Big things are happening behind the scenes folks! Just as I keep telling you, we’re in the very beginning of everything, the calm before the storm. Just small little drips and drabs so far, but there is a ton happening behind the scenes that you don’t know about — but you soon will! Here is John Solomon to explain what he just learned: TRANSCRIPT: We’ve got some big news to get to tonight on a story we’ve been following since the middle of October. That is when House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan alleged that former CIA Director John Brennan lied to Congress and referred him to the Department of Justice for criminal prosecution. And today we’ve gotten reports that the DOJ is gearing up to issue multiple grand jury subpoenas relating to the DOJ’s investigation into Brennan. Chairman Jordan has already said on the record that Brennan allegedly made numerous willfully and intentionally false statements of material fact that were also contradicted by records established by the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence from the CIA. The statements in question revolve around the infamous and discredited Steele dossier that helped kick off the Russia collusion hoax, which we now know was entirely unmerited. We’ll keep you updated as we get more details on the possible grand jury subpoenas. Backup here if needed: John Brennan is on deck “The DOJ is gearing up to issue multiple grand jury subpoenas relating to the DOJ’s investigation into Brennan… The statements in question revolve around the infamous and discredited Steele Dossier that helped kick off the Russian collusion hoax.”… pic.twitter.com/sQxItV5Hlv — TheStormHasArrived (@TheStormRedux) November 6, 2025 And don’t forget about this: John Solomon: Obama Cannot “Plead The 5th” To Get Out of This It seems like every single day it gets worse and worse for Barack Hussein Obama. Like Haman from the Bible, it seems as though all the traps he set for President Trump over the past decade are now going off on him! Just a few hours ago we had this: BREAKING: FBI Director Kash Patel Has Now Found “Thousands” Of Trump–Russia Collusion Hoax Documents In “Burn Bags” In A Secret Room And now comes John Solomon who tells us all the legal experts he's talked to believe that Obama will be granted Presidential Immunity but that is a two-edged sword... Because of that immunity, he will lose the right to "plead the 5th" and therefore cannot dodge any question. Watch here: HOLEE SHIZZLES‼A TRAP IS SET! ? Obama Can now be summoned before a Grand Jury, but he CANNOT Plead the 5th because he has immunity from Prosecution “He HAS TO TELL THE TRUTH… if he lies as a private citizen about what he did as President, he will not longer have that… pic.twitter.com/xvWDiW0qT7 — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) July 30, 2025 TRANSCRIPT: Uh, I know President Trump has every right to be frustrated with him. I think President Trump's analysis last week was right. I think my immunity rule might protect him on the original charges. That's what most legal experts tell me — that that ruling is so sweeping it will protect Obama for what he did in office. However, Barack Obama can now be summoned before a grand jury. He cannot take the 5th Amendment because he has immunity from prosecution. He'll have to tell the truth. If he lies, as a private citizen, about what he did as president, he'll no longer have that immunity, and that is a trap that Obama is sitting, potentially facing. And I wanna say, the irony to that — because on January 5th, 2017, he presided over a meeting in the White House where the FBI had just cleared Mike Flynn of any wrongdoing, and they schemed in that meeting how they might be able to jam up Mike Flynn. And they came up with the idea, "We'll lure him into an interview, catch him in a lie, and then prosecute him that way." Barack Obama now is about to face a potential similar situation as the one he created unfairly for Mike Flynn. With all due respect to John Solomon's excellent reporting and all the legal experts he's talked to, I completely disagree with the first part of their conclusion. I do not believe the Supreme Court ruling on Presidential Immunity is so broad that it goes beyond "official acts".  That's complete nonsense. We'll see who's right over time, your humble correspondent Noah or all the "legal experts"...but I think I'm winning this one. More here: UPDATE: President Obama Does NOT Have Immunity For RussiaGate — TWO Reasons! Yesterday, I brought you this report completely debunking the idea that Barack Hussein Obama could claim Presidential Immunity for his treasonous coup against President Trump. In case you missed it: No — Of Course Barack Obama Does NOT Have “Presidential Immunity” For RussiaGate In that report, I focused on the fact that Obama cannot legally claim Presidential Immunity for anything outside the scope of "Official Acts" of the Presidency. And certainly spying on a campaign, fabricating evidence, weaponizing the DOJ, and everything else he did is FAR outside the scope of "Official Acts". So any immunity claim fails on those grounds. And I think that's the clearest and easiest way to strike down ANY claim of Presidential Immunity surrounding RussiaGate/ObamaGate. But now Mike Davis adds a second angle that is also strong. Davis points out you don't get immunity for anything done after you leave office, which means anything from January 2017 until now is completely unprotected by immunity: ?BREAKING: Mike Davis explains that Obama does NOT have Presidential Immunity on Russia hoax. Says all co-conspirators remain within the statute of limitations and can be charged under an ongoing criminal conspiracy. Davis then goes scorched earth saying everyone involved… pic.twitter.com/UPWh75n2OA — Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 