President Trump’s Justice Department has gone to the Supreme Court with a question lower courts keep turning into a release valve. Can a federal judge order illegal migrants released on bond while their deportation cases play out, or did Congress already say they stay in custody? The administration says Congress already answered that. Now it wants the high court to say so too. The case is Raycraft v. Lopez-Campos, docket number 25-1415. According to the official Supreme Court docket, the petition for a writ of certiorari was filed June 22, 2026, and the case was docketed June 24. The docket identifies the lower court as the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, with several consolidated case numbers underneath it from the same detention fight. It also lists Solicitor General D. John Sauer as counsel of record for the federal parties, which tells you the administration is treating this as a serious national enforcement question. The response deadline sits on the docket too, so this is now formally in front of the Court as an immigration-enforcement case with real national reach for ICE custody policy. The justices have yet to take final action. The Trump administration is asking them to take the case and wipe away a lower-court result that keeps pushing bond hearings into mandatory detention. Here is what the fight is really about. Breitbart reported that the Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to block migrant releases before deportation. The report frames the case as a direct challenge to release-before-removal pressure. The dispute centers on people who entered the country unlawfully and were later arrested inside the United States by ICE. They then sought bond hearings while removal cases continued in immigration court after arrest. The administration’s position is that federal law places those migrants into mandatory detention, meaning custody continues while the government works through the removal process instead of restarting release fights before deportation. The opposing theory would let judges create a path back onto the street before the deportation case is finished, which turns detention into another round of catch-and-release pressure nationwide. That is why the filing matters beyond one group of plaintiffs: the same legal theory can shape how ICE handles interior arrests across the country. The national wire framing put the core legal question this way: Trump administration asks US Supreme Court to endorse immigration detention policy https://t.co/0zS4xCYVD0 — Reuters (@Reuters) June 26, 2026 The Guardian carried Reuters reporting on the case and added broader context about who is affected by the detention policy. The report said the administration is asking the Supreme Court to endorse detention for people arrested in President Trump’s immigration crackdown, even when arrests occur years after entry. It also noted that some of the migrants involved may have lived in the United States for years before being arrested, which is exactly the kind of fact the left uses to argue for release later. The administration’s answer is very different: years inside the country after unlawful entry should strengthen the case for interior enforcement, because that is why interior enforcement exists in the first place. That is the practical divide: one side treats long-term unlawful presence as a reason for bond, while the Trump administration treats it as a reason to enforce the law. The legal path runs through the Sixth Circuit. The Sixth Circuit case file shows a consolidated immigration-detention fight involving multiple case numbers from the lower-court path. Behind the technical language is a practical fight over bond hearings, removal proceedings, and how much power lower courts have to interrupt mandatory detention after an interior ICE arrest inside the country. One reading keeps people in custody while the government works to remove them. The other gives judges another mechanism to move migrants out of detention while the case continues through immigration court. That is why this petition matters far beyond one docket number. It cuts straight into whether President Trump’s enforcement machine can actually keep custody of the people it arrests after interior operations begin. If the lower-court path holds, the argument can become a template for more release demands in other detention fights. Another national report framed the administration’s request this way: Trump administration asks Supreme Court to OK its unprecedented immigration detention policy https://t.co/VcSwgYq6Dg — POLITICO (@politico) June 26, 2026 Notice the word choice there: “unprecedented.” The bigger break from normal was the old system that let illegal entry, years of unlawful presence, and repeated legal process turn into release after release. President Trump campaigned on restoring consequences at the border and inside the country. This case is one more test of whether that promise survives contact with the lower courts. The justices have a clean choice in front of them if they take the case. Either mandatory detention means what Congress wrote, or judges keep forcing new openings in the system. One path restores consequences. The other keeps the revolving door spinning. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post President Trump’s DOJ Asks Supreme Court To Stop Judges From Releasing Illegal Migrants Before Deportation appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

