A growing coalition of climate activists, anti-Israel protesters, and communist-linked movements has found a new common cause: shutting down American AI data centers. That is the finding of a new investigation from Fox News Digital, which reported that these disparate activist groups are increasingly converging around campaigns that experts say weaken America’s competitive position against China in the global AI race. Fox News Digital laid out the warning this way: Climate activists, anti-Israel protesters and other activist movements with very different agendas have become strange bedfellows united by a shared disdain for America and funding from China, according to experts who warn the trend is weakening the United States amid a rapidly accelerating AI race. Critics say the same activist ecosystem is now targeting America’s AI infrastructure and industrial power, in a development that experts warn could undermine the United States in its technological competition with China. The growing convergence increasingly includes communist and Islamist activist movements, and it recently extended into campaigns targeting America’s artificial intelligence data centers, with activist and environmental groups helping delay or block dozens of such projects worth billions of dollars over concerns about energy use, water consumption and environmental impact amid rising power demand. Fox News Digital has observed many of the movements protesting side-by-side at demonstrations across the country despite their otherwise stark ideological differences. Activists from CodePink, which Fox described as a far-left feminist activist group that has received funds from Neville Roy Singham, recently circulated a video attacking a Utah data center project backed by investor Kevin O’Leary. Climate activists, anti-Israel protesters, and anti-AI groups now target U.S. data centers worth billions — forming what experts call a 'red-green-green alliance' that weakens America's tech race against China. Hudson Institute fellow says the common thread binding these… pic.twitter.com/5MS9MSFHw9 — Fox News Politics (@foxnewspolitics) May 24, 2026 Zineb Riboua, a fellow at the Hudson Institute, told Fox News Digital that the pattern is unmistakable. Fox News Digital quoted Riboua directly: “What all of these protests have in common — the protests against AI data centers or the environmental protests or the protest against Israel — is that anti-American trend within them,” Hudson Institute fellow Zineb Riboua told Fox News Digital. “Climate change was also one of those very trendy causes to protest for or against, and now there’s always this quest to find what is the next thing to revolutionize,” Riboua added. “And this revolution against the United States is always welcome, no matter what type of forms and shapes it takes.” Fox News Digital also reported that Singham, a U.S.-born tech tycoon living in Shanghai, “funneled roughly $285 million into six activist nonprofits accused by lawmakers and analysts of promoting pro-China narratives and anti-American protest movements.” The report tied those accusations to lawmakers and analysts, keeping the funding claim focused on the reported activist network rather than every protester on the ground. Riboua warned that “Third Worldism” casts the United States and the West as the source of global problems, uniting otherwise unrelated activist causes under one anti-Western framework. Energy expert Brenda Shaffer described what she sees as a “red-green-green alliance” involving communist movements, Islamist activism, and environmental protest groups. Shaffer warned that energy is the backbone of the AI race, and that China stands to benefit directly when Western countries sabotage their own energy and industrial capacity from within. Fox News Digital also quoted Shaffer on the energy stakes behind the AI race: Energy expert Brenda Shaffer, a research faculty member at the U.S. Naval Postgraduate School, described the broader activist convergence as part of a “red-green-green alliance,” an ideological overlap between three elements: communist movements, characterized by the color red; Islamist activism, described as green; and environmental protest groups, symbolized as green. Shaffer warned the growing convergence is increasingly affecting industries critical to America’s economic and technological competition with China. “Energy is crucial to the AI race, to the data centers,” Shaffer told Fox News Digital, arguing that while activist groups in the West target fossil fuels, AI infrastructure, and industrial development, China continues rapidly expanding coal production, manufacturing capacity, and energy generation. “China really benefits from these policies that we adopt and we just let them keep forging ahead with coal,” Shaffer said, comparing the pattern to Cold War-era anti-nuclear activism that benefited Soviet energy leverage in Europe. Shaffer also warned that Western dependence on Chinese renewable-energy supply chains can create strategic vulnerabilities because China dominates major parts of the global solar and inverter market. Expert warns ‘red-green-green alliance’ helping China gain AI edge https://t.co/wyo4aAi3ey via @@YahooNews — Brenda Shaffer (@ProfBShaffer) May 24, 2026 The concern is not hypothetical. Fox News Digital previously reported that Neville Roy Singham, a U.S.