100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed

100 Percent Fed Up Feed

@100percentfedupfeed

“Dealing With A Malady” – Bill O’Reilly Discloses Illness
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

“Dealing With A Malady” – Bill O’Reilly Discloses Illness

Former Fox News host Bill O’Reilly announced on his website that he’s dealing with an unspecified illness. “Hey No Spin Nation. Sorry I am dealing with a malady. We have great doctors so we’ll fight the good fight. Doesn’t affect my fingers so will update you on me, news cycle, and anything major. Hopefully, back in the saddle shortly,” O’Reilly said. Veteran television host Bill O’Reilly announced that he had an unspecified illness in an update on his website. pic.twitter.com/o4nuTR95gc — NEWSMAX (@NEWSMAX) January 21, 2026 Daily Caller shared further: “No Spin News” is O’Reilly’s show he conducts on weeknights. He regularly appears on NewsNation and is best known for hosting Fox News’ “The O’Reilly Factor,” according to Brittanica. Fox News fired O’Reilly in April 2017 amid a slew of sexual harassment allegations, which he has denied. “It is tremendously disheartening that we part ways due to completely unfounded claims,” he wrote in a subsequent statement. “But that is the unfortunate reality many of us in the public eye must live with today.” O’Reilly debuted “No Spin News” in August 2017, according to Reuters. He has maintained a long-term relationship with President Donald Trump and appeared with him at the Sept. 11, 2025, New York Yankees game. “As we predicted Monday, President Trump is not going to send troops to Greenland. He made the announcement today. So, how did I know that when most other media were waxing hysterical?” O’Reilly said on Wednesday as part of his “Message of the Day.” As we predicted Monday, President Trump is not going to send troops to Greenland. He made the announcement today. So, how did I know that when most other media were waxing hysterical?https://t.co/aB4Q8jHwH8 — Bill O'Reilly (@BillOReilly) January 21, 2026 O’Reilly wrote on his website: Donald Trump uses a “process” when negotiating. It’s not the same for every situation, but if you understand his goal, the chaos involved makes sense. Here’s the key: the other side gets hammered, and it’s a relief when the deal is made. Glad that’s over! I fully expect Greenland will be overseen by the USA. No downside for Denmark, big tactical advantage for America. Next up, a ferocious campaign to bring consumer prices down. Can’t wait to see how the President will attack that. Can only tell you it won’t be with troops.

IS HE HIGH? Gavin Newsom Unable To Speak Coherently At Davos
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

IS HE HIGH? Gavin Newsom Unable To Speak Coherently At Davos

Is something wrong with Gavin Newsom? Wait, don’t answer that… I mean, is something more wrong than usual? Because everyone is noticing his very strange interview with CNN today where he seemed unable to speak coherently, with his eyes darting everywhere. It did not look good. See for yourself here: Backup video here: BREAKING: Americans are speculating Gavin Newsom is on something in Davos after Trump’s speech – unable to speak coherently, darting his eyes all over the room and erupting in rage Something is seriously wrong with this snake. He must lose 2028.pic.twitter.com/BU5JvjwSKK — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) January 21, 2026 Your thoughts?

WATCH: President Trump’s Historic FULL SPEECH At Davos — 1/21/26
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

