On July 14, 2026, "Gus," one of the most complete specimens of Tyrannosaurus rex, went to an as yet unidentified buyer for US$50.1 million. This auction at Sotheby's set a record for most valuable fossil ever sold. Another dinosaur has entered the luxury collectibles market, a reminder that even Earth's deepest history can be sold to the highest bidder.To paleontologists like me, however, a fossil like "Gus" — excavated from the Hell Creek Formation in South Dakota over three years starting in 2021 by commercial collector Thomas Heitkamp and his team — is not a trophy or a work of art. It is an irreplaceable scientific archive. Fossils preserve evidence of evolution, extinction, growth, disease, injury and ancient ecosystems. They are finite, nonsubstitutable records of life’s history on Earth.Science depends on independent verification of claims and healthy debate. Researchers must be able to revisit specimens, test earlier conclusions and ask new questions.But once a scientifically important fossil enters a private collection, access for researchers is no longer guaranteed. Collectors typically sequester their fossils in their homes. Even when privately owned specimens are loaned to museums, the owners can change their minds, ending access at any time. This issue is especially of note when it comes to Tyrannosaurus rex; a 2025 study found that while there were 61 T. rex fossils in public trusts at that time, 71 were privately held.That is why the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, of which I'm a long-term member and president-elect, has long argued that scientifically significant vertebrate fossils belong in the public trust, curated in museums and universities that preserve them permanently, make them available for research and share them with the public.Finding a fossilSupporters of commercial fossil sales often argue that without sales to private collectors, specimens like "Gus" would remain buried or erode away. They’re right about one thing: Discovery matters. Many extraordinary fossils have been found by ranchers, hikers, amateur collectors and commercial excavators. Paleontology is accessible to everyone who has an eye for observing nature — you don't need to be an expert with academic credentials to make an important discovery.Fossil kits are sold on Amazon and other online retailers, encouraging curiosity in budding paleontologists. (Image credit: Amazon)But discovery is only the beginning. A fossil's scientific value depends on careful documentation of where it was found, the rocks surrounding it, and the plants and animals preserved alongside it. Those details allow scientists to reconstruct ancient ecosystems, understand how an animal lived and died, and interpret how its remains became fossilized. When that contextual information is incomplete or lost, much of the fossil's scientific value is lost as well.Yet even discovery, excavation and publication barely scratch the surface of a fossil's scientific importance. The greatest scientific value of a specimen often comes decades later, when researchers ask new questions and apply new technologies that earlier generations never imagined. A specimen that seems fully studied today may yield surprising new information tomorrow, but only if it is still available for study.Delayed discoveriesConsider the iconic dinosaurs, including T. rex, Triceratops, Diplodocus and Stegosaurus, first collected more than a century ago. Early paleontologists could describe their shapes but had no way to dig deeper by peering inside the bones. Because those specimens were preserved in museum collections, later generations could revisit them with technologies that didn't exist when they were discovered.Paleontologist Larry Witmer and his collaborators at Ohio University started using CT imaging 20 years ago to reconstruct the internal anatomy of historic dinosaur fossils without damaging them, based on how X-rays travel through specimens. Brain cavities, inner ears, air spaces, nerves and blood vessels became visible for the first time, revealing how dinosaurs balanced, heard, smelled and perceived their world.Henry Fricke, Thomas Cullen and other geochemists have used isotopic signatures preserved in fossil teeth and eggshells to reconstruct dinosaur diets, migration patterns and body temperatures. This research has revealed how dinosaurs lived: what they ate, how they moved through ancient landscapes, and even how warm their bodies were.More recently, molecular paleontologist Jasmina Wiemann and her collaborators have identified chemical traces preserved in fossil bone, eggshell and skin that reveal aspects of dinosaur biology unimaginable even a generation ago. Until now, paleontologists had no way to know details about metabolic rates and reproduction or the colors of skin, feathers and eggs.A thin section of a Diplodocus femur reveals the microscopic architecture of the bone, preserving a record of the animal's growth and life history.  (Image credit: Kristina Curry Rogers)In my own research I use microscopes to uncover the hidden stories preserved inside dinosaur bones and teeth. Thin sections of fossil bones reveal that dinosaurs grew more like mammals and birds than like oversized reptiles. Microscopic modifications to bones capture traces of ancient scavenging, and tiny signatures deep inside baby dinosaur bones indicate the moment of hatching.None of these discoveries would have been possible if the original fossils had vanished into inaccessible private collections.Shared natural heritage, on the auction blockFossils are not static objects whose scientific value is exhausted once they are described. Their value grows as science advances, but only if future researchers can continue to examine the original specimens.Of course, sometimes dinosaur fossils are rescued from obscurity through purchase and immediate deposition or donation to natural history museums. Some of the world's most important dinosaur fossils are accessible today because individuals, companies or organizations with the means to acquire extraordinary specimens recognized that they belong where scientists can continue to study them and where future generations can learn from them.Schoolchildren were among the first to visit 'Sue' the T. rex once it was displayed at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago, Ill., thanks to funding from the California State University system, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts and McDonald's. (Image credit: copyright The Field Museum)Purchasing a fossil in order to place it permanently in the public trust is fundamentally different from acquiring it as a private collectible: One expands access, the other leaves access uncertain.Related storiesLargest dinosaur ever auctioned sells for over $6 million — and it's twice as long as a school busFirst Gorgosaurus to hit auction block may sell for $8 millionMaximus, 'one of the best' T. rex skulls on record, could fetch $20 million at auctionBut as fossil prices rise into the millions, museums increasingly cannot compete. The most significant fossils are no longer reliably entering public collections. Instead, they are becoming luxury assets whose market value supersedes their scientific value.Dinosaurs belong to our shared natural heritage. They inspire wonder because they connect all of us to a world unimaginably older than our own. For me, the question raised by auctions like the one on July 14 of "Gus" is not who can afford to own these relics of the past. It is whether future generations have the chance to study and learn from them.This edited article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.How much do you know about the king of the dinosaurs? Test your knowledge with our T. rex quiz!

