Arthritis is not just “a little joint pain.” It’s a constant, grinding ache — the kind of ache it is hard to find any relief from. And what’s behind it all? Inflammation. The same kind of inflammation that wreaked havoc in severe COVID-19 cases is also attacking joints in those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA). Swelling. Stiffness. Breakdown. It’s the same enemy wearing a different mask. Your body uses chemicals called cytokines to call for backup when there’s injury or infection. But sometimes these chemical messengers go rogue. They call in the immune system as if it were an emergency. So, instead of healing, there is more pain, more damage, more swelling. Scientists have named the three worst offenders: The “Inflammatory Triad” that hijacks your body’s natural defenses These bad actors flip powerful switches inside your cells — NF-κB, MAPK, JAK/STAT — and set off chain reactions that cause joints to deteriorate and your body to spiral into chronic inflammation. In other words, you experience pain all the time. This is where ivermectin rushes in. Originally developed to fight parasites, ivermectin has shown powerful anti-inflammatory potential. Research suggests it can help calm the same inflammatory signals that drive arthritis — blocking NF-κB, the “master switch” of inflammation, and dialing down pathways like MAPK and JAK/STAT. The result? Less swelling, reduced tissue breakdown, and relief from persistent joint pain. For over 30 years, ivermectin has been trusted worldwide — Nobel Prize–winning, FDA-approved, and proven safe for millions. Now, science is uncovering its broader potential to support inflammation and joint health. Where to Get American Made Ivermectin We know Ivermectin works, but how can we guarantee that the Ivermectin you order is actually made here in the USA – not in China? That’s where The Wellness Company comes in! The Wellness Company and its freedom-fighting medical experts – like Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Kelly victory – are the gold standard for providing safe, effective and affordable medical solutions. The Wellness Company’s doctors are the doctors who courageously told the truth during the pandemic and they continue to be the nation’s leading voices for putting the health and well-being of the American people above the greed and profits of big pharma and the medical establishment. The Wellness Company is offering Ivermectin that is 100% made in America! Not Just Made in America – But at a Price You Can’t Beat Not only is The Wellness Company offering you Ivermectin made in the USA, it is offering it to you at a price you can’t beat! While most other pharmacies are charging $5 a tablet for Ivermectin, often for lower dosage, The Wellness Company is offering higher dosage Ivermectin (18mg) a just $3.33 a tablet! About TWC’s Ivermectin Long Proven Therapy — Prescribed globally for over 30 years and awarded the Nobel Prize in Medicine, Ivermectin has a wide range of uses outside of COVID-19 including eliminating a wide spectrum of parasites that impact health and wellbeing. Convenient 6-Month Supply — Each order includes 84 capsules (18mg each), designed for four 21-day cleanse cycles with 14-day breaks in between. This structure supports effective parasite management with only two fills per year. Affordable & Trusted — A streamlined regimen at a lower price point than combination therapies, while maintaining a strong safety profile and decades of clinical use. Discover what a calmed down inflammatory system feels like. Start your journey to better joint health today. Don’t wait – order a 6-month supply of Ivermectin today! (Note: The information provided is intended for generalized informational purposes only and should not be considered personal medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications. Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the links provided, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to keep you SAFE and HEALTY!)

