100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed

100 Percent Fed Up Feed

@100percentfedupfeed

VIDEO: Commonwealth Games Final Stopped Cold After 19-Year-Old Gymnast’s Terrifying Fall
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

VIDEO: Commonwealth Games Final Stopped Cold After 19-Year-Old Gymnast’s Terrifying Fall

A Commonwealth Games medal final went from roaring noise to stunned silence in a matter of seconds. England gymnast Gabriel Langton was in the final rotation of the men’s team competition in Glasgow when he missed his catch on the high bar and plunged toward the mat. The 19-year-old came down head and neck first. Medical personnel rushed onto the floor, the competition stopped, and a packed arena watched in near silence as Langton was stabilized and taken away on a stretcher. The footage is difficult to watch. NEWS: English gymnast Gabriel Langton has been rushed to hospital after suffering a major fall during the Commonwealth Games pic.twitter.com/bXsMusO5fF — Basil the Great (@BasilTheGreat) July 25, 2026 Now for the most important update: Langton was conscious, moving, and speaking with doctors after the fall, according to team officials. Team England confirmed that Langton suffered a bad fall on the high bar and was treated by medical staff before being taken to the hospital. The incident caused a lengthy delay in the final. England had begun well on floor, fought through pommel horse, rings, and vault, and posted the best team total on parallel bars before the competition reached its final apparatus. Langton’s teammates Luke Whitehouse, Josh Nathan, Adam Tobin, and Alex Yolshin-Cash then had to regroup and finish with no immediate certainty about their teammate’s condition. The remaining gymnasts took another warm-up before returning to the high bar. They did exactly that, holding on for the silver medal behind Canada. Australia finished with bronze. Whitehouse praised the coaches and said the team’s togetherness showed under brutal circumstances. Nathan called the day a rollercoaster and made clear that the medal celebration came second to concern for Langton. Team England thanked the medical personnel who responded immediately and said another update would be shared when more information became available. Reuters reported that Langton was fitted with head and neck support before being transported to the hospital for further assessment. The fall happened in the final rotation after Langton came off the horizontal bar and crashed headfirst. Medical personnel treated him on the competition floor for several minutes before carefully moving him onto a stretcher. The outlet cited team officials who said he was conscious, moving, and talking with doctors. Those are encouraging facts after an accident that looked every bit as serious as the reaction inside the arena suggested. Team England said it was grateful to the medical teams that responded immediately. At the time of the report, the organization had not announced a diagnosis and said Langton remained at the hospital for assessment. Reuters also reported that Langton had been called into England’s squad as a replacement for injured six-time Olympic medalist Max Whitlock. That late opportunity placed the young gymnast on one of the biggest stages of his career. It ended with his teammates carrying a silver medal while their thoughts remained somewhere else entirely. ️ Luke Whitehouse provided an update after his gymnastics team-mate Gabriel Langton suffered a bad fall during the Commonwealth Games men's team final. England went on to win a silver medal in the event. pic.twitter.com/PRTzX2Mv88 — BBC Sport (@BBCSport) July 24, 2026 Whitehouse said