President Trump has sounded off on NATO. On Wednesday evening, President Trump took to Truth Social to let NATO partners know he’s not happy with them. Trump stated in all caps, “NATO WASN’T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM.” “And they won’t be there when we need them again,” added Trump. Trump concluded his message by writing, “Remember Greenland.” Take a look: “NATO WASN’T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON’T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN. REMEMBER GREENLAND, THAT BIG, POORLY RUN, PIECE OF ICE!!!” – President Donald J. Trump pic.twitter.com/xgEV8P1n4n — The White House (@WhiteHouse) April 8, 2026 Trump’s comments come at an interesting time, as the White House has signaled that the United States may withdraw from NATO. Fox News reported more on the U.S. possibly withdrawing from NATO: President Donald Trump will meet with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte Wednesday at the White House, just as transatlantic relations within the alliance have frayed during U.S. operations in Iran. Ahead of the meeting, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt read a quote from Trump to reporters on NATO: “They were tested, and they failed.” “It’s quite sad that NATO turned their backs on the American people over the course of the last six weeks when it’s the American people who have been funding their defense,” she added. Leavitt predicted a “frank and candid” conversation between Trump and Rutte Wednesday afternoon. Trump repeatedly has threatened to withdraw the U.S. from NATO and slammed European nations for blocking base access and providing limited help to the Iran offensive known as Operation Epic Fury. Despite a good relationship with the head of NATO, who once called him “daddy” of the alliance, Trump has said he views NATO as a “one-way street.” “You’ll have to start learning how to fight for yourself, the U.S.A. won’t be there to help you anymore, just like you weren’t there for us,” he said to the alliance in a Truth Social post March 31. BREAKING: White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt reveals President Trump is still considering withdrawing the U.S. from NATO: "It's something the president has discussed, and I think it's something the president will be discussing in a couple of hours with Secretary… pic.twitter.com/9P8VtSq1ba — Fox News (@FoxNews) April 8, 2026 NATO Secretary General  Mark Rutte has responded to Trump’s frustrations with NATO: BREAKING: NATO SecGen Mark Rutte STUNS THE WORLD, comes out in SUPPORT of President Trump flaming our allies for abandoning the US during Operation Epic Fury This comes after Rutte met 47 at the White House RUTTE: "Some of them [failed]!" "[Iran] would lead to a North… pic.twitter.com/7pjlbm8nJQ — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 8, 2026 What do you think? Do you support Trump completely pulling out of NATO? NATIONAL POLL: Do You Support President Trump Pulling The U.S. Out of NATO?

During a forum at the University of Louisville, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) said he would consider running for Governor of Kentucky if he wins his GOP congressional primary this year. During the Q&A portion of the forum, Massie was asked if he would run for governor if he lost this year’s election. “He said a loss would mean returning to the farm, but he might consider running for governor over the Senate or presidency if he won,” The Louisville Cardinal wrote. “I’ve got to get to May 19 before I speculate about any of that. But if I’m looking at jobs and saying which would be the best job to have, probably governor,” Massie said. Report: Kentucky Congressman Thomas Massie is considering running for Governor of Kentucky in 2027 if he wins his primary in May pic.twitter.com/UUoBqrfxqC — The Calvin Coolidge Project (@TheCalvinCooli1) April 8, 2026 More from The Louisville Cardinal: He also addressed public education, touching on his bill to terminate the Department of Education. Massie emphasized he does not want to decrease public education funding, as he attended K-12 at public schools. Instead, he would rather keep the money in the state so officials can decide where it goes. U of L College Republicans President Dyllan Tipton said the forum drew 125 attendees, many of them students. Faculty, Kentucky Senator Lindsey Tichenor and former Congressman John Yarmuth were also in attendance. Tipton acknowledged that attendees were not just Republicans, but also independents and Democrats, calling the cross-ideological turnout positive. “We need more events that bring Democrats, Republicans, and everyone else together for healthy dialogue and debate,” he said. “Congressman Massie definitely fosters that vision, as he has worked across the aisle on many issues and is willing to stand up for his principles even when they go against his own party.” One poll in the GOP primary for Kentucky’s 4th Congressional District had Massie leading by approximately 10 percent. New: First independent poll of the KY-04 GOP primary has Massie up ~10, but short of a majority, against Trump-endorsed Ed Gallrein. Quantus Insights pegged the race at: Massie 47.4%, Gallrein 36.8%. They're rated a "B/C" pollster by @NateSilver538 https://t.co/HWxlE9KECv — Austin Horn (@_AustinHorn) April 9, 2026 Lexington Herald Leader noted: The first independent, public poll of GOP voters in Kentucky’s much-anticipated 4th Congressional District primary, released Wednesday, shows Rep. Thomas Massie with a double-digit lead, but not quite a majority, over a candidate endorsed by President Donald Trump. Quantus Insights conducted a survey of more than 400 likely Republican voters April 6-7 and found that, out of 437 likely voters, 47.4% would vote for Massie if the election were held today, compared to 36.8% who responded they’d vote for Ed Gallrein, the Shelby County veteran who has touted Trump’s endorsement in his campaign.

