The Texas GOP Senate runoff is turning into a rout. As polls closed Tuesday night, prediction markets gave President Trump-backed Attorney General Ken Paxton a 97% chance of defeating incumbent Sen. John Cornyn. Then the actual votes started coming in, and the numbers were even more brutal than expected. JUST IN: As polls close in Texas, Trump-backed Ken Paxton has a 97% chance of victory in the GOP Senate runoff. pic.twitter.com/GpeflumHF8 — Polymarket (@Polymarket) May 27, 2026 With 25% of the vote reporting, Paxton had opened up a staggering 22-point lead over the three-term senator. That margin kept growing as election-day vote drops rolled in. Ken Paxton lead keeps growing! Up 22 points with 25% reporting! https://t.co/rNYMdvVR7K pic.twitter.com/3ZxFUpNQmc — Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) May 27, 2026 One election-day batch showed Paxton pulling 87% of the vote, a jaw-dropping number that left even MSNBC’s Steve Kornacki stunned on air. Kornacki called it a “74-point margin” in that drop and noted it came with “full knowledge of the President Trump endorsement.” OMG. Ken Paxton just WON an election day vote drop in Texas with **87%** of the vote KORNACKI: "Oh my goodness! Election day, full knowledge of the Trump endorsement…WOW. A 74-point margin!" Time to BRING IT HOME! pic.twitter.com/T647M2X9vu — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 27, 2026 The writing was already on the wall before the first ballot was counted. Cornyn’s campaign confirmed the senator would not appear at his own watch party, choosing instead to monitor results “privately.” The room itself reportedly had only about 50 chairs. President Trump endorsed Paxton ahead of the runoff, turning the race into a direct test of his ability to remove Republican incumbents he views as insufficiently loyal to the America First agenda. AP laid out the political setup before election night: President Trump endorsed Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the GOP runoff for U.S. Senate, supercharging Paxton’s effort to oust Sen. John Cornyn. The endorsement arrived late in the race and immediately gave Paxton a major boost among Republican voters who see loyalty to President Trump as the defining issue. Cornyn entered the race with the power of incumbency and a massive spending advantage. His campaign and allied groups had spent roughly $90 million on advertising since last year, with much of the money aimed at attacking Paxton. But the race had become another test of whether old Senate Republicans can survive when President Trump chooses a challenger. Paxton’s side quickly turned the endorsement into campaign fuel, while Cornyn acknowledged the endorsement would matter but insisted Texas voters would decide the race. The timing was brutal for Cornyn because the President’s endorsement came as conservative voters were already questioning whether the longtime senator truly represented the MAGA base. Election night returns now suggest that argument landed hard. For Cornyn, it meant money could not erase the endorsement problem. It does not appear to have mattered. AP also explained why the runoff had national stakes beyond Texas: The runoff set up President Trump’s next opportunity to reshape the Republican Party by pushing out an incumbent he viewed as insufficiently loyal. Cornyn had criticized Trump before the 2024 campaign, and much of the primary fight centered on which candidate was more aligned with the President and his agenda. The geography mattered, too. Counties where President Trump had the strongest support were expected to help decide the outcome, especially if Paxton could turn the endorsement into a late surge among election-day voters. The winner of the Republican runoff will face Democratic state Rep. James Talarico in November. Democrats have been looking for any opening in Texas as they try to retake control of the U.S. Senate, but the GOP nominee will still begin the general election in one of the most important Republican states in the country. That is why tonight is bigger than one Senate race. It is another test of whether Republican primary voters are still rewarding President Trump’s picks over Washington incumbency. Early returns are answering that question loudly. In deep-red Texas, the Republican nominee is the heavy favorite in November. No major outlet had officially called the race at the time of this report, but with numbers like these, the math is running out fast for John Cornyn. The Trump endorsement appears to have broken the race open. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

