The University of Oklahoma just ruled in favor of a student who was ridiculously given a failing grade on a paper for using the Bible to defend the fact that there are only two genders. 20-year-old junior psychology major Samantha Fulnecky appealed the failure with the school, who sided with her on the matter. Not only that, but the teaching assistant who flunked her — a transgender man pretending to be a woman named Mel Curth — has now been relieved of his instructional duties. Here are the details: BREAKING: University of Oklahoma STRIKES DOWN transgender teacher who gave Christian student Samantha Fulnecky a ZERO on a paper that cited the Bible for gender roles. The university has STRIPPED instructor Mel Curth of teaching duties. VICTORY! pic.twitter.com/vJZJm6UKDy — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) December 22, 2025 The University of Oklahoma confirms that Mel Curth, the teaching assistant who gave a student a failing grade on a psychology essay, will no longer be teaching. pic.twitter.com/DAF8vFYFLk — Pop Base (@PopBase) December 23, 2025   Here’s the full statement from the University of Oklahoma: A statement from the University of Oklahoma: pic.twitter.com/FzcjByOjpp — University of Oklahoma (@UofOklahoma) December 22, 2025 In case that text is too small to read, here’s the full statement: A student’s claim of religious discrimination on an individual assignment in an online Psychology Course taught by a graduate teaching assistant has come to resolution. As stated previously, the student followed two available processes at the University: the grade appeals process in the college and she made a formal claim of illegal religious discrimination. As already announced, the grade appeal was decided in favor of the student, removing the assignment completely from the student’s total point value of the class, resulting in no academic harm to the student. The claim for discrimination has been investigated and concluded. The University does not release findings from such investigations. At the same time of the investigation, the Provost—the University’s highest ranking academic officer— and the academic Dean reviewed the full facts of the matter. Based on an examination of the graduate teaching assistant’s prior grading standards and patterns, as well as the graduate teaching assistant’s own statements related to this matter, it was determined that the graduate teaching assistant was arbitrary in the grading of this specific paper. The graduate teaching assistant will no longer have instructional duties at the University. Because this matter involves both student and faculty rights, the University has engaged in repeated and detailed conversations with the Faculty Senate Executive Committee to ensure there is an understanding of the facts, the process, and the actions being taken. The University of Oklahoma believes strongly in both its faculty’s rights to teach with academic freedom and integrity and its students’ right to receive an education that is free from a lecturer’s impermissible evaluation standards. We are committed to teaching students how to think, not what to think. The University will continue to review best practices to ensure that its instructors have the comprehensive training necessary to objectively assess their students’ work without limiting their ability to teach, inspire, and elevate our next generation. The New York Post provided excerpts from Fulnecky’s essay — and the feedback she received from the now-fired transgender teaching assistant: The assignment asked students to write a 650-word response to an academic article examining whether conformity to gender norms was associated with popularity or bullying among middle school students. In the essay, Fulnecky argues that she doesn’t believe that there are more than two genders because “that is how God made us.” “Society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders and everyone should be whatever they want to be is demonic and severely harms American youth,” Fulnecky wrote. “I live my life based on this truth and firmly believe that there would be less gender issues and insecurities in children if they were raised knowing that they do not belong to themselves, but they belong to the Lord,” she added. In her feedback to the student, Curth said that she neglected to address the prompt and relied more on “personal ideology” than “empirical evidence.” She also said that Fulnecky’s assertions were “at times offensive.” “To call an entire group of people ‘demonic’ is highly offensive, especially a minoritized population,” Curth wrote, before nitpicking the slew of contradictions in Fulnecky’s essay. “You can say that strict gender norms don’t create gender stereotypes, but that isn’t true by definition of what a stereotype is. Please note that acknowledging gender stereotypes does not immediately denote a negative connotation, a nuance this article discusses,” she added. This is a huge slap in the face to the woke mind virus that has been plaguing college campuses. The tide is truly turning. Take a look at some of these responses: If you can’t even acknowledge basic biological reality, you have no business being a college professor. — The Conservative Alternative (@OldeWorldOrder) December 22, 2025 Good. If a student can cite modern gender ideology, they can cite the Bible. Grading should be about the quality of the argument, not punishing Christianity or enforcing someone’s politics. — rowdyamerican (@rowdyamerican69) December 22, 2025 Finally some accountability in the Universities — Erik J Smits (@ErikJSmits) December 22, 2025 Your thoughts?