Ivermectin, the hero of the pandemic, is having a moment again. Thanks to cutting edge research and a commitment to finding safe, affordable and effective medical treatments, Ivermectin is now being used to treat everything from skin diseases to parasite infections to pandemics and even has shown amazing potential as a cancer treatment! That’s the good news; the bad news is that the overwhelming majority of Ivermectin being sold globally comes from Asia (75%). Even worse, 58% of Ivermectin sold globally comes from China! Buying American-made products is always important, but when it comes to prescription drugs and supplements – buying American is more than just the right thing to do, it is imperative to insure you are getting only the safest and highest quality products. We know the role that China played in unleashing the COVID-19 plandemic on the world and we know that China is flooding the United States with fentanyl that is responsible for killing tens of thousands of Americans every single year. Where to Get American Made Ivermectin We know Ivermectin works, but how can we guarantee that the Ivermectin you order is actually made here in the USA? That’s where The Wellness Company comes in! The Wellness Company and its freedom-fighting medical experts – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Kelly victory – are the gold standard for providing safe, effective and affordable medical solutions. The Wellness Company’s doctors are the doctors who courageously told the truth during the pandemic and they continue to be the nation’s leading voices for putting the health and well-being of the American people above the greed and profits of big pharma and the medical establishment. The Wellness Company is offering Ivermectin that is 100% made in America! Not Just Made in America – But at a Price You Can’t Beat Not only is The Wellness Company offering you Ivermectin made in the USA, it is offering it to you at a price you can’t beat! While most other pharmacies are charging $5 a tablet for Ivermectin, often for lower dosage, The Wellness Company is offering higher dosage Ivermectin (18mg) at just $3.33 a tablet! About TWC’s Ivermectin Proven Antiparasitic Therapy — Prescribed globally for over 30 years and awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine, Ivermectin has a wide range of uses outside of COVID-19 including eliminating a wide spectrum of parasites that impact health and wellbeing. Convenient 6-Month Supply — Each order includes 84 capsules (18mg each), designed for four 21-day cleanse cycles with 14-day breaks in between. This structure supports effective parasite management with only two fills per year. Affordable & Trusted — A streamlined regimen at a lower price point than combination therapies, while maintaining a strong safety profile and decades of clinical use. Ivermectin should be in every American’s medicine cabinet, and it should be Ivermectin made here in the USA from a company you can trust at the best price around. Don’t wait – order a 6-month supply of Ivermectin today! (Note: The information provided is intended for generalized informational purposes only and should not be considered personal medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications. Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the links provided, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to keep you SAFE and HEALTY!)

A federal judge in Georgia handed President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice a significant legal win this week, ruling that the FBI does not have to return more than 600 boxes of 2020 election ballots and records seized from Fulton County earlier this year. U.S. District Judge Jean-Paul Boulee denied the county’s motion to force the materials back, finding that Fulton County failed to clear the high legal bar needed for a court to step into an active federal investigation. The ruling, filed May 6, means the DOJ’s probe into alleged irregularities in Fulton County’s handling of the 2020 election continues with the physical evidence firmly in federal hands. A federal judge just ruled that the U.S. Department of Justice does not have to return 2020 election ballots seized by FBI agents to Fulton County.https://t.co/esjC46HEXO — Greg Bluestein (@bluestein) May 7, 2026 The Fulton County Board of Commissioners, Board of Registration and Elections, and Clerk of Court Che Alexander had filed a motion under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g) seeking the return of ballots, vote-tabulator tapes, ballot images, and voter rolls taken by FBI agents from a county election warehouse on January 28, 2026. They amended the motion on February 17, and the court held an evidentiary hearing on March 27 before receiving additional evidence and supplemental briefing. The full court order lays out why every prong of the legal test weighed against Fulton County. Judge Boulee applied the Richey equitable-jurisdiction framework, which controls when a court should order the government to return seized property during an ongoing investigation. Fulton County needed to show more than disagreement with the warrant affidavit. The county had to establish that federal investigators acted with “callous disregard” for its rights, that it needed the original materials, that it would suffer irreparable injury without them, and that no adequate legal remedy existed. The order found that Fulton County failed on each point. Boulee acknowledged that parts of the affidavit were flawed, including the way it handled scanner-programming context, ballot images, and tabulator-tape issues. He also said the affidavit contained facts that cut both directions, and the county did not claim the FBI case agent intentionally