WATCH: President Trump’s Historic FULL SPEECH At Davos — 1/21/26

Earlier today, President Trump gave perhaps his best and most historic speech of all time in Davos at the World Economic Forum. Yes, essentially the heart of the Lion’s Den.  Surrounded by snakes. He walked in and completely controlled the room and told them all to their faces that the United States was extremely strong, we possess weapons no one has ever seen before, and we’re done subsidizing the world. It was absolutely incredible, and it immediately goes up in the rare company of historic speeches like Ronald Reagan’s “tear down this wall” speech. I’ve been covering clips of it all day, but here’s the full speech in case you missed it. Watch here: Backup here i f needed: FULL TRANSCRIPT: Well, thank you very much, Larry. It’s great to be back in beautiful Davos, Switzerland, and to address so many respected business leaders, so many friends, few enemies, and all of the distinguished guests. It’s a who’s who. I will say that I’ve come to this year’s World Economic Forum with truly phenomenal news from America. Yesterday marked the one-year anniversary of my inauguration. And today, after 12 months back in the White House, our economy is booming, growth is exploding, productivity is surging, investment is soaring, incomes are rising. Inflation has been defeated. Our previously open and dangerous border is closed and virtually impenetrable. And the United States is in the midst of the fastest and most dramatic economic turnaround in our country’s history. Under the Biden administration, America was plagued by the nightmare of stagflation, meaning low growth and high inflation, a recipe for misery, failure, and decline. But now, after just one year of my policies, we are witnessing the exact opposite: virtually no inflation and extraordinarily high economic growth. Growth like I believe you’ll see very shortly our country has never seen before. Perhaps no country has ever seen before. Over the past three months, core inflation has been just 1.6%. Meanwhile, fourth quarter growth is projected to be 5.4%—far greater than anybody other than myself and a few others had predicted. Since the election, the stock market has set 52 all-time high records. So that’s in one year, 52 records, adding $9 trillion in value to retirement accounts, 401(k)s, and people’s savings. People are doing very well. They’re very happy with me. Since my inauguration, we’ve lifted more than 1.2 million people off of food stamps, and after four years in which Biden secured less than $1 trillion of new investment in our country—think of that, $1 trillion, substantially less than that—in four years, we’ve secured commitments for a record-breaking $18 trillion. And we think when the final numbers come out, they’ll be closer to $20 trillion of investment. That’s never been done by any country at any time. Not even close. Just over one year ago, under the radical left Democrats, we were a dead country. Now we are the hottest country anywhere in the world. In fact, the United States economy is on pace to grow at double the rate that was projected by the IMF just last April. And with my growth and tariff policies, it should be much higher. I really believe we can be much higher than that. And this is all great news, and it’s great for all nations. The USA is the economic engine on the planet. And when America booms, the entire world booms. It’s been the history. When it goes bad, it goes bad. The whole—well, you all follow us down and you follow us up. And we’re at a point that we’ve never—I don’t believe we’ve ever been—I never thought we could do it this quickly. My biggest surprise is I thought it would take more than a year, maybe like a year and one month, but it’s happened very quickly. This afternoon, I want to discuss how we have achieved this economic miracle, how we intend to raise living standards for our citizens to levels never seen before, and perhaps how you too and the places where you come from can do much better by following what we’re doing—because certain places in Europe are not even recognizable, frankly, anymore. They’re not recognizable. And we can argue about it, but there’s no argument. Friends come back from different places. I don’t want to insult anybody and say I don’t recognize it. And that’s not in a positive way. That’s in a very negative way. And I love Europe, and I want to see Europe do good. But it’s not heading in the right direction. In recent decades, it became conventional wisdom in Washington and European capitals that the only way to grow a modern Western economy was through ever-increasing government spending, unchecked mass migration, and endless foreign imports. The consensus was that so-called dirty jobs and heavy industry should be sent elsewhere, that affordable energy should be replaced by the Green New Scam, and that countries could be propped up by importing new and entirely different populations from far away lands. This was the path that Sleepy Joe Biden’s administration and many other Western governments very foolishly followed, turning their backs on everything that makes nations rich and powerful and strong. And there’s so much potential in so many nations. The result was record budget and trade deficits and a growing sovereign deficit driven by the largest wave of mass migration in human history. We’ve never seen anything like it. Quite frankly, many parts of our world are being destroyed before our very eyes. And the leaders don’t even understand what’s happening. And the ones that do understand aren’t doing anything about it. Virtually all of the so-called experts predicted my plans to end this failed model would trigger a global recession and runaway inflation. But we have proven them wrong. It’s actually just the opposite. In one year, our agenda has produced a transformation like America has not seen in over 100 years. Instead of closing down energy plants, we’re opening them up. Instead of building ineffective, money-losing windmills, we’re taking them down and not approving any. Instead of empowering bureaucrats, we’re firing them. And they’re going out and getting jobs in the private sector for two and three times what they were making in government. So they started off hating me when we fired them, and now they love me. Instead of raising taxes on domestic producers, we’re lowering them and raising tariffs on foreign nations to pay for the damage that they’ve caused. In 12 months, we have removed over 270,000 bureaucrats from the federal payrolls—the largest single-year reduction in government employment since the end of World War II. Nobody thought that was coming, but we had no choice to make a country great. You can’t have all federal jobs. We’ve cut federal spending by $100 billion