Ok folks, I’m sure there is an answer here that explains this, but let me show you the Bombshell we just discovered that sure does make it look like NASA is faking images from the Artemis II “Moon Mission”. Allow me to explain… A few days ago, a girl asked the Artemis II Astronauts why we didn’t see any Stars in the pictures of Space that Artemis was allegedly taking. For example, this image and video posted by NASA allegedly showing the Moon and Earth: “You can see the surface of the Moon…we just went sci-fi.” On flight day seven, images from our @NASAArtemis II crew amazed, turning science fiction to reality. From the lunar far side to a solar eclipse from the Moon, the views are EVERYTHING. No pressure to pick a favorite. pic.twitter.com/sHGfknqwW1 — NASA (@NASA) April 8, 2026 But where are the Stars? Or how about all of these? Hello, Moon. It’s great to be back. Here’s a taste of what the Artemis II astronauts photographed during their flight around the Moon. Check out more photos from the mission: https://t.co/rzM1P0QbOl pic.twitter.com/6jWINHkDLh — NASA (@NASA) April 7, 2026 No Stars to be seen! So NASA did what NASA always does….”ummm, we’ll get back to you on that!” And they did a few days later, posting this photo: Sky full of stars. Following a successful lunar flyby, the Artemis II astronauts captured this breathtaking photo of our galaxy, the Milky Way, on April 7, 2026. pic.twitter.com/pzqcLZNB71 — NASA (@NASA) April 8, 2026 Understand, this is a real Tweet posted by NASA on April 7, 2026. See, there are all the Stars! And the Artemis II definitely took this picture too, we promise! The only problem? It appears almost certainly that the Artemis II did not take that photo, and in fact it is an old photo several years old. CHECK. THIS. OUT. From my friend MJ, showing how he reverse image searched the photo and came up with results dating back to 2008: Ooooooo BUSTED NASA posted a “New” Photo of the Galaxy stating it was taken by the Artemis Crew on April 7, 2026 However, a reverse image search shows this is the same exact photo dating back to at least 2008. Case closed. NASA is fake. We live in firmament. lol Here is the… https://t.co/qlfoZXVqY0 pic.twitter.com/SoOKEOQCWM — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) April 8, 2026 If you’ve been around here for any length of time, you know I don’t just take something like that at face value…. I do my own research and test it myself. And folks….it’s true! At least, mostly true. Here’s the deal….I did my own reverse image search using a website called TinEye.com. I searched using this image, posted by NASA yesterday, claiming it was taken yesterday by the Artemis II: It gave me 23 pages of search results, and I went to Page 23 because I figured that would be the oldest results. I recommend you do it for yourself, but I believe this link will work to take you directly to Page 23 of my search results:  https://www.tineye.com/search/8b5438e0000b88bb2b0afec0a13a0c721ba10572?tags=&sort=score&order=desc&page=23 And when you get on that page, look particularly at this one: NOTE: that one is from 2017: Link to page here:  https://www.flickr.com/photos/pkoen/16489886993/ Ok, now at first you might look at that and say “Sorry Noah, it’s kind of similar but it’s not exactly the same.” But this is where TinEye is so cool…. When you click in, it shows you the original photo you searched with and the Matched Photo. And it lets you click back and forth. I highly recommend using the link above and doing it for yourself so you can see it change but here are screenshots showing both… NASA 2026: MATCH FROM 2017: Now you still might not see it from those still images, so I recorded a video of me switching back and forth between the two images. Folks, it’s the exact same image, just tilted a bit and the colors enhanced! Watch the video here: HOLY CRAP, NASA FAKED THE ARTEMIS II PHOTO OF THE STARS! Full report here: https://t.co/7WMUuG8k0S pic.twitter.com/Pa9RHAm25j — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) April 9, 2026 Full screen player here: HOLY CRAP, NASA FAKED THE ARTEMIS II PHOTO OF THE STARS! Full report here: https://t.co/7WMUuG8k0S ☝️ pic.twitter.com/Pa9RHAm25j — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) April 9, 2026 It’s clear as day, that photo is at least from 2017. And my friend MJ dated it back to 2008, but I can personally attest to 2017. In either event, NOT taken by NASA in 2026. So there you have it folks…if they can’t take a normal picture of the Stars without faking it, is the entire mission fake? Why fake this photo? Why does it seem like EVERY NASA mission always has clearly faked photos? Why do that? Your thoughts? I’m all ears to hear what you think, but I can’t explain this one! RELATED REPORTS: Let’s Talk About The Artemis II Moon Launch Let’s Talk About The Artemis II Moon Launch — Part 2 Let’s Talk About The Artemis II Moon Launch — Part 3 NASA allegedly has four Astronauts tooling around in Space, about to joyride past the Moon and then slingshot home, but the more we see, the more questions I have. So welcome to Part 3 of this series. I’ll repost Parts 1 and 2 down below in case you missed them. Today we have to talk about this image, from NASA itself…. Take a look at the image below, which NASA says is about halfway to the Moon, and the really small little dot you see in the middle is the Moon.  Again, all according to NASA. See here: We’re halfway there. At the time of posting this, the Artemis II mission is about halfway to the Moon. When the astronauts arrive, they will conduct a lunar flyby and collect scientific observations of the Moon’s surface. pic.twitter.com/Re8dryeX6k — NASA Artemis (@NASAArtemis) April 4, 2026 Anyone notice anything weird about that? I’ll give you a second…. Ok, so here’s what I’d like to know — how can the Moon be big in the sky above Earth, but after traveling literally 50% of the way towards the Moon, it drastically shrinks? The Moon is trying to out run the "space Kraft" pic.twitter.com/HzlbAlqfrF — True Earth (@TrueEarth2) April 4, 2026 Say what now? That makes ZERO sense! Why does everything from NASA never seem to make any sense? It’s almost as if….they’re just making it all up as they go, and they’re really not even very good at it.  