I have three brand new revelations from the Epstein Files that might be the worst things we’ve seen yet. WARNING: this is extremely graphic and very troubling, proceed at your own risk. First up is that Dentist Chair…. Remember when we first discovered that? Remember how out of place it seemed? Well, never in a million years would I have thought of this but I think we may have just discovered why that was there: I JUST REALISED THEY WERE REMOVING CHILDREN’S TEETH SO THEY WOULDN’T BITE https://t.co/VkrenUjqLK — Yamch1 (@Yamch1Q) February 10, 2026 Absolutely horrific! One thing I’m confident about is that it wasn’t just to provide free dental care! And if that isn’t the reason, then this might be the other reason: Also to remodel teeth to prevent identification… — heiho1@yahoo.com (@Earthbalance1) February 10, 2026 Simply terrible! I hope President Trump finds anyone responsible for this and gives them the immediate death penalty! And if that’s not the worst thing we’ve seen, then this definitely is: They murdered a little Christian girl and then mocked her love for Jesus Christ. This is who rules over us. I want them to suffer for all of eternity. pic.twitter.com/Hzz4AiMDVd — Morgan Ariel (@itsmorganariel) February 10, 2026 The worst Epstein document I’ve seen Normal human beings are not capable of understanding the level of evil we are dealing with pic.twitter.com/fGE0Ew5mHT — redpillbot (@redpillb0t) February 10, 2026 Folks, there should be DAILY riots in the streets over this until everyone responsible for this is found!! And can anyone tell me why the names in the emails are redacted in all these files? Like the one above…. I understand redacting the victims, but why are we redacting people who send and receive the worst filth you can ever imagine like the email above? WE DEMAND TO SEE THOSE NAMES! And we’ll end with this third one, plus a Fact-Check. The claim on this one is that these Pedo Creeps were essentially using school class photos like a menu to order from: They were using your child’s School Pictures and yearbooks like a shopping catalog. They could identify and locate children like they were ordering from a menu. This is demonic. pic.twitter.com/abeeYHfm6z — TEMPLER (@TEMPLERTV) February 9, 2026 HOW THEY FIND OUR CHILDREN “Pictures are the big picture” If you went to school in the U.S. in the last 80 years, you’ll remember Lifetouch. They did all our yearbook photos. The ENTIRE LIFETOUCH DATABASE is in THE EPSTEIN FILES They could run database queries… https://t.co/syQOgbM7kP pic.twitter.com/t7btSOdNc4 — Dr. James Joyce (@drjamesbjoyce) February 9, 2026 But now an important Fact-Check….is that actually true? Parts are true, but not the main claim. From Grok: No Evidence of Lifetouch Database in Epstein Files No, there is no credible evidence that the entire Lifetouch database—or any part of it—was found in the Epstein files. This claim appears to stem from viral social media posts and videos circulating in early February 2026, which speculate on connections between Lifetouch’s parent company and Jeffrey Epstein but lack substantiation from official sources or investigations. Background on the Claim The allegation gained traction from an X post (and related TikTok video) by @drjamesbjoyce on February 9, 2026, which asserted that Lifetouch’s database of student photos, addresses, and details was used to “harvest” children for Epstein’s network. This post went viral, with over 6,000 likes and thousands of reposts, sparking petitions, boycotts, and parental concerns. Similar claims appear in Reddit threads, Instagram reels, and Facebook discussions, often linking it to broader fears about child data privacy. However, these are user-generated and echo the same unverified narrative without primary evidence. What the Epstein Files Actually Show The U.S. Department of Justice released over 3 million pages of Epstein-related files in late January and early February 2026, including emails, calendars, investigative reports, and victim diagrams. These build on prior releases (e.g., from 2019-2024) and focus on Epstein’s ties to prominent figures.   Epstein is documented as maintaining a database of his victims, based on flight logs and other records from 2001-2019, as alleged in a 2020 U.S. Virgin Islands complaint against his estate. This was not connected to Lifetouch or school photos. No released files mention Lifetouch by name, nor do they include any school photo databases. Searches of the DOJ’s Epstein file repository (e.g., datasets from the releases) yield no matches for “Lifetouch” or related queries. The Real Connections and Concerns Ownership Ties Lifetouch, a major U.S. school photography company serving millions of students annually, is owned by Shutterfly, which was acquired by Apollo Global Management in 2019. Apollo was co-founded by billionaire Leon Black, who had documented financial dealings with Epstein: +1   Black paid Epstein $158 million for tax and estate advice between 2012 and 2017. Black settled a $62.5 million lawsuit with the U.S. Virgin Islands in 2023 over allegations tied to Epstein’s activities (though Black denied wrongdoing).   