Saturday’s 2026 White House Correspondents Dinner was expected to be an unprecedented affair with President Trump and members of his Cabinet entering political enemy territory on liberal, elite media’s biggest single annual day of self-adulating slop. Trump later joked he had prepared “the most inappropriate speech ever made,” but he was unable to deliver it as a gunman tore through a security checkpoint just after 8:30 p.m. Eastern during dinner. In CNN’s case, they abruptly pulled out of a commercial break. Below are some of the big moments from CNN’s coverage of what was already going to be a history-making evening, but came that for all the wrong reasons. Before the shooting, CNN’s Brian Stelter argued to Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt that, while “you say he’s been very accessible,” the President “tries to demonize the press.” Stelter also offered standard fare, bemoaning Trump “has gone on the warpath against news outlets,” “called journalists…nasty names,” and “defunded PBS and NPR.” He even speculated a long Trump speech would cause questions to be raised “about his fitness for office.” But, as we’ll see, Stelter became a real, genuine source of information once the evening took a turn. But back to life before the shooting, Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) sufferer S.E. Cupp dropped at 8:08 p.m. Eastern the hottest take of the night, which was made scalding hot when violence erupted (click the tweet to read the lunacy in full): CNN's SE Cupp, chronically miserable and stricken with TDS, on the #WHCD, says "Trump wants us dead, figuratively"... "[The @WHCA] made it real easy for him to attend. And I, you know, glad to see everyone's in great spirits. And this is a party. I'm real bummed. Real bummed… pic.twitter.com/nxlrJnJQlb — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Fellow CNN liberal Van Jones wasn’t having any of this. Instead, he said the WHCD “is a wonderful evening in Washington, D.C., where people come together and put aside their partisan differences,” which “is awesome” and “I don’t care about what anybody says.” Our friend and 2025 MRC Bulldog Award winner Scott Jennings was also jubilant and directly addressed Cupp by opining, “journalism has never had more access to the leader of the free world than they have right now.” “[H]e may roast the press, and they spend 24 hours a day roasting him, and they need to have a little bit of thick skin and put on their big boy pants and take it…I think the press is thriving in the Trump era. The access we have and the information that we get to bring to the American people, because he allows it is a good thing, objectively a good thing,” he added. Following more banter and then White House Correspondents Association President Weijia Jiang’s opening remarks, CNN went to break. Here was the movement they jolted out to share the disturbing turn: BREAKING: The #WHCD is cleared, people sent scattering and President cleared from the stage after a loud commotion seen inside pic.twitter.com/7Md7qToqHV — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Less than five minutes later, co-hosts John Berman and Laura Coates went to Stelter inside the Washington Hilton ballroom as he had taken out his phone and began streaming to describe what was happening: .@BrianStelter at 838 pm Eastern inside the #WHCD: "Hey, John. I'm going to be honest. Nobody knows what's going on. But you'll see there are people literally hiding under tables inside the ballroom of the Washington. We have seen many different security officers, some of them… pic.twitter.com/U92SksOI5v — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 CNN host Kaitlan Collins also called in (with someone else streaming her vantage point, alongside Secretary of Education Linda McMahon): BREAKING: At 843 pm Eastern, CNN's @KaitlanCollins says there was a shooter INSIDE the #WHCD in the Hilton lobby pic.twitter.com/z1gB6cNns5 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Stelter then returned to talk things through with CNN’s congressional Republican chaser Manu Raju: Credit to @BrianStelter for taking out his cellphone and streaming for @CNN, discussing with @KaitlanCollins and @MajorCBS earlier and now @MKRaju, admitting at 849pm Eastern that the #WHCD shooting has a lot of people shook up pic.twitter.com/ms6PlY4oJ9 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 The most bizarre moment of all this came next when The Lead and State of the Union host Jake Tapper not only took Stelter’s phone, but kept spinning around. Do with that as you may: CNN's Jake Tapper -- with @BrianStelter's phone -- took