lied. The court found Fulton County already had copies of the seized records, had not shown concrete irreparable harm, and had not shown the seizure would interfere with the 2020 certification or future elections. The amended Rule 41(g) motion was denied, and the clerk was directed to close the case. The copies issue drove a major part of the ruling. Fulton County already had access to the records it said it needed, while federal investigators kept custody of the originals. On that record, the county could not show the kind of concrete harm that would justify a federal court stepping into a live probe and ordering the evidence returned. The underlying investigation centers on a range of irregularities flagged in the FBI’s warrant affidavit, including missing ballot images, duplicate ballots, issues with tabulator tapes, the appearance of pristine ballots, problems identified during the risk-limiting audit, and discrepancies in recount numbers. None of those allegations have been adjudicated or proven at this stage, but the DOJ now has the physical materials to continue examining them. As CBS News reported, the scope of the FBI’s January search was sweeping. The FBI search centered on far more than a small paper file. Agents went to a Fulton County elections office earlier this year with a court-authorized warrant and took ballots and other 2020 election materials. The materials at issue included physical ballots, vote-tabulator tapes, digital ballot images, voter-roll records, and related materials connected to the county’s 2020 election operations. Fulton County then asked the court to force those materials back quickly, arguing the warrant process and affidavit did not justify federal custody of the originals. The ruling left room for criticism of the affidavit without giving the county the remedy it wanted. Judge Boulee found some statements and omissions defective, including parts dealing with election mechanics and the way certain concerns were presented. Still, the legal question was not whether the affidavit was flawless. The legal question was whether Fulton County met the demanding standard for return of property during an active investigation. Boulee concluded it did not, after amended filings, an evidentiary hearing, additional evidence, and supplemental briefing. Fulton County lost the immediate return fight. The Washington Examiner added context about the scale of the seizure and one notable observation from the bench. The scale of the January seizure is part of what made the fight so politically charged. Federal agents took more than 600 boxes of election records from a Fulton County election warehouse after obtaining a search warrant tied to alleged irregularities from the 2020 presidential election, a haul large enough to trigger an immediate fight over custody and control. Fulton County argued that losing physical custody of the originals harmed its authority, complicated public-records and litigation obligations, and created concerns about how local election materials could be handled by federal investigators. Boulee treated those concerns seriously, but the ruling turned on proof. The seizure happened years after the 2020 vote was conducted and certified, and the county did not show that federal custody of the originals would hinder future elections. The court also weighed the fact that Fulton County retained copies of the records. That undercut the claim that the county needed the originals back immediately or would suffer irreparable injury if the DOJ kept them while the investigation continued. Judge Boulee’s candid acknowledgment that the affidavit had flaws is notable, and Fulton County’s attorneys will no doubt point to that language going forward. But acknowledging imperfections and ordering the government to surrender evidence mid-investigation are two very different things. The court made clear that the legal standard for the latter was not met.

Amid a contentious special session and severe weather that forced an evacuation, the Alabama Legislature passed legislation that could set new primary election dates pending a potential Supreme Court decision. After several hours of debate, both legislative chambers approved HB-1 and SB-1. The legislation would create a special primary election using a congressional map previously struck down by a three-judge federal panel. The special primary election would only take place if an injunction requiring Alabama to use a court-drawn map through 2030 is lifted. NBC 15: Alabama lawmakers are set to vote Friday on redistricting-related legislation that could trigger new elections. “The legislation would create a special primary election using a congressional map previously struck down by a three-judge federal panel, but only if an… — Politics & Poll Tracker (@PollTracker2024) May 7, 2026 CBS 42 has more: Right now, Attorney General Steve Marshall is asking for the Supreme Court to lift a preliminary injunction that prevents Alabama from using a congressional map approved by legislature in 2023. Representative Adline Clark said the 2023 map targets predominantly Black voting districts and will dilute Black voting power. “We may very well lose not one, but both of those seats, because we have Republicans here saying that all seven of those seats ought to be filled by Republicans,” Clark explained. On the Senate side of things, SB-1 allows for special primary elections for state Senate seats for potentially impacted districts if the Supreme Court rules in Alabama’s favor. Coleman said the bill was passed as the building was being evacuated. “Crazy moments unfolding at the Alabama State House. During Senate debate over the redistricting bill involving Senate Districts 25 and 26, fire alarms