5G is a possible death sentence for humans New peer-reviewed research has found that children who get too close to 5G wireless towers develop serious health problems such as chronic headaches‚ stomach pain‚ and difficulty sleeping. Three children and their parents came down with these and other symptoms after vacationing at a summer home located just 125 meters away from a mobile phone tower with multiple 5G antennas. Published in the journal Annals of Clinical and Medical Case Reports‚ the study reveals that the family members’ symptoms quickly subsided after they left the summer home and went back to their regular home‚ which is not located as close to 5G antennas. The children‚ who ranged in age from four to eight‚ also developed emotional symptoms from being in close proximity to the 5G antennas. These include heightened irritability as the radiation inflamed their senses. (Related: Both 5G and 4G wireless technology are linked to cell tissue damage and DNA destruction.)Save 40% on DNA Force Plus NOW! Try it today and see why so many listeners have made it an essential part of their daily routine! 5G is a possible death sentence for humans Dr. Lennart Hardell‚ a leading scientist on cancer risks from radiation‚ and Mona Nilsson put together their own report about how 5G affects the health of young children‚ with Hardell‚ an oncologist and epidemiologist‚ telling The Defender the following: “It is well known in medicine that children are more sensitive to toxic agents than grownups. Moreover‚ they have a longer life expectancy so chronic health issues may develop over a longer time.” According to Hardell‚ 5G is still “quite new‚” which means there is very little study into its effects. It is almost as if government regulators gave the telecommunications industry rubber stamp approval for the wireless technology without having first proven that it is safe. Miriam Eckenfels-Garcia‚ director of the Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Electromagnetic Radiation &; Wireless program‚ stated that the 5G rollout is “another example of financial and industry interests trumping the protection of our children’s health.” “As in this case study‚ we see the negative health impacts of this technology and instead of applying the precautionary principle until we can determine the full scope of health and environmental impacts‚ our government agencies – captured by industry – are allowing 5G to be installed anywhere and everywhere‚” Eckenfels-Garcia told The Defender. “CHD is doing all it can to push back against this dangerous development through litigation‚ education and advocacy‚ and we are grateful to scientists like Dr. Hardell and Mona Nilsson for shining light on these cases.” For the vacation home study‚ the family who went there was asked to fill out a questionnaire following their visit about the symptoms they and their children suffered while on holiday. They were asked to rank the severity of each symptom on a scale from one to 10. All three of the children‚ aged four‚ six and eight‚ reported having trouble sleeping and suffering emotional symptoms that included “irritability” and “emotive‚” both of which ranked at a level 10‚ the highest level. “Two of the children got diarrhea‚ pain in the stomach and headache graded between 8 and 3 on the severity scale‚” the study states. “The child aged 6 years who did not get pain in the stomach and diarrhea‚ got skin rashes graded 8 on the severity scale.” “The symptoms appeared soon after the arrival to the house and disappeared after they came home‚ where radiation levels were considerably lower.” Responding to the findings‚ Nilsson‚ who manages the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation‚ said that she finds them “very concerning‚” adding that children of that age should not yet be suffering from such symptoms‚ though they increasingly are as the “expected effects from increasing exposure to RF radiation.” More related news coverage can be found at 5Galert.com. Sources for this article include: AcmCaseReport.org ChildrensHealthDefense.org NaturalNews.com ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Liberal activists furious over Musk's decision to reinstate Alex Jones to X! It took the richest man in the world to begin dismantling the censorship-industrial complex; a tightly connected network of government agencies‚ think tanks‚ private media platforms‚ and activist organizations whose goal is to censor‚ control‚ and bankrupt free speech platforms under the guise of battling ‘hate speech’ and ‘misinformation’ that run counter to prevailing establishment narratives. One of these entities‚ the Center for Countering Digital Hate‚ is a dark money organization run by an alleged former British intelligence operative. We know all this because just over a year ago‚ X (formerly Twitter) owner Elon Musk disseminated the “Twitter Files” to a small group of independent journalists‚ from which we learned that the Biden administration collaborated with Twitter to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story‚ ban Donald Trump‚ and that the FBI essentially had its entire arm up Twitter’s ass in order to shape and control narratives. Here we go!! 