www.newsbusters.org
Today's Highlights: What MRC's Media Watchdogs Are Saying
MRC Watchdogs churn out breaking news on a daily basis. Don't miss Today's Highlights, where you can keep up with the top MRC content, whether it's the latest study on media bias, a glaring omission from the elitist media, or how the Big Tech companies are serving up the same leftist spin as the media.
Top Stories:
1)Trade Deficit Lowest in 5 Years, Thanks to Trump’s Tariffs - Media and Analysts Shocked
2) MRC Has Receipts: Wikipedia Cites Leftist Outlets Nearly 20x More Often than Right
3) Labeling Imbalance Persists at PBS After Trump Rescinded Federal Funding
4) Apple News Shows ONLY 1 Right-Leaning Outlet Out of 560 Articles Throughout November
5) Biden’s Immigration Debacle Is the Media’s, Too
1) Trade Deficit Lowest in 5 Years, Thanks to Trump’s Tariffs - Media and Analysts Shocked
Lowest Trade Deficit in Five Years: The Commerce Department reported that the U.S. goods and services trade deficit in September fell to $52.8 billion, the lowest monthly level since June 2020. This significant reduction shows that the trade strategy was effective in meeting the stated goal of narrowing the deficit.
Surge in Exports: The decrease in the deficit was driven primarily by a 3.0% increase in exports, which "dwarfed" the 0.6% rise in imports. Furthermore, the $289.3 billion value of exports was the second-highest monthly total on record, demonstrating a robust positive impact on U.S. sales abroad.
Media and Analyst Surprise (The "Unexpected" Outcome): The fact that analysts predicted the deficit would grow (to $62.5-$63.5 billion) and the media consistently used the word "unexpectedly" highlights that the positive result defied conventional economic wisdom and media pessimism regarding the tariff policy. Even typically critical outlets like The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal "begrudgingly" gave the administration credit for achieving its goal of balancing the deficit.
2) MRC Has Receipts: Wikipedia Cites Leftist Outlets Nearly 20x More Often than Right
Extreme Citation Imbalance: Wikipedia overwhelmingly favors left-leaning sources, citing them nearly 20 times more often than right-leaning outlets (5,320,017 citations vs. 292,250 citations). This data, compiled by MRC Free Speech America researchers across all languages, demonstrates a massive, systemic bias in the online encyclopedia's references.
Official Blacklist Mechanism: This citation disparity is not accidental, but a direct result of how Wikipedia operates. Its editors rely on a list of designated "reliable sources" that overwhelmingly approves left-wing media (like CNN and Mother Jones) while effectively restricting or banning right-of-center media, proving that the bias is built into the site's editorial policy.
Promotion of Specific Allegations: The biased citations result in Wikipedia pages actively promoting a leftist agenda and including specific, politically charged content. Examples provided in the article include claims of "white supremacist" views against Vice President JD Vance, blood libel accusations against Israel, and a "misinformation" jab placed on Charlie Kirk's page immediately after his assassination.
The figures remained uneven after President Trump signed the bill rescinding federal funding from PBS and NPR on July 24, with 11 variations of “far-right” labels and 2 of “far-left” ones. Overall, the post-July 24 labeling disparity was 17-9. (Note: Coverage of the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk began September 10, 2025, which may have skewed the post-July 24 raw figures somewhat toward balance.)
3) Labeling Imbalance Persists at PBS After Trump Rescinded Federal Funding
MRC analysts counted up the “left-wing” and “right-wing” style ideological labels used by anchors, reporters, and contributors on the PBS News Hour regarding American politics from December 1, 2024 through November 30, 2025. PBS News Weekend programs were not included.
PBS staff used 44 variations of "far-right" labels and only 4 of "far-left" labels, a ratio of 11:1.
PBS staff also used mere "right-wing" and "left-wing" labels at a disparity of 17-12. So overall, the labeling disparity was 61-16.
The figures remained uneven after President Trump signed the bill rescinding federal funding from PBS and NPR on July 24, with 11 variations of “far-right” labels and 2 of “far-left” ones. Overall, the post-July 24 labeling disparity was 17-9. (Note: Coverage of the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk began September 10, 2025, which may have skewed the post-July 24 raw figures somewhat toward balance.)
4) Apple News Shows ONLY 1 Right-Leaning Outlet Out of 560 Articles Throughout November
Apple News Delivers Stark Ideological Imbalance: Throughout November 2025, Apple News showcased only one right-leaning outlet (The Telegraph, a British source) in its top 20 daily stories—out of 560 articles reviewed—exposing a near-total blackout on conservative perspectives in a platform reaching millions of users.
Major U.S. Conservative Voices Silenced Despite Popularity: No prominent American right-leaning outlets like Fox News, Daily Mail, or New York Post cracked the top 20, even though they rank among the highest-traffic U.S. news sites—proving Apple News prioritizes curation over consumer demand.
Left-Leaning Dominance Floods the Feed: Radical leftist sources like Vox, The New Yorker, The Atlantic, and Vice overwhelmed the top slots, alongside staples like The Washington Post, NBC News, and Al Jazeera—turning Apple News into an echo chamber for progressive narratives.
Even Token Conservatism Is Locked Away: The solitary right-leaning article was buried behind an Apple News+ paywall, denying free users access and underscoring Big Tech's agenda to marginalize dissenting views—time to demand transparency and fairness for all.
5) Biden’s Immigration Debacle Is the Media’s, Too
Biden's Ideological Folly Ignored Warnings, Unleashing Chaos: Despite pre-election memos from top aides in August 2020 warning of a massive border surge from lax enforcement and pent-up demand, the administration's partisan push flooded the U.S. with millions of illegal immigrants—proving ideology and incompetence trumped common sense, as admitted by former ICE official Deborah Fleischaker: "I don’t think we ever recovered."
Mainstream Media's Delayed "Postgame" Coverage Betrayed the Public: Outlets like The New York Times buried the immigration crisis for years—treating it as yesterday's news only in late 2025—mirroring their silence on Biden's senility, leaving voters in the dark while conservative alarms rang unanswered and enabling Democratic denial until electoral disaster struck.
Abbott's Busing Genius Exposed Blue-State Hypocrisy: Texas Gov. Greg Abbott's strategic transport of tens of thousands of migrants to sanctuary cities like New York and Denver shattered Democrats' plan to dump the crisis on red states, forcing elite voters to face the consequences and marking the turning point where Biden's team lost the immigration debate for good.