Emails from the 2026 releases show Apollo’s current CEO, Marc Rowan, consulting Epstein on tax issues. Conclusion These links have fueled speculation about data misuse, especially since Lifetouch collects and stores student information (photos, names, schools, grades, contact details) even if photos aren’t purchased. However, no evidence from court records, investigations, or the files themselves indicates that Lifetouch data was shared with Epstein or his associates. Broader privacy risks exist with aggregated student data, but claims of direct Epstein access remain unfounded and appear to be an exaggeration of the ownership connections.

We’ve had a lot of very heavy news recently, and I’m actually working on a new story right now that is basically the worst thing you’ve ever seen or heard and it’s related to Epstein, so every once in a while we just need to come up for air and have a little breather. And that’s what I’m doing with this one. Ordinarily, I hate almost all things AI-slop, but this one is a real gem. Because of course Donald J. Trump is the man… And of course LeBron James is a flopping loser…. So putting both of those together to see President Trump mopping the floor with LeBum James and breaking his ankles on the basketball court brought me a lot of joy! Enjoy: What can’t he do? pic.twitter.com/wtjcfpq6qJ — Sovey (@SoveyX) February 10, 2026 Love it!

Apricot Seeds Bitter By Design. For centuries, Apricot Seeds were simply… food. They were eaten whole, ground into meal, pressed for oil, and used traditionally across cultures without controversy or fear. So how did a simple Apricot Seed become one of the most misunderstood natural foods in the modern world? The answer has less to do with nutrition and far more to do with narrative. The Seed That Didn’t Fit the Story Apricot Seeds are naturally bitter. That bitterness isn’t a flaw — it’s a signal. In nature, bitterness often indicates the presence of potent plant compounds meant to be respected, not abused. Historically, bitter foods weren’t avoided. They were understood. Cultures built around whole, unprocessed diets routinely included bitter roots, leaves, and seeds in daily life. Apricot Seeds Bitter By Design: One of the Most Misunderstood Foods on Earth But modern food systems don’t favor bitter. They favor sweet. Bland. Uniform. Highly processed. And that’s where the story began to shift. From Traditional Food to “Fear Food” During the 20th century, Apricot Seeds gradually stopped being discussed as food. Instead, they were reframed—often selectively and sensationalized—as inherently dangerous when stripped of context, tradition, and moderation. Instead of asking: How were Apricot Seeds historically used? Why did certain populations consume them as part of traditional diets? What role did they play within whole-food nutrition patterns? The conversation shifted to: “Why hasn’t this been approved?” “Why does it contain something that sounds alarming?” “Why isn’t this more tightly controlled?” Curiosity was replaced by caution. Education was replaced by headlines. Nuance disappeared. The Bitterness Is the Point Here’s something rarely stated plainly: The bitterness of Apricot Seeds is intentional. It naturally discourages excess. It encourages moderation. It demands awareness. That’s how many whole foods function — self-limiting, not engineered for overconsumption. Compare that to ultra-processed products designed to override natural satiety signals, and the contrast becomes obvious. The Apricot Seed didn’t change. The system around it did. It didn’t fit neatly into a model built around patents, standardization, and simplification. Whole Foods Don’t Ask for Permission Apricot Seeds don’t come with a marketing department. They don’t need a rebrand. They don’t promise miracles. They simply exist, as they have for thousands of years. And that consistency is precisely what makes them uncomfortable in a culture that prefers regulation before understanding. Because whole foods remind us of something modern society often forgets: Health was once about relationships, not regulation. About wisdom, not warnings. About food, not fear. Relearning Discernment This isn’t about elevating a single food to hero status. No seed, supplement, or “superfood” replaces a thoughtful, balanced lifestyle. But Apricot Seeds matter because they force a better question: When did we stop engaging with nature thoughtfully and start outsourcing discernment entirely? Understanding restores agency. And bitterness,  it turns out, can be a very good teacher. Key Takeaway Apricot Seeds are controversial not because they are inherently reckless, but because they don’t fit neatly into systems that prioritize control over context. Sometimes the most misunderstood foods are simply the ones that refuse to be simplified. Want to Learn More?   