by Aaron Gentzler If you voted for Trump… or you’re just skeptical about politics… You know many people are furious. A year-plus into Trump’s second term… We’ve seen ZERO insiders arrested. Not a single deep state crony. Or member of Biden’s team. The question is – why? We just met up with a 50-year Washington insider who has a wild theory on what’s really going on… and what will happen next. “Behind the scenes,” he told us, “the Trump team has been planning a counter-attack unlike anything we’ve seen since the Civil War.” And it won’t just re-shape Washington… He added: “The last time anything like this happened, the stock market lost more than half of its value. And by the time it hits the headlines, it will be too late for most people to prepare.” That’s why we sat him down and got the whole thing on camera — his theory, the counter-attack he says is coming, and what it could mean for your money. We’ve made it free to watch, while there’s still time to react. You can see it for yourself, right here. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!) This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post The Real Reason Trump “Went Easy” On The Deep State – And What’s Coming Next appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

America’s B-1 Lancer has returned to the fight over Iran. U.S. officials say the long-range bomber struck Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps targets on Tuesday after taking off from an air base in Britain. Tehran’s answer was aimed beyond the United States. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards warned that British bases could be hit, putting one of Washington’s closest NATO allies directly in the regime’s sights. President Trump is still weighing how far to take the campaign as Iran keeps threatening commercial shipping and attacking American positions across the region. The latest mission gives him one of the heaviest conventional strike options in the U.S. arsenal. BREAKING: B1 BOMBERS JUST DROPPED 2,000 LB PAYLOADS INTO IRAN… WOAH! Iran just THREATENED to HIT British bases—Good luck! Our F16s are LOCKED AND LOADED EU Diplomats ORDERED TO EVACUATE IRAN… they know SOMETHING Iran BEGS at the table, but TRUMP says NO DEAL.… pic.twitter.com/rgfDvwU0am — Jesse Watters (@JesseBWatters) July 24, 2026 The embedded post describes 2,000-pound payloads being dropped. That specific loadout has not been confirmed by the official or independent reporting available so far. The confirmed facts still mark a serious escalation. According to Axios, U.S. officials confirmed that a B-1 struck IRGC targets on Tuesday. It was the first mission involving that bomber since fighting with Iran resumed 12 days earlier. The aircraft launched from an air base in the United Kingdom and was visible on public aviation websites. Central Command did not identify the B-1 in its statement about Tuesday’s strikes. A B-1 can carry as many as two dozen 2,000-pound bombs or dozens of cruise missiles. It can also fly faster than the speed of sound at low altitude while hauling the largest conventional bomb load of any U.S. bomber. The exact target, weapon load and comparative effect of Tuesday’s mission remain undisclosed. The verified picture is still stark: the B-1 flew, it struck IRGC targets, and it departed from British soil. That combination gives the mission a significance far beyond a single sortie. The B-1 is a heavy bomber built to carry a lot of firepower over a long distance. Launching it from Britain also makes the alliance supporting the operation visible to Tehran. The Iranian regime noticed. Reuters says Britain declared its armed forces ready to defend the country after the IRGC warning over American bombers flying from British bases. The British government’s current Iran advisory shows how sharply the security picture has deteriorated. London says its agreement with Washington permits defensive U.S. operations from British facilities against Iranian missile capabilities used to threaten ships in the Strait of Hormuz. British officials have described that authority as limited and defensive. Britain says the Royal Navy, Army and Royal Air Force are maintaining a layered defense alongside NATO allies. That response puts real military weight behind the message that an attack on British bases would be met by forces already on alert. The official advisory confirms that UK diplomatic staff were temporarily withdrawn from Iran while the embassy shifted to remote operations. It advises against all travel to Iran, but it does not establish the broader evacuation of European Union diplomats described in the embedded post. The distinction sharpens the picture. A NATO ally allowed its runway to support an American strike. Tehran answered by naming that ally’s bases as possible targets. Meanwhile, the air campaign has continued without a pause. Central Command said U.S. forces began another round of strikes at 6:45 p.m. Eastern on Thursday, marking the thirteenth consecutive night of attacks against Iranian military targets. U.S. forces started another night of strikes against Iranian military targets at 6:45 p.m. ET today. This is the 13th consecutive night of strikes aimed to hold Iran accountable and diminish threats from the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps to commercial shipping. — U.S. Central Command (@CENTCOM) July 23, 2026 The stated objective is to reduce the IRGC’s ability to threaten commercial shipping, especially around the Strait of Hormuz. That chokepoint is the pressure point running through the entire fight. Iran has used threats against ships, bases and allied infrastructure to raise the cost of every American move. The B-1 mission answers that pressure with reach. It shows that the United States can launch a heavy bomber from Europe, strike inside Iran and fold the aircraft back into a campaign already operating night after night. Tehran may hope that threatening Britain will fracture the coalition or make London reconsider access to its bases. It could have the opposite effect. Every warning aimed at a NATO country reminds allied capitals that Iran’s strategy reaches well beyond a dispute with Washington. The B-1’s return also gives President Trump another lever as negotiations continue. Iran now has to calculate whether threatening the country that hosted the bomber makes a deal more likely, or brings even more American firepower into play. One detail remains classified: exactly what the bomber carried. Another is already public: where it came from and who Tehran threatened next. The runway was British. The bomber was American. Tehran made sure Britain received the next warning. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post B-1 Bomber Returns To Iran Fight As Tehran Threatens NATO Ally That Opened Its Runway appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Hunter Biden has picked a new enemy inside the same Washington media world that spent years treating scrutiny of the Biden family as partisan noise. During a sprawling interview with Don Lemon, Hunter did far more than criticize CNN anchor Jake Tapper. He unloaded on him, made the feud intensely personal and then challenged one of the stories at the heart of the Democrats’ post-2024 blame game. In the full July 22 episode of The Don Lemon Show, Lemon asked Hunter whether he had been friends with Tapper and what he thought of the anchor’s book. Hunter said he had known Tapper for roughly 25 years, but whatever friendship once existed was clearly gone. What followed was not a polished cable-news answer. Hunter used an obscene insult, called Tapper a “really poor journalist” and said he did not consider him a decent person. Hunter said the grievance was personal and tied it to the way Tapper had spoken about him, his mother and his father. He insisted he would say the same things to Tapper’s face and said he no longer had any reason to perform the usual Washington ritual of pretending to respect someone he plainly despises. The more consequential exchange came later, when Lemon raised claims that Hunter and Jill Biden had pushed former President Joe Biden to stay in the 2024 presidential race. Hunter said he had heard that narrative from Tapper and flatly denied reports that he moved into the White House, planted himself in the Oval Office or pressured his father to keep running. Video from Hunter Biden’s July 22 interview with Don Lemon. — New York Post (@nypost) July 23, 2026 The profanity will draw the clips. The accusation that matters is Hunter’s claim that a prominent journalist helped spread a false story about the Biden family’s role in the failed reelection campaign. That claim needs to be handled carefully. Hunter is not a neutral witness, and he has an obvious personal interest in rejecting any account that assigns him blame for his father’s political collapse. His own answer also contains an important tension. Hunter denied pressuring his father to remain in the race. Yet he acknowledged that he never told him to leave it either. Hunter’s word alone does not prove Tapper’s reporting was wrong. Still, it is a direct challenge from the person Tapper’s narrative reportedly placed near the center of the family pressure campaign. Tapper and Axios reporter Alex Thompson’s Original Sin was published on May 20, 2025. The official publisher description frames the book as an account of Joe Biden’s decline, the effort by people around him to conceal its severity and the disastrous decision to seek another term. The book arrived after voters had already seen the June 2024 debate disaster, watched Democrats force Biden aside and returned President Trump to the White House. That timing fueled a fair question Tapper has never fully escaped: Why did so much of the media’s supposedly explosive truth arrive only after it could no longer help voters make the decision in front of them? Hunter’s attack goes beyond that familiar criticism. He is accusing Tapper of turning a false family narrative into part of the historical record while presenting himself as one of the journalists finally revealing what happened behind closed doors. The interview settles nothing by itself. It does put one of the story’s central figures on camera, under his own name, saying the account was the opposite of the truth and identifying Tapper as one of the people he heard advancing it. The hostility clearly runs both ways. A clip from 2025 resurfaced Thursday showing Tapper delivering his own blistering assessment of Hunter’s ethics, judgment and treatment of his family. A resurfaced 2025 clip shows Jake Tapper delivering his own harsh assessment of Hunter Biden. — Jason Cohen (@JasonJournoDC) July 23, 2026 That footage is not a new Tapper response to Hunter’s interview. It is an older clip reshared Thursday, and it shows the bad blood was already present well before Hunter sat down with Lemon. Tapper’s criticism focused on Hunter’s conduct. Hunter’s counterattack focused on Tapper’s character, his journalism and the lucrative postmortem that followed Joe Biden’s defeat. Neither man deserves automatic credibility. Hunter’s long record of disastrous choices makes him a deeply flawed messenger. Tapper’s late transformation into a chronicler of Biden’s decline has earned its own skepticism from Americans who watched major media figures dismiss or downplay obvious warning signs in real time. That is what makes this exchange more revealing than the profanity. A member of the Biden family is now accusing one of CNN’s biggest names of the very thing conservatives have alleged for years: shaping the story when it was useful, then cashing in on the reckoning after the damage was done. Tapper wanted to write the definitive account of how the Biden presidency unraveled. Hunter just put Tapper inside that story and accused him of helping create one of its most damaging claims. Their old relationship is over. The fight over who gets to write the history of the Biden collapse is just getting started. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post Hunter Biden Unloads On CNN’s Jake Tapper — Then Calls Out The Story He Says Was A Lie appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

Religious liberty is not supposed to disappear the moment an American enters a federal office, applies for a grant or deals with a government regulator. President Trump’s Justice Department just issued a government-wide reminder: faith is not a private hobby that bureaucrats may tolerate only when convenient. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche released sweeping updated guidance Thursday directing every executive department and agency to account for religious liberty in federal employment, contracting, grants, rulemaking and enforcement. It is the first major rewrite of the department’s religious-liberty guidance since 2017. That alone makes this bigger than a routine legal memo. The rules Washington agencies write can reach a worker’s schedule, a ministry’s eligibility for public funds, a parent’s authority and even a church’s internal decisions. Blanche is telling the executive branch that the Constitution still applies in every one of those places. IN GOD WE TRUST: President Trump's Department of Justice expands religious liberty protections across the federal government, directing all executive agencies to give greater weight to faith-based rights when writing regulations, enforcing law, and accommodating employees'… pic.twitter.com/c7TGr7pE5W — Fox News Politics (@foxnewspolitics) July 23, 2026 The Justice Department said the memorandum incorporates nine years of Supreme Court decisions and requires agencies to comply with the First Amendment, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and other federal protections. The department stressed that religious exercise includes daily conduct as well as private belief and formal worship. Under the new framework, agencies must consider religious-liberty consequences while policies are still being developed. They are instructed to appoint officers who can review regulatory proposals, examine enforcement plans and raise compliance concerns before a federal action is finalized. The guidance also requires agencies to take religious-liberty objections seriously when citizens submit them during public comment periods. In the federal workplace, it points officials toward lawful accommodations involving schedules, religious expression and other practices that can come into conflict with an employee’s duties. Religious organizations receive their own protections. Agencies may not force a ministry to surrender its religious character or lawful hiring rights as the price of participating in a federal program, and faith-based groups must be allowed to compete for grants and contracts on equal footing with secular organizations. The memo reaches two other areas where government pressure can become deeply personal. It reaffirms that parents have a constitutional interest in directing the religious upbringing of their children. It also warns agencies against interfering with church autonomy, including a religious body’s control over internal governance and certain employment decisions. Those are not abstract disputes for the people caught inside them. A denied accommodation can cost someone a job. A biased grant rule can shut a faith-based charity out of a program. Government intrusion into a church’s leadership can strike at the institution’s ability to remain a church at all. The most important change may be one of timing. Too often, religious liberty becomes a federal concern only after a citizen has hired a lawyer and spent years fighting an agency in court. This guidance orders agencies to ask the constitutional question before they impose the burden. Fox News reported that the update draws on major Supreme Court victories that changed how officials must evaluate religious exercise. One is Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, where the Court protected a public high school football coach who prayed after games. Another is Groff v. DeJoy, a workplace-accommodation case involving a Christian postal employee who sought Sundays off. The Court rejected the weak standard many employers had used to deny religious accommodations and required them to show a substantial burden in the overall context of their business. First Liberty Institute President Kelly Shackelford said the new guidance should help ensure that the federal government respects religious-liberty rights while carrying out President Trump’s policies. His organization was involved in both of those Supreme Court cases. Together, the rulings make the government’s obligation harder to evade. Officials cannot treat religious expression as presumptively suspicious, and employers cannot deny an accommodation simply because honoring it would create a minor inconvenience. The response from religious-liberty advocates came quickly. Today, the DOJ announced the release of updated guidance on federal protections for religious liberty. We are grateful for this administrations’ commitment to safeguarding the constitutional rights of religious individuals and organizations.https://t.co/MsSYx2LjVd — Concerned Women for America LAC (@CWforA) July 23, 2026 A guidance document is not a magic wand. It will not eliminate every dispute, and it does not guarantee that every requested accommodation must be granted. The law still allows the government to defend a genuine compelling interest and employers to reject accommodations that create a substantial hardship. But the default posture matters. Federal officials are now being instructed to look for ways to protect religious exercise, not reasons to dismiss it. That standard applies to people of every faith. It protects the popular belief and the unpopular one, the large denomination and the small congregation, the federal employee and the ministry seeking to serve its community. Blanche put the principle plainly: Americans must be free to live out their faith in daily life, including when they interact with their own government. For years, too many officials treated religious liberty as something that belonged inside a home or house of worship and nowhere else. The First Amendment never said that. Now the Justice Department is putting the entire executive branch on notice. The federal government works under the Constitution. The Constitution does not work around the convenience of federal bureaucrats. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post DOJ Just Put Federal Agencies On Notice Over Religious Liberty appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.

by Aaron Gentzler You remember the summer of 2020. Boarded-up storefronts. City blocks burning on the evening news. Police precincts overrun. All told… America saw $2 billion in damage. With at least 19 people dead. CNN called it “fiery but peaceful protests.” But Jim Rickards — a former advisor to the CIA, Pentagon, and four White House administrations — remembers it differently. He says these riots were engineered. And the same machine is firing up again right now — aimed squarely at Donald Trump. Only this time, he says, it’s far worse. “America is facing a Mid-Term Meltdown unlike any we’ve seen before.” And the damage won’t stop at boarded-up storefronts — it could reach the retirement account you’ve spent your whole life building. He laid the whole thing out on camera — who’s driving it, what they’re really after, and the moves he’s making to protect his own family before it breaks. You can watch it, free of charge, right here. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!) This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post The People Who Burned Cities to Beat Trump are Back and They’re FURIOUS appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.