Remember the Subway Sandwich thrower? Of course you do. This guy: DC Grand Jurors Refuse to Indict Ex-DOJ Staffer for Assaulting Border Agent | The National Pulse WHAT HAPPENED: Federal prosecutors failed to secure a felony assault indictment against a former Department of Justice (DOJ) employee who pelted a federal agent with a sandwich.… pic.twitter.com/ZyHbfa5bgO — Owen Gregorian (@OwenGregorian) August 28, 2025 You also probably remember how he was Acquitted a few weeks ago and then gave this pompous Press Conference… Full report here: ABSURD Jury Verdict Reached For the “Subway Sandwich Thrower” Now today we finally learn the answer to the question we are all asking... How could a jury not convict someone so obviously caught on camera assaulting a police officer? The short answer? They apparently treated the whole thing as a mockery, laughing all the way through the trial: LAUGHING MATTER: Jurors who deliberated on the case of a man who threw a sub sandwich at a U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer in Washington, D.C., said the courtroom was often filled with giggles as witnesses testified and lawyers bantered.https://t.co/iM4eSI7zeg — Fox News (@FoxNews) December 8, 2025 I don't know about you, but I don't find anything funny about it. And I'm SO SICK of the double-standards! You have grandmothers who did nothing more than show up and pray on the Capitol Steps on January 6th sent to prison for years, and this guy literally assaults a federal officer by throwing something at him and that's perfectly fine? It's not about whether the sandwich could have caused actual harm, you simply are not allowed to throw anything at federal officers.  Period. This jury thought the trial was a joke, but it turns out the JURY was the real joke. Here's more, from Fox News: One juror told CBS News that many in the packed courtroom struggled to keep a "straight face" during the proceedings. The accused, Sean Dunn, was ultimately acquitted on his misdemeanor charge of simple assault. "I mean," the juror said, "it was a thrown sandwich." "I thought we'd be out of there quickly. This case had no 'grounding.' He threw a sandwich at the agent because he knew it wouldn't hurt," another juror said. "A reasonable person wouldn't think a sandwich is a weapon." "It seemed to me like an open and closed type of thing," a third juror told the outlet. "It was kind of ridiculous." "We asked each other: If we only look at this case, can someone really do harm to someone wearing a ballistic vest by throwing a sandwich?" The trial lasted three days, and jurors deliberated for seven hours before handing down a verdict on Nov. 6. After it was read, Dunn hugged his lawyers in the courtroom. Really bad move by this Jury. Disgusting.