The federal food-stamp program is no longer just a target for petty cheats lying on an application. It is now a hunting ground for organized, tech-savvy criminals, and some of the stolen money is reaching very dangerous people. That was the warning USDA Inspector General John Walk delivered to the House Oversight Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency on June 25. The hearing was titled “Combating Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in SNAP,” and the numbers Walk brought with him are hard to ignore. SNAP is the largest domestic food assistance program in the country. It served 41.7 million people in an average month during fiscal year 2024 at a federal cost north of $100 billion, with more than 250,000 authorized retailers able to accept the benefits. WATCH: Chairman @RepTimBurchett opens today's DOGE hearing on SNAP fraud. "$10 billion in SNAP benefits were improperly paid out by the States … Federal taxpayers deserve to know what Governor Newsom and his counterparts in other states are trying to hide—and at what cost." pic.twitter.com/zb6BaYqfwu — Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) June 25, 2026 Walk’s testimony, available through the House Oversight Committee, lays out how the threat has changed. The official hearing page shows the June 25 proceeding was held in Rayburn 2154 and lists Walk as the USDA Inspector General witness, alongside witnesses from the United Council on Welfare Fraud, Advancing American Freedom, and the Food Research and Action Center. He told lawmakers that perpetrators now include highly organized, sophisticated criminals stealing enormous sums through EBT card skimming, trafficking operations, identity fraud, terminal cloning, and corrupt retailers. The detail that should stop anyone reading is where some of the money ends up. Walk testified that proceeds of SNAP fraud have gone to individuals linked to terrorist groups, foreign adversary nations, and transnational criminal organizations. The mechanics are fast and cold. In his written testimony, Walk walked lawmakers through the major fraud lanes now hitting the program: EBT card skimming, SNAP trafficking, terminal cloning, identity fraud, and corrupt retail operations. He said a criminal can plant a skimmer on a payment terminal in as little as seven seconds, capture a beneficiary’s card data, clone the EBT card, and drain the account when monthly benefits load. That leaves the legitimate family standing at the grocery store with nothing left on the card, sometimes before they even know the card was compromised. He pointed to specific cases. Five Romanian nationals were indicted in a scheme to steal nearly $1 million in SNAP benefits from low-income families through skimming. A separate Louisiana investigation produced indictments against two more Romanian nationals for access device fraud, and Walk said both were confirmed members of transnational organized crime groups. Some of those groups, he testified, use the illicit proceeds to fund other crimes, potentially including terrorism. Then there was Operation “Mic Drop” in southern California, where more than $2 million was stolen from taxpayers. SNAP EBT benefits were swapped for cash, and the proceeds were spent on crack cocaine and guns. One terminal-cloning scheme alone caused a $66 million loss and involved a USDA employee who sold sensitive FNA numbers to co-conspirators. That employee was sentenced to two years in federal prison. USDA IG John Walk testified before House Subcommittee on Delivering on Government Efficiency “SNAP fraud is a reprehensible crime that squanders the compassion of American taxpayers who fund the program and robs from those low-income American who qualify for benefits to feed… pic.twitter.com/yedgYQIcdH — USDA OIG (@OIGUSDA) June 25, 2026 Walk did not arrive empty-handed on enforcement. He said USDA OIG investigations since February 2025 have produced nearly 1,000 arrests, 133 convictions, and more than $135 million in restitution, fines, and assessments tied to SNAP violations. But he was blunt about the limits of cleanup after the fact. The OIG cannot “pay and chase” its way out of this, he said, calling instead for stronger front-end controls, modern identity verification, better data sharing, and modern EBT security. Subcommittee Chairman Tim Burchett opened the hearing with his own figure, saying USDA officials identified roughly $3 billion in potential fraud and waste pulled from participating-state data. Fox News reported that the participating-state data showed benefits allegedly going to deceased individuals, applicants using fraudulent Social Security numbers, and duplicate recipients. The report also noted Burchett’s claim that USDA officials identified roughly $3 billion in potential fraud and waste from states that did cooperate with the data request, while more than 20 states declined to provide the requested SNAP data. Burchett tied the question directly to the states that run the program day to day, naming Governor Gavin Newsom of California and his