Sen. Edward Markey (D-MA) accused the Trump administration of approving the “first private data center on public land using a permit meant for a solar project.” “Instead of building clean energy to lower utility bills, the President wants more data centers to make Big Tech rich using OUR land and resources. No way,” Markey said on Facebook. “In June 2026, The Bureau of Land Management approved the Townsite Data Center project to construct, operate, and maintain a data center on 88.5 acres of public land in the vicinity of the existing Townsite Solar 1 project,” the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) stated. “The approval supports federal efforts to accelerate permitting for data center infrastructure and is consistent with Executive Order 14318 Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure,” the release continued. “This project reflects the growing role of public lands in supporting the infrastructure needed to power innovation, advanced technology, and the nation’s future economic growth, while advancing the Bureau’s commitment to responsible stewardship and sustainable use of public lands for current and future generations,” it added. Trump Administration Officially Approves First Data Center on U.S. Public Land. The Bureau of Land Management approved 88.5 acres in southern Nevada, the first ever authorized on BLM land. That land is home to desert tortoises, bighorn sheep, kit foxes, and burrowing owls.… pic.twitter.com/MqxevvtL7c — Localize – Farmers Market (@Localizefoodapp) July 28, 2026 The Center for Biological Diversity and the Sierra Toiyabe Chapter said they filed an “administrative appeal challenging federal approval of the Townsite Data Center in Boulder City, Nevada.” As a data center developer moves its project forward on federal land in Boulder City using an unusual regulatory mechanism, a heated land use debate has sparked appeals and a resolution in Congress that would ban data centers on federal land.STORY: https://t.co/5Pf8xFpJjd pic.twitter.com/dhUndA9Qoe — Las Vegas Review-Journal (@reviewjournal) July 28, 2026 More from the Center for Biological Diversity: The 167-megawatt data center, proposed by Skylar Capital Management, was approved by the Bureau of Land Management in June through an unorthodox permitting procedure that avoided any environmental review or public participation. It is the first data center ever approved on public lands. “It’s an outrage that the Trump administration is giving away our public lands to hedge funds for data centers,” said Patrick Donnelly, Great Basin director at the Center for Biological Diversity. “Public lands are for wildlife and clean water, for recreation and spiritual renewal. They’re not meant for big tech companies to spew air pollution and suck down water for AI and the surveillance state.” The data center would be built on desert tortoise habitat in Eldorado Valley, southeast of Las Vegas. Water for the project would be sourced from within the parched Colorado River Basin. It is within the city limits of the small town of Boulder City, which is also filing an appeal. Today’s appeal says the BLM unlawfully sidestepped environmental review laws by using a prior authorization for a solar project at the same site to fulfill requirements for authorizing the data center. This meant the public never had an opportunity to review the data center plans or offer input before the BLM approved the project. “Trump is sidestepping the law and shutting the public out of decisions about our public lands,” said Olivia Tanager, executive director at the Sierra Club Toiyabe Chapter. “By cutting the public out of the process, they’re trying to hand over Nevada’s desert to billion-dollar tech companies without anyone getting a say. If this isn’t challenged, it won’t stop in Boulder City — it will become the blueprint for data centers across public lands in the West. We’re fighting to make sure that never happens.” Joining the appeal are several residents of Boulder City who would be harmed by the data center if it were constructed. “The Boulder City Council unanimously voted to appeal the recent Bureau of Land Management (BLM) approval for a data center on an 80-acre federally-owned parcel within the City of Boulder City’s jurisdiction. The federal land would receive local utilities and emergency response services, and the City contends that the BLM did not consult with the City or provide adequate opportunity for public input on the approved data center, as required by federal law. Townsite Solar 2, LLC (TS2). previously withdrew its application to lease a nearby City-owned site,” the City of Boulder City stated. “During the meeting, in response to questions from City Council, City Attorney Brittany Walker explained that had the BLM engaged in processes required under federal law, the City of Boulder City would have had a more meaningful opportunity for input. Council member Steve Walton expressed shock at the BLM’s conclusion that a data center is similar to a solar power generation and battery energy storage project. Council member Denise Ashurst noted that the BLM’s decision was ‘out of the norm’ and requested that the City Attorney keep the City Council and public updated on the decision. Finally, Council member