Something is deeply sick when murdering the President of the United States is advertised like a cash prize. An Iran-aligned militia umbrella in Iraq has announced a purported $10 million reward for killing President Trump. It is not the only one. Days earlier, loyalists at the funeral of Iran’s late Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei marched behind placards offering $100 million for the same crime. The advertised dollar amounts have not been independently verified as funded cash pools. That caveat matters. It does not make the invitations to murder any less vile. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq announced Thursday night that it was offering a $10 million reward for the killing of US President Donald Trump, Iran’s state-run IRNA news agency and Russia’s state-run RT, formerly Russia Today, reported. The group said the reward followed what… — Iran International English (@IranIntl_En) July 16, 2026 That appears to be the newest bounty claim. Shafaq News reported that the Islamic Resistance in Iraq announced the $10 million offer on Thursday, July 16. The Islamic Resistance in Iraq is an umbrella used by Iran-aligned armed factions. It operates separately from Iraq’s elected government, making this a militia threat rather than an official act by Baghdad. But the wording was broader than a reward for one would-be assassin. The statement reportedly extended the offer to anyone who killed President Trump, directed others to do it, or helped an individual, group, organization, or institution carry it out. The group claimed the money had been collected from supporters. No public evidence has established that the full amount exists, has been placed in escrow, or could actually be paid. The militia framed the threat as revenge for the January 2020 U.S. strike that killed IRGC Quds Force commander Qassem Soleimani and Iraqi militia leader Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis near Baghdad International Airport. That alone would be outrageous. Then there is the separate $100 million display. Calls for Trump’s assassination featured prominently at Ali Khamenei’s funeral, where participants carried placards offering a $100 million reward for his killing. pic.twitter.com/fYmu6u4TT9 — Iran International English (@IranIntl_En) July 9, 2026 This was not a private message passed through some obscure back channel. Iran International documented calls for President Trump’s killing during Khamenei’s funeral events, including crosshairs placed over the faces of American and Israeli public figures and placards warning that their heads would roll. The $100 million figure appeared on banners carried by regime loyalists during the public procession. A separate propaganda display later appeared in Tehran’s Enghelab Square depicting President Trump inside a coffin beneath the words, “We Kill Trump.” Once again, a banner is not proof that Iran’s treasury formally appropriated $100 million or that an authorized payment mechanism exists. But it is proof that calls to assassinate the sitting American President were being displayed openly, repeatedly, and without shame amid a national event saturated with regime imagery. There is a reason Washington cannot shrug this off as theater. Iran-linked assassination planning has already moved well beyond posters. In November 2024, the Justice Department charged Farhad Shakeri, an alleged IRGC asset living in Iran, in a murder-for-hire case involving targets inside the United States. Federal investigators said Shakeri disclosed that an IRGC official tasked him on October 7, 2024, with providing a plan to assassinate then-President-elect Trump. The case was already much larger than one target. Prosecutors accused Shakeri of using criminal associates he met while imprisoned in the United States to build a surveillance and assassination network for the IRGC. Two alleged associates were arrested in New York after investigators said they spent months surveilling an Iranian-American critic of the regime. The government alleged that Shakeri promised $100,000 for that murder. Shakeri also told investigators that an IRGC official offered $500,000 for the killing of either of two Jewish Americans in New York and directed surveillance against Israeli tourists in Sri Lanka. He remained at large and was believed to be living in Tehran when the charges were announced. The other defendants were presumed innocent unless proven guilty, but the complaint showed why Iranian revenge threats cannot automatically be dismissed as empty bluster. Then, in March 2026, another Justice Department case ended with the conviction of Asif Merchant, whom prosecutors described as a trained IRGC operative. Merchant admitted at trial that the IRGC sent him to the United States to arrange political assassinations and steal documents. He had received tradecraft and countersurveillance training and repeatedly traveled to Iran to meet his handler. In 