’re seeing here, allow me to explain.
In the movie, Charles Kirkland is the politician who is assassinated, in the neck, in the exact same spot as Charlie Kirk. We know that part already from my prior reports.
But what many of us missed was as the bullet is flying by to take out Charles Kirkland, it grazes Nicolas Cage’s character (Rick Santoro).
And the video mashup shows that Cage and Trump reach their hand up to feel and then look at the blood coming from their ear in almost identical fashion.
Scroll up and watch again.
It’s uncanny!
If it were JUST this and nothing else, I’d say that’s a funny coincidence, but that’s all it is. Weird things happen.
But it’s not just that.
It’s that plus everything else I’ve been documenting so far:
Charlie Kirk “Snake Eyes” UPDATE
Yesterday, I brought you this really strange (but fact-checked 100% true) report about the impossible-to-believe connections between Charlie Kirk and the 1998 Nicolas Cage movie “Snake Eyes”.
If you haven’t seen that yet, you can see my full report here and no exaggeration this honestly will blow your mind:
This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk — How Is This Even Real?
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
And while there are too many “coincidences” in there to believe are just random chance, there’s actually one more that I missed.
Hat tip to my friend MJTruth who caught it.
It turns out that in the 1998 movie, a plot element is a Hurricane named JEZEBEL striking the New Jersey coast.
Take a look here:
UPDATE: Charlie Kirk — It just got weird…
The 1998 movie Snake Eyes is about a corrupt cop, who uncovers a conspiracy surrounding a political assassination at a public heavyweight boxing event.
In the movie, Charles Kirkland, the Secretary of Defense, was assassinated by a… pic.twitter.com/V0Z8ZjVO3L
— MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) September 25, 2025
UPDATE: Charlie Kirk — It just got weird…
The 1998 movie Snake Eyes is about a corrupt cop, who uncovers a conspiracy surrounding a political assassination at a public heavyweight boxing event.
In the movie, Charles Kirkland, the Secretary of Defense, was assassinated by a gunshot to the neck.
Charlie Kirk
Charles Kirkland
The assassination of Charles Kirkland in the movie took place in September.
But wait… it gets even weirder.
In the film, the heavyweight fight who “Took the Fall”, is named Lincoln TYLER, who allowed the assassin to get away, drawing parallels to TYLER Robinson, who is believed to be the fall guy.
Don’t leave just yet, it gets even weirder
Part of the movie was shot at the Trump Taj Mahal Hotel & Casino, in Atlantic City. Gilbert Powell—the sleazy arena director and defense contractor is explicitly noted as a character based on Donald Trump.
Gilbert Powell was part of the plot to orchestrate the assassination as part of a conspiracy involving a missile defense system deal.
In the movie, Dunne confessed that the trip to Norfolk was for a test of the AirGuard missile defense system, which Powell’s company was backing. He deduces that the sniper, a known Palestinian terrorist named Tariq Rabat, who was protesting weapons shipments to Israel, learned of the test and assassinated Kirkland in order to stop the sale of the system to the US government.
Also notable, throughout the film, a Hurricane named JEZEBEL strikes the Atlantic City coastline.
—— this is also notable given that we just learned that a popular website named Jezebel allegedly worked with an Etsy witch to cast a curse/Vex on Charlie Kirk.
That is just weird…
Ok, so that’s it right there at the end.
If you didn’t catch it, allow me to connect the dots for you.
Last week, we were one of the first to bring you reports that a group of Witches on Etsy were paid to put a curse on Charlie Kirk just days before his assassination.
That report was confirmed yesterday by Megyn Kelly:
UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Witchcraft Confirmed
/*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
So, what’s the connection to Jezebel?
A far-left website called Jezebel.com proudly bragged about how they had paid the Witches on Etsy to “curse” Charlie Kirk.
So there’s your JEZEBEL connection folks!
I am seriously asking you, how many “coincidences” does it take before it becomes statistically impossible?
I think wherever that line is, we have crossed it.
That’s just my opinion.
And allow me to address the Witchcraft issue, because I’ve seen all of your emails and complaints about the fact that I covered this story.
I want to address two things on this point…
First, for those of you emailing me saying Witchcraft is not real and I shouldn’t be talking about fake, made-up stuff like that, I’m sorry but the Bible disagrees with you. I’m not following it or promoting it, but the Bible does make very clear that it’s very real and we are to avoid it:
Old Testament
Exodus 22:18 — “You shall not permit a sorceress to live.”
Leviticus 19:26 — “You shall not eat anything with the blood, nor practice divination or soothsaying.”
