Independent Sentinel News Feed
Independent Sentinel News Feed

Independent Sentinel News Feed

@indiesentinelfeed

500 CCP Birth Tourism Companies Won’t Affect SCOTUS Ruling
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

500 CCP Birth Tourism Companies Won’t Affect SCOTUS Ruling

Birth tourism — also called maternal or pregnancy tourism — involves traveling to another country specifically to give birth so the child can obtain citizenship by birthplace (jus soli). Popular destinations include the United States, Canada, Mexico, Portugal, Turkey, the UAE, and Hong Kong, each offering different legal frameworks, healthcare quality, and post-birth opportunities. A child born on U.S. soil is a U.S. citizen and, at age 21, can bring his or her parents to the U.S. We are looking at 1.5 million of these babies in China. There are at least 500 CCP birth tourism companies, and Chief Justice Roberts said it has no bearing on the legal analysis. Most people taking advantage are the elites, the wealthy of other nations, including enemy nations, who want to change us from within. Researcher and author Peter Schweizer reported in January that China supercharged ‘birth tourism’ and scammed American citizenship for up to 1.5 million babies. Chinese officials estimate that the number is a staggering 50,000 of their own citizens per year. Scholars who have studied the subject in depth, like Australia-based professor Salvator Babones, put the figure even higher, perhaps twice that. “With up to 100,000 Chinese babies being born to US citizens every year,” he writes, “birth tourism may result in millions of new elite Chinese-Americans.” Chinese birth tourism in the United States has been practiced for decades, but it has especially flourished in the past 15 years. That means at least 750,000 and possibly as many as 1.5 million Chinese, who are also American citizens by virtue of being born here, are now growing toward adulthood in China. Unfortunately, the Chinese Communists are not our friends. More than 70% of the newborns in Saipan are born to Chinese birth-tourist parents who use the territory’s 45-day visa-free visitation rules and the “Covenant of the Northern Mariana Islands” to ensure their children will have American citizenship. The Skeptics Given the disaster this is for the U.S., you would hope the Supreme Court would overturn this ruling that came into prominence in the ’80s when a left-wing justice snuck it into a footnote. The three leftists on the Supreme Court are skeptical of Trump’s case, as are Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney-Barrett. The Birth Tourism Companies Don’t Matter This morning, Justice Roberts said the 500 birth tourism companies don’t matter at all. [via Eric Daugherty] SCOTUS Justice John Roberts is VERY skeptical of President Trump ending birthright citizenship, repeatedly firing back at Trump’s top lawyer. This would mean we require Amy Coney Barrett for a shot at 5-4. SAUER: China has 500 birth tourism companies to bring people here to give birth and return to our nation! ROBERTS: That has no impact on the legal analysis…it’s a new world; it’s the same Constitution. SAUER: It is, and as Justice Scalia says, you have a constitutional provision that should extend to reasonably comparable evils. JUST IN: SCOTUS Justice John Roberts is VERY skeptical of President Trump ending birthright citizenship, repeatedly firing back at Trump’s top lawyer This would mean we require Amy Coney Barrett for a shot at 5-4. SAUER: China has 500 birth tourism companies to bring people… pic.twitter.com/3nB3KtIBUd — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 1, 2026 Amy Coney-Barrett was also skeptical. “I can imagine it being messy in some applications.” “What if you don’t know who the parents are? The post 500 CCP Birth Tourism Companies Won’t Affect SCOTUS Ruling appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

April Fools: Ketanji Jackson & te ACLU Are Serious About This
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