viewers on quite the spin after spin while describing the chaos inside the Washington Hilton after the #WHCD shooting pic.twitter.com/BZDWKCiiqV — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Back on-set and with word Trump and the WHCA had wanted to resume the event (before security put their foot down), Jones said “there is some strength that's trying to be shown here” in “[t]hat you don't stop this country and you don't stop the celebration of the First Amendment because you're a crazy person with a gun.” On political violence, he said “this is the sort of stuff that has to stop” and “[t]his is the level of violence and crazy stuff on all sides of this country, is leading people to think that this is the right thing to do.” Jennings agreed with his friend and went even further: CNN's @ScottJenningsKy on the #WHCD shooting: "I couldn't agree with [@VanJones68] more actually about the need to continue. You can't let people who are committed to using violence to silence our political process win. You cannot do it. The country is built on speech and debate,… pic.twitter.com/tZCdKNwpo0 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 After Jiang’s first update to the room, CNN had a series of calls over the next hour-plus with The Situation Room co-host Wolf Blitzer recounting his harrowing experience of being steps away from the shooter and being tackled and shielded by a police officer: NEW: At 9pm Eastern, CNN's Wolf Blitzer calls into describe his recollections of being STEPS AWAY from the shooting at the #WHCD, including being thrown to the ground and covered by a police officer pic.twitter.com/42CRGCh9QU — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 About ten minutes later, CNN's Wolf Blitzer shares more about how he was FEET away from the #WHCD gunman and saw him being neutralized by police pic.twitter.com/MzO6SpsaTd — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 CNN's Wolf Blitzer found someone's cellphone camera, so he could explain on-air at 915pm Eastern what happened and saw the gunman "just maybe three, four, or five feet away," so he was tackled and protected by a police officer pic.twitter.com/B4OnWmkX8Y — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 CNN's @WolfBlitzer: "The shooter seemed to have gone through the metal detectors, but he had a weapon, and he was firing a weapon at least a half a dozen, maybe six or more shots. And the noise was so powerful it scared all of us. I, of course, immediately knew what that noise… pic.twitter.com/lWsebva5Q2 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 CNN eventually came back to Cupp and, at 9:24 p.m. Eastern, she stepped on another proverbial rake by demanding viewers keep an open mind and that the target may have been journalists, not the President: CNN's SE Cupp says the #WHCD cannot continue b/c of the ongoing "violence against journalists" and "politicians"... "Can I just say something? While I appreciate the courage and stoicism from my colleagues here and @Weijia at -- at the -- at the dais to continue this night, what… pic.twitter.com/Hg5KlOWurp — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Jones delivered a respectful but forceful response to Cupp about the need to show resilience: CNN's @VanJones68 on the #WHCD shooting: "I think that there's a number of things that are being balanced here. SE spoke well to the human dimension. People are probably shaken up. To the logistical dimension, can you do this? To a political dimension here, and this is the… pic.twitter.com/EI7XF5pR5i — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Jennings backed him up after Jiang announced the dinner’s postponement: “I think Van, you said it right earlier that the political element here is that we cannot allow people to believe they can show up with weapons and shut down anything that the President or the press or anything else we're doing that causes our it makes our country run on a daily basis. We cannot allow it.” Cupp and fellow liberal Van Lathan invoked gun violence and that this shooting reinforces the fact that “this country is sick” and nothing is supposedly being done about it, with no one, again, supposedly willing to acknowledge it: Liberal CNN panelists SE Cupp and Van Lantan say the #WHCD shooting is proof the "country is sick" and nothing is being done to address that fact pic.twitter.com/XmePRlxN7f — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Reporting outside the Hilton, weekday morning CNN News Central co-host Sara Sidner shared upsetting video she took after the attack of Erika Kirk being escorted out in tears and saying she wanted to get out: I cannot imagine how Erika Kirk felt being in the room when the #WHCD shooting happened CNN's Sara Sidner passed her leaving the Washington Hilton and said she was extremely upset and in tears, saying "I just want to leave" pic.twitter.com/sjI81XF0RU — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Moving into the 10:00 p.n. Eastern hour and before the President addressed the nation, Jennings reminded CNN’s liberal audience that many of those who protected the journalists and politicians assembled have been gone over 70 days without pay due to the partial government shutdown: .