Election integrity??? What if I told you that a slew of Democrats just came out AGAINST election integrity as it was recently put forward by President Trump? But then imagine I told you that a slew of Democrats came out IN FAVOR of election integrity. Which one is more believable?  Which one would you immediately assume couldn’t POSSIBLY be true? Can BOTH be true?  (This is American politics we’re talking about, after all.) It turns out even Congressional Democrats will agree that election integrity is a good thing — until they don’t. Here’s the story: Not only did that ‘slew of Democrats’ just come out verbally attacking President Trump’s recent actions designed to ensure US election integrity. But they are officially calling on the Postmaster General of the US Postal Service to ignore the President of the United States, and actively work AGAINST his push for secure elections! Every Democrat that makes up the NJ Congressional delegation put their signature on a letter to the Postmaster General, pushing to that end. That letter was in direct opposition to this executive order, signed by President Trump just over a week ago: "We want to have honest voting in our country because if you don't have honest voting, you can't have really a nation." President Donald J. Trump signs an executive order combating several election integrity issues, including inaccurate voter rolls and vote-by-mail fraud. pic.twitter.com/fax2dnXHwj — The White House (@WhiteHouse) March 31, 2026 The signing of that order essentially makes absolutely sure that only US citizens vote in US elections. It mandates cross-referencing voter rolls and makes prosecuting election fraud a much bigger priority. But here’s where the Democrats (and multiple blue states which are now bringing lawsuits, which we’ll get to shortly…) are really losing their minds, because they think they’ll get a legal win here. Probably because so many rogue judges have been willing to do so! What the President did will lock down the truly necessary (think members of the military, etc) mail-in/absentee ballots by creating a system of standards and tracking protocols for the US Postal Service. In other words, NO MORE MAIL-IN / ABSENTEE VOTER FRAUD! Before we get into the letter from the Democrats calling on USPS to revolt, here’s the full Executive Order for anyone who wants to dive in — as found on the White House website: By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 20901 et seq.), the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20501 et seq.), and the Federal Government’s constitutional obligation to guarantee a republican form of Government to every State in the Union, U.S. Const. Art. IV, Sec. 4, it is hereby ordered: Section 1. Purpose and Policy. The right to vote in Federal elections is reserved exclusively for citizens of the United States under the Constitution and Federal law. Federal statutes explicitly prohibit non-citizens from registering to vote or voting in Federal elections and impose criminal penalties for violations. (18 U.S.C. 241; 18 U.S.C. 611; 18 U.S.C. 1015; and 52 U.S.C. 20511). The Social Security Administration (SSA) maintains records that, in conjunction with the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program under 42 U.S.C. 1320b-7, can assist in verifying identity and Federal election voter eligibility. The Federal Government has an unavoidable duty under Article II of the Constitution of the United States to enforce Federal law, which includes preventing violations of Federal criminal law and maintaining public confidence in election outcomes. To enhance election integrity via the United States Mail, additional measures are necessary. Secure ballot envelope identifiers provide a reliable, auditable mechanism to enforce Federal law without unduly burdening or infringing on the rights of eligible voters. Unique ballot envelope identifiers, such as bar codes, enable confirmation that only citizens receive and cast ballots, reducing the risk of fraud and protecting the integrity of Federal elections. Sec. 2. Establishment and Transmission of State Citizenship Lists and Prioritization of Investigations and Prosecutions Related to Election Fraud. (a) To the extent feasible and consistent with applicable law, including but not limited to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), the Secretary of Homeland Security, through the Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and in coordination with the Commissioner of SSA, shall take appropriate action to compile and transmit to the chief election official of each State a list of individuals confirmed to be United States citizens who will be above the age of 18 at the time of an upcoming Federal election and who maintain a residence in the subject State (State Citizenship List). The State Citizenship List shall be derived from Federal citizenship and naturalization records, SSA records, SAVE data, and other relevant Federal databases. The State Citizenship List shall be updated and transmitted to State election officials no fewer than 60 days before each regularly scheduled Federal election, or promptly upon request by a State in connection with any special Federal election. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish procedures to (i) allow individuals to access their individual records as well as to update or correct them in advance of elections; and (ii) enable States to routinely supplement and provide suggested modifications or amendments to the State Citizenship List transmitted thereto. An individual’s identification on the State Citizenship List does not indicate that the individual has been properly registered to vote in the State. State and Federal laws and State procedures must still be followed for an individual to be registered to vote. There may be State laws, not reflected in the State Citizenship List, that preclude voter registration, or the individual may choose not to be registered. (b) For purposes of this order, an individual is “eligible to vote in a Federal election” if the individual is a citizen of the United States, 18 years of age or older by the date of the upcoming election, and otherwise qualified under the laws of his or her State. The Attorney General shall prioritize the investigation and, as appropriate, the prosecution of State and local officials or any others involved in the administration of Federal elections who issue Federal ballots to individuals not eligible to vote in a Federal election, including under 18 U.S.C. 2(a), 18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 371, 18 U.S.C. 611(a), 18 U.S.C. 1001, 18 U.S.C. 1015, 52 U.S.C. 10307, and 52 U.S.C. 20511. Similarly, the Attorney General shall prioritize the investigation and, as appropriate, the prosecution of individuals and public or private entities engaged in, or aiding and abetting, the printing, production, shipment, or distribution of ballots to individuals who are not eligible to vote in a Federal election. Sec. 3. United States Postal Service Rulemaking on Mail-In and Absentee Ballots. (a) The unlawful use of the mail in connection with elections is prohibited by various Federal statutes, including 18 U.S.C. 1341, 18 U.S.C. 1708, 52 U.S.C. 10307, and 52 U.S.C. 20511. (b) To ensure the faithful execution of Federal law, protect the integrity of the mail as a medium for transmitting Federal election ballots and establish uniform standards for mail-in or absentee ballot services implemented through the United States Postal Service (USPS), the Postmaster General is hereby directed to initiate a proposed rulemaking pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 401 and other applicable authority within 60 days of the date of this order. The notice of proposed rulemaking shall include, at minimum, the following: (i) Proposed provisions specifying that all outbound ballot mail must be mailed in an envelope that: (A) is marked as Official Election Mail, including through designated markings provided by USPS for this purpose, such as the Official Election Mail logo, as necessary and appropriate; (B) is automation-compatible and bears a unique Intelligent Mail barcode, or successor USPS technology, that facilitates tracking and is consistent with the other requirements of this section; and (C) has undergone a mail envelope design review by the USPS to ensure compliance with USPS mailing standards, including barcode placement. (ii) Proposed provisions specifying that, no fewer than 90 days prior to a Federal election, any State may choose to notify the USPS if it intends to allow for mail-in or absentee ballots to be transmitted by the USPS. As part of that notification, any notifying State should further indicate whether it intends to submit to the USPS, no fewer than 60 days before the election, a list of voters eligible to vote in a Federal election in such State to whom the State intends to provide a mail-in or absentee ballot to be transmitted via the USPS. (iii) Proposed provisions specifying that the USPS shall not transmit mail-in or absentee ballots from any individual unless those individuals have been enrolled on a State-specific list described in subsection (b)(iv) of this section with the USPS pursuant to this subsection. (iv) Proposed provisions specifying that the USPS shall provide each State with a list of individuals (Mail-In and Absentee Participation List) who are enrolled with the USPS, pursuant to a process specified in the rulemaking directed by this subsection, for mail-in or absentee ballots provided by such State, along with unique ballot envelope identifiers, such as bar codes, for mail-in or absentee ballots provided to such individuals. The preparation and transmission of each State-specific Mail-In and Absentee Participation List shall comply with the Privacy Act and all applicable use agreements. (v) Proposed procedures enabling each State to routinely supplement and provide suggested modifications or amendments to the State’s Mail-In and Absentee Participation List in advance of any Federal election, consistent with applicable State law. (c) The USPS shall coordinate with the USPS Office of Inspector General and the Department of Justice for investigation of suspected unlawful use of the mail involving Federal election materials. (d) Any final rule pursuant to this section shall be issued no later than 120 days from the date of this order. Sec. 4. Implementation. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, the Commissioner of SSA, and the Postmaster General shall coordinate with the Secretary of Commerce in effectuating all relevant aspects of the implementation of this order. (b) The Attorney General shall enforce compliance with the applicable Federal statutes referenced herein and provide guidance to election officials, including any instrumentalities thereof; contractors; individuals involved in the administration of Federal elections; or public or private entities engaged in the printing, production, shipment, or distribution of ballots. (c) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall, within 90 days of the date of this order, establish the infrastructure necessary to compile, maintain, and transmit the State Citizenship List described in section 2(a) of this order, and shall designate a point of contact within DHS to receive and process requests from individuals and State election officials regarding the relevant State Citizenship List. The Commissioner of SSA shall provide all necessary citizenship and identity data to the Secretary of Homeland Security in support of this requirement, consistent with applicable law, the Privacy Act, and all applicable use agreements. Sec. 5. Enforcement. The Attorney General and the heads of executive departments and agencies (agencies) with relevant authority shall take all lawful steps to deter and address noncompliance with Federal law, including withholding Federal funds from noncompliant States and localities where such withholding is authorized