The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said a man was arrested for allegedly throwing multiple Molotov cocktails at a U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office building in Los Angeles, California. The man shouted “anti-U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) sentiments,” DHS stated. “This was a clear and deliberate attack on federal law enforcement, and it is emblematic of the constant attacks these brave men and women endure day in and day out as they put their lives on the line to arrest murderers, rapists, and gang members,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “Our officers are facing mass assaults, vehicles used as weapons against them, and even targeted shootings. These attacks are the consequences of hateful and un-American rhetoric by sanctuary politicians, activists, and the media who smear our officers with misinformation and false narratives. Secretary Noem has been clear: anyone who assaults law enforcement will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law,” she continued. Additional coverage below: BREAKING: An anti-ICE man with a known criminal record has been ARRESTED for throwing Molotov cocktails at a federal building in Los Angeles "He as an EXTENSIVE record. He said he wanted to blow up the building and spray down the agents." The Democrat rhetoric CAUSES this.… pic.twitter.com/8enNGj60vT — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 3, 2025 More from DHS: On Monday, the 54-year-old suspect arrived at the Los Angeles Federal Building (LAFB) armed with multiple Molotov cocktails. A contract Protective Security Officer (PSO) heard the man yelling anti-ICE comments at the officers on the sidewalk off property. He proceeded to throw two Molotov cocktails at officers guarding the building. The suspect was taken into custody and stated that he wanted to blow up the building and “spray down” all the officers while making more derogatory comments about ICE officers. Fortunately, the bottles were not lit and did not catch fire and there were no injuries or damage to federal property. He also had four knives and a Leatherman tool on him at the time of his arrest. “Jose Francisco Jovel, 54, is charged with throwing two Molotov cocktails into our downtown Los Angeles Federal Building. This building houses our U.S. Attorney’s Office, ICE, and is where illegal immigrants are processed. Jovel was targeting our immigration enforcement operations and wanted to send a political message. Thankfully, the devices did not ignite and no one was injured. Jovel was immediately arrested. Federal officers seized Jovel’s belongings and discovered five other Molotov cocktails,” First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli said. “Jovel is charged with attempted malicious damage of federal property, and faces a mandatory minimum sentence of five years in federal prison and up to 20 years’ imprisonment. This is an ongoing investigation and we’ll be looking at adding additional charges. This case exemplifies how misleading and hateful rhetoric against federal law enforcement can and does result in violence. Irresponsible rhetoric by politicians and activists have real-world consequences. It must stop,” he continued. Jose Francisco Jovel, 54, is charged with throwing two Molotov cocktails into our downtown Los Angeles Federal Building. This building houses our U.S. Attorney's Office, ICE, and is where illegal immigrants are processed. Jovel was targeting our immigration enforcement operations… pic.twitter.com/p7j2hvqOge — F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli (@USAttyEssayli) December 2, 2025 ABC7 Los Angeles shared: DHS says the suspect has an extensive criminal history that spans almost four decades, including an attempted murder charge in 1987, an armed robbery charge in 1991 and a charge of annoying or molesting a victim under 18 in 2007. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass released the following statement: “I am deeply alarmed by the incident that occurred at the Federal Building in Downtown. This type of behavior is absolutely unconscionable. Thank you to our LAPD officers and law enforcement partners for their intervention and response. I am grateful that no one was injured.”

