I suppose I should say here’s how the fraud ALLEGEDLY works in California elections if I want to be ultra conservative, but after I show you everything I’m about to show you, I am struggling to see how you can come to any conclusion other than this is a massive wide-open door to not only allow fraud but to invite it in the front door. Let’s start with these posts that are going viral on X claiming in a new drop of 24,000 mail in / drop off ballots, Spencer Pratt received ZERO votes and Nithya Raman Noodles took the lion’s share. Take a look here: The Fix is In?! BREAKING NEWS out of California – massive ballot drop in Los Angeles mayoral race saw Republican Spencer Pratt get ZERO votes out of 24,000 ballots delivered. Zero. The odds of that happening are 1 in multiple TRILLIONS, as Democrat Nithya Raman now pulls closer… pic.twitter.com/wpRjfRW8bM — Conservative Brief (@ConservBrief) June 5, 2026 The Fact-Checkers are in overdrive trying hard to claim this is NOT TRUE! But….it is true. At least according to Rasmussen Reports. Take a look right here, 9,521 to Raman Noodles and ZERO, not even 1….ZERO to Spencer Pratt: That Pratt-Free LA Ballot Drop: 'It didn't happen!!!' But it DID Happen Bass: +12,853Raman: +9,521Miller: +1,227Others: +1,233Pratt: 0@JBBlackClover https://t.co/7JcHfHpOOH — Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) June 5, 2026 Statistically impossible it seems like to me! In fact, Rasmussen also reports that it doesn’t even need to be a physical drop anymore, just set up a “virtual machine” press a button and POOF, Raman Noodles takes the lead! That Pratt-Free Ballot Drop? No human intervention with the physical ballots is necessary. Just set up a virtual machine to handle the job and press "Execute." When the virtual machine is done it disappears without a trace except under rigorous forensic analysis of the hard… https://t.co/BgnRmyjmL2 pic.twitter.com/hmdtfhMlNc — Rasmussen Reports (@Rasmussen_Poll) June 5, 2026 But I wonder if this wasn’t an elaborate sting to finally catch them in the act. Because after all, we all know if the Trump Administration re-litigates the Stolen 2020 election, blue haired Democrats will never stop crying foul. But if it’s not an election where Trump is on the ballot and they catch massive fraud, then it’s a lot harder to cry foul. Is that what we just got? I think so. Local KTLA is reporting MULTIPLE federal prosecutors already have MULTIPLE election fraud investigations underway in California: Federal prosecutors say multiple election fraud investigations are underway in California as officials continue counting ballots from this week's primary election. https://t.co/26gLwjoaPv pic.twitter.com/J1rmpz5z20 — KTLA (@KTLA) June 5, 2026 From KTLA: Federal prosecutors say multiple election fraud investigations are underway in California as officials continue counting ballots from this week’s primary election. The announcement came Friday from U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, who said his office is working with the FBI on several election fraud investigations but did not identify any specific cases or provide details about the allegations being examined. “Protecting the integrity of California’s elections is a top priority for my office,” Essayli wrote in a post on X. “We will follow the evidence wherever it leads and prosecute any violations of federal election law to the fullest extent.” Essayli’s comments came a day after President Donald Trump claimed on Truth Social that California’s election was being investigated by federal prosecutors, alleging “big cheating by the Democrats in California.” The president did not immediately provide evidence to support the allegation. The U.S. Attorney’s Office declined to comment Thursday when asked by KTLA about Trump’s claim. In Friday’s statement, Essayli criticized California’s election system, arguing that universal vote-by-mail and the state’s lack of voter identification requirements create conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished. California election officials and voting-rights advocates have long defended the state’s voting system, pointing to safeguards that include voter registration verification, signature matching and ballot tracking. The comments come as election workers across California continue processing and counting ballots cast in Tuesday’s primary election. Under state law, vote-by-mail ballots postmarked by Election Day can still be counted if they arrive within seven days, and counties have several weeks to complete the official canvass before results are certified. Christian Grose, a political science and public policy professor at USC and director of the university’s Democracy and Fair Elections