-born tech tycoon living in Shanghai, funneled roughly $285 million into six activist nonprofits. Lawmakers and analysts have accused those nonprofits of promoting pro-China narratives and fueling anti-American protest movements. Fox noted that activist groups have also targeted a Utah data center project backed by investor Kevin O’Leary, though Fox reported it had not independently verified O’Leary’s specific claim that China-linked funding was behind the Utah opposition. Climate activists, anti-Israel protesters, and anti-AI groups are now coordinating attacks on U.S. data centers. Three movements with nothing in common ideologically except one thing: opposition to America. A Hudson Institute fellow calls it a "red-green-green alliance." The… https://t.co/LTQGhC5bsV pic.twitter.com/LR9e5rSovN — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) May 24, 2026 The bigger picture is hard to ignore. The United States is in an all-out sprint to build the AI infrastructure needed to stay ahead of China, and President Trump has made energy dominance and AI leadership central pillars of his agenda. Every data center that gets blocked or delayed is a win for Beijing, whether the activists on the ground realize it or not. The convergence of these movements around anti-data-center campaigns represents a serious strategic vulnerability at exactly the moment America can least afford one. When the climate movement, anti-Israel radicals, and communist sympathizers all end up pulling in the same direction, it is worth asking who benefits most from the result. The answer is not the United States.

I had Bo Polny on my show a couple days ago over on The Daily Truth Report and I wanted to make sure you didn’t miss it. Bo had a ton of brand new things to share and let’s just say I think you’re going to really like this! Bitcoin. XRP. Gold. Silver. If you’re bored now, that’s because it’s about to RIP….and from there, extremely volatile up and down. I’ll just let Bo tell you, full report right here: Bo Polny’s website (Newsletter Signup): https://www.gold2020forecast.com Cryptocurrency School, The ABC’s of How/Where to Start: https://www.easycryptoschool.com Promo Code: WLT49 Download Bo’s slides for free: https://qrco.de/bfnxi0 Backup here on Rumble if needed: !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2oodx”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”); Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v781xpc”,”div”:”rumble_v781xpc”}); If you want Bo’s trading Newsletter, go to https://www.gold2020forecast.com/cryptocurrency-index ➡️ use code WLT49 (LIMITED TIME DISCOUNT) For access to the Easy Crypto School, go to https://www.easycryptoschool.com ➡️ use code WLT49 (LIMITED TIME DISCOUNT) Oh and if you want to get a copy of Bo’s book in case you don’t win the raffle, it’s beautiful! Order direct on Bo’s website and get a 20% discount here: Or grab it on Amazon if you prefer (finally back in stock, the new and updated Jubilee Edition): GET BO’S BOOK ON AMAZON HERE And now allow me to end with this… If you don’t have any gold and silver yet — or don’t have ENOUGH gold and silver yet — I have TWO great options for you. And one can get you gold for no money out of pocket! How do you like that? BOOM! First, you may recognize Andy Schectman from Miles Franklin. He’s prolific on YouTube and just a brilliant guy, I’ve followed him for years. I’ve partnered up with Andy’s company, Miles Franklin, and I’m really excited to show you what they can do! In fact, Andy’s going to be coming on my show, the Daily Truth Report (follow us on YouTube and Rumble) in the future, and you’re going to want to make sure you don’t miss those. Andy is a wealth of knowledge about the precious metals markets and crypto, and I’ve covered him here many times in the past. Now I’ll get to chat with him myself, and I’m really looking forward to it. I’m spoken directly with Andy and his team and they have assured me they will take very good care of anyone in the WLT Report family (that’s you!). At Miles Franklin, everyone gets personal attention from their team of brokers and you’ll get whatever level of hand-holding you prefer.  They’ll also customize a deal just for you, but you have to call them and tell them NOAH sent you!  They’ll handle it from there.  