Leviticus 20:6 — “If a person turns to mediums and familiar spirits, to prostitute himself with them, I will set My face against that person and cut him off from his people.”
Leviticus 20:27 — “A man or a woman who is a medium or who has familiar spirits shall surely be put to death.”
Deuteronomy 18:10–12 — “There shall not be found among you anyone who makes his son or daughter pass through the fire, or one who practices witchcraft, or a soothsayer, or one who interprets omens, or a sorcerer, or one who conjures spells, or a medium, or a spiritist, or one who calls up the dead. For all who do these things are an abomination to the Lord.”
2 Kings 9:22 — “…the harlotries of your mother Jezebel and her witchcraft are so many.”
2 Chronicles 33:6 — [Of Manasseh] “Also he caused his sons to pass through the fire in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom; he practiced soothsaying, used witchcraft and sorcery, and consulted mediums and spiritists.”
Micah 5:12 — “I will cut off sorceries from your hand, and you shall have no soothsayers.”
Nahum 3:4 — “Because of the multitude of harlotries of the seductive harlot, the mistress of sorceries, who sells nations through her harlotries, and families through her sorceries.”
New Testament
Acts 8:9–11 — Simon the sorcerer “astonished the people of Samaria, claiming that he was someone great… they heeded him because he had astonished them with his sorceries.”
Acts 13:6–8 — Elymas the sorcerer opposed Paul and Barnabas.
Acts 19:19 — Many who had practiced magic brought their books and burned them publicly.
Galatians 5:19–21 — Witchcraft (sorcery) is listed among the works of the flesh: “Now the works of the flesh are evident: adultery, fornication… idolatry, sorcery… those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.”
Revelation 9:21 — “And they did not repent of their murders or their sorceries or their sexual immorality or their thefts.”
Revelation 18:23 — “For by your sorcery all the nations were deceived.”
Revelation 21:8 — “But the cowardly, unbelieving, abominable, murderers, sexually immoral, sorcerers… shall have their part in the lake which burns with fire and brimstone.”
Revelation 22:15 — “But outside are dogs and sorcerers and sexually immoral and murderers and idolaters, and whoever loves and practices a lie.”
Ok, so that’s the first thing.
Second thing, for everyone emailing me to say a Christian like Charlie Kirk cannot be cursed by Witchcraft, I’m not entirely sure that is true. The Bible makes very clear that on this Earth we are engaged in a spiritual war. And in war there are casualties. If being a Christian gave you a magical cloak where nothing bad could ever happen to you, that would be nice but it’s not what the Bible (or life experience) teaches us.
But either way, whichever way you believe on that topic, that’s not the point of my reporting. The point of my reporting is that this event happened and it’s very disturbing. And according to Megyn Kelly, Charlie and Erika were aware of it and were very disturbed themselves, calling close trusted friends in for prayer.
Those are the reports directly from Megyn Kelly. I’m just the messenger. Believe whatever you want to believe, but the Jezebel / Etsy / Witchcraft Curse timeline did happen. Make of it what you will.
Here was my original report in case you missed it:
This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk — How Is This Even Real?
If you do not like “Conspiracy Theories” tune out now!
Actually, I take that back. That’s not fair.
What I’m about to show you is not a Conspiracy Theory of any kind. What I’m about to show you is simply FACTS that I have fact-checked myself and found to be 100% true.
The conclusion you want to draw after hearing these facts is up to you.
Sound good?
Ok, let’s dig in because I am about to completely blow your mind.
Do you remember the 1998 movie “Snake Eyes” starring Nicolas Cage?
It was a great movie, and in fact in hindsight Nicolas Cage has put out a ton of iconic movies.
Ever seen “Matchstick Men”? Such a great and underrated movie!
But back to “Snake Eyes”…
This movie, released in 1998 (when Charlie Kirk would have been 5 years old), features all of the following:
A politician named Charles Kirkland (gee, kind of sounds like Charlie Kirk doesn’t it?)
Charles Kirkland is assassinated
Charles Kirkland is shot in the neck
The assassination happens on September 10th (Charlie Kirk was assassinated on September 10th)
There is a boxer in the movie named Tyler whose nickname is “The Executioner”
For those of you into such things, the names “Tyler Robinson” and “Lincoln Tyler” in reverse ordinal gematria both total 165
Oh and it’s currently the Chinese Year of the ….. Snake (Snake Eyes)
I will document each of these things down below to show you it’s fact-checked 100% true, but for now just watch this:
There are NO COINCIDENCES.
The 1998 Movie "Snake Eyes" with actor Nicholas Cage, the politician CHARLES KIRKLAND is shot in the neck.