@ScottJennings at 1005pm Eastern on the #WHCD shooting: "You know, I saw a post from Congressman Jared Moskowitz, a Democrat from Florida who said that when this happened, it was Steve Scalise, the House Republican Majority Leader, who grabbed him and threw him into a secure… pic.twitter.com/GsjJRU4qB4 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 On a different but vital topic, Jones noted everyone there will experience the trauma differently: CNN's @VanJones68 at 1006pm Eastern on the #WHCD shooting... "I think that they obviously just did an extraordinary job. And the people -- the people I'm hearing from are, are shaken up. Look, people respond differently. You know, I've -- I've been shot at. You know, it's a very… pic.twitter.com/JFHwJW3YTm — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 He also gave Blitzer a shout-out: CNN's @VanJones68 shouts-out @WolfBlitzer for his calmness and willingness to speak about having been feet away from the #WHCD shooting... "And can we just give Wolf Blitzer some praise and some credit? He's the best to ever do it. And for him to be able to go through that and… pic.twitter.com/ZP6bVAsMHe — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Somehow, some way, Stelter made it across town to CNN’s D.C. bureau to join the panel and began sharing his recollections two hours post-gun shots: CNN's @BrianStelter on his instinct to take out his phone and start recording after the #WHCD shooting... "The only other time that's ever happened to me at CNN was a little bit like this night. It was the night there was a bomb threat at CNN in New York, and our colleague Don… pic.twitter.com/I7nygxaUM1 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 .@BrianStelter tells @ScottJenningsKY and @SECupp what he felt and experienced when he first felt the gunshots, plates crashing when chaos erupted pic.twitter.com/RYyrMgn35K — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Following the President’s press conference, those assembled rendered their final thoughts. Jones hailed Trump’s remarks and warned the public to steel itself for the possibility that a portion of the populace will lionize the suspect like many have with Luigi Mangione: CNN's @VanJones68 says he fears there will be a portion of America that will seek to lionize the #WHCD shooter in much the same way Luigi Mangione has.... "Well, I thought the President did well. I'm starting to worry about something, though, which is that the shooter survived,… pic.twitter.com/c2gMYcRJsf — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Jennings continued his theme of backing up his friend from across the political spectrum, stating Trump hit the “perfect tone” in showing unity with the press (despite the bombs both sides throw) and speed in delivering information to the public: WATCH: @ScottJenningsKY on President Trump's remarks about the #WHCD shooting... "I couldn't agree more with you, Van. And also anybody who attempts to rationalize it. You know, I think in the wake of some of these things, you get people who are saying, well, you know, you could… pic.twitter.com/0WvwOOABXX — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Finally, we’ll end this round-up and mishmash of moments across six hours of CNN coverage where we began with Stelter, who shared one of the first people to make sure he was okay after shots fired was someone Stelter has perhaps been the most viciously critical towards: WOW: CNN's @BrianStelter says @BrendanCarrFCC -- someone Brian is perhaps most critical of these days -- was one of the first people who checked on him as the #WHCD shooting chaos unfolded... pic.twitter.com/qaxtcxfu6L — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 While the liberal, elite media will almost certainly go back to war against President Trump by Sunday morning and perhaps even cheerlead a third impeachment in the months or years to come, they were able to largely come together on one night when someone in either camp (the media or the President’s) could have lost their life.