A petition to ban most hunting, fishing, and animal research in Oregon has reached the amount of signatures necessary to make it onto the November ballot, supporters of the effort say. Hunting, Fishing Could Face Ban Under Controversial Petition In Blue State KATU has more: Supporters of an effort to criminalize the killing of animals for food in Oregon are one step closer in getting a measure on the November ballot. Initiative Petition 28 would make it illegal to injure or kill animals and would effectively ban hunting, fishing and the breeding of animals. "A proposal to make hunting and fishing illegal in Oregon has received enough signatures to advance to the Nov. ballot. The Sec. of State needs to validate all the signatures first," the outlet wrote. More below: A proposal to make hunting and fishing illegal in Oregon has received enough signatures to advance to the Nov. ballot. The Sec. of State needs to validate all the signatures first. A Portland City Council member wants to rename Cesar Chavez Blvd. Details: https://t.co/JUbTl3v7Dy pic.twitter.com/ogLTjSzdvQ — KATU News (@KATUNews) May 26, 2026 The proposed ballot initiative would categorize hunting, fishing, and trapping as forms of animal cruelty. The effort has gathered more than the required 117,000 signatures. However, it's doubtful that all the signatures will be verified. A controversial Oregon ballot initiative that would effectively criminalize hunting and fishing is one step closer to landing on the November ballot. However, a portion of those signatures will almost certainly be ruled ineligible, such as any from individuals who are not… — Families for Affordable Food (@protectourfarms) May 26, 2026 OregonLive explained further: The backers of Initiative Petition 28, which would expand Oregon’s animal cruelty laws, have now collected and submitted more than 120,000 signatures to the state — slightly above the roughly 117,000 signatures required to get the measure on the ballot. However, a portion of those signatures will almost certainly be ruled ineligible, such as any from individuals who are not registered voters. At least 15% of signatures were rejected from each of the four initiative petitions that have qualified for the ballot since 2022, state records show. Leaders of the campaign say it’s too early to know whether they will make the ballot, but they say they are hopeful. They have until July 2 to submit enough valid signatures. “I am grateful that we have been picking up speed the past few months,” David Michelson, leader of the campaign, said Tuesday. “I think that it is definitely possible that we could qualify, that we could turn in enough signatures, but we will be using every day before the deadline to collect signatures.” If approved by voters, the ballot initiative would remove many exemptions from Oregon animal cruelty laws that apply to various recreational and occupational activities. In practice, the measure would prohibit hunting, fishing, slaughtering livestock, conducting scientific research on animals, using animals in rodeos, operating a commercial poultry business and castrating or neutering livestock, among other activities. Read the full proposed initiative HERE.

The last major poll before Tuesday’s Texas Republican Senate runoff shows Ken Paxton with a clear lead over Sen. John Cornyn. The Quantus Insights survey, conducted May 21-23 among 1,018 likely GOP runoff voters, puts Paxton at 52.7% and Cornyn at 43.4%, with 3.9% still undecided. The effective sample size was 936, with a weighted margin of error of roughly 3.5 points. That nine-point gap is remarkable given where this race started. Cornyn narrowly finished first in the March primary by just 1.5 points, forcing the runoff in the first place. Something shifted the race, and the obvious factor is President Trump’s endorsement of Paxton. As Trending Politics noted, the Quantus survey found that awareness of President Trump’s endorsement was nearly universal among likely runoff voters. Most respondents said the endorsement did not change their vote. Among the voters it did move, the shift broke heavily in Paxton’s direction. Another election account posted the same exact Quantus topline from the final survey window: Quantus poll | 5/21-5/23 LV US Senate Texas Republican primary 2026 Ken Paxton 52.7%John Cornyn 43.4% (incumbent) — Politics & Poll Tracker (@PollTracker2024) May 25, 2026 That tracks with what you would expect in a Republican-only runoff where President Trump’s word still carries enormous weight. According to Quantus Insights, Paxton’s lead appeared consistent across multiple demographic and geographic cross-tabs within the likely voter universe. Cornyn, a three-term incumbent and former Senate Majority Whip, has been a fixture of the Texas GOP establishment for two decades. He bet that his seniority and institutional relationships would carry him through a runoff