🍿🍿 https://t.co/eILK9f3bAm— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 2‚ 2022 We also learned about the aforementioned relationships between the censorship-industrial complex.VasoBeet is now 40% OFF! This beetroot-based supplement was created to provide you with all the benefits of this nutrient-dense vegetable in one easy dose! Let the games begin! In August‚ Musk kicked off what has become several lawsuits against anti-free speech advocates‚ filing a lawsuit against the Center for Countering Digital Hate‚ which X has accused of “actively working to assert false and misleading claims encouraging advertisers to pause investment on the platform.” “X is a free public service funded largely by advertisers‚” according to a Twitter blog entry. “Through the CCDH’s scare campaign and its ongoing pressure on brands to prevent the public’s access to free expression‚ the CCDH is actively working to prevent public dialogue.” In October‚ Consortium News sued NewsGuard – a company which assigns scores to websites alleging to rank their credibility‚ for “acting jointly or in concert with the United States to coerce news organizations to alter viewpoints” regarding Ukraine‚ Russia and Syria‚ and has impsed a form of “censorship and repression of views” that diverge from US policies and those of its allies. The Biden administration was also named as a defendant in the lawsuit. Then in November‚ X filed a lawsuit against Media Matters‚ after threatening to file a “thermonuclear lawsuit” against the left-leaning activist group “and all those who colluded” with them in a disinformation campaign and advertiser boycott against the social media platform. The lawsuit‚ just filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas Fort Worth Division‚ alleges the organization’s tactics were manipulative and deceptive. The suit claims: Media Matters has opted for new tactics in its campaign to drive advertisers from X. Media Matters has manipulated the algorithms governing the user experience on X to bypass safeguards and create images of X’s largest advertisers’ paid posts adjacent to racist‚ incendiary content‚ leaving the false impression that these pairings are anything but what they actually are: manufactured‚ inorganic‚ and extraordinarily rare.Media Matters executed this plot in multiple steps‚ as X’s internal investigations have revealed. Following the lawsuit‚ Texas AG Ken Paxton announced an investigation into Media Matters for potential fraudulent activity. Last week‚ the state of Texas‚ the Daily Wire and The Federalist sued the US State Department for conspiring with Newsguard to censor American media companies‚ and that the government agency funded censorship technology designed to bankrupt domestic media outlets which have disfavored political opinions. Read the 67-page complaint here. Congress authorized creation of the Global Engagement Center expressly to counter foreign propaganda and misinformation. Instead‚ the agency weaponized this authority to violate the First Amendment and suppress Americans’ constitutionally-protected speech.— Texas Attorney General (@TXAG) December 6‚ 2023 Let’s get ready to Rumble… On Nov. 30‚ streaming video platform Rumble sued two liberal activists who they allege worked in conjunction with Media Matters to lie about their source of ad revenues‚ thereby causing material damage to their reputation‚ as well as the destruction of more than $185 million from their market cap – despite the fact that Rumble notified them that they were incorrect. Nandini Jammi (@nandoodles)‚ Claire Atkin (@catthekin) – founders of “Check My Ads‚” and nine anonymous individuals who work for Media Matters and Dewey Square‚ a “hyper-partisan public affairs agency.” For example‚ Jammi was salivating over the opportunity to further demonetize X before Musk’s decision to reinstate Alex Jones to the platform. I was part of the effort to get Alex Jones kicked off every major tech and marketing platform in 2018. Even @Apple won’t fuck with him. If Elon brings him back‚ I can’t emphasize how *easy* it’s going to be to convince the last of X’s advertisers to drop him. https://t.co/1XL9ggcfra— Nandini Jammi (@nandoodles) December 11‚ 2023 And now‚ Rumble is suing… So‚ Janni publicly decried that they were shifting their sights to Rumble. They despise what Rumble stands for. If this isn't evidence of malicious intent I am not sure what is. As per the complaint‚ they launched a disinformation campaign to demonetize Rumble and they bragged… pic.twitter.com/yDFri4F7zR— Tracy Beanz (@tracybeanz) December 12‚ 2023 Interestingly‚ Media Matters is accused of similar manipulation as the X lawsuit‚ namely that they manipulated Rumble’s platform to show Netflix ads next to a user-generated video expressing antisemitic views‚ which Media Matters staff ‘repeatedly refreshed‚’ which caused ‘Rumble’s advertising system to serve different advertisements until Media Matters found one that it could use as fodder for its public pressure campaign.” “As it turned out‚ the Media Matters employee engaging in this tactic was the only one to actually view the Netflix ad on the video.” And so‚ as the lawsuits against the censorship complex begin to fly‚ one can’t help but feel that the tide may actually be turning – or at least‚ said censors will think twice before spouting defamatory claims about platforms that allow divergent opinions. Rumble suing @nandoodles. First @elonmusk suing @CCDHate and @mmfa‚ then Consortium news suing @NewsGuardRating‚ then Texas suing Biden State Department‚ now Rumble suing @nandoodles and her liberal echo chamber The tide is turning against the censorship industrial complex https://t.co/b2n9NL0Axs— zerohedge (@zerohedge) December 12‚ 2023 Alex Jones Interviews Elon Musk About Humanity’s Ultimate Destiny

Biden used the "drawdown" provision in the Foreign Assistance Act that allows him to provide Defense Department stockpiles to countries without congressional approval. US President Joe Biden announced during a Tuesday joint meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that he has “just signed another $200 million drawdown” from the Pentagon for Ukraine. The announcement comes as Congress remains deadlocked on authorizing more aid to Ukraine. Biden has asked Congress to provide $60 billion in aid to Ukraine in a funding package that also includes aid for Israel and money to secure the southern US border. However‚ some Republicans have asked for more concessions on the border‚ including changes to the asylum system‚ a non-starter for many Democrats‚ in exchange for increased funding in Ukraine. The House of Representatives also passed a standalone aid bill for Israel‚ which the Senate has refused to consider. Zelensky visited Washington in what has been described by US media as a “last-ditch effort” to convince Congress to authorize more aid to his country. Part of that visit included separate meetings with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY). Both Johnson and Schumer said their meetings with Zelensky went well but had different opinions on the details of their meetings.Survival Shield X-2 is now 25% OFF! Treat your body with super high-quality nascent iodine &; enjoy one of nature's greatest essentials! Johnson criticized the Biden administration for not articulating how Ukraine can win against Russia. “The Biden administration appears to be asking for billions of dollars without specifics‚ without a clear strategy for winning‚ and without the answers I think the American people deserve‚” he said at a news conference following his meeting with Zelensky. Meanwhile‚ Schumer‚ who has been extremely hawkish on Ukraine since the start of the special military operation‚ claimed that Zelensky explained Ukraine’s path to victory to him. “He [Zelensky] described in detail what kind of help was needed and how it would help win. Even many of our Republican politicians were saying that we were winning this war‚” Schumer claimed. Schumer said he called Johnson and asked him to keep the House open after this week so the $61 billion aid package can be approved.”Last night‚ I spoke with Speaker Johnson and urged him to keep the House in session a little longer to give the supplemental a chance to come together‚” Schumer said at a briefing. The much smaller aid package announced by Biden on Tuesday uses an authorization provided in the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) which allows the president to provide foreign aid using stocks the Defense Department has on hand without congressional approval. This latest drawdown is at least the 53rd drawdown ordered by the Biden administration since the start of Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine. The last drawdown‚ costing $175 million‚ was ordered by the Biden White House last week. According to US media‚ the latest package includes High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS)‚ anti-armor systems‚ artillery rounds‚ demolition munitions‚ small arms ammunition‚ high-speed anti-radiation missiles‚ generators and spare parts‚ among other equipment. US media also reported the Defense Department has about $4.4 billion in weapons remaining that it can use through drawdown authorizations. According to a 2004 Department of Defense Security Cooperation handbook on the drawdown procedure‚ all equipment sent using drawdown authorization must be replaced with operations and maintenance funds already part of the Defense Department budget. During the meeting with Biden‚ Zelensky told reporters that he wants to use the $300 billion in frozen Russian assets to fight the conflict if Congress will not provide more aid. When asked if his country could win against Russia without aid from Congress‚ Zelensky reportedly did not answer verbally‚ shrugging his shoulders instead. MSM Now Reporting the Defeat of Zelensky by Russia is Imminent