100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed

100 Percent Fed Up Feed

@100percentfedupfeed

A 199-Year-Old Supreme Court Ruling Could Hand the President Unlimited Power this Summer
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

A 199-Year-Old Supreme Court Ruling Could Hand the President Unlimited Power this Summer

In 1827, the Supreme Court settled a question most Americans have never thought to ask: Who decides when America is in a state of “insurrection”? Their answer: the authority “belongs exclusively to the President.” And his decision is “conclusive.” In other words… We don’t need a vote from Congress. Or a sign-off from a judge. This summer… One man – Donald Trump – could over-rule every other branch of government – including the all-powerful “Deep State.” It may seem impossible. But history shows… Meanwhile, his rivals are gearing up for a fight. Democrat attorneys general say they’ll attack Trump in court if he dares to use this power.  But Jim Rickards — a former advisor to four Presidents, the CIA, and the Pentagon — says they will soon find out they’re wasting their breath. History shows he could be right. Because the age-old ruling behind Trump’s actions has never been overturned. It could all come to a head within weeks, this summer… Tipping American politics… and even the financial system into a melt-down unlike any we’ve seen in a century. Rickards’ free briefing is here. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!) This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post A 199-Year-Old Supreme Court Ruling Could Hand the President Unlimited Power this Summer appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

President Trump Rips Jeanine Pirro’s Stunning Move in Reflecting Pool Case: ‘What Was She Thinking?’
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

President Trump Rips Jeanine Pirro’s Stunning Move in Reflecting Pool Case: ‘What Was She Thinking?’

President Trump just made it crystal clear that he is not buying the Justice Department’s sudden retreat in the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool case. U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Pirro moved Friday to dismiss the felony vandalism case against former Olympian David Hearn. President Trump answered Saturday with a stunning public rebuke: “I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro.” His full statement did not leave much room for ambiguity: DAMN: President Trump takes to Truth Social to openly disagree with her assessment of the Reflecting Pool vandalism case. "I disagree 100% with Jeanine Pirro, the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, on the Reflecting Pool. I don’t know what she was thinking? To me, it… pic.twitter.com/MAe9zXQXA1 —

Kamala Harris Backs 13-Justice Supreme Court And Electoral College Overhaul Ahead Of Possible 2028 Run
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Kamala Harris Backs 13-Justice Supreme Court And Electoral College Overhaul Ahead Of Possible 2028 Run

