Sen. Ron Johnson came to Anthony Fauci’s Senate hearing with receipts in hand, and one question that went straight to the heart of the government’s COVID-era treatment decisions. Holding up a thick stack of studies, Johnson challenged Fauci over the claim that there had been no evidence supporting ivermectin. The Wisconsin Republican said the papers showed effectiveness in the 60 to 70 percent range and declared, “There’s all kind of evidence.” Johnson then asked Fauci to what extent he had been involved in “sabotaging hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin.” Fauci did not answer the substance of the question. He invoked his Fifth Amendment rights. Ron Johnson Holds Up A STACK of Studies Showing 60-70% Effectiveness of Ivermectin, Says Fauci COVERED IT UP “You said there was no evidence” “There’s ALL KIND of Evidence” “To what extent were you involved in sabotaging Hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin?” *Pleads the Fifth* — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 29, 2026 That exchange came during a full committee hearing titled Testimony of Anthony Fauci, held Wednesday morning by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. The official hearing notice listed Fauci, the former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, as the sole witness. The committee scheduled the session for 8:30 a.m. in Room SD-342 of the Dirksen Senate Office Building. Its official page identified Fauci by his former NIAID title and placed the disputed decisions before the full committee, not a subcommittee or informal forum. The distinction here is important. Johnson’s question accused Fauci of helping sabotage two early treatments, but the exchange itself does not prove that accusation. What the hearing does show is a senator confronting the former government’s most prominent COVID official with a stack of studies, putting the allegation directly to him, and receiving a Fifth Amendment invocation instead of an explanation. Johnson has been pressing this issue for years. In a 2021 letter to federal health officials, he and other lawmakers argued that agencies had ignored or discouraged discussion of early COVID treatments. The letter specifically asked why ivermectin had been prejudged while a National Institutes of Health trial was still underway and demanded records about how treatment guidance had been developed. The lawmakers said treatment decisions had consequences for patients and physicians and sought the evidence federal officials used when discouraging certain therapies. Their questions covered both the scientific basis for the public posture and the decision process behind it. That history is why Wednesday’s questioning carried more weight than a one-off hearing clash. Johnson was returning to a dispute he had raised in writing while the pandemic response was still unfolding: who evaluated the evidence, who shaped the public guidance, and whether officials gave potentially useful early-treatment research a fair hearing. The scientific record also deserves accurate treatment. A later Cochrane systematic review, updated in 2022, concluded that the included evidence showed no beneficial effect for outpatients and remained uncertain for hospitalized patients. That finding does not erase legitimate questions about how federal officials handled competing evidence in real time, but it does mean Johnson’s 60 to 70 percent figure should be understood as his characterization of the studies he displayed, not as a settled medical conclusion. The accountability fight did not end when the hearing adjourned. Hours later, Johnson announced that he had sent letters asking Fauci and former Food and Drug Administration officials to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews. He said subpoenas would follow if they refused. Here is Johnson’s same-day follow-up: I just sent letters to former FDA officials and Anthony Fauci to appear voluntarily for transcribed interviews. The American people deserve answers, and I will issue subpoenas if they do not appear voluntarily. — Senator Ron Johnson (@SenRonJohnson) July 29, 2026 That next step matters because a hearing clip can expose the question, but documents and sworn interviews can establish the timeline. If officials acted properly, they should be able to explain who reviewed the studies, what standards were applied, and why federal guidance took the shape it did. If internal communications tell a different story, Congress should make them public. Americans lived through mandates, lockdowns, business closures, school disruptions, and relentless instructions to trust the experts. They are entitled to know whether those experts evaluated disfavored treatments honestly or allowed politics, institutional pressure, or bureaucratic self-protection to influence the response. Johnson put the allegation on the record. Fauci chose the Fifth. The subpoenas, interviews, and documents now have to provide the answers the hearing did not. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Ron Johnson Confronts Fauci With Ivermectin Studies, Fauci Takes the Fifth appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