Download the Book, World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17 by G. Edward Griffin — Free PDF available. Explore Natural Options and Receive a 10% Discount: Learn about Laetrile, B17, and Apricot Seeds at https://RNCstore.com/WLT. Join the Movement: Visit Operation World Without Cancer to support research, education, and advocacy for natural healing. Find a Wellness Provider: Visit B17works.com to connect with a  Richardson Certified Provider.  

Words have consequences. And a man in Georgia found out the hard way. A man in Georgia who threatened to kill President Trump during a livestream has been sentenced. Jauan Porter of Georgia was arrested and convicted last year after he threatened to take the life of President Trump during a TikTok livestream. Local 3 News provided further details on the man’s sentencing: A man from Floyd County, GA, has been sentenced to prison for threatening to assassinate President Donald Trump, according to the U.S. Department of Justice. Jauan Rashun Porter, 30, was sentenced to three years and five months in prison, followed by three years of supervised release. Porter pleaded guilty and was convicted of one count of transmitting interstate threats on October 7, 2025. His charge stems from a TikTok livestream that took place on July 26, 2025, according to U.S. Attorney Theodore Hertzberg. Porter joined a TikTok livestream about the president, captioned “Alligator Alcatraz.” Hertzberg said Porter commented on the livestream, “So there’s only one way to make America great and that is putting a bullet in between Trump’s eyes.” Officials added that Porter also made several other threats to kill President Trump. But when he was asked by the livestream host about federal agents coming to his door, Porter said, “I’m gonna kill them too… and then kill myself.” Here’s a mugshot of Porter: A Georgia man was sent to federal prison for threatening to kill President Trump and federal agents on TikTok. His name is Jauan Rashun Porter, and his case shows that online threats against the President are treated like a federal crime. pic.twitter.com/xcpdvAw9l5 — Everything Georgia (@GAFollowers) February 10, 2026 Here was the DOJ’s statement on X regarding Porter’s sentencing: Jauan Rashun Porter has been sentenced to more than three years in federal prison for transmitting threats to kill the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.https://t.co/CPzTDYGMS2 pic.twitter.com/OB8N6hvtbF — US Attorney NDGA (@NDGAnews) February 9, 2026 The DOJ provided quotes from Porter’s livestream: According to U.S. Attorney Hertzberg, the charges, and other information presented in court: On July 26, 2025, Porter joined a TikTok livestream about President Trump captioned “Alligator Alcatraz,” commenting: “So there’s only one way to make America great and that is putting a bullet in between Trump’s eyes.” Over the next few minutes, Porter further stated: “I’m gonna kill Donald Trump. I’m gonna put a 7.62 bullet inside his forehead.” “I’m gonna watch him bleed out and I’m gonna watch him die.” “It’ll be on the news . . . his rally is coming up pretty soon and I’m going there and I’m going to put a bullet in his head.” “I’mma load up a rifle [and] sit inside . . . an abandoned building . . . and when he approaches the rally . . . I’m gonna put one . . . if not the face then . . . in his chest.” When asked by the livestream host about federal agents coming to his door, Porter stated, “I’m gonna kill them too . . . and then kill myself[.]” During the investigation, U.S. Secret Service agents, Floyd County police officers, and State of Georgia probation officers conducted searches of Porter’s apartment and found two pipes, pistol ammunition, and Tannerite (an explosive). They did not locate a gun. Porter has multiple prior felony convictions in Floyd County, including for terroristic threats and acts in 2018 and 2019, influencing a witness in 2019, and unlawful act of violence in a penal institution in 2023. He is currently on probation for a 2023 conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and battery domestic violence. Jauan Rashun Porter, 30, of Rome, Georgia, was sentenced by U.S. District Judge William M. Ray II to three years and five months in prison to be followed by three years of supervised release. Porter was convicted on October 7, 2025, after he pleaded guilty to one count of transmitting interstate threats. Porter was detained in this case on August 8, 2025.