Very sloppy! Then we have an update on the bathroom, which is malfunctioning and now has a “burning smell” coming from it: The Artemis II capsule reportedly has a “burning smell” coming from its toilet system. That’s a sealed spacecraft, a confined crew, and nowhere to go if something’s off. Imagine being halfway to the Moon, part of one of the most advanced missions ever built by NASA… …and… https://t.co/eR819VRj7u pic.twitter.com/6GhpFP9mXW — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) April 4, 2026 That’s not good! How many rocket scientists does it take to build a working bathroom? Apparently more than work at NASA! Then there is also this: You’re shown carefully selected images, same clouds, same angle, supposedly 12 hours apart, and no one stops to think. A skydiver can film everything in high quality, but somehow a multi-billion dollar mission gives you blurry, choppy footage, and people just accept it. They show… pic.twitter.com/RzpDQBSNMJ — Dimitri Revolt (@reality_revolt_) April 4, 2026 And we end Part 3 with this one… Check out the guy working on the Astronauts before they left Earth. A literal Satanic head tattooed on his hand! The Satanists sure do love to rub it in your face, don’t they? pic.twitter.com/wKFNFtjIfr — Mr. Nobody (@MmisterNobody) April 4, 2026 They certainly do love rubbing it in our faces. Constantly! And in case you missed it, Parts 1 and 2 down below: Let’s Talk About The Artemis II Moon Launch — Part 2 A big shout out to a reader for catching this one… Fate loves irony, and nowhere is that more true than with names of famous people tied to famous stories — and even tied to alleged psyops. It’s like strange names constantly come up in those situations. I’ll give you a few as examples…. Sam Bankman Fried (FTX/crypto) — famous for running the biggest crypto scam and pyramid scheme in history — “Bankman” literally in his name, and sounds a lot like “Scam Bankman Fraud”. Sam Altman (ChatGPT/OpenAI) — famous for launching ChatGPT and allegedly stealing it from Elon Musk, often known for “shady” character traits — a shady individual literally named the “Altman”. Bernie Madoff (Finance) — famous for running the largest non-crypto Pyramid Scheme — literally named “Madoff” as in he “Made Off” with all the money. Anthony Weiner (Politician) — infamous for penis sex scandals — literally named a word, Weiner, synonymous with penis. Doug Bowser (Nintendo of America president 2019–2025) — literally named the same as the top villain in Nintendo world, ends up running Nintendo. Gary Bowser (notorious Nintendo console hacker sued 2020) – real life hacker, sued by Nintendo, literally named the same as the top villain in Nintendo world. Tito Beveridge (business) — founded Tito’s Vodka — literally named “Beveridge” and runs the largest vodka beverage company. Thomas Matthew Crooks (would-be Trump assassin) — famous for alleged assassination attempt on President Trump — literally named “Crook”. James Alefantis (owner of Comet Ping Pong pizzeria) — infamous for ties to Pizzagate scandal — name sounds exactly like French “J’aime les enfants” (“I love children”). Now go to the biggest story for humanity this week was the launch of the Artemis II, allegedly joyriding around the Moon for a fun little jaunt and then heading home. Earlier today I published my thoughts on all of that here: Let’s Talk About The Artemis II Moon Launch And now credit to a reader who tipped me off that the “Science Reporter” covering the story for PBS was none other than Miles O’Brien. So what, Noah? Well, if you don’t immediately catch the reference, the PBS Science Reporter covering the Rocket Launch heading to the Moon, is named exactly the same as this guy from Star Trek: The Next Generation….THIS is Miles O’Brien, Transporter Chief: Happy Birthday Colm J. Meaney (Irish: Colm Ó Maonaigh) (born 30 May 1953; age 72) is the Irish actor best recognized by Star Trek fans for his portrayal of Chief Miles O'Brien on both Star Trek: The Next Generation and Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. He also played Albert Macklin in… pic.twitter.com/rnqMR05Rid — ミ★ Spocko ★彡 (@spocko_99) May 30, 2025 He continued the character over on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine: the star trek ship of the day is: miles o’brien x keiko o’brien x kira nerys submitted by: anon ‘that pregnancy arc was the perfect segway into a polyamorous relationship’ pic.twitter.com/5IVoLTSklX — star trek ship of the day (@trekshipss) June 15, 2025 And he was married to one of the most annoying characters in the entire Star Trek Universe: Keiko O’Brien. So yeah, as Not A Space Agency errrrrr “NASA” is launching their rockets to the Moon, we get the Transporter Chief, Miles O’Brien covering the story: A day after liftoff, Artemis II is now well on its way. Four astronauts are on a ten-day voyage around the moon and back, traveling deeper into space than any human has ever before.@IAmAmnaNawaz speaks to @milesobrien about what's happening now and what comes next. pic.twitter.com/393KgXuprW — PBS News (@NewsHour) April 2, 2026 You can’t make this stuff up folks! Or who knows, maybe you can…. Meanwhile, in the clip of Miles O’Brien above, he talks about the toilet breaking aboard the vessel, and that got me to thinking….aren’t they in this Orion Capsule in extremely tight quarters for 10 days? I could maybe understand the toilet somehow handling a #1, but how exactly are all 4 of them going to do a #2? You surely can’t just “hold it” for 10 days, can you? Well, I asked Grok and this is what it claims will happen and how you can poop in the midst of 3 other people in a vacuum in Space: Mission Overview The four astronauts on NASA’s Artemis II mission (Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch, and Jeremy Hansen) are inside the Orion spacecraft capsule for the entire ~10-day mission. The mission launched on April 1, 2026, from Kennedy Space Center. It is