Lab, told KTLA on Thursday that the time required to count ballots is a normal part of California’s election process and reflects the state’s security measures and vote-by-mail policies. Dan Vicuña, senior policy director for voting and fair representation at Common Cause, also defended the state’s system, calling California’s vote-by-mail program “revolutionary.” We also have boots on the ground, Trump Admin prosecutors are currently touring the voting centers: An assistant United States attorney, Robert Renner, is observing & asking questions inside L.A. County's central processing center where hundreds-of-thousands of ballots remain to be counted. Also with him is a worker who identified as being with California AG Bonta's office. pic.twitter.com/iVkEt5yvtx — Matt Finn (@MattFinnFNC) June 5, 2026 US Attorney Bill Essayli also confirms multiple CA voter fraud investigations are underway: JUST IN: United States Attorney Bill Essayli announces on X that his office has “multiple” fraud investigations underway into California’s elections. This comes less than 24 hours after President Trump called on the media to cover the irregularities in those races and said… pic.twitter.com/IeMMNZSQh1 — Overton (@overton_news) June 5, 2026 But I want to end with an incredible video from Benny Johnson who breaks down EXACTLY how this all works…. And it’s even crazier and more brain-dead than you could ever imagine. Watch here: !function(r,u,m,b,l,e){r._Rumble=b,r[b]||(r[b]=function(){(r[b]._=r[b]._||[]).push(arguments);if(r[b]._.length==1){l=u.createElement(m),e=u.getElementsByTagName(m)[0],l.async=1,l.src=”https://rumble.com/embedJS/ulzerp”+(arguments[1].video?’.’+arguments[1].video:”)+”/?url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href)+”&args=”+encodeURIComponent(JSON.stringify([].slice.apply(arguments))),e.parentNode.insertBefore(l,e)}})}(window, document, “script”, “Rumble”); Rumble(“play”, {“video”:”v78omey”,”div”:”rumble_v78omey”}); FULL TRANSCRIPT: I wanna quickly break down how California has codified voter fraud into their state constitution and how this allows Democrats to rig any race they want across the state. And of course, this is a lesson in why we must pass the SAVE Act immediately. California libtards will tell you that the reason why it’s taking so long to count the votes in California is because they have fifteen million votes to count. This is the number for the 2024 election. But that argument is of course destroyed when you look over at Texas, which counted eleven point three million votes in one night, and Florida, which counted nearly eleven million votes by close of polls, 7 PM. By 9 PM, 99 percent of the vote was counted in Florida. This is of course failure by design. California took weeks to resolve the 2024 election. We waited for months to figure out who was gonna represent certain districts as the California election fraud machine kicked into high gear. And what is that exactly? Well, it’s a machine that doesn’t do voter ID, so we have no idea who’s actually voting, and is a machine that allows for votes to come in forever, permanently after election day. You can see here from the Secretary of State’s website, California primary election. We’re gonna let ballots be delivered all the way through to July 10th, 2026. That’s when we’ll finally certify the results, 5 whole weeks after the election. But it gets so much worse. Anybody can deliver any amount of ballots that they want in California, and given the fact that they mail ballots to every single voter, that means you can just walk in with a bag of ballots. Nobody asks you where you got ’em, and you carry ’em in to this dark room and dump them into a dark box, no questions asked. Literally the law in California. And that’s why the elections look like this. Just pallets of ballots stacked, overflowing inside of the postal service in these dingy boxes. Just piles of ballots everywhere. Nobody knows where they came from, nobody knows who voted, there’s no voter ID, and more importantly, there’s no address. Now, we went viral earlier this year by posting a video from a toilet that had 26 people registered at it in Los Angeles. This toilet has people voting at it even though there’s no business here, there’s no residences here. You can’t live here, but you can vote here. We were, of course, fact-checked and found false by PolitiFact for showing that there was voter fraud in California because 26 people were registered to a toilet. Why is this false and why did we not dispute this? Because they’re right. Look at this from the Secretary of State in California. This is where your mind is about to be blown. Secretary of State, voters experiencing homelessness fact sheet. Let’s