against Paxton, who served as Texas Attorney General before mounting this challenge. That bet is not looking strong heading into Tuesday. A poll is not an election result, and 3.9% of voters remain undecided with the margin of error at 3.5 points. Turnout in runoff elections is notoriously difficult to predict, and both campaigns will be working to get their voters to the polls on Tuesday. But the direction of the numbers is unmistakable. Texas Republicans are heading to the polls to answer a straightforward question: does this Senate seat stay with the old guard, or does it move further into President Trump’s America First lane? If the Quantus numbers are anywhere close to accurate, GOP primary voters have already made up their minds. 270toWin spotlighted the rounded topline as the race hit its final stretch: Texas Senate runoff poll conducted after Trump endorsement of Paxton just published by @QuantusInsights Paxton 53%, Cornyn 43%https://t.co/QVwbQnIztH — 270toWin (@270toWin) May 25, 2026 Trending Politics reported the final Quantus runoff numbers this way: Quantus Insights’ final survey of the Texas Republican Senate runoff showed Ken Paxton leading Sen. John Cornyn by nearly ten points. The reported topline had Paxton at 52.7% and Cornyn at 43.4%. Another 3.9% of likely GOP runoff voters were still undecided before the May 26 election. The survey was conducted May 21 through May 23 among 1,018 likely Republican runoff voters. Quantus used mobile-cell SMS outreach and a modeled Republican runoff electorate. The effective sample size was 936 voters. The weighted margin of error was listed at about plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. The poll marks a sharp turn from March, when Cornyn finished barely ahead of Paxton and forced the runoff. Paxton’s lead was reported across men, women, rural voters, suburban voters, voters without four-year college degrees, and most major media markets. Cornyn’s strongest pockets were urban voters and highly educated Republicans, but the memo said that was not enough to erase Paxton’s broader coalition. Quantus Insights framed its own survey release around Paxton holding the edge: Quantus titled the release as a survey showing Paxton holding the edge on the eve of the Texas GOP runoff. The firm’s page described President Trump’s endorsement as widely known among likely Republican runoff voters. It also said Paxton’s advantage rested on broader runoff alignment, not only on late endorsement movement. That distinction matters because most voters in the poll said the endorsement did not change their vote. Among voters who did say the endorsement moved them, the movement favored Paxton. Quantus describes its work as polling, election forecasting, economic analysis, and advanced modeling. The firm says it focuses on political and economic intelligence for elections and public policy. The survey was released just before Election Day, so it should be read as a final snapshot of the runoff electorate. It is not a declared result, but it gives Paxton a strong closing position if the modeled electorate matches Tuesday’s turnout. The Texas Tribune laid out the President Trump endorsement backdrop: President Trump endorsed Ken Paxton in the Republican runoff on May 19. The endorsement landed during early voting and gave Paxton a major boost against Sen. John Cornyn. The Texas Tribune reported Cornyn finished first in the March primary with 42% to Paxton’s 40.5%. That narrow result forced the head-to-head runoff between the longtime senator and the Texas attorney general. President Trump praised Paxton as a loyal America First fighter and criticized Cornyn for being late to support his 2024 campaign. Paxton said he was honored by the endorsement. He also said he looked forward to championing President Trump’s America First agenda in the Senate. The endorsement was a serious blow to Cornyn’s allies, including establishment Republicans who had urged the White House to support the incumbent. Rep. Wesley Hunt, who finished third in March, endorsed Paxton shortly after President Trump did. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr set the internet ablaze earlier this year when a video surfaced of him using methylene blue while on a flight. Methylene blue is just now getting widespread attention, however, according to The New York Post: In recent years, celebrities, wellness influencers and biohackers have touted methylene blue for several off-label uses, claiming it can boost energy levels and metabolism, enhance cognitive function and combat aging — though evidence remains limited. Early research suggests that methylene blue may have antioxidant properties that help reduce toxic proteins in the brain, potentially aiding in the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Some studies also indicate that the drug may help delay skin aging by stimulating the production of collagen and elastin, reducing cellular damage and promoting wound healing.  