Spencer Pratt says he has the receipts. After weeks of questions surrounding Los Angeles’ slow-moving mayoral count, the former candidate is now making a specific and explosive claim: his own team went into Skid Row, interviewed residents, and gathered video testimony from people who allegedly said they were paid in connection with their votes. That is a very different allegation from a suspicious screenshot or an anonymous rumor. Pratt released the nearly ten-minute video with a blunt message: I didn’t get cheated. You did. pic.twitter.com/ihDoZeEh9J — Spencer Pratt (@spencerpratt) July 9, 2026 In the video, Pratt said the fight is bigger than his failed bid to reach the November runoff. Pratt said there was “tons of evidence” and added, “I was the one who got it.” Pratt said “well-connected people” warned his team about what was allegedly happening on Skid Row, so he sent people there to investigate. He claimed the resulting videos showed homeless residents admitting they had been paid for their votes. Those are Pratt’s allegations. They have not been proven in court, and the public video does not include the ballot records, identities, or chain-of-custody documentation that would establish how many votes, if any, were illegally cast or counted. But this is no longer just an anonymous claim ricocheting around the internet. A named candidate is saying he commissioned the interviews, knows where the videos came from, and possesses the underlying evidence. The video landed only two days after Pratt met with President Trump in the Oval Office. A separate post circulated Pratt’s central accusations in text alongside the full video: HOLY CRAP! Spencer Pratt just dropped this banger on communist election fraud, declaring OPEN WAR and saying he has EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD "The right way isn't easy — but it ends with COMMIE ANIMALS in HANDCUFFS." "I will restore faith in our elections if it's the last… — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) July 9, 2026 There is already a confirmed federal election case involving cash payments and voter registrations on Skid Row. The United States Department of Justice announced in May that Brenda Lee Brown Armstrong had been charged with paying people, including homeless residents of Skid Row, to register to vote. DOJ said Armstrong agreed to plead guilty to a felony carrying a maximum sentence of five years. According to the plea agreement summarized by DOJ, Armstrong worked as a petition circulator and was paid for signatures from registered voters. Prosecutors said she regularly offered people on Skid Row between $2 and $3 to sign petitions, then began paying unregistered people to complete voter-registration forms so their signatures would qualify. DOJ said Armstrong sometimes supplied homeless registrants with her own former address when they had no address to list. Because California automatically mails ballots to registered voters, prosecutors said that created the potential for ballots in those people’s names to be delivered to an address where they did not live or receive mail. The FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigated that case. The distinction matters: Armstrong’s federal case concerns paying people to register and sign petitions. It does not prove Pratt’s newer claim that people were paid to vote for Mayor Karen Bass or Councilwoman Nithya Raman. Still, it establishes something election officials cannot simply wave away. Cash payments, questionable registration addresses, and automatic mail ballots have already produced a federal felony case in the exact neighborhood Pratt’s team targeted. Federal authorities had also confirmed broader investigative work before Pratt released his new video. ABC News reported that Essayli said his office had multiple election-fraud investigations underway in coordination with the FBI’s Los Angeles field office. Essayli also said federal officials were working with Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon on a comprehensive audit of California’s voter rolls. He promised prosecutors would follow the evidence wherever it led and pursue violations of federal election law. The announcement did not identify the subjects of those investigations, and it did not say the Los Angeles mayoral result had been proven fraudulent. That makes Pratt’s raw material important: names, unedited footage, dates, locations, and supporting records could turn a public accusation into evidence investigators can test. The official margin must also be confronted honestly. The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk certified the June 2 primary results on June 26. Mayor Karen Bass finished first with 292,593 votes, Nithya Raman placed second with 247,781, and Pratt finished third with 217,977. The county reported processing 2,227,461 ballots across all contests, with 37.81 percent of eligible voters participating. Vote-by-mail ballots accounted for 1,822,019 of those ballots, or 81.8 percent, while 405,442 were cast at vote centers. Election officials said June 26 was the first day counties were permitted to certify under the timetable set by California law. The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors was then scheduled to formally declare the election concluded on June 30. That left Pratt 29,804 votes short of the second runoff position. A handful of disturbing interviews could justify subpoenas, document checks, and a serious criminal investigation. They do not, by themselves, prove that nearly 30,000 unlawful ballots changed the outcome. Burying the footage would be reckless. Investigators should preserve every original file, identify every witness, compare statements against registration and ballot records where the law permits, and make the findings public. Pratt has now put his own name behind a concrete claim: his team gathered the videos, and he says there is more evidence. If people were paid to surrender ballots or vote for a chosen candidate, then arrests and prosecutions are exactly where this should end. If the evidence shows something else, the public deserves that finding too. Either way, “trust us” is not enough. Election confidence is restored when evidence is examined in daylight, guilty actors are prosecuted, and every lawful vote is protected. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here. The post JUST IN: Spencer Pratt Says He Has EVIDENCE Of Voter Fraud appeared first on 100PercentFedUp.com.