Sherri Jorgensen stated that she sees this as a bipartisan issue and also expressed disbelief in the decision,” it continued. An appeal by two conservation groups is the latest opposition to surface against a Boulder City data center. #8NN https://t.co/OqKO7ExLVs pic.twitter.com/47Rvy1FiMV — 8 News Now (@8NewsNow) July 28, 2026 “I’ve heard myriad warnings about the negative impacts hyperscale AI data centers have had on small towns across the United States, but have yet to find a single town whose residents have thanked their government for bestowing one of these industrial behemoths upon them,” said Brynn DeLorimier, a local business owner in Boulder City. “I believe placing such a facility in a water-starved desert where we see increasingly hot summers year over year is about the most shortsighted decision any level of government could possibly make. We don’t want to see our utility rates skyrocket while our property values plummet, we don’t want to see our tourism industry destroyed, we don’t want to see our water supply contaminated, and we don’t want the natural beauty of our desert to turn into an industrial wasteland,” DeLorimier continued. FOX5 Vegas shared further: Officials say Monday’s appeal claims the BLM “unlawfully sidestepped environmental review laws.” The nonprofit claims the public never had an opportunity to review the data center plans or offer input before the BLM approved the project. FOX5 has been following the Boulder City Council meetings involving the project. Many residents packed past council meetings, expressing opposition to the data center proposal. City officials noted that although the proposed site is on BLM-owned land, it falls within Boulder City’s geographical boundary, meaning Boulder City police, fire, water, and public roadways would be utilized if the data center is built. The post “First Private Data Center” Approved On “Public Land” – Democrat Senator Alleges appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

The Senate on Tuesday confirmed Jay Clayton, the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York and former Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, as the next Director of National Intelligence (DNI). Clayton was confirmed in a 51-47 vote along party lines. Breaking News: The Senate confirmed Jay Clayton to oversee the nation’s intelligence agencies. https://t.co/we5czlIJBw — The New York Times (@nytimes) July 28, 2026 More from The New York Times: Though his nomination was initially met with some good will from Democrats, Mr. Clayton shed that bipartisan support during his confirmation hearing this month after he refused to clearly state that Joseph R. Biden Jr. had won the 2020 presidential election. Though Democrats opposed Mr. Clayton, some have privately expressed relief that he will take the reins of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence from Bill Pulte, a housing official who has pursued campaigns of retribution against President Trump’s perceived enemies. Still, in a statement after the vote, Senator Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia, voiced some skepticism about Mr. Clayton, despite their longstanding relationship. “I came away from his confirmation process with serious reservations about whether he would be willing to stand up to political pressure when it matters most,” said Mr. Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee. “Now that he has been confirmed, I sincerely hope he proves those concerns unfounded, because the intelligence community deserves steadier leadership than it has received in recent months.” “Congratulations to the Great Jay Clayton on his confirmation by the United States Senate, to be the next Director of National Intelligence. Jay is outstanding in every way, and will do a spectacular job as Director!” President Trump commented. According to Fox News, Clayton steps into the role permanently after Pulte led an approximate “30% staff reduction.” Acting DNI touts 'approximately 30% Staff Reduction from Weeks Ago' as Senate is poised to confirm Trump's DNI nominee Jay Clayton pic.twitter.com/yJSdyj9wxM — Fox News Politics (@foxnewspolitics) July 28, 2026 Fox News shared further: Clayton’s confirmation was thought to be a means to an end for the ongoing standoff over Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a tool that has been used to thwart several terror plots, including a planned mass-casualty event at a Taylor Swift concert in Vienna, Austria. However, they changed their tune when it came time to vote, and after a contentious confirmation hearing where only Republicans voted to send him to the Senate floor. “As Senate Republicans move to once again confirm an inexperienced and unqualified nominee to a position of massive national security consequence for years to come, one thing remains clear — this type of politicized leadership will only make Americans less safe,” Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said in a statement. Boiled down, the Section 702 program allows the U.S. government to collect intelligence on foreigners abroad who are using U.S. communication systems, and it serves as a major part of Trump’s daily intelligence briefing. But it also sweeps up communications from Americans who are talking to foreign suspects — a key issue that threatened reauthorization among privacy hawks in both parties well before Pulte’s appointment and Clayton’s subsequent nomination. The program expired, however, last month in response to Pulte’s appointment, despite warnings from Republicans that allowing Section 702 to go dark could have dire national security consequences. And Clayton’s confirmation, for now, does not appear to be breaking through the partisan logjam. Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., and the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, told Fox News Digital that the pressure wasn’t on to reauthorize FISA. The post BREAKING: Senate Confirms Critical Trump Nominee appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a nationwide ground stop for American Airlines flights due to an IT outage. The ground stop took effect at approximately 6:30 p.m. ET and was canceled at 7:18 p.m. Hundreds of flights were delayed because of the issue. DEVELOPING: American Airlines flights not in the air were being held for a nationwide ground stop Tuesday evening because of an IT outage, according to an advisory from the Federal Aviation Administration. Read more: https://t.co/JAMUb4pzRu pic.twitter.com/91NsjfxS7H — ABC News (@ABC) July 28, 2026 Reuters has more: “Systems are coming back online ‌now ⁠and flights are departing again,” American said in a statement. “We put a temporary ground stop in place while our teams worked to resolve the ​issue. We apologize ​to our ⁠customers for the inconvenience.” FlightAware, a flight-tracking site, said American had delayed 1,100 ​flights, or 30% of flights on ​Tuesday ⁠and canceled 221, or 6% of flights. Flightradar24, another aviation website, said as of 7 p.m. ET ⁠there ​were 130 fewer flights in ​the air than at the same time last week. The ground stop involving American Airlines follows issues on Monday at all three New York City-area airports due to staffing. An FAA spokesperson said staffing issues and severe weather caused significant disruptions at LaGuardia, Newark, and JFK airports. A ground stop continues for Newark Airport through 7:30 p.m. LaGuardia and JFK are also under a ground stop through 7 p.m. Over 1,000 flights to and from the three airports have been cancelled so far. Here's the latest: https://t.co/06THc3qXnW — PIX11 News (@PIX11News) July 28, 2026 PIX11 shared further: Flights heading to all three were delayed well over an hour and are expected to be delayed through the late night, according to the FAA. Ground stops were lifted after 8 p.m. by the FAA. The spokesperson did not say why the New York control center was understaffed to begin the week. FlightAware data shows roughly 500 delayed inbound flights across the three airports as of 4:30 p.m. on Monday. Approximately 80 inbound flights had already been canceled. Over 300 flights leaving the New York City area were delayed as well, according to FlightAware. The post American Airlines Flights Grounded Nationwide, Here’s Why appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

A big thanks to a friend for sending me this (shoutout Robb)… This video is going viral today exposing the three lies Democrat Socialists (translation: Communists) always tell, and because these people are somehow gaining more and more power in America, I wanted to post this so we can get the TRUTH out there and fight back. Will you please help me share this far and wide? Watch right here, it’s really good and easy to understand: Backup here: !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2oodx”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”); Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v7b7ymg”,”div”:”rumble_v7b7ymg”}); Please share and let’s educate as many people as we can! This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post EXPOSING The Three Lies Democratic Socialists ALWAYS Tell appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

A new interview on Diary of a CEO just went live and the guest offered two real and legal ways for President Trump to serve another term in 2028. I’ll show you first and then I’ll break it all down and tell you what I think… Watch here: The US Constitution states that somebody cannot run for a third term as president. But it doesn’t say he can’t be a third term president. That’s the loophole they are looking to exploit. https://t.co/9zcMso5nNe pic.twitter.com/7gnqNPssgO — MAGA Cult Slayer (@MAGACult2) July 27, 2026 Backup video here if needed: !