I bet you’ve all seen this famous photo circulating online: A dozen wars, millions dead, 1 nobel peace prize. 0 charges. pic.twitter.com/Eq6z8A7dXH — Rev Laskaris (@REVMAXXING) May 31, 2024 Some view it as a historic gathering of Presidents and their spouses. Otherwise like Rev above view it as a gathering of Elite Monsters who started a dozen wars, killed millions, and are basically some of the worst war criminals to exist. Like Chay, who captions the photo “Killers Club”: Killers Club pic.twitter.com/KycgL8yfhH — Chay Bowes (@BowesChay) June 1, 2024 Or Dom who asks “what is the name of this band?” What’s the name of this band? pic.twitter.com/TGYO1e6Dba — Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives (@dom_lucre) November 15, 2023 Ok, but did you know that’s not the REAL, original version of this photo? I’m about to blow your mind. The original version included Melania Trump! Yes, really. Take a look: Why does everyone cut Melania out the picture? pic.twitter.com/z1PaTewflQ — Refusenik Bex (@silver918111) November 16, 2023 [CENSORED] Here’s another look: Why cut Melania out? They’re all on the same team! https://t.co/xQnR9BhTTb pic.twitter.com/e6d7ysGXIq — Sunny Life (@Sunnyskies1111) June 1, 2024 Backup here: Did you know this is the original version of this very famous (or infamous?) photo…. Melania was in it before being cropped out. Strange! pic.twitter.com/SUPEnBE3Lb — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 8, 2025 And if you compare it to the version we’re all used to seeing you can see the tight crop eliminating Melania. I actually didn’t believe it was real until I looked into it myself, but it is indeed authentic that Melania was in this picture. Do I think Melania is “in the same club” as these Monsters? Hardly. I think she’s just a nice human being who posed for a photo while they were all at the same gathering. In fact, according to local KCBD, the gathering was First Lady Barbara Bush’s funeral on April 21, 2018: A photo of four past presidents and three first ladies at former First Lady Barbara Bush’s funeral on April 21, 2018 went viral. The image quickly went viral — a symbol of the strength and continuity of American democracy said a reporter for CNN Chris Cillizza. The man who took the original photo, Paul Morse is a New Orleans-based photographer. According to CNN, the photo was organized at the reception prior to the funeral service. It was taken before they walked into the service. Bill and Hillary Clinton, Barack and Michelle Obama and Melania Trump joined George H.W. Bush, George W. Bush and Laura Bush in the photo. The day after the photo went viral, the Lubbock County Democratic Party Headquarters posted the photo without a caption – however, it was missing one person. The photo had been cropped to show everyone except Melania Trump. When KCBD reached out to the Lubbock County Democratic Party Headquarters to learn why the photo was cropped, Leo Flores, the Vice Chair said, “It was an honest mistake.” He told KCBD he grabbed the photo from his (Facebook) feed and must have grabbed the wrong one. He said once he noticed the mistake, the post had more than 30 comments on it so he decided to leave it alone. He also said he got busy and has not edited the social media post to say it was an error. After speaking with KCBD, the post was edited and the caption of the photo now reads: I apologize for posting an incomplete picture. I didn’t realize anyone was missing until it was pointed out. Thank you for your concern. What do you think? Just an honest mistake? I have to say I like the picture a whole lot more with Melania NOT in it. I don’t like seeing her with these horrible people. So just like Bob Ross, I call the cropping out of Melania a “happy little accident”. Thoughts?

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis warned fellow Republicans that the results of Tuesday’s special congressional election in Tennessee should serve as a warning for the 2026 midterms. Although Republican Matt Van Epps defeated Democrat state Rep. Aftyn Behn for the U.S. House seat in Tennessee’s 7th Congressional District, he won by a significantly smaller margin than Trump in the 2024 election. The Florida governor warned that many voters won’t go to the polls when Trump isn’t on the ballot. “Special, off-year, and midterm elections historically benefit the party out of power because its voters are motivated to vote, while voters of the incumbent party become more complacent,” DeSantis said. “This is more glaring for today’s GOP because a chunk of voters who put them in power in 2024 are Trump-specific voters; they will vote GOP down ballot when Trump is running but won’t turn out to vote for a typical congressman in a midterm when Trump isn’t running,” he continued. Special, off-year, and midterm elections historically benefit the party out of power because its voters are motivated to vote, while voters of the incumbent party become more complacent. This is more glaring for today’s GOP because a chunk of voters who put them in power in 2024… https://t.co/DwFkk9pMzm — Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) December 3, 2025 Newsweek shared: The results of the closely watched special election in Tennessee showed a significant shift away from Trump since the 2024 election. Behn made gains in the urban and suburban part of the district, winning only Davidson County, which includes part of Nashville, while Van Epps carried the rural areas of the district. In every county in the district, there was a significant shift toward the Democratic candidate compared to the 2024 election. According to VoteHub, voters in the district’s counties shifted to the Democratic candidate by between 7 and 23 percentage points. Behn won Davidson County by 56.6 percentage points, a district Vice President Kamala Harris carried by 34 percentage points in 2024—a shift of 22.6 percentage points. The state representative also made gains in rural