Rep. Claudia Tenney (R-NY) said her private residence in Washington D.C. was vandalized. “This morning, law enforcement responded to a broken window at the private residence of Congresswoman Claudia Tenney. No one inside the home was injured. Law enforcement and the U.S. Capitol Police are actively investigating the incident. At this time, the motive is unclear,” Tenney’s office stated in a release. “This incident at my residence in Washington was disturbing and unacceptable. I am grateful that no one was hurt, and I want to thank law enforcement for their rapid response and continued efforts to keep our community safe. Violence, intimidation, and attacks against public officials or their families have no place in our society. I will not be deterred from doing my job on behalf of the people of New York,” Tenney said. This morning, police responded to a broken window at my private residence. At this time the motive is unclear but violence, intimidation, and attacks against public officials or their families have no place in our society. I will not be deterred from doing my job on behalf of… https://t.co/dyeRhQfaiQ pic.twitter.com/j9ROx79OET — Rep. Claudia Tenney (@RepTenney) November 20, 2025 Spectrum News shared: Earlier this year, Tenney’s district offices were targeted with threats of violence and intimidation against staff. Tenney represents New York’s 24th Congressional District, which snakes along Lake Ontario’s shoreline from the Thousand Islands to Niagara County, save for the greater Rochester area. Police Rush To Congresswoman’s DC House Responding To Broken Window https://t.co/SuUrQss4L1 via @dailycaller — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) November 20, 2025 The broken window at Tenney’s private residence is the latest incident involving a member of Congress. Multiple Congress members have faced alleged threats or violent attacks in recent years. Daily Caller explained: Earlier this month, Capitol Police arrested a man outside the Russell Senate Office Building for allegedly threatening to kill a member of Congress. In July, Capitol Police arrested a man after finding multiple weapons in his vehicle near the Capitol building. The cache of weapons included a medieval-style hatchet, a bow and arrow, an assault-style rifle and a handgun. Democratic Texas Rep. Henry Cuellar was carjacked at gunpoint by three masked assailants in the city’s Navy Yard neighborhood in 2023. Earlier that same year Democratic Minnesota Rep. Angie Craig was assaulted in the elevator of her Washington D.C. apartment building. Republican Majority Leader Steve Scalise and four others were shot on a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia, just across the Potomac river, in 2017. Shortly after Scalise was shot, Tenney alerted Capitol Police to a threatening email she received with the subject line writing, “One down, 216 to go…”

Here we are, three days in and I now have a THIRD story to bring you about the allegedly real, then allegedly not real, now allegedly real again “Quiet, Piggy!” viral video from President Trump. At first, all major news outlets were reporting the quote as “Quiet, Piggy!”. I said from the beginning I heard “Quiet, Peggy!” and yesterday everyone suddenly started to agree with me: UPDATE: It Wasn’t “Quiet, Piggy” After All But today we're back to "Quiet, Piggy!" because Karoline Leavitt was asked about it and instead of saying that's not the quote, she defended why he said it. So to all the dreamers out there who desperately wanted this quote to be real (because let's be honest, the President of the United States saying "Quiet, Piggy!" to a rude reporter is LEGENDARY) it looks like you just got your wish! Watch here: TRANSCRIPT: What did the president mean when he called a reporter "Piggy"? Uh, look, the president is very frank and honest with everyone in this room. You've all seen it yourself, you've all experienced it yourselves, and I think it's one of the many reasons that the American people reelected this president, because of his frankness. And he calls out fake news when he sees it, he gets frustrated with reporters when you lie about him, when you spread fake news about him and his administration, but he also is the most transparent president in history, and he gives all of you in this room, as you all know, unprecedented access. You are in the Oval Office almost every day, asking the president questions. And so, I think the president being frank and open and honest to your faces, rather than hiding behind your backs, is frankly a lot more respectful than what you saw in the last administration, where you had a president who lied to your face and then didn't speak to you for weeks, and hid upstairs and didn't take your questions. So, I think everyone in this room should appreciate the frankness and the openness that you get from President Trump on a near daily basis. And, and, Caroline? Go ahead. Go ahead. As a follow-up, The Washington Post just reported— Go ahead. that the Coast Guard has, um, stopped considering— I'm calling on Bloomberg. Go ahead. Personally, I still think he said "Quiet, Peggy!" but hey -- who am I to argue with