by law. Evidence of violations of existing Federal laws by State or local election officials; States or localities, including any instrumentalities thereof; contractors; individuals involved in the administration of Federal elections; or public or private entities engaged in the printing, production, shipment, or distribution of ballots may be referred to the Department of Justice for consideration of investigation or charges under 18 U.S.C. 2(a), 18 U.S.C. 241, 18 U.S.C. 371, 18 U.S.C. 611(a), 18 U.S.C. 1001, 18 U.S.C. 1015, 52 U.S.C. 10307, and 52 U.S.C. 20511. States and localities should preserve, for a 5-year period, all records and materials — excluding ballots cast — evidencing voter participation in any Federal election (e.g., ballot envelopes, regardless of carrier). Sec. 6. Severability. If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any agency, person, or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any other agencies, persons, or circumstances shall not be affected thereby. Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect: (i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or (ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. (b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. (c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. DONALD J. TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE, March 31, 2026. And before I forget, I want to explain my opening “what if I told you” statements. Are Democrats FOR or AGAINST election integrity? Apparently, that depends what day of the week it is — and whether or not you mean REAL election integrity. Check out these quotes from less than two weeks ago, highlighting Democrats AGREEING with basic election integrity… only to vote against it: Republican and Democrat voters across America want voter ID. Supposedly, these Senate Democrats did too, until they voted against it. pic.twitter.com/1k0SMbElyy — Senate Republicans (@SenateGOP) April 8, 2026 Admittedly, Gallego from Arizona and Warnock from Georgia weren’t directly part of this letter sent by NJ Congressmen to the USPS. But it just goes to show you how easy it is to LIE for the CAMERA, and then vote pro-corruption in order to retain power. Our slew of NJ Democrats didn’t just vote against election integrity legislation backed by President Trump — now they’re openly telling the head of a federal entity to go against President Trump’s executive order. Here’s the full text of that letter, as shared on the US House website: Dear Postmaster General Steiner We write to condemn the Administration’s unlawful executive order seeking to seize states’ constitutional authority over its elections. The Constitution is very clear: authority over the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections” belongs to the states, with Congress—not the President—as the only federal check. Any effort by the executive branch to dictate or interfere with election administration through federal agencies is not only unlawful, but violates the fundamental principle of separation of powers. Against this backdrop, any effort to involve the United States Postal Service (“USPS”) in carrying out this executive order—especially in ways that affect the handling, timing, or treatment of election mail—must be rejected. In New Jersey, election officials have shown that our systems, including vote-by-mail, can be both secure and accessible to eligible voters. For decades, our state has put in place strong safeguards to protect election integrity. Mail-in ballots, for example, must meet strict labeling requirements, including clear markings such as “Official Mail-In Ballot” and “It is against the law for anyone except you, the voter, to mark or inspect this ballot.” Voters must also verify their identity and sign their ballot under penalty of perjury or face potential criminal charges. Every county is required to provide secure ballot drop boxes equipped with security cameras to protect ballots. State law also sets clear timelines and rules for the delivery, receipt, and counting of ballots. And voters can track their ballots and confirm that they were received. In addition to state law, New Jersey launched its Voter Protection Initiative in 2022—a multi-agency effort to safeguard election integrity. The program “monitors and investigates election fraud and other criminal violations and directs reports of interference to local and federal law enforcement as needed” among other things. Together, these protections have produced secure elections, high participation, orderly administration, and strong public confidence. They also reflect the constitutional authority of states to set the time, place, and manner of elections. To be clear—USPS itself has recognized the limits of its authority in its recent rulemaking, specifically stating: “Postal Service does not administer elections, establish the rules or deadlines that govern elections, or determine whether or how election jurisdictions utilize the mail or incorporate our postmark into their rules. The Postal Service also does not advocate for or against any particular voting practices (including mailin qvoting). Instead, the Postal Service collects, processes, transports, and delivers mail and packages that are mailable under federal law. As part of that role, we deliver the nation’s Election Mail when public policy makers and election officials choose to use the mail as a part of their election system and when citizens choose to utilize our services to participate in an election.” This official position from USPS clearly defines its role and legal obligations. USPS is a neutral carrier of election mail—not an election authority. It cannot assume powers reserved to the states or change its operations in ways that interfere with state election laws or voter access. The dangers of federal overreach regarding elections—both in New Jersey and across the country—are not just theoretical. They are immediate and real. Any federal action, whether through