a crewed lunar flyby (no landing or low lunar orbit), with splashdown planned in the Pacific Ocean off San Diego around April 10–11, 2026 (actual elapsed time is slightly under 10 full days, but NASA rounds it to 10 days). The crew never leaves the Orion capsule from launch to recovery—they live, sleep, eat, work, exercise, and handle all bodily functions in that single vehicle the whole time. Orion’s habitable volume is only about 330 cubic feet (roughly the interior of two minivans or SUVs packed with equipment), so it is extremely cramped for four people over ~10 days. They coordinate tightly on everything, including bathroom use. The Toilet: Not “Only for Peeing” Your understanding is close but not quite right—the Artemis II Orion has a full toilet system capable of handling both urine and feces (unlike the Apollo-era missions, which used plastic bags taped to the body for everything). It is called the Universal Waste Management System (UWMS), a compact, vacuum/airflow-based toilet that is a major upgrade for deep-space missions. It is installed in a dedicated “hygiene bay” built into the floor of the capsule (next to the crew hatch). The bay has: A door (plus optional privacy curtain): Crew members have described it as “the one place… we can actually feel like we’re alone for a moment.” It is the closest thing to privacy they get on the whole mission. Space: Roughly the size of an airplane bathroom (still tight, but functional). Stability: Handrails/handles and foot restraints/tethers so astronauts can stay seated and stable in microgravity. Environment: Bright orange insulation foam on the walls (for thermal/structural reasons), and it is noticeably loud because of the fans—astronauts wear ear protection while using it. How pooping and peeing actually work (step by step): The astronaut opens the floor hatch/door, climbs in, and secures themselves with the foot restraints and handholds. For urine: Each crew member has their own personal funnel (redesigned to work for both men and women). They attach it to a hose. A fan creates airflow that pulls the urine away from the body into the system. Urine is pre-treated and stored briefly, then vented overboard into space once per day (no water recycling on this short mission, unlike the ISS). For feces: They sit on the toilet seat. Airflow (from the same dual-fan separator system) pulls the solid waste away from the body and into individual fecal collection bags. These bags go into a sealed canister that holds about 20 deposits, with filters to control odor and gas buildup. The canister is swapped out as needed during the mission and stowed for return to Earth (it is not dumped in space). The system is designed so urination and defecation can happen simultaneously if needed. After use, they clean up with wipes/tissues (personal hygiene kits are provided), seal everything, and close the hatch. Waste is fully contained—no floating debris. They do not just “hold it.” The toilet is used normally as needed throughout the 10 days. It was specifically built to address astronaut feedback from earlier missions about comfort, hygiene, and dignity. What About the Brief Toilet Issue Early in the Mission? Shortly after launch on April 1–2, there was a temporary controller/fan issue with the urine-collection part of the system (it wouldn’t boot properly). The crew and ground teams troubleshot it successfully within about a day and restored full function. Even while the urine fan was down, the fecal-collection side still worked normally, and they had backup collapsible contingency urinal bags (Apollo-style) for urine if needed. The issue did not affect the overall mission. Bottom Line The UWMS gives the Artemis II crew a real toilet with actual privacy (door + location in the floor), simultaneous pee/poop capability, and proper containment—huge step up from the old bag-and-tape method. Everything is stored or vented responsibly, and the crew returns with the solid waste. No one is holding it; they just coordinate who uses the hygiene bay when, like roommates in a very small apartment. The system was tested extensively on the ISS and in Orion mockups, and the crew has reported it works well. RELATED REPORT: Let’s Talk About The Artemis II Moon Launch Ok, it’s time to address the NASA Artemis II Moon Mission… Are we really going back to the Moon for the first time in over 50 years? Longtime readers of WLT Report will know I am highly skeptical of that claim. But what about the Artemis II?  Doesn’t this prove the Moon missions are real?  See, we’re going back right now, it’s really happening! Ehhh, I’m not so sure. But let’s take a look at what new information we have now that we do have the new Artemis II launch. We can start with this….a hallmark of NASA launches is with each new launch we get the obligatory new photo of the Earth. And here’s the newest 2026 version: BREAKING: Artemis II crew captures new photo of Earth. pic.twitter.com/E0YgYcIhW7 — Polymarket (@Polymarket) April 3, 2026 Incredible right? To see our home planet from Space? It would be if it were real, sure! But how do we know this one is real this time when each new one we get always looks so different? Let me show you what I mean… Here are 8 images NASA has told us it took of the Earth. Will the real Earth please stand up? Not only do those 8 not look like each other, but none of them resemble the new image was just got from Artemis II. Strange, don’t you think? And take another look at the 2026 image….you can see the large brown land mass in the bottom left area seems to be Australia, right? But then look again and look specifically at its size. Australia looks MASSIVE! This guy did a great job explaining exactly how Australia could not possibly be that big when viewed from Space: I'm not a flat earther butThe size of Australia in the recent picture of Earth from the Artemis to rocket does not match the Google maps ball which does fit all the continents and is very accurate when it comes to proportion. https://t.co/JNBQkLcUk4 pic.twitter.com/xrnY1UsXpQ — Matt Baker (@slave_2_liberty) April 3, 2026 Gotta love how he prefaces his post with “I’m not a Flat-Earther but….” I think we’re going to start seeing people say that a lot more often going forward. They don’t want people to think they’re crazy so “I’m not a Flat-Earther” but….I can also see that things are not adding up here.  