the team had heard Langton was doing okay, then put into words what every viewer had just seen. Gymnastics is dangerous. Elite athletes train for years to make impossible-looking movements appear controlled, but the margin between a clean routine and a medical emergency can disappear in an instant. The Guardian reported that Langton initially lay motionless during the final rotation of the tightly contested team event before responding to medical staff, moving his legs and later his hands. About a dozen medical personnel carefully stabilized him on the competition floor. Roughly 11 minutes passed before he was lifted onto the stretcher, according to the report. The crowd then applauded as he was carried from the arena, with England still locked in a close fight with Canada for gold. Whitehouse faced the awful task of competing on the same apparatus immediately after the delay. He completed his routine but lost his balance on the dismount, while Yolshin-Cash followed with a composed high-bar performance that secured a place in the individual final. Canada was narrowly ahead when the accident occurred, meaning the final eventually resumed with both the medals and the gymnasts’ safety weighing over every remaining routine. England finished with 238.250 points. Canada won the title with 241.400, while Australia claimed bronze with 235.650. Those scores tell the official story of the competition. They do not come close to capturing what Langton’s teammates had to do after watching a friend suffer a frightening fall and then climbing onto the same apparatus to finish the job. This was not Langton’s first appearance on a major international stage. British Gymnastics documented his breakthrough at the 2024 Junior European Championships, where he helped Great Britain win team gold and captured bronze in the individual all-around competition. Langton scored 79.564 across six apparatus in the all-around final. His day included a 13.866 on vault, a 13.500 on parallel bars, and a 12.833 on the high bar—the same apparatus that would produce Friday’s frightening scene two years later. He also won silver on rings in Rimini and completed his junior European career with five medals across two championships. British Gymnastics described a poised young athlete who held his nerve through the final rotation to reach the podium. Langton had already fought his way back from an earlier injury before becoming the British under-18 champion. At just 19, he arrived in Glasgow as one of England’s emerging talents with a chance to announce himself at the senior level. His path from a junior comeback to the Commonwealth Games was built over years, not weeks. That history is one reason the concern from teammates, coaches, and gymnastics fans has been so immediate and personal. Instead, the only result that mattered Friday night was the one coming from the hospital. The early update—that Langton was conscious, moving, and speaking—is welcome news. It is not a diagnosis, and there should be no speculation beyond what his team and doctors have confirmed. For now, Gabriel Langton has a silver medal waiting for him. More importantly, he has teammates, competitors, and people around the world hoping the next update is an even better one. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post VIDEO: Commonwealth Games Final Stopped Cold After 19-Year-Old Gymnast’s Terrifying Fall appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Minnesota To Give Taxpayer-Funded Trans Dolls With Removable Genitals To 4-Year-Old Students
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Minnesota To Give Taxpayer-Funded Trans Dolls With Removable Genitals To 4-Year-Old Students

