There are only so many ways Democrats can spell out, in the most explicit possible terms, what they plan to do if and when they retake control of the federal government. They’ve spent the last year celebrating the murder of conservatives, raising hell over the most basic voter-ID laws imaginable, and most recently, sabotaging the nation’s airports in order to prevent ICE from doing its job — a plan that may very well work, given that Republicans seem interested in caving at the moment, once again. In short, Democrats are preparing a government that would treat Americans as foreigners in their own country. But just in case their plan somehow wasn’t obvious, here’s Senator Chris Murphy, the Democrat from Connecticut, to spell it out.  Listen carefully to his answer here: Senator Chris Murphy: “The people we care about most, the undocumented migrants” He actually said that pic.twitter.com/FsEPmWs81U — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) March 24, 2026 Source: MS NOW/EndWokeness/X.com It’s the “undocumented Americans” that Democrats “care about most,” according to Chris Murphy. Yes, “undocumented Americans.” Simply by virtue of entering this country — illegally, in almost every case — these people become Americans, according to one of the leaders of the Democrat Party. And more than that — they become the most important Americans of all. Democrats will prioritize their interests over the interests of you and your family. And they won’t even pretend otherwise. That interview aired in the final months of Joe Biden’s presidency. It’s only recently surfaced on social media, and for good reason. Democrats are now clearly preparing to wage an all-out war on Americans if they retake Congress and the White House. They’re planning a campaign of retribution against conservatives that will make the Biden years look tame by comparison. This isn’t a guess. They’re saying it openly, in a variety of different contexts. In some cases, they’re rewriting history to justify the purge that they’re planning. Now, it probably won’t come as a surprise to anyone to hear that I believe it’s very important to study history — not the propaganda you’re taught in public schools, but actual history. We talk about various historical topics on the show all the time. I also have another monthly show, “Real History,” on Daily Wire. And there are a few reasons for this. First of all, it’s interesting, as a factual matter. Secondly, as the famous quote goes, “those who are ignorant of history are doomed to repeat it.” On top of that, if you’re familiar with American history, then it’s easier to spot political propaganda, particularly from the Left — which has committed itself to rewriting the past. It’s also easier to see through this propaganda and determine what the Left is really after. So here’s a very transparent example of what this means, in practice. Late last week, The New Republic — which is one of those outlets on the Left that claims to be highly intellectual, like the Atlantic — outlined an elaborate plan to harass and imprison Donald Trump and his advisers, once Trump leaves office. This is the Left’s new-and-improved game plan for a new wave of lawfare against Donald Trump. Instead of talking about ways to improve the lives of American citizens, they’re still fixated on retribution. The article is entitled, “There Will Be No Post-Presidential Peace for Donald Trump.” For the most part, the article feels like it could’ve been written ten years ago, except for the fact that it drops the whole Russian collusion hoax, which is too embarrassing for Democrats to talk about anymore. (That’s why no one on the left mourned Robert Mueller, by the way; he was their hero when they thought he was useful to them, but when he failed to take down Trump, they completely forgot he existed). But the author of the New Republic article does mention the infamous “Emoluments Clause,” which used to be all the rage on the Left, as you may remember. He also drones on about “international law” as if it’s a real thing. He suggests that government attorneys should be disbarred if they worked for the Trump administration. And there’s even the suggestion that ICE officers should be punished in a future administration, for the crime of doing their jobs. But the best paragraph of all, for my money, is this one. Again, this was published in The New Republic, which is allegedly an award-winning magazine on the Left. A rundown of the Trump administration’s scandals and crimes resembles, with shocking likeness, the grave, sweeping charges laid out in the Declaration of Independence against the last American king. “He has excited domestic insurrections against us,” the Founding Fathers wrote about George III in 1776. Is there any better way of describing Trump’s actions on January 6, 2021? He supported a violent mob aiming to overthrow the government; he maintains a similar disrespect for the institutions of American democracy to this day. If you have no familiarity with American history, then this paragraph might make some degree of sense. After all, the Declaration of Independence condemned the British King for causing “domestic insurrections.” And according to The New Republic, Donald Trump basically committed an insurrection as well because he delivered a speech. Therefore, we can conclude that the Founders themselves would have endorsed a campaign of violent payback against the Trump administration. The main problem with this argument becomes very clear when you take a look at what the Founders were talking about when they referred to “domestic insurrections.” Contrary to what modern Leftists believe, the Founders were not attacking King George for delivering a speech to his followers, in which he urged his followers to “peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard.” Instead, the Founders were attacking King George — and other British officials — for encouraging