2024, Merchant contacted a New York acquaintance while trying to recruit people he believed had underworld connections. The acquaintance instead went to law enforcement and became a confidential source. Merchant then met men he believed were hitmen, discussed killing a political figure, and paid them a $5,000 advance. They were undercover U.S. law-enforcement officers. Agents arrested Merchant before he could leave the country. A federal jury convicted him of murder for hire and attempting to commit an act of terrorism across national boundaries, crimes that exposed him to a possible life sentence. The Justice Department said the intended targets included President Trump and other U.S. officials. That conviction turned the danger from a hypothetical talking point into a matter proven to a jury. That is the context in which these new bounty claims must be judged. President Trump answered Tehran’s surviving leadership with a blunt warning of his own: President Donald J. Trump sits down with @TreyYingst on negotiations with Iran. His message to what’s left of the Iranian regime’s leadership is: “You better make a deal. You’re not going to have anybody left.” pic.twitter.com/hxtEFMED7H — The White House (@WhiteHouse) July 14, 2026 The exact cash figures remain claims. The threats do not. An armed network aligned with Iran has publicly solicited the murder of the American President. Regime loyalists have paraded a second nine-figure offer through the streets. Federal prosecutors have already convicted or charged Iran-linked operatives in actual murder-for-hire plots targeting American officials. The public solicitations amount to incitement, intimidation, and an attempt to outsource assassination. Every person raising money, transmitting instructions, or facilitating these threats should be treated as part of a murder-for-hire network. Any government that gives such networks room to operate is choosing escalation. America cannot normalize a price being placed on its President’s life. It cannot be waved away after one news cycle or one funeral march. Not ever. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post JUST IN: Disgusting New Bounties Placed On President Trump’s Life appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

An extraordinary U.S. security alert is putting a major Jordanian port city on edge. The U.S. Embassy in Amman warned Americans to stay away from Aqaba’s international airport and seaport because of what it called a “specific and credible threat.” Hours later, Iran launched missiles toward the same city. The warning was unusually direct. It named two critical transportation hubs, advised Americans not to travel to either location, and told them to keep following local security instructions. Here is the alert issued by the Embassy: Security Alert: U.S. Embassy Amman – July 19, 2026. Due to a specific and credible threat, Jordanian authorities evacuated the international airport and seaport in Aqaba. We strongly advise all Americans to refrain traveling to either the airport or seaport. — U.S. Embassy Jordan (@USEmbassyJordan) July 19, 2026 That alert immediately raised the stakes. Fox News placed the Aqaba warning at the center of its live war coverage Sunday as U.S. forces completed an eighth consecutive night of strikes against Iran. The Embassy attributed the evacuation to Jordanian authorities and urged Americans to avoid both locations. Aqaba is Jordan’s only seaport and one of the country’s most important economic and logistical gateways. The alert came as more than 50,000 American troops across the Middle East remained on heightened watch. U.S. forces were striking Iranian coastal surveillance systems, air defenses, maritime assets, and missile and drone storage sites. Those strikes followed the Iranian attack on a U.S. base in Jordan that killed two American service members, left another missing, and sent four more to the hospital. President Trump ordered the retaliatory operation against the IRGC forces tied to that deadly attack. Then Jordan’s government challenged a crucial part of the Embassy’s account. Jordan has not ordered evacuation of Aqaba airport or seaport, gov’t spokesperson says — Reuters (@Reuters) July 19, 2026 Jordan says the facilities remained open. Euronews reported that Jordanian authorities denied the airport and seaport had been evacuated, even as the American security warning remained in force. That leaves two separate questions. The Embassy’s warning tells Americans to avoid the facilities because of a credible threat, while Jordan disputes the claim that its government cleared the two locations. Jordan’s denial does not erase the American alert. It does mean the reported evacuation should be treated as an Embassy-attributed claim rather than a settled fact confirmed by both governments. The facilities were reportedly still operating while air defenses across Jordan and neighboring Gulf states were responding to new