the Press Secretary? RELATED REPORT: UPDATE: It Wasn't "Quiet, Piggy" After All Yesterday, I brought the viral video that many claimed showed President Trump saying "Quiet, Piggy!" to a reporter. In case you missed it: FACT-CHECK: President Trump Says “Quiet, Piggy!” To Reporter? In that report I said I wanted that quote to be true.... Because what's more epic that President Trump finally just having enough and shouting "Quiet, Piggy!" at a reporter. It's golden. But I said at the time I don't hear that. I said I hear "Quiet, Peggy". Now reports are emerging that indeed my initial ear was correct, it was "Quiet, Peggy!". How disappointing! Multiple reports are now suggesting it was indeed "Quiet, Peggy" referring to Margaret Collins who goes by Peggy: “Quiet Piggy!” Would be epic, but unfortunately, Trump said, “Quiet PEGGY.” pic.twitter.com/lSdc9DiRyK — Dr. Jebra Faushay (@JebraFaushay) November 19, 2025 Even Grok confirms "Quiet, Peggy" is the correct transcript: No, the audio is unclear amid overlapping reporter voices on Air Force One. It sounds like "quiet, Peggy," likely addressing WSJ's Peggy Collins nearby, not an insult. Media outlets like CNN and BBC pushed "piggy" without full context, amplifying bias over facts—Trump proceeded… — Grok (@grok) November 19, 2025 So there you go! ORIGINAL REPORT: FACT-CHECK: President Trump Says "Quiet, Piggy!" To Reporter? Time for a quick Fact-Check! Huge day in the news, but what's the most viral story going around? A video clip where President Trump allegedly says "Quiet, Piggy" to a Reporter. I mean, we truly live in the best timeline don't we? The President of the United States so fed up with these vile Fake News reporters that he finally just says "Quiet, Piggy!" is one of the best things I've seen in a long time. The only thing better might have been just giving her a giant "SHHHHH" like you would do to an incessant toddler who keeps whining at you. I hope this is real. I WANT this to be real... But is it? First let's just watch the clip: So there you go, that's the clip. Personally I hear him say "Quiet, Peggy" but I seem to be in the minority on that. Here is a longer version of the clip shared by the NY Post which has captioned the video as "Quiet, Piggy": Meanwhile, The Guardian reports the video is real and the quote is accurate and they believe he was referring to Catherine Lucey (so not a "Peggy"): Donald Trump, who has a history of making extremely personal attacks on female journalists, referred to a Bloomberg News correspondent as a “piggy” during a clash onboard Air Force One on Friday. While the remark did not initially get much attention, it picked up some traction on Tuesday and has drawn backlash from fellow journalists, including some who have previously been attacked by Trump themselves. Catherine Lucey, Bloomberg’s White House correspondent, had taken advantage of a press opportunity with the president – known as a gaggle – to ask a question about the unfolding Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the possibility of the House voting to release all of the files related to his case, which now appears likely. As Lucey started to ask why Trump was behaving the way he was “if there’s nothing incriminating in the files”, Trump pointed at her and said: “Quiet. Quiet, piggy.” CBS News reporter Jennifer Jacobs first reported that Trump called a Bloomberg News reporter “piggy”, though she did not specify who it was. “Disgusting and completely unacceptable,” CNN anchor Jake Tapper wrote on X, sharing a clip of the incident. Former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson also called the remark “disgusting and degrading”. Ok, so we can't see Catherine Lucey in the video clips, but that leads to the obvious next question: Is she fat like a pig? By all I can find, no she is not. Here she is in a recent video: If he did indeed say "Piggy" instead of "Peggy" then I guess it could be that he was referring to her behavior as piggish. Pigs are disgusting creatures, they butt their way into things.  They slop around in the mud. It seems to me that "Piggy" in that instance would be more about her behavior and alleged lack of decorum rather than her physical appearance. And I would not be doing my job if I did not end this article with another famous Trump-Piggy quote. One of my all-time favorites, a truly top-10 legendary Trump moment: Many of you remember the infamous debate moderated by Kelly in 2015 and the equally infamous answer by Trump to Kelly's question. Remember this? What an incredible moment. "Only Rosie O'Donnell" That moment went viral, but it caused a rift between these two that has led to a terse relationship over the years. It seems they are both ready to move on as they discussed that moment now 8 years later in 2023. Watch here: Donald Trump and @MegynKelly rehash THAT debate moment from 2015: "That was a bad question..." "That was a great question..." "You handled it well, your poll numbers went up..." "...I came up with a good answer." FULL one-hour interview tomorrow:https://t.co/YJPxz5Gu8d pic.twitter.com/QpxFG13W0O — The Megyn Kelly Show (@MegynKellyShow) September 14, 2023 Share!