Kamala Harris is no longer speaking in vague terms about changing the Supreme Court. She has put a number on it. Thirteen justices. And that was only one piece of the sweeping institutional overhaul Harris laid out Friday at the National Urban League Conference in Nashville. She also called for revisiting the Electoral College and renewed her support for statehood for Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. Harris delivered the package in her own words: Kamala Harris previews her 2028 agenda: eliminate the Electoral College, expand the Supreme Court to 13 justices, and grant DC and Puerto Rico statehood. This is the platform in her own words. pic.twitter.com/ahmXDf9gfB — Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) August 1, 2026 Calling this a reform agenda understates the scale of what she proposed. It is a proposal to rewrite the rules governing the Supreme Court, presidential elections and representation in Congress—all at once. The Fox News report on Harris’s Nashville appearance said she acknowledged the ideas would be controversial before arguing that the country should hold a “real conversation” about revisiting major institutions. Her remarks came during a Friday afternoon discussion at the National Urban League’s annual conference. On the Supreme Court, she went beyond the general expansion language she has used before and proposed a 13-seat bench, tying that number to what she described as 13 federal circuit courts. The proposal would add four seats to the current nine-member Court. She then placed the Electoral College and statehood for Puerto Rico and Washington, D.C., into the same political package. Each change would require Congress, the states or both to make decisions with consequences stretching far beyond one presidential term. The appearance came six months before the first major organizing stretch of the 2028 cycle and gave Harris a national stage in front of a key Democratic constituency. Harris has not formally entered the 2028 presidential race. She told the audience that a decision remains ahead and said her immediate focus is the midterm elections. The report also noted that she lost both the Electoral College and the popular vote to President Trump in 2024, making her call to revisit the presidential-election system more than an abstract policy exercise. But presidential candidates rarely wait until launch day to reveal the governing agenda they want activists, donors and party leaders to embrace. Harris just gave Democrats a preview. Paul Szypula posted a longer portion of the exchange, including Harris’s acknowledgment that the pitch would be controversial: Harris Continues Moving Further Left With Controversial 2028 Ideas Former Vice President Kamala Harris outlined several far-reaching proposals on Friday at the National Urban League Conference, continuing her clear shift further left. “I know this is going to be controversial… pic.twitter.com/ZUpQycaomw — Paul A. Szypula (@Bubblebathgirl) August 1, 2026 The Supreme Court has had nine seats since 1869. Congress has the power to change that number, but the power to do something is not the same as a reason to do it. Expanding the Court after losing control of its ideological direction would establish a brutal precedent: whenever one party dislikes the current majority, it can add enough seats to manufacture a new one. The next party in power could answer by adding more. Nine becomes 13. Thirteen becomes 17. The Court would stop looking like an independent branch and start looking like another prize handed to whichever party can assemble a temporary majority in Washington. The Electoral College proposal is just as consequential. President Trump’s 2024 victory over Harris included both the Electoral College and the national popular vote. Her decision to target the system now is especially revealing. The Electoral College is not a federal regulation a president can erase with a signature. It is embedded in the Constitution, and replacing it would require the difficult amendment process the founders designed for major structural changes. That difficulty is a feature. It prevents a temporary political coalition from casually rewriting the rules for choosing every future president. Statehood for Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico involves different legal and political questions, and Puerto Rico’s voters must determine what status they actually want. But placing both beside Court expansion and an Electoral College overhaul makes the political objective impossible to miss. The machinery of government itself is now part of the political target, alongside the ordinary fight to win under the rules that exist. Democrats spent years warning that American institutions were under attack. Now their last presidential nominee is openly discussing a larger Supreme Court, a different presidential-election system and two new states as part of the same national agenda. Voters deserve to hear that clearly, long before 2028. Harris may not have decided whether she is running. She has already told America what she wants to change if she does. The post Kamala Harris Backs 13-Justice Supreme Court And Electoral College Overhaul Ahead Of Possible 2028 Run appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

ICE Arrests Former Latvian ‘Dancing With The Stars’ Professional With Violent Criminal History
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

ICE Arrests Former Latvian ‘Dancing With The Stars’ Professional With Violent Criminal History