Iranian launches. The conflicting public statements emerged in the middle of an active regional attack, when facts were changing by the minute. And then came a chilling development that made the Embassy’s warning look even more urgent. Iran fired missiles toward Aqaba. The IDF identified the launch of missiles from Iran toward the city of Aqaba in Jordan, adjacent to Israel. Several interceptors were launched toward missile debris in order to prevent debris impact within Israel. No damage or injuries were reported. — Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) July 19, 2026 The missile launch put the danger in plain view. The Associated Press reported that Iran fired missiles toward southern Jordan as the conflict spread across a widening list of American allies in the region. Jordan’s military said its defenses intercepted several Iranian missiles. Kuwait, Bahrain, and other Gulf states also activated air-defense systems as Tehran continued attacking outside Iran’s borders. Israel warned that missiles aimed toward Aqaba could cross into Israeli territory because the Jordanian city sits directly beside the border and across from Eilat. The IDF said interceptors were launched to prevent debris from striking Israel. No damage or injuries were reported in the IDF statement. The public record has not yet established whether the Embassy’s threat intelligence referred to that missile launch, another planned attack, or an entirely separate danger. Aqaba is no ordinary target. The city is Jordan’s only outlet to the sea, home to a commercial port, an international airport, and vital routes linking the country to the Red Sea. Any sustained disruption there could hit travel, trade, fuel, and regional military logistics at the same time. It also sits in one of the most sensitive corners of the Middle East. Jordan, Israel, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia all converge around the northern Red Sea, while American forces rely on Jordan as a key regional partner. The timing makes the alert especially ominous. Iran is already trying to widen the cost of President Trump’s campaign by striking U.S. personnel and infrastructure across neighboring countries. Washington, meanwhile, is hitting the systems Tehran uses to launch missiles, threaten shipping, and project power through the Strait of Hormuz. Now a U.S. diplomatic post is telling Americans to avoid an airport and seaport in the path of Iranian missiles. Jordan may dispute whether the two facilities were evacuated, but nobody can dismiss the danger that prompted the warning. This story is developing rapidly. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post BREAKING: U.S. Embassy Warns Americans Away From Jordan Airport And Seaport Over “Specific And Credible Threat” appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Just when it looked as if the war with Iran could not become any more dangerous, a new report is putting an almost unthinkable scenario on the table: An Iranian ground incursion into Kuwait aimed at seizing U.S. military bases. The report names Camp Buehring and either Camp Arifjan or Ali Al Salem Air Base as potential targets if Washington continues its military campaign against Tehran. Here is the breaking report now racing across X: BREAKING: Iran is seriously considering a ground incursion into Kuwait to seize U.S. military bases, including Camp Buehring and either Camp Arifjan or Ali Al Salem Air Base, if Washington continues its military campaign against Tehran, according to prominent Iranian journalist and analyst Mahdi Khanalizadeh and former Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki. — The Hormuz Report (@HormuzReport) July 19, 2026 That is an extraordinary claim, and it needs one important qualification right up front. No official Iranian invasion order has been publicly confirmed. There is no verified report of Iranian ground forces beginning such an operation. What has emerged is a series of increasingly open statements from influential Iranian voices discussing a ground attack on American installations in the region. Iranian figures are saying the quiet part out loud. The supplied report cites Iranian journalist and analyst Mahdi Khanalizadeh, who described Kuwait as one of Iran’s principal options for a possible ground incursion intended to seize two U.S. bases. That statement does not establish that Tehran has approved an operation. It does show that an invasion scenario is being discussed publicly while Iranian attacks on Kuwait are already underway. And Khanalizadeh is not the only Iranian figure floating the idea. Iran International reported Wednesday that former Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki, who now serves in Iran’s parliament, proposed a ground assault on a U.S. base somewhere in the region. Mottaki went much further. He called for Iranian forces to capture 100 Americans and transport them to Iran. Mottaki served as Iran’s