counties, with some shifting toward Democrats by more than 10 percentage points. In Perry County, which Trump won by almost 70 percentage points in 2024, Van Epps won by about 55 percentage points—a shift of almost 15 percent toward Democrats. In Montgomery County, where Trump had the smallest win margin of 18.5 percentage points, Van Epps won by about 8 percentage points, with voters shifting toward Democrats by more than 10 percentage points. “Every election that’s happened (since 2024) has been a 10 to 15 point swing towards the Democrats,” DeSantis told reporters, according to Tallahassee Democrat. “Overall, Republicans have underperformed, particularly when Trump wasn’t on the ballot,” he added. BREAKING: Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis sounds the alarm for 2026 that a portion of the GOP base ONLY votes when Donald Trump is on the ballot – and they must be INSPIRED to come out. "A chunk of voters who put them in power in 2024 are Trump-specific voters; they will vote GOP… pic.twitter.com/vBe65YzwNp — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 3, 2025 More from Tallahassee Democrat: DeSantis also dismissed a question about how the poor showings from Republicans, including in Virginia and New Jersey’s off-year elections, could complicate the push to redistrict several states to secure the GOP’s majority in the U.S. House. Even though DeSantis has bragged in the past about how his veto of the original congressional districts passed by the Legislature in 2022 helped produce new maps in which Republicans gained seats, helping the GOP win the U.S. House, he dismissed the idea of partisan gerrymandering. “Well, the redistricting is irrelevant because (the Legislature) is not allowed to use the partisan data. They have to just draw – and they will do that, that’s what our current map is,” DeSantis said. The comments come one day before the Florida House is poised to hold its first hearing on congressional redistricting during an atypical mid-decade election cycle.

A vaccine advisory panel hand-selected by Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is scheduled to vote on a recommendation that newborns receive the hepatitis B inoculation within 24 hours of birth. The panel, called the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, or ACIP, will debate and possibly delay the vaccination for children. HHS vaccine advisory panel to determine hepatitis B vaccine scheduling for children https://t.co/gvAI1hAasv — John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) December 4, 2025 USA TODAY shared more: When the committee met in September, it tabled a vote that would’ve recommended the first vaccine dose be delayed at least one month after birth for babies who are born to mothers who test negative for hepatitis B. While the committee meets Thursday, it’s unclear if or how long it will recommend postponing the first dose of the hepatitis B vaccine. Committee chair Kirk Milhoan told the Washington Post the timing of the delay in the first dose is “still being finalized.” In September, President Donald Trump said hepatitis B is often sexually transmitted so the vaccine should be delayed until age 12. But the virus also can be transmitted through sharing personal items such as razors and toothbrushes or exposure to blood though cuts or sores, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Doctors say maintaining the birth dose is important to protect newborns. Mothers might not know they have hepatitis B or lack access to testing and prenatal care. “The US is an outlier in recommending universal hepatitis B vaccine, and we would never approve a vaccine today based on the flimsy data used to initially approve the hepatitis B vaccine,” Dr. Mary Talley Bowden said. Bowden said that Tracy Beth Høeg, the acting director of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), shined a “voice of reason” at the ACIP meeting. Check it out: The US is an outlier in recommending universal hepatitis B vaccine, and we would never approve a vaccine today based on the flimsy data used to initially approve the hepatitis B vaccine.@TracyBethHoeg shines as the voice of reason in today’s ACIP meeting. pic.twitter.com/cDkc9kto0O — Mary Talley Bowden MD (@MaryBowdenMD) December 4, 2025 ACIP member Retsef Levi, PhD, said U.S. policy is “completely misaligned” with comparable countries. “They are potentially not convinced by the very confident arguments that you and others are making about the safety and the need and the benefits of having a birth dose for babies that were born to mothers that tested negative for Hep B,” he explained. Levi made a comparison to past arguments on the experimental mRNA jabs being recommended for children. Footage below: ACIP member Retsef Levi just calmly shredded the idea that every newborn needs a Hep B shot — a claim pushed hard by Big Pharma. “The policy in the US is completely misaligned with many countries that… care about their children just as much as we do.” “They are potentially not… pic.twitter.com/i1g27yesjG — MAHA Action (@MAHA_Action) December 4, 2025 CNBC provided further info: The birth dose recommendation was introduced in 1991 and is credited with driving down infections in kids by 99% since then. Maniar called that a “remarkable success story that we run the risk of reversing” if the committee changes the recommendation. Decisions by the panel are not legally binding, as it is up to states to mandate immunizations. But ACIP’s recommendations have significant implications for whether private insurance plans and government assistance programs cover the vaccines at no cost for eligible children. The panel’s upcoming two-day meeting in Atlanta comes after Kennedy earlier this year gutted the committee and appointed 12 new members, including some well-known vaccine critics. During the meeting in September, some advisors raised questions about whether the benefits of the shot outweigh potential safety risks.

