100percentfedup.com
President Trump Scores BIG Supreme Court SNAP Victory — Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Hands Him The Win!
President Trump just scored ANOTHER massive victory from the Supreme Court.
I believe that puts his streak up to 29 wins in 9 months?
Incredible.
Take a look:
BREAKING — SUPREME COURT SIDES WITH TRUMP: Rules the administration does NOT have to pay out SNAP during the government shutdown for now
Good!
SNAP is RIFE with fraud. Time for MASSIVE changes to the program, and no more dessert cakes, sugary junk, luxury coffee, etc pic.twitter.com/PBpXSRfiS2
— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) November 8, 2025
Even more incredible is the fact that Far-Left Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was the Justice who issued the Order.
Let’s just say liberals are not handling this well:
Ketanji Brown Jackson was the judge who approved Trump’s appeal to withhold SNAP payments during the government shutdown.
Liberals on TikTok are having a meltdown pic.twitter.com/COEDUWBqI0
— Digital Gal (@DigitalGal_X) November 8, 2025
CNN shared more details:
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that required the Trump administration to cover full food stamp benefits for tens of millions of Americans in November, siding with the administration on a short-term basis in a legal fight that has quickly become a defining confrontation of the government shutdown.
The upshot is that the US Department of Agriculture will not have to immediately honor a lower court order that required it to transfer $4 billion to the key food assistance program by the end of the day. The decision, while temporary, could put at risk the full benefits for millions of Americans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, to feed themselves and their families.
The order does not resolve the underlying legal questions raised by the case – and the Trump administration has already committed to using the program’s contingency fund to partially pay benefits. Rather, Jackson’s “administrative stay” freezes any additional action by the administration to give an appeals court additional time to review the case.
Jackson is the justice assigned to handle emergency appeals from the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals.
The legal fight over food stamps has emerged as a central pressure point between all three branches during the historically long government shutdown because it is one of the easiest to understand and most tangible impacts of that impasse so far. At stake is food assistance that nearly 42 million Americans rely on.
It’s unclear how the case will ultimately impact the billions of dollars spent in federal SNAP funding.
The true irony here is that while the Left shouts “No Kings” that’s exactly what they wanted…
The Left has been using “Kings” disguised as Activist District Court Judges to impose their will on the entire nation.
The only problem?
The Supreme Court keeps telling them that’s Unconstitutional.
No Kings indeed.
Here is the full Court Order:
And that may be a bit hard to read so here is the full text:
Supreme Court of the United StatesNo. 25A539
BROOKE L. ROLLINS,SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, ET AL.,v.RHODE ISLAND STATE COUNCIL OF CHURCHES, ET AL.
O R D E R
The applicants are seeking a stay of two orders of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island, case No. 1:25-cv-569. See D. Ct. Minute Entry (Oct. 31, 2025) and Docket Number 34 (Nov. 6, 2025). These orders require the applicants to fully fund benefits for the Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (“SNAP”) for the month of November, and to distribute that funding by the end of the day on November 7, 2025 (today).
Earlier today, the applicants asked the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit to stay the District Court’s orders pending appeal, and to issue an administrative stay to facilitate its consideration of that stay motion. At 6:08 p.m., the First Circuit denied the applicants’ request for an administrative stay, but stated that it “intend[s] to issue a decision on [the stay pending appeal] motion as quickly as possible.” Rhode Island State Council of Churches v. Rollins, No. 25-2089 (CA1 Nov. 7, 2025).
The applicants filed an application in this Court this evening, requesting a stay of the two District Court orders “pending the disposition of the government’s appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and, if the court of appeals affirms those orders, pending the timely filing and disposition of a petition for a writ of certiorari in this Court.” Application at 1. The applicants assert that, without intervention from this Court, they will have to “transfer an estimated $4 billion by tonight” to fund SNAP benefits through November. Ibid.
Given the First Circuit’s representations, an administrative stay is required to facilitate the First Circuit’s expeditious resolution of the pending stay motion.
IT IS ORDERED that the District Court’s orders are hereby administratively stayed pending disposition of the motion for a stay pending appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in case No. 25-2089 or further order of the undersigned or of the Court. This administrative stay will terminate forty-eight hours after the First Circuit’s resolution of the pending motion, which the First Circuit is expected to issue with dispatch.
/s/ Ketanji Brown JacksonAssociate Justice of the Supreme Courtof the United States
Dated this 7thday of November, 2025.