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/u2oodx”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”); Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v7b7yye”,”div”:”rumble_v7b7yye”}); So, are those true? The second one is. It would mean things are bad, very bad, and so I would hate to have a Trump 2028 under those circumstances. I don’t think President Trump wants that either. But it’s real. Now for the other one….the answer here might surprise you. I had always assumed this was a non-starter, but among legal scholars there is a robust debate on the topic. Here’s how both sides shape up: The claim in the post describes a real textual ambiguity that some commentators and a minority of scholars have floated, but the prevailing view among legal experts is that it does not create a workable path for a twice-elected president (such as Trump after completing a second term) to serve again via succession. It remains untested in court. What the 22nd Amendment actually says The relevant text is: “No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.” It repeatedly uses the word “elected.” It does not say “serve,” “hold,” or “act as.” This is the basis for the claimed loophole: a person barred from election might still become president through succession (e.g., as vice president if the president dies, resigns, or is removed) or potentially other routes in the line of succession. The 12th Amendment complication The 12th Amendment states that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.” Critics of the loophole argue that someone barred by the 22nd Amendment from being elected president is thereby “constitutionally ineligible” to the office, and thus cannot serve as vice president (or, by extension, occupy other positions that put them in the line of succession under the Presidential Succession Act). This view treats the qualifications for the two offices as linked. Supporters of the loophole counter that “constitutionally ineligible” in the 12th Amendment (ratified in 1804) originally referred to the basic Article II qualifications (natural-born citizen, at least 35 years old, 14 years a resident), not the later term-limit restriction. A few law-review articles have argued the text permits a twice-elected president to become vice president and then succeed. Expert consensus and practical reality Most constitutional scholars who have addressed the issue describe the succession theory as implausible or contrary to the clear purpose of the 22nd Amendment (adopted after Franklin D. Roosevelt’s four elections, to prevent any individual from holding the presidency for more than roughly two terms). Allowing repeated succession schemes would effectively nullify the term limit and could theoretically enable indefinite service. Courts would almost certainly be asked to decide the question, and the odds of the loophole succeeding are widely viewed as low. In short: The 22nd Amendment’s wording focuses on election, creating the textual opening the post highlights. The combination of the 12th Amendment, historical intent, and scholarly consensus makes the claimed path highly doubtful and unproven. Any real attempt would trigger immediate lawsuits, political crisis, and likely failure. No one has successfully tested this, and it is not treated as an accepted constitutional option. Claims of a simple, reliable “loophole” overstate the case. So that could absolutely happen! I would be weary of how our current Supreme Court would rule on it, but it’s an open possibility. I actually think the much more likely route is a THIRD option — like this: Here’s Exactly How I Predict President Trump Will Get His Third (Fourth?) Term… /*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js We’ve been talking a LOT about a potential third (or would that be “fourth”?) term for President Trump this week. Yesterday I brought you this: President Trump Follows Up, Confirms He’s “Not Joking” About A Third (Fourth?) Term /*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js Now today we had this breakdown on legal options for how it could happen: Legal Analyst Explains ‘Loophole’ President Trump’s Lawyers Could Use for THIRD TERM (And Why He’s RIGHT!) /*! This file is auto-generated */!function(d,l){“use strict”;l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&”undefined”!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll(‘iframe[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),o=l.querySelectorAll(‘blockquote[data-secret=”‘+t.secret+'”]’),c=new RegExp(“^https?:$”,”i”),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);//# sourceURL=https://wltreport.com/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js What I want to do right now is break down exactly how I think this could actually happen. This is one of those articles you might want to bookmark and save, or maybe even print out.  I am going to do the same.  Because I have a feeling we might just be looking back on this in 2027 and 2028 and be stunned to see it play out before your very eyes. I want to be clear, this is pure (educated) speculation on my part.  Entirely speculation, but I cover these things for a living.  I live in this world and I feel like I have gotten to know President Trump very well over the past 10 years.  I know how he thinks and I know how he works. So here is my pure speculation on how I think this could play out and how I believe it’s not far-fetched at all to believe President Trump could waltz into a third term. First, I’ll tell you what I don’t think is an option. I don’t think parsing words in the 22nd Amendment is an option. There’s a lot of speculation going around out there saying Trump’s attorneys are parsing the language in the 22nd Amendment and focusing on the word “elected”. The wording of the 22nd Amendment is actually quite clear and straight-forward. Here it is: Amendment XXIIPassed by Congress March 21, 1947. Ratified February 27, 1951. Section 1.No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term. Section 2.This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress. Some people claim a workaround would be that JD Vance would run and Trump would be his Vice President and then JD Vance, once elected, would step down and Trump would take office by succession, not by “being elected”. I think that’s extremely flimsy and quite frankly just noise to distract people. I don’t buy it. Mainly because the 12th Amendment expressly prohibits exactly that scenario, key part again in red: Amendment XIIPassed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804. The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; the person having the greatest number of votes for President shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. So I think that’s all just noise, designed to get people off track.  