The United States military carried out another defensive strike near the Strait of Hormuz on Wednesday, taking out an Iranian ground control station and four drones that posed a threat to U.S. forces in the area. The strike came just hours after President Trump made his position unmistakably clear during a Cabinet meeting at the White House: Iran is running out of leverage, and he will not be rushed into a bad deal. “Iran is negotiating on fumes,” Trump told reporters, adding that he is “not satisfied yet” with the state of nuclear talks. He also swatted away any suggestion that upcoming midterm elections would pressure him into accepting weak terms from Tehran. *TRUMP: NOT SATISFIED YET ON IRAN DEAL*TRUMP: IRAN IS NEGOTIATING ON FUMES — GURGAVIN (@gurgavin) May 27, 2026 The combination of live military action and Trump’s blunt public posture sends a message that should be impossible for Tehran to misread. The diplomatic window is open, but the clock is ticking, and U.S. firepower is not standing down in the meantime. ABC News reported on the direct exchange from the Cabinet meeting: President Trump told reporters that Iran appeared to be calculating around the American political calendar, with Tehran hoping he would feel pressure to settle before the midterm elections. He rejected that premise in plain terms, saying he did not care about the midterms in this negotiation. When asked whether high gas prices and travel costs made him more eager to close a deal quickly, Trump kept the focus on national security. He said the primary urgency is preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, not calming a campaign narrative or rushing into a weak settlement. ABC News also noted that Trump said sanctions relief and money were not on the table at that moment. He said the United States still controlled funds Iran claimed as its own, and that Tehran would get access only when it behaved properly and did what was right. The same exchange captured the central Trump position: talks can continue, but Iran does not get a shortcut around the nuclear issue. He described himself as unsatisfied with the current offer and left military escalation on the table if the regime refuses to move. Trump went further, warning that if Iran does not meet the terms the United States has laid out, “we may have to finish the job.” That leaves little ambiguity. That is a president telling a hostile regime exactly where the red line is. AP laid out Wednesday’s military action near the strait: U.S. forces shot down four Iranian one-way attack drones that officials said posed a threat around the Strait of Hormuz. The military also struck an Iranian ground control station in Bandar Abbas that was preparing to launch another drone, according to U.S. officials cited in the report. The new action landed inside a fragile ceasefire environment and followed earlier defensive strikes on missile-launch sites and minelaying boats in southern Iran. Washington has said those actions were restrained responses to immediate threats, even as the diplomatic track remains unsettled. The broader deal conversation still turns on hard questions: reopening the Strait of Hormuz, neutralizing Iran’s highly enriched uranium stockpile, and preventing Tehran from using sanctions relief to rebuild military capability. Republican skeptics including Roger Wicker, Lindsey Graham, and Ted Cruz have warned that any settlement resembling the Obama-era nuclear framework would be too favorable to Iran. The report also placed the uranium question beside the regional-security question. Iran wants Lebanon and proxy operations considered inside the ceasefire framework, while the United States and Israel are trying to preserve room for action against imminent threats. The strike details were attributed to U.S. officials, and CENTCOM has not released a full public statement at the time of this writing. American forces have acted defensively in the area more than once in recent weeks. The pattern is consistent: when Iranian assets threaten U.S. personnel or international shipping lanes, the military responds. JUST IN: Trump says he feels no political pressure to make a deal with Iran — Kalshi (@Kalshi) May 27, 2026 Trump’s posture on the deal itself has been just as aggressive on paper. Over the weekend, he posted on Truth Social that Iran’s enriched uranium must be “immediately turned over to the U.S. or destroyed in Iran” as a condition of any agreement. Breitbart reported on the demand: President Trump said Iran’s enriched uranium should either be turned over to the United States for destruction or destroyed in place inside Iran with an atomic-energy authority or equivalent witness present. That demand put the uranium stockpile at the center of the settlement conversation rather than leaving it as a vague promise to be handled later. The report tied Trump’s demand to earlier reporting that Tehran had broadly committed to surrendering near-weapons-grade uranium, one of the key issues in the talks. It also noted the competing Iranian position that the stockpile should stay inside the country, which is exactly why the disposal mechanism matters. If Iran keeps control of the material, the deal looks weak and Tehran can claim it preserved the heart of its nuclear leverage. If the material is removed or verifiably