I just came across an old TruthSocial post from President Trump from three months ago back in September and I think there’s a huge message here! Allow me to explain…. This post was circulating online today and it caught my eye: FULL TEXT in case that’s hard to read: Pam: I have reviewed over 30 statements and posts saying that, essentially, “same old story as last time, all talk, no action. Nothing is being done. What about Comey, Adam “Shifty” Schiff, Leticia??? They’re all guilty as hell, but nothing is going to be done.” Then we almost put in a Democrat supported U.S. Attorney, in Virginia, with a really bad Republican past. A Woke RINO, who was never going to do his job. That’s why two of the worst Dem Senators PUSHED him so hard. He even lied to the media and said he quit, and that we had no case. No, I fired him, and there is a GREAT CASE, and many lawyers, and legal pundits, say so. Lindsey Halligan is a really good lawyer, and likes you, a lot. We can’t delay any longer, it’s killing our reputation and credibility. They impeached me twice, and indicted me (5 times!), OVER NOTHING. JUSTICE MUST BE SERVED, NOW!!! President DJT It caught my eye, but it sounded familiar to me so I researched it and as you can see from the date and time stamp shown in the bottom right, it’s from September 20, 2025. So….why am I showing you this? Did I discover some secret hidden encoded message? No. It’s better than that. It suddenly hit me looking back now three months after this was posted, and I realized this: When has President Trump ever just given up on something that was important to him? Certainly something as important as this? Never? I can’t think of one example. Once he hones in on something, he’s like a dog on a bone.  He pushes and pushes and pushes until he bends reality to his will. We’ve seen it time and time again. And that’s what struck me, so obvious now in hindsight….. Has President Trump continued to hit Pam Bondi? No. So the question then is why not? And I can only think of two explanations…. One, he got distracted and just forgot this was important to him. Or Two, that post got the response he wanted and Pam Bondi has sprung into gear, with big action being taken behind the scenes on these prosecutions that President Trump has seen and is pleased with. Now which of those two options do you think is most likely? It’s definitely not #1, and that’s what jumped out to me so powerfully when I saw this — it’s almost certainly #2. And that means 2026 is going to be a year to remember! A year for the history books! A year for JUSTICE! Get ready folks and keep your popcorn nearby….it’s about to get really fun!

Oh my goodness, I am dying laughing at this…. Imagine being SO dumb, SUCH low IQ that you think it’s a great idea to create an ad where it’s just audio of President Trump and Jasmine Crockett’s face with Trump calling her low IQ for 40 straight seconds! She’s literally spending money for the world to hear how dumb she is. Look, I get it, she’s going for the shock and sympathy factor, kind of a reverse psychology thing, but I think it’s going to backfire spectacularly. The only takeaway that’s going to lodge in people’s brains and memories is “Jasmine Crockett is low IQ”.  Take that to the bank. Watch here: And here she is proudly posting the ad to her X account: Texas, let’s win this thing. #JasmineForUS #TexasTough pic.twitter.com/VthTb93kur — Jasmine Crockett (@JasmineForUS) December 8, 2025 I’m almost entirely certain she has 0% chance of winning a Senate seat in Texas, and that really bums me out….. Because once she’s gone, I won’t have an excuse to play my EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE we obtained of when she took her Cognitive Test: JUST IN: EXCLUSIVE Footage Obtained Of Jasmine Crockett Taking Her Cognitive Test President Trump has long called Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) a "low IQ individual".... So much so that Jimmy Kimmel actually asked her about it recently, asking if she would be willing to take an IQ-test and go head-to-head against Donald Trump. Watch here: ? Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (D-TX) challenges President Donald Trump to an IQ test. KIMMEL: "He also called you low-IQ... would you be willing to take an IQ test publicly, head-to-head?" CROCKETT: "Absolutely. Absolutely! Absolutely!!" pic.twitter.com/y18u8ALhB1 — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 23, 2025 Well, I have EXCLUSIVE breaking news to share with you, and I honestly don't even know how we were able to pull this off, but I can report to you that WLT Report has become the first news outlet to obtain EXCLUSIVE FOOTAGE of Jasmine Crockett taking this cognitive exam. Yes folks, that's right -- no one else has this report. Let's just get right into it, here is exclusive video footage of the cognitive exam being administered to Jasmine Crockett: OH MY GOODNESS! I am dying laughing! Backup here if you need it: EXCLUSIVE Footage Obtained Of Jasmine Crockett Taking Her Cognitive Test pic.twitter.com/lBmbQEQ3UC — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) November 12, 2025 Sometimes you just gotta have a little fun and laugh a bit!

