The Supreme Court just delivered a massive victory for the Trump administration on immigration! In a 6-3 decision, SCOTUS ruled that the DHS is allowed to strip green card holders and lawful permanent residents of their legal status if they leave the country while facing criminal charges — even if they have not been convicted yet. This will prevent criminal immigrants from re-entering the United States and putting Americans in danger if they travel abroad. Take a look at the decision: JUST IN: The US Supreme Court has just UPHELD the Trump admin's ability to BLOCK criminal foreigners from reentering America, 6-3 BIG WIN! DHS CONFIRMS: "The Supreme Court affirmed an important tool DHS has long used to prevent criminals from entering our country." No… pic.twitter.com/C5D4KE9i64 — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) June 23, 2026 BREAKING: In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the Department of Homeland Security may revoke a lawful permanent resident’s status if they leave the United States while facing pending criminal charges, even without a conviction. The court’s liberal justices… pic.twitter.com/FoxTS0OokC — Breaking911 (@Breaking911) June 23, 2026 The case centered around a lawful permanent resident from China who was placed on immigration parole after he traveled to his home country while still facing counterfeiting charges in the U.S. As you might have expected, all three liberal justices dissented. NBC News reported further on the ruling: The 6-3 decision centers around an immigration officers’ 2012 decision to put lawful permanent resident Muk Choi Lau on immigration parole when he returned from a short trip to China because he had been accused of a counterfeiting crime. Lau argued that overstepped the officer’s authority, and the decision wrongly allowed the Department of Homeland Security to swiftly begin deportation proceedings after he pleaded guilty to selling counterfeit clothes in New Jersey. The high court disagreed. “Border officers did not have the burden to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Lau had committed a crime involving moral turpitude,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in the opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson disagreed, writing that the decision to put Lau on immigration parole effectively sentenced him to “immigration limbo” before he’d been convicted of any crime, she wrote. “I worry that the Court has now handed the Government a massive blank check,” she wrote in a dissent joined by her two liberal colleagues. The decision comes as the high court considers a series of immigration-related issues against the backdrop of President Donald Trump’s sweeping immigration crackdown, though this case started before Trump took office. Fox Live Now provided further coverage in this clip: MASSIVE WIN: The U.S. Supreme Court just sided with the Trump administration in a 6-3 decision (Blanche v. Lau) ALLOWING the Department of Homeland Security to treat green card holders / lawful permanent residents as “seeking admission” and STRIP or SUSPEND their legal status… pic.twitter.com/9UI4CxXlqF — RedWave Press (@RedWavePress) June 23, 2026 What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Supreme Court Hands Trump Administration BIG WIN in 6-3 Decision appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

It’s official: Tulsi Gabbard is out, and Bill Pulte has taken over the ODNI as Acting Director of National Intelligence. Under orders from President Trump, he’s wasting no time ordering a massive purge of the Deep State! According to sources who spoke to CNN, “the deep state firings have begun” as Pulte starts drastically slashing jobs. CNN’s Kristen Holmes shared: Firings at the Office of the Director of National intelligence started today, a source familiar with the matter told CNN."The deep state firings have begun,” the source said, declining to give  details on how many jobs had been cut. — Kristen Holmes (@KristenhCNN) June 22, 2026 While we don’t know exactly how many jobs will be cut, it’s likely to be in the hundreds. Here’s more from the CNN report on the mass firings that are currently underway: Sources had previously told CNN that Bill Pulte, Trump’s pick to serve as director of national intelligence in an acting capacity, was looking at cutting hundreds of jobs at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI). Last week, Pulte showed up to his new job a day early after asking for a list of every employee in the office, sources told CNN, catching even outgoing director Tulsi Gabbard off-guard. A source familiar with the matter told CNN that the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) and the National Counterintelligence and Security Center were expected to be hit hard by the cuts. All offices were asked to provide a list ranking their personnel by Monday, according to two sources familiar with the matter, who associated the request with Pulte’s mandate to carry out mass firings. The firings came as top Democrats on the Senate and House Intelligence Committees sent a letter on Monday to Pulte warning him of the risks of making large cuts to the workforce. Previously, President Trump announced that he had directed Pulte to execute widespread “downsizing” at the office. Per NBC News: Trump named Pulte the acting director this month and said on Truth Social that he had “asked him to execute the immediate and needed downsizing of the office, reverting staff to their home agencies.” Pulte, who has no background in national security matters, has been serving as head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. A separate source with knowledge of the matter told NBC News over the weekend that Pulte had ordered staff members to identify 400 employees to be fired from the National Counterterrorism Center, which is part of the U.S. intelligence community, in the coming weeks. Pulte issued the instruction late Thursday — before he officially took over for outgoing Director Tulsi Gabbard, the source said. He started his new post Friday. Notably, President Trump appointed Pulte as Acting DNI, so he does not have to be confirmed by the Senate. This move has angered a lot of Democrats — for good reason, since