destroyed, President Trump can point to a concrete result that goes far beyond paper assurances. That is the reason the transfer-or-destroy language matters. It turns the negotiation from a public-relations promise into a measurable test of whether Iran is actually giving up the dangerous material or merely buying time. Some Republican lawmakers have expressed skepticism about whether any deal with the Iranian regime can be trusted. That skepticism is earned. Iran has violated every nuclear agreement it has ever signed, and its proxies continue to destabilize the Middle East. The current posture looks nothing like Obama-era diplomacy. There are no pallets of cash, no secret side deals, and no easing of sanctions before Iran delivers. Trump is negotiating from a position of military and economic strength, and he is telling the world he is perfectly comfortable walking away. The broader strategic picture includes the Abraham Accords framework, which Trump is working to expand. A credible Iran deal, or the credible threat of military action if no deal materializes, strengthens America’s hand with every partner in the region. Tehran can negotiate now, under maximum pressure and with its economy under strain, or it can find out what “finish the job” means. That is the choice President Trump is offering, and there is nothing ambiguous about it. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr set the internet ablaze when a video surfaced of him using methylene blue while on a flight. Methylene blue is just now getting widespread attention, however, according to The New York Post: In recent years, celebrities, wellness influencers and biohackers have touted methylene blue for several off-label uses, claiming it can boost energy levels and metabolism, enhance cognitive function and combat aging — though evidence remains limited. Early research suggests that methylene blue may have antioxidant properties that help reduce toxic proteins in the brain, potentially aiding in the prevention of neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. Some studies also indicate that the drug may help delay skin aging by stimulating the production of collagen and elastin, reducing cellular damage and promoting wound healing. WHAT IS METHYLENE BLUE? First used in the 1800s as a textile dye, visionary physician Paul Ehrlich discovered methylene blue’s antimicrobial properties against malaria—making this the first synthetic drug in modern medicine. Today, this century-old compound is FDA-approved for methemoglobinemia (a condition in which the blood can’t carry oxygen properly) but has garnered renewed interest for its off-label applications, particularly in enhancing mitochondrial function, combating neurodegenerative diseases, and as adjunct treatment of long COVID. How methylene blue works and its “off-label” uses: Energy Backup: Methylene blue acts like a “backup generator” for your cells’ energy factories (mitochondria). When part of the energy production line (specifically “Complex I”) breaks down—due to toxins, disease, or aging—methylene blue moves electrons directly to later stages of the energy-making process, allowing cells to keep producing energy (ATP) even when parts of the system are damaged. Oxidative Stress Reduction: It acts like a molecular sponge, soaking up harmful molecules called reactive oxygen species (ROS) that damage cells. By neutralizing these destructive molecules, it reduces oxidative stress—a key contributor to aging and diseases like Alzheimer’s. It also blocks caspase-6, an enzyme that drives brain inflammation and kills neurons in Alzheimer’s patients. Think of it as a two-in-one protector: it calms oxidative damage while stopping the enzyme that fuels brain cell death. Promising Off-Label Applications: Neurodegenerative diseases: Low doses enhance cerebral metabolism, improving outcomes in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s models. It also reduces swelling in traumatic brain injury victims. Chronic fatigue and Long COVID: Due to its ability to reduce oxidative stress and promote mitochondrial function, methylene blue shows promise in relieving long COVID symptoms. Septic shock and vasoplegic syndrome: By inhibiting nitric oxide synthase, it restores vascular tone. Malaria adjunct therapy: It disrupts Plasmodium metabolism, reducing parasitemia. HOW YOU CAN GET METHYLENE BLUE The medical experts at The Wellness Company – like Dr. Peter McCullough – were leaders in the efforts to provide the public with accurate medical information during COVID. These experts have repeatedly shown that they prioritized the health and welfare of their patients over the bottom line of the big pharmaceutical companies. Now the experts at The Wellness Company are making methylene blue available to you at home with RECHARGE! Recharge is the first-ever combination of Methylene Blue, NAD, and PQQ, all packed into tablets that avoid the blue tongue and the mess. – Methylene Blue protects the mitochondria and keeps them running efficiently. – NAD, a coenzyme found in every cell in your body, is the fuel your mitochondria needs for energy production and repair enzymes. – PQQ is a vitamin-like compound that boosts mitochondrial production. This powerhouse trio supports cognition, energy, and longevity! RECHARGE has been scientifically formulated with research-backed ingredients to enhance mental clarity and focus. Methylene Blue, NAD and PQQ are a powerful combo for enhanced cognitive function and ultimate mitochondrial health. Click here to add Methylene blue to your healthcare regimen today. (Note: The information provided is intended for generalized informational purposes only and should not be considered personal medical advice or used as a substitute for professional healthcare guidance. It is your responsibility to comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and guidelines regarding the purchase, possession, and use of prescription medications. Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the links provided, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support and the opportunity to keep you SAFE and HEALTY!) This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

The Justice Department has opened a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, the longtime magazine columnist who accused President Trump and later won massive civil judgments against him. The focus, according to CNN, is whether Carroll committed perjury in testimony connected to her lawsuits. At the center is a 2022 deposition statement about who was funding her legal fight. The Justice Department has launched a criminal investigation into E. Jean Carroll, who accused Trump of sexual assault, according to sources https://t.co/02wWEO1bXq pic.twitter.com/Va0IXG16wj — CNN (@CNN) May 27, 2026 The issue is simple enough for normal people to understand. Carroll said under oath that no outside party was paying for her lawsuit. It later came out that billionaire Democrat donor Reid Hoffman had covered some legal fees and expenses. CNN details the investigation and the funding dispute now under federal review: The Justice Department investigation is focused on whether Carroll committed perjury in testimony tied to her two civil lawsuits against President Trump. Prosecutors are looking at a 2022 deposition in which Carroll said she had received no outside funding for her lawsuit, even though it was later revealed that Reid Hoffman had paid some legal fees and expenses. Senior Justice Department officials referred the matter to federal prosecutors in Chicago, according to the report. Carroll’s deposition occurred in New York, but one person connected to the funding issue, Hoffman, has a nonprofit based in Chicago. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche is recused from the matter because he previously worked as one of Trump’s personal attorneys on Carroll appeals. CNN also noted that Alina Habba argued at the time that Carroll’s team had concealed the funding issue. Judge Lewis Kaplan allowed another deposition but kept the Hoffman funding question away from the trial jury. That means the funding issue existed before trial, but jurors never heard the full fight over it. That is the legal problem now sitting in front of prosecutors. It does not mean Carroll has been charged. It means DOJ is investigating whether the funding answer she gave under oath crossed a criminal line. Exclusive: Justice Department launched a criminal investigation into Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll. Acting AG Todd Blanche, who represented Trump, is recused from the case. W/@PaulaReidCNN and @KaraScannell https://t.co/mY1Q7lrT9e — Hannah Rabinowitz (@HBRabinowitz) May 27, 2026 The timing is also important because Carroll’s cases against President Trump are still active on appeal. Her side won huge civil awards, but Trump continues to fight the judgments and has repeatedly called the claims a politically driven hoax. AP recently summarized where the $83 million defamation judgment stands: President Trump does not have to pay the $83 million defamation award to Carroll while the U.S. Supreme Court has a chance to review the case or reject the appeal. The Second Circuit allowed the delay, while requiring Trump to post a $7.4 million bond to cover additional interest costs during the process. The appeals court had already refused to hold a rare full-court rehearing after a three-judge panel affirmed the January 2024 verdict. Trump’s legal team then asked for the award to remain paused while the case moves toward the high court. The broader Carroll litigation includes the earlier May 2023 verdict, when a jury awarded Carroll $5 million after concluding Trump sexually abused her and later defamed her. Trump has denied the allegation, called the claims a “made up scam,” and is still pursuing appellate relief in the long-running fight. The pause on payment keeps the judgment from being collected while the Supreme Court stage plays out. That appeal context makes the new DOJ investigation even more significant because the Carroll litigation remains active, expensive, and politically explosive. For years, the Carroll case was treated by the media as a one-way weapon against Trump. Now the question is whether the funding trail and sworn testimony around that case deserve scrutiny too. If prosecutors find nothing, the matter ends there. If they find that Carroll’s sworn answer was false in a way that matters legally, one of the most celebrated anti-Trump lawsuits in America could become a very different story. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