slave revolts in the colonies. In particular, the colonists were furious over Lord Dunmore’s Proclamation in 1775, which was issued by the British officer as the colonists were becoming increasingly frustrated with British rule. Lord Dunmore declared martial law and promised freedom to every slave (or indentured servant) who ran away from his owner and joined the British Army. By some estimates, thousands of slaves took Dunmore up on that offer. It was, in the literal sense, a domestic insurrection. It was nothing like what Donald Trump did on January 6. So take a moment to appreciate the irony here. In order to construct an extremely convoluted plan to “get Donald Trump,” the so-called “thought leaders” on the Left are now taking the side of the American colonists who were upset that the British government was encouraging slaves to run away and become free. Put another way, in order to “defeat the MAGA movement” once and for all, they’re saying that Donald Trump’s actions on January 6 are the moral and legal equivalent of telling black slaves that they should run away and become free. But they don’t actually realize they’re saying any of this, because they don’t understand American history. They certainly don’t care about what the Founders said or what they believed. Their only objective, as always, is to destroy their political opponents. And they will lie about anything in order to achieve that objective. If you spend any amount of time studying history, it becomes very obvious that they do this all the time. And if your children are in public schools, the same thing is happening there. What we’re witnessing here is the launch of what Democrats are calling “Project 2029,” after the infamous Project 2025 that became an instant obsession on the Left.  But there’s a big difference between Project 2025 and Project 2029. The former was a policy document from a conservative think tank, which discussed plans to roll back taxes, promote the nuclear family, and eliminate propaganda from public schools. Democrats pretended that Project 2025 was our nefarious plan to do horrible things to them, but it was actually a pretty standard document. By contrast, Project 2029 is explicitly a plan to imprison and bankrupt Donald Trump and everyone who works for him (or supports him). So once again, Democrats were projecting, in other words. They’re doing exactly what they claimed that the Right was doing. Here’s the governor of Illinois, who’s now on Ozempic, apparently, to explain: Democratic Illinois Governor JB Pritzker speaks about a Democratic “Project 2029” in which members of the current Trump administration, along with federal agents, will be criminally and civilly prosecuted. “Whatever it is that we can do. It may be that you cannot criminally… pic.twitter.com/0bj1dVyUyf — AF Post (@AFpost) March 19, 2026 Source: @AFpost/X.com The New York Times woman with the tie is eager to hear that federal agents will be “criminally prosecuted” — for what, exactly? They don’t say. When the Russiagate hoax was in full swing, they at least had some kind of fake criminal charges in mind — like “obstruction of justice” or something like that. But now they don’t even have that.  Think about how extraordinary that is. These people spent several years talking about prosecuting Donald Trump during his first term. Then Trump left office, and they followed through on their threats. They began several prosecutions against the former president in state and federal court. They didn’t spend any amount of time thinking about what voters actually wanted, or how Donald Trump resonated with so many people. Instead, they spent all of their creative energy bringing charges that made absolutely no sense — to the point that, when Donald Trump was convicted in New York, no sane person in the country even pretended to care. No matter how many times Kamala Harris read the script about Donald Trump being a “convicted felon,” it didn’t matter. And now, after all of that — after losing the presidency in large part because of their lawfare — they’re not simply doubling down. They’re openly admitting that, in their next campaign of retribution, they aren’t even going to use a pretext. They’re just going to throw people in prison — or worse. About a year ago, I did a monologue on the rise of assassination culture in this country. We talked about how Democrats were trying to murder Elon Musk, how they celebrated the murder of a healthcare insurance CEO and glorified his killer, and how they threw money at a black teenager who was accused of murdering a white high school student at a track meet. Charlie Kirk also talked about assassination culture on his show, back in April of 2025. In particular, Charlie cited a report from the Network Contagion Research Institute, or NCRI. They’re a nonprofit based in New Jersey that focuses on analyzing threats on social media. And their report showed that, on the Left, a growing number of people weren’t simply celebrating political violence. They were openly calling for it. That’s why, according to U.S. Capitol Police data, threat investigations have more than doubled since 2017, from 4,000 per year to more than 9,400. (Of course, you don’t really need a report for this — we all know it’s true.) Now, one year later, NCRI has updated its report. They ran a survey where they asked about 2,000 people to first provide their political ideology, and then to state whether they saw a justification for violence against certain political figures. NCRI then filtered out about 1,000 of those respondents because they finished the survey too quickly or failed various attention checks. (Which should tell you something about how unreliable polls tend to be.) Here’s what they’ve found:  Justification for the murder of Donald Trump has increased from NCRI’s original study in April 2025, from 56% to 67% among Left-of-Center respondents. … This tolerance for violence