Indoctrinating young people with transgender ideology clearly remains a top priority for many on the left. One glaring recent example comes from Minnesota, where a new initiative seeks to impose that worldview on children in one of the most direct ways imaginable. And as New York Post reported, the state’s taxpayers will be footing the bill: “First-of-their-kind” transgender dolls — complete with removable genitalia — will debut in some Minnesota classrooms this fall to kids as young as 4 years old. The paper dolls, with gender-neutral names like “Sam,” “Rory,” “Avery” and “Parker,” have removable internal and external genitals, along with more than 100 interchangeable pieces of clothing, accessories and hairstyles — like a trans Mr./Mrs. Potato Head. The goal is for kids to “learn about the different options that exist for who they can be,” according to a therapist at the University of Minnesota Medical School, which spent over half a decade developing the controversial project funded by lefty Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz The Medical School’s Institute for Sexual and Gender Health research over those six years included paying $20 to $60 for “trans and gender diverse” children and their parents to play with the dolls and “talk about gender and bodies” in groups. The program drew some backlash on social media: Unbelievable satanic bull shit. I wonder how those Muslims up there are going to like this? I'm guessing not so much. This should be illegal!!!! — jackass1 (@jackass1_ricky) July 25, 2026 The progressive left wants to destabilize the population by destroying traditional values. Entering this level of confusion to a child is an effort to create victims. — Necro Barney (@ledonne_ch78387) July 25, 2026 Taxpayer-funded transgender dolls headed to Minnesota classrooms this fall. “First-of-their-kind” paper dolls with removable genitalia will be introduced to some Minnesota classrooms for children as young as 4 years old, according to a New York Post report. The dolls, developed… pic.twitter.com/avV9DA9KxJ — Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) July 25, 2026 Here’s the full text of the post above: Taxpayer-funded transgender dolls headed to Minnesota classrooms this fall. “First-of-their-kind” paper dolls with removable genitalia will be introduced to some Minnesota classrooms for children as young as 4 years old, according to a New York Post report. The dolls, developed over six years by professors at the University of Minnesota Medical School’s Institute for Sexual and Gender Health, come with gender-neutral names like Sam, Rory, Avery and Parker. They feature more than 100 interchangeable pieces of clothing, hairstyles, accessories — and detachable internal and external genitals. The stated goal is for kids to “learn about the different options that exist for who they can be.” One of the co-founders, Associate Professor Dianne Berg, previously said: “Everyone should be learning that there’s diversity in gender identity and that what makes you real is not what your body parts are, but how you think and feel.” She added that she has already begun using the dolls with her own patients who are between five and ten years old. (Video: AI) The university’s Medical School receives $15 million in annual state funding. Critics, including Dr. Quentin Van Meter, past president of the American College of Pediatricians, have raised serious concerns about the age-appropriateness of introducing such materials to young children. A university spokesperson said no public funds supported the commercialization of the dolls, but declined to detail how much taxpayer money went into the research and development. In my view, directing public resources toward materials of this nature for preschool and elementary-age children raises serious questions about both fiscal priorities and developmental suitability. At the very least, parents must have a clear and unambiguous right to opt their children out. Many critics go further and argue the entire program should be shut down. Meanwhile in Minnesota, Linda Hunsberger has a warning for parents based on her experience, as this recent Alpha News report explains: Hunsberger told Collin that during the past 10 years, she’s been helping other parents deal with what she considers predatory transgender ideology in some schools. In 2024, for example, a school counselor in the Rochester school district blew the whistle and called out the administrative guidelines for trans students, which state that parents will be provided with information about whether their child is transgender only if they request it. Hunsberger explained to Collin how she spoke up back then and wrote a letter to the school district. In speaking up, unfortunately from her own experience, Hunsberger urged the district to change its policy: “Many parents do not see their child’s ‘Trans’ identity coming. Schools that withhold this information are robbing parents of necessary time. “These parents need the time we did not have. Upon coming out in 2014, our child asked us to help with a medical transition. We asked for time. Time to understand what this meant and how to best help. It wasn’t enough time. Six months later our child suddenly disappeared not to be seen by us since.”   Here’s some additional coverage: Horrifying: Transgender dolls are coming to Minnesota classrooms targeting kids as young as 4 years old. “You are a very bad human if you are trying to introduce this kind of confusion to children… children are the guinea pigs for this weird ideology.” — @RCamposDuffy pic.twitter.com/Qb05mAFZl1 — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) July 25, 2026 What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Minnesota To Give Taxpayer-Funded Trans Dolls With Removable Genitals To 4-Year-Old Students appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