WHAT IS METHYLENE BLUE? First used in the 1800s as a textile dye, visionary physician Paul Ehrlich discovered methylene blue’s antimicrobial properties against malaria—making this the first synthetic drug in modern medicine. Today, this century-old compound is FDA-approved for methemoglobinemia (a condition in which the blood can’t carry oxygen properly) but has garnered renewed interest for its off-label applications, particularly in enhancing mitochondrial function, combating neurodegenerative diseases, and as adjunct treatment of long COVID. How methylene blue works and its “off-label” uses: Energy Backup:Methylene blue acts like a “backup generator” for your cells’ energy factories (mitochondria). When part of the energy production line (specifically “Complex I”) breaks down—due to toxins, disease, or aging—methylene blue moves electrons directly to later stages of the energy-making process, allowing cells to keep producing energy (ATP) even when parts of the system are damaged. Oxidative Stress Reduction:It acts like a molecular sponge, soaking up harmful molecules called reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage cells. By neutralizing these destructive molecules, it reduces oxidative stress—a key contributor to aging and diseases like Alzheimer’s. It also blocks caspase-6, an enzyme that drives brain inflammation and kills neurons in Alzheimer’s patients. Think of it as a two-in-one protector: it calms oxidative damage while stopping the enzyme that fuels brain cell death. Promising Off-Label Applications: Neurodegenerative diseases:Low doses enhance cerebral metabolism, improving outcomes in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s models. It also reduces swelling in traumatic brain injury victims. Chronic fatigue and Long COVID:Due to its ability to reduce oxidative stress and promote mitochondrial function, methylene blue shows promise in relieving long COVID symptoms. Septic shock and vasoplegic syndrome:By inhibiting nitric oxide synthase, it restores vascular tone. Malaria adjunct therapy:It disrupts Plasmodium metabolism, reducing parasitemia. HOW YOU CAN GET METHYLENE BLUE The medical experts at The Wellness Company – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Kelly Victory – were leaders in the efforts to provide the public with accurate medical information during COVID. These experts have repeatedly shown that they prioritized the health and welfare of their patients over the bottom line of the big pharmaceutical companies. Now the experts at The Wellness Company are making methylene blue available to you at home with RECHARGE! RECHARGE your cells with the first-ever combination of Methylene Blue and Urolithin A. Experience enhanced cognitive function and ultimate mitochondrial health. From sharper thinking to stronger cells, Methylene Blue enhances how your brain and body perform by enhancing mental clarity and focus, supporting blood flow, and increasing ATP production. Urolithin A promotes healthy aging by activating mitophagy. Mitophagy helps the body to recycle and rebuild mitochondria (the powerhouses of your cells) and enhances the benefits of Methylene Blue. RECHARGE has been scientifically formulated with research-backed ingredients to enhance mental clarity and focus and support ultimate mitochondrial health. Methylene Blue and Urolithin A are a powerful combo with potent antioxidants for healthy, youthful cells. Be like Bobby (Kennedy)! Add Methylene blue (and Urolithin A) to your healthcare regimen today! Click here to order RECHARGE now! (Note: The information provided is intended for generalized informational purposes only and should not be considered personal medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications. Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the links provided, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to keep you SAFE and HEALTY!) The information provided on this website is intended for informational purposes only and should not be considered medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications.   What do you think? This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

