A New York state school district has spoken out after a now-former employee — a 22-year-old female — was accused of sending nude photos of herself to a 14-year-old boy.The Chemung County Sheriff’s Office earlier this month said Anamaria Milazzo from the town of Elmira was arrested on charges of disseminating indecent material to minors in the second degree — a class E felony — and endangering the welfare of a child, which is a class A misdemeanor.Milazzo was issued an appearance ticket to appear in the Wellsburg Village Court at a later date, the sheriff's office said.A school resource officer assigned to the Greater Southern Tier Board of Cooperative Educational Services received a complaint June 9 alleging Milazzo sent indecent material to a minor, the sheriff's office said.The criminal investigations division of the sheriff’s office assisted with the investigation and learned that over a three-month period, Milazzo sent nude photographs of herself to a 14-year-old male, the sheriff's office said.The Daily Voice said Milazzo was arrested June 16 and that she had worked as a teaching assistant since December 2024.Milazzo was issued an appearance ticket to appear in the Wellsburg Village Court at a later date, the sheriff's office said. Susan Rider-Ulacco — chief assistant district attorney for the Chemung County District Attorney's Office — told Blaze News that Milazzo wasn't jailed, despite the felony charge against her, because of New York state's bail reform law.The Greater Southern Tier BOCES noted in a statement provided to WETM-TV earlier this week that Milazzo was "put on leave as soon as we were first made aware of the allegations by law enforcement and has not been present at BOCES since that time. She has resigned and will not be returning to campus."The district's statement added: "As this is an ongoing investigation by law enforcement, BOCES is unable to provide any further information at this time. We are committed to the safety and well-being of our students. If you believe you have relevant information relating to the investigation, please contact the Chemung County Sheriff’s Office directly." The school district last week confirmed that Milazzo was a former employee at a BOCES facility in Chemung County, WETM said in a previous report, adding that officials couldn't comment on when her employment ended or her role at the district.The 14-year-old boy was not identified, and it’s not clear if he was a student at the same BOCES school where Milazzo worked, according to the New York Post.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

It was a rough day for liberals both on and off the U.S. Supreme Court. The high court sided in Mahmoud v. Taylor with Maryland parents who want to protect their children from LGBT propaganda in Montgomery County Public Schools. This ruling enraged non-straight activists, including the Human Rights Campaign, which called the decision "devastating." In Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton, the Supreme Court upheld the Lone Star State's age verification law protecting children from pornography. Activists called the ruling "wrongheaded" and "invasive."The Supreme Court indicated in Trump v. CASA, Inc. that the national injunctions weaponized against the Trump administration by district court judges "likely exceed the equitable authority that Congress has given to federal courts." Democrats melted down over the ruling, calling it "deplorable" and "a vile betrayal of our Constitution."The court ruled 6-3 in each of these cases, and in all three, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was in the dissenting minority.Not only did Jackson not get her way, her apparent ignorance and judicial freewheeling was exposed for all to see in CASA, where she noted in a dissenting opinion that the majority's decision not only "diverges from first principles" but is "profoundly dangerous, since it gives the Executive the go-ahead to sometimes wield the kind of unchecked, arbitrary power the Founders crafted our Constitution to eradicate."'In her law-declaring vision of the judicial function, a district court's opinion is not just persuasive, but has the legal force of a judgment.'Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who delivered the opinion of the court in CASA, noted that Justice Sonia Sotomayor's dissent focused on "conventional legal terrain, like the Judiciary Act of 1789 and our cases on equity." Jackson, on the other hand,chooses a startling line of attack that is tethered neither to these sources nor, frankly, to any doctrine whatsoever. Waving away attention to the limits on judicial power as a 'mind-numbingly technical query' ... she offers a vision of the judicial role that would make even the most ardent defender of judicial supremacy blush.Barrett noted that her untethered colleague apparently believes both that "the fundamental role of courts is to 'order everyone (including the Executive) to follow the law — full stop,'" and that "if courts lack the power to 'require the Executive to adhere to law universally' ... courts will leave a 'gash in the basic tenets of our founding charter that could turn out to be a mortal wound.'"RELATED: MASSIVE VICTORY: SCOTUS sides with parents; Alito nukes LGBT indoctrination campaign Sarah Silbiger-Pool/Getty ImagesThe former Notre Dame Law School professor tried to make sense out of Jackson's position, though admitted that it was "difficult to pin down."Barrett suggested that Jackson either believes that universal injunctions are appropriate whenever a defendant is part of the executive branch — a position that "goes far beyond the mainstream defense of universal injunctions" — or, "more extreme still," that "the reasoning behind any court order demands 'universal adherence,' at least where the Executive is concerned.""In her law-declaring vision of the judicial function, a district court's opinion is not just persuasive, but has the legal force of a judgment," wrote Barrett. "Once a single district court deems executive conduct unlawful, it has stated what the law requires. And the Executive must conform to that view, ceasing its enforcement of the law against anyone, anywhere."Barrett proceeded to insinuate that former President Joe Biden's DEI appointee was ignorant of the relevant American legal history and precedent and may have skipped analysis of relevant readings because they involved "boring 'legalese.'" "We will not dwell on Justice Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries' worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," wrote Barrett.Although she would not dwell on Jackson's understanding, Barrett nevertheless pointed out that the liberal justice "decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A foreign-based website referred to as the ICE List is exposing the names and photographs of dozens of Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers amid a 413% increase in assaults against agents since President Donald Trump began his second term.The website states that it is a "crowdsourced database of individuals involved in deportations, ICE operations, and associated abuses." 'I never thought we'd see international journalists launch a similar project for the US.'It claims to obtain information about ICE agents from public sources, including social media profiles and news coverage, and that it does not publish private data, such as home addresses or personal contact details.In addition to exposing known ICE agents, it also lists unidentified officers whom the site has accused of "assault and kidnapping," presumably referring to the arrests of foreign nationals who are unlawfully in the United States.The database's stated goal is "transparency and public accountability," and it claims it "does not support harassment, doxxing, or any illegal activity."RELATED: Illegal alien child-rapist remains at large thanks to anti-ICE group: DHS Photo by Smith Collection/Gado/Getty ImagesDHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Blaze News, "This is not an 'independent media group.' These are thugs.""We will prosecute those who doxx ICE agents to the fullest extent of the law. These criminals are taking the side of vicious cartels and human traffickers. We won't allow it in America," McLaughlin added.The controversial "open journalistic project" was created by the Crustian Daily, a Substack account that claims to publish "plainspoken breakdowns of complex political topics