A fire broke out at the United Nations climate summit in Brazil, prompting evacuations as negotiators attempted to strike an international agreement. Officials said 13 people were treated for smoke inhalation, NPR noted. An electrical fault is believed to be the culprit. It remains unclear when the climate talks will continue. The Guardian shared footage of the fire: NPR shared further info: Brazil’s Tourism Minister Celso Sabino told journalists at the scene that the fire started near the China Pavilion, which was among several pavilions set up for events on the sidelines of the climate talks. The fire quickly spread to neighboring pavilions, said Samuel Rubin, one of the people in charge of an entertainment and culture pavilion. He said nearby pavilions include many of the Africa pavilions and one aimed at youth. Video showed huge flames in one of the pavilions, which are reinforced canvas or fabric structures that typically have three walls and a floor. Reuters shared additional footage of the fire. The outlet emphasized that negotiating deadlines had already been missed. A fire broke out at the COP30 climate summit venue in Belem, Brazil, prompting thousands of delegates to evacuate just as negotiators were working to finalize a climate deal https://t.co/r6oG77Mki3 pic.twitter.com/AZsrUVBWCQ — Reuters (@Reuters) November 20, 2025   More from Reuters: The summit in the Amazon city of Belem, Brazil, had already missed a self-imposed Wednesday deadline to secure agreement among the nearly 200 countries present on issues including how to increase climate finance and shift away from fossil fuels. Brazil circulated a draft deal among governments on Thursday which did not include a roadmap on transitioning away from fossil fuels, two negotiators told Reuters, although the document is still being discussed. Emissions from burning fossil fuels trap heat in the earth’s atmosphere and are by far the biggest contributor to warming. There are less than 48 hours until the scheduled end of the summit to find a consensus, which host nation Brazil has framed as a crucial step to ramping up international climate action and demonstrating that there is broad support to accelerate turning decades of promises and pledges from the COP summits into concrete action.

If you’ve been with us for a while, you know we’ve previously covered The Economist magazine and the eerie way it’s covers have predicted the future with incredible accuracy more times than I can remember. The magazine was started with heavy Rothschild influence, with the family funding the magazine and being directly involved in it — Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild was Chairman of the company from 1972 to 1989. Still today many believe it is owned and operated by the Deep State. So when a new cover comes out about 2026, it tends to get a lot of attention. Let’s take a look and break it down together: WHAT THE ECONOMIST FORECASTS Every year in November, “The Economist” magazine publishes a guide with predictions for the coming year. But this is not a guide with predictions, but a guide with plans! Even in 2026, Trump remains the most important factor shaping global events, pic.twitter.com/lK4cZs6jRg — mocking the PEOPLE (@alextopol) November 16, 2025 Here’s a full screen look: Often times, these are only really decipherable in hindsight (like the 2013 cover that depicted Hamas using hang-gliders to get into Israel and kill people), so I expect there will be a lot in this that seems confusing now but will become much more clear in hindsight, but let’s see what we can notice… It starts off with the red soccer player kicking what appears to be a cross between a soccer ball and the Earth. On the Earth you have America’s 250th Birthday Celebration featured prominently with Trump and Xi and black suits on two opposite sides of clashing swords and a container ship firing a missile into the 250th Birthday Cake.  That does not look good! There are also tons of syringes and rocket ships throughout the globe, as well as medicine pills, implying a new pandemic or breakout may be coming. Trump, Xi and Netanyahu are all in black suits, while everyone else is in blue and red.  Is black the color of death?  Or power? Putin stands in a blue suit next to Netanyahu and Xi. Zelensky appears to be in an explosion. Robots are extremely prominent everywhere, both human and dog bots. What else do you see? Overall it looks like Trump and America’s 250th birthday celebration are simply surrounded by chaos on all fronts.  