April Fools: Ketanji Jackson & te ACLU Are Serious About This

DEI Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson came up with an absurd argument to support Birthright Citizenship. She said, “I was thinking… I am a U.S. citizen visiting Japan. And what it means is that, you know, if I steal someone’s wallet in Japan, the Japanese authorities can arrest me and prosecute me. Its allegiance, meaning, can they control you as a matter of law?” “So there’s this relationship based on—even though I’m a temporary traveler, I’m just on vacation in Japan—I’m still locally owing allegiance in that sense. Is that the right way to think about it?” “And if so, doesn’t that explain why both temporary residents and undocumented people would have that kind of, quote-unquote, allegiance, just by virtue of being in the United States?” ACLU Lawyer Cecilia Wang: “That’s absolutely right, Justice Jackson.” Yikes! It’s hard to believe this is the argument. However, it doesn’t mean they will lose. For their perfectly ridiculous argument, Clown World welcomes Ketanji and the ACLU into Clown World as April’s Fools. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on birthright citizenship: “If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws… in a sense, it’s allegiance.” That’s her argument for granting automatic U.S. citizenship to children of illegal immigrants. Subject to the laws = full… pic.twitter.com/i8EoTQ3N2c — Officer Lew (@officer_Lew) April 1, 2026 The post April Fools: Ketanji Jackson & te ACLU Are Serious About This appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

President Pezeshkian Releases His Important Letter to Americans
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