What they are telling us is true is not what I am seeing. Backup of that video here on Rumble if needed: And then we always have this beauty… If you’ve ever watched a rocket launch, you know it always follows this pattern. It goes up, then hits a peak, and then seemingly starts going down again. It looks like this: …any questions? pic.twitter.com/8jiPn93Swp — ▄︻デʀօɮօȶ քօʟɨֆɦɛʀ═══━一 (@RobotPolisher) April 3, 2026 I know, I know….it can’t go straight up because it has to kind of go sideways and build up escape velocity kind of like how you can’t swim directly against a rip tide current in the Ocean, you have to kind of swim mostly parallel to it. I’ve heard it all before, and maybe that’s right. But I also know my eyes see. Here’s the Artemis II launch, filmed by a man with a Nikon P1000: I'm tired of talking about this, but there are still people out there who believe this Artemis II crap, so we need to keep driving the point home: There is no "space travel". NASA is a computer-generation and filming studio that occasionally does public spectacles like this to… https://t.co/j4ets4PaQX pic.twitter.com/Jkc1laVnic — ₿en Wehrman (@benwehrman) April 3, 2026 Then we have the Astronauts before the launch, and I’m not saying there’s any big smoking gun here but they just seem “off” to me and they seem to be making some really strange comments. Watch here: A lot of weird things were said by these astronauts! Wow! pic.twitter.com/8siy33czQd — Freedom Memes (@FreedomMemesIRL) April 2, 2026 I don’t know, they sure seem a lot more like polished actors than Space Astronauts, but maybe that’s just me. Speaking of the Astronauts, am I the only person who thinks this looks totally staged and fake? BOOM: The astronauts are SUITING UP right now for the launch of Artemis II to the Moon from Kennedy Space Center! This is HISTORIC! Pray for our astronauts! pic.twitter.com/k9o7J3Nudz — Gunther Eagleman (@GuntherEagleman) April 1, 2026 So they have to through this ridiculous process of suiting up for hours before the leave but what about the return trip home? What about when they’re in Space and have to change outfits to go pee? Who suits them back up like this for the return trip? Here they are allegedly in Space right now just hanging out, not in their gear anymore, so I ask again who suits them up for the return trip home? NEW: Artemis 2 crew explains the difficulty of sleeping during their mission to the Moon. Question: “What does sleeping even look like?” Answer: “It’s actually sorta comical. Christina has been sleeping heads down in the middle of the vehicle, kinda like a bat suspended from… pic.twitter.com/2wBCtzyh6X — Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) April 3, 2026 Or how about this….is this Buzz Aldrin admitting flat out that we never went to the Moon? Watch here: Buzz Aldrin looks like he always told you we didn’t go to the Moon, didn’t he? Little girl: “Why has nobody been to the Moon in such a long time?” Buzz: “Because we didn’t go there.” pic.twitter.com/xbKa1N9sRV — Mr. Nobody (@MmisterNobody) April 2, 2026 And then there’s the fact that we can never get an uncut, live feed of the entire launch from Earth to Space. Go search, you won’t find one. Every single video you will find has multiple cuts in it. We never get to see the full thing, unedited. Wonder why that is? And then we just have the practical questions that don’t add up. I still find it impossible to believe that we went to the Moon from 1969-1972 and then just stopped going. For over 50 years, we just never bothered to go back. That would be like discovering North America and then Europe deciding they didn’t really have any interest in exploring it, colonizing it, and expanding their empires. Folks, that has NEVER happened ever in the history of humanity that we reached a new place, a new discovery, and then just chose to not go there anymore. Of course, NASA’s Don Pettit explains that the real problem is NASA “lost” the technology. No joke, watch here: NASA “lost the technology” to go back to the moon. What do you all make of this? Do you believe that story? Credit IG Account: Mindsetofresistance pic.twitter.com/nYJRWmjAzL — HighTower (@F_A_N_G) March 4, 2026 Look, I’ve lost my car keys, I’ve lost my homework, I even once lost my little sister for a few hours, but you’re telling me that an entire Government Agency with Billions of dollars in budget each year just lost the technology for the most important achievement of mankind? Really? What, like you taped over the VHS tapes? Didn’t run the computer backup? Misplaced the files in your filing cabinet? You expect me to believe this? There’s also the fact that technology never moves backwards. We somehow figured this out back in 1969 and got it right on the very first try too, but now 55 years later we cannot reproduce it? You do realize Artemis II is not actually landing on the Moon, right? Isn’t that a little weird? They’re just going to go joyride around it and then come home, but not actually land on it. Why? Because NASA is literally not capable of doing that right now. In 55 years, we someone regressed in technology. Can anyone explain that? It would be like this….imagine right now you have your iPhone 17, super powerful, we have AI chatbots that can literally answer any question you ask it, our Teslas drive us automatically anywhere we want to go without touching the wheel or pedals, it’s all pretty wild.  