The massive hardware demands of artificial intelligence (AI) applications are stretching the physical and structural limitations of semiconductors. But researchers have engineered a three-dimensional silicon chip that they propose as the solution.In a new study published May 27 in the journal Nature, scientists found a way to cram more computing power into a chip by stacking silicon circuits in multiple layers in a way that doesn't impact performance. Stacking chips vertically, known as 3D integration, is more efficient than traditional 2D chips, where silicon circuits are spread across a single surface. This is because stacking shortens the distance that data has to travel and reduces the power required for data transmission.The researchers' 3D chip uses ultrathin silicon membranes and low-temperature manufacturing techniques to overcome the challenges of current chip architectures. "Our method is not only easier to implement with lower cost, but it has several advantages over previous approaches to stack silicon wafers," Qing Cao, first author of the study and a materials science and engineering professor at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, said in a statement.Extending Moore's lawSince the 1960s, ensuring that electronics can handle more demanding applications has meant making transistors smaller so more can be packed onto a single chip. But, as Cao pointed out, doubling the number of transistors every couple of years — a principle known as Moore's law — is becoming less feasible."If you look at the actual size of transistors, they're not getting smaller, especially in terms of their contacted gate pitch," Cao said in the statement — defined as the combined width of one transistor gate and the space needed to separate it from the next. "This is because we're becoming limited by the intrinsic material properties of silicon and the fundamental rules of quantum mechanics. If we're going to keep up the trend of increasing processing power of our microprocessors, we have to start thinking beyond just squeezing more devices on a single surface."The researchers think vertical integration across multiple layers is the best way to guarantee that engineers can continue to adhere to Moore's law, because this approach creates room for more transistors on a chip. "Today it takes six microelectronic devices called transistors on a single plane to store one bit of information," Cao explained, suggesting that just like in a densely populated city, the only way to solve overcrowding is to build upward. "You get the same functionality, but the spatial footprint is reduced while making communication between layers faster and more efficient."Scientist Gordon Moore seen with a graph representing Moore's Law. (Image credit: Intel)Getting around the heat problem Stacking is nothing new, of course, but vertical integration — building layers directly on top of one another — can create thermally dense packages. In the study, the researchers noted that the fabrication of high-quality silicon chips demands temperatures up to 1,832 degrees Fahrenheit (1,000 degrees Celsius). However, once the first chip layer has been completed, the metal wiring introduced to connect further layers can be destroyed by such high temperatures. As a result, the "thermal budget" — the maximum amount of heat that can be endured before degradation starts to occur — for any additional layers is 752 F (400 C), said Cao. This can result in performance and reliability issues.When creating 3D stacked silicon chips, manufacturers have sought to avoid this problem by using alternatives to single-crystalline silicon for the upper layers, according to the researchers. These materials include amorphous and nanocrystalline metal oxides, carbon nanotubes and polycrystalline silicon, but they can lead to performance and reliability issues, the scientists said in the study. To overcome this challenge, Cao and his team adopted an approach called "monolithic integration" — a process in which all chip components are fabricated on a single piece of substrate, as opposed to making them separately and then bonding them together later. To build each chip, the researchers created ultrathin silicon nanomembranes that they then transferred, using a roll laminator, onto a substrate containing the bottom layer. Related storiesScientists say they've eliminated a major AI bottleneck — now they can process calculations 'at the speed of light'Scientists trained an AI model using an IBM quantum computer — and it answered questions correctly that the base model couldn'tWhat's the biggest bottleneck to building better AI? It's no longer the lack of computing resources — it's generating enough energy to feed itThe maximum temperature required to generate a strong bond using this method was just 392 F (200 C) — five times less than the heat normally required. The membranes they transferred were also just 10 nanometers thick or less — about the size of a protein — compared with the approximately 500-to-700-micrometer (500,000 to 700,000 nanometers) thickness of a typical wafer. Because they are thin, these membranes are mechanically flexible to conform to the underlying surface, Cao added. The result of this process was a 3D chip with three layers, each containing 625 transistors. This pales in comparison to the billions of transistors that can be crammed onto chips already on the market, but the researchers believe their technology boasts power efficiency benefits. The electrical current that can flow through the chip has proved to be at least three to four times greater than that of monolithic chips made from alternative materials.The big question is whether their 3D silicon chip can make the leap from the laboratory to commercial applications. While the research demonstrates the potential of a chip comprising three stacked layers, the scientists suggested that plenty more layers can be added in future iterations.Can you match these ancient devices to their pictures? Find out with our computing quiz!

You think you know a guy...ScienceAlert stories are written, fact-checked, and edited by humans, never generated by AI. Don't miss a story, subscribe here.

The "red tide" algal blooms that are becoming more frequent along the Pacific coast produce one of the most potent neurotoxins known: saxitoxin, or STX. The toxin accumulates in shellfish and causes paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP) when consumed.

The vast majority of carbon emissions caused by "mega-events" such as World Cups and global concert tours come from audience travel, according to University of Cambridge researchers. In a new study, researchers estimate that expanding to 48 teams for this year's World Cup increased emissions by well over half a million metric tons to some 4.23 million metric tons of carbon for the whole tournament, 82% of which comes from traveling fans, with around 3 million metric tons from flying alone.