Although his efforts to deport dangerous illegal immigrants allowed free rein of the country under the Biden administration have been popular among the American people, President Donald Trump is facing persistent obstacles from Democrats and left-leaning judges. Following the most recent court order blocking the White House’s plan to use the Alien Enemies Act to expedite deportations of violent criminals, Trump issued a scathing response to the judges intent on standing in the way of his administration. As The Hill reported: “Can it be so that Judges aren’t allowing the USA to Deport Criminals, including Murderers, out of our Country and back to where they came from?” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “If this is so, our Country, as we know it, is finished! Americans will have to get used to a very different, crime filled, LIFE,” he continued. post on Truth Social. “This is not what our Founders had in mind!!!” The president’s criticism comes less than two days after U.S. District Judge Fernando Rodriguez Jr., an appointee of Trump, ruled that the AEA does not allow the commander-in-chief to quickly deport alleged Venezuelan gang members to a jail in El Salvador, extending an existing block. Rodriguez Jr. said in his ruling Thursday that the 18th century law can only be utilized when an “organized, armed force” is coming into the U.S., therefore rejecting the administration’s assertion that the law can be used against alleged members of the Tren de Aragua (TdA) gang. The ongoing debate over Trump’s immigration enforcement agenda has sparked significant discussion on social media: Ilhan Omar, who should be deported, is mad about Trump deporting people in her district under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act. Hopefully, Trump uses it on her. Send her back to her homeland! pic.twitter.com/gH9f6cPtBo — Gunther Eagleman (@GuntherEagleman) April 30, 2025 Double standard alert: Trump must follow procedure, but SCOTUS gets to play by different rules to block the deportation of Venezuelan gang members under the Alien Enemies Act. This was planned from the start in my view, and Trump should do what he has to do to save our country! pic.twitter.com/cL1Mwge2Mz — Michele (@MAJMO50) May 1, 2025 BREAKING: Federal Judge Issues PERMANENT Injunction, Bars Trump Administration From Using Alien Enemies Act to Remove Venezuelan Gang Members. 5Th Circuit MUST slap it down, or SCOTUS; NO JUDGE CAN STOP PRESIDENT’S ARTICLE II Powers! Bannon predicts by June 15, 10th… pic.twitter.com/2TWyBQF9r1 — TRUTH NOW (@sxdoc) May 1, 2025 In a recent Fox News op-ed, Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the use of the 18th century law: The United States government recognized the impossibility of differentiating between subgroups, which represented ever-shifting factions in Paris, and decided the question was ultimately unimportant. Every one of these individuals was a de facto member of a private army, and members of foreign private armies had no business operating on American soil. That is also why the exact nature of the connections between organizations such as Tren de Aragua and foreign governments is irrelevant. Some critics, thinking they are clever, will argue that one of Tren de Aragua’s key patrons, the Venezuelan regime’s former Vice President Tareck El Aissami, was arrested and charged with treason in 2023. The private army of a foreign warlord does not cease to be a foreign army just because that warlord loses a battle. The assassination of Mexican politicians by drug cartels is precisely how those cartels exercise control of Mexican politics, not evidence against their political ambitions. The Alien Enemies Act was designed to ensure that the politics of foreign nations would not spread to our shores. Whether they are currently winning or losing, Tren de Aragua is waging a terrorist campaign of murder across our hemisphere in the service of the Venezuelan regime, and we have the duty to expel anyone involved from our nation consistent with all other applicable laws. Here’s some additional coverage of the recent court ruling: What do you think?