A former television dancer who entered the United States legally and then stayed illegally for nearly 14 years is now in ICE custody. His record in America is no dance card. Federal immigration officers arrested Roberts Nemiro in San Francisco after receiving a referral from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Nemiro once competed on Latvia’s version of “Dancing With the Stars.” According to federal officials, he later accumulated convictions for aggravated assault involving a gun and disorderly conduct, along with a series of other arrests. The Department of Homeland Security announced the arrest Saturday: DEGENERATE DANCER DETAINED: this illegal alien from Latvia once had a career as a professional dancer on TV, but has turned into a CAREER CRIMINAL. Roberts Nemiro, from Latvia, was previously a contestant on the Latvian equivalent of “Dancing with the Stars.” But since being in… pic.twitter.com/EzXjdODdX7 — Homeland Security (@DHSgov) August 1, 2026 The arrest is a sharp reminder that the illegal-immigration problem does not begin and end at the southern border. Visa overstays matter too. The New York Post reported that Nemiro entered the United States on a visa in October 2011. That visa expired in August 2012, but he remained in the country for almost 14 more years without lawful status. ICE officers arrested him in San Francisco on July 28 after USCIS provided information about his location. The referral shows that the arrest grew from information shared between federal immigration agencies, not a random street sweep. The report identified Nemiro’s convictions as aggravated assault of a non-family member with a gun and disorderly conduct. Those convictions form the proven core of the criminal history cited by federal officials. It separately listed arrests for battery, sexual battery, possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. Nemiro, 43, had previously appeared on “Dejo ar zvaigzni!,” Latvia’s version of the British competition “Strictly Come Dancing,” which American audiences know as “Dancing With the Stars.” DHS Assistant Secretary Lauren Bis said ICE made the arrest despite California’s sanctuary policies and that Nemiro would face deportation from the United States. He remains in federal immigration custody while those removal proceedings move forward. That distinction matters. An arrest is not a conviction, and the allegations tied only to arrests should not be described as proven offenses. What is not disputed is that Nemiro remained after his visa expired and is now being held in ICE custody pending removal proceedings. Independent journalist Breanna Morello posted the immigration timeline and criminal-history breakdown: ARRESTED ICE arrested Roberts Nemiro, a illegal alien from Latvia, in San Francisco after a referral from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Nemiro first entered the United States on a visa in October 2011 and illegally overstayed after it expired in August 2012. pic.twitter.com/FtKe3HUF6J — Breanna Morello (@BreannaMorello) July 31, 2026 Nemiro’s television background makes the arrest unusual, but the enforcement principle should be ordinary. A visa is permission to enter the country for a specific period. It is not a permanent pass, and it does not become one simply because the government fails to act when the expiration date arrives. When an overstayer later builds a violent criminal record, the cost of that failure becomes much more serious. The case also exposes one of the central weaknesses in the old immigration system. Different federal agencies can possess different pieces of the same file: one knows when the visa expired, another handles an immigration application, local authorities hold criminal records and ICE has the authority to make the immigration arrest. If those pieces are never connected, a removable alien can remain for years. Here, the USCIS referral gave ICE the lead it needed. That is how enforcement is supposed to work. DHS also emphasized that the arrest happened in California, where sanctuary policies routinely make cooperation between local authorities and federal immigration officers more difficult. Sanctuary politicians like to portray every immigration-enforcement action as an indiscriminate raid on otherwise law-abiding families. This case is the opposite. Federal officers identified a long-term visa overstayer with serious convictions, located him and placed him into removal proceedings. That is targeted enforcement focused on someone the government says should no longer be in the country. President Trump’s immigration agenda is often reduced by critics to slogans about the border. What are your thoughts? TAP HERE TO ADD YOUR VOTE But a functioning system requires more than stopping unlawful entry between ports of entry. It requires monitoring visa expirations, sharing information, prioritizing aliens with criminal records and following removal cases through to the end. Nemiro arrived as a legal visitor and stayed after that permission ended. Nearly 14 years later, federal officers finally brought the curtain down. The post ICE Arrests Former Latvian ‘Dancing With The Stars’ Professional With Violent Criminal History appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Florida Mail Carrier Was Accused Of Taking Cats Along Her Route—What Deputies Found Inside Her Home Was Even Worse
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Florida Mail Carrier Was Accused Of Taking Cats Along Her Route—What Deputies Found Inside Her Home Was Even Worse