President Trump Addresses “Explosive Diarrhea” Outbreak: “We’re Going to Put a Major Tariff on Mexico!”
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

President Trump Addresses “Explosive Diarrhea” Outbreak: “We’re Going to Put a Major Tariff on Mexico!”

While taking questions in the Oval Office today, President Trump was asked about one of the most pressing matters in our nation — the lettuce causing “explosive diarrhea” in many states. Fox News reporter Peter Doocy asked him when it will be “safe to eat lettuce” again, to which President Trump gave an absolutely hilarious response. “Are you eating lettuce recently?” he asked Peter before telling him to, “get out of here,” if he was! Then, President Trump went on to joke that he is going to have to put a major tariff on Mexico for sending in the lettuce, along with a tariff on Canada for the wildfire smoke blowing into parts of the United States. Watch President Trump’s full answer here: JUST IN: President Trump announces Mexico will be PUNISHED for sending in lettuce to our country that's giving people "explosive diarrhea" "We're going to put a MAJOR TARIFF on Mexico because of the lettuce, and we're going to put a BIG tariff on Canada because of the smoke,… pic.twitter.com/lErHYSL1ch — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) July 24, 2026 President Trump might be kidding, but it may not be a bad idea! His idea is generating quite the buzz online. Some of these comments are just hilarious: Imagine waking up from a 10 year coma and seeing this headline right outta the gate. https://t.co/OqrYjBoU31 — Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) July 24, 2026 @pdoocy That has to be the first time the words ‘explosive diarrhea’ were uttered in the Oval Office since Biden’s term. — ElvisUSA (@ElvisUSA) July 24, 2026 In Michigan, you get both so you don’t dare cough. — Tomatofan (@Tomatofan) July 24, 2026 The recent outbreak of cyclospora, a parasite that causes gastrointestinal issues, has been linked to lettuce sold by Taylor Farms originating from Central Mexico. This contaminated lettuce was distributed to many stores and restaurants in the United States, including Taco Bell. So far, nearly 2,000 people across nine states have fallen ill from it. Along with the diarrhea lettuce coming in from Mexico, smoke from wildfires in Toronto has been blowing in across the Northeast and Midwest. Here’s some footage of a massive smoke plume in New York: New York was covered in smoke from wildfires in Canada A thick layer of smog blanketed the city’s sky, while the smell of burning spread through the streets. A massive smoke plume from large-scale wildfires in neighboring Canada covered a huge area and worsened air quality. New… pic.twitter.com/3cEwU0icJC — NEXTA (@nexta_tv) July 17, 2026 USA Today shared more details on both situations: A CDC outbreak update released Friday, July 24, reported 4,173 laboratory-confirmed cases of the disease since May 1. The CDC said that an additional 7,400 cases, many in Michigan and Ohio, have not yet been confirmed. The number of states reporting cases grew to 41 in this latest CDC update, but those cases may not all be part of ongoing outbreaks. USA TODAY research suggests cases of cyclosporiasis, the infection caused by the microscopic parasite Cyclospora and known to cause severe diarrhea, have been reported in all but four states. Apart from the ongoing cyclosporiasis outbreak, wildfire smoke from Canadian wildfires has left skies in some parts of the United States blackened and under an orange blaze. Smoke from out-of-control wildfires created horrible air pollution in Toronto, which on July 15, had the worst pollution in the world. In the United States, New York City ranked fifth worst, according to IQAir, a Swiss air quality technology company. What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post President Trump Addresses “Explosive Diarrhea” Outbreak: “We’re Going to Put a Major Tariff on Mexico!” appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Democrat Rep. Launches Legal Plot Against Barron Trump
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Democrat Rep. Launches Legal Plot Against Barron Trump

