Vanessa Trump just shared an update on her health following a breast cancer diagnosis last month. In a post on Instagram, she announced that she is currently recovering from surgery. She says that the next step will be to begin the second stage of treatment, but did not specify what this entails. See her post here: If you don’t know, Vanessa is Donald Trump Jr.’s ex-wife. Together, they had five children, including their eldest, Kai. Now, she is dating Tiger Woods, who has reportedly been supportive throughout her treatment amid his own struggles. From People: The health update came a day after Woods was spotted back home in Florida after going to rehab in Switzerland. The pro golfer underwent treatment overseas following his car crash and DUI charge. He pleaded not guilty to the charges on March 31, according to court documents obtained by PEOPLE. Woods completed six weeks of treatment from April to early May before returning to the U.S. on May 13 to support Trump amid her breast cancer diagnosis, sources told PEOPLE. Woods and Trump “are optimistic about her treatments and in the coming months battling breast cancer,” a source in Jupiter tells PEOPLE. “Like anyone diagnosed with this disease, she is anxious but also strong and eager to move beyond,” says the source. “She is loved and receiving a great deal of support … With all of the advanced treatments and excellent healthcare facilities around her, Vanessa will continue to receive top-notch care.” The insider added that the mom-of-five “will face some challenges in treatment but is equipped to handle it.” Prayers for a full recovery! If it were me, I’d be looking into THIS immediately: CANCER CURE KNOWN? Rick Hill Joins Me To Share How He Defeated STAGE 3 Terminal Cancer! [EXTREMELY CENSORED] /*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js I just got done with what might be the most important interview I’ve ever done. Why? Because a healthy person wants a million things in life, but a sick person only wants one.  To get better. So if you have cancer or know someone who has cancer, you’re going to want to watch this immediately! Bookmark it too. And I suppose before I get into it I’d better print my standard FDA disclaimer and get this out of the way: Ok, we good? All good with the suits? Ok, now let’s dig in. I am so glad I got to meet Rick Hill today and hear his story. I have no idea how I never heard this before, but 50 years ago Rick was diagnosed with aggressive Stage 3 terminal cancer, which he has documented by a letter from the Mayo Clinic. It was real and it was bad. The doctors basically told him to say his goodbyes to his family because he would be dead in days or maybe weeks, but probably days. Then through a series of strange events Rick finds himself checking out of the Mayo Clinic and heading down to Tijuana for a treatment regiment that had him cancer free in 21 days. Look folks, I’m just telling his story and you can do with it what you will, but I want to get this message out to as many people as we possibly can. Oh, and it’s not just Rick’s story, not just some one off. In fact, there is a book documenting hundreds of case studies of similar results going back decades, all tied to the Richardson Cancer Clinic: I’m telling you folks, this blew me away! And speaking of books, have you heard of “The Creature From Jekyll Island”? It’s a pretty famous book exposing the Federal Reserve Bank, but until today I had no idea that the author wrote a second book….about the very protocol that saved Rick Hill’s life: This community has been MAHA 50+ years before RFK Jr. came along! It’s truly incredible, but they’re facing extreme censorship for their message so I was only able to upload this to Rumble and X, and I have those links for you below. Trust me when I tell you this is a must watch…. Please enjoy: !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2oodx”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”); Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v6wbkbc”,”div”:”rumble_v6wbkbc”}); Backup here on X if you prefer: CANCER CURE KNOWN? Rick Hill shares how he defeated STAGE 3 terminal cancer! pic.twitter.com/psRERxmRXb — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) September 4, 2025 And now here are all the links you need… Everything we discussed in the interview can be found here: https://rncstore.com They were nice enough to set me up with a promo code so use WLT at checkout and it will save you 10% off whatever you order. If you want a free copy of the G. Edward Griffin book go here: http://myworldwithoutcancer.com Get Rick’s Bundles here: https://rncstore.com/WLT-RicksBundles Please help me get this message out to as many people as possible… I’m not claiming I can cure cancer, but we might just save a life or two or a thousand if we can get this message out. And I would also add this: I would never advise anyone to STOP their current cancer treatments if you are on them.  The only thing I would say is what do you have to lose?  Why not try this in parallel?  If Rick and all the other people giving their testimonies are wrong and it doesn’t work for you, what harm is there in trying?  It reminds me so much of when President Trump passed “Right To Try” and said let them try!  What do you have to lose?  Exactly!  That would be how I would approach it, and I also plan to start taking a daily dose as preventative care. Thank you! And a big hat tip to Rick, it was a real pleasure chatting with you today!  Please come back on the show again soon. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Vanessa Trump Shares Health Update After Breast Cancer Diagnosis appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