1-952-929-7006 There is no minimum order size and no maximum limit. I think you’ll love working with them, I already do! You can reach them at 1-952-929-7006 and make sure you let them know that Noah sent you over, they’ve promised me the best of the best service and pricing for everyone in the WLT Report family.  Second option is a company I’ve talked about many times before, it’s Genesis Gold. I’ve worked with Genesis Gold for three years now, and they are excellent at what they do. Genesis Gold is for people who want to purchase real physical gold or silver in their IRAs (Investment Retirement Accounts). You know what the beauty of that is? Two huge benefits actually… One is that it’s TAX FREE baby! I’m not a tax advisor, but that’s a general oversimplification. Never pay more taxes than you are legally required to pay. And that’s why I love getting gold and silver in my IRA (and why I hold a large chunk in an IRA myself!). The other is if you simply shift money out of stocks (like Peter Schiff recommends) and into Gold, it won’t cost you anything!  No money out of pocket!   BOOM! There’s so much to love about Genesis Gold, starting with the fact they are proudly and un-ashamedly Christina! They call it “Faith-Driven Stewardship” and they put it right on the homepage of their website along with a quote from Ezekiel: Wealth Preservation With Gold & Silver – The Genesis Gold IRA By your wisdom and your understanding you have made wealth for yourself, and have gathered Gold and Silver into your treasuries – EZEKIEL 28:4 Genesis Gold Group believes the Bible gives clues on how man-made currencies (paper money) represent instability, and a lack of virtue and encourages living wastefully in excess. Conflicts have beleaguered us since the dawn of civilization, and they can all be encapsulated into one battle. The battle is between currency, man-made paper, and gold and silver — the two precious metals found in our Earth’s crust, sent to us by our Lord to use as money. Man-made currency always leads nations down the path to increased war, greed, and ultimate collapse. History has shown that abandoning gold and silver has always been a bad idea. Gold and Silver enforce discipline, nurture self-constraint, self-reliance, and balance, and lead to confidence, a restrained government, and a more stable foreign policy. Genesis Gold Group believes in empowering faith-driven stewardship with Gold & Silver are an integral part of a balanced portfolio. Protecting your finances with precious metals has never been more crucial during these trying times. With a combined 50-plus years in the precious metals industry, let your Genesis gold and silver experts guide you through the simplicity of asset protection and growth with our Genesis Gold IRA. Sincerely, Genesis Gold Group Empowering Faith-Driven Stewardship Oh….and they’re VERY good at what they do. You also get physical gold and silver with Genesis, believe it or not!  The gold and silver is purchased for you (in whatever combination of coins and bars you prefer, a picture taken and sent to you, and then stored safely in a vault for you! I love what these guys are doing. Here’s more on why gold and silver in your IRA are so powerful: You can contact Genesis Gold here. They are also very backed up with record demand, so you may have to wait a bit, but someone WILL get in touch with you for personal customer service and assistance! Tell ’em Noah sent ya! Oh, and did you know Genesis is recommended by SUPERMAN himself? It’s true. Superman himself, Clark Kent — Dean Cain — came on my show a few weeks ago and we broke it all down: Watch here: Stay safe!   This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

President Trump announced Saturday that an agreement between the United States, Iran, and several regional partners has been “largely negotiated, subject to finalization.” The statement, released through the White House, identifies the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz as a key provision of the emerging deal and names multiple countries as parties to the broader framework. If finalized, it would mark one of the most significant diplomatic developments of Trump’s presidency and a dramatic turn in a conflict that has roiled global energy markets for months. The announcement comes after 84 days of intensifying pressure on Tehran, during which the Trump administration paired crippling sanctions enforcement with direct and indirect diplomacy across the Middle East. The Strait of Hormuz, the narrow waterway through which roughly one-fifth of the world’s oil supply passes daily, has been at the center of the standoff. Secretary of State Marco Rubio laid the groundwork for these negotiations just one day earlier, warning that any Iranian attempt to impose a tolling system on the Strait would set a dangerous precedent worldwide. Rubio’s framing was deliberate. By connecting freedom of navigation in the Strait to the interests of Indo-Pacific nations and global commerce, the administration built a multilateral case for why