A woman from Minnesota died in the U.S. Virgin Islands after a shark ripped her arm off. According to the U.S. Virgin Islands Police Department, Arlene Lillis, 56, was pronounced dead after the attack. The attack happened at Dorcsh Beach on St. Croix. Several people called 911, and a nurse attempted to save her by swimming to her side. Sad News: A Minnesota woman died on Thursday after a shark chomped her arm off while she was visiting the U.S. Virgin Islands pic.twitter.com/RcmCgB0m3K — The Calvin Coolidge Project (@TheCalvinCooli1) January 10, 2026 NBC News has more: First responders on the island of St. Croix were called at about 4:28 p.m. local time with reports of “a female who was suspected to be bitten by a shark at Dorsch Beach,” according to a Virgin Islands Police Department statement. Firefighters “confirmed that the female lost an arm during the attack” and she “later succumbed to her injures,” police said. The victim was identified as 56-year-old Arlene Lillis of Detroit Lakes, in northwest Minnesota near the border with North Dakota. Christopher Carroll, a registered nurse from Spanish Fork, Utah who was on vacation with his wife, heard a woman screaming from the water and he frantically swam out to help her. “When I got maybe 10, 15 yards from her, I could see all the blood in the water, and that’s when I realized, ‘Oh, God, this is a shark attack or something,’ ” Carroll told NBC News. There were some reports of a possible second victim, but rescue crews did not find anyone else. “I knew it was a big, big shark,” Carroll said, according to NBC News. “And that was the most terrifying moments … knowing that there’s blood in the water, knowing there’s a very large shark that’s aggressive and not knowing if it’s still there. Is it coming back? Is it going to come back for her? Is it going to hit me?” he continued. World News Tonight provided video coverage: A Minnesota woman visiting the U.S. Virgin Islands has been killed after suffering a shark bite. First responders on the scene indicated that the 56-year-old woman lost her arm and later died from her injuries. @VictorOquendo has details. https://t.co/JLoMl2zrh1 pic.twitter.com/tt2iP6GFTr — World News Tonight (@ABCWorldNews) January 10, 2026 Fox News shared further: Police have not shared if the shark has been located, or what led to the attack. “Our hearts are with the family and loved ones of the victim, and with everyone who witnessed this tragedy,” Gov. Albert Bryan Jr. wrote in a statement. “We have been briefed on the information known at this time, and we are grateful to the bystanders who acted immediately to render aid and to the first responders who worked urgently and bravely in an effort to save her life.” Lt. Gov. Tregenza A. Roach also expressed condolences and gratitude to first responders. “On behalf of the people of the Virgin Islands, I extend our deepest condolences to the victim’s family and all who are grieving this loss,” Roach wrote. “In moments like this, we are reminded how quickly life can change. We thank the individuals on the scene who stepped forward to help, and we commend our first responders for their swift action and professionalism under extremely difficult circumstances.” The investigation is ongoing, according to authorities.

Florida officials announced alarming results after testing numerous infant formula brands for the presence of toxins. “Governor Ron DeSantis, First Lady Casey DeSantis, and Surgeon General Dr. Joseph Ladapo announced the release of infant formula testing results, reinforcing Florida’s commitment to transparency, accountability, and putting families first,” a press release read. “The Florida Department of Health tested 24 infant formula products widely available in Florida and found elevated levels of heavy metals like mercury in 16, pointing to systemic problems in sourcing or manufacturing,” DeSantis said. “That’s why Florida has stepped up to protect our most vulnerable, working with federal partners to drive accountability and give families more options. Thanks to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., families on WIC will be able to select from a wider variety of infant formulas if they want to switch products based on the findings of the Healthy Florida First Initiative,” he continued. “We are giving Florida families the information they need and the ability to choose the best infant formula for their babies,” DeSantis wrote on X. “We’re grateful to @SecKennedy and HHS for allowing WIC to cover a wider variety of infant formulas, so that families can more easily make the switch to a non-toxic product for their baby’s well-being,” he added. We are giving Florida families the information they need and the ability to choose the best infant formula for their babies. We’re grateful to @SecKennedy and HHS for allowing WIC to cover a wider variety of infant formulas, so that families can more easily make the switch to a… pic.twitter.com/QKeTw4LvFb — Ron DeSantis (@GovRonDeSantis) January 9, 2026 More from the Tampa Bay Times: The commission, led by Florida first lady Casey DeSantis and Lt. Gov. Jay Collins, was launched last year to support and amplify federal efforts by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the U.S. secretary of health and human services, to examine the causes of chronic diseases. State-run labs tested 24 brands of formula for pesticides and four heavy