it means they can’t do anything to stop him from taking out the trash at the agency! Here’s what President Trump had to say about his appointment of Bill Pulte: President Trump has also nominated Jay Clayton to serve in the permanent role of DNI. However, he says that the Senate confirmation process will not begin until Clayton’s current role as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York is fulfilled. ABC News reported: Trump had previously announced he was nominating U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Jay Clayton to permanently lead ODNI amid backlash from Democrats and Republicans to his appointment of Bill Pulte to be acting director. Trump then abruptly announced last week that the confirmation process for Clayton would not continue until his pick to replace Clayton as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Jamie McDonald, is confirmed. While he’s there, Pulte has a big job to do! Keep cleaning out the Swamp! This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post BREAKING: “Deep State Firings Have Begun” As Bill Pulte Steps Into DNI Role appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

In a huge win for housing affordability, the Senate just took major action to stop major Wall Street firms from purchasing homes meant for American families. On Monday, the Senate overwhelmingly passed a landmark bill that would prevent large institutional investors from buying single-family residential homes. The final vote was 85-5. Check it out: President Trump previously called for Congress to pass legislation preventing Wall Street from snapping up homes meant for families back in January. For months now, versions of the bill have been going back and forth between the House and Senate. Only five Senators — all Republicans — voted against the revised bill in Monday’s vote. Here are their names, per The New York Post: Sens. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah) voted against the measure. After the bill was approved, the Senate GOP issued this statement: Rising home prices are crushing the American dream.  Senate Republicans passed a bill to lower those costs. The 21st Century Road to Housing Act cuts red tape, gets the government out of the way, and drives down costs for homebuyers. — Senate Republicans (@SenateGOP) June 22, 2026 Now, the bill will head to the House — where, hopefully, it will finally be approved and sent to President Trump’s desk. CBS News reported further: The bill, known as the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, aims to increase housing supply and bring down costs, including by limiting institutional investors from purchasing certain single-family homes. The Senate approved an earlier version of the package in March, before the House in May approved another version. Then last week, the Senate Banking and House Financial Services committees announced a bicameral agreement on the long-sought legislation. The bill represents the most sweeping housing legislation in decades. Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina, the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, said in a statement that it was the result of “years of work to lower costs, expand housing supply, cut red tape, protect taxpayers, and help more Americans achieve the dream of homeownership.” “Now it is time to move forward, get this bill across the finish line, and deliver real relief for the American people,” Scott said. Speaking from the Senate floor last week, Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, the top Democrat on the Banking Committee, outlined some of the bill’s more than 45 housing provisions. The legislation would remove some regulatory barriers and streamline environmental reviews to increase development of affordable housing; update chassis requirements for manufactured housing; create an innovation fund for communities increasing housing supply; and support housing opportunities for veterans, among other things. “There is so much in this bill,” Warren said. “Each piece, directing us toward increasing the supply of housing, bringing down the cost, and making housing something that is not just a Wall Street investment, but is actually there for American families.” The White House has pushed for the provision limiting purchases of single-family homes by institutional investors, which proponents say would benefit homebuyers by cutting competition. The legislation now heads to the House, which is returning from recess this week and is expected to move quickly. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post JUST IN: Senate Overwhelmingly PASSES Landmark Housing Affordability Bill appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

If taxpayers are footing the bill for the costs of food and healthcare for millions of Americans, the Trump administration believes that those receiving the benefits should at least be obliged to use their EBT cards to purchase healthier foods. That’s why the White House has pushed for restrictions on SNAP benefits, specifically to exclude purchases of sugary sodas. But leave it to a federal judge appointed by Barack Obama to gum up the works, as The Hill reported: “Congress defined what ‘food’ is supposed to be, and it did not authorize the agency to amend or waive the definition it enacted. It did not authorize the agency to cut types of food out of SNAP entirely,” U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson wrote in a Monday filing, referencing the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). “It set out clearly the type of experimental projects that could be tested to address the unquestionably serious health issues attributed to the rise of obesity in the population in general and particularly the low-income population,” she added. According to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia filing, five states, including Iowa, Nebraska, West Virginia, Colorado and Tennessee, “submitted requests to the USDA to conduct pilot projects” between April and August 2025 attempting to “waive the federal definition of ‘food,’” removing certain items from that definition including soft drinks and soda. Represented by the National Center for Law and Economic Justice (NCLEJ), a