This is absolutely hilarious and so good! The Downs Syndrome community is filled with some of the best people you’ll ever meet in your life. Anyone who has ever interacted with someone who has Downs knows they’re amazing people. And I’m about to prove it to you again because it turns out the Downs community has had enough of Tim Walz being called a Retard….. They’re sick and tired of it! But not because they are mad about the use of the “R-word”. Nah… They have WAY more humor than that. They’re pissed off that anyone would ever compare Tim Walz to people with Downs because Walz is not SMART ENOUGH to ever be compared to them! So good! Watch here: Backup here on X if needed: URGENT MESSAGE FROM THE SPECIAL NEEDS COMMUNITY Please stop comparing us to Tim Walz.Tampon Timmy isn’t smart enough to be one of us. pic.twitter.com/VKidwTu2Uf — Jake (@JakeCan72) December 8, 2025 Right on my man, you rock!

Can you help me grant a birthday wish for the most awesome 107 year old lady you will see today? Meet Rosalie Cianelli. She’s turning 107 years old and she has one special request for her birthday: to meet the best President of her lifetime (and that includes 19 of them!). She’s also still out hustling and trying to build a following on Tik Tok (like and subscribe!) even at 107 years old! And she’s pumped about getting her Dividend Checks from Trump next year too. Let’s just say Rosalie is buying green bananas and thinking nothing of it! Watch here: @POTUS …. Can you make her birthday wish come true. She’s 107 and has lived through 19 Presidents. “He’s the best President of my lifetime.” pic.twitter.com/TRKxCdEZtE — ????? ?????? (@AprilSpark1890) December 5, 2025 TRANSCRIPT: Hi, everyone. President Trump says we’re going to get dividend checks pretty soon. I told you so. The best president of my lifetime. I’m going to be 107 years old this month and I’ve been through many presidents. Matter of fact, 19 presidents. I would love to go to the Capitol to visit President Trump. Maybe for my birthday this month we could arrange a meeting with him. Please tag President Trump and the White House in this video. My name is Rosalie Cianelli. I am from East Haven, Connecticut, and thank you for your help. Follow me for more videos. Rosalie, you are awesome! And since we have 5+ million monthly readers here, I am wondering if you all would pitch in and share this article for me and Rosalie?  Help us increase the chances that President Trump sees it. I know from many past experiences and confirmations that several people in Trump’s inner circle read WLT Report, so should out to all of you reading this now….please show POTUS and let’s make this happen! For Rosalie! p.s. The Far-Left is desperately trying to say Trump can’t run again in 2028 because he’ll be too old.  Nonsense!  Trump and Rosalie are cut from the same cloth.  If she’s still hustling Tik Tok at age 107, Trump at age 86 will be just fine!  THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.

It looks like we’re about to have some serious good news incoming soon from the Supreme Court! Constitutional Law is traditionally something that might make your eyes glaze over and put you to sleep, but after learning just how much our Country has been compromised by the Deep State and learning HOW they compromised us, it’s suddenly much more interesting. And one of their favorite tricks has been setting up and controlling Independent Agencies that answer to no one and can be easily controlled by a non-elected Deep State. They’re the Shadow Government — the 4th Branch of Government our Founders never envisioned and never wanted! And it looks like the Supreme Court is about to hand them the final nail in the coffin. Watch this: Gorsuch was on fire too. Watch here: GORSUCH: “Maybe it’s a recognition that Humphrey’s Executor was poorly reasoned and that there is no such thing in our constitutional order as a 4th branch of government…” pic.twitter.com/t2nfuMCESO — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) December 8, 2025 Mike Lee was there today for Oral Arguments and he is very encouraged with what he saw and heard. See here: I attended arguments at the Supreme Court today in Trump v. Slaughter SCOTUS has the chance to overturn *Humphrey’s Executor,* which would restore presidential authority over the executive branch, freeing us from bureaucratic tyranny This can’t happen a moment too soon https://t.co/hshBnkZh3o pic.twitter.com/p3J0UV3cUv — Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) December 8, 2025 In case any of that is confusing to you, I put together a really helpful and easy to understand summary of exactly what is going on here: Humphrey’s Executor — What It Was, Why It Matters Today, and Why the Supreme Court Hearing Looks Like a Win for Trump 1. What the case was Humphrey’s Executor (1935) said the President cannot fire commissioners of certain “independent agencies” unless Congress says he has specific cause (like misconduct).It involved President Roosevelt firing an FTC commissioner who disagreed with him. The Court blocked the firing and said Congress can insulate some agencies from presidential control. That one case created the legal foundation for the modern independent agency system — FTC, SEC, NLRB, FCC, and many others. It has been precedent for about 90 years. 