Judge Boasberg BLOCKS DOJ Investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Judge Boasberg BLOCKS DOJ Investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell

Rogue left-wing activist Judge James Boasberg is at it again. Today, he blocked U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro from investigating Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell. Specifically, he tossed out two grand jury subpoenas for records on the ballooning costs of Powell’s Federal Reserve renovations project. The DOJ plans to appeal the ridiculous ruling. Watch what U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro had to say in response here: BREAKING: US Attorney Jeanine Pirro just announced activist Judge Boasberg has BLOCKED a Grand Jury from investigating the Federal Reserve Pirro says this block is TOTALLY ILLEGAL. THE HOUSE NEEDS TO START IMPEACHING THESE ACTIVIST JUDGES. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! "As a result,… pic.twitter.com/7a5yz7sM4P — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) March 13, 2026 BREAKING: US Attorney Jeanine Pirro just announced activist Judge Boasberg has BLOCKED a Grand Jury from investigating the Federal Reserve Pirro says this block is TOTALLY ILLEGAL. THE HOUSE NEEDS TO START IMPEACHING THESE ACTIVIST JUDGES. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! “As a result, Jerome Powell today is now bathed in IMMUNITY preventing my office from investigating the federal reserve. This is wrong, and it is WITHOUT legal authority.” Pirro also released this statement on X: The American public is fed up with taxpayer money that goes into an unaccountable black hole. Today, an activist judge in Washington, D.C. has bathed Jerome Powell in immunity by taking the tool of a grand jury subpoena away from our ability to investigate the Federal Reserve.… pic.twitter.com/u6StlBURIu — US Attorney Pirro (@USAttyPirro) March 13, 2026 The American public is fed up with taxpayer money that goes into an unaccountable black hole. Today, an activist judge in Washington, D.C. has bathed Jerome Powell in immunity by taking the tool of a grand jury subpoena away from our ability to investigate the Federal Reserve. The Department of Justice will appeal. In his ruling, Judge James Boasberg claimed Pirro had “no evidence” to justify an investigation. CBS News reported: A federal judge has quashed a pair of grand jury subpoenas sent to the Federal Reserve Board as part of a criminal probe by U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro’s office, saying they were merely a pretext to pressure Chairman Jerome Powell into voting for lower interest rates or resigning. “There is abundant evidence that the subpoenas’ dominant (if not sole) purpose is to harass and pressure Powell either to yield to the President or to resign and make way for a Fed Chair who will. On the other side of the scale, the Government has offered no evidence whatsoever that Powell committed any crime other than displeasing the President,” Chief Judge James Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia wrote in his ruling, which was dated March 11 and unsealed on Friday. “The Court must thus conclude that the asserted justifications for these subpoenas are mere pretexts.” In January, Powell revealed that the Federal Reserve had received grand jury subpoenas from the Justice Department as part of an ongoing criminal investigation into him. The subpoenas threatened a criminal indictment related to Powell’s testimony before the Senate Banking Committee in June 2025, according to Powell. The chairman — who has drawn President Trump’s ire for declining to rapidly slash interest rates — said the probe centered on his comments about a years-long renovation project at the Federal Reserve’s office buildings. The investigation has not resulted in any criminal charges. Pirro said at a news conference that the Justice Department will appeal Boasberg’s decision. No evidence? How about the fact that the renovations project budget has somehow escalated by approximately a billion dollars? We, the American taxpayers, deserve to know where all our money is going! This is judicial corruption, pure and simple. Exactly this: If a judge can block investigations into the Federal Reserve, Americans should be asking serious questions. No one should be above oversight — not politicians, not bureaucrats, and definitely not the Fed. Transparency and accountability matter.