New Jersey’s governor just confirmed that the state’s motor-vehicle system registered thousands of people to vote after they explicitly said they were not U.S. citizens. The first number is roughly 6,600. The second is the one no official can wave away as a paperwork problem: the state’s preliminary review found that fewer than 400 people from that improperly registered group later cast ballots. Here is the story that broke Tuesday afternoon: More than 6,000 non-citizens registered to vote in NJ by 'software error,' Gov. Sherrill admits https://t.co/cagXJ3aT3i pic.twitter.com/jCnplUkqmW — New York Post (@nypost) July 21, 2026 The disclosure is contained in an official statement from Governor Mikie Sherrill, who said she learned about the error last week. She described it as a serious failure inside the New Jersey Motor Vehicle System. From June 2023 through June 2024, residents applying for driver’s licenses or identification cards were asked on a keypad whether they were U.S. citizens. Roughly 6,600 selected “no,” but the system registered them to vote anyway. Sherrill said the registrations occurred nearly three years before she took office and through no fault of the affected residents. She ordered her chief counsel to investigate, directed officials to remove the erroneous registrations and said the Motor Vehicle Commission is replacing the software vendor. The governor’s preliminary analysis found that fewer than 400 people newly registered through the error voted in later elections. Those registrations were spread around the state and included Democrats, Republicans and unaffiliated voters, according to her statement. Pause on what that means. The system asked the controlling eligibility question, received an answer that should have stopped the voter-registration process, and then produced a registration anyway. This was not a failure to ask. It was a failure to honor the answer. The state has not accused the 6,600 residents of causing the software error. That matters, both legally and morally. It also makes the system failure more astonishing, not less. Registration and voting are separate acts, and the official statement does not establish that every ballot in the preliminary group was illegal. It does not say how many affected registrants, if any, became citizens between the erroneous registration and the election in which they voted. That unanswered question is exactly why a complete public audit is now necessary. Sherrill acknowledged the error directly: Last week I learned that a serious software error in New Jersey’s Motor Vehicle System led to the registration of roughly 6,600 people who indicated that they were not U.S. citizens between June 2023 and June 2024, almost three years prior to my taking office. These individuals… — Governor Mikie Sherrill (@GovSherrillNJ) July 21, 2026 Sherrill also used the announcement to accuse President Trump and congressional Republicans of politicizing New Jersey’s voter rolls. She said her administration was now delivering the accountability that Washington had demanded. That argument does not erase the data in her own statement. The Associated Press independently confirmed the state’s two central figures: roughly 6,600 registrations created by the error and fewer than 400 people from that group who subsequently voted. The wire service also reported that the registrations have now been deactivated. New Jersey has about 6.9 million registered voters, and more than 4 million ballots were cast in the state in the 2024 presidential election. The 6,600 records equal roughly one-tenth of one percent of statewide registrations, all produced by a failure at a critical eligibility checkpoint. The software failure occurred while Democrat Phil Murphy was governor, and Sherrill succeeded him in January 2026. Her office says the current administration is pursuing an independent investigation while the Motor Vehicle Commission moves to a new vendor. Federal officials say their scrutiny helped force the disclosure, while Sherrill says New Jersey had already been addressing the issue. The disagreement now extends to a DHS estimate of as many as 35,152 potential noncitizens on the rolls, a broader federal screening figure that should not be conflated with the state’s confirmed 6,600-person software-error group. DHS has now put that larger potential number into the public record: Appreciate you responding back to our letter, @GovSherrillNJ. This should’ve been done a LONG time ago. Just ONE illegal vote cancels out the vote of a U.S. citizen. As @DHSgov reported last week—New Jersey could have as many as 35,152 potential non-citizens registered to vote.… https://t.co/HF17hLlOkj — Secretary Markwayne Mullin (@SecMullinDHS) July 21, 2026 The distinction between those numbers must be kept straight. The 6,600 figure describes people New Jersey identified inside one specific software failure. The 35,152 figure is a broader federal estimate of potential noncitizen registrations that still requires individual verification. Neither side should be allowed to blur those categories for political advantage. New Jersey now owes voters the full timeline, the software rules that produced the registrations, the vendor’s role and the date each responsible official learned about the problem. The state should also disclose which elections included ballots from the affected registration pool and how it determined each voter’s citizenship status on Election Day. Nobody should be pronounced guilty from a database label alone. But nobody in government gets to hide behind that caution and pretend a system that ignored 6,600 direct citizenship answers was working. A software error is the beginning of the investigation, not the end of it. The question was asked. The answer was “no.” The registration still happened. Now the public deserves every answer that follows. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post New Jersey Admits 6,600 Noncitizens Were Registered To Vote. The Number Who Cast Ballots Is Worse appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review a case where an Alaskan bush pilot claims that state authorities are attempting to seize his $95,000 plane after a passenger allegedly brought a six-pack of beer on a flight bound for a dry village. “Kenneth Jouppi was running a one-man air taxi service out of Fairbanks in 2012 when state troopers found alcohol on his 1969 Cessna. He was preparing to fly a customer and her groceries to Beaver, a remote village that bans alcohol possession. The conviction: a misdemeanor for alcohol importation. The penalty: total forfeiture of his plane,” Fox News wrote. “Now the nation’s highest court will decide whether that seizure violates the 8th Amendment’s ban on excessive fines — a ruling that could reshape civil asset forfeiture law across the country,” it added. The Supreme Court just agreed to hear the case of an 82-year-old Alaskan man whose $95,000 plane was seized by the state — over a single six-pack of beer. Kenneth Jouppi was running a one-man air taxi service out of Fairbanks in 2012 when state troopers found alcohol on his 1969… pic.twitter.com/vqa4RhxU0s — Fox News Politics (@foxnewspolitics) July 20, 2026 SCOTUSblog explained further: The case now before the court began more than 14 years ago, when Jouppi was scheduled to fly a passenger from Fairbanks to Beaver, Alaska – approximately a one-hour flight. Before Jouppi took off, state troopers arrived at the airport, searched his plane, found the beer that the passenger was bringing to her husband in Beaver, and charged both the passenger and Jouppi (as well as his company) with knowingly bringing alcohol to a “dry” village. Jouppi was found guilty. The trial judge sentenced him to three days in prison and ordered him to pay a fine of $1,500. The state also sought to forfeit Jouppi’s plane. The Alaska Supreme Court ruled that the forfeiture did not violate the Constitution. In its view, “the forfeiture of Jouppi’s airplane is not grossly disproportional to the gravity of the offense for which he has been convicted and, therefore … does not violate the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment.” Jouppi then came to the Supreme Court in August, asking the justices to decide whether, to determine if a fine violates the excessive fines clause, courts should consider the gravity of the specific defendant’s conduct. The justices on Monday granted review without comment; the case will likely be argued in December. The justices are scheduled to issue their next summer order list on Monday, Aug. 17. “I’m in my 80s now, and I’ve been fighting this for over a decade because I see it as my duty to ensure that the Bill of Rights actually means something in protecting against government overreach,” Jouppi said in a statement, according to the Associated Press. Alaska wants to seize pilot's plane over 6-pack of beer. The case is heading to the Supreme Court https://t.co/BtT2TQynqb pic.twitter.com/ZDhSQ3hKVs — New York Post (@nypost) July 20, 2026 More from the Associated Press: Jouppi’s attorneys say Alaska’s high court examined his conduct “purely in abstract terms” and didn’t evaluate whether it was part of a broader pattern of criminal activity. And they say it wasn’t. “Few excessive fines cases will present the issue so sharply; a decision upholding the forfeiture of an airplane for a six-pack is a self-recommending candidate for review,” lawyers from the Institute for Justice wrote in their appeal. In response, lawyers from the Alaska Attorney General’s office argued that the state Supreme Court’s “fact-bound decision” should be allowed to stand. “Courts across the country apply a multi-factor test to determine whether a fine or forfeiture is grossly disproportional to the gravity of the offense,” they wrote. “Jouppi does not claim that the four-part standard applied by the Alaska Supreme Court is wrong, only that the court misapplied settled law by giving too much weight to some factors and not enough weight to others.” Jouppi’s attorneys argue that the ruling from the state’s highest court conflicts with case law established in other courts, including U.S. Supreme Court precedent. “The Excessive Fines Clause was built for cases like this,” they said. Alaska’s attorneys said Jouppi hasn’t shown how punishing him with forfeiture of his plane is “grossly disproportional to the gravity of his offense.” “Alcohol abuse is a serious problem in rural Alaska, and airplanes are sometimes the only realistic means to commit the crime of alcohol importation,” they wrote. The post State Allegedly Wants To Seize Pilot’s Plane Over A Six-Pack Of Beer, Supreme Court To Hear Case appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