President Trump appears to have pulled off the kind of Washington turnaround that almost never gets a splashy headline. A federal agency that spent years relying on taxpayer appropriations is now on course to pay its own way again — and send money back to the U.S. Treasury. The agency is the Export-Import Bank of the United States, better known as EXIM. A new report circulating Wednesday night said the bank has become profitable for the first time in nearly a decade. IT’S OFFICIAL: President Trump has just turned the US Export-Import Bank PROFITABLE for the FIRST TIME in nearly a decade The “EXPERTS” are in shambles! This is what happens when a businessman runs your country. pic.twitter.com/ODNGFjqhVv — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 30, 2026 The viral description is easy to understand. The official government language is a little different. Washington calls it self-financing status. That means the fees and interest EXIM collects from its customers cover its administrative and program costs, with excess collections recorded as “negative subsidy receipts” and returned to Treasury. Call it self-financing. Call it a negative subsidy. Call it profit. The bottom line is the same: the agency is projected to take in more than it needs to operate. And the timing of this turnaround matters. The EXIM 2025 Annual Report shows exactly where the bank stood before the current fiscal year. It covers the completed year that ended September 30, 2025, rather than a forecast or a midyear political estimate. In fiscal 2025, EXIM had authority to spend $125 million on administrative costs. Its credit-program collections paid back $76.9 million of that amount, but Congress still covered the remaining $48.1 million through an appropriation. The bank also reported $65.9 million in net cost from operations for the year. Its programs produced $90.6 million more in earned revenue than program costs before administrative expenses were added. In plain English, EXIM was generating substantial revenue, but it had not yet reached the point where it could fully carry itself. It still needed appropriated dollars to close the administrative gap. The completed-year report also shows why the bank was close enough to make a turnaround credible. EXIM authorized $8.7 billion in financing tied to an estimated $10.1 billion in American export sales during the year. The bank maintained $34.8 billion in worldwide exposure, while its reported default rate remained at 1.023 percent — roughly half the 2 percent statutory ceiling. That combination matters. More fees and interest mean little if defaults are quietly eating through the portfolio. EXIM’s books showed growing activity, a manageable reported default rate and a remaining administrative gap that the next fiscal year could realistically close. That is the line the bank is now expected to cross. EXIM’s latest agency performance plan marks self-financing status “Yes” for the new target period and lists $297.9 million in negative subsidy receipts. Those receipts are collections above the amount needed for expected losses, not a request for fresh taxpayer funding. That would be a dramatic reversal from the completed 2025 fiscal year. The bank would move from needing a $48.1 million administrative appropriation to generating a substantial excess under the government’s own budget rules. The performance plan places that financial target inside a wider overhaul of the agency. It treats financial discipline as an operating goal alongside faster decisions, modernized systems and a workforce aligned with strategic industries. EXIM says it is streamlining its organization, modernizing internal systems, speeding up transaction decisions and tightening the link between staffing and mission priorities. The plan also calls for clean audits and on-time reports to Congress so the financial result can be measured rather than merely advertised. Those details are important because self-financing cannot be sustained by one unusually large fee payment or a lucky reserve adjustment. The agency is promising to build the operating discipline needed to keep the revenue line above the cost line year after year. The earlier budget laid out how the math was supposed to work. EXIM’s fiscal 2026 budget justification projected $323.6 million in total revenue from offsetting collections and negative subsidy receipts. That revenue comes from fees and interest charged to users of EXIM’s loans, guarantees and insurance products. Against that, the bank projected $140 million in administrative and program expenses. The operating side included $125 million for administration and $15 million for program-budget costs. The remaining $183.6 million was shown as money available to go back to Treasury. That figure represented the budget’s projected excess after expenses, not the total amount collected from borrowers and customers. Those figures differ from a private company’s quarterly earnings statement. EXIM is a government corporation operating under federal credit rules, and its accounting includes loan-loss reserves, subsidy estimates, appropriations and Treasury transfers. But the direction is unmistakable. The budget projected that customer-generated receipts would cover both the risk built into the credit programs and the cost of running the agency. The bank expected its own revenue to cover its expenses and leave a nine-figure surplus for taxpayers. EXIM has done this before. The agency was self-financing for years before a long period of disruption damaged its ability to generate enough business. EXIM lost its full board quorum in 2015, which prevented it from approving transactions worth more than $10 million. That restriction remained until the board was restored in 2019. Even after the bank became fully operational again, rebuilding the deal pipeline took time. That history is why “first time in nearly a decade” is such a significant claim. The bank needed far more than a few expense cuts. It had to recover from years in which its ability to approve major transactions was severely limited. President Trump inherited the final stretch of that rebuild and put his administration’s own priorities on top of it. Under Chairman John Jovanovic, EXIM has focused heavily on critical minerals, energy, advanced manufacturing, artificial intelligence, nuclear technology and supply-chain security. A July 17 EXIM release described the bank as a