The Los Angeles mayoral race just got a lot more interesting. Spencer Pratt, the reality-TV star turned political candidate, says his campaign has filed a formal complaint accusing Mayor Karen Bass of violating California election law after she posted a campaign video near a ballot drop box during early voting. On May 25, Bass posted a video to X urging voters to drop off their ballots at voting centers and drop boxes throughout the city. The clip featured campaign signs, a baby in “Babies for Bass” gear, and footage near what appears to be an official ballot drop box. You can drop off your ballot at voting centers and drop boxes throughout the city. Voting early is easy, even Babies for Bass agree! pic.twitter.com/aVw3WuPLwB — Karen Bass (@KarenBassLA) May 25, 2026 Pratt fired back the next day, calling it a blatant violation of election law and announcing the formal complaint. The Washington Examiner laid out the complaint details this way: Pratt’s attorney Peter McNulty submitted the complaint to Los Angeles City Clerk Patrice Lattimore. The complaint says Bass violated election code based on the video she posted and alleges no person may engage in electioneering within 100 feet of a polling place or ballot drop box. The filing argues the problem was not merely proximity. Pratt’s side says the video showed Bass, supporters, campaign signs, and ballot drop-off activity wrapped into one public campaign message during early voting. McNulty argued that Bass showed herself and others submitting ballots into drop boxes while electioneering, soliciting votes, and promoting that activity across social media. The complaint asks city officials to investigate the alleged violations and treat them as more than a campaign squabble. Pratt framed the complaint as a demand for equal enforcement, not a limit on political speech. The timing matters because ballots are already moving in Los Angeles, and the June 2 primary is close enough that a late election-law fight can immediately shape voter trust. The complaint also puts the city clerk in an awkward position because Bass appointed Patrice Lattimore in September 2025. The law Pratt’s team is citing is not obscure or ambiguous. The relevant California election law is where the fight gets concrete: Section 319.5 defines electioneering as visible display or audible dissemination of information advocating for or against a candidate or measure within the 100-foot limit. The listed examples include displaying a candidate’s name, likeness, or logo, along with campaign apparel, campaign signs, stickers, buttons, hats, pencils, and pens. The statute also covers audible electioneering and activity at vote-by-mail ballot drop boxes. It specifically lists obstructing access to, loitering near, or disseminating visible or audible electioneering information at drop boxes as prohibited activity. The 100-foot restriction applies to the entrance of a polling-place building, an elections official’s office, a satellite location, or an outdoor site where a voter may cast or drop off a ballot. That is why the exact location of the signs, the voters, and the ballot box becomes the center of this fight. In other words, this turns on distance, display, and solicitation. The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk publishes its own electioneering guidance reinforcing that rule. Within 100 feet of polling places, curbside voting areas, or drop boxes, no one may ask a person to vote for or against a candidate, display a candidate’s name, image, or logo, block access or loiter near drop boxes, or distribute electioneering material. Bass campaign spokesperson Alex Stack denied any wrongdoing, claiming the campaign-sign footage and the drop-box footage were filmed at separate locations roughly 200 feet apart. That defense will need to hold up under scrutiny. The video Bass posted splices the footage together into a single campaign message, and Pratt’s legal team clearly believes the combined presentation constitutes a violation regardless of where individual clips were shot. Karen Bass just violated election law here. She is so accustomed to breaking the law with no accountability, she even filmed herself doing it. Well, those days are over. We just filed a formal complaint for illegally gaming the election. We must protect our democracy.… https://t.co/NcgFElQSQA pic.twitter.com/Oz33YQ9Y7b — Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) May 26, 2026 The complaint lands at a critical moment in the race. A recent Emerson poll showed Bass leading with 30%, Pratt at 22%, and City Councilmember Nithya Raman at 19%, with 16% of voters still undecided. If no candidate clears 50% in the June 2 primary, the top two finishers advance to a November runoff. Pratt has made election integrity a centerpiece of his unlikely but very real campaign. Whether or not this complaint results in any formal action, it puts Bass on defense at exactly the wrong time and forces her to explain why her team thought filming campaign content near a ballot drop box was a good idea in the first place. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.