Keir Starmer and NHS Promoting First Cousin Marriages for Muslims

A debate on first-cousin marriages in the UK amidst health risks and cultural sensitivities.

There is a movement to ban first-cousin marriages in the UK, following the recent bans in Sweden in Norway. 

Most Western countries have, until recently, not bothered to ban the practice because it is vanishingly rare, although most US states ban it. The reasoning is simple: first cousin marriages present similar health risks to incest, dramatically increasing the chances of birth defects and intellectual retardation. And cousin marriages are highly correlated, in certain cultures, with sexual coercion. In the UK, 4% of infant deaths are caused by birth defects stemming from first-cousin marriages—about three times the rate of deaths from substance abuse. 

Advertisement

Despite the obvious health issues associated with the practice, the National Health Service, as a sign of support for the Muslim community, published a report on the benefits of first-cousin marriages. I kid you not. 

The NHS has been urged to apologise for publishing an article extolling the benefits of first-cousin marriage despite the increased risk of birth defects.

The article published last week by the NHS England’s Genomics Education Programme says first-cousin marriage is linked to “stronger extended family support systems and economic advantages”.

But the practice has also been linked to oppression of women and also has a proven increased risk of genetic disease in offspring of first-cousin relationships.

Richard Holden, the Tory MP, told the Mail On Sunday: “Our NHS should stop taking the knee to damaging and oppressive cultural practices.

“The Conservatives want to see an end to cousin marriage as a backdoor to immigration too, but Labour are deaf to these sensible demands.

“Sir Keir Starmer should stop running scared of the misogynistic community controllers and their quislings who appear in the form of cultural relativist-obsessed sociology professors, and ban a practice the overwhelming majority, from every community in Britain, want to see ended for good.”

Yes, you read that right. The NHS admits that first-cousin marriage is terrible for health, but should be praised because it is good for "extended family support and economic advantages." I guess that is why the British Muslim community is so culturally healthy. Can we get a similar explanation for why child marriage is good for the economic viability of the families who sell their daughters to wealthy men? 

Advertisement

Sweden and Norway passed their laws to address the skyrocketing problems associated with the common practice of first-cousin marriages, which, among other things, is often coerced. 

There is an effort in Great Britain to ban first-cousin marriages, as Sweden and Norway have, but the law is stalled because Keir Starmer won't budge. The reason is simple: the practice is so common among Muslims that somewhere around 50% of marriages are between first cousins. The practice is so common in South Asia that some countries have as many as 80% of marriages consanguinous. 

Advertisement

Starmer and his government don't want to offend Muslims, so even though they acknowledge the problems associated with the practice, which go beyond health issues, they want to address it with "education," whatever that means. This is a country that lets rapists who have lived in Britain for two decades off from rape charges because they are not culturally educated yet. 

The general consensus among liberals in Britain seems to be that Muslims can do whatever they want. It is culturally insensitive to ask them to behave as Britons do, because that is colonialist or something. 

Not sure how, given that it is the British Isles that are being colonized, not the other way around. 

Advertisement


David Strom

585 Blog posts

Comments