It appears many lawmakers are finally realizing they are too old or overwhelmed to handle the daily duties of serving as a U.S. lawmaker. The drastic number of lawmakers retiring or deciding not to run for re-election is about to hit historic numbers. In total, a combined 60 lawmakers, including both representatives and senators, have announced their days in Congress will soon be over. NBC News broke down the numbers in each party: Some feel they’ve hit an appropriate retirement age. Others want to tend to their health or their families. Yet more are leaving because they don’t like the workplace. Add it all together, and members of Congress are heading for the exit at a historically high rate ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, with two more House Republicans adding themselves to a growing roster just last week. Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., announced Wednesday that he was retiring from Congress, while Rep. Mark Amodei, R-Nev., announced Friday that he wouldn’t run for re-election, either. Loudermilk said he wants “to spend more dedicated time with my family,” while Amodei said it was “the right time for Nevada and myself to pass the torch.” The latest retirements mean 60 members of Congress have decided not to run for re-election this year — 51 House members and nine senators. It’s the most retirements from both chambers combined this century, according to historical data from the Brookings Institution’s Vital Statistics on Congress. That includes lawmakers who are retiring from political life altogether and those leaving their seats to run for other offices, but it doesn’t include members who have resigned or died during the current Congress. So far, 30 House Republicans are retiring, compared with 21 Democrats. The Senate is more evenly divided, with five Republicans and four Democrats retiring, as Democrats face an uphill battle to net the four seats they need for control. The Senate figure also doesn’t include a handful of members who are running for other offices but aren’t up for re-election this year, like Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn., Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., and Michael Bennet, D-Colo. The exits equate to 11% of Congress: Over 11% of Congress is retiring or seeking another office after 2026 — and I got you covered on live updates! Keep tabs on who’s saying goodbye to politics…for now…and who’s looking for a new job (& check out our cool graphics by @grace_hagerman_ !)https://t.co/BY5MLbyr9S pic.twitter.com/f5AIIK5RTG — Rachel Schilke (@rachel_schilke) February 10, 2026 My News 4 reported on the latest Republican to announce his retirement from Congress: For the first time in 15 years, it’s a wide-open race for Nevada’s Second Congressional District in 2026, following Rep. Mark Amodei’s announcement Friday that he would retire at the end of his term. The announcement, which came as a surprise to many political observers, has created renewed interest in a typically predictable contest. As Amodei retires, GOP contenders consider open Nevada seat, Dems eye ‘longshot’ flip Possible GOP contenders are considering whether to run, with at least one already declining to purse the seat. Meanwhile, Democrats see strong headwinds for Republicans in the midterms and believe they have a ‘long shot’ to turn the seat blue for the first time ever. Hopefully, the exits of these lawmakers will bring in a new generation of lawmakers ready to put America first.