Iran could not be allowed to weaponize the waterway. That pressure appears to have moved the needle. The deal is not done. That distinction matters, and Trump’s own language makes it clear. “Largely negotiated, subject to finalization” is a precise phrase. It signals significant progress while leaving room for the hardest parts of the negotiation, which are almost certainly still ahead. The critical unresolved questions center on Iran’s nuclear program, enriched uranium, and whether Tehran will actually comply with the final terms. Iranian compliance is the other open question. Tehran’s track record of cheating on international agreements is long and well-documented. That is why the final text, not the announcement alone, will matter. What Trump has accomplished so far is real. He took a regime that thumbed its nose at the international community for years, applied sustained economic and military pressure, and brought it to the negotiating table under terms favorable to the United States and its allies. The Strait of Hormuz provision alone, if it holds, would be a tangible win for global energy security and a direct rebuke to Iran’s strategy of maritime coercion. But the finish line is not the same as the starting line. The nuclear terms and enforcement mechanisms that emerge in the final text will determine whether this becomes a landmark achievement or another piece of paper Tehran ignores. The next days and weeks will tell the story. For now, this is maximum pressure diplomacy producing results, exactly as Trump said it would. The White House put the President’s announcement in plain terms: "An Agreement has been largely negotiated, subject to finalization between the United States of America, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the various other Countries, as listed…" – President Donald J. Trump pic.twitter.com/Z49bOkkUoh — The White House (@WhiteHouse) May 23, 2026 International outlets quickly picked up the same core point: the Strait of Hormuz is at the center of the proposed framework. US President Donald Trump says a proposed peace deal with Iran is 'largely negotiated' and awaiting finalisation. Trump said the agreement includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz and follows discussions with leaders across West Asia. pic.twitter.com/8EBBELO5Ys — Firstpost (@firstpost) May 24, 2026 The White House and Fox News laid out the main Trump announcement this way: The White House amplified President Trump’s statement that an agreement has been largely negotiated, subject to finalization, between the United States, Iran, and the other countries involved. The statement followed what President Trump described as a very good call with leaders from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Pakistan, Turkiye, Egypt, Jordan, and Bahrain. President Trump also said a separate call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went very well. The President said final aspects and details are still being discussed and will be announced shortly. The concrete provision with global consequences is the Strait of Hormuz. Opening the Strait is a key element of the deal, and that turns the story from routine diplomatic language into a global energy story. A regional diplomat told Fox News the discussions were very positive and that regional leaders were highly supportive of the breakthrough President Trump achieved through the talks. The sequence is the point: pressure first, regional coalition second, then a deal Iran now has to finalize under public scrutiny. The State Department and Fox News show why the Strait of Hormuz issue matters far beyond one regional deal: Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that if Iran creates a tolling system in the Strait of Hormuz, the same model could spread to other critical waterways around the world. Rubio said the Strait is vital to every country represented in the discussion, and especially to the Indo-Pacific. That is why the Hormuz piece is not a side issue. The Strait is one of the world’s most important energy chokepoints, and any Iranian attempt to turn it into a toll road would put pressure on shipping, oil markets, and American allies. Any resolution would require Iran to keep the Strait of Hormuz open without tolls. Rubio also emphasized that Iran must surrender its enriched uranium, keeping the nuclear issue at the center of any real deal. That gives the Trump administration a clear line: diplomacy can move forward, but Iran does not get rewarded for keeping leverage over global energy or nuclear weapons material. It also keeps the story from becoming a ceremonial peace announcement before the hardest enforcement terms are nailed down. Al-Monitor and Fox News live updates added the caution and next-step details: Al-Monitor reported the United States and Iran sought on Sunday to finalize an agreement after President Trump said a proposal