counterparts and asking what they are trying to hide and at what cost. The enforcement side is moving fast right now, too. A three-day skimming outreach operation led by the Secret Service New York Field Office wrapped on June 26. The Secret Service reported that agents and partner agencies removed 35 illegal skimming devices during the operation. The scale is what makes the release worth paying attention to: 1,010 businesses visited, 3,935 inspections conducted, and an estimated $36.5 million saved before additional victims could be drained. That matters because Walk’s testimony described skimming as one of the fastest-growing ways criminals hit benefit cards. The pattern is not abstract: criminals plant devices on real payment terminals, collect card data, clone the card, and move when benefits load. The New York operation shows why the front-end controls Walk is asking for matter. Once the money is gone, the government is left chasing criminals while families are left trying to buy groceries with an empty card. Proud to be part of the United States Secret Service led effort in New York City this week • $36.5 Million tax dollars saved• 35 illegal skimming devices removed• 1,010 businesses visited• 3,935 inspections• Ongoing fraud against New Yorkers disrupted• Payday… pic.twitter.com/d4Gx7a6zhW — USDA OIG (@OIGUSDA) June 26, 2026 The picture from this hearing is consistent. Food-stamp dollars meant for hungry families are being skimmed, cloned, and laundered, and some of that money is reaching people who want to do this country harm. The watchdog says arrests alone will not fix it. The fix has to start at the front end, before the cards are loaded and the thieves are already seven seconds ahead. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE The post USDA Watchdog Tells Congress SNAP Fraud Cash Is Reaching Terror-Linked Actors appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

The Supreme Court is running out of calendar, and some of the most important cases of President Trump’s second term are still on the table. These are not small disputes. They go to the heart of who runs the executive branch and who decides who gets to be an American citizen. The left has spent the last year trying to bottle up Trump’s agenda in lower courts. The final stretch of this term puts the biggest questions right back where they belong. Reuters reported on June 28, 2026, that three major Trump-related rulings were still due as the term neared its end. The outlet named the three: Trump’s bid to limit birthright citizenship, and two fights over whether he can remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and Rebecca Kelly Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission. Reuters also reported that seven disputes overall remained unresolved, with the justices setting Monday, June 29, 2026, as the next opinion day. That timing is the story. The Court is closing the term with questions about citizenship, executive power, and the administrative state all crowded into the same final stretch, with the administration waiting to see how much room the justices will give the presidency. For Trump, those are not abstract legal fights. They determine whether elected presidential authority can survive the lower-court blockade that has followed almost every major move of his second term. The birthright case carries the Supreme Court docket name Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Barbara, et al. The Supreme Court docket shows the case was docketed September 29, 2025, and came out of the First Circuit. At issue is whether the administration can enforce Trump’s order limiting automatic citizenship for children born in the United States to parents who are here unlawfully or only temporarily. That is why the case matters beyond one order. It asks whether the old Beltway assumption about automatic citizenship is actually what the Constitution commands, or whether the political class converted a contested reading into permanent policy by repetition. For decades, the open-borders crowd treated that question as settled by slogan. Trump’s order forces the Court to deal with the constitutional argument directly before the country heads deeper into the midterm cycle. The other two cases go after a different target: the so-called independent agencies that act like they answer to no one. The Supreme Court docket for Trump, President of the United States v. Lisa D. Cook lists Cook as a member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, with the case coming up from the D.C. Circuit. That dispute sits squarely inside the broader presidential removal-power fight. The question is simple to state and huge in effect: can the president remove an official inside one of these agencies, or do they get to outlast the man the voters elected? The Cook case matters because the Federal Reserve is one of the most powerful institutions in Washington. If its officers can wall themselves off from presidential accountability, the voters lose one more lever over the people exercising national power. The Supreme Court docket for Trump, President of the United States, et al. v. Rebecca Kelly Slaughter raises the same theme at the Federal Trade Commission, also out of the D.C. Circuit. Slaughter is a