Part2
The police authority allowed itself to be humiliated
During the Muslim weekend riots, the police have not only failed in general or retreated in an orderly manner. The religious-political extremists have been allowed to humiliate the Police Authority and indirectly Swedish democracy and the Swedish people.

In no other way can it be described when the police hand over their radio cars and picket buses to the perpetrators who then have to parade undisturbed around in them, wearing uniforms with police emblems that they found in the vehicles and then finish by setting the cars on fire.

Reverse use of the epithet "extremist"
In the media coverage of the Muslim riots, Paludan has been called a "right-wing extremist" because he burns Korans and his political motives have been highlighted and questioned. The Muslim rioters who burn police cars, on the other hand, have escaped such an epithet and also all the critical examination of their religious-political motives and how to legitimize their use of force.

This despite the fact that it is fully permitted right up to the constitution to burn a book (provided it is one's own) but a serious crime to burn a police vehicle. Since the motive for the car burning is religiously political, one can ask which opinions are most extreme and take on the most extreme expressions - those of the Paludans or the pro-violence Muslims.

However, this question is not asked in the newsrooms when reporting on the events of the Easter weekend. Even SVT and SR, which have a requirement to be objective and impartial and in addition a special democracy clause to follow, turn the reality upside down with the narrative that it is actually fundamentalist Islam that is normal and Swedish constitution and democracy that is extreme. In an article , state television describes it as "controversial" to stand up for Swedish democracy and freedom against Muslim dictatorship and theocracy

Civil liberties and rights as showbread
The attitude that freedom of speech, opinion and assembly is fine to have on paper but should not be used in reality if it irritates Muslims is not only with the journalist corps but also with many politicians. Even if they do not sanction the acts of violence per se, they see as a solution to how to deal with the violence to meet the pro-violence Muslims in their demands that promote democracy.

An example is the Social Democratic Member of Parliament Ola Möller. In a post on Facebook , due to the events of the Easter weekend, he demands changes in the law and expanded interpretations of the law that make it a crime to burn Korans or otherwise irritate Muslims. " That a Danish right-wing extremist is allowed to cause problems and bastards in Sweden is hell ," he writes.

SVT Nyheter wears in the same narrative when they highlight the Arab immigrant Ali Hussein, living in Örebro, saying " He who came from Denmark should not cause chaos in Sweden, it is wrong ". Of course, neither the Social Democrats nor state television dare to suggest that it is wrong to come to Sweden as an asylum immigrant and "cause chaos", despite the fact that in this context it is the more relevant reaction.

Scary democracy of the governing party
Among Möller's proposals is a further extension of the law on incitement against ethnic groups, which has already been criticized for slippage. According to the Social Democrat member of parliament, it should also be possible to restrict civil liberties and rights with a freer interpretation of legal space such as incitement and attempts at various types of crime, annoying behavior and more.

That Paludan is forced to wear a helmet and safety vest at his demonstrations in order to protect himself against Muslim violence, Möller sees as proof that what Paludan is doing should be impermissible. It is frightening to realize that a person who reasons so backwards and has such an inverted view of who is the perpetrator and victim of crime is actually sitting in the Swedish Parliament as a representative of the country's largest and ruling party.

Even more frightening is the realization that he is not something unique. Even Minister of Justice Morgan Johansson (S) says in an interview with TV4 that Paludan is the one who is a "thug" in the context and who bears the blame for the hatred and violence. Like SVT, TV4's news anchors are pulling their weight by questioning whether in the future permission should really be given for demonstrations that risk irritating Muslims.