read. If you’re unable to use an address when you register to vote, just describe the location where you live, so it’s clear enough for our county election officials to find your voting precinct. You may use a cross street, you may use a park, you could use a Burger King parking lot, the dumpster out back as your address. This ensures that you can receive accurate election material based on where you live. California straight up allows anybody to register from anywhere. You can register from, and it says so right here on the Secretary of State’s website, a park. A public park can be where you get your ballot, or a crosswalk. You could live underneath a stop sign. You can live, of course, in a piss-soaked meth den tent under a freeway and they’ll deliver you a ballot. They’ll send someone to deliver you a ballot. So this is the law in California, and with no voter ID, and with hundreds of thousands of homeless zombies roaming the streets on super meth, you can imagine that there are hundreds of thousands of ballots that are delivered to people, picked up mysteriously, voted for, no voter ID, no signature required, and dropped off in their mysterious little black voting centers in order to give you pallets of ballots that look like this. You can never find out who’s voting, you can’t find out where they come from, and by the way, the voter fraud literally takes place right on your screen. Here is CNN. For the last recall election, Gavin Newsom, check this out. You can literally watch the vote counter change in real time for the people saying Gavin Newsom should be recalled went down by three hundred thousand, and the people saying he should went up by 300,000. It’s just magic. So certainly a mix of machines and then pallets of ballots being delivered, and that is exactly why Nithya Raman, who nobody likes, nobody cares about, nobody can even spell her name, who is one of the least popular politicians in the country, along with Karen Bass, are getting these mysterious giant ballot dumps that go one hundred percent for the number 2 candidate. Isn’t that interesting? Because it’d be mathematically impossible at the same percentage rates for Nithya Raman to overtake Spencer Pratt here. But because they keep increasing the number of ballots that you can vote with by increasing the number of ballots that are out in the homeless encampments or wherever, the parks, the street corners, well, this is how you get it. Genuine question, how is it even mathematically possible for Nithya Raman to overtake? If Bass keeps even roughly her current pace, which she has, Raman would need 60 percent of the remaining ballots in order to pass him. That’s an enormous late break margin. Missing something? Yeah, you’re missing the way that California votes. And that’s why you see the percentages increasing the number of ballots that are outstanding. The more they count, the less they count. Do you understand? The more they count, the less percentage of expected votes are actually counted. They keep increasing the number of votes or just straight up deleting them. This is why far left-wing Nithya Raman, who was sobbing on election night, is probably whistling Dixie right now because she didn’t quite understand the power of the Democrat machine. This is why the prediction markets are now skyrocketing because they do understand the power of the Democrat machine. So does Democrat Katie Porter, who gave a perfect answer here when she was asked, “Why would you need anybody to vote for you who’s a Republican?” Listen to this. Of California voters who you’ll need in order to win, um, who voted for Trump. How would I need them in order to win, ma’am? Well, unless you think you’re gonna get 60 percent of the vote. You think you’ll get 60 per– all, in a general election? She says this out of confidence. This is of course a horrible answer for any politician to make. Yeah, no, I don’t want your vote. I hate your vote. She says this because she’s a Democrat in California, and she can get away with it. She’s a Democrat in California, and she knows that Republican votes don’t matter. They’ll just make up the votes because of the way the elections are counted and structured. Florida processed more than ten million votes in a matter of hours. California takes days or weeks to count the votes, says Ron DeSantis. It’s pathetic and corrosive to our civic culture. That is of course correct. Nate Silver even saying that California votes like the third world, like a failed state. When Nate Silver is calling out your fraud, you got a real problem, but don’t expect any apologies from the man who made it all possible. This is a Guest Post from our friends over at WLTReport. View the original article here.