In the movie, the shooting happens on SEPTEMBER 10th.
Charlie Kirk was shot in the neck, in real life on September 10th.
You just can't make… pic.twitter.com/zNiqchI4mK
— The SCIF (@TheSCIF) September 24, 2025
TRANSCRIPT:
There’s a movie called Snake Eyes, which came out in 1998, and in that movie, U.S. politician Charles Kirkland is assassinated at a live event by a shot through the neck. Charles Kirkland, like Charles Kirk, and obviously Charlie Kirk was also shot in the neck allegedly, right? Well, in the movie Snake Eyes, the heavyweight boxer Lincoln Tyler is in the ring during the assassination.
Tyler, like Tyler Robinson, and in gematria, Lincoln Tyler is 165, like Tyler Robinson is 165, and his nickname is The Executioner, okay? Well, the big part here, guys, in the movie Snake Eyes, the assassination occurs on September 10th. Charlie Kirk was allegedly assassinated on September 10th.
Can you believe this, guys? You guys gotta share this with everyone you can. This is undeniable. And also see how Nicolas Cage is doing the hands like Charlie Kirk, also Donald Trump does that hand sign, and also we’re in the Year of the Snake right now. It’s called Snake Eyes. But wow, just, you put that all together — Charles Kirkland shot in the neck, Lincoln Tyler equals Tyler Robinson, and you’re telling me the assassination in the movie happened on September 10th, the same day the Charlie Kirk event happened?
Oh my goodness. And guys, I can’t take credit for this. Um, shout out to Bernard Suarez, or Bernardo Suarez, sorry. Um, he left me this comment. I also saw him on the Ball Don’t Lie channel earlier tonight talking about this. He said, “Have you ever watched the ’98 movie Snake Eyes where the character Charles Kirkland is assassinated with a shot in the neck, and there’s a boxer named Tyler who has the nickname Executioner?” And then Decoding With Cody let me know that the shooting in the film is on September 10th.
Backup video here if needed:
This Is IMPOSSIBLE To Believe About Charlie Kirk — How Is This Real? pic.twitter.com/9oau2mIQb2
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 24, 2025
Ok, now let me document and fact-check this for you.
Let’s start with the name, Charles Kirkland — this is a pretty easy one to confirm:
You can also confirm all of these by simply watching the movie too, by the way. It’s available on Paramount+.
Notice how I am not asking ChatGPT leading questions…
Next up, the assassination is confirmed — it happens in the opening scene and forms the basis for the rest of the murder-mystery plot:
Notice how ChatGPT does not know the September 10th date, but it’s a good thing I’m smarter than these AI robots!
You can still count on Noah to get the job done even when ChatGPT fails!
In the opening scene, the camera very intentionally flashes to the marquee which confirms two things: the boxer name TYLER THE EXECUTIONER (note how TYLER is even emphasized) and the date of September 10th is clearly visible:
That freeze frame is a LITTLE hard to read the 10th (could argue it’s the 18th) but in the video it’s pretty clear it’s the 10th.
You can watch the video here:
Backup here if needed:
Snake Eyes (1998): Opening Scene pic.twitter.com/cViTGeYwmQ
— Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 24, 2025
If that’s not enough, you can confirm all of this in the written script that you can read on Scribd:
Now the shot in the neck…
Here’s a screenshot of Charles Kirkland getting shot in the neck in the movie — almost the EXACT identical same spot as Charlie Kirk:
And it’s not really my thing, but for those of you interested in this stuff, here is the Gematria name-value confirmation as well:
And of course you know there’s always going to be symbolism, right?
How about flashing the “All Seeing Eye” in the air the moment before the shot rings out?
Ok, now to steal a phrase from Steve Jobs and Columbo: “One more thing…”
Remember what the tagline was from that movie?
“Believe everything except your eyes.”
Wow.
Look, I’m not saying I believe all of this proves it was fake and staged and Charlie is still alive….I’m not going there. I’m just saying at what point does all of this become too much to be a coincidence?
I’ll let YOU answer that!
I told you I was only going to report facts and that’s what I did.
What you do with this information is up to you…
All just one big coincidence?
I find that almost impossible to believe, but I am interested to hear your thoughts below!
Noah out.
What do you think?
This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.
The post CHARLIE KIRK FLASHBACK PART 3: Odds Of All The Extremely Bizarre “Snake Eyes” + Emerson Drive Coincidences = 1 in 3.3 Quintillion! appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.
New Posts (Home)
ChatBox
Popular Posts 
Game Zone
Top PodCasts