and slashed the federal budget deficit by 27% in the single year. It’s going to go down quite a bit more from that, driving inflation way down from the record highs of the Biden administration. Every month they went up and up and up. I promised to cut 10 old regulations for every single new regulation. But instead, I’ve cut—actually till this point—129 regulations for every one new regulation approved. So every time they come in with a new regulation, we do at least 10, but so far it’s averaging out to 129, if you can believe it. In July, we passed the largest tax cuts in American history, including no tax on tips, no tax on overtime, no tax on Social Security for our great seniors. We also provided 100% expensing—that’s the one they like—and bonus depreciation for all new equipment and capital investments to help companies expand and shift production to America. They are so in love with that. They build a plant, they’re able to deduct it immediately, the whole thing, rather than waiting 38 to 41 years in the old days. This is a miracle taking place. Nobody thought it would ever be done by any country, but it’s done by us. It was what made my first term the most successful four-year term that we’ve ever had from a financial standpoint. And now we’ve upped it. This is a 10-year program, not a one-year program, but you’re allowed to deduct everything in one year. Used to be 38 to 41 years. With tariffs, we’ve radically reduced our ballooning trade deficit, which was the largest in world history. We were losing more than $1 trillion dollars every single year. And it was just wasted. It was going to waste. But in one year, I slashed our monthly trade deficit by a staggering 77%. And all of this with no inflation—something everyone said could not be done. There were a couple of brilliant people that actually thought I was doing the right thing. I thought I was doing the right thing. Now they all think I’m doing the right thing because they can’t believe the numbers. American exports are now up by more than $150 billion dollars. Domestic steel production is up by 300,000 tons a month, and it’s doubling over the next four months. It’s doubling and tripling, and we have steel plants being built all over the country. Nobody thought they’d see that. Factory construction is up by 41%. And that number is really going to skyrocket right now because that’s during a process that they’re putting in to get their approvals. And we’ve given very, very quick, fast approvals. In the process, we’ve made historic trade deals with partners covering 40% of all U.S. trade—some of the greatest companies and countries in the world. We have countries as our partner too: the European nations, Japan, South Korea—they’re our partners. They’ve gone into massive deals with us, especially on oil and gas. And these agreements raise growth and cause stock markets to boom, not only in the U.S., but virtually every country that came to make a deal because, as you’ve learned, when the United States goes up, you follow. It’s really become a staple in America. I’ve stopped the nation-wrecking energy policies that drive up prices while sending jobs and factories to the world’s worst polluters. They are indeed polluters under Sleepy Joe Biden. New domestic oil and gas leases fell by 95%. Think of that. Then they wonder, why was gasoline going up so fast? The gasoline actually topped $5 a gallon and some places $7 a gallon. And more than 100 major power plants were violently shut down by incompetent people that had no idea what the hell they were doing. Under my leadership, U.S. natural gas production is at an all-time high by far. U.S. oil production is up by 730,000 barrels a day. And last week, we picked up 50 million barrels from Venezuela alone. Venezuela has been an amazing place for so many years, but then they went bad with their policies. Twenty years ago, it was a great country, and now it’s got problems, but we’re helping them. And those 50 million barrels, we’re going to be splitting up with them, and they’ll be making more money than they’ve made in a long time. Venezuela is going to do fantastically well. We appreciate all of the cooperation we’ve been giving. We’ve been given great cooperation. Once the attack ended, the attack ended, and they said, “Let’s make a deal.” More people should do that. But Venezuela is going to make more money in the next six months than they’ve made in the last 20 years. Every major oil company is coming in with us. It’s amazing. It’s a beautiful thing to see. The leadership of the country has been very good. They’ve been very, very smart. The price of gasoline is now below $2.50 a gallon in many states, $2.30 a gallon in most states, and we’ll soon be averaging less than $2 a gallon. In many places, it’s already down even lower—$1.95 a gallon. Numerous states are at $1.99. Numbers that nobody has heard for years. Actually, since my last administration, we got it down to around those numbers. I’ve signed an order directing an approval of many new nuclear reactors. We’re going heavy into nuclear. I was not a big fan because I didn’t like the risk, the danger, but the progress they’ve made with nuclear is unbelievable. And the safety progress they’ve made is incredible. We’re very much into the world of nuclear energy. And we can have it now at good prices and very, very safe. And we’re leading the world in AI by a lot. We’re leading China by a lot. I think President Xi respects what we’ve done in part because I’ve allowed these big companies building these massive buildings to build their own electric capacity. They’re building their own power plants, which, when added up, is more than any country anywhere in the world is doing. I read recently an article in The Wall Street Journal that China’s creating so much energy, and they are. I got to hand it to them. But we’re creating as much or more, and we’re letting them do that. I’m very proud of it. It was my idea. They said, “You can’t create this much energy. We needed more than double the energy currently in the country just to take care of the AI plants.” And they said, “We can’t do that. We have an old grid system.” And I came up with the idea: you know, you people are brilliant. You have a lot of money. Let’s see what you can do. You can build your own electric generating plants. And they looked at me, they didn’t believe me. All of the names that are in, I think, in the room right now, if you want to know the truth, they didn’t believe it. And I said, “No, no, you can’t.” They came back two weeks and they didn’t have the plant. They said, “We thought you were kidding.” I said, “No, not only am I not kidding, you’re going to have your approvals within two weeks.” I always say nuclear will take three weeks, but most aren’t