But then imagine we jump forward to 2076, 50 years in the future, and you look around and for some reason the best anyone has is that old Nokia brick phone, no AI chatbots, and the cars have all gone back to 1970s era cars. Would that make any sense? Of course not! But that’s what we’re told we have to believe about NASA and Space exploration. Sorry folks, I just don’t buy it. And neither does my man Bart Sibrel. A few years ago, I had him on my show over on The Daily Truth Report and it was an incredible chat where we went deep on all of this stuff. If you haven’t seen it yet, you’re in for a real treat: MOON MAN: Bart Sibrel EXPOSES The Moon Landings A couple days ago I had the pleasure of getting to sit down with someone who I’ve followed for a long time. One of the first people to speak out and say the Moon Landings don’t add up…. One of the ONLY people in the world to get punched in the face by Buzz Aldrin…. And one of the best filmmakers out there. I sat down with Mr. Bart Sibrel and we chatted for over an hour. The time totally flew by, and I had about 20 additional questions for him that we just didn’t have time to get to. After we had wrapped the interview, Bart commented to me that this interview flew by faster than any others he can remember doing recently, and I felt the same way. Whether you are a NASA fanboy or a Moon Landing skeptic, I think you’re going to enjoy this one. There’s a very real “cult of religion” surrounding the Moon Landings and so I know this is going to really ruffle some feathers. But it must be discussed because the truth will always rise to the top. In fact, Bart told me on air that he once came across a professor who said “even if I see Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong get on TV and confess to the world that the Moon Landings were fake, I will still believe they were true!” Hard to imagine anything more “cultish” and “brainwashed” than that statement, but I know we’ll get some of that in the comments below. Nevertheless, I am talking about this and I had Bart on my show because I believe this is one of the largest conspiracies ever to be covered up. And you do know that “conspiracy theories” are only “conspiracy” until they are admitted or proven as true, right? And you do know that MANY have moved from “conspiracy theory” to “proven fact” in the last century, right? In fact, I recently asked ChatGPT to give me a top 10 list and you might be surprised to see this list of 10 events that were once considered “tin foil hat” conspiracy theories are all now either proven or admitted to be 100% true: The Tuskegee Syphilis Study (1932-1972): The U.S. Public Health Service conducted an experiment on African American men in Tuskegee, Alabama, allowing syphilis to progress untreated to study its natural history, even after the discovery of penicillin as a cure. Operation Northwoods (1962): This was a proposed plan by the U.S. Department of Defense to stage false flag acts of terrorism and blame them on Cuba to justify military intervention. The operation was never approved or carried out. MKUltra (1953-1973): The CIA ran secret mind-control experiments using drugs like LSD, hypnosis, and more on unsuspecting subjects, including U.S. and Canadian citizens. Operation Paperclip (1945-1959): After WWII, the U.S. government secretly recruited former Nazi scientists, engineers, and technicians, providing them with new identities to benefit from their expertise in various fields. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident (1964): Originally presented as an unprovoked attack on U.S. naval vessels by North Vietnamese forces, further analysis and declassified information showed that the event was misrepresented, leading to the escalation of the Vietnam War. COINTELPRO (1956-1971): The FBI’s program aimed to surveil, infiltrate, and discredit civil rights and political organizations and their leaders. Operation Gladio: Post-WWII, NATO-backed secret armies were allegedly involved in terror and provocation operations to discredit leftist groups and stabilize political situations in Europe. The Iran-Contra Affair (1980s): Senior U.S. officials secretly facilitated the sale of arms to Iran, which was then under an arms embargo, and used the proceeds to fund Contra rebels in Nicaragua, violating U.S. law. The poisoning of alcohol during Prohibition (1920-1933): The U.S. government knowingly allowed the poisoning of industrial alcohols, which bootleggers used to produce drinkable spirits. This led to thousands of deaths. Operation CHAOS (1967-1974): A covert CIA program to monitor and infiltrate anti-Vietnam War and civil rights groups in the U.S., despite prohibitions against domestic spying. So now let’s talk Moon Landings…. Does that get moved to #1 on the list above at some point in the near future? I think it might. When it comes to the Moon Landings, I want to start with something Bart and I discussed….which is the fact that for everyone who thinks the Moon Landings were real, all the doubters used to be you! We used to be you…. We all grew up hearing about the Moon Landings, looking up at Space and thinking how cool it was that we’d been to the Moon…. A lot of us had the posters on our wall growing up…. We had the Globe in every elementary school classroom growing up and we were taught about the Moon Landings every year in school. We watched Star Trek and Star Wars and we loved it! We honored and revered the Astroanuts. We. Were. You! But then “A Funny Thing Happened”…. I’ll just speak to my situation, but I think this is how it goes for most people. I started hearing about how there was this group of people who said it never happened. “INSANE!” we all thought! But then eventually you decide, ok so what is going on here? It’s so strange, how could they think that? And then you go down the Rabbit Hole into Wonderland and once you start digging in you realize, hang on, some of this actually doesn’t make any sense! And once you hit that point you often never go back. It’s the famous quote: “There is a principle which is a bar against all information, which is proof against all arguments and which cannot fail to keep a man in everlasting ignorance – that principle is contempt prior to investigation.” The people who remain in contempt — holding all doubters in consternation — never investigate. And according to that quote, “contempt prior to investigation” is a bar against all information, leaving man in everlasting ignorance. So if that’s you, I challenge you to simply….investigate! And