A former senior CIA official is in federal custody after investigators say they found a staggering haul inside his Virginia home: more than 300 gold bars worth over $40 million, roughly $2 million in cash, and about 35 luxury watches. His name is David Rush, and federal filings say he told the government the gold was for work. Rush, who allegedly held top secret-level security clearance, was arrested last week and charged with criminal theft of public money in the Eastern District of Virginia. An FBI affidavit says Rush requested and received foreign currency and tens of millions of dollars in gold bars for “work-related expenses” between November and March. BREAKING: David Rush, a former senior CIA officer, was busted for having $40 million worth of gold bars stashed in his house that he claims were "work expenses." Rush also reportedly fabricated his college background and his experience at the US Naval Test Pilot School. How… — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) May 27, 2026 Federal agents searched Rush’s home on May 18, and the inventory reads like something out of a movie. More than 300 gold bars. Approximately $2 million in U.S. currency. Around 35 luxury watches were also seized, many of them Rolexes. The FBI is working alongside the CIA and the Department of Justice on the investigation, and Rush’s lawyer declined to comment on Wednesday. The AP laid out the core allegations and seizure details: Federal filings describe Rush as a former senior CIA official with top secret-level clearance who is accused of taking hundreds of gold bars from the federal government and keeping them at his home. The criminal case in Virginia charges him with theft of public money, and the FBI affidavit says the requests for foreign currency and gold bars came over a period of months, from November through March. The search of Rush’s home took place on May 18. Federal officials say they recovered more than 300 gold bars with an estimated value above $40 million, along with roughly $2 million in U.S. currency. Agents also seized about 35 luxury watches, many of them Rolexes. The affidavit says some money or gold tied to the requests was found in a storage space near his office. The FBI affidavit says there is probable cause to believe Rush knowingly converted something of value belonging to the United States for his own use. The FBI said it is working with the CIA and the Justice Department, while Rush’s lawyer declined comment. The gold bars are only part of the story. Court records paint a picture of alleged fraud that goes far beyond the theft charge itself. Investigators say Rush fabricated educational and military credentials to obtain his government position and the extraordinary level of trust that came with it. The affidavit alleges Rush falsely claimed degrees from Clemson University and Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. He also allegedly misrepresented his military and aviation background, including claims tied to the U.S. Naval Test Pilot School. On top of that, prosecutors allege Rush claimed approximately 744 hours of military leave after a 2015 discharge from the Navy Reserve, collecting roughly $77,000 in compensation for leave he was not entitled to take. Patch added the local court-record context: Court records in Alexandria show Rush made an initial appearance before U.S. Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick after his arrest on a federal theft charge. Prosecutors sought detention, and a preliminary and detention hearing was scheduled for Friday at 10 a.m. Rush remained in U.S. Marshals Service custody while the case moved forward. The affidavit described Rush as a former senior executive service-level employee at a U.S. government agency in the Eastern District of Virginia who held top secret and sensitive compartmented information clearance. Investigators allege Rush used false education and military claims on government applications and security paperwork. Those claims were connected to Clemson University, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Navy Reserve service, and aviation training. Government records cited in the case showed he claimed 744 hours of military leave after his discharge in 2015, totaling about $77,000 in compensation. The filing also says Rush requested large amounts of foreign currency and gold bars from his employer for purported work expenses before investigators later found some of the funds could not be accounted for. John Solomon also flagged the arrest and seizure on X: Breaking: FBI arrests former CIA official over $40 million worth of gold bars stashed at Virginia home https://t.co/yjiqJpKYaJ — John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) May 28, 2026 Think about what this case actually means. A man allegedly lied about his education, lied about his military record, moved into one of the most sensitive lanes in the U.S. intelligence community, and then gained access to tens of millions of dollars in government gold. Rush has not entered a plea, and his attorney has not commented publicly. If the allegations hold up, the bigger question reaches beyond David Rush himself. How was a man with fabricated credentials ever given that level of trust and access in the first place? This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.

If you want to know what California Democrats are afraid of, just watch what they rush to protect. Governor Gavin Newsom signed an emergency election bill on May 27, 2026, that took effect immediately as an urgency measure. The timing was not subtle. California’s statewide primary is scheduled for June 2, just six days later. The AP laid out the timing and anti-President Trump purpose behind the California law: Newsom signed the legislation Wednesday, and the urgency measure took effect immediately. The new restrictions landed just days before California’s Tuesday primary, with ballots already being cast in a closely watched statewide race. The law bars people, including federal agents, from accessing voter rolls or election technology without a court order. It also restricts law-enforcement officers from disrupting election workers except in genuine public-safety emergencies. Newsom cast the bill as preparation for possible Trump administration interference in Democratic-led states. Trump administration officials, meanwhile, said there were no plans to send immigration agents to polling places around the country. The backdrop is bigger than one California primary. President Trump’s team has pressed election-integrity fights around voter lists, ballot rules, and federal oversight, while California Democrats are turning those demands into warnings about interference. That is why the timing matters. California did not merely pass a talking-point resolution; it created an immediate legal barrier around election records and systems while voters were already moving through the primary process and local election offices were already handling ballots. The bill blocks access to voter rolls, voting systems, ballots, and other election materials without a court order or other narrow legal basis. It restricts law enforcement from entering polling places, counting rooms, or ballot-handling areas except in genuine public-safety emergencies or under a court order. And it creates criminal penalties for anyone who improperly removes, confiscates, or interferes with ballots, voting machines, or voter rolls. California Senate Democrats described exactly what SB 73 is designed to block: The official legislative release said SB 73 was passed to protect California elections from outside interference and to enforce new safety measures for ballots and polling locations. It said the urgency clause was included so the protections would be available for the June 2 statewide primary. The release said the Attorney General or Secretary of State can stop law enforcement officers, including federal officials, from being posted at voting locations or county elections offices. It also said law enforcement cannot access voting machines or voter rolls without a court order. The same release said removing ballots from the custody of a county registrar becomes a felony. In plain English, California Democrats turned a fight over election scrutiny into a criminal-enforcement framework. That is the heart of the fight. They are building a legal shield around the records and machines voters want opened to more scrutiny, not less. The bill was introduced by Senator Suzette Martinez Valladares and backed by Senate President pro Tempore Mike McGuire. Newsom and his allies framed the whole thing as protection against “federal overreach” by President Trump’s administration. Newsom’s own office announced the move on X with a direct warning to anyone tied to the Trump administration. I just signed a new law to defend our elections… Criminal fines. Up to three years of jail time. — Governor Gavin Newsom (@CAgovernor) May 27, 2026 There is just one problem with that story. Trump administration officials had already said they had no plans to send ICE agents or federal law enforcement to polling places or election offices. No one was planning what California just spent emergency legislative energy to prevent. So what is actually going on here? The answer is painfully obvious. California Democrats are shielding election machinery from the kind of federal scrutiny millions of Americans have demanded for years. President Trump has been pushing election integrity and federal oversight as a cornerstone issue. Voters across the country want to know that voter rolls are accurate, that non-citizens are not on them, and that ballots are handled properly. California’s response to that completely reasonable position was to slam the door shut and add criminal penalties for anyone who tries to open it. Think about what the bill actually does. It does more than stop hypothetical armed raids on polling stations. It walls off voter rolls from federal review. It walls off voting systems and ballots themselves. The SB 73 bill text shows how far California is going to wall off election operations: The bill text adds language saying a peace officer shall not interfere with the administration of an election except as necessary to respond to urgent public-health or safety threats. It also lets the Attorney General, Secretary of State, or a county elections official bring a civil action to enforce that restriction. Another section says no individual may permit a law-enforcement agent to access, disrupt, modify, or take possession of rosters, combined rosters, or voter lists unless authorized by a court order or tied to a specific voting-fraud investigation. The definition of law-enforcement agency expressly includes federal law enforcement. The bill also reaches certified voting technology. It says an individual may not allow a law-enforcement agent to access, disrupt, modify, or take possession of certified voting technology or any portion of it without a court order. That is why this matters beyond one primary date. Once the state treats federal election oversight as a threat, every future demand for clean voter rolls or outside review can be painted as interference. If your election system is clean and your voter rolls are accurate, why would you rush through a law making it a crime for anyone to look? The urgency designation tells you everything. Normal bills go through a full legislative process. Urgency measures bypass the usual timeline and take effect the moment the governor signs them. California Democrats treated federal election transparency like a five-alarm fire that had to be extinguished before voters went to the polls on June 2. This is the same state that has resisted every federal effort to verify citizenship status on voter rolls. The same state that hands out driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants and then acts shocked when anyone asks whether those names end up in voter databases. And now they have made it a crime to find out. Newsom can call it protecting democracy all he wants. But when you criminalize oversight of the very systems voters distrust most, you are not protecting anything except your own political machinery. The real tell is the timing. If this were about principle, California could have passed it months ago through the normal process. Instead they waited until the last possible moment before a primary election and rammed it through on an emergency basis. That is not governance. That is a cover operation with a press release.