Late Saturday night, President Trump delivered a forceful set of remarks following the shooting inside the Washington Hilton outside the White House Correspondents Dinner (WHCD), calling it the work of a “very sick person” and “thug” who “attacked our Constitution” and “free speech” itself, but failed in his attempts at bloodshed. Rather, Trump said, it reminded Americans of the need to “recommit with their hearts and resolving our differences peacefully” even though “no country is immune” from political violence and what could be a third shooter who targeted him for assassination. Trump took to the podium at around 10:33 p.m. Eastern, immediately stating the evening’s result “was very unexpected” and the threat was “incredibly acted upon by the Secret Service and law enforcement.” BREAKING: President Trump's first remarks on the #WHCD shooting... "Well, thank you very much. That was very unexpected. But, uh, incredibly acted upon by the Secret Service and law enforcement, and this was an event dedicated to freedom of speech that was supposed to bring… pic.twitter.com/dl9aPKF2Lw — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 “[T]his was an event dedicated to freedom of speech that was supposed to bring together members of both parties with members of the press. And in a certain way, it did, because the fact that they just unified us in a room – that was just totally unified. It was, in one way, very beautiful, a very beautiful thing to see,” Trump added, speaking warmly of the press, a profession in which many seek to tear him down with epithets and tsunamis of negative headlines. He also said he immediately called for the relevant security footage to be released so Americans could see “the violence of this thug that attacked our Constitution, and…how quickly Secret Service and law enforcement acted on our country’s behalf, really did a great job.”; After sharing he spoke with a law enforcement officer who took a bullet to his bulletproof vest and arguing Saturday night gave him further evidence of the need for a White House ballroom, he acknowledged the prior two assassination attempts on his life in Butler, Pennsylvania and one of his Florida golf courses. The President pivoted back to the broader context of the evening and continued his magnanimous tone: Outstanding point and tone from President Trump on the shooting at the #WHCD... "But in light of this evening's events, I ask that all Americans recommit with their hearts and resolving our differences peacefully. We have to. We have to resolve our differences. I will say you… pic.twitter.com/G3u4NjzOAy — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Along with restating his disgust with the suspect as “a sick person, a very sick person,” the President stated yet again the necessity to denounce this attack on free speech and the need to reschedule because “we don’t want things like this to happen” and “we’re not going to let anybody take over our society” by “cancel[ing] things out”: President Trump denounces the #WHCD shooting as an attack on the First Amendment... "[W]e don't want things like this to happen. I think it's very important that I say, though, and I told the representatives of the evening -- they did such a beautiful job. It was such a… pic.twitter.com/5aQtTpzmvI — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Trump took a litany of questions, starting with White House Correspondents Association (WHCA) President Weijia Jiang of CBS: President Trump to @WHCA president/CBS correspondent @Weijia Jiang: “We'll do a couple, and then we go to the chief – Madam Chairman, I just want to say you did a fantastic job. What a beautiful evening. And we're going to reschedule. [APPLAUSE] And after that, it's very tough… pic.twitter.com/B5w9csVuNG — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Fox’s Peter Doocy was next and wondered if Trump had any thought as to “why,” concerning assassination attempts, “do you think this keeps happening to you.” Trump chalked it up to his impact and the unfortunate reality of how assassinated Presidents were those having “the biggest impact”: DOOCY TIME: “There's a report in the New York Post that this assailant assembled his weapon somewhere on site at the hotel. What do you think about that? And I ask respectfully, why do you think this keeps happening to you?” President Trump: “Well, you know, I've studied… pic.twitter.com/Sw0sCFL3HS — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Trump even let CNN host and former conservative reporter Kaitlan Collins have a go: CNN’s @KaitlanCollins: “Thank you for updating us on the suspect earlier. Were you aware of any threats or is your team aware of any threats beforehand? And do you believe you were the target of this tonight?” President Trump: “I guess, I mean, these people are they're crazy.… pic.twitter.com/py8T2EJSCU — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 A few reporters later, Agence France-Presse’s Danny Kemp asked if there’s a nexus to the war in Iran and then Politico’s Sophia Cai considered whether he’s been “concerned about” another Butler-type attempt on his life: AFP’s @DannyCTKemp: “Is there any indication that this – this shooting was could have been linked to the war in Iran?” President Trump: “I don't think so. But you never know. We're going to know a lot. We’ll – we have the best people in the world working on it. And we're going… pic.twitter.com/vNf24ePXc1 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 .@Politico’s @SophiaCai99: “Mr. President, there's a lot – there's – you as well as some of us who have covered Butler, experienced another horrific day two years ago. What – what felt similar? You know, you had the First Lady with you today. What felt different? And you have… pic.twitter.com/u8zhgOyCy7 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Fast-forwarding to the final two questions and NBC’s Garrett Haake had the most sobering: “[T]here’s been so much political violence not just aimed at yourself, but at other members of, you know, members of congress, state house speakers, you name it. Is that just the cost of doing business to do politics in America anymore? Well, what does that say about our country?...Is it possible to turn the temperature down, at this point?” NBC’s @GarrettHaake: “There's been so much political violence not just aimed at yourself, but at other members of, you know, members of congress, state house speakers, you name it. Is that just the cost of doing business to do politics in America anymore?” Trump: “Yeah.” Haake:… pic.twitter.com/LuDtOasw9C — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 The President answered in the affirmative while noting political violence is common in other parts of the world, such as South America, but he wouldn’t stop enacting his agenda on everything from the economy to taking out Iran. New York Post’s Steven Nelson also pulled on this big-picture thread and wondered if what happened would “impact you as a leader” and “change your leadership”: .@NYPost’s @StevenNelson10: “Do you know how the gun was brought into the hotel? And also, how does this event impact you as the leader of our country? Do you think it will change your leadership?” Trump: “I like not to think about it. I lead a pretty normal life, considering,… pic.twitter.com/z8sxTvmuz2 — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Trump stated in part he “like[s] to not think about it” and “handle it as well as…it can be handled” because “a lot of other people…become basket cases.” To see the relevant transcript from the April 25 briefing, click here.

Saturday night marked an unfathomable turn of events as, minutes after the beginning of dinner being served at the 2026 White House Correspondents Dinner (WHCD), a rabid gunman began shooting and attempted to breach the room. What normally serves as the White House Correspondents Association president’s last major act became a nightmare for its current title holder, CBS senior White House correspondent Weijia Jiang. But prior to and after the chaos, Jiang kept the audience and viewers abreast of the details and didn’t genuflect or overinflate the importance of this or that group in the Washington Hilton. Rather, she kept the focus on the necessity of everyone’s safety and how one person cannot dictate our lives. While we at NewsBusters never pull our punches when the elite media show us their deep-seated liberal bias on issue after issue and candidate after candidate, Jiang and many others showed their mettle Saturday as people when serious, life-altering moments happen. It seemed like a lifetime ago when, at 8:21 p.m. Eastern, Jiang took the stage for brief opening remarks, thanking the President and the First Lady for attending as well as Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt “for everything you and your team does to work with us every day, whether you like it or not.” Here @WHCA President @Weijia Jiang’s full opening remarks at the start of the #WHCD: “Good evening to everyone. President Trump, Madam First Lady, on behalf of the White House Correspondents Association. Thank you for being here. It is meaningful that you are with us tonight. And… pic.twitter.com/VtuRU5PwEC — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 She praised the White House beat without making it seem sanctimonious, acknowledging the reality that covering President Trump is “the biggest story in the world every single day” with “the speed…exhilarating, demanding, and…offer[ing] a crucial public service.” She thanked her CBS News bosses, the WHCA board, past WHCA President Kelly O’Donnell of NBC, “the mentors and other friends who have kept me balanced this year and always, and of course, to my family” who “are my calm and I love you.” Moments later, the shooting shattered the jovial mood and, as the President admitted later, a brutal roasting of the press he had lined up. Roughly 24 minutes after the shots rang out, Jiang returned to the dais with details what had hoped to be a resumption of the evening’s proceedings: CBS's @Weijia Jiang at 858pm Eastern on the #WHCD shooting: "We have an announcement. I know everyone's going to want as many details as possible. And right now, we don't have that. But I can tell you that our program is going to resume momentarily. And we will have more details… pic.twitter.com/lbJ1EyHFYu — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Jiang made her final address for the evening at 9:39 p.m. Eastern, revealing “law enforcement has requested that we leave the premises, consistent with protocol, and [the President] wanted to emphasize that nobody was hurt”: CBS correspondent and @WHCA President @Weijia Jiang announcing the #WHCD will be postponed following the shooting in the lobby: “This is a room full of reporters, so I know you've already seen the President's tweet -- my apologies, his post on Truth Social. And law enforcement… pic.twitter.com/MNJA0Rj44w — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Jiang then offered some levity and elicited some genuine laughter in divulging some more news: “He – the President – will be having a press briefing at the White House in 30 minutes. [LAUGHTER] That is not a joke – and he insists that we will reschedule this event in the next 30 days – [APPLAUSE] – that he wanted to do it tonight. He wanted to continue despite the news, but has to follow security protocol.” Once again, she spoke in awe of her colleagues, but definitely didn’t sound like how some other folks that frequent NewsBusters readers could probably fill in the blank with: I said earlier tonight that journalism is a public service because when there is an emergency, we run to the crisis, not away from it. And on a night when we are thinking about the freedoms in the First Amendment, we must also think about how fragile they are. I saw all of you reporting, and that’s what we do. [CHEERS AND APPLAUSE] So, thank God everybody is safe. And thank you for coming together tonight. We will do this again. Thank you. Prior to President Trump