metals: mercury, cadmium, arsenic and lead. Ingesting heavy metals at high levels over time is harmful to people, especially infants, because they can accumulate in the body’s tissue and cause poisoning, along with brain damage, kidney and liver failure. Florida found elevated levels of at least one heavy metal or pesticide in 16 brands of formula. It did not specify which pesticides were part of the tests. The state says it detected the most toxins, arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury in Similac Soy Isomil powder. The state found varying levels of each contaminant in the formula, including a maximum of 14.99 parts per billion of lead. That number far exceeds what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said is safe for drinking water, which is no amount of lead. While it does provide guidance on what nutrients should be in baby formula, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not approve infant formulas. Two other formulas had three toxins detected, according to the state: Enfamil Prosobee and Enfamil Infant NeuroPro Ready to Use. “As a mother, there is nothing more important than protecting our children, and that starts with being able to trust what is in their food,” said First Lady Casey DeSantis. “Families deserve full transparency and the truth, especially when it comes to products marketed for infants. That is why the Commission under the Healthy Florida First initiative is demanding accountability and putting parents first, so Floridians have the information they need to make confident, informed decisions for their families,” she added. Watch some of her comments below: NEW: Florida has become the first state in the nation to launch independent testing of baby formula for hazardous chemicals and heavy metals First Lady Casey DeSantis announced the move today: "Florida now is the first state in the nation stepping into the fold as a major force… pic.twitter.com/dFIRH1voQ9 — Florida’s Voice (@FLVoiceNews) January 9, 2026 Florida Phoenix noted: In his remarks, Ladapo contended the results produced an “understatement of the risk” because infants can be subject to greater harm given their size, weight, and developmental stage. He added that, of the items tested, “mercury is probably one of the most toxic things you can put in a person’s body.”

President Trump on Friday said he would meet with Colombian President Gustavo Petro during the first week of February. “I look forward to having a meeting with Gustavo Petro, the President of Colombia, in the White House, during the first week of February. I am sure it will work out very well for Colombia, and the U.S.A., but, cocaine and other drugs must be STOPPED from coming into the United States,” Trump said. Trump’s confirmation of the meeting follows a phone call with Petro earlier this week. President Trump Holds Call With Colombian President Gustavo Petro NBC News has more: The Colombians asked members of Congress to help set up a phone call between Petro and Trump, which the Colombian government had wanted for some time. The official said the mediation paid off, with the two leaders speaking by phone on Wednesday, shortly before Petro was set to lead nationwide demonstrations in support of the country’s sovereignty. The Trump-Petro call resulted in a dramatic de-escalation in tensions between the two men, with both leaders praising each other and announcing plans for a meeting in Washington next month. Colombia’s Defense Minister Pedro Sánchez told NBC News on Thursday that he planned to travel to Washington along with Petro to meet with American officials — and that he no longer had concerns the U.S. would launch a military attack on his country. “I trust in the word of the president of the United States,” he said, adding that the conversation had been a crucial “icebreaker” for the two leaders and countries. Something Trump said on the call made a particular impression on Petro, the Colombian leader said in a Thursday interview with NBC News partner Telemundo. “I know you have been surrounded by lies like I have,” Petro said Trump had told him during a 55-minute telephone conversation. Trump previously said Petro should “watch his a**” following the military operation that resulted in the capture of Nicolás Maduro. WATCH: President Trump Says Colombian President Should “Watch His A**” “He has cocaine mills. He has factories where he makes cocaine. And yeah, I think I stick by first statement,” Trump said. “He’s making cocaine, and they’re sending it into the United States. So, he does have to watch his a**,” he added. Check it out: NOW - Trump says Colombian President Gustavo Petro has "to watch his ass" as he's making cocaine and sending it to the U.S. pic.twitter.com/H2ctUOmX9O — Disclose.tv (@disclosetv) January 3, 2026 Axios shared further: Petro told supporters in Bogota on Wednesday that he initiated the call that went on for more than an hour in order to decrease tensions with the U.S. and restore dialogue. "In the conversation ... I made a request: that direct communications between the foreign ministries and the presidents be reestablished. If there is no dialogue, there will be war," Petro said, noting the call was respectful. Petro said he explained to Trump what his government has been doing against drug trafficking and presented him with data. He noted that he discussed with Trump the situation in Venezuela.