directive, pressure, or operational change, that disrupts these systems would be unlawful and could disenfranchise voters who rely on the mail to cast their ballots. Seniors, military voters, working families, and people with disabilities would be hit hardest by any decline in the reliability or neutrality of election mail. USPS cannot be used to carry out an unconstitutional executive order. Doing so would be a direct attack on states’ constitutional authority over our elections. Accordingly, we demand that USPS: 1. Refuse to implement any provision of Trump’s executive order that interferes with state election laws or the established handling of election mail; 2. Publicly reaffirm the Postal Service’s commitment to neutrality and to following state election laws; 3. Coordinate closely with state and local election officials—including those in New Jersey —to ensure the timely, secure, and accurate delivery of all election mail consistent with state law; and 4. Provide Congress with a full and transparent accounting of any communications, guidance, or operational changes considered in response to this executive order. At a time when our democratic institutions are under great strain, the rule of law must prevail over political partisanship. The Constitution does not allow the executive branch to seize control of state-run elections, nor does not permit federal agencies to carry out that dangerous overreach.10 USPS must remain what the law requires it to be: a neutral, reliable carrier for the people’s voice—not a tool to suppress it. Not to be left out, Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (Dem – Illinois) jumped on the bandwagon and sent the Postmaster General a letter of his own, basically telling him the same thing as the NJ crew — ignore Trump: I’m demanding answers from USPS after Trump’s executive order threatened access to absentee and mail ballots ahead of the 2026 midterms. USPS must remain a neutral carrier of election mail — not a gatekeeper deciding who gets to vote. Read my letter: https://t.co/lI7mgudslL pic.twitter.com/rrbm3vX7ES — Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (@CongressmanRaja) April 9, 2026 Would you believe me if I told you the now embattled notorious Trump-hater Letitia James is attacking the President at exactly the same point as the other Democrats? Could it be that President Trump has struck a nerve by stopping the election fraud happening under the auspices of the USPS? Could it be… that the fraudsters are scared? James dropped this post, highlighting those “free, fair, and secure elections” the Democrats like to pretend exist, pretending that President Trump’s actions are somehow dangerous to election integrity: Our elections are and always have been free, fair, and secure. We won't allow this administration to attack the very foundation of our nation.https://t.co/AVp6VJKpvp — NY AG James (@NewYorkStateAG) April 7, 2026 And that brings me to the other leg of this story. While our NJ ‘slew’ of Democrats are calling on the USPS to revolt… Dozens of ‘blue’ states are going to court, desperate to get President Trump’s AUTHENTIC ‘free, fair, and secure’ election integrity demolished and destroyed before the midterms. That lawsuit was presented just over a week ago, as reported on Friday by Reuters: A coalition of Democratic state attorneys general filed a lawsuit on Friday challenging U.S. President Donald Trump’s new executive order tightening rules ​on mail‑in voting. The lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Boston, added to the ‌rising number of legal challenges taking aim at the order Trump signed on Tuesday, with cases also being pursued by arms of the Democratic Party and voting rights advocates. The case was filed by attorneys general in 22 ​states and the District of Columbia and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, a Democrat. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson in a statement responded: “Only Democrat politicians ​and operatives would be upset about lawful efforts to secure American elections and ensure only eligible American citizens are casting ballots.” His [President Trump] executive order directs his administration to compile a list of ‌confirmed U.S. ⁠citizens eligible to vote in each state and to use federal data to help state election officials verify who is eligible to vote. It also requires the U.S. Postal Service to only deliver ballots to voters on each state’s approved mail-in ballot list. States must also preserve ​election-related records for five ​years. They said allowing Trump’s order to ​stand would force ⁠states to rush to overhaul their election systems before November, causing chaos and likely disenfranchising eligible voters. Imagine that. Cross-referencing voter rolls? Only delivering ballots to verified voters? And STOPPING the ‘late ballots’ that come flooding in after deadlines, which have suddenly (against mathematic possibility) swung the outcome of elections wildly in the wee hours of the morning, after those deadlines had passed? Imagine… the thought of stopping that being a BAD thing. Even worse — imagine the REALITY that we’ve been doing elections without any of those safeguards for decades! I want to drop in one more video clip to round this out, just to bring back to remembrance what’s at stake. And point out exactly why the Democrats are going all-in on this attack. Check out this video shared from Laura Loomer yesterday via X, focusing on the fact that illegal aliens are routinely handling mail-in-ballots: Midterm Election Integrity Update Did you know illegal aliens are being employed by the USPS and could be handling your mail-in-ballots in 6 months? As midterms loom, the media and political establishment are suspiciously silent about one of the Biden administration’s… pic.twitter.com/QwT8UQ32UR — Laura Loomer (@LauraLoomer) April 8, 2026 Here’s a full screen version of that clip for convenience, and I’ll drop the full text of her post below as well: