A Stunning Admission Comes from [Facebook/Meta’s] Legal Defense in a Defamation Suit.

Excerpts - "The suit had an incredibly fascinating reveal, nonetheless. In referring to its frequent use of “fact-checker” labels on posts, the conglomerate stated in its motion for dismissal, “The [fact-check] labels themselves are neither false nor defamatory; to the contrary, they constitute protected opinion.”

"Stossel responded with the proper incredulity: “Wait — Facebook’s fact-checks are just ‘opinion’?! I thought fact-checks are statements of fact.”

???????

¥

https://patriotpost.us/article....s/84910-facebook-fac

Michael Swartz: Facebook 'Fact-Checkers' Are Now 'Protected Opinion' | The Patriot Post
Favicon 
patriotpost.us

Michael Swartz: Facebook 'Fact-Checkers' Are Now 'Protected Opinion' | The Patriot Post

A stunning admission comes from the company's legal defense in a defamation suit.