tool for rebuilding the American industrial base and reducing reliance on foreign-controlled supply chains. Chairman John Jovanovic presented that case at the Pennsylvania Defense and Innovation Summit on July 15. That is a much more aggressive mission than helping a few companies close overseas sales. EXIM now frames supply-chain strength as part of both economic security and national security. The Trump administration is treating export finance as part of a broader economic-security strategy. The agency is targeting critical minerals, energy production and domestic manufacturing capacity where foreign dependence can become a strategic weakness. Jovanovic laid out that strategy alongside leaders from Blackstone, Palantir and Lockheed Martin. He argued that American innovators need financing and faster permitting if they are going to turn plans into factories, mines and production capacity. EXIM’s financing tools are meant to help American companies build projects that private lenders will not fully support or compete against foreign companies backed by their own governments. Jovanovic also pointed to permitting as a choke point, saying roughly $1.5 trillion in American projects were waiting on the sidelines. That is the administration’s larger bet: a self-financing EXIM can help unlock industrial projects without becoming another permanent drain on taxpayers. And the volume has already moved sharply higher. EXIM authorized more than 1,300 transactions totaling $8.7 billion in fiscal 2025, according to its annual report. Those transactions supported an estimated $10.1 billion in U.S. export sales. Nearly 88 percent of the transactions directly benefited small-business exporters, even though the largest dollar commitments naturally tend to involve major industrial projects. The bank also reported a default rate of 1.023 percent as of September 30, 2025 — well below its statutory 2 percent ceiling. Since the modern federal credit rules took effect in 1992, EXIM says it has sent a net $9.8 billion to the Treasury. That long-term record does not erase every legitimate debate about the bank. Critics have long argued that federal credit accounting understates the real cost of market risk and gives politically favored exporters an advantage unavailable to their competitors. The Congressional Budget Office 2026 federal-credit analysis helps explain the divide. CBO examined 66 commercial loan programs across the government using both the Federal Credit Reform Act method and a fair-value approach. Under the Federal Credit Reform Act method used in the budget, EXIM’s long-term guarantees are among the programs producing most of the projected savings from commercial federal credit programs. Twenty-nine of the 66 programs had a zero or negative subsidy rate under that method. Under fair-value accounting, which assigns a price to market risk, the estimated cost of federal credit programs is higher. That method asks what a private lender would charge to bear risks that become especially painful during a weak economy. That distinction is worth keeping in view. “Profitable” depends partly on which accounting framework is being used, even when the same expected borrower payments and defaults sit underneath both calculations. Together, those programs were projected to save the government about $900 million, with EXIM’s long-term guarantees among the largest contributors to those savings. The accounting debate does not erase the cash EXIM collects or the money it sends to Treasury. It does explain why serious analysts can look at the same federal loan portfolio and disagree over whether “profit” captures the full economic cost. Still, the turnaround inside the government’s legally required budget framework is real and meaningful. EXIM went from needing $48.1 million in appropriated administrative funding in fiscal 2025 to targeting full self-financing status and a major Treasury return in fiscal 2026. One final number still has to be certified. Fiscal 2026 does not end until September 30. That means the final audited financial statements will arrive after the books close, and the exact Treasury transfer may differ from the current target. But the bank’s own performance plan is no longer asking whether self-financing can happen someday. It is marking that objective “Yes.” For an agency that spent most of the last decade trying to get back to that point, that is a serious win. And for President Trump, it is another example of a Washington institution being judged by a standard the private sector understands perfectly well: Does it produce more value than it costs? This time, the answer appears to be yes. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post President Trump Just Turned One Long-Troubled Federal Agency Into a Money-Maker appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Elon Musk is getting ready to reenter the political arena in a very big way. And this time, the target is not the White House. It is control of Congress. Musk is reportedly reviving America PAC for a major 2026 midterm voter-turnout push designed to help Republicans protect President Trump’s majorities in the House and Senate. The plan puts one of the most powerful outside forces from the 2024 election back on the field just as the midterm fight enters its decisive stretch. Here is the breaking report that set off the reaction Wednesday evening: BREAKING: Elon Musk is launching a MASSIVE INVESTMENT into the midterms to help keep President Trump's majority in Congress through his America PAC — Axios The surge will include door-knocking, digital ads and mail to juice turnout. THANK YOU, ELON, for ALWAYS being Team… pic.twitter.com/HkcAUUAYXA — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 29, 2026 Axios reports that Musk is preparing a huge