For years, families along one Florida mail route may have had no idea what was happening after some neighborhood cats disappeared. Then a complaint about an allegedly taken cat led investigators to the home of a 77-year-old postal worker. What deputies say they found inside was so extreme that firefighters in hazardous-materials gear had to help make entry possible. Authorities removed 80 cats and 12 dogs from the Stuart-area home of Gail Giustino on July 20. Some of the animals were locked in cages. The house had no working air conditioning, little ventilation, and animal waste that investigators said had accumulated to a depth of one foot in places. Martin County Sheriff John Budensiek called it the worst animal-hoarding case he had seen in the county. Fox News brought national attention back to the case Saturday: A Florida mail carrier is accused of secretly collecting pets from her delivery route—and deputies say they uncovered more than 100 cats and dogs living in horrific conditions. It’s the “worst animal hoarding case” the sheriff has ever seen. Investigators say animals were found in sweltering, feces-filled conditions, while some missing pets were later reunited with heartbroken owners who had spent months searching for them. The 77-year-old postal worker faces misdemeanor animal cruelty-related charges as the investigation continues, and officials say more animals could still be recovered. pic.twitter.com/GIDkFQfoiu — Fox News (@FoxNews) August 1, 2026 The Number Tells Only Part Of The Story The detailed count from the search was 92 animals: 80 cats and 12 dogs. Fox described more than 100 cats and dogs connected with the investigation. That larger figure appears consistent with local reporting that Giustino allegedly surrendered approximately 15 animals to veterinary or shelter facilities during the week before deputies entered the home. Investigators are still asking animal shelters, veterinary offices, and rescue organizations to come forward if Giustino recently left animals with them. The case began with a report that a postal employee was taking cats along her delivery route. Authorities initially believed many of the animals were feral. But once the rescued animals reached the Humane Society of the Treasure Coast, microchips and frantic calls from local families told a more complicated story. At least five animals were connected with owners soon after the rescue. For those families, the cages did not hold anonymous strays. They held pets they had been searching for. Deputies Say The Heat Inside Was Stifling News4JAX reported that animal-control officers spent much of a week trying to inspect the home before investigators obtained a search warrant. During that period, the sheriff said Giustino surrendered approximately 15 animals to at least two facilities and then told investigators that all of her animals were gone. Authorities believed more remained inside and continued seeking access. When the warrant was executed, debris blocked the front entrance and forced crews to approach from the rear. Investigators found cages throughout the home, with many cats confined inside them and dogs that reportedly were not being walked outside. The outlet also reported that responders found no deceased animals during the initial search, an outcome Budensiek described with surprise given the heat and the condition of the house. Officials said at least one animal may have been injured by the overuse of flea spray. Once the door opened, officials said the air was thick with heat and odor. Interior temperatures were estimated above 100 degrees, and some reports placed the temperature near 110. Martin County Fire Rescue’s hazmat team ventilated the structure so deputies and animal-control officers could move through it safely. Despite the conditions, authorities said no dead animals were found during the initial search. That was the small mercy in an otherwise grim scene. NBC 6 South Florida showed the rescue operation and the conditions investigators confronted: A Decade Of Warning Signs According to the sheriff’s briefing, this was not Giustino’s first contact with animal control. Officials said she had received dozens of civil citations roughly a decade earlier over the confinement and care of animals. At that time, she reportedly complied with requirements intended to improve conditions, including adding window air-conditioning units. But investigators say the air-conditioning units were no longer working and the number of animals had again grown. The new investigation accelerated after the complaint involving a cat on her route. Animal-control officers attempted to gain access, but officials said Giustino did not cooperate. Deputies then obtained the warrant that exposed the full scale of the situation. WFTV reported that Giustino was charged with one misdemeanor count of animal cruelty and one misdemeanor count involving confinement without sufficient exercise. Her bond was set at $50,000. The station confirmed that the Sheriff’s Office Animal Services Division, the Humane Society of the Treasure Coast, and Martin County Fire Rescue all took part in the operation. Five animals had already been connected with owners when the local report was published, and investigators were still checking whether others had been reported missing. Officials also said Giustino appeared to believe she was helping the animals but had become unable to provide appropriate care. The Sheriff’s Office said it was trying to connect her with assistance while making sure the animals could not be returned to the same conditions. Missing-pet owners were directed to contact the agency so a formal report could be matched against the rescued animals. Those are allegations. Giustino is entitled to the presumption of innocence unless and until the charges are proven in court. Why Only Two Charges? With 92 animals removed from the home, the two-count charging decision immediately raised questions. Budensiek said deputies could have pursued far more charges. But he also said investigators did not believe Giustino set out to hurt the animals. In the sheriff’s account, she appeared to believe she was helping them—even as the conditions inside her home became dangerous and unmanageable. The goal, he explained, was to rescue the animals, stop her from acquiring more, and place the case on a path where intervention and accountability could occur together. That does not erase what the animals endured. It does explain why officials are treating this as more than a conventional cruelty prosecution. Families Finally Got A Chance To Search After the seizure, the animals were taken to the Humane Society of the Treasure Coast for examinations, food, water, clean bedding, and treatment. The shelter suddenly had to absorb nearly 100 animals at once while also helping families determine whether a long-missing pet might be among them. WPBF reported that dozens of families visited the shelter hoping for a reunion. Some had spent months searching, while others came because cats had vanished from the same streets. The shelter organized controlled identification periods so families could look through the rescued animals without disrupting veterinary care. Owners first had to file a lost-pet report with the Sheriff’s Office, giving investigators a record to compare with microchip data, photographs, and distinguishing features. One recovered cat had reportedly been missing since January. Other families arrived with photographs and the hope that a familiar face might be among the rows of carriers. The process also revealed why calling all of the cats feral would be premature. Some may have lived outdoors, but at least a portion had homes, names, and people who never stopped looking for them. Officials continued working through those claims as the remaining animals underwent medical and behavioral evaluations. That is the detail that changes the story. This house filled beyond capacity may also have been the end point of years of unanswered flyers, empty food bowls, late-night neighborhood searches, and owners wondering whether their pets would ever come home. Anyone who believes a missing animal may be connected with the case should file a lost-pet report with the Martin County Sheriff’s Office before arranging identification through the shelter. For the animals that survived, the door finally opened. For some families, so did the possibility of an answer. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Florida Mail Carrier Was Accused Of Taking Cats Along Her Route—What Deputies Found Inside Her Home Was Even Worse appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.