going that. They’re going oil and gas. They’re even going coal in some cases. Because of my landslide election victory, the United States avoided the catastrophic energy collapse which befell every European nation that pursued the Green New Scam—perhaps the greatest hoax in history. The Green New Scam. Windmills all over the place. Destroy your land. Destroy your land. Every time that goes around, you lose $1,000. You’re supposed to make money with energy, not lose money. Here in Europe, we’ve seen the fate that the radical left tried to impose on America. They tried very hard. Germany now generates 22% less electricity than it did in 2017. And it’s not the current chancellor’s fault. He’s solving the problem. He’s going to do a great job. But what they did before he got there—I guess that’s why he got there. And electricity prices are 64% higher. The United Kingdom produces just one-third of the total energy from all sources that it did in 1999. Think of that—one-third. And they’re sitting on top of the North Sea, one of the greatest reserves anywhere in the world. But they don’t use it. And that’s one reason why their energy has reached catastrophically low levels with equally high prices. High prices, very low levels. Think of that—one-third—and you’re sitting on top of the North Sea. And they like to say, well, you know, that’s depleted. It’s not depleted. It’s got 500 years. They haven’t even found the oil. The North Sea is incredible. They don’t let anybody drill. Environmentally, they don’t let them drill. They make it impossible for the oil companies to go. They take 92% of the revenues. So the oil company said, we can’t do it. They came to see me. “Is there anything you can do?” I want Europe to do great. I want the U.K. to do great. Sitting on one of the greatest energy sources in the world and they don’t use it. In fact, their electricity prices have soared 139%. There are windmills all over Europe. There are windmills all over the place and they are losers. One thing I’ve noticed is that the more windmills a country has, the more money that country loses and the worse that country is doing. China makes almost all of the windmills. And yet I haven’t been able to find any wind farms in China. Did you ever think of that? It’s a good way of looking at it—they’re smart. China is very smart. They make them. They sell them for a fortune. They sell them to the stupid people that buy them, but they don’t use them themselves. They put up a couple of big wind farms, but they don’t use them. They just put them up to show people what they could look like. They don’t spin. They don’t do anything. They use a thing called coal mostly. But China goes with the coal. They go with oil and gas. They’re starting to look at nuclear a little bit, and they’re doing just fine. They make a fortune selling the windmills, though. And I think, really, that’s one—they wouldn’t be surprised if it stopped. They are shocked that it continues to go. They’re very friendly with me. They’re shocked that people continue to buy those damn things. They kill the birds. They ruin your landscapes. Other than that, I think they’re fabulous. By the way, stupid people buy them. The consequences of such destructive policies have been stark, including lower economic growth, lower standards of living, lower birth rates, more socially disruptive migration, more vulnerability to hostile foreign adversaries, and much, much smaller militaries. The United States cares greatly about the people of Europe. We really do. I mean, look, I am derived from Europe: Scotland and Germany. 100% Scotland—my mother. 100% German—my father. And we believe deeply in the bonds we share with Europe as a civilization. I want to see it do great. That’s why issues like energy, trade, immigration, and economic growth must be central concerns to anyone who wants to see a strong and united West, because Europe and those countries have to do their thing. They have to get out of the culture that they’ve created over the last 10 years. It’s horrible what they’re doing to themselves. They’re destroying themselves. It’s beautiful, beautiful places. We want strong allies, not seriously weakened ones. We want Europe to be strong. Ultimately, these are matters of national security, and perhaps no current issue makes the situation more clear than what’s currently going on with Greenland. Would you like me to say a few words of Greenland? I was going to leave it out of the speech, but I thought I think I would have been reviewed very negatively. I have tremendous respect for both the people of Greenland and the people of Denmark. Tremendous respect. But every NATO ally has an obligation to be able to defend their own territory. And the fact is, no nation or group of nations is in any position to be able to secure Greenland other than the United States. We’re a great power, much greater than people even understand. I think they found that out two weeks ago in Venezuela. We saw this in World War II when Denmark fell to Germany after just six hours of fighting and was totally unable to defend either itself or Greenland. So the United States was then compelled—we did it, we felt an obligation to do it—to send our own forces to hold the Greenland territory. And hold it we did at great cost and expense. They didn’t have a chance of getting on it, and they tried. Denmark knows that. We literally set up bases on Greenland for Denmark. We fought for Denmark. We weren’t fighting for anyone else. We were fighting to save it for Denmark. Big beautiful piece of ice. It’s hard to call it land. It’s our big piece of ice. But we saved Greenland and successfully prevented our enemies from gaining a foothold in our hemisphere. So we did it for ourselves also. And then after the war, which we won, we won it big—without us right now, you’d all be speaking German and a little Japanese perhaps—after the war, we gave Greenland back to Denmark. How stupid were we to do that? But we did it. But we gave it back. But how ungrateful are they now? So now our country and the world face much greater risks than it did ever before because of missiles, because of nuclear, because of weapons of warfare that I can’t even talk about. Two weeks ago, they saw weapons that nobody ever heard of. They weren’t able to fire one shot at us. They said, “What happened?” Everything was discombobulated. They said, “We’ve got them in our sights. Press the trigger.” And nothing happened. No anti-aircraft missiles went up. There was one that went up about 30 feet and crashed down right next to the people that sent it. They said, “What the hell is going on?” Those defensive systems were made by Russia and by China. So they’re going to go back to the drawing boards. I guess Greenland is a vast, almost entirely