when you start investigating, you’re going to come across two different categories of information. The first category are what I call the micro-details. This is stuff like the shadows in the images are all wrong, the flag is not blowing right, there is a lack of stars, one rock has a “C” on it so it looks like it was a movie prop, the dirt is the wrong color, etc. There is a LOT of evidence in that camp, but that was never conclusive to me. Every piece of evidence has a counterargument and you can get mired in that back-and-forth all day long. It’s really the second category that seals the deal for me, which is what I call the logical proofs. And the logical proof is simply this — without any special training, any tests, any evidence of any kind — you just simply need your brain and logic, and in order to believe we landed on the Moon in 1969-72, you have to believe the following: In order to believe we landed on the moon in 1969 you have to believe this simple claim: That we went 1,000 times FARTHER than we can currently send astronauts today… 50 years ago… On the first attempt… With one-millionth the computing power of today’s cell phone! And then the kicker…..then we just never went back! Each one of those elements has never happened before in human history, let alone all of them at the same time. Let’s break those down… Currently, even by NASA’s own admissions, we cannot send human beings any farther than Low Earth Orbit (where the Space Station is) — yet, in 1969 we went to the Moon which is 1,000 times farther.  Really? That was 50 years ago, and so we could do it back then but can’t do it now. So technology went backwards? That would be like having the Internet in 2023 and then in 2073 the Internet is gone and we’re back to computers with no online connection and we’re back to using floppy disks. Technology has never gone backwards like that, ever. For all the visual learners, this: Watch this stunning clip here: Then you have to believe we did it perfectly on the first try! Amazing! Oh and we vertically landed the rocket on the Moon, meanwhile, it took Elon Musk 5 tries to vertically land a rocket in 2023.  They all kept blowing up! But we did it perfect, on the first try, thousands of miles away from Earth. With…..less computing power than we all currently walk around with on our cell phones. Think of that. NASA had ONE-MILLIONTH the computing power of our current cell phones. I can’t even get the WiFi to work in my house half the time, meanwhile, with 1/1,000,0000th the computing power, we remotely landed a rocket on the Moon?  And then packed it up and flew it back home again?  Really? And then the big one…. After all that, we went back a couple times in the 1969-72 range and then we just never went back again for over 50 years and counting. Really? That has also never happened in human history. That’s like discovering America in 1492 and then never going back again. Just decided to let it be! That ONLY happens if you CAN’T go back again, not because you choose not to. So to me, it’s this logical argument that catches my attention and says something is wrong here, something is very, very wrong here…. And with that, please enjoy my interview with Bart Sibrel, where we go much deeper on all of this. Watch safely here on Rumble: And on YouTube here: If you want more, you need to get Bart’s book, “Moon Man”. Bart’s book, plus a TON of free resources are all available at his website

Grindr, the popular LGBTQ dating and online hookup app, will host its inaugural “White House Correspondents’ Dinner Weekend Party” on April 24. The dinner party joins a crowded group of events ahead of the annual White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) dinner on April 25. Axios reporter Andrew Solender shared a flyer to the event. “A Friday evening gathering bringing together leaders across government, media, and the LGTBQ community as we toast the First Amendment,” the flyer read. You, a fool: “surely DC couldn't host an event gayer than the Heated Rivalry lookalike contest!!” Grindr: "hold my beer" pic.twitter.com/koGWgXlrTK — Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) April 7, 2026 The Hill shared further: In an interview last year, Grindr CEO George Arison said the dating app aimed to be a “place that is welcoming to everybody” regardless of political affiliation. “No matter what their political views are, people who are gay should be welcome on Grindr and we want them to have a really good experience,” Arison said at the time, confirming reports that there was a “significant spike in usage” on the app in Milwaukee during the Republican National Convention in 2024. After bucking tradition and shunning the correspondents’ dinner throughout his first term in office, President Trump said in March that he planned to attend this year’s gala at the Washington Hilton hotel. “Grindr represents a global community with real stakes in Washington. The issues being debated here — HIV funding, privacy and online safety, LGBTQ+ family rights — are daily life for our community,” said Joe Hack, Grindr’s head of global government affairs, according to the outlet. “Nobody does connections like Grindr, and WHCD weekend is the most iconic place in the country to make them. We figured it was time to host,” Hack added. Trump is set to attend the WHCA dinner for the first time as president. “The White House Correspondents Association has asked me, very nicely, to be the Honoree at this year’s Dinner, a long and storied tradition since it began in 1924, under then President Calvin Coolidge,” Trump said earlier this year. “Trump announces he WILL be going to the White House Correspondents Dinner this year, after declining every other year. The 2011 dinner, where Obama tried roasting him, is reportedly what SOLIDIFIED Trump’s decision to run for President. Trump got the last laugh,” journalist Nick Sortor wrote last month. JUST IN: Trump announces he WILL be going to the White House Correspondents Dinner this year, after declining every other year The 2011 dinner, where Obama tried roasting him, is reportedly what