The Supreme Court on June 22, 2026, reinstated the murder conviction of Pedro Hernandez in the 1979 disappearance and killing of 6-year-old Etan Patz. The vote was 6-3. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson would have denied New York’s petition. The unsigned per curiam opinion reversed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which had ordered habeas relief and reopened the path to releasing Hernandez. A New York jury convicted him. A federal appeals court tried to undo that. The high court just put the verdict back where it belongs. BREAKING: The Supreme Court has reinstated the murder conviction of Pedro Hernandez for the 1979 slaying of missing New York City 6-year-old Etan Patz — Fox News (@FoxNews) June 22, 2026 Etan Patz vanished on May 25, 1979, after leaving his lower Manhattan apartment to take a bus to school. It was the first day he was allowed to walk to the bus stop alone. Hernandez was 18 and working at a bodega near that stop. The boy was never seen alive again. The case went cold for decades. It was revived in 2012 after Hernandez’s brother-in-law reported statements Hernandez had made, with a tip pointing to a confession in a prayer group. Hernandez confessed after questioning in New Jersey, then gave additional post-Miranda and videotaped confessions, according to the Court’s opinion. His first trial ended in a hung jury. The second jury convicted him of kidnapping and felony murder, and he was sentenced to 25 years to life. The legal fight that reached the Supreme Court came down to a single jury question and how the trial judge answered it. The Supreme Court opinion explains the chain of events in plain terms. During deliberations, jurors asked whether they had to disregard Hernandez’s later confessions if they found his initial pre-Miranda confession was not voluntary, and the trial judge answered no. The Second Circuit seized on that answer. It pointed to Missouri v. Seibert and concluded the trial judge had mishandled how jurors should weigh the confessions, then ordered habeas relief on that basis. The justices rejected that reasoning. They held that Seibert did not clearly establish any jury-instruction rule, and that the federal habeas statute known as AEDPA sharply limits when federal courts can disturb a state conviction after state judges already reviewed it on appeal. Under AEDPA, a federal court cannot grant relief unless the state ruling violated clearly established federal law. There was no such clearly established rule here, so the Second Circuit had no business reweighing the confession evidence to upset what a state jury decided after a full trial. The Court said the Second Circuit exceeded its authority, reversed, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. That is the key legal move. The Supreme Court did not retry the crime; it said the federal appeals court had stepped outside the narrow role Congress gave habeas courts. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg welcomed the ruling. “Today the Supreme Court agreed with the findings of multiple lower courts and upheld the trial conviction of Pedro Hernandez for the horrific murder of Etan Patz, which changed a generation of New Yorkers.” – D.A. Bragg. Watch here to learn more. pic.twitter.com/2K94vZiA6w — Alvin Bragg (@ManhattanDA) June 22, 2026 The New York Post reported that the unsigned opinion reversed the appeals court decision that had thrown out the 2017 conviction over jury-instruction issues. The Post noted Hernandez was a former bodega clerk and that Etan vanished from a SoHo street on the first day he was allowed to walk to his bus stop alone. It recounted the cold case being cracked open by the 2012 tip about a confession in a prayer group, and quoted Bragg saying the Court upheld the trial conviction for a horrific murder that changed a generation of New Yorkers. That local history matters because this was never a routine legal file. It was one of the cases that changed how parents, police, prosecutors, and the public thought about missing children. Prosecutors had been preparing for a third trial before the ruling came down. According to AP, the justices granted New York’s appeal by a 6-3 vote, and prosecutors had been getting ready to try Hernandez a third time. Hernandez has been serving 25 years to life. AP reported that Bragg said he hoped the Patz family gained some peace of mind, while Hernandez’s lawyers said they were terribly disappointed and continued to argue an innocent man is in jail. AP also noted Etan was among the first missing children to appear on milk cartons, and that the anniversary of his disappearance became National Missing Children’s Day. That is the national shadow behind the ruling: a child vanished, a generation remembered his face, and a conviction that took decades to secure nearly got forced back into a third trial. The Supreme Court reversed a federal appeals court judgment on Monday that enabled the release of Pedro Hernandez, who was convicted of the infamous 1979 murder of 6-year-old Etan Patz in New York. @Megwiththenews https://t.co/YmfMg1ph6U — Courthouse News (@CourthouseNews) June 22, 2026 The bottom line is straightforward. A jury heard the evidence and the confessions, convicted Hernandez, and the Supreme Court refused to let a federal appeals panel rewrite that result on a rule the law never required. For the family that turned a missing boy’s face into a national cause, the verdict stands. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post BREAKING: SCOTUS Issues 6-3 Ruling Overturning Key Verdict appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Keir Starmer is finished as British prime minister. On Monday, June 22, 2026, the Labour leader stood outside Downing Street and announced he will resign as prime minister and Labour Party leader. He said his own parliamentary party had answered the question of whether he was the right person to lead Labour into the next general election. He accepted the answer. That is Westminster language for the party pushing him toward the door. Sir Keir Starmer says he will resign as prime minister as he makes a statement in Downing Street, setting out a timetable for his departure and a Labour leadership contest. Latest: https://t.co/ezbhdclVnc pic.twitter.com/1s7ZE9Q0J6 — Sky News (@SkyNews) June 22, 2026 GOV.UK still lists Starmer as the prime minister who took office on July 5, 2024, after Labour’s landslide victory, and as the Labour leader elected in April 2020. The same official profile says he had been MP for Holborn and St Pancras since 2015 and came into politics after a long legal career. It highlights the résumé he brought to Downing Street: barrister, Queen’s Counsel, Director of Public Prosecutions, and a knighthood for services to criminal justice. That was the brand Starmer sold to Britain: competence, control, technocratic seriousness, and grown-up management after years of Conservative chaos. Voters were promised stability, not another short-lived premier forced into caretaker mode after political failure and broken confidence. Less than two years later, that brand is gone. Axios reported that Starmer resigned after weeks of turmoil and left Britain heading toward its seventh leader in a decade, an astonishing marker of national political instability. The report laid out the scale of Labour’s election collapse: the party lost control of Wales’ Parliament, recorded its worst-ever Scottish results, and dropped more than 1,200 council seats in England. That is a national warning flare. Axios also tied the anger to policy U-turns and the Peter Mandelson controversy, including the backlash over Starmer’s decision to move forward with Mandelson’s U.S. ambassador appointment despite known reputational problems. The same report said Starmer will stay as caretaker while Labour chooses a successor by the opening of Parliament in September, with Andy Burnham emerging as the leading contender during an economic crisis tied to the Iran war. BREAKING: UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announcing his resignation from office less than two years after leading the Labour Party to a landslide election victory. The announcement comes after months of internal unrest and a crushing round of recent local election losses for… pic.twitter.com/Tl8eBTkYJw — Fox News (@FoxNews) June 22, 2026 The supplied conservative seed from PatriotFetch framed Starmer’s resignation as the obvious breaking point after months of internal party dissatisfaction, public frustration, and failed leadership. It connected the resignation to Labour’s local-election beating, the Mandelson appointment controversy, and polling showing that a majority of Britons believed Starmer should resign. It also put Andy Burnham at the center of the transition story, describing him as the figure around whom Labour’s leadership conversation is now forming as nominations and succession planning begin. The broader point is hard to miss: the left got its majority, got its mandate, got its chance, and still ended up with a prime minister being managed out before he could even finish two years. That is disgrace, dressed up as an orderly transition. Sky News described the resignation day as the moment months of Labour tension finally broke, with Starmer delivering an emotional statement outside No. 10. Sky reported that Burnham had already been sworn in as an MP and that Wes Streeting was backing him, leaving Burnham looking like the likely successor. The live coverage also said ministers were facing uncertainty, a summit with the European Union had been cancelled, and the government was drifting into a holding pattern while Labour sorted out its leadership. The machinery of government looked stalled while the party fought over succession behind closed doors. Sky also carried President Trump’s reaction, reporting that he said Starmer had hurt himself badly on energy and immigration. Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer says he will resign, with a new leader to be in place by the time parliament returns in September, paving the way for Britain to have its seventh leader in 10 years. Live updates here: https://t.co/RQhRo6r4DP pic.twitter.com/kOLkkClIYm — Reuters (@Reuters) June 22, 2026 Starmer will remain in office for now as caretaker prime minister. Labour can call that stability if it wants. The public can see the truth: the man sold as the antidote to instability became another collapsed premier in a country that keeps burning through leaders. He won big. He governed badly. Then his own side decided he was too politically damaged to lead them into the next election. A normal transition happens when a leader completes the mission and hands off power. This is a liberal leader resigning in disgrace. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Liberal Leader Resigns In Disgrace. appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

This is wild… Immigration authorities have just arrested an illegal immigrant who was employed as a teacher in Chicago, IL. Giovanna Mercedes Moreno Occhipinti, originally from Venezuela, is accused of assisting in a Tren de Aragua gang-related mass shooting at a house party in Chicago last year. Three people were killed in the shooting. This illegal alien was arrested by Chicago police right after the shooting, but she was released under the city’s sanctuary policies at the time. That all changed under President Trump’s watch! The DHS shared a clip from Fox News in their announcement of Occhipinti‘s arrest on X: .@ICEgov ARRESTED an illegal alien former teacher wanted for her involvement in a TDA MASS SHOOTING. Giovanna Mercedes Moreno Occhipinti, a former Illinois teacher and an illegal alien from Venezuela, assisted in a December 2024 Tren de Aragua MASS SHOOTING at a Chicago house… pic.twitter.com/couLnoijRT — Homeland Security (@DHSgov) June 22, 2026 .@ICEgov ARRESTED an illegal alien former teacher wanted for her involvement in a TDA MASS SHOOTING. Giovanna Mercedes Moreno Occhipinti, a former Illinois teacher and an illegal alien from Venezuela, assisted in a December 2024 Tren de Aragua MASS SHOOTING at a Chicago house party that left THREE dead. After being arrested by Chicago police, Illinois sanctuary politicians RELEASED HER from jail without notifying ICE. Under @POTUS Trump and @SecMullinDHS, we’ll continue doing the job that sanctuary politicians in Illinois refuse to do: putting AMERICANS first and removing these dangerous criminals from our communities. Giovanna Mercedes Moreno Occhipinti entered the U.S. in 2021 and overstayed her visa. It is unclear how she was able to get a job as a teacher, and Illinois officials refuse to release the name of the school. Fox News reported further: Giovanna Mercedes Moreno Occhipinti, 32, an illegal immigrant from Venezuela with dual citizenship in Italy, was taken into custody by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents on May 13, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said. Occhipinti entered the U.S. in October 2021 under the Visa Waiver Program and was supposed to leave by Jan. 2, 2022. She overstayed her visa, DHS said. On the night of the Dec. 2, 2024, shooting, she allegedly drove the two gunmen—Ricardo Granadillo Padilla and Edward Martinez Cermeno—to the scene of the crime, where five people were injured in addition to the three fatalities, authorities said. “Although Chicago police arrested this illegal alien shortly after the shooting, sanctuary politicians released her from jail without notifying ICE,” DHS Acting Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said in a statement. “Under President Trump and Secretary Mullin, DHS is doing the job that sanctuary politicians in Illinois refuse to do: putting the American people first and removing these dangerous criminals from our communities.” Martinez Cermeno was released from ICE custody in January 2025 after a federal judge determined that federal prosecutors failed to meet their burden of proof to keep him incarcerated while awaiting trial. Immediately after the shooting, authorities found multiple weapons in Occhipinti’s vehicle, DHS said. Authorities believe she helped Granadillo Padilla and Martinez Cermeno evade law enforcement after the attack. The Chicago Police Department arrested Occhipinti on Dec. 5, 2024, on charges of unlawful use of weapons and other weapons offenses. However, she was released without ICE ever being notified under Chicago’s sanctuary policies, which protect illegal immigrants from federal immigration authorities. The Cook County State’s Attorney’s office decided not to prosecute the suspects, DHS said, and Granadillo Padilla and Martinez Cermeno were eventually deported. Thankfully, the gunmen were deported. Now, it’s Occhipinti’s turn! Send them all back! What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post ICE Arrests Illinois Teacher In Connection With Tren de Aragua MASS SHOOTING appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) faces accusations of using campaign funds for several lavish expenditures, including Disneyland, Disney World, and the Super Bowl. “Sen. Ruben Gallego repeatedly used campaign cash to fund luxury outings with his wife and to care