Federal Trade Commission figure, and the case fits the same independent-agency removal fight as Cook. That makes the pair hard to separate. One case points at the Fed, the other at the FTC, and both ask whether the executive branch can keep acting like a museum exhibit after voters choose a new president to change direction. Put the Cook and Slaughter cases together and you have a direct test of whether a president can actually control his own branch of government. None of this is settled yet, and the term is not over. What is clear is that the final days of this Supreme Court term are stacked with Trump power cases, and the answers will shape what the next three years of his presidency look like. The post President Trump’s Biggest Power Cases Land in the Supreme Court’s Final Days appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

A major Central Asian nation just made a very public choice to deepen its ties with the United States under President Trump, and its leader did not hold back the praise. Kazakhstan President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev called Trump a great leader and statesman, and said he was sent by Heaven. That line ricocheted through Washington and Trump-world after the two leaders met face to face in the Oval Office. This is what winning foreign policy looks like. Countries lining up to do business with America instead of lecturing it. The White House documented the meeting between Trump and Tokayev in the Oval Office on November 6, 2025. The official gallery captured the two leaders sitting down together at the most powerful address in the world, with the Kazakhstan delegation and Trump’s team gathered around the Oval Office. That photo is the one anchoring this story, and it tells you where Kazakhstan wanted to be seen. Tokayev did not send a junior official to float a trial balloon through back channels. He came to Washington, sat across from Trump, and put the relationship in front of the cameras. For a country sitting in one of the most watched regions on earth, that is a deliberate signal. The New York Times published a June 28, 2026 report highlighting how Kazakhstan is deepening its U.S. ties and how Tokayev praised Trump as sent by Heaven. The important part is that this is now getting fresh attention outside conservative media. Even the legacy press is having to deal with a foreign leader publicly praising Trump’s dealmaking while his country moves closer to Washington. That is the part Democrats never know how to explain. They spend years telling Americans the world is laughing at Trump, and then a strategic country says the opposite out loud. The real substance is in Kazakhstan’s own official record, where the diplomacy is described in dollars, trade, and security terms. Akorda, the official website of Kazakhstan’s president, reported that Tokayev held talks with Trump at the White House during the Washington visit. The official account said Tokayev called Trump’s presidency historic and stressed that Kazakhstan sees the United States as a major partner with room to expand across trade, energy, investment, technology, and transportation. Trump reaffirmed the U.S. commitment to strengthening the Enhanced Strategic Partnership with Kazakhstan, the formal lane for deeper economic and strategic work between the two countries in a region Washington cannot afford to ignore. The two leaders welcomed commercial agreements worth more than $17 billion as part of the visit, moving the meeting past ceremony and into hard economic substance for both economies. That is jobs, energy, aviation, raw materials, and industry moving through the American side of the table. For FedUp readers, that is the real foreign-policy scoreboard. America is not begging for approval; other countries are coming to the Oval Office to make deals. The visit went beyond one Oval Office conversation. Tokayev sat down with the heavy hitters of Trump’s administration. Akorda reported that Tokayev met with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick, and U.S. Special Envoy Sergio Gor during the same Washington push. Tokayev emphasized opportunities to strengthen the strategic partnership through economic cooperation aimed at jobs, industry, entrepreneurship, investment, private-sector growth, and new business activity between the two countries. That lineup matters. Rubio handled the diplomatic lane, Lutnick represented the commerce lane, and Gor represented Trump’s special-envoy channel during a visit built around practical deliverables. Put them together and the visit looks much bigger than a courtesy call. It looks like an administration trying to turn strategic geography, supply chains, minerals, energy, and investment into American leverage and economic opportunity. Then came the part that really matters for peace in the region. Akorda reported that Kazakhstan intends to join the Abraham Accords, putting a major Central Asian nation into the Trump-era peace framework. The announcement came during a joint phone conversation between Tokayev, Trump, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, giving the move direct presidential and Israeli-government weight. Trump praised the decision as a major step forward in building bridges across the world, and the Kazakhstan account framed the decision as part of broader peace and cooperation between nations that do not always sit in the same diplomatic camp. He framed it as nations lining up for peace and prosperity through the Abraham Accords, which is exactly the kind of peace-through-strength diplomacy his critics said could never happen after Trump’s first-term breakthroughs. Kazakhstan is majority-Muslim, resource-rich, and strategically placed in Central Asia. Its decision to associate itself with the Abraham Accords gives the move weight well beyond a routine communique. It also links the U.S.