uninhabited and undeveloped territory that’s sitting undefended in a key strategic location between the United States, Russia, and China. That’s exactly where it is, right smack in the middle. Wasn’t important nearly when we gave it back. You know, when we gave it back, wasn’t the same as it is now. It’s not important for any other reason—you know, everyone talks about the minerals. There’s so many—there’s no rare earth. No such thing as rare earth. There’s rare processing, but there’s so much rare earth. And to get to this rare earth, you got to go through hundreds of feet of ice. That’s not the reason we need it. We need it for strategic national security and international security. This enormous unsecured island is actually part of North America on the northern frontier of the Western Hemisphere. That’s our territory. It is therefore a core national security interest of the United States of America. And in fact, it’s been our policy for hundreds of years to prevent outside threats from entering our hemisphere. And we’ve done it very successfully. We’ve never been stronger than we are now. That’s why American presidents have sought to purchase Greenland for nearly two centuries. You know, for two centuries, they’ve been trying to do it. They should have kept it after World War II, but they had a different president. That’s all right. People think differently. Much more necessary now than it was at that time, however. In 2019, Denmark said that they would spend over $200 million to strengthen Greenland’s defenses. But as you know, they spent less than 1% of that amount. 1%. There’s no sign of Denmark there. And I say that with great respect for Denmark, whose people I love, whose leaders are very good. It’s the United States alone that can protect this giant mass of land, this giant piece of ice, develop it, and improve it, and make it so that it’s good for Europe and safe for Europe and good for us. And that’s the reason I’m seeking immediate negotiations to once again discuss the acquisition of Greenland by the United States, just as we have acquired many other territories throughout our history, as many of the European nations have. They’ve acquired—there’s nothing wrong with it. Many of them—some went in reverse actually if you look. Some had great vast wealth, great vast lands all over the world. They went in reverse. They’re stuck back where they started. That happens, too. But some grow. But this would not be a threat to NATO. This would greatly enhance the security of the entire alliance. The NATO alliance. The United States is treated very unfairly by NATO. I want to tell you that. And when you think about it, nobody can dispute it. We give so much and we get so little in return. And I’ve been a critic of NATO for many years. And yet I’ve done more to help NATO than any other president by far, than any other person. You wouldn’t have NATO if I didn’t get involved in my first term. The war with Ukraine is an example. We are thousands of miles away, separated by a giant ocean. It’s a war that should have never started, and it wouldn’t have started if the 2020 U.S. presidential election weren’t rigged. It was a rigged election. Everybody now knows that—they found out. People will soon be prosecuted for what they did. It’s probably breaking news, but it should be. It was a rigged election. Can’t have rigged elections. You need strong borders, strong elections, and ideally a good press. I always say it: strong borders, strong elections, free, fair elections, and a fair media. The media is terrible. It’s very crooked. It’s very biased—terrible—but someday it’ll straighten out because it’s losing all credibility. Think of it. When I win in a landslide, a giant landslide—won all seven swing states, won the popular vote, won everything—and they only get negative press. That means that it has no credibility. And if they’re going to get credibility, they’re going to have to be fair. So, you need a fair press, but you also need those other elements. And I inherited a terrible, terrible situation. If you look, the border was open. The inflation was raging. Everything was bad with the United States when I came into office. But I also inherited a mess with Ukraine and Russia—something that would have never happened. And I know Putin very well. He and I would discuss Ukraine. It was the apple of his eye. But he wasn’t going to do anything. I said, “Vladimir, you’re not doing it.” He would never have done it. It was terrible what happened. I could see it happening, too. After I left, I could see it happening. Biden had given Ukraine and NATO $350 billion, a staggering sum. $350 billion. I came in and just like the southern border, just like inflation, just like our economy, I said, “Wow, this place is in trouble,” meaning our country. All of these things were out of control. But the border was out of control. We fixed it with the strongest border anywhere in the world. And I’ve now been working on this war for one year, during which time I settled eight other wars. India, Pakistan. I mean, I settled other wars. Vladimir Putin called me—Armenia, Azerbaijan. He said, “I can’t believe you settled that one. They were going on for 35 years.” I settled it in one day. Then President Putin called me. He said, “You know, I can’t believe—I’ve worked on that war for 10 years trying to settle it. I couldn’t do it.” I said, “Do me a favor. Focus on settling your war. Don’t worry about that one.” What does the United States get out of all of this work, all of this money other than death, destruction, and massive amounts of cash going to people who don’t appreciate what we do? They don’t appreciate what we do—talking about NATO. I’m talking about Europe. They have to work on Ukraine. We don’t. The United States is very far away. We have a big beautiful ocean separating us. We have nothing to do with it. Until I came along, NATO was only supposed to pay 2% of GDP. But they weren’t paying. Most of the countries weren’t paying anything. The United States was paying for virtually 100% of NATO. And I got that stopped. I said that’s not fair. But then more importantly, I got NATO to pay 5%, and now they were paying and now they are paying. So something nobody said was possible. They said we will never go up higher than 2%. But they went to 5%, and now they’re paying the five. They didn’t pay the two, and now they’re paying the five, and they’re stronger for it. And they have an excellent, by the way, secretary general who’s possibly in the room. Mark, are you here? Yes, he’s here. Hello, Mark. We never asked for anything and we never got anything. We probably won’t get anything unless I decide to use excessive strength and force, where we would be, frankly, unstoppable. But I won’t do that. Okay, now