foreign minister from 2005 through 2010 and now holds a seat in the legislature. His statement therefore came from a longtime regime insider with national-security experience, even though he was proposing a course of action rather than announcing a decision already taken. Talk of invading a neighboring country and taking American service members prisoner is a direct threat. It arrives while the shooting war is intensifying by the hour. Kuwait is already under Iranian attack. Kuwait’s government says Iran has repeatedly attacked targets inside the country, including military sites and vital civilian infrastructure. On Sunday, the English-language feed of the official Kuwait News Agency reported that an Iranian attack hit a power-generation and water-desalination plant for the second time in two days, setting part of the facility on fire. #Kuwait’s Ministry of Electricity, Water & Renewable Energy announces that, as a result of the Iranian aggression against the country, a power generation & water desalination plant came under a second attack in two days, causing a fire in parts of the facility. — Kuwait News Agency – English Feed (@kuna_en) July 19, 2026 The danger to civilians is enormous. The Associated Press reported that roughly 90 percent of Kuwait’s drinking water comes from desalination. A sustained campaign against those plants could threaten an essential lifeline for the entire country. AP also reported Sunday that Kuwait, Jordan and Bahrain activated air defenses against incoming Iranian drones and missiles as the regional conflict escalated again. The Gulf Cooperation Council’s secretary-general accused Iran of war crimes over attacks on civilian facilities and other infrastructure. Kuwait has repeatedly said it did not permit its territory to be used for offensive action against Iran. The latest Iranian attack came as U.S. forces struck surveillance sites, military logistics infrastructure, underground weapons storage and maritime capabilities inside Iran. The expanding target lists on both sides have now pulled civilian utilities, military installations and commercial shipping into the same rapidly widening battlefield. President Trump orders new strikes. The latest invasion talk follows a deadly Iranian attack on American personnel in Jordan. The Associated Press reported that two U.S. service members were killed, one remained missing, and four others required hospitalization after Iran struck a base in Jordan. President Trump responded by ordering another wave of American airstrikes against Iran. The deadly attack shattered the latest pause in fighting and drove Washington back into direct retaliation. American forces had already been conducting repeated strikes on Iranian targets, but the deaths in Jordan raised the stakes from pressure over Hormuz to punishment for Americans killed in action. Jordan said its air defenses were also intercepting Iranian missiles, while alarms and defensive systems were activated elsewhere across the Gulf. The conflict was no longer confined to the waters around Hormuz or to military sites inside Iran. Today at 6 p.m. ET, U.S. forces began launching new airstrikes against Iran at the Commander in Chief’s direction. The strikes are designed to further degrade Iran’s ability to threaten commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and swiftly punish Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps forces who launched attacks against American service members in Jordan last night. — U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) July 18, 2026 CENTCOM said the operation was designed both to punish the IRGC for its attack on Americans and to reduce Iran’s ability to threaten commercial shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. The United States has also been enforcing a naval blockade while striking Iranian military, logistics, weapons-storage and maritime targets. Could Iran actually invade Kuwait? Iran and Kuwait do not share a land border. A true ground incursion would therefore require Iranian forces to move across southern Iraq, conduct an amphibious operation across the Persian Gulf, or rely heavily on allied militias operating inside Iraq. Any of those routes would be extraordinarily difficult and would risk turning the current conflict into a much wider regional war. It would also place Iranian forces in direct combat with the United States and Kuwait on Kuwaiti soil. The consequences could be catastrophic. For now, the public evidence supports calling this a reported option and an open threat. It does not show that Iranian commanders have ordered troops into Kuwait. Iran has already crossed one red line after another by striking American personnel, Kuwaiti military facilities and infrastructure that helps provide civilians with electricity and drinking water. When regime-connected voices begin openly discussing seizing U.S. bases and hauling American prisoners back to Iran, Washington cannot afford to dismiss it as empty chatter. This story is developing rapidly. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE The post BREAKING: New Reports Say Iran Planning “Ground Invasion” appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

