Try our new LIPOSOMAL VITAMIN C - https://wearechange.shop/product/liposomal-vitamin-c/ Trump Just Got STUNNING Warnings from Top Generals — MASS RETALIATION Feared Highlights ⚠️ U.S. military buildup in the Middle East escalates significantly in 2025, signaling possible imminent conflict. ? Veteran generals and intelligence officials caution against rushing into war without considering long-term consequences. ? China and Russia condemn Israel’s strikes on Iran and warn the U.S. against deeper involvement. ☢️ UN officials warn of catastrophic nuclear contamination risks from attacks on Iranian nuclear plants. ? The narrative of a quick, easy strike is widely disputed by experts recalling past prolonged conflicts. ? Allegations suggest China may be covertly aiding Iran with missile fuel and military supplies. ?️ Calls for restraint contrast with aggressive warhawk voices demanding immediate action against Iran. Key Insights ⚔️ Military buildup signals strategic calculation, but long-term consequences remain unclear: The ongoing influx of heavy military transport aircraft and personnel into the Middle East indicates a serious preparation for potential conflict. Yet, as General Stanley McChrystal stresses, the “day after” scenario—i.e., managing fallout post-conflict—is inadequately considered, risking an unmanageable quagmire akin to past U.S. Middle Eastern engagements. Such foresight is critical to avoid repeat cycles of instability, mass migration, and economic disruption. ? Historical experience warns against expecting swift victory: Former General Wesley Clark’s cautionary remarks compare the expected conflict to the protracted NATO-Kosovo campaign, warning that Iran and affiliated groups are unlikely to capitulate quickly. This counters overly simplistic warhawk rhetoric promoting the idea of a quick strike. Historical precedent shows that entrenched conflicts in the region tend to escalate and extend rather than resolve rapidly. ☢️ Nuclear risks amplify s..