suddenly began sounding after an already tense day that included a tornado warning,” one X user wrote. “The Senate quickly moved to pass the bill as Democrats dropped their filibuster, and lawmakers, staff, and members of the media are now evacuating the State House,” he added. Crazy moments unfolding at the Alabama State House. During Senate debate over the redistricting bill involving Senate Districts 25 and 26, fire alarms suddenly began sounding after an already tense day that included a tornado warning. The Senate quickly moved to pass the bill as… pic.twitter.com/xryHOVMoTK — Jeff Sanders (@JeffSandersNews) May 6, 2026 “Chaos in Alabama: Republican State Senators rammed through a bill to advance redistricting while tornado sirens blared, the chamber was being evacuated, and the livestream went dark,” another X user commented. Chaos in Alabama: Republican State Senators rammed through a bill to advance redistricting while tornado sirens blared, the chamber was being evacuated, and the livestream went dark. When this is how they pass it – that tells you everything you need to know. pic.twitter.com/J1Fem4gwNb — Max Flugrath (@MaxFlugrath) May 6, 2026 “We heard flooding, of course, then we got the tornado,” said Sen. Merika Coleman, according to CBS 42. “The tornado, you know, we heard the blaring of that as well. Someone said they were checking to see if there were any snakes down in there,” she continued. “We’re in inclement weather. This building is flooded. We’ve had several people to have medical emergencies, including one of my constituents and a senator,” Coleman added. The area around the Alabama State House began flooding. Check it out: Lots of rain here at the State House. Actually, it’s flooding. Everyone came down to the first floor during the tornado warning and now they are headed upstairs because the first floor is flooding. Remember, the Senate is still meeting upstairs!#alpolitics@spann pic.twitter.com/mFmmoOdoWQ — Todd Stacy (@toddcstacy) May 6, 2026 Flooding getting real at the State House. Feels like 2009. Could be only a matter of time before the power goes out. @spann #alpolitics pic.twitter.com/5MY1kStzE7 — Todd Stacy (@toddcstacy) May 6, 2026 Alabama Reflector shared further: The legislation drew sharp criticism from Democrats, who said the bills aimed to reduce Black political representation in the Legislature. “This body continues to find more ways to make voting more difficult, more ways to suppress the vote and more ways to dilute the power of the Black vote,” said Rep. Adline Clarke, D-Mobile. “Make no mistake, that’s what HB 1 would do, and it’s a tragic step backwards for Black Alabama voters. But we’ve been here before and we will not give up this fight.” The legislation will only take effect if federal courts respond favorably to a flurry of cases filed by Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall seeking to reverse federal court rulings in 2023 and 2025 that found congressional and legislative maps approved by the Legislature violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and discriminated against Black voters. The rulings led to new court-ordered maps. The U.S. Supreme Court last week weakened Section 2 in a case known as Louisiana v. Callais. However, Justice Samuel Alito wrote that the ruling did not apply to Allen v. Milligan, the 2023 case that led to congressional redistricting.

Indian River State College has scrapped a proposed $1.5 million data center campus in Okeechobee County after immense public backlash. The project would have been state-funded via Gov. Ron DeSantis’ rural infrastructure fund. However, DeSantis said he did not personally approve the specific plans. A state-subsidized data center project in Okeechobee County, Florida was rejected after unanimous opposition from local ranchers and residents. The project received roughly $1.5 million from the Governor’s Rural Infrastructure Fund. Community concerns centered on water use,… pic.twitter.com/v24YrvIVgr — Localize – Farmers Market (@Localizefoodapp) May 7, 2026 South Florida Sun Sentinel explained further: A Florida state college’s plan to build a data center near Lake Okeechobee has stoked fierce pushback from residents and an about-face from the DeSantis administration, which granted $1.5 million in state funds to the project and now says it was deceived. But college leaders say that the conflict is just a misunderstanding. Indian River State College has been working for years on the “Okee-One Data Campus” in the town of Okeechobee. The campus, which is slated to include a data center, is planned for a 205-acre rural parcel that sits along Highway 441, about two and a half hours east of Sarasota. In a February presentation before the Okeechobee County Commission, a college official noted multiple times that the project would not have moved forward without support from Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration. He also stirred anxiety — noting the project’s potential to grow in size, use more electricity and possibly involve a mega-data center corporation like Nvidia. The project has proceeded without any public vote for approval in the city or county governments, because the land is controlled by the state college. The parcel has a dark history. To make way for the center, the college plans to bulldoze most of the remnants of the former Florida School for Boys at Okeechobee, an infamous reform school where students were systematically abused. It’s the sister campus to the more well-known Arthur G. Dozier School for Boys in Marianna, where students were so brutally beaten that dozens of bodies have been found in unmarked graves. Resistance against the planned data center intensified, culminating in a petition