everyone’s saying, “Oh, good.” That’s probably the biggest statement I made because people thought I would use force. I don’t have to use force. I don’t want to use force. I won’t use force. All the United States is asking for is a place called Greenland, where we already had it as a trustee, but respectfully returned it back to Denmark not long ago after we defeated the Germans, the Japanese, the Italians, and others in World War II. We gave it back to them. We were a powerful force then, but we are a much more powerful force now. After I rebuilt the military in my first term and continue to do so today, we have a budget of $1.5 trillion. We’re bringing back battleships. The battleship is 100 times more powerful than the great battleships you saw in World War II—those great big gorgeous ships, the Missouri, the Iowa, the Alabama—because they thought maybe we could take them out of mothballs. They said, “No, sir. These ships are 100—think of that—100 times more powerful than those big, big magnificent pieces of art that you saw so many times ago that you still see on television. You say, ‘Wow, what a force.’” One hundred times. Each ship 100 times more powerful than the big battleships of the past. So that was the end of the mothball story. So what we have gotten out of NATO is nothing except to protect Europe from the Soviet Union and now Russia. I mean, we’ve helped them for so many years. We’ve never gotten anything except we pay for NATO, and we paid for many years until I came along. We paid for, in my opinion, 100% of NATO because they weren’t paying their bills. And all we’re asking for is to get Greenland, including right title and ownership, because you need the ownership to defend it. You can’t defend it on a lease. Number one, legally it’s not defensible that way totally. And number two, psychologically, who the hell wants to defend a license agreement or a lease, which is a large piece of ice in the middle of the ocean where, if there is a war, much of the action will take place on that piece of ice. Think of it. Those missiles would be flying right over the center of that piece of ice. All we want from Denmark for national and international security and to keep our very energetic and dangerous potential enemies at bay is this land on which we’re going to build the greatest Golden Dome ever built. We’re building a Golden Dome that’s going to, just by its very nature, be defending Canada. Canada gets a lot of freebies from us, by the way. They should be grateful also, but they’re not. I watched your prime minister yesterday. He wasn’t so grateful, but they should be grateful to us. Canada—Canada lives because of the United States. Remember that, Mark, the next time you make your statements. What we did for Israel was amazing. But that’s nothing compared to what we have planned for the United States, Canada, and the rest of the world. We are going to build a dome like no other. We did it. We did it for Israel. And by the way, I told Bibi, “Stop taking credit for the dome. That’s our technology. That’s our stuff.” But they had a lot of courage and they were good fighters and they did a good job. And we wiped out the Iran nuclear threat like nobody can believe. Nobody’s ever seen anything like it. That Venezuela—taking down Soleimani, wiping out al-Baghdadi when he tried to reinstitute ISIS—we did a lot. I did a lot, a lot of big things. All perfectly executed. Everyone was perfectly executed. Somebody told me that—a military expert told me—“Sir, everything you’ve done has been perfectly executed.” I said, “I know.” So other presidents have spent, whether foolishly or not, trillions and trillions of dollars on NATO and gotten absolutely nothing in return. We’ve never asked for anything. It’s always a one-way street. Now they want us to help them with Ukraine, and we say we’re going to—I’m really helping not even them. I want to see—last week, if you saw it, it was 10,000 soldiers, but last month it was 31,000 soldiers died. 31,000. That’s this room times the number of people in this room times 30. Think of it—30,000 soldiers died in one month. The month before it was 27,000. The month before that it was 28,000. The month before that it was 25,000. It’s a bloodbath over there. And that’s what I want to stop. Doesn’t help the United States. But these are souls. These are young, young people—look like you, look like some of you right in the front row. They go to war. Their parents are so proud. “Oh, there he goes.” Comes back. Two weeks later, they get a call: your son’s head’s been blown off. I want to stop it. It’s a horrible war. It’s the worst since World War II. They keep going, they’ll exceed World War II. The numbers are staggering how many people they’ve lost. They don’t want to talk about it. Ukraine and Russia lost just tremendous amounts. And I’m dealing with President Putin and he wants to make a deal. I believe—I’m dealing with President Zelensky and I think he wants to make a deal. I’m meeting him today. He might be in the audience right now. But they got to get that war stopped because too many people are dying—needlessly dying. Too many souls are being lost. It’s the only reason I’m interested in doing it. But in doing it, I’m helping Europe. I’m helping NATO. When I—and I’ve—until the last few days when I told them about Iceland, they loved me. They called me daddy, right, last time. Very smart man said, “He’s our daddy. He’s running it.” I was like running it. I went from running it to being a terrible human being. But now what I’m asking for is a piece of ice—cold and poorly located—that can play a vital role in world peace and world protection. It’s a very small ask compared to what we have given them for many, many decades. It reminded me so much of this iconic speech from 2018…. Do you remember this? FLASHBACK: When Trump Walked Into the Lion’s Den And RENOUNCED Globalism To Their Face! This is a flashback to one of my favorite moments from 2018. I love this President more and more every day! My friends, you have to understand how truly amazing it is for him to walk into the United Nations and deliver this speech! The man has no fear and a set of big, huge brass balls! As he stood there in the Lion's Den, he delivered a scathing speech to the U.N., denouncing their authority and firmly destroying their idea of globalism! Here are my favorite quotes: "We will never surrender America's sovereignty to an unelected, unaccountable global beaurocracy! America is governed by Americans! We reject the ideology of globalism and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism!" Watch and enjoy: Please SHARE this everywhere! I believe if all Americans would watch just this one clip, it would win Trump 100% re-election in the biggest margin of all time!