It does not look calm or peaceful. Now let’s look back on some historical covers to really blow your mind…. This one was unreal: The Economist Predicted EVERYTHING….In 2013? And they even told us of the coming Trump win: The Economist Just Told You: A TRUMP Win In 2024 Is Guaranteed! The Economist is almost never wrong when it comes to their magazine covers. It's a very strange predictive programming on steroids. More on that below, I'll give you a bunch of examples to let you know why I say this. But first here is the latest and I think you're going to like this: they're telling you Trump is 100% coming back into office! The Economist: Donald Trump poses the biggest danger to the world in 2024. https://t.co/pg0QLi5gNQ — Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) November 18, 2023 Check out these covers: Am I the only one who Smiles when The Economist, and now The Guardian, show how petrified the Globalists are of Trump.... pic.twitter.com/9jHeumunr8 — Connie SERVATIVE (@ConnieSERVATIV3) November 18, 2023 More here: NEW: The Economist’s annual “World Ahead” guide identifies Donald Trump as the biggest global danger of 2024. “[I]n the 38 years that we have published this guide, no single person has ever eclipsed our analysis as much as Donald Trump eclipses 2024.” pic.twitter.com/2xBYJRfo8z — Dylan Byers (@DylanByers) November 16, 2023 Here's what Axios had to say: The Economist says former President Trump presents the world's "biggest danger" in 2024. Why it matters: The respected 180-year-old British newspaper said a "second Trump term would be a watershed in a way the first was not" and the "fate of the world" will depend on the ballots of "tens of thousands of voters in just a handful of states" in the 2024 presidential election. Details: The Economist said in its annual "World Ahead" guide Thursday that another four years of Trump in the White House would be "more damaging" than his previous term. "China and its friends would rejoice over the evidence that American democracy is dysfunctional" and Beijing "could easily miscalculate over Taiwan, with catastrophic consequences." And Russian President Vladimir Putin "would have an incentive to fight on in Ukraine and to pick off former Soviet countries such as Moldova or the Baltic states," according to the outlet. Of note: The "greatest threat" Trump poses "is to his own country," the Economist argues. The "moral authority" of the U.S. would decline "because America will have voted him in while knowing the worst." While "pursuing his enemies," Trump "will wage war on any institution that stands in his way, including the courts and the Department of Justice," the Economist said. The big picture: The former president, who faces 91 criminal charges across four separate jurisdictions, has repeatedly made unsubstantiated claims trying to tie the prosecutors and others to Biden. They ALWAYS tell you in advance: The Economist always tells you in advance.....Trump is coming back! 2nd Term Guaranteed! pic.twitter.com/77v4iqTYTz — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) November 18, 2023 So now let's take a look at what I mean from prior examples.... These are going to blow you mind: The Economist Predicted EVERYTHING....In 2013? Ready to go down the rabbit hole? I'm going to give you photographic proof that is going to blow your mind, and what you do with that is then up to you. I'm just your humble correspondent! Let's talk about The Economist magazine, specifically how they strangely keep predicting the future years and decades in advance! Before I show you those details, let's first talk about who OWNS the Economist magazine, because once you know that fact everything else suddenly makes a lot more sense. So, who owns the Economist? All the "Elite" power families that run the world. No, seriously....almost all of them. I already knew the answer, but I asked ChatGPT so I could show it to you. Take a look: The Economist magazine is owned by The Economist Group. The largest shareholders in The Economist Group are Exor, an investment company controlled by the Agnelli family of Italy, which holds about 43% of the shares, and the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, and Layton families, which collectively own about 21%. The remaining shares are held by a group of independent shareholders, including current and former employees of the magazine. The power players pulling the strings of the puppets on the world stage. So when they own and publish a magazine, they tend to leak some secrets from time to time. Actually, leak may not be the right word. I've covered this many times before, but there seems to be some law of the Universe