2. Why it’s considered “on life support” now Over the last decade, the Supreme Court has repeatedly limited or criticized the logic of Humphrey’s Executor.The Court has suggested: The “quasi-legislative/quasi-judicial” idea from 1935 no longer fits what these agencies actually do. Modern independent agencies use real executive power, so the President may need real removal power. Several recent decisions have treated Humphrey’s as an outdated exception rather than a controlling rule. Because of that, legal scholars now openly say the case survives “in name only.” 3. Why overturning it would be a massive win for Trump If the Court kills or guts Humphrey’s Executor: Trump could fire commissioners at the FTC, SEC, NLRB, and others immediately, without waiting for their terms to expire. He could install loyal leadership across the regulatory state far faster. It would supercharge his ability to reshape policy, from energy to tech to labor to finance. It would validate the firings he has already carried out and clear legal obstacles ahead. In short, overturning the case would give Trump full Article II control over the executive branch — exactly the authority he and his supporters argue the Constitution already gives him. 4. Why supporters say overturning it restores the Constitution The pro-Trump / pro-unitary-executive argument is simple: The Constitution says all executive power is vested in the President. If an agency exercises executive power, its leaders must answer to the President, not be insulated by Congress. Humphrey’s carved out a “fourth branch” of government not described anywhere in the Constitution. Overturning it would return to a clear structure:Congress makes the laws. The President executes them. Courts interpret them.No semi-independent commissions floating in between. 5. What happened today at the Supreme Court Today’s case — Trump v. Slaughter — asks whether Trump can fire an FTC commissioner without cause, even though current law (based on Humphrey’s) says he can’t. What happened in the hearing: Trump’s legal team directly asked the Court to overrule Humphrey’s Executor completely. The conservative justices were highly skeptical of the 1935 rule and repeatedly pressed that modern agencies wield executive power. The liberal justices defended the existing system but were clearly in the minority. The tone of questioning strongly suggested the Court is ready to: Uphold Trump’s firing, and Potentially overturn or severely limit the 1935 precedent. The consensus from observers:This looked like a very strong day for Trump. 6. Why today’s hearing signals a likely Trump victory The conservative majority clearly treated Humphrey’s as outdated. They emphasized the President’s constitutional removal power. They showed little patience for the argument that the FTC should be insulated from a President. Even if they don’t formally “overrule” the 1935 case, the Court appears prepared to narrow it so drastically that Trump effectively gets everything he wants:the power to remove independent-agency leaders at will. Kavanaugh and Alito were on fire today: JUST IN: SCOTUS Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Sam Alito NUKE the “independent commission” scam, an apparent win for Trump Their argument: Can Congress just make ANY Cabinet office an “independent commission,” thereby DESTROYING the presidency? KAVANAUGH: “Independent agencies… pic.twitter.com/4dENQkZD56 — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 8, 2025 For anyone paying special attention to what the Supreme Court has been doing recently, you might say this sounds a whole lot like when they overturned the longstanding (and wildly Unconstitutional) Chevron Doctrine. And you’d be 100% right! Here’s how they related and why the Supreme Court killing Chevron means they will almost certainly also kill Humphreys: How Humphrey’s Executor and Chevron Overruling Fit Together 1. Chevron dealt with judicial deference When the Court overturned Chevron, it killed the idea that courts must normally defer to an agency’s interpretation of an ambiguous statute.Result: Courts, not agencies, now decide what the law means. That ruling weakens agencies’ power to interpret laws. 2. Humphrey’s Executor deals with presidential control Humphrey’s is about who controls the agencies, specifically whether the President can fire their leaders at will. Overturning it would weaken agencies’ independence by giving the President direct authority over their leadership. 3. Both rulings target the same underlying structure Put simply: Overturning Chevron → agencies lose power over what the law means. Overturning Humphrey’s → agencies lose power to defy the President. Together, these changes strip away two pillars of the modern administrative state: Deference power (Chevron) Independence power (Humphrey’s) 4. Why the two decisions complement each other Once Chevron fell, agencies lost the ability to say:“The courts must defer to us.” If Humphrey’s falls, they also lose the ability to say:“The President can’t fire us.” Resulting system: Agencies become more accountable to elected leadership. Courts become more assertive in interpreting statutes. The President gains far more control over agency direction. Bureaucratic autonomy shrinks dramatically. Think of it like a two-step dismantling of the old structure: Step 1 (Chevron): Courts stop deferring → limits agencies’ legal authority.Step 2 (Humphrey’s): President can remove leadership → limits agencies’ political independence. 5. Why this matters specifically for Trump Trump’s agenda requires agencies to follow his direction quickly, not resist him through: lengthy rulemaking internal opposition staggered commissioner terms “for cause” firing protections broad interpretations of old laws Chevron’s death already removed one obstacle.If Humphrey’s dies too, Trump gains the ability to: Fire resistant commissioners instantly Install people aligned with his policies Halt regulatory actions he opposes Reorient the federal bureaucracy in months, not years Re-read that last one…. THIS IS HUGE FOLKS! A true game-changer. We need this!!