House Committee Votes To Hold Clintons In Contempt Of Congress
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

House Committee Votes To Hold Clintons In Contempt Of Congress

The House Oversight Committee has voted to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas related to the panel’s Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The GOP-controlled committee advanced the contempt resolutions against the Clintons for a full House vote, which should take place within weeks. Several Democrat lawmakers joined Republicans to vote in favor of the contempt resolutions. “Today was a big day for accountability,” House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer (R-KY) said. “We had a bipartisan vote today to hold the Clintons in contempt of Congress. This shows that no one is above the law,” he added. Check it out: Oversight Holds the Clintons in Contempt of Congress for Defying Lawful Subpoenas Chairman @RepJamesComer: "Today was a big day for accountability … We had a bipartisan vote to hold the Clintons in contempt of Congress. This shows that no one is above the law." pic.twitter.com/91NFv60LaK — Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) January 21, 2026 Fox News has more: The committee voted 34-8 to advance one contempt recommendation against Bill Clinton, with two members voting present, and another on Hillary Clinton in a 28-15 vote, with one member voting present. Nine Democrats voted with Republicans to advance contempt recommendations against Bill Clinton and three Democrats joined Republicans in the vote against Hillary Clinton. The Democrats who voted to advance Bill Clinton’s resolution were: Reps. Maxwell Frost, D-Fla., Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., Summer Lee, D-Pa., Stephen Lynch, D-Mass. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass., Emily Randall, D-Wash., Lateefah Simon, D-Calif., Melanie Stansbury, D-N.M., and Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich. The Democrats who voted to advance Hillary Clinton’s resolution were Stansbury and “Squad” members Lee and Tlaib. “The committee does not take this action lightly. Subpoenas are not mere suggestions,” Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., said of the Clintons’ no-show. “[Subpoenas] carry the force of law and require compliance. Former President Clinton and Secretary Clinton were legally required to appear for depositions before this committee.” “They refused,” he added. If the House votes to refer the Clintons for contempt, it would be up to the Department of Justice (DOJ) whether to prosecute. A contempt-of-Congress conviction can carry up to a $100,000 fine and a year behind bars. “Bill Clinton seems to think he’s above the law and refused to show for his deposition today. @GOPoversight will begin contempt of Congress proceedings against former President Clinton for his failure to appear before Congress after a historic bipartisan subpoena,” the House Oversight Committee previously stated. Bill Clinton seems to think he's above the law and refused to show for his deposition today.@GOPoversight will begin contempt of Congress proceedings against former President Clinton for his failure to appear before Congress after a historic bipartisan subpoena. pic.twitter.com/zx1GXDX9bE — Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) January 13, 2026 USA TODAY shared further: Once the matter comes to a full House vote, it will force more Democrats to choose if they want to publicly defend two of their party’s former standard-bearers, whose past ties to Epstein have come under increased scrutiny. Newly unearthed photos of Bill Clinton with the disgraced wealth manager have undercut the party’s criticisms of President Donald Trump and his own previous connections to Epstein, who died in jail awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Only one chamber of Congress has to vote to recommend contempt charges – which can lead to fines and jail time – to the Justice Department. The Clintons, who have urged the full release of the so-called “Epstein files,” have repeatedly denied wrongdoing and argued the subpoenas imposed on them by Republicans are “legally unenforceable.” (Trump has also denied any wrongdoing related to his relationship with Epstein.) Still, the Clintons engaged in talks with congressional lawyers over the course of five months and offered to meet with the committee. But those negotiations broke down after conflicting accounts emerged about whether the pair was amenable to an official transcript of their testimony. “The response we received was not cooperation, but defiance marked by repeated delays, excuses and obstruction,” Rep. James Comer, R-Kentucky, the chair of the House Oversight Committee, said ahead of the panel’s vote.

President Trump SCORCHES Mark Carney: “Remember that Mark, the next time you make your statements…”
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

President Trump SCORCHES Mark Carney: “Remember that Mark, the next time you make your statements…”