President Pezeshkian Releases His Important Letter to Americans

According to The Kobeissi Letter, Iranian official Mehdi Tabatabai says their President Pezeshkian will release an “important letter” to the American people in “a few hours.” It has now been released. The letter: IRAN’S FULL “OPEN LETTER” TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: “To the people of the United States of America, and to all those who, amid a flood of distortions and manufactured narratives, continue to seek the truth and aspire to a better life: Iran—by this very name, character, and identity—is one of the oldest continuous civilizations in human history. Despite its historical and geographical advantages at various times, Iran has never, in its modern history, chosen the path of aggression, expansion, colonialism, or domination. Even after enduring occupation, invasion, and sustained pressure from global powers—and despite possessing military superiority over many of its neighbors—Iran has never initiated a war. Yet it has resolutely and bravely repelled those who have attacked it. The Iranian people harbor no enmity toward other nations, including the people of America, Europe, or neighboring countries. Even in the face of repeated foreign interventions and pressures throughout their proud history, Iranians have consistently drawn a clear distinction between governments and the peoples they govern. This is a deeply rooted principle in Iranian culture and collective consciousness—not a temporary political stance. For this reason, portraying Iran as a threat is neither consistent with historical reality nor with present-day observable facts. Such a perception is the product of political and economic whims of the powerful— the need to manufacture an enemy in order to justify pressure, maintain military dominance, sustain the arms industry, and control strategic markets. In such an environment, if a threat does not exist, it is invented. Within this same framework, the United States has concentrated the largest number of its forces, bases, and military capabilities around Iran—a country that, at least since the founding of the United States, has never initiated a war. Recent American aggressions launched from these very bases have demonstrated how threatening such a military presence truly is. Naturally, no country confronted with such conditions would forgo strengthening its defensive capabilities. What Iran has done—and continues to do—is a measured response grounded in legitimate self-defense, and by no means an initiation of war or aggression. Relations between Iran and the United States were not originally hostile, and early interactions between the Iranian and American people were not marred with hostility or tension. The turning point, however, was the 1953 coup d’état—an illegal American intervention aimed at preventing the nationalization of Iran’s own resources. That coup disrupted Iran’s democratic process, reinstated dictatorship, and sowed deep distrust among Iranians toward U.S. policies. This distrust deepened further with America’s support for the Shah’s regime, its backing of Saddam Hussein during the imposed war of the 1980s, the imposition of the longest and most comprehensive sanctions in modern history, and ultimately, unprovoked military aggression—twice, in the midst of negotiations—against Iran. Yet all these pressures have failed to weaken Iran. On the contrary, the country has grown stronger in many areas: literacy rates have tripled—from roughly 30% before the Islamic Revolution to over 90% today; higher education has expanded dramatically; significant advances have been achieved in modern technology; healthcare services have improved; and infrastructure has developed at a pace and scale incomparable to the past. These are measurable, observable realities that stand independent of fabricated narratives. At the same time, the destructive and inhumane impact of sanctions, war, and aggression on the lives of the resilient Iranian people must not be underestimated. The continuation of military aggression and recent bombings profoundly affect people’s lives, attitudes, and perspectives. This reflects a fundamental human truth: when war inflicts irreparable harm on lives, homes, cities, and futures, people will not remain indifferent toward those responsible. This raises a fundamental question: Exactly which of the American people’s interests are truly being served by this war? Was there any objective threat from Iran to justify such behavior? Does the massacre of innocent children, the destruction of cancer-treatment pharmaceutical facilities, or boasting about bombing a country “back to the stone ages” serve any purpose other than further damaging the United States’ global standing? Iran pursued negotiations, reached an agreement, and fulfilled all its commitments. The decision to withdraw from that agreement, escalate toward confrontation, and launch two acts of aggression in the midst of negotiations were destructive choices made by the U.S. government—choices that served the delusions of a foreign aggressor. Attacking Iran’s vital infrastructure—including energy and industrial facilities—directly targets the Iranian people. Beyond constituting a war crime, such actions carry consequences that extend far beyond Iran’s borders. They generate instability, increase human and economic costs, and perpetuate cycles of tension, planting seeds of resentment that will endure for years. This is not a demonstration of strength; it is a sign of strategic bewilderment and an inability to achieve a sustainable solution. Is it not also the case that America has entered this aggression as a proxy for Israel, influenced and manipulated by that regime? Is it not true that Israel, by manufacturing an Iranian threat, seeks to divert global attention away from its crimes toward the Palestinians? Is it not evident that Israel now aims to fight Iran to the last American soldier and the last American taxpayer dollar—shifting the burden of its delusions onto Iran, the region, and the United States itself in pursuit of illegitimate interests? Is “America First” truly among the priorities of the U.S. government today? I invite you to look beyond the machinery of misinformation—an integral part of this aggression—and instead speak with those who have visited Iran. Observe the many accomplished Iranian immigrants—educated in Iran—who now teach and conduct research at the world’s most prestigious universities, or contribute to the most advanced technology firms in the West. Do these realities align with the distortions you are being told about Iran and its people? Today, the world stands at crossroads. Continuing along the path of confrontation is more costly and futile than ever before. The choice between confrontation and engagement is both real and consequential; its outcome will shape the future for generations to come. Throughout its millennia of proud history, Iran has outlasted many aggressors. All that remains of them are tarnished names in history, while Iran endures—resilient, dignified, and proud.” The BS meter is going off. Earlier, the Foreign Minister spoke: Iran’s Foreign Ministry says it is not seeking a ceasefire with the U.S. and Israel but a complete end to the war across the region, with guarantees against future attacks and compensation for damages. pic.twitter.com/8x4o1C8wOc — Open Source Intel (@Osint613) April 1, 2026 The post President Pezeshkian Releases His Important Letter to Americans appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Obama Judge OKs Lawsuits Against Trump for His “Inciting Words” on J6
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

