100percentfedup.com
Supreme Court Upholds Controversial Red State Age Verification Law, For Now
The Supreme Court on Monday allowed Texas to enforce, at least for now, a law that requires app stores to verify users’ ages and for minors to obtain parental consent before downloading apps or making in-app purchases.
“In a pair of brief, unsigned orders issued on Monday afternoon, the justices turned down requests to reinstate orders by a federal judge in Austin that barred the state from implementing the law,” SCOTUSblog reports.
“There were no public dissents from the orders,” it added.
The Supreme Court allowed Texas to continue enforcing its App Store Accountability Act, which requires age verification and parental consent before minors can download apps or make in-app purchases. pic.twitter.com/bwMCuioxm8
— SCOTUS Wire (@scotus_wire) July 6, 2026
SCOTUSblog explained further:
The law at the center of the dispute is the Texas App Store Accountability Act, also known as SB 2420. There are two separate sets of challengers in the case. The first set, led by a group known as Students Engaged in Advancing Texas, which says that its members “use mobile apps to teach other kids how to get involved in policymaking,” went to federal court last October to challenge the law before it could go into effect on Jan. 1, 2026. The second challenger, the Computer and Communications Industry Association, a trade group that represents (among others) app stores and app developers, filed a similar challenge the same day. In both cases, the challengers argue (among other things) that SB 2420 violates the First Amendment.
U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman issued an order in December that temporarily blocked the state from enforcing SB 2420. But last month, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit put Pitman’s orders on hold, prompting the challengers to come to the Supreme Court a few days later.
In their filing asking the Supreme Court to reinstate Pitman’s orders, the students told the justices that the 5th Circuit’s decision “would render virtually the entire internet—not to mention the distribution of every book, newspaper, magazine, movie, or record album—‘commercial speech’ the government could more readily ban, restrict, edit, or compel. That is clearly wrong.” Moreover, they noted, Texas already shields children from accessing adult content online, in a separate law that the Supreme Court upheld last year. Therefore, the students said, SB 2420’s stated goal of protecting them “from ‘accessing harmful or inappropriate content’ … is not a valid government interest.”
In its own brief, the CCIA argued that the 5th Circuit’s decision “has upset the status quo by allowing the Act to be enforced for the first time, exposing app stores and millions of app developers to potential liability” and subjecting them to “enormous and unrecoverable compliance costs.” And in any event, the group added, the app stores that the CCIA’s members operate already “provide various, voluntary tools that enable parents to control their children’s exposure to apps and content.”
When Gov. Greg Abbott signed the bill into law in May 2025, Texas became the second state to pass an age-verification law.
Republican Governor Signs Bill Requiring Age Verification To Download Apps
Critics said the bill essentially mandates digital ID to access apps.
“In Texas, Apple and Google will now be the bouncers at the front door of the internet, checking IDs for every app download,” Reclaim The Net wrote last year.
In Texas, Apple and Google will now be the bouncers at the front door of the internet, checking IDs for every app download.https://t.co/81ONgZUwxX
— Reclaim The Net (@ReclaimTheNetHQ) May 29, 2025
Opponents of the bill also cited the attack on privacy and online anonymity by requiring verification of an individual’s identity with their digital presence.
Attorney Tom Renz called it "Digital Track & Trace in disguise."
Watch below:
App Store Accountability Act = Digital Track & Trace in disguise.
They define “personal data” as anything linked or reasonably linkable to your kid, including pseudonymous data they can reconnect.
But they exclude de-identified and publicly available data.
That’s the lie.… pic.twitter.com/tAXJLvwFAY
— Tom Renz (@RenzTom) July 7, 2026
More from the Associated Press:
Plaintiffs’ lawyers argued that the law impermissibly seeks to limit access to content protected by the First Amendment, including news and educational material.
“Equity and the public interest support relief because protecting First Amendment rights — and parents’ rights to supervise their children as they see fit, not as the government tells them they should — is always in the public interest,” wrote attorneys for Students Engaged in Advancing Texas.
Attorneys from Paxton’s office argued that the law protects children from “dangerous modern products.”
“A child with access to an app store and a mobile device (such as a tablet or smartphone) can potentially download any number of software applications, potentially agreeing to invasions of the child’s privacy and sale of the child’s data and be exposed to any conceivable content without parental consent or even parental knowledge,” they wrote.
The post Supreme Court Upholds Controversial Red State Age Verification Law, For Now appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.