The New York Post is reporting that Bill and Hillary Clinton are facing contempt of Congress charges. See here: Bill and Hillary Clinton face contempt of Congress for dodging on Epstein subpoenas again https://t.co/AC4QPChTw5 pic.twitter.com/ktbLeemshI — New York Post (@nypost) January 9, 2026 To be fair and a little more clear, they WILL face contempt of Congress charges if they don’t show up to testify next week when required to do so. The reason this is a story now is that they already dodged one date and they still have not confirmed they plan to attend next week. What?  Bill and Hillary being shady?  Color me shocked!  [sarcasm alert!] Here is more from the NY Post: Bill and Hillary Clinton are facing contempt of Congress charges if they don’t appear before a House committee next week to testify in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. The couple was originally scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee in December but those appearances were moved to January 13 for him and the 14th for her at the request of the couple, who cited a conflict. But now they haven’t confirmed they will be there next week. And Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.), the chairman of the panel, said he’ll slap them with contempt if they don’t show. “The Clintons have not confirmed their appearances for their subpoenaed depositions,” a spokesperson for the committee told the New York Post. “They are obligated under the law to appear and we expect them to do so. If the Clintons do not appear for their depositions, the House Oversight Committee will initiate contempt of Congress proceedings.” Ok so now the most obvious question: what real penalties or consequences might they actually face? Here’s a good summary: Contempt of Congress Enforcement and Penalties The most extreme penalties for Contempt of Congress depend on the method used by Congress to enforce it. There are primarily two relevant paths in modern practice: criminal contempt (the statutory route under 2 U.S.C. § 192) and inherent contempt (Congress’s direct, non-statutory authority, rarely used today). Criminal Contempt of Congress (Most Common Modern Path) This is the standard process where Congress certifies a contempt citation to the U.S. Attorney for potential prosecution in federal court. It is a misdemeanor offense for willfully refusing to appear, testify, or produce documents in response to a valid subpoena. Maximum penalties upon conviction: Imprisonment: Up to 12 months (1 year) in jail. Fines: Up to $100,000 (with a minimum fine of $100 in the original statute, though the fine cap has been adjusted upward over time via general federal sentencing provisions). Sentencing Details: Minimum imprisonment in some descriptions: Not less than one month (30 days). Judicial Discretion: Actual sentences are often lighter, determined by a judge considering federal sentencing guidelines (e.g., Steve Bannon served 4 months in 2024 after his 2022 conviction). Execution: This is the route typically threatened or used in high-profile cases involving subpoenas, as it relies on the Department of Justice for prosecution (which can decline, especially in executive privilege disputes). Inherent Contempt (Rare and Extreme Direct Enforcement) Congress can exercise its inherent (constitutional) power to hold someone in contempt without referring to the courts or DOJ. This involves the House or Senate conducting its own proceedings, potentially arresting/detaining the person via the Sergeant-at-Arms, and imposing punishment directly. Historical Context: Historically, this has included short-term imprisonment (e.g., 10 days in a 1934 Senate case), but punishment generally cannot extend beyond the end of the current congressional session. Modern Proposals: Modern proposals and attempts (e.g., resolutions in recent years) have focused on monetary fines rather than detention, with suggested caps like $100,000 total or escalating daily fines (e.g., $10,000 per day in failed 2024 attempts). Practical Limitations: No recent successful use of inherent contempt has imposed extreme long-term penalties, and legal opinions (especially from the executive branch) often challenge its application against officials citing executive privilege. Summary of Findings In summary, the harshest realistic maximum under current law and precedent is up to 1 year in prison plus a $100,000 fine via criminal contempt prosecution. Inherent contempt theoretically allows for immediate detention or fines but has not been used for severe, prolonged punishment in modern times and remains limited by practical and constitutional constraints. Prosecution and severe outcomes are rare due to political discretion and separation-of-powers issues.