A police department in Wisconsin faces accusations of installing Flock Safety cameras without informing the town’s mayor or city council. “The City of Chetek installed two flock cameras in late May,” WLAX stated. Knowledge of the cameras sparked public concerns over privacy. Chetek Mayor Jeff Martin supports the use of the cameras. Martin said the police chief did nothing “illegal or wrong.” “As the head of his department, he has the right. If he thinks, hey, this tool will help, he didn’t have to come to me or the council and ask permission,” Martin said. “It’s part of his operating budget. So, the funds for these things came out of his operating budget. He had the money, I assume, because, again, he didn’t ask for extra,” he added. Watch below: Police officers in Wisconsin are now secretly installing Flock cameras in neighborhoods without getting permission from the local government or city council. After the police officers were caught, the mayor said the police have the right to install any camera to spy on citizens… pic.twitter.com/abTMXkdmoV — Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) July 21, 2026 WLAX has more: In a city council meeting about the issue last week, Chetek Police Chief, Ron Ambrozaitis had a outburst in response to public comments criticizing the use of flock cameras. He has since apologized for his actions at the meeting. Flock Safety license plate reader cameras have caused outrage in communities across the United States. For instance, multiple towns in Connecticut decided to remove the cameras. Multiple Towns In Blue State To Remove Flock Safety Cameras WEAU shared further: Mayor Jeff Martin said Police Chief Ron Ambrozaitis did not inform him or the City Council before the cameras went up. “He put them up without informing me or any of the council. He just went and did it,” Martin said. “I’m sure that’s what he’s like, ‘Oh, this will be great.’” The cameras quickly drew criticism from some community members, including Zach Hodgson, who said the technology could expand surveillance in small towns. “I just don’t believe we need a mass surveillance town in every city, in every town, in parks, um, everywhere,” Hodgson said. Hodgson said he believes Ambrozaitis had good intentions, but criticized how the rollout was handled. The post Police Department In Small Town Criticized For Reportedly Installing Flock Safety Cameras Without Notifying Mayor Or City Council appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Men in their 50s, 60s, 70s, and beyond are restoring their Manhood and becoming ABSOLUTE ANIMALS using this long-lost WW2 formula. It’s a safe, natural erection-restoring blend that was discovered inside Hitler’s bunker in 1945 and buried in military archives for nearly 80 years. Yet it’s getting banned. Why? Simple. The Pecker Pill Industry is threatened by this formula. See, they don’t want guys to know about this secret. Because if people found out that a simple natural formula could restore rock-hard erections — and that it doesn’t cause heart issues, headaches, or the scary side effects of little blue tablets… These pharma CEOs wouldn’t sell a dime of their overpriced chemicals ever again. The military-intelligence doctor who exposed this secret says it’s one of the most shocking discoveries he’s seen in his entire career. He even made a video where he walks you through how to make it — TAP HERE TO SEE IT (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!) This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Hitler’s secret formula helps men perform – WARNING appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) on Sunday said the United States sends $2 billion to the Kingdom of Jordan each year. “Their King spent $100 million on luxury properties in Malibu, DC, & London. I offered an amendment to end the welfare,” Massie said. Massie thanked five other House Republicans who voted for his amendment. They include: Rep. Chip Roy Rep. Nancy Mace Rep. Josh Brecheen Rep. Eric Burlison Rep. Warren Davidson The amendment to eliminate the approximately $2.1 billion in U.S. assistance and military aid to Jordan was overwhelmingly rejected in a 421-6 vote. The U.S. sends $2 billion to the Kingdom of Jordan each year. Their King spent $100 million on luxury properties in Malibu, DC, & London. I offered an amendment to end the welfare. Thank the 5 who voted w/me. @RepChipRoy @RepNancyMace @RepBrecheen @RepEricBurlison @Rep_Davidson pic.twitter.com/pntgvD1YCK — Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) July 19, 2026 More from The American Conservative: The United States has provided Jordan with around $33.8 billion in assistance during the past 75 years. In 2022, the Biden Administration signed a memorandum of understanding with Jordan pledging $1.45 billion annually over seven years, the largest-ever MOU with the Hashemite Kingdom. This year, Congress authorized over $2 billion in aid to the country, placing it among the top three recipients of U.S. aid worldwide for 2026. It might seem logical to some for Washington to send billions in aid to a nation facing a desperate financial crisis. But while Jordan indeed experiences an elevated unemployment rate, it is far from the world’s poorest country. According to the World Bank, its GDP has quadrupled during the last two decades and is significantly higher than that of many African countries, including Burundi, Malawi, and Madagascar. “Jordan’s economy remains resilient, supported by sound macroeconomic policies,” asserted the International Monetary Fund in December. The life expectancy of Jordanians is around 78 years, ranking in the top third of countries, indicating relatively better healthcare services offered to citizens. For progressives, it is important that Washington only send aid to countries that share its values. Unfortunately, Jordan does not meet this criterion. According to the Economist’s most recent rating of countries’ levels of democracy, Jordan is labeled an “authoritarian regime,” the lowest ranking. In the 2024 parliamentary election, the Islamic Action Front—long considered the Muslim Brotherhood’s