speaking in the White House Briefing Room, Jiang emotionally spoke on the phone during a CBS News Special Report about what was going through her mind when she addressed a shaken room of thousands (and millions watching elsewhere) (click “expand”): Well, what was going through my mind is my seven-year-old daughter was there, my husband was there, my parents were there. And it just is a huge reality check. And I think, you know, on a night where we all came together to celebrate the freedoms in the First Amendment, we also have to think about how fragile they are in this country because, you know, shootings and would-be shootings happen every day and it doesn't matter if it’s, you know, the White House Correspondents Dinner or anywhere else in this country. Nobody should have to feel that way. Nobody should have to feel scared to be anywhere in a public place. And that is not what this country is about, so I think that I was just pretty rattled because we were still waiting for more information and details. (….) This dinner is all about acknowledging how vital the First Amendment is to our democracy. So, every year, the Correspondents Association comes together to do that and honor award winners and scholarship recipients who want to be reporters like us. It’s also a chance for the press and the President to get together in a different context and recognize the important relationship, despite how complicated it might be. So, that’s what we were doing. And unfortunately, you know, this traumatic event unfolded and thank goodness everybody is safe. And that’s the most important thing out of all of this[.] Trump arrived at 10:33 p.m. Eastern and, following extensive remarks forcefully denouncing this attack on the press, himself, his Cabinet, and people inside the room representing every possible political ideology, let Jiang have the first question. “[W]e go to the chief. Madam Chairman, I just want to say you did a fantastic job. What a beautiful evening. And we’re going to reschedule. [APPLAUSE] And after that, it’s very tough for her to ask a killer question. Right. But you have done a fantastic job. Please,” Trump said. President Trump to @WHCA president/CBS correspondent @Weijia Jiang: “We'll do a couple, and then we go to the chief – Madam Chairman, I just want to say you did a fantastic job. What a beautiful evening. And we're going to reschedule. [APPLAUSE] And after that, it's very tough… pic.twitter.com/B5w9csVuNG — Curtis Houck (@CurtisHouck) April 26, 2026 Jiang still asked a question, focusing on how this was the third time Trump has faced Secret Service agents rushing towards him: As you mentioned, it all happened so quickly and I wonder, especially because unfortunately you have experience with these sorts of threats in that moment when you realize there was a threat and Service agents were telling us to get down. Can you describe what was going through your mind, how you were feeling in that moment? Trump even praised her for the “very good question, actually,” saying “it’s always shocking when something like this happens” and even he “thought it was a tray…going down.” He later said First Lady Melania Trump “was very cognizant, I think, of what happened” and “I think she knew immediately what happened…saying, that’s a bad noise.” Before going to Fox’s Peter Doocy, Trump emphasized both he and Jiang wanted the evening to resume, but understood the security concerns. In Trump fashion, he joked he had “the most inappropriate speech ever made” if the evening had gone on without the chaos and thus “I’ll be very boring next time”: And you wanted to too – you very much wanted to continue it because I don’t like to let these sick people, these thugs, these horrible, horrible people change the fabric of our life, change the course of what we do. So, we held out. You were there. We held out right till the end. But they didn’t want to take a chance. And I understand it was protocol, but we’re going to be doing one hopefully within the next 30 days or sooner. And I am ready, willing and able. And I was all set to really rip it. And I said to my people, this would be the most inappropriate speech ever made if I said – so I’ll have to save it. I don’t know if I can ever be as rough as I was going to be tonight. I think I’m going to be probably very nice. I’ll be very boring the next time, but we’re going to have a great event. And you did a fantastic job. Thank you very much.