appears to have grown on the right as well, with 54% of Right-of-Center respondents expressing justification for murdering New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. … Support for political murder is associated with pessimistic assessments of America’s trajectory. … Support for political murder is about 15% higher among females than among males. … Overall, nearly two-thirds of all respondents (66%) endorsed some level of justification for murdering either or both Zohran Mamdani and Donald Trump. … The broader pattern points to belief in American decline amplified by social media especially among youth as a central driver of this change. Here’s the data on the people who want Trump dead, to give you an idea. Source: Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) According to the chart, 67% of “left-of-center” respondents gave “some or more justification for murdering Donald Trump.” 58% of “centrists” did the same. And incredibly enough, 42% of “right-of-center” respondents gave a justification for killing Trump. The survey also found a strong correlation between justifying Trump’s murder and Mamdani’s murder, indicating a broader trend towards political violence in this country — one that’s noticeably stronger on the Left, particularly among women who spend a lot of time on social media, and who perceive that America is on the decline. It’s mostly what you’d expect — except perhaps for the fact that women are actually more likely than men to call for political violence. This is a finding that, if true, would obviously represent a major victory for the feminist movement. For generations, they’ve sought to erase every feminine instinct and to replace those instincts with a crude knock-off of masculinity. And that appears to be what’s happening. Women are now posting on social media and giving interviews in which they beat their chests about how bloodthirsty they are. It’s almost as if feminism has made women much less happy and much less pleasant than they’ve ever been at any other point in American history. Watch: POLITICAL VIOLENCE: This is where the Democrats and their willing accomplices in the drive-by media have led their constituents. The bloodlust is palpable. https://t.co/uAepEC5yzx — @amuse (@amuse) September 29, 2025 Source: @amuse/X.com While several of the women in that clip obviously skew older, this trend isn’t limited to the elderly. It’s not simply a phenomenon in which old people are mouthing off. YouGov ran a similar survey, just two days after Charlie Kirk’s murder. They asked, “Is it ever justified for citizens to resort to violence in order to achieve political goals?” Here’s what they found: Source: YouGov/The Economist Nearly one-third of self-described liberals, ages 18 to 39, answered yes. That’s the highest of all the demographics they surveyed. And again, you don’t really need a survey to establish this. You can just browse TikTok and look at videos like this one, with millions of views: Unhinged tiktoker says he’s declaring war on Republicans and Republicans deserve to be shot and die pic.twitter.com/0UNvSRHQHZ — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) January 21, 2025 Source: @libsoftiktok/X.com In one significant way, it’s reminiscent of the effort to ban Alex Jones from every social media platform, including YouTube, Apple, Facebook, Spotify, and Twitter. Back then, we were told that Alex Jones was an exception to the rule — and that Democrats wouldn’t try to ban everyone else they disagreed with. NPR reported that “the ideas that Jones shares are particularly noxious.” Guess what? Within three years, they all banned the president of the United States, as well as thousands of his followers. Political violence works the same way. Once Democrats believe they’re justified in killing one person for political reasons, the floodgates open. They’re not going to stop with Brian Thompson or Charlie Kirk or Donald Trump. With each assassination (or assassination attempt), they grow more and more committed. They will expand their efforts to murder their opponents until they have no opponents left or until someone stops them. There will be no “return to normalcy.” They want you dead. Justifiably, we spend a lot of time on this show criticizing Republicans — particularly Republicans who aren’t advancing basic legislation like the SAVE Act, which needs to pass if we want to have fair elections in this country. It’s not an overstatement to say that many Republicans would rather do absolutely nothing and lose control of Congress in November than undertake the difficult but necessary work of passing legislation. But at the same time, from a purely practical perspective, politicians who do nothing for you are still better than politicians committed to destroying your life and the lives of everyone you care about. And in America, according to every indication we have at the moment, those are your choices right now. Democrats have decided that, in lieu of appealing to the interests of American voters, they’re going to import foreigners who are beholden to the Democrat Party, and then begin a violent crackdown against anyone who disagrees with them. That’s their agenda for 2029. They’re making it very clear. They’re no longer going to pretend to care about “appealing to Americans,” or democracy, or any of that. Instead, they’re going to appeal to “undocumented Americans,” which is to say, foreign invaders who aren’t American at all. Democrats want to punish you, steal from you, and put you in prison, all for the benefit of foreigners who will vote Democrat in every election. And it would be a fatal mistake — in the sense that it could result in the end of Western civilization — for us to assume that these people will be as passive as the FBI was, after the murder of Charlie Kirk. They won’t be. They will be ruthless. And for that reason alone, they must never be allowed to hold power again.