Obama Judge OKs Lawsuits Against Trump for His “Inciting Words” on J6

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta, appointed by Barack Obama, ruled Tuesday that Trump’s remarks at his Stop the Steal rally plausibly were inciting words that were not protected by the 1st amendment right to speech. He said he is not shielded from liability for his conduct and many of his social media posts that day. He agreed that he cannot be held liable for his official acts that day “President Trump has not shown that the Speech reasonably can be understood as falling within the outer perimeter of his Presidential duties,” Mehta wrote. “The content of the Ellipse Speech confirms that it is not covered by official-acts immunity.” The Obama judge said he is not immune from civil claims. [[File:Mehta A.jpg|Mehta_A]]Obama’s judgeThe 79-page ruling is meant to set the stage for a civil trial in that courthouse where Trump was charged with crimes for his January 6th conduct. In 2022, Mehta refused to dismiss claims against Trump, ruling that Trump was not entitled to presidential immunity. He also claimed that his speech plausibly amounted to incitement and was not protected by the 1st amendment. The media is only reporting this sentence: Trump closed out his speech by saying, “We fight. We fight like hell, and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” Trump meant that figuratively, and it is a commonly used expression understood to be figurative, not literal. They are leaving this out: He also told the crowd to march “peacefully and patriotically.” Additionally, the riot had started before the crowd moved onto the capital while the president was still speaking. President Trump has risked his life, his freedom, and his wealth for America. That is why I will continue to support him, even though I oppose these wars. I try to stick with the person I support through the tough times. The post Obama Judge OKs Lawsuits Against Trump for His “Inciting Words” on J6 appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Listen Live to Birthright Citizenship Debate at SCOTUS
Favicon 
www.independentsentinel.com

Listen Live to Birthright Citizenship Debate at SCOTUS

Listen Live to the debate on Birthright Citizenship. The Chief Justice seems skeptical, Ketanji’s argument is lacking. We will need Coney-Barrett on our side. LIVE: U.S. Supreme Court Hears Birthright Citizenship Arguments – 4/1/26 https://t.co/lcDzc5vVRQ — RSBN (@RSBNetwork) April 1, 2026 Ketanji makes little sense. BREAKING: President Trump has just LEFT the Supreme Court after watching John Sauer absolutely EVISCERATE SCOTUS DEI Ketanji Brown Jackson's pro-illegal immigrant birthright citizenship arguments for OVER 9 minutes: Sauer makes it crystal clear: the 14th Amendment requires… https://t.co/UyT7LUZEpr pic.twitter.com/vtP2NOHj5g — Morse Report (@MorseReport) April 1, 2026 Chief Justice John Roberts appears skeptical of ending birthright citizenship, which has been devastating for the USA. It invites mass illegal immigration. NOW: President Trump just witnessed a MASTERCLASS where Solicitor General John Sauer gave a perfect response to Justice John Roberts on birthright citizenship "What does that mean, subject to the jurisdiction thereof? And he says, it means not owing allegiance to ANYBODY… pic.twitter.com/QSNoaEgO7r — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 1, 2026 JUST IN: SCOTUS Justice John Roberts is VERY skeptical of President Trump ending birthright citizenship, repeatedly firing back at Trump's top lawyer This would mean we require Amy Coney Barrett for a shot at 5-4. SAUER: China has 500 birth tourism companies to bring people… pic.twitter.com/3nB3KtIBUd — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) April 1, 2026 Justice Kagan: JUST IN: President Trump's lawyer John Sauer drops a massive TRUTH NUKE on liberal SCOTUS Justice Elena Kagan: Sauer just argued that the 14th Amendment CLEARLY requires allegiance to America, not a foreign power, meaning the children of illegal immigrants do NOT qualify for… https://t.co/tGAAXAHq7j pic.twitter.com/qGYNTn1sjz — Morse Report (@MorseReport) April 1, 2026 Owing allegiance to the USA. The oral arguments commence on the birthright citizenship case in the Supreme Court, with President Trump sitting in. U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer : "The 14th Amendment does NOT extend citizenship to illegal aliens. Unlike the slaves, they don't have immediate allegiance to… pic.twitter.com/hWavy52exB — Chuckyfamous! (@Nem_Famous) April 1, 2026 Truth on illegal immigration: BREAKING: Liberals stunned after Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito drops a perfect truth bomb on the 14th Amendment: He says that just because illegal immigrants were not an issue when the 14th Amendment was adopted, it does NOT mean they shouldn't be addressed now! ALITO:… https://t.co/rJOXc1D9Bj pic.twitter.com/BiZ62cPiJC — Morse Report (@MorseReport) April 1, 2026 The post Listen Live to Birthright Citizenship Debate at SCOTUS appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.