investment in the turnout operation, although his representatives did not disclose a specific dollar figure. The amount is expected to be substantial after Musk poured hundreds of millions of dollars into the presidential contest two years ago. The strategy is much broader than buying a wave of television commercials. America PAC is expected to concentrate on door-knocking, digital advertising, and direct mail aimed at conservative voters—especially those who are less likely to cast a ballot when a presidential race is not on the ticket. People familiar with the plans said the group will coordinate with other organizations in the Republican coalition rather than duplicate the same work. That division of labor would leave other GOP groups with more room to buy television advertising while America PAC concentrates on finding and turning out conservative voters. Musk’s political adviser Chris Young is expected to lead the effort. Musk himself has been in talks with President Trump’s team about where his money and political operation can make the greatest difference. That distinction matters. Midterm elections often turn on which side can get its own less-reliable supporters to show up. America PAC is built for exactly that kind of fight. The organization says it knocked on more than 10 million doors across over half a dozen swing states during the 2024 campaign. Its return would allow other Republican groups to focus more of their money on television while Musk’s operation handles the ground game. James Blair, President Trump’s senior political adviser, called America PAC an essential part of the historic 2024 get-out-the-vote effort and said its return is a major boost for Republicans across the country. Blair told Axios the Republican operation intends to outsmart its opponents and execute aggressively between now and Election Day. America PAC spokesman Andrew Romeo sounded just as confident. He said President Trump’s political team and the wider Republican organization have built a first-rate operation capable of bucking the usual midterm pattern and holding Congress this fall. That is a serious statement because the party controlling the White House usually faces strong headwinds in the first midterm election of a presidential term. Republicans are also defending extremely narrow margins. A relatively small turnout shift in a handful of competitive districts could determine control of the House. The Senate map offers Republicans more room, but it is not immune from the same forces. Axios reports that Republican super PACs and party committees currently hold a cash advantage of more than $300 million over their Democratic counterparts. That figure does not include roughly $400 million held by President Trump’s MAGA Inc. super PAC. A cash advantage matters most when it is tied to a disciplined field operation that can turn lists, voter data, and enthusiasm into actual ballots. That was the point of America PAC in 2024. The Associated Press reported after that election that Musk’s super PAC spent around $200 million to help elect President Trump, with Musk providing the vast majority of the money. The effort focused heavily on low-propensity and first-time voters in the seven most competitive battleground states. America PAC’s canvassing operation worked across the seven major battlegrounds. The group became one of the most consequential outside organizations in President Trump’s campaign because it took responsibility for reaching voters who rarely participated in federal elections. Musk provided most of the financing and also used X to promote the effort. The combination gave him both a field organization and a direct communications channel with tens of millions of voters. Musk said on election night that America PAC would keep operating, prepare for the midterms and intermediate elections, and even look at district attorney and judicial races. There were real questions about whether that promise would survive the political rupture that followed. Musk spent several months leading the Department of Government Efficiency before clashing publicly with President Trump over spending in the administration’s signature legislative package. At the peak of that fight, Musk floated creating a third party that could challenge the Republican establishment. That threat never became a functioning national political machine. By late 2025, Musk was moving back toward the GOP. A separate Axios report in December said he had resumed funding Republican House and Senate efforts, a clear sign that the relationship with President Trump and the party was beginning to thaw. The earlier report described Musk writing large checks for Republican congressional campaigns after months of open hostility with President Trump, giving both House and Senate efforts new financial support. It also showed that the billionaire’s third-party threat had given way to a practical decision: help Republicans hold the House and Senate rather than divide the conservative vote. By then, people close to both men were pointing to a warmer relationship. Musk’s renewed donations were the clearest evidence that the reconciliation was moving beyond friendly words. Wednesday’s news takes that return much further. The checkbook is being paired with the same turnout organization that Musk spent years building. Musk has reportedly been in private talks with President Trump’s team about where he can help most. His top political adviser, Chris Young, is expected to lead the America PAC effort. The reaction across conservative media was immediate: MASSIVE: Elon Musk is RESURRECTING his America PAC for the 2026 midterms to help President Trump KEEP HOLD of the Senate and the House. The strategy centers on door-knocking, digital ads, and direct mail designed to turnout the