I have never liked news articles that used headlines like “So and So DUNKS ON So and So” or “So and So DESTROYS So and So”…. They all just seem so corny and dumb to me. No one “dunked on” anyone, this is not Michael Jordan going over the top of Dikembe Mutombo.  We’re not playing basketball so stop with all the stupid “dunked on” headlines. But in this case, while I’m not going to use the (stupid) phrase “dunked on” I am going to say President Trump just scorched Mark Carney….and very deservedly so! Canada exists at the will and pleasure of the United States of America and they seem to have forgotten that. Mark Carney in particular has gone very far out over his skis and he’s about to come tumbling down. President Trump just called him out on that and what jumped out most to me was not the scolding President Trump just gave him but the complete lack of respect by calling him “Mark”. Folks, that was very intentional. And it was not a faux pax. That is President Trump telegraphing to “Mark” that he is not even worthy of the title he holds, and he is certainly not viewed by President Trump as someone worthy of holding that title. No, he’s just “Mark” and even that was said was complete disdain and lack of respect.  And all rightfully so. Watch here: Trump is going absolutely scorched earth in Davos. “Canada lives because of the United States, remember that Mark, the next time you make your statements.” pic.twitter.com/hUbwhlSzlW — Steven Crowder (@scrowder) January 21, 2026 Backup here if needed: HOLY CRAP! Trump just ROASTED Canada PM Mark Carney to his face for acting ungrateful to the U.S. “Canada EXISTS because of America — don’t forget that, Mark, next time you run your mouth.” “I watched your PM yesterday… not an ounce of gratitude.” Vintage Trump. pic.twitter.com/uSJKgPqtMo — Charlie’s Voice Rising (@CharlieK_news) January 21, 2026 I’m surprised he didn’t go all the way and call them America’s Hat! Or ask if they plan to defend themselves with Maple Syrup and Flannel Shirts! If you’re going to hit them, go all in! But then again, Mark Carney is not even really Canadian! Do you know his history? He served as the head of the Bank of England from 2013-2020! How can you run the Bank of England and then pop up a few years later running a different country? The answer of course is simple….because he was “installed” there. It’s like the Jewish lady currently running Mexico. You really mean to tell me the Mexicans elected a Jewish lady to run their country? Give me a break! And weren’t there like 37 politicians killed in that election before she suddenly won? Because that’s not weird or anything, is it? RELATED REPORT: FACT-CHECK: Did 37 Candidates Running Against Mexico’s New President Claudia Sheinbaum All Get Assassinated? EDITOR'S NOTE: With Mexico's President Claudia Sheinbaum (the President of Mexico is Jewish?) suddenly in the news a lot and only increasing as President Trump retakes office in January 2025, I thought it might be time to revisit exactly HOW she got into office.  Remember this? Talk about a wild story! I first saw this circulating around yesterday and I couldn't believe it was true, so I had to do my own Fact-Checking....you know, the real kind that is actually concerned with Facts and not just pushing an agenda like the "Facebook Fact-Checkers". So I did and I'll share the results with you in just a moment -- might not be what you expect! But first let's take a moment to pause and realize Mexico just elected a woman President. In fact, it's Mexico's first woman President, so that's historic. Not only that, but she's also Jewish as you might surmise from the heavily Jewish name "Sheinbaum"....although she "plays down" her heritage: I'm not making any value judgments on any of that, but I have to say I never would have expected Mexico to elect a Jewish Woman as their next President. Or should I say "El Presidenté!" Wait, or is that "La Presidente?" Can someone educate me in the comments below? Anyway, back to our story.... I never would have expected Mexico to elect a Jewish Woman as their next President.....and maybe they didn't!  At least, that is, if reports of 37 other candidates being assassinated is accurate. 37! Let that sink in. So, is that true? Well, I'll start with Dom Lucre's Tweet which is the first I saw of the news: ??BREAKING: Mexico’s new President Claudia Sheinbaum is going viral for winning the ‘Mexican Presidential Hunger Games.’ President Sheinbaum won her election with the miracle of not being touched or targeted while 37 other candidates were assassinated. She is considered the… pic.twitter.com/xJbFI8GmMw — Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) June 4, 2024 So is Dom just looking for attention and clicks? Well, you can see he has a Community Note added there which we will get to in a minute, but the story is real in many respects. Here is Yahoo News: Claudia Sheinbaum was elected Mexico's first female president after a bloody election campaign that saw 37 candidates assassinated. https://t.co/9MQk36VyW2 — Yahoo Canada News (@YahooCanadaNews) June 3, 2024 Claudia Sheinbaum was elected as Mexico's first female president Sunday following the deadliest election campaign in the country's modern history. More than three dozen candidates were assassinated, including a local government candidate in central Puebla state who was killed on Friday, increasing the total number of those killed to 37 ahead of Sunday’s vote, according to data from security consultancy Integralia obtained by Reuters. Across the country, there were more than 20,000 positions to fill and 70,000 candidates vying for the spots. Why is this election so important? One of the top issues in this year’s presidential contest was violent crime. Outgoing President Andrés Manuel López Obrador has had to account for a persistently high murder rate, with his opposition arguing for change. Security analyst David Saucedo told the Associated Press that drug cartels will likely try to force voters to support their favored candidates. Cartels are becoming increasingly dangerous — they’re now well-armed and politically influential. According to a report translated by NPR, more than 30,000 people are murdered each year in Mexico, compared to roughly 18,500 in the U.S. in 2023. Ok, so now let's examine the Community Note and see what they are saying: Grok actually confirms this is true.... So let's sum it all up.... Yes, it's true that 37 candidates in the election were assassinated or killed, which is absolutely stunning in itself.  But none of those 37 were running for President, they were running for other offices. So, is the headline true? Not exactly. And definitely not to suggest that La Presidenta Elect Claudia Sheinbaum had that killed.