where these Evil Elites seem obligated to tell of the evil they are doing in advance. I don't understand it, I don't know why, but before every big evil event, you can always find these people telling you it was coming in advance. They often use Hollywood to do it. We've seen countless examples of movies released years and decades in advance that have plots that tell the exact same story of real world events that would not happen for years or decades later. We've seen it with The Simpsons and The X Files. Too many times to count, but here are just a few: "The Lone Gunmen" TV Series (2001) - This show, a spin-off of "The X-Files," featured a pilot episode where the plot involved a government conspiracy to crash a commercial airliner into the World Trade Center to increase arms sales. This episode aired just months before the tragic events of September 11, 2001. "The Siege" (1998) - This film depicted terrorist attacks in New York City, including a bombing of a bus, and the subsequent military occupation of the city in response to the attacks. The themes of terrorism and the response to it in New York City eerily prefigured the events of 9/11. "Network" (1976) - This satirical film about a fictional television network predicted several future trends in the world of media, including the blurring of the line between news and entertainment and the rise of outrage as a media strategy, which has become increasingly relevant in the age of social media and 24-hour news cycles. "Wag the Dog" (1997) - This film, about a political spin doctor and a Hollywood producer who fabricate a war to distract from a presidential scandal, prefigured the way media and public relations tactics are used in politics, especially in the context of the Lewinsky scandal and the subsequent military actions in the Balkans under President Clinton. "Contagion" (2011) - This film's depiction of a global pandemic, originating from bats, and the challenges faced by public health officials, eerily mirrors the COVID-19 pandemic that began in 2019. The movie accurately predicted various aspects of pandemic response, including social distancing, the race for a vaccine, and conspiracy theories about the virus's origin. "Enemy of the State" (1998) - This movie's portrayal of widespread government surveillance, including the ability to track individuals through electronic devices, prefigured the real-life revelations about government surveillance programs like those uncovered by Edward Snowden in 2013. And when they don't use Hollywood, they LOVE to use their precious Economist magazine. But don't take my word for it, let me show you! This is The Economist Magazine from December 2012 / January 2013 issue: Perhaps from the point of view of relevance here and now, the topic of the battle between Hamas and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu is especially relevant, but the most interesting thing in the annual “prophetic cover of The Economist” 10 years ago is different pic.twitter.com/1s57a83e3i — Sprinter Press (@SprinterPress) October 16, 2023 This is a cartoon from The Economist back in 2012. Notice Bibi and Hamas on gliders? Notice Obama in his pedo boat? Notice the devil in charge of the climate change machine? Who controls the past controls the future pic.twitter.com/97d6xIBDSP — DC Coordinator of the Entire Shit Show (@DC30871833) November 10, 2023 Here's a zoom in so you can see the details better: Ok, so we have charming caption " A Rough Guide To Hell"....how nice. But when you start studying the details that's where it starts to blow your mind. Starting at the very top, where you have Netanyahu fighting Hamas....on paragliders! Oh, you mean the EXACT same thing that would happen 10 years after this cover was published, when Hamas (allegedly) used paragliders to fly into Israel in a surprise attack? Just an incredibly odd coincidence, huh? A lot of those keep popping up.... What else do you see?  Drop a comment below, there is a ton hidden in here!  Let's see what everyone can find! Then you have the literal devil running the Climate Change hoax, so I guess they got that one right. And you have Obama in his pedo pride boat.... Interesting. Like this you mean? What happened on the boat ride that George Clooney and Barack Obama took in Italy....? There seems to be a lot of controversy about it...