Sleight of hand, if you will. What I actually think will happen is much simpler. The cleanest and most fool-proof way to get this done is to simply Amend or Revoke the 22nd Amendment. There’s no serious legal argument that that wouldn’t work.  There’s a process for it.  We’ve used that process 27 times to create 27 Amendments to the Constitution.  It works and it’s available. In fact, the last one is not that old, being passed in 1992. The problem here becomes the fact that it’s extremely unlikely in our divided modern day Congress, because Step 1 is a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, which is extremely difficult right now. And then step 2 is approval from three-fourths of the state legislatures (currently 38 out of 50 states). So you can see the challenge. This is where I see the grand plan come into play…. I have always believed that President Trump and team caught the 2020 election steal in realtime.  I believe that data is safely stored, either with Space Force or somewhere else. I believe President Trump knew he needed to win 2024 organically, the real way, with such a big win that no one could question it. I believe he knew that trying to release the data on the 2020 steal too early would have fractured our country, so that’s why he hasn’t disclosed it yet. And quite frankly, even now our country is still quite divided. But….imagine in 2026, 2027 or even 2028 if the IRS has been shut down, the Country is roaring again, all the violent migrants have been deported, America is healing, people are happy again, our food has been made safe again thanks to RFK and we literally think and feel better because we’re no longer eating toxins, our country is rich again, we have Bitcoin and crypto reserves, we have a Strategic Opportunity Fund making money for Americans and maybe instead of making you annual April 15th payment to the IRS, maybe we all get a dividend check from the Opportunity Fund? Imagine THAT reality. Imagine a reality where even his haters have to say they’ve never seen America so strong. We are seeing the earliest of inklings of that happening with things like Bill Maher having dinner with President Trump at the White House. Folks, it’s possible…I can see it!  I can see it in my mind very clearly. Now….imagine we’re living in that reality and President Trump comes on TV suddenly one day to hold an emergency press conference. “My fellow Americans….” And then he rolls it all out.  The evidence of the 2020 steal.  Clear as day.  Irrefutable.  America is stunned as the reality sets in.  All of the information is sourced, verified and posted online for all to inspect. In the following days, his toughest critics examine it only to find its clear and indisputable. And then the reality sets in…. People start to piece it all together in their heads.  He’s had this in his back pocket since 2020!  He didn’t try to stay in power or remove Joe Biden.  He let the legal process play out.  He didn’t want to send this country into a Civil War so he held it all back.  He dodged an assassination, he dodged four lawfare cases, and he won 2024 fair and square.  And now he’s literally saved America and made us prosperous again!  Healthy again!  Safe again!  Rich again!  Happy again! That’s exactly the moment that I believe there will be such a strong groundswell of support of people saying “this man was cheated out of a term in 2020.  He’s done more than any other President, probably even more than Lincoln and Washington.  He deserves another term.” I believe the people will also demand it of the politicians. And that’s when I believe there will be such a groundswell of support that reaching those thresholds for a Constitutional Amendment will no longer look daunting. I believe we will roll right through them and you’ll be looking at a new 28th Amendment and you’ll be looking at President Trump for 2028-2032. Of course he’ll have to run again and win, but I think that will also be the time when you’ll see the first President to win all 50 states. Ronald Reagan came close, winning 49 out of 50, but I think you’ll see the full 50/50 go red for Trump in 2028. So there you go! That’s my theory and I’m putting it out there, putting it on paper for the whole world to see April 2, 2025. Check back with me in the future and let’s see how I do, ok? This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Expert Gives Two LEGAL Ways For President Trump To Serve Another Term In 2028 appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.