New York City had hours of warning. Then the water came anyway. Roads became rivers. Cars stalled in brown floodwater. Subway entrances took on water. Drivers had to be pulled from their vehicles as a violent Saturday storm hammered borough after borough. And the videos are staggering. Watch: Mamdani is busy pushing “free” babysitters and bussing while NYC looks like this with every heavy rainfall pic.twitter.com/JgokMuXOed — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) July 19, 2026 The montage above combines clips from multiple locations, and not every frame carries a visible location marker. It would be irresponsible to pretend that every scene has been independently geolocated. But the larger picture is not in dispute. Official road closures, emergency warnings, rescue footage and local reporting all confirm serious flooding across New York City on Saturday, July 18. This was not one clogged corner or one unlucky underpass. Floodwater disrupted roads in Manhattan, Brooklyn and Queens. It poured into parts of the subway system. It stranded drivers and snarled travel across the region. The city knew the danger was coming. New York City Emergency Management issued a weather alert Friday and said the city’s Flash Flood Emergency Plan had been activated ahead of the storm. Officials forecast 1 to 1.5 inches of rain across the city, with isolated pockets of 2 to 4 inches where storms repeatedly moved over the same neighborhoods. The warning was unusually specific: brief rainfall rates of 1.5 to 2 inches per hour could overwhelm drainage systems and rapidly flood roads, highways and underpasses. Mayor Zohran Mamdani said city workers were clearing catch basins, staffing emergency response teams and placing a downed-tree task force on standby. Emergency managers also said agencies were coordinating and positioning response assets before the most dangerous weather arrived. Infrastructure crews were also directed toward known trouble spots, including low-lying roads and areas where overwhelmed catch basins can turn heavy rain into a dangerous wall of water. Residents were urged to stay away from flooded streets, build extra time into any necessary travel and move vehicles out of flood-prone locations before the storm arrived. That preparation deserves to be stated plainly. So does what happened next. By Saturday afternoon, both directions of the Brooklyn-Queens Expressway were blocked at Queens Boulevard. Due to flooding, all lanes are blocked on both directions of the Brooklyn Queens Expressway at Queens Boulevard. pic.twitter.com/3Gq8mZUa55 — NYPD NEWS (@NYPDnews) July 18, 2026 The BQE was not the only major artery brought to a halt. The Independent reported that the Long Island Expressway was temporarily closed in both directions near 188th Street and that the Clearview Expressway was also shut near Northern Boulevard. The closures severed two heavily traveled Queens routes while water was rising on local streets around them. Lower Manhattan, western Brooklyn and Queens were among the hardest-hit areas. Some locations had received 2 to 4 inches by Saturday afternoon. In SoHo, water covered streets and climbed above the tires of parked vehicles. At Canal Street, rainwater reportedly rushed toward subway entrances and reached parts of the platform area. Subway service was delayed or rerouted across multiple lines. The storm also contributed to delays and cancellations at JFK, LaGuardia and Newark airports. The flooding did not hit every block with equal force. Where the strongest cells stalled, however, water accumulated quickly enough to make major roads impassable and turn routine travel into a rescue operation. By early evening, images from lower Manhattan showed drivers inching through water that covered much of the street. Other motorists abandoned vehicles rather than gamble on water whose depth they could not judge. Hundreds of airline delays and cancellations compounded the disruption, leaving the effects of one afternoon of weather stretching far beyond the neighborhoods where the rain fell hardest. New Yorkers trying to move through the city found themselves trapped between flooded roads below and a transit system struggling underground. For some drivers, getting home required a rescue. Multiple drivers had to be rescued from their vehicles after being blocked by flooding throughout NYC. See the latest on storm: https://t.co/FPPQSG6T5C pic.twitter.com/19KKytSwal — PIX11 News (@PIX11News) July 18, 2026 NBC New York reported that the most intense storms were capable of producing rainfall rates above 2 inches per hour as severe weather swept the tri-state area. Forecasters placed much of the region under a level 