A House Democrat has set her sights on Barron Trump. Rep. Yassamin Ansari of Arizona is demanding that Republican House Oversight Chairman James Comer open an investigation into alleged political interference surrounding Andrew and Tristan Tate. She also wants President Trump’s youngest son hauled in to answer questions under oath. The demand is real. No subpoena has been issued, no lawsuit has been filed, and Ansari’s letter does not accuse Barron of committing a crime. Andrew and Tristan Tate have been indicted on horrific charges of rape, human trafficking, and the exploitation of minors. Chair @RepJamesComer must swiftly open an investigation into the Tate brothers’ coordination and extensive relationships with members of the President’s… pic.twitter.com/FflTbMvgi1 — Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari (@RepYassAnsari) July 23, 2026 Ansari’s July 23 letter asks Comer to issue subpoenas for Justice Department and State Department records concerning the Tate brothers’ extradition and legal matters. She also seeks White House and federal-agency visitor logs, communications with the Tates or their representatives, and records involving members of President Trump’s family. Then comes the extraordinary part: Ansari asks the committee to compel testimony from Barron Trump. Her proposed questioning would cover his knowledge of the brothers’ alleged crimes, whether he had “any involvement whatsoever,” and whether he communicated with his father or administration officials about their legal proceedings. Barron holds no government office and has no formal role in the administration. Ansari’s letter presents no evidence that he influenced an extradition decision, directed a federal official or committed any offense. It leans on press accounts and public claims about contacts between Andrew Tate and people around the Trump family, then asks Congress to determine whether those relationships affected government policy. That is a serious allegation wrapped around a very thin public case against Barron himself. Under the House Oversight Committee rules, subpoena power rests with the chairman and the committee. The chairman may authorize and issue subpoenas for investigations within the panel’s jurisdiction, while formal committee action can also authorize compulsory process. Ansari is a Democratic minority member. She can demand an investigation, release a letter and turn up the political pressure, but she cannot sign a binding subpoena to Barron on her own authority. Comer controls the next move. His published rules also place deposition decisions with the chairman after consultation with the ranking minority member, and any enforceable demand would have to follow the committee’s formal process. No public announcement from Comer had confirmed a Barron subpoena as of publication. Ansari has launched a congressional pressure campaign; the legal force behind it remains in Republican hands. The scope of her request was laid out on Capitol Hill: Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansari presses Oversight chair Comer to probe "potential political interference and improper conduct by the federal government" on the Tate brothers. She wants subpoenas for DOJ and State on extradition, WH and agency logs and testimony from Barron Trump https://t.co/0V5gCfeuhQ pic.twitter.com/fSgeDhKw6I — Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) July 23, 2026 The timing comes from the Tate brothers’ rapidly escalating legal trouble. The Crown Prosecution Service announced on July 19 that British prosecutors had authorized further charges involving four additional alleged victims. Andrew Tate faces new rape, trafficking, assault and indecent-image counts, while Tristan Tate faces new rape, sexual-assault and trafficking counts. U.S. Marshals arrested the brothers in the United States on July 18. British prosecutors said they would seek extradition on 21 earlier charges as well as the newly authorized charges. The CPS says the combined cases now involve seven alleged victims and alleged conduct dating from 2010 through 2017. The brothers have denied wrongdoing in the cases against them. Those accusations are grave, and the criminal proceedings are active. The CPS also stressed that charging decisions are not findings of guilt, that the defendants retain the right to a fair trial, and that only a court can determine the facts. Ansari is trying to connect that criminal storm to an American political-influence theory. Her letter cites alleged direct communications between Andrew Tate and Barron, along with contacts between the brothers and other figures in President Trump’s orbit. Public claims about a Barron-Tate relationship have been disputed, and the letter supplies no messages, call records or witness account showing that Barron asked the federal government to help either brother. There is an enormous difference between knowing a controversial internet personality and secretly steering United States policy for him. The administration’s public position also runs against the idea of a rescue operation. During a July 23 White House briefing, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked whether President Trump planned to intervene in the Tate extradition process. Her answer was a flat “No.” The extradition must move through federal court before the State Department reaches a final surrender decision. The brothers are in custody while that process proceeds. The administration’s refusal to intervene publicly weakens the claim that it is presently trying to shield the Tates. It does not settle whether private lobbying or earlier contacts occurred, which is why records could provide a clearer answer. Ansari is asking Comer to chase that broader theory. Her letter currently offers no documented act by Barron that caused a federal decision, no identified order he gave and no criminal allegation against him. Ansari erased any doubt about the person she wants in the crosshairs with a blunt follow-up Friday: I said what I said. Investigate Barron. https://t.co/VmWg9THQuy — Congresswoman Yassamin Ansari (@RepYassAnsari) July 24, 2026 That wording gives away the political posture. She did not say “investigate the extradition process.” She said, “Investigate Barron.” If Ansari has evidence that Barron pressured federal officials, she should produce it. If Comer uncovers evidence of improper interference, the committee should follow it wherever it leads. Congressional subpoena power is a serious instrument. Pointing it at the president’s 20-year-old son on the strength of disputed relationship claims should require more than a viral slogan. For now, Barron has not been served with a subpoena, charged with a crime or accused in court of helping the Tates. A Democratic congresswoman has still made clear that she wants him dragged into the investigation. Whether Comer gives her that weapon is the next—and far more consequential—question. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Democrat Rep. Launches Legal Plot Against Barron Trump appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Joe Biden Gives Up, Declines to Seek Further Review of Appeals Court Ruling on Release of Audiotapes with Ghostwriter
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Joe Biden Gives Up, Declines to Seek Further Review of Appeals Court Ruling on Release of Audiotapes with Ghostwriter