-Kazakhstan story to Trump’s broader Middle East record, where the Accords remain one of the clearest examples of practical peace deals replacing stale diplomatic theater. The State Department has its own page titled “A New Era in U.S.-Kazakhstan Relations,” describing the partnership in economic and strategic terms. Add it all up and you see a clear picture. Trade, energy, critical minerals, peace diplomacy, and a foreign leader who calls the American president sent by Heaven. This is the difference between a president the world respects and one the world rolls. Other nations are choosing to deal with America because Trump makes the deal worth taking, and Kazakhstan just put that choice on the record. What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE The post Kazakhstan’s President Says President Trump Was Sent By Heaven appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

On Saturday, senile, cancer-ridden Joe Biden was dragged back onstage — this time, at a Democratic Party gala. And, the dude couldn’t catch a break. During his speech, protestors interrupted him, screaming out phrases like “Genocide Joe.” Watch this for yourself: Protesters screamed “Genocide Joe” through Joe Biden’s speech tonight. Why are Democrats still dragging him out like this. It’s just sad at this point. pic.twitter.com/pRk7SwAgWm — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) June 28, 2026 The rest of Biden’s speech didn’t go much better… He coughed, angrily shouted, and cursed his way through the speech while attempting to badmouth President Trump and call on Democrats to “get up and fight.” The New York Post shared more details on his speech: Biden, 83, relied on a teleprompter during his Saturday night remarks, squinting at times as he read his verbal blasts at his rival, who he defeated in 2020, only to relinquish the White House in 2024. He coughed loudly several times early on.“Have you noticed that Americans are saying the economy under the Biden administration is a hell of a lot better than under Trump?” he told party faithful in the deep blue state. “It’s not just his vanity projects – tearing down the East Wing of the White House making room for his ballroom. Putting his name on the Kennedy Center. Building an arch in his own honor. Even hiring his own pool guy to fix the reflecting pool. Woah – what a loser,” Biden said to applause. “Have you noticed that Americans are saying the economy under the Biden administration is a hell of a lot better than under Trump?” he told party faithful in the deep blue state. “It’s not just his vanity projects – tearing down the East Wing of the White House making room for his ballroom. Putting his name on the Kennedy Center. Building an arch in his own honor. Even hiring his own pool guy to fix the reflecting pool. Woah – what a loser,” Biden said to applause. The former president is battling Stage 4 prostate cancer. At the end of his speech, Biden struggled to find the exit and needed help figuring out how to get off the stage. Watch this compilation of the low-lights of Biden’s speech: HAPPENING NOW Joe Biden is speaking at the Maryland Democratic Party. He’s mumbling, coughing, yelling, cursing, and had to ask for instructions on how to exit the stage. He also called on Democrats to “fight.” So he’s pretty much in the same condition as the day he left… pic.twitter.com/4O8gfyuTXG — Breanna Morello (@BreannaMorello) June 28, 2026 HAPPENING NOW Joe Biden is speaking at the Maryland Democratic Party. He’s mumbling, coughing, yelling, cursing, and had to ask for instructions on how to exit the stage. He also called on Democrats to “fight.” So he’s pretty much in the same condition as the day he left the White House. What a disaster. You almost feel bad for the guy. Take a look at some of these responses: The mummy is still around? Didn’t he have “stage four cancer”? — CaptainUSATX (@CaptainUSATX) June 28, 2026 Why are they still putting him out there? Holy crap. — OutlanderinLV (@Trustno1fxm) June 28, 2026 He acts like he’s missed out on the tapioca pudding at the nursing home. — SteveHogan (@stephenshogan1) June 28, 2026 I guess Jill said they needed a paycheck… — M. Harley J. Roth Bulldogge (@HarleyBulldogge) June 28, 2026 Biden’s latest embarrassing public appearance comes just a week after he attended the opening of the (atrocious Obama presidential library, where he was forgotten on stage. We covered that here: HILARIOUS: Joe Biden Left Alone On Stage, Completely Lost /*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post WATCH: Protestors Scream at Joe Biden During Latest Public Speech appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.