that tallied thousands of signatures. One resident said one of his biggest worries about the project was its potential environmental impact. The proposed site was in “proximity to sensitive waterways connected to Lake Okeechobee and the Everglades,” WPBF noted. “It’s our home, and once we give it up, we won’t get it back. So I urge you, let’s stand together and speak clearly and protect what makes this place worth living here for,” one concerned resident said, according to the outlet. WPBF shared further: College officials have said the Okee-One data center would be small, at least initially, and would include a learning lab for students studying AI and data technology. They have also pointed to possible economic growth and jobs. But some residents remain skeptical that those promises will pay off for the community. “Data centers are not like small business that could become part of the community. They are massive industrial facilities. They consume enormous amounts of resources that we depend on every day.” “They hum constantly, they generate heat and they often require large-scale infrastructure changes in a place like ours.” “And what do we get in return? A handful of jobs, temporary construction work and few very long-term positions,” said one resident at the commission meeting April 9. Residents organized protests to oppose the project and voiced their concerns at public meetings. “The Okee-One project has been discontinued and is no longer active,” Indian River State College said in a statement to TCPalm. “The abrupt cancellation was the culmination of more than a month of opposition from Okeechobee residents,” the newspaper stated. TCPalm has more: Following residential opposition, Okeechobee County Commissioner Terry Burroughs discussed the proposal with Florida Commerce Secretary Alex Kelly, and he shared that conversation during an April 23 County Commission meeting. The college “will return almost 50% of the money,” Burroughs said. “The data center is not going to be built.” The DeSantis administration, since approving state funding for Okee-One, has taken a stronger stance against large data centers in Florida. Kelly, however, was initially supportive. “We are grateful for our continued partnership with Indian River State College as they establish the Okee-One data campus and provide Florida’s future job seekers with valuable skills in high-demand fields,” Kelly said in a 2025 statement. Wyatt Deihl, who grew up in Okeechobee and graduated with an associate’s degree at the state college in 2018, launched a petition against the college’s proposal that received more than 3,100 signatures. Deihl learned about the proposal on social media, he told TCPalm. At the time, it was initially framed as a “technical training campus,” he said. But the environmental, economic and public health consequences of data centers later became clear, he said. “While Okeechobee residents are celebrating this victory, we remain vigilant,” Deihl said over text. “Our focus now is on oversight, ensuring local officials prioritize public safety over Big Tech interests.”

Big breaking news this afternoon out of Iran as the Pentagon has confirmed Iran launched strikes on US Navy Destroyers. Luckily, those strikes were all intercepted and no damage was done. The US Military continues to perform flawlessly! Watch President Trump right here: BREAKING: The Pentagon has CONFIRMED Iran attacked US Navy destroyers, but those strikes were intercepted. Missiles, drones, and small boats were used against the USS Truxton, USS Raphael Peralta, and USS Mason. NONE of our assets were struck, thank God. Pray for our sailors pic.twitter.com/ui5PUHQHDI — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) May 7, 2026 President Trump warned them the retaliation would be swift and severe if Iran did this, and counterstrikes now on Iran have already begun. See here: JUST IN: US strikes on Iran seem to be ONGOING, as Fox reports the US has now hit Iran’s Bandar Kargan naval checkpoint in Minab This comes amid unconfirmed reports that Iran targeted US Naval ships with anti-ship missiles To be fair: Trump warned ‘em pic.twitter.com/EAY0sEOCFr — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) May 7, 2026 More footage here: NOW: Iran is livid, publicly raging after the US military launched STRIKES — claiming OTHER COUNTRIES joined in against them Iran is bluffing that they caused "significant damage" against the US in response THIS IS PURE FAFO!pic.twitter.com/L9d4PgOGpn — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 7, 2026 Fox News had more details: The U.S. military also struck Iran’s Bandar Kargan naval checkpoint in Minab, officials confirmed. The development came as Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency also reported air defense activity in western Tehran. Two other loud explosions were heard Thursday night, while eyewitnesses told Iran International they heard multiple blasts in Chitgar. Iran’s state-run Mehr News Agency also reported attacks and exchanges of fire across Iran’s southern Hormozgan province near Bandar Abbas, Bandar Khamir, Sirik and Qeshm Island, according to reports. Thursday’s strike on Iran’s major port came two days after Iran fired 15 ballistic and cruise missiles at the UAE’s Fujairah Port. Those strikes sparked anger among Gulf countries, officials told Griffin, though Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine had said during a Pentagon briefing May 5 that those attacks did not amount to a violation of the ceasefire. Hegseth and Caine described the attacks as low-level incidents that did not rise to that threshold. More from President Trump in the Oval Office right here: https://x.com/EricLDaugh/status/2052503660827967838