for his children since launching his campaign for Senate in 2023, including attending the Super Bowl using a joint campaign account with Eric Swalwell,” POLITICO reporter Irie Sentner writes. SCOOP: Sen. Ruben Gallego repeatedly used campaign cash to fund luxury outings with his wife and to care for his children since launching his campaign for Senate in 2023, including attending the Super Bowl using a joint campaign account with Eric Swalwell.https://t.co/Osq33JrHr5 — Irie Sentner (@iriesentner) June 21, 2026 More from The Daily Beast: The Arizona lawmaker used political action committee funds to pay for trips and more than $18,000 in child care since 2019, Politico reported Sunday. “He just spends his campaign account like it’s his personal slush fund,” one source told the outlet. “He’s using campaign cash to live a luxury lifestyle.” Members of Gallego’s inner circle have expressed concern over his spending on behalf of his wife and children under the guise of fundraising and campaign events, according to Politico—especially as he eyes a potential 2028 presidential bid. In February 2023, Gallego and the now-disgraced former U.S. Congressman Eric Swalwell established a joint committee to raise money. The committee spent $2,715 at The Henry, a luxury brunch restaurant in Phoenix, as well as $34,700 on Super Bowl tickets, according to Federal Election Commission records. “Let me clear the air on some of these stories swirling around. The FEC has stated that childcare may be reimbursed. There is a simple reason: we want Congress to look like America. Not just people without children, those with grown children, or those from wealthy backgrounds. It is no news that I am a father of 3 young children and have a blended family. In fact, I’m one of the few members of Congress with young children. And it is no secret that, as part of being a senator, I have to fundraise. It’s the nature of politics, and it is a topic of much debate. But nonetheless, it’s part of the job,” Gallego said. “Because I’m not a millionaire (I’m one of the least wealthy members of Congress), every month is a game of childcare, travel, and scheduling balancing. I’m not special—it’s what millions of Americans who don’t have the advantages of serving in Congress deal with every day. Most have it even harder than I do. And because of my schedule and the laws passed that allow for it, I will at times bring my wife and children with me to these retreats and fundraisers. Are these at nice venues? Yes, it’s where the donors are, and it’s part of campaigning. I know people have opinions on that, but that’s the nature of the campaign system we have in our country,” he continued. “So these pieces swirling around are accusing me of this: fundraising as all politicians do, but doing it as the father of children under 10. That’s it,” he added. Let me clear the air on some of these stories swirling around. The FEC has stated that childcare may be reimbursed. There is a simple reason: we want Congress to look like America. Not just people without children, those with grown children, or those from wealthy backgrounds. It… — Ruben Gallego (@RubenGallego) June 22, 2026 The National News Desk shared further: The first-term lawmaker has tapped his leadership PAC, a committee separate from his main campaign group, to fly to Miami and the Caribbean island of St. Barts, as well as for babysitting, according to The Daily Beast. The outlet reviewed campaign finance records for its story published earlier this month, which Politico referenced in a Sunday follow-up. Gallego reportedly tapped his “JUNTOS PAC,” created shortly after he was sworn in last year, for a February 2025 stay at a Miami Beach hotel. The four-night stay cost more than $9,000, according to The Daily Beast. The trip included a birthday celebration for the senator’s wife, Sydney Gallego, as well as several political events. A person familiar with the expenses told the outlet the extended weekend was primarily for partying. “The rules are not robust enough to really prevent office holders from essentially using their campaign funds or funds in their leadership PAC to pay for a trip of this kind,” said Saurav Ghosh, director of the Campaign Legal Center’s financial reform team. “At a common sense level, we can all agree that it probably looks unethical, probably a terrible look from an optics standpoint, but strictly as a legal matter, it’s very difficult to point to a situation like this and say that it’s a clear legal violation.” Gallego hasn’t returned The National News Desk’s request for comment and didn’t address the birthday celebration when reached by Politico. The senator’s team has generally described his trips, including the one to St. Barts, as fundraising-focused flings. He and Sydney flew to the island this past March to celebrate the birthday of her boss, Carlos Zaffirini, according to The Daily Beast. The consulting executive has reportedly donated thousands to Gallego and other political figures. Gallego pulled a couple thousands from “JUNTOS PAC” for the trip’s flights, The Daily Beast noted. The post Democrat Senator Accused Of Using Campaign Funds For Opulent Personal Expenses appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.