During Friday’s Katy Tur Reports, the eponymous MS NOW host asked American Action Forum president Douglas Holtz-Eakins if the Iran war was a ploy to put the economy “into the gutter” to get the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates if the economy was in deep hurt, something she called “cheeky” but a “serious question.” Just 15 minutes later, after she said the crazy thing, she called on the Democratic Party to be the new party of common sense. The first main discussion focused on the drop of the DOJ investigation into Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, which focused on the overrun costs of Federal Reserve construction. The move made new Fed Chair Nominee, Kevin Warsh, likely to become the new chairman after Powell leaves at the end of his term after Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) threatened put up a roadblock if the Powell investigation continued.    MS NOW's Katy Tur asks if the Iran War is a ploy by Trump to get the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates. TUR: This is going to sound cheeky, but it's a serious question. Is he trying to drive the economy into the gutter in order to lower interest rates? pic.twitter.com/dKNGSxJh2h — Nick (@nspin310) April 24, 2026   After The Atlantic staff writer and MS NOW analyst Ashley Parker answer to a DOJ question, Tur turned to Holtz-Eakins to ask what she made sure to note was a “serious question”: This is going to sound cheeky, but it's a serious question. Is he trying to drive the economy into the gutter in order to lower interest rates, because the war in Iran is not doing good things for people's economic, personal prosperity? The unserious question continued: “I mean, the stock market's doing well. Yes, but people do not feel good if it keeps going this way. And oil keeps being held hostage on the streets, are we going to be in a position where interest rates will get lowered?” Holtz-Eakins’s answer completely avoided any talk of the Iran war being some sort of ploy, likely because he knew that was nowhere near the truth.   Just 15 minutes after she asked if the Iran War was a conspiracy to hurt the economy for lower interest rates, Tur called on the Democratic Party to become the party of common sense. https://t.co/QzZdvcDRZp pic.twitter.com/4uRVHQ4gqp — Nick (@nspin310) April 24, 2026   Just 15 minutes later, Parker and Lincoln Project member Stuart Stevens were panelists as Tur discussed Trump approval. Some of the panel discussions involved talk of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and how some of his ideas are insane, but others, like a push for healthy food are good and something Dems should not run away from After Parker talked about ICE, economics, and war, Tur had an idea for Democrats: “Yeah. And I wonder, Stu, if the real opportunity for a Democrat here is, or the party itself is to be the party of sanity, to be the party of common sense.” Tur continued as she listed her perfect party of common sense: Donald Trump and Republicans keep talking about common sense. Well, what about the Democrats coming in and saying, we're going to be, you know, sane about our immigration policy, both at the border and internally sane - and also not cruel. Sane about our food supply, saying about keeping Americans healthy. Sane about the economy. Sane about not going to war. Saying about what we tweet or post on Truth Social, just coming out and saying, we're going to promise you that we're going to be more - more down the middle - not down the middle necessarily, but just more sane, more common-sensical.  As she began to lose her thought, she implored to Stevens: “Take it away from me, please.” Tur ask of Democrats not to be insane was overshadowed by her stated conspiracy about the Iran war connection to the Federal Reserve and interest rates. If Tur does not want the party to be crazy, she should not say crazy things herself. The transcript is below. Click "expand": MS NOW’s Katy Tur Reports April 24, 2026 2:21:29 PM Eastern (...) KATY TUR: This is going to sound cheeky, but it's a serious question. Is he trying to drive the economy into the gutter in order to lower interest rates, because the war in Iran is not doing good things for people's economic - personal prosperity? I mean, the stock market's doing well. Yes, but people do not feel good if it keeps going this way, and oil keeps being held hostage on the Straits. Are we going to be in a position where interest rates will get lowered? (...) 2:37:20 PM Eastern TUR: Yeah. And I wonder, Stu, if the real opportunity for a Democrat here is, or the party itself is to be the party of sanity, to be the party of common sense.  Donald Trump and Republicans keep talking about common sense. Well, what about the Democrats coming in and saying, we're going to be, you know, sane about our immigration policy, both at the border and internally sane - and also not cruel. Sane about our food supply, saying about keeping Americans healthy. Sane about the economy. Sane about not going to war. Saying about what we tweet or post on Truth Social, just coming out and saying, we're going to promise you that we're going to be more - more down the middle - not down the middle necessarily, but just more sane, more common-sensical. Take it away from me. STUART STEVENS: Well, you know, back in the day when I worked for -  TUR: Take it away from me, please. (...)

