Mamdani Victory Party Was Lit

Mamdani's victory party stirred controversy with its totalitarian themes and socialist rhetoric.

Well, for a guy who PolitiFact assured us was not a communist, Mamdani sure knows how to start a victory speech...

Advertisement

Mamdani's is exactly what you think he is: an antisemitic cultural Marxist whose entire worldview is driven by Critical Theory and intersectional politics. He hates America, or at least the America that you and I grew up in and which made him one of the wealthiest and most privileged people in the world, and is fully committed to replacing the current population with one that is dominated by a third-world mentality. 

That's not the opinion of somebody who has become poisoned by a fever dream and a commitment to white nationalism. It's exactly what he says himself. 

His speech was filled with totalitarian language. "No problem too small for government to care about?" Really? His vision of "freedom" is geared toward "free," at least for those in his preferred constituency. During the campaign, he explained that his plan was to raise taxes on white people—yes, he said that explicitly—and he made clear during his victory speech that to a great extent the goal was for the people he calls "oppressed" to get revenge on those who are their "oppressors." 

Advertisement

He doesn't talk about climbing the ladder; his rhetoric is about storming the castle and looting it. 

His victory party was filled with people ecstatic about doing just that. There is a whole list of people whom Mamdani and they want to, at least metaphorically, be first up against the wall. Of course, this being America and New York City in particular, where the mayor has enormous powers over some matters and hardly any over others, he will be more a supercharged Bill de Blasio than a Fidel Castro who can actually fulfill some of the promises he made. 

I am looking forward to the analysis of just what he can and cannot do, and the extent to which he can implement his agenda. "Seizing the means of production" is unlikely to be in the cards, but regulating and taxing them to death will be sufficient in the long run to hobble the city. 

Jewish New Yorkers do have a lot to fear. New York City is the largest Jewish city in the world by population, although the Tel Aviv metropolitan region holds more Jews than the New York City metro. New York City has already become hostile to Jews, especially Orthodox Jews, whom the government hounded during COVID and beyond.  

Advertisement

While Jay Jones' victory said more about where the Democratic Party is than Mamdani's—New York City has been a stronghold for luxury communist beliefs for a century—Mamdani's will have a longer-lasting impact on the country and the Democratic Party than Jones'. Jones' victory is scarier for Republicans than Mamdani's because it tells us about the soul of the Democratic Party voter and their willingness to embrace violence; Mamdani's victory shows, as AOC pointed out, that the old Democratic Party establishment is on the way out. 

Few people are talking about what it means yet, but Nancy Pelosi is about to be replaced by Scott Weiner, who is a moral degenerate deeply committed to destroying the moral foundation of this country. He has worked diligently—and successfully, in California—to normalize adult-child sexual relations, human trafficking, and prostitution. He is one side of the new face of the Democratic Party, with Mamdani being the other. 

Advertisement

Ironically, Mamdani, AOC, and Scott Weiner talk an awful lot about the working class, but their electoral base is young, disaffected voters who have a great deal of education and no discernible skills. The working class is not attracted to their version of liberalism or socialism, which graduate students in gender studies are over the moon. 

A lot of the more establishment Democrats were hoping that Mamdani was playing up his socialism for his base and would accommodate himself to the reality of being mayor of the world financial center that serves as the financial heartbeat of the world's economy. 

"I think he missed an opportunity. I think the Mamdani that we saw in the campaign trail, who was a lot more calm, who was a lot warmer, who was a lot more embracing, was not present in that speech. And I think that Mamdani is the one you need to hear from tonight. There are a lot of people trying to figure out, can I get on this train with him or not? Is he going to include me? Is he going -- is he -- is he going to be more of a class warrior even in office? I think he missed a chance tonight to to open up and bring more people into the tent. I think his tone was sharp. I think he was using the microphone in a way that he was almost yelling. And that's not the Mamdani that we've seen on Tiktok and the great interviews and stuff like that."

"So, I felt like it was a little bit of a character switch here, where the warm, open, embracing guy that's close to working people was not on stage tonight. And there were some some other voice on stage. That said, he's very young. And he just pulled off something very, very difficult. And I wouldn't write him off, but I think he missed an opportunity to open himself up tonight. And I think that that will probably cost him going forward."

Advertisement

Newsflash: he really is a communist. He will move left, not right. 

Scott Jennings, not Van Jones, understands where Mamdani really is. Jones really is a moderate Democrat in the mid-90s Clinton mold, and the party has definitely left him behind. 

WATCH: @ScottJenningsKY unloads on Zohran Mamdani's long, angry victory speech:

Oh, are you saying he didn't -- he wasn't the unifying voice of a generation that you predicted mere moments ago. Axe, where was the -- where was the man that you predicted would not slice and dice the -- guys, he started his speech by quoting Eugene Debs, who ran for president of the United States five times as the Socialist Party of America candidate. He repeatedly attacked people in this -- no, I know my socialists. I keep a close eye on them."

"So, here's the thing. He went after everybody that he thinks is a problem: people who own things, people who have businesses. He said an interesting quote: 'No problem too large for government to solve.' And so, when you think of the world that way, that every problem, no matter how small or how large, is something for government to do, let me just decipher this for you. Tax increases as far as the eye can see, which means that people who need to provide jobs to the young people that you say need jobs are going to flee as quickly as they possibly can."

"I think this was a divisive speech, and he clearly sees the world in terms of the people who are oppressing you and the oppressed. And he said, the oppressed are now in City Hall."

Advertisement

If you hope or worry that Mamdani will be able to go full communist, he can't. But what he can do is empower people like Hasan Piker and his ilk, use government funding to bolster nonprofits that will fan across the city, and use that strategy of termites rather than elephants to bring down the wooden pillars holding the city up. 

America doesn't have a good mechanism for revolutionary change, which is why the communists adopted the "long march through the institutions." They already succeeded in taking down America's "second city" in Chicago, and just took over its first. 

Ironically, one of the happiest men out there is a billionaire who has helped fund the termite revolution. 


Editor’s Note
: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.

Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.


David Strom

334 Blog posts

Comments