political wing—won the most seats. Yet, the following year, Jordanian authorities banned the Muslim Brotherhood and raided its headquarters. Reporters Without Borders ranked Jordan 142nd out of 180 countries worldwide in its 2026 press freedom ranking, lamenting widespread censorship. If U.S. aid is meant to support democracies, then there is little reason to send billions to Amman as King Abdullah II and his intelligence services continue to dominate Jordanian politics. Another reason cited for offering aid to Jordan is the Syrian refugee crisis. After the 2011 war erupted, Jordan generously accepted over 600,000 Syrian-registered refugees, ensuring that these Syrians stayed in the region and did not migrate to the United States or Europe. But, after rebels ousted Syrian President Bashar al-Assad in December 2024, the UN noted that 196,000 Syrian refugees had left the Hashemite Kingdom and returned home. Since the Syrian refugee population in Jordan continues to decline, it makes little sense that U.S. assistance to Jordan has only increased. Republicans have long justified assistance to Jordan in part due to Amman’s 1994 peace treaty with Israel. Jordan and Egypt—the only Arab countries to maintain ties with Israel for much of its history—received the most U.S. assistance among Arab states despite being wealthier than Yemen and Sudan. But the U.S.-brokered 2020 normalization agreements with additional Arab states, including Morocco, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates, make Jordan’s diplomatic relations with Israel less unique. While King Abdullah maintains security cooperation with Israel, Jordan’s ties with the Jewish state are at a low point after recalling its ambassador from Tel Aviv and suspending a water-for-energy agreement in 2023, in protest of the Gaza war. Furthermore, if lawmakers on Capitol Hill are moving to end aid to Israel itself, then it makes little sense for Jordan to keep receiving such a massive amount of U.S. assistance because of its relations with the Jewish state. There were harsh criticisms of the aid to Jordan on social media. Why in the HELL are we sending billions to Jordan? https://t.co/efxm4M6n1z — Hodgetwins (@hodgetwins) July 20, 2026 CUT OFF ALL FOREIGN AID, WE ARE 37 TRILLION IN DEBT. https://t.co/ahj7ziYdP6 — David Cassidy (@davidcassidy26) July 20, 2026 The GOP just voted to continue to give the country of Jordan $2B/year. Thomas Massie and 5 other Republicans were the only ones to vote against it. We are so freaking cooked. https://t.co/XnSq8uT0C7 — Evan Kilgore (@EvanAKilgore) July 20, 2026 Countries that are almost 40 trillion dollars in debt shouldn't be sending taxpayer dollars to any country for whatever reason. It's like a guy buying rounds of drinks for the whole bar while filing for bankruptcy https://t.co/2wCQ6iPKhN — Steve Ferguson (@lsferguson) July 20, 2026 All foreign aid, regardless of who it’s going to, be it Egypt, Israel, Jordan, Ukraine, or Taiwan must be ended. https://t.co/12ZT25lMvt — Michael the Libertarian ☭⃠ (@Bl00dOld) July 19, 2026 Massie also introduced an amendment to end aid to Israel, which failed to pass. He was the lone Republican to vote for the amendment. “I was the only Republican to vote for my amendment to cut $3.3 billion of welfare to Israel. The GOP can’t seriously claim to be America First,” Massie said. I was the only Republican to vote for my amendment to cut $3.3 billion of welfare to Israel. The GOP can’t seriously claim to be America First. pic.twitter.com/m0BqB5RApz — Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) July 19, 2026 Roll Call shared further: Massie’s amendment would have prohibited any of the funding in the bill from being used for Israel. The amendment would have also cut $3.3 billion included in the bill for Israel from the Foreign Military Financing program. The amendment split Democratic leadership, opening up simmering wounds within the party over Israel. Opponents of the amendment, such as Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., argued it was overly broad and would restrict humanitarian aid, while supporters, such as Minority Whip Katherine M. Clark, D-Mass., said it was important to send a message that the status quo is unacceptable. Ultimately, the amendment was rejected 104-314. In addition to the Israel amendment, the House rejected another Massie amendment to prohibit funding for Jordan in a 6-421 vote and one from Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, to ban funding for the United Nations in a 136-291 vote. One amendment from Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., that was approved by voice vote would withhold 100 percent of funding for Nigeria until the State Department certifies that the country is “taking effective steps to prevent and respond to violence and hold perpetrators accountable,” among other criteria. While the amendment itself did not specify the nature of the violence, Steube posted on social media that it was intended to address anti-Christian violence. Republicans have claimed that sectarian violence in the country is targeting Christians, but experts say the reality is more complicated. The House had originally planned to vote on the spending bill last month but was forced to scrap that plan when the floor became frozen over an unrelated fight among Republicans on the voter ID bill and immigration policies. The post “End The Welfare” – GOP Congressman Says United States Sends $2 Billion To Jordan Each Year And Country’s King Spent $100 Million On “Luxury Properties” appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.