nonprofit focused on advancing justice for low-income families, five SNAP recipients from those five states had sued the USDA for implementing its waiver restriction pilot projects. The decision sparked significant pushback on social media: If these POS judges have nothing better to do then make sure unhealthy people still get what is making them unhealthy then this judge has no value. Remove her — Johnny Appleseed (@badapple2026) June 23, 2026 I don't understand why the Trump admin keeps listening to these corrupt judges. They seem to have more power than the president himself. What a joke… — Josef Bormann (@JosefBormann) June 23, 2026 Weird… it’s almost like they want poor people to stay poor, fat and die. — bash (@mellamobash) June 23, 2026 KCRG also reported on the judge’s recent decision: The Iowan named in the lawsuit, Marc Craig, said the state’s complicated restrictions prevent him from buying foods to help manage his kidney disease and diabetes. He said that he used to maintain his sodium and sugar levels with Pedialyte or Gatorade, but is no longer able to purchase those with his SNAP benefits. The National Center for Law and Economic Justice said in a statement that “this decision makes clear that the USDA cannot bypass the legal guardrails that establish how SNAP must operate across the country. It affirms that families deserve a program that works without confusion.” The USDA shared a statement to Reuters, saying “the idea that taxpayer funds should not be used to purchase junk food should not be controversial. USDA will not be backing down from the fight to Make America Healthy Again, including for families and communities reliant on SNAP.” Oh, and if Jackson’s name rings a bell, that’s because she’s been a thorn in the side of the Trump administration since early in the president’s first term: This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Obama-Appointed Judge Blocks White House Bid To Restrict Food Stamp Junk Food Purchases appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Just months before the midterms are expected to take place Tucker Carlson has announced he is departing ways with the Republican Party. In a recent interview on the Canadian podcast “Can’t Be Censored,” Tucker Carlson announced he will no longer be supporting the Republican Party. Tucker then noted he will not be supporting the Democrat Party either. AP reported more on Carlson’s shocking remarks: Longtime conservative commentator Tucker Carlson said on a podcast that “there’s no chance I would support the Republican Party” ahead of the November midterm elections, dismissing the political affiliation he’s defended as a pundit for decades, including as one of Fox News Channel’s most popular hosts. “Not gonna support the Democratic Party,” Carlson was quick to add, speaking late last week on the show “Can’t Be Censored.” “I don’t know what I’m going to do.” Carlson, who has amassed a large following on his own podcast since being fired from Fox News in 2023, has more recently diverged from the party, a disillusionment supercharged by President Donald Trump’s decision to go to war with Iran in February. Carlson supported Trump in 2024. After the war began, he apologized for supporting the then-presidential candidate and “misleading people,” saying it wasn’t intentional. He’s repeatedly criticized the war as being at the behest of Israel at the expense of Americans, and attacked the party for failing to represent its own voters, citizens and nation. “They are making decisions on the basis of other criteria, what’s best for this company, what’s best for Israel, what’s best for our donors,” he said. “That’s not just, like, they are off in the wrong direction, like, that is unacceptable, that’s treasonous, it’s immoral, it can’t continue.” “I’ve been a consistent defender for 35 years of the Republican Party, I mean very consistent defender, but there’s no defending this,” he said. “So no, I’m out. And if I’m out, then I think a lot of other people are out.” Watch Tucker here: Tucker Carlson: I would not support the Republican party, there's no chance I would support the Republican party. How could I support a political party that is not loyal to the United States. I voted Republican my entire life, I have been a consistent defender for 35 years of the… pic.twitter.com/dYX0DK9XAx — Headquarters (@HQNewsNow) June 22, 2026 Later in the same interview, Carlson defended Democrat Senate candidate Graham Platner of Maine. The Daily Wire covered Carlson’s remarks on Platner: Tucker Carlson on Thursday downplayed and defended Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner’s Nazi tattoo. On the Canadian “Can’t Be Censored“ podcast, the former Fox News host sat down with Travis Dhanraj and Karman Wong to discuss President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, Israel, Iran, and why he says he can no longer support the Republican Party. Carlson raised eyebrows with his defense of Platner’s candidacy to challenge incumbent Republican Senator Susan Collins in Maine, where Carlson also lives. Republicans across the country have targeted Platner over a series of personal scandals, including a Nazi tattoo that women around him have said he understood the meaning of. “Look at Graham Platner, this guy who’s running in the state of Maine, where I live … he’s a Democrat, he’s liberal, I don’t have strong feelings about it,” Carlson said. “But rather than respond to what the guy’s positions are, they just have called him a Nazi for the last month, because he had a tattoo that was not a swastika, but apparently it was connected to the German military at some point, it’s not even clear he knew that.” Then, the podcaster speculated why Republicans don’t support the Bernie Sanders-backed leftist. “They’ve attacked the guy, and his personal life. They don’t like him because he’s not sufficiently supportive of Israel,” Carlson added. Here’s the moment Carlson defended Platner: The horseshoe theory is not a theory anymore. pic.twitter.com/n7FdkT3Ffy — Justin (@JustinUSA) June 19, 2026 This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Tucker Carlson Announces He’s LEAVING The Republican Party appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.