#WeWantAnswers #GeorgeClooney #Obama pic.twitter.com/NNxCSWncz6 — Isaac’s Army (@ReturnOfKappy) November 8, 2023 https://twitter.com/honkmediatv/status/1610999098659966977 A lot more here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gwPf8K3_Ms But it's far from the first time The Economist has accurately predicted the future.... This may be the most famous one: Ever wanted to read the full Phoenix article from The Economist?bc I've found it .. (1/3) pic.twitter.com/eCphZ9u5i1 — matata •• (@wtfakamoto) June 27, 2022 The gold us on The Economist magazine cover back in 1988 what was coming. A Phoenix bird standing on burning world currencies. The Lebanese lira just failed. If you bought gold/silver, you’re up over 900% (in lira) in the last 6 months. pic.twitter.com/tn1NVbohKE — Michael In Truth (@MichaelInTruth) March 10, 2023 Here's a Zoom in: That's the infamous Phoenix rising from the ashes of burning fiat US dollars.... They predicted it would happen in 2018 and you have to wonder if Trump winning in 2016 altered that timeline? Oh by the way, did I mention that cover photo is from 1988? Yes, 30 years prior to the date they predicted it would happen. Guess they missed it by a few years, but it's definitely here now, and I keep telling you the US Dollar is about to implode. Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words, so if your eyes glaze over when I talk about the US Dollar and economics, just burn this picture into your mind of the greenbacks burning and going to ZERO, while Bitcoin (or more accurately what looks like XRP and XLM) rise from the ashes. Now do you get it?

A Democratic congressional candidate in Tennessee is facing massive criticism for prior comments she made about the city she wishes to represent. Aftyn Behn, who is running to represent Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, said “I hate this city,” referring to Nashville, on a 2020 podcast. “I hate the city, I hate the bachelorettes, I hate the pedal taverns, I hate country music, I hate all of the things that make Nashville,” Behn said. “I hate it,” she added. Listen to the audio below: Aftyn Behn– the Democrat nominee for the upcoming TN07 special election– says that she despises Nashville, the city that she's running to represent in Congress: “I hate the city, I hate the bachelorettes, I hate the pedal taverns, I hate country music, I hate all of the… pic.twitter.com/L9lmo1YkkJ — Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 19, 2025 The resurfaced comment will likely have significant implications on the December 2nd special election to replace GOP Rep. Mark Green, who resigned earlier this year. Behn is running against Republican nominee Matt Van Epps. Early voters cast their ballots in the special election on Thursday. Fox News shared more: The district, which is located in central and western Tennessee and stretches from Kentucky to Alabama, is solidly red. President Donald Trump carried the district by 22 points in his 2024 White House victory. But the district includes parts of the Democratic stronghold of Nashville, Tennessee’s capital and its most populous city, and a major national center for the country music industry. The district encompasses parts of north and west Nashville, including the downtown area which has long been a very popular tourist destination. “The Democrat running in a special election for Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, Aftyn Behn, is running on the message: ‘I hate this place, elect me!’ Tennessee deserves better,” the Republican National Committee (RNC) argued in a social media post on Thursday. Fox News discussed her comments, noting how bizarre it is to “hate” the place you wish to represent in Washington D.C. Check it out: Aftyn Behn, the Democrat running in Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District special election, has branded her own state as racist and declared that she hates everything about Nashville—including its country music, bachelorette parties, and pedal taverns. “I hate the city, I hate… pic.twitter.com/xknvdQUVlr — RedWave Press (@RedWave_Press) November 20, 2025 FOX 17 noted: Timothy Ford is a Democrat and came to the polls for early voting. “Really surprised someone would even talk like that about Nashville,” he said. “I think she should apologize as many times as she can.” The podcast episode instantly changed his mind. “I want to go get my vote back and keep it,” said Ford. John Wiggins is also a Democrat. He had just finished casting his vote for Behn when FOX 17 News approached him. “I don’t think she’d have to apologize,” said Wiggins. “I think it was taken out of context.” He said the audio does not change his mind. “That shouldn’t matter,” said Wiggins. “I’m looking at the bigger issues.” Conservative political analyst Steve Gill predicts the clip will hurt Behn’s chances of winning.