What dictates the value of a game‚ and at what point does a game slip from ‘great value’ to ‘bad value?’ Does a mediocre but padded-out open-world game that takes 100 hours to complete really represent better value than‚ say‚ a 17-hour game for the same price? By that token‚ even the greatest horror games would always have a value disadvantage against open-world games of the same quality: The Witcher 3 will always be better ‘value’ than clearly brilliant horror games Alan Wake 2‚ or Alien: Isolation‚ and that seems like a flawed logic‚ doesn’t it?