This sounds like a joke. But the PBS News Hour is far softer in interviewing a spokesman for the terrorist group Hezbollah than they are with Israel, which they treat like a terrorist group. Hezbollah flack Wafiq Sada drew softballs from reporter Simona Foltyn on Tuesday, with the assumption that Israel was a malevolent force. On Thursday's News Hour, anchor Geoff Bennett pulled out rhetorical boxing gloves for Danny Danon, Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations. Danon received the old “how many deaths are acceptable” push, like Donald Trump got during the Covid pandemic. PBS anchor Geoff Bennett rips into Israel's UN ambassador: “When Israel targets Hezbollah in dense urban areas, as was the case here, how does it determine what level of civilian casualties is considered acceptable?” And: "We know that Hezbollah does indeed embed itself in… pic.twitter.com/wVmD1SFG1R — Tim Graham (@TimJGraham) April 25, 2026 The PBS host asked: “When Israel targets Hezbollah in dense urban areas, as was the case here, how does it determine what level of civilian casualties is considered acceptable?” Danon replied: “So, first, we try to minimize civilian casualties, period, unlike Hezbollah, who did exactly the opposite. They target communities.” They hide behind civilians, he said, like Hamas did in Gaza. Bennett acknowledged that, then repeated himself, but harsher: “To your point, we know that Hezbollah does indeed embed itself in civilian areas. So, how many civilian deaths per Hezbollah target is acceptable? Is it five? Is it 10? Is it 300? Or is there no ceiling at all?” PBS’s Foltyn did not ask her Hezbollah guest these questions, and even let him claim “Let us be clear and honest. Hezbollah's ethics and religion prohibits it from killing civilians.” Then it turned really feisty when Bennett relayed the claim that Israel’s targeting journalists for death in Lebanon:   PBS host Geoff Bennett is a callous JERK as he accuses Israel of targeting journalists for death. "What military objective is served by killing reporters?" Israel's UN Ambassador Danny Danon calls that not just a lie, but a "blood libel," which triggers Bennett into more snide… pic.twitter.com/IVyD9GyhFN — Tim Graham (@TimJGraham) April 25, 2026 BENNETT: The Lebanese journalist Amal Khalil was killed yesterday in an Israeli strike. Lebanon's prime minister responded by saying that Israel's targeting of journalists -- and this is a quote -- "is no longer isolated incidents, but has become an established approach." The Committee to Protect Journalists has documented a pattern of journalists killed by Israeli strikes. What military objective is served by killing reporters? DANON: Well, I beg to differ about your question. It's biased. With all due respect, we are not targeting reporters, period. Unfortunately, if you have reporters who are next to Hezbollah terrorists or Hezbollah bunkers or Hezbollah launchers, those incidents happen, and we regret that. But to accuse Israel that we target reporters, you know, that's a blood libel! You know, what are you actually implying, that we gather intelligence -- BENNETT:  Excuse me, sir. Excuse me -- DANON: -- that we gather intelligence -- BENNETT:  I take issue. I take issue. I take issue with that, sir. DANON:  -- and we actually want to kill reporters, and not to kill terrorists of Hezbollah? BENNETT: You say that Israel does not target journalists. Amal Khalil is dead. CPJ has documented a growing pattern of targeted Israeli attacks in Lebanon, where 15 journalists and media workers have been killed by Israel since the October 7 attacks. Your government continues to state that Israel does not target journalists. But my question is simple. At what number of dead journalists does that answer become one that the international community can no longer accept? At this point, Bennett is berating the guest as part of an immoral conspiracy to murder journalists. How do you remain calm and civil under this kind of assault? And how does PBS think they are some oasis of calm and rational discourse with this kind of junk? PBS president Paula Kerger goes around calling their network "educating and inspiring," and bringing the country together. What baloney.  Danon remains calm, but indignant, and Bennett keeps aggressively pushing:  DANON: Geoff, it's outrageous. When you say we target journalists, you imply that we have the intention to kill journalists, and that's a lie. You should ask the other questions. Where were those journalists during the time of the attack? Where they were spending their time? Maybe they were next to Hezbollah terrorists, and that's why they were in line of fire, unfortunately. BENNETT: Do you know that to be true? Do you know that to be true? DANON:  I will tell you one thing. BENNETT: Do you know that to be true, sir? DANON: We will focus our efforts -- BENNETT:  I’ll take that as a no. DANON:  -- our abilities, our intelligence, targeting Hezbollah terrorists, period. We are not doing it against civilians and for sure not against reporters. Bennett thanked Danon after all that abuse, and Danon returned the thank you. I think I would have had a different farewell message. "I hope you know you sound like you work for Hezbollah."