SOLIDIFIED Trump’s decision to run for President. Trump got the last laugh pic.twitter.com/WV3tzvS5U8 — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 2, 2026 More from the Associated Press: Trump was invited annually, but never attended the dinner during his first term and also skipped last year’s gathering. “For more than 100 years, the journalists of the White House Correspondents’ Association have enjoyed an evening with the president,” the association’s president, Weijia Jiang, said in a statement. “We’re happy the president has accepted our invitation and look forward to hosting him.” The event was canceled due to the coronavirus pandemic in 2020 and 2021, but President Joe Biden attended each of the dinners during his term’s final three years. Every president since Coolidge had attended except Trump — until now. In his post Trump wrote that, “Because the Press was extraordinarily bad to me” he had “boycotted the event, and never went.” “However, I look forward to being with everyone this year. Hopefully, it will be something very Special.” The correspondents’ dinner debuted in 1921. Three years later, Coolidge became the first president to attend. While all presidents but Trump went, not all did every year of their terms. Jimmy Carter and Richard Nixon opted not to, and Ronald Reagan — then recovering from an assassination attempt — missed the 1981 installment, but called in from Camp David. Trump attended the correspondents dinner before he was president, and was the subject of mocking by then-President Barack Obama in 2011. Obama joked: “Say what you will about Mr. Trump, he certainly would bring some change to the White House. Let’s see what we’ve got up there.”

The Justice Department announced the arrest of a former Army employee for her “alleged transmission of classified national defense information to individuals not authorized to receive it.” The FBI arrested Courtney Williams, 40, of Wagram, North Carolina. Williams allegedly leaked classified information to a journalist. More below: HOLY CRAP! The FBI has arrested former US Special Operations and DELTA FORCE veteran Courtney Williams for violating the ESPIONAGE ACT DOJ says she transmitted classified national defense intel to the media and put our warfighters at risk This sends a message to leakers!… pic.twitter.com/jOPWGIwYug — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 8, 2026 CNN shared further: Courtney Williams worked in a Special Military Unit from 2010 to 2016 and had top secret clearance with access to a significant amount of classified material, charging documents say. Federal prosecutors allege that from 2022 to 2025, Williams shared classified information that the journalist used in reporting for an article and book on Fort Bragg. While court records do not name the journalist, a book “The Fort Bragg Cartel” and magazine article from independent reporter Seth Harp last year, profiles Williams and her allegations of harassment and abuse while employed at Fort Bragg. With scant details, charging documents allege that information shared by Williams to the reporter included classified information she was not allowed to provide. CNN is attempting to contact Williams’ attorney. Harp’s article details the significant sexual and race-based harassment Williams says she saw and, at times, experienced during her work at the North Carolina army base. “Clearance holders accept a solemn obligation to protect the classified information entrusted to them,” said Assistant Attorney General for National Security John A. Eisenberg. “That they do so is critical to the security of our Nation. When clearance holders violate that trust, the National Security Division will act swiftly to hold them accountable,” Eisenberg continued. “We trust our war fighting individuals to cooperate as a team to protect our military and country,” said U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of North Carolina Ellis Boyle. “We will pursue criminal charges to keep these warriors safe whenever we find leakers exalting their own feelings over the safety of the United States,” Boyle added. In a statement, Harp called Williams a “brave and patriotic truth-teller who has committed no crime.” Statement on the arrest of Courtney Williams, a brave and patriotic truth-teller who has committed no crime and, if there is any justice in the world, will soon be free from the clutches of Trump's rogue DOJ pic.twitter.com/NZblU0xmwb — Seth Harp (@sethharpesq) April 8, 2026 More from the Justice Department: As alleged, between 2022 and 2025, Williams repeatedly communicated with the Journalist via telephone and text messages. During this period, Williams and the Journalist had over 10 hours of telephone calls and exchanged more than 180 messages. In one such message, the Journalist identified themselves as a journalist and stated that they sought information about the SMU in support of an upcoming article and book. After these communications with Williams, the Journalist published a book and article that named Williams as a source and attributed specific statements to her. Some of these statements contained classified national defense information. In addition to her disclosures to the Journalist, Williams also made unauthorized disclosures of national defense information via her social media accounts. On the day the article and book were published, Williams exchanged several messages with the Journalist. In one such message, Williams stated that she was “concerned about the amount of classified information being disclosed.” In a separate message to a third party, Williams added that, “I might actually get arrested . . . for disclosing classified information.” In a subsequent message, Williams citied a statutory provision of the Espionage Act. And when asked how she knew that she may face legal consequences for her disclosures to the Journalist, Williams responded, “I have known my entire career,” adding that “they tell you everyday . . . 100 times a day.” Finally, in a message to a different third party, Williams stated that she was “probably going to jail for life.”