For most homeowners, the renewal letter from your insurer no longer inspires confidence — it means a shake of the head and disbelief. A policy that was sensible a few years ago is now almost impossible to pay. Yet nothing changed about your home except the bill. When the cost of protecting your home rises by 50%, it’s no longer an inconvenience. It’s time to act. For decades, the insurance industry thrived on customer inertia. You bought a policy once and were expected to stay put. After all, who has time to compare every clause, deductible, or replacement-cost nuance? The industry counted on that. But now, when premiums rise faster than our income, that complacency carries a price you shouldn’t have to pay. There is a moment when a sensible homeowner acts. You suspect you’re overpaying. And make no mistake: millions of Americans are. The difference is that you have an advantage they don’t — you’re reading this, and you’re about to discover a simpler, smarter, faster way to compare home insurance. Imagine spending the next ten minutes the way most homeowners do: sighing at the renewal notice, promising yourself you’ll deal with it later. Now imagine spending those same ten minutes clicking through a streamlined quote tool that instantly tells you whether a better, more affordable policy is waiting for you. One path ends in frustration. The other may end in savings. The truth is this: insurers raise rates because they believe you won’t check. Once you do check, the entire dynamic changes. Competition works in your favor again. Carriers behave differently when they know you’re shopping. And with a modern quote tool, you can compare options with the same precision an agent uses — without the pressure, without the jargon, and without the commitment. You are smart enough to sense when a price hike is unjustified. You’re wise enough to know that loyalty should never cost more than it’s worth. And you’re capable — today — of finding out whether your rate is fair with one decisive click. Click here to see if you’re overpaying for your home insurance coverage. Picture the next year of your life. Will you continue paying the increased premium, hoping it comes back down? Or will you reclaim the satisfaction that comes from making an informed financial decision? A home is the biggest investment most people ever make. The insurance that protects it shouldn’t feel like a runaway expense. Some homeowners find that simply checking their options encourages their current provider to compete harder for their business. Others find that switching carriers saves them hundreds of dollars a year — sometimes more. The only homeowners who miss out are the ones who never run the comparison in the first place. Convenience should never stand between you and confidence. That’s why this quote tool exists. It eliminates the paperwork and guesswork. It asks the minimal number of questions. And it shows you — plainly and immediately — whether there’s a better match for your home and budget. The insurance industry is changing. Rates are fluctuating. And the smartest consumers are those who stay informed rather than trapped. A few minutes spent comparing policies could be the most profitable few minutes you spend all week. If you have ever wondered whether you’re overpaying, you deserve to know the answer. If you’ve ever suspected your loyalty is costing you extra, you deserve to verify it. And if you’ve ever promised yourself you’d “take a look at it later,” consider this your moment to finally follow through. Click now. See your options. Decide for yourself. Your home deserves protection — but you deserve a fair price. A better rate may be only one search away. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and I truly hope this can help make your life better!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)