Joe Biden had until August 3 to keep fighting. He walked away ten days early. On Friday, Biden’s attorneys filed a one-page notice of voluntary dismissal in his separate lawsuit against the Justice Department. The filing dismisses the case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. The lawsuit sought to stop DOJ from handing over redacted recordings and transcripts of Biden’s 2016 and 2017 conversations with memoir writer Mark Zwonitzer. Those interviews later became evidence in Special Counsel Robert Hur’s classified-documents investigation. The phrase “without prejudice” leaves a technical opening for another lawsuit, but it cannot put released recordings back under seal. If DOJ distributes the files first, any follow-up case would collide with the very problem Biden’s lawyers stressed throughout the litigation: disclosure cannot be undone. Biden’s retreat removes the immediate obstacle his lawyers had built around delivery of the material to the House Judiciary Committee. The Associated Press reported that he could have asked the full D.C. Circuit to rehear the matter or petitioned the Supreme Court; he chose neither route while DOJ still controls the release timing and final redactions. The Oversight Project, which is connected to the Heritage Foundation plaintiffs seeking the records, celebrated Friday: COMPLETE AND TOTAL VICTORY over President "Autopen" Biden "Autopen" Biden declined to seek further review of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling, paving the way for the release of the interview tapes with his ghostwriter. pic.twitter.com/p6Vl3Oi1TT — Oversight Project (@ItsYourGov) July 24, 2026 The surrender follows a bruising appellate defeat. In its July 20 order, a divided D.C. Circuit panel denied Biden’s emergency request for an injunction pending appeal. Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan and Judge Gregory Katsas formed the majority, while Judge Florence Pan dissented. The majority ruled that Biden failed to show he was likely to succeed in keeping the records hidden under federal privacy exemptions. It found a substantial public interest in examining evidence that Special Counsel Hur used both to assess Biden’s handling of classified information and to decide against criminal charges. DOJ’s redactions mattered. According to the court, the proposed release removes references to illness, death and non-public family members, leaving material that largely concerns foreign policy and Biden’s decision to stay out of the 2016 presidential race. The judges also rejected Biden’s separate privacy claim concerning the sound of his voice. The majority noted that Hur drew conclusions from tone and delivery that a written transcript alone could not fully convey. The court kept its administrative injunction in place until August 3 so Biden could seek further review. Friday’s filing ended the wait by his own choice. There is an important distinction here. These are the Zwonitzer memoir recordings from 2016 and 2017. They are separate from Biden’s October 2023 interview with Hur, audio of which surfaced publicly in 2025. Zwonitzer helped Biden write two memoirs, including the 2017 book Promise Me, Dad. Hur’s investigators obtained the writer’s recordings under an agreement limiting their use to the special counsel investigation, turning private source material into federal law-enforcement records subject to a later Freedom of Information Act fight. DOJ originally resisted release under FOIA privacy exemptions. After President Trump returned to office and the department completed additional redactions, DOJ reversed course and said the public interest now outweighed Biden’s reduced privacy interest. A Justice Department summary of the district-court decision says the department acknowledged that reversal, notified Biden’s lawyers and engaged in extensive consultation before reaching its final disclosure decision. U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich reviewed the proposed redactions privately. She found that the remaining material omitted the most sensitive family subjects and that DOJ had reasonably explained why public scrutiny of Hur’s investigation outweighed the remaining privacy concerns. That decision carried a narrow but powerful point: Hur publicly relied on the recordings, including their tone, while explaining a politically explosive declination. The public interest lies in hearing the evidence used to reach that decision instead of accepting an investigator’s description as the last word. Biden argued that the Trump Justice Department had weaponized disclosure for political retribution. Friedrich concluded that alleged political motives did not erase the department’s stated reasoning or make its revised FOIA judgment arbitrary. Judge Pan saw the balance differently. Her dissent emphasized that the conversations took place inside Biden’s home, were gathered during an investigation that produced no indictment and remained private even after the most personal passages were removed. Pan warned that disclosure would moot Biden’s appeal before the courts could resolve every legal issue. She would have preserved the status quo and allowed the case to proceed. Biden has now made that warning academic by abandoning further review himself. The recordings matter because Special Counsel Robert Hur concluded that criminal charges were unwarranted while also describing evidence that Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified material after leaving the vice presidency. One recorded exchange became especially notorious. Biden told Zwonitzer that he had “just found all the classified stuff downstairs,” a remark Hur cited while reconstructing how sensitive records were handled. Hur ultimately concluded that prosecutors would face serious obstacles proving willfulness beyond a reasonable doubt. His report also predicted that Biden could appear to a jury as a sympathetic elderly man with memory problems, language that ignited a national debate over Biden’s fitness for office. The appellate majority said the public has a weighty interest in evaluating whether investigators possessed incriminating evidence and still “pulled their punches.” The redacted recordings offer Americans a chance to judge that question with their own ears. Biden’s privacy argument was substantial enough to win a dissent from a federal appellate judge. It was not strong enough to win the injunction he needed. Then came Friday’s dismissal. The August 3 clock did not beat Biden. He stopped the fight himself. DOJ should now release the lawfully redacted record promptly and tell the public exactly what remains withheld. After years of lawyers, privilege claims and competing political narratives, the evidence is finally closer to speaking for itself. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Joe Biden Gives Up, Declines to Seek Further Review of Appeals Court Ruling on Release of Audiotapes with Ghostwriter appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.