including the opening of the blockaded Strait of Hormuz was largely negotiated. The deal remains subject to finalization, and Iranian officials have indicated that gaps still exist. Al-Monitor reported that Pakistan hoped to host another round of talks soon, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif saying the call offered a useful chance to move peace efforts forward. The same report said Iranian officials were still separating the initial framework from the harder nuclear-program dispute. Fox News live updates reported a regional source said U.S. forces would remain near Iran for 30 days under the deal being discussed. The same update said Iran would receive oil sanctions waivers and access to frozen funds and assets worth billions of dollars. Fox News also reported Israel pressed to preserve freedom of action against Hezbollah in Lebanon, while President Trump stood firm on dismantling Iran’s nuclear program and removing enriched uranium. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

A Chinese AI startup says it has cracked the code on what your dog is trying to tell you, and the internet is having a field day with it. The company behind PettiChat claims its wearable device can translate pet vocalizations and behavior into human language with up to 95 percent accuracy. That number went viral after Polymarket posted the claim to X. PettiChat describes itself as the “world’s first real-time pet translator” and is currently raising money on Kickstarter. The device is a small wearable that attaches to a pet’s collar and pairs with a smartphone app. According to the company’s press materials, the AI model was trained on large datasets of animal vocalizations, body language signals, and behavioral samples across multiple breeds. The company cites a 94.6 percent real-time translation accuracy figure and says its model was trained on more than one million vocal and behavior samples. Here is the important part: that accuracy figure is entirely a company claim. The company may have internal testing behind the pitch, but the public case still depends on PettiChat’s own materials rather than outside verification. The skepticism online was immediate and, frankly, pretty entertaining. That response from tech commentator Corey Quinn basically sums up where a lot of people landed on this one. If your dog is barking at the front door, you do not need a $100 AI collar to tell you he wants to go outside. And if your cat is screaming at 3 a.m., the translation is always the same: feed me or suffer. The AI space is full of extraordinary promises right now. Some of them are real. Some of them are vaporware dressed up with a slick press release and a crowdfunding page. PettiChat might turn out to be a genuinely useful tool for understanding broad pet emotions. Or it might tell every dog owner in America that their golden retriever is hungry and loves them, which, again, you already knew. Until someone outside the company actually tests these claims with real science, the 95 percent number is marketing, not fact. Enjoy the memes in the meantime. Polymarket put the strange claim into the social-media bloodstream: NEW: Chinese AI pet translating startup claims it can interpret pets' speech with up to 95% accuracy. — Polymarket (@Polymarket) May 23, 2026 The immediate reaction from the tech world was part fascination, part disbelief: Every AI pet translator output is “I love you and I am hungry.” Congratulations, you've built a 95% accurate model because that's also 95% of what the dog is thinking. https://t.co/nSYs4FkHQz — Corey Quinn (@QuinnyPig) May 23, 2026 Polymarket put the claim in front of a wider audience, while Dexerto tracked the viral AI pet translator story this way: Polymarket wrote that a Chinese AI pet translating startup claims it can interpret pets’ speech with up to 95 percent accuracy. That phrasing matters. The post did not prove the figure. It highlighted a claim from the startup behind the product, which is exactly how this story should be read. Dexerto reported that a China-based startup claims to have invented an AI-powered device capable of translating pet behavior and vocalizations into human speech. Dexerto’s own framing treated the product as a viral entertainment-tech story built around a startling accuracy claim, not as a settled scientific breakthrough. The viral hook is obvious: millions of pet owners have wondered what their dogs or cats are trying to tell them. The harder question is whether an AI collar can do more than guess from sounds, body language, repeated behavior patterns, and a well-edited product demo. PettiChat and its PR Newswire release describe the device and the company’s accuracy claims in more detail: PettiChat says its product is a wearable pet translator built for a two-way conversation between owners and pets. On its own site, the company claims Pettichat uses advanced AI to deliver 94.6 percent real-time translation accuracy and translates automatically in 1.2 seconds. In its April 14, 2026 Kickstarter announcement, PettiChat said the device weighs 27 grams and uses a specialized AI model trained on more than one million vocal and behavior samples. The company also said its team spent two years testing the device on more than one thousand real cats and dogs. PettiChat’s release says the device can translate pet sounds into human language and also turn human words into sounds pets instinctively recognize. The company framed the product as a bond-building tool for pet owners, with chat history in the companion app and an integrated location feature. PettiChat said early Kickstarter rewards included a $119 “Super Early Bird” slot, and the company claimed $1 million in angel funding to support production and delivery. HotHardware added the necessary skepticism around what this technology may actually be able to do: HotHardware described PettiChat as an AI-powered smart collar, but it also flagged the size of the company’s leap from pattern detection to near-perfect real-time translation. Decoding pitch, tone, and context to estimate whether a pet is angry, hungry, or playful is scientifically plausible. But translating a bark or meow into a specific English sentence is a much bigger claim. The story also carries the usual crowdfunding caution: slick demos and bold claims can arrive long before ordinary buyers get a finished product in their hands. That caution is especially important when the selling point is not just a gadget, but a promise to cross the language barrier between humans and animals. HotHardware’s bottom line was blunt: if the product ships, early backers may be better off expecting an amusing novelty than a true Dr. Dolittle experience. That is the key tension in this story. The claim is fascinating, but the proof still has to catch up with the pitch. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

A federal terrorism case out of the Southern District of New York has revealed one of the most chilling assassination plots against a member of the President Trump’s family ever made public. According to sources cited by the New York Post, Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood Al-Saadi, an alleged commander linked to both Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Iraqi militia Kata’ib Hizballah, personally targeted President Trump’s daughter, Ivanka, for assassination. The motive, per reporting: revenge for President Trump’s January 2020 drone strike that killed IRGC Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani in Baghdad. The federal complaint, filed by prosecutors in the Southern District of New York and available through the Justice Department, charges Al-Saadi with terrorism-related offenses tied to plots against targets on U.S. soil. Sources familiar with the investigation told the Post that Al-Saadi viewed Ivanka as a high-value target and sought to “burn down the house of Trump” in retaliation for the Soleimani operation. Al-Saadi is described in reporting as a senior figure within the Iran-backed militia network that has long threatened American personnel and interests across the Middle East. Kata’ib Hizballah has been designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. State Department since 2009 and is responsible for hundreds of attacks on American troops in Iraq. The Soleimani strike remains one of the most consequential national security decisions of President Trump’s first term. Soleimani was the architect of Iran’s proxy war apparatus across the region, and his killing was celebrated by many in the national security community but drew immediate vows of revenge from Tehran and its allied militias. Those threats, it now appears, extended directly to the President’s own family. As Breitbart reported, the plot underscores the persistent and personal nature of Iranian-backed terrorism threats against American leaders and their families. The case is a stark reminder that the Iranian regime and its proxies have never stopped plotting violence against Americans, including those closest to the President. It also raises serious questions about how many similar threats have been intercepted, and how many more may still be active. Federal law enforcement deserves credit for dismantling this particular plot before it could be carried out. But the fact that an IRGC-linked terrorist commander was allegedly working to murder the President’s daughter on American soil should send a clear message to every policymaker in Washington: the Iranian-backed threat has already reached federal court, Jewish targets, American interests, and now, according to source reporting, President Trump’s own family. The New York Post put the allegation on its cover as the story spread: Today’s cover: Ivanka Trump targeted for assassination by IRGC terrorist in twisted plot to avenge president taking out his mentor: sources https://t.co/3J6M6jg7P2 pic.twitter.com/AoKmiSsplo — New York Post (@nypost) May 23, 2026 The Daily Caller also picked up the reported threat against the Trump family: Prominent Member Of Trump Family Reportedly Targeted For Assassination By Foreign Agent: 'Burn down the house of Trump' https://t.co/7IKgN8isT2 — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) May 23, 2026 The New York Post reported the Ivanka Trump targeting allegation: Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood Al-Saadi was identified in source reporting as the man who allegedly targeted Ivanka Trump for assassination. The allegation is that Al-Saadi, described as an Iraqi national and alleged Iranian-backed terrorist figure, wanted revenge for the 2020 U.S. drone strike ordered by President Trump that killed Iranian Quds Force commander Qasem Soleimani. The Post cited sources saying Al-Saadi had a blueprint of Ivanka Trump’s Florida home. Entifadh Qanbar, a former deputy military attache at the Iraqi embassy in Washington, told the outlet that after Soleimani was killed, Al-Saadi spoke about killing Ivanka to burn down the house of Trump. That Ivanka-specific allegation sits on top of a broader federal terrorism case already moving through the Southern District of New York. The distinction matters: the source reporting names Ivanka as the alleged target, while the court case supplies the official terrorism-case foundation. The Associated Press reported on the federal terrorism case against Al-Saadi: Mohammad Baqer Saad Dawood Al-Saadi is accused of plotting at least 18 terror attacks in Europe in retaliation for the U.S. and Israel war with Iran. The complaint says he sought to attack a New York City synagogue and provided an undercover law-enforcement officer with photos and maps of Jewish centers in Los Angeles and Scottsdale, Arizona, that he planned to target. He is also accused of involvement in two recent attacks in Canada: an attack on a synagogue and a shooting at the U.S. consulate in Toronto. Federal prosecutors said he directed and urged attacks on U.S. and Israeli interests, including killing Americans and Jews. Al-Saadi is charged with conspiracy to provide material support to Kata’ib Hizballah, an Iran-backed Iraqi Shia militant group, and Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. He also faces terrorism and bombing-related conspiracy counts that could carry life in prison if convicted. The Justice Department complaint provides the primary-source backbone for the federal case: The federal complaint charges Al-Saadi with terrorism-related offenses tied to alleged support for Kata’ib Hizballah and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The complaint provides the official case backbone for the alleged attack network, including the planned attacks on Jewish and American targets. It does not need to do the work of the separate Ivanka-source allegation to make the case serious. The federal filing already describes a defendant accused of coordinating or encouraging attacks across borders, seeking targets in the United States, and supporting designated foreign terrorist organizations. The document describes a defendant allegedly tied to a campaign that reached across Europe, Canada, and the United States, with attacks and planned attacks aimed at American, Israeli, and Jewish interests. That is why the Ivanka allegation lands inside a larger national-security frame rather than as an isolated threat. The reported target was President Trump’s daughter, but the alleged pattern reaches U.S., Israeli, and Jewish targets across multiple countries. Breitbart also followed the report and connected it to President Trump’s strike on Soleimani: The report framed the alleged Ivanka target as revenge for President Trump’s elimination of Qasem Soleimani. Soleimani was killed in a U.S. strike in Baghdad in January 2020 during President Trump’s first term. For years, Iranian-backed actors and sympathizers have treated that strike as a grievance to be answered. The allegation against Al-Saadi fits that pattern: a Trump family member allegedly targeted in a twisted attempt to make the president pay personally for taking out one of Iran’s most powerful terror commanders. The report also repeated Qanbar’s account that Al-Saadi spoke of killing Ivanka to burn down the house of Trump. That is the political and security stakes of the story. This was not merely another abstract terror case; source reporting says the threat reached directly into the family of the president who ordered the strike on Soleimani. Seen beside the federal case, the alleged Ivanka plot shows why the Trump administration’s hard line on Iranian-backed terror networks remains a live domestic-security issue, not just a foreign-policy debate inside Washington. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.