3 out of 5 severe-weather risk, and warnings spread as powerful cells crossed New Jersey, New York City, Long Island and coastal Connecticut. The local weather team tracked repeated flash-flood and severe-thunderstorm warnings through the afternoon and evening. The threat was not limited to standing water; intense cells also carried the potential for damaging winds and dangerous travel conditions. At rainfall rates above 2 inches per hour, water can collect faster than catch basins and storm drains can clear it. Underpasses and below-grade roadways can become traps before a driver realizes the route ahead is no longer passable. That is why emergency officials warned residents not to drive through water, even when the roadway beneath it appeared familiar. This was a genuinely severe weather event. But severity is not a free pass from scrutiny. The storm was not a government choice. How a city prepares, invests and responds absolutely is. City Hall can point to the warning, the activated emergency plan and the catch-basin crews. Those were the right steps. New Yorkers can point to expressways under water, motorists trapped in cars and subway access points swallowing rain. Both things can be true. The city prepared, and the preparation still was not enough. That should trigger more than another round of statements after the water recedes. New York residents pay some of the highest taxes in the country. They are entitled to ask whether the city’s priorities match its most basic obligations. New programs make headlines. Working drains, passable roads and a resilient transit system keep people safe. Mayor Mamdani inherited much of New York’s aging infrastructure. He now owns the responsibility to make it work. Saturday’s storm was a warning about more than the weather. It showed how quickly America’s largest city can seize up when the rain falls faster than the system can handle it. For anyone caught in a future storm, the city’s safety guidance is simple: never drive into floodwater. Water can be deeper and faster than it appears, and just one foot of moving water can carry away a vehicle. The water will drain. The accountability question should not. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE The post WATCH: Large Parts Of New York City Under Water appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

There have been countless headlines generated by the brazen theft that has flourished in deep-blue regions of the country as leftist politicians and prosecutors essentially cede control of city streets to criminals. But even if it has become a sign of the times to see products locked up, particularly in drug stores, to prevent theft, one recent anecdote out of California struck many social media users as particularly extreme. As the New York Post reported:  A San Jose Walmart has reportedly taken anti-theft measures to a new level, placing pricey cuts of beef and even packages of ground meat inside metal security cages to keep would-be shoplifters at bay. Influencer Tony Bartleson — better known online as “Meatdad” — posted a video from inside the California store showing rib-eye steaks and ground beef wrapped in wire security devices. Holding up a cowboy rib-eye priced at nearly $16 a pound, Bartleson quipped: “Welcome to California.” The video also showed a three-pound package of ground beef locked inside its own metal cage. The clip has racked up more than 3.8 million views. Here’s a sampling of the reaction: Why are people stealing meat @RepCarbajal ?? — The Fecal Poster (@TheFecalPoster) July 18, 2026   Retailers don’t spend money locking up products unless the cost of theft leaves them no choice. — twista (@boarhead1) July 18, 2026 Maybe people should just stop stealing taking what isnt theirs, thats an idea. — America First Always (@golfboatMAGA) July 19, 2026 Probably racist somehow. — Red Backpack ✝️ (@RedBackpack83) July 18, 2026 The Sun also reported on his viral post: “I think most of us want to live in a world where people can put food on the table with dignity, and I hope we continue moving in that direction,” Bartleson continued. Like many food items, the price of beef has increased over the past year. The USDA reported the average retail price of beef was a record high of $9.64 per pound in April 2026, up 13% from the previous year, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation. Continued demand and an unusually small US cattle herd are the causes of beef price increases. Comparatively, the price of pork increased just 2.3% between April 2025 and 2026, and the price of chicken decreased by 0.7%, according to the Farm Bureau Federation. Here’s some additional coverage of the frustrating trend impacting retailers across California and beyond: What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Walmart Is Even Locking Up The Ground Beef In California As Out-Of-Control Theft Continues appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.