WASHINGTON — Prominent Democrats expressed profound surprise and concern Monday following yet another assassination attempt on President Donald J. Trump at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, where armed intruders were neutralized before reaching the ballroom. Party leaders, strategists, and media allies who had previously described Trump as an existential threat requiring urgent “bullseyes,” “elimination,” or “pushing back” in the strongest possible terms, suddenly found themselves puzzled by the emergence of actual violence directed at the president. Two and a half minutes straight of Democracts calling for violence pic.twitter.com/cqFS4thKnj pic.twitter.com/1jk5QwX6bi— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) April 26, 2026 “This level of political violence is deeply disturbing and has no place in our democracy,” said one senior Democratic operative who, only months earlier, had cheered constituent calls for “blood” to draw media attention when legal and electoral efforts fell short. “We must lower the temperature immediately — by which we mean everyone should stop noticing whose rhetoric helped heat it up in the first place.” The pattern of astonishment was widespread. Figures who once warned that Trump’s survival posed a mortal danger to the republic now appeared genuinely taken aback that repeated invocations of existential stakes might have inspired unbalanced individuals to act on those stakes with firearms rather than strongly worded op-eds. “We have consistently condemned all forms of violence,” insisted a House Democrat who had previously suggested constituents prepare for “violence to fight to protect our democracy” when civility proved insufficient. “It is shocking — truly shocking — that heated words about putting targets on political opponents could somehow translate into people attempting to put actual bullets near them. No one could have predicted this sequence of events.” Political analysts described the reaction as a masterclass in narrative maintenance. “The rhetoric was always metaphorical,” explained one cable news commentator who had spent years framing Trump as a clear and present danger to the republic. “When we said ‘he has to go’ or ‘this is a fight for survival,’ we obviously meant through indictments, elections, and the occasional strategic leak. The idea that some people might take it literally is both unforeseeable and, frankly, Trump’s fault for continuing to exist as a lightning rod.” Trump responded via Truth Social: “They spent years saying I’m Hitler, a threat to democracy, time to put me in the bullseye — and now they’re ‘shocked’ someone tried to shoot me again? These people are not serious. Greatest survival streak in history. Many people are saying it.” As of press time, several Democratic lawmakers had issued joint statements reaffirming their principled opposition to political violence in all its forms, provided the violence is not preceded by years of their own colleagues describing the target as an existential cancer that must be excised from the body politic. One lawmaker added, off the record, “Look, we just wanted him defeated politically. The part where people started taking the apocalyptic language literally was never in the focus-grouped messaging.” Florists near Capitol Hill reported increased demand for “Thoughts and Prayers for a Cooling of Rhetoric (But Not Too Much Self-Reflection)” bouquets, while meme economists noted a modest uptick in sales of “I’m Shocked — Shocked!” casino chips from classic film distributors. The post BREAKING: People who have been calling for violence targeting Trump for 10 years ‘shocked’ of all the violence targeting Trump appeared first on Genesius Times.

Click here for no ads video >Intellectual Froglegs  DONATE to A.F. Branco Cartoons – Tips appreciated – $5.00, $10.00, $20.00 – It all helps to fund this website and keep the cartoons coming. Also, Venmo @AFBranco – THANK YOU! A.F. Branco has taken his two greatest passions (art and politics) and translated them into cartoons that have been popular all over the country in various news outlets, including NewsMax, Fox News, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, and “The Washington Post.” He has been recognized by such personalities as Rep. Devin Nunes, Dinesh D’Souza, James Woods, Chris Salcedo, Sarah Palin, Larry Elder, Lars Larson, Rush Limbaugh, Elon Musk, and President Trump.

NEW YORK — Following the Biden DOJ’s lead and citing a “clear pattern of evading accountability,” Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg announced Monday that his office is bringing fresh criminal charges against President Donald J. Trump related to the former president’s persistent habit of not being assassinated. The latest incident occurred Saturday night at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner in Washington, where loud bangs prompted a security scare, Secret Service agents evacuated Trump, First Lady Melania Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and others, and a suspect was apprehended at a checkpoint. Trump once again emerged completely unharmed. “Mr. Trump has now survived multiple documented attempts on his life with a consistency that this office finds deeply concerning,” Bragg said during a brief press availability outside the Manhattan Criminal Courthouse. “New Yorkers expect equal justice under the law. Repeatedly failing to become a victim undermines public confidence in the process.” According to court documents, Bragg’s office has charged Trump with: Reckless Survival in the First Degree — for allegedly positioning himself in such a way that highly trained protective details could neutralize threats before any injury occurred, thereby depriving the public of closure. Obstruction of Narrative — by continuing to breathe normally after the incident, Trump is accused of interfering with the expected media cycle that typically follows high-profile political violence. Aggravated Not Dying — a felony enhancement applied due to Trump’s history of similar non-events, demonstrating what prosecutors describe as “willful and repeated disregard for becoming a martyr.” Legal analysts described the charges as “innovative.” One Columbia Law School professor, speaking on background, noted, “We’ve seen novel applications of existing statutes before, but extending Manhattan jurisdiction to presidential survival in D.C. shows real prosecutorial creativity.” Bragg’s office emphasized that the case has nothing to do with politics. “This is about holding powerful individuals responsible when their extraordinary good fortune begins to look like a pattern,” a spokesperson said. “No one is above the law — especially not someone who keeps refusing to cooperate with the natural consequences of heated political rhetoric.” Trump responded on Truth Social with characteristic restraint: “Bragg is charging me for NOT getting shot? The guy who lost every other case is now mad I’m alive. These people are deranged. Greatest survival since the election. Many people are saying it!” As of press time, Trump’s legal team had filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that “not sustaining gunshot wounds” does not appear anywhere in the New York Penal Law. Meanwhile, Bragg’s office indicated it would seek a change of venue if necessary — possibly to a friendlier jurisdiction — while reminding reporters that the hush-money conviction remains on appeal and unrelated. In a related development, local stationery suppliers reported brisk sales of “Thoughts and Prayers… Or Whatever” cards, and several progressive legal commentators praised Bragg for “finally addressing the real victims: the storylines.” The post Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg Files Charges Against Trump for Surviving Another Assassination Attempt appeared first on Genesius Times.