21, 2025 BREAKING: Mike Davis explains that Obama does NOT have Presidential Immunity on Russia hoax. Says all co-conspirators remain within the statute of limitations and can be charged under an ongoing criminal conspiracy. Davis then goes scorched earth saying everyone involved should be terrified and that justice is coming: "Presidential immunity covers his actions while he's president, not when he's the former president. When he's participating in the coverup of this conspiracy, he doesn't have presidential immunity." "They say we are well beyond the statute of limitations, you're not. This is an ongoing criminal conspiracy. In order for the conspiracy to stop, you have to disavow it." "They are still covering up the conspiracy and perjuring themselves. We saw perjury by high ranking Obama officials. We are well within the statutes of limitations." "To these democrats, justice is coming. I'd be very scared. The Bureau of prisons will have plenty of space." So if anyone (including President Trump) tells you Obama will just claim Presidential Immunity, kindly show them this article. For more on why I think President Trump said that, read this: No -- Of Course Barack Obama Does NOT Have "Presidential Immunity" For RussiaGate There has been a lot swirling around online today about how even if Barack Obama did do everything Tulsi Gabbard has exposed, it won't matter because he has "Presidential Immunity". Like this: #BREAKING: President Trump says that Barack Obama has FULL IMMUNITY regarding the Russia hoax. pic.twitter.com/PoVZVMrs2z — SANTINO (@MichaelSCollura) July 25, 2025 And this: Trump says Obama has immunity for what he did in the Russia Hoax and he is likely right. I said this a few days ago and people didn't like it. pic.twitter.com/xVnw3pd3AE — Shawn Farash (@Shawn_Farash) July 25, 2025 To be fair, President Trump himself said Obama likely has immunity as you can see in the clip above, so everyone parroting that is simply parroting President Trump. But it's a good thing you have me to set this all straight. SHORT ANSWER: that's complete nonsense! And I'll tell you why... Yes, it's true that the Supreme Court did grant President Trump wide-ranging Presidential Immunity in that landmark Supreme Court case last year, but that is not a blank check to do whatever you want. Even though that Supreme Court ruling was very broad based, it still has boundaries, and those boundaries are that it only applies to "Official Acts" of the office. In other words, you can't shoot someone while you're President and claim Presidential Immunity, it doesn't work like that. So why would President Trump say it? Because he's the absolute master at misdirection! He gets you complacent when you should be very worried, and he agitates you when you should be complacent. It's classic Sun Tzu "Art of War" 101. And that's exactly what I think he's doing here, classic misdirection to Obama and to the MSM, meanwhile he's about to spring the trap! It's basic Constitutional Law that you don't get immunity outside of "Official Acts" and spying on your opponent's campaign, weaponizing the DOJ to fabricate evidence that goes directly against the real intelligence that had, and trying to frame your political opponent for something you know they did not do is so far from "Official Acts" it's laughable. And no, we don't have to prove Obama's actions meet the definition of "Treason" in order for Presidential Immunity to apply.  Those are two separate issues and entirely mutually independent of each other. Whether he committed Treason (or a myriad of other crimes) is one issue. Whether he can claim Presidential Immunity is an entirely separate different issue. I always like to Fact-Check my own work, so I went to ChatGPT and ran all of this through the AI, and the AI confirmed EXACTLY what I just told you: What Did the Supreme Court Say About Presidential Immunity? The Court said a President has broad immunity for “official acts” done while in office. An official act means something the President is allowed to do as part of their job—like signing bills, appointing judges, or giving military orders. The Court also said a President does NOT have immunity for unofficial or private acts—things outside their job. Can a President Claim Immunity for Crimes Like Murder? No.If a President shot someone in the street, that’s not part of their job.That’s a crime, not an official duty. Immunity doesn’t cover that. So the short answer: Presidential Immunity only applies to official acts, not personal crimes or things outside the job. How Do Courts Decide What’s “Official”? They look at the nature of the act, not the President’s motive. If the act is something only the President can do under the Constitution or law, it might be considered “official.” But if the act is just political dirty tricks, campaign work, or personal gain, that’s not official. Your Hypothetical: President Spies, Frames a Rival, Orders DOJ to Fake Reports Spying on a rival’s campaign and creating fake evidence is not a lawful duty of the President. The President cannot order DOJ to break the law or make up reports. That’s abusing power for personal or political reasons. Even if it doesn’t count as “treason,” it’s still illegal and outside legitimate presidential duties. Could the President claim immunity? They might try, arguing “I was directing the DOJ—part of my job.” But the courts would likely say: You crossed the line. Making DOJ do fake investigations is not an official function. It’s a crime and an abuse of power. Therefore, immunity would not apply. Bottom Line Official acts = broad protection. Personal crimes, political sabotage, or corrupt acts = no immunity. In your scenario, the President almost certainly would not be immune, because the actions are criminal and outside the lawful duties of the office.