conservative base — especially voters who… pic.twitter.com/DwCR4wWk8y — RedWave Press (@RedWavePress) July 29, 2026 A billionaire’s check is only the opening move here. It is the return of an organization that already has voter data, field experience, national name recognition, and a record of operating at enormous scale. America PAC also gives Musk something ordinary political donors do not have: his own turnout vehicle. He can fund someone else’s television ad or campaign committee. He can also deploy an independent organization built around finding conservative voters and getting them to the polls. That makes the timing especially important. President Trump’s agenda for the final two years of this Congress depends on keeping Republican control. If Democrats capture even one chamber, investigations, subpoenas, spending battles, judicial confirmations, and every major legislative fight would change overnight. A Democratic House could grind the administration’s domestic agenda to a halt. A lost Senate would create a different crisis, threatening the confirmation pipeline for judges and executive-branch nominees. Musk appears to understand the stakes. The exact size of his new investment remains unknown, and America PAC has not disclosed which races it will target first. Those choices will determine where the operation can have its greatest impact. The larger decision is already clear: Musk is entering the midterm fight, and America PAC is coming back with him. The machine that helped President Trump win in 2024 is coming back. Now it will try to help him keep Congress in 2026. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Elon Musk Is About To Make One Massive Move To Help President Trump Keep Congress appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

I wanted to give readers of The Confessor something more than a standard book page. So we opened Detective Logan Hollister’s case file. The result is a free six-page field dossier that drops you directly into the investigation without spoiling the ending. What is inside the file? The dossier begins with the known facts: a string of victims, a handwritten confession at every scene, and crimes the victims believed were buried. From there, it gets more interesting. You will find the killer’s known signature, a theory board, Logan Hollister’s field profile, evidence notes, and a set of spoiler-safe questions designed to help you test your own theory as the case unfolds. Some evidence tells us exactly what happened. Other evidence raises a much darker question: who gets to decide when the truth becomes a death sentence? The Case File is arriving just before another major reader event: 100 Kindle copies of The Confessor will be available through the August Goodreads giveaway. The confessions are real. The victims have nothing in common. Detective Logan Hollister is running out of time to find the connection. The Confessor Goodreads giveaway opens August 1—100 Kindle copies:https://x.com/RealIsaacKnows/status/2082520623335481766 — Isaac Knows (@RealIsaacKnows) July 29, 2026 Open the free Logan Hollister Case File here. No spoilers. Just the investigation. I was careful not to turn this into a summary of the book. The whole point is to make the reading experience more immersive, not to give away the answers. You can print the file, keep notes while you read, build your own suspect theory, or use the discussion questions with a friend or book club. And if you have not started the novel yet, the dossier works as a spoiler-free introduction to Logan Hollister’s first case. The confession is only the beginning. In The Confessor, the killer never hides the victim’s crime. That is what makes the case so dangerous. Every body arrives with a confession. Every confession appears to be real. Before long, Los Angeles is no longer asking only who the killer is. The city is asking whether the victims deserved what happened to them. Logan Hollister has to find the line connecting the dead before the killer turns public outrage into permission. Get The Confessor in Kindle, paperback, or hardcover here. Kindle Unlimited readers can also read the novel through their subscription. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases. Take the file with you. The complete printable dossier is free. No purchase is required, and it contains no ending spoilers. Download the six-page Case File PDF. Then step into Logan Hollister’s Los Angeles and decide for yourself: if a confession is true, does that make the killing justice? This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post We Just Opened Detective Logan Hollister’s Case File—Here’s What’s Inside appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

This January, President Trump posted a threat on Truth Social — in all capital letters: “I will institute the INSURRECTION ACT.” While most people laughed it off… or scrolled to the next post… One former White House advisor took immediate steps to prepare. Jim Rickards is no stranger to Washington DC. He’s spent 40 years advising four U.S. Presidents, the CIA, and the Pentagon — and he believes Trump’s post was a “warning shot” far too many people ignored. In a recent presentation, he laid out his entire theory… which now appears to be coming true. He told us, “Trump is preparing to invoke a power used a handful of times since 1807.” When it happens, Rickards says, the panic won’t stop in DC. Within hours, it could spread to the rest of the country… and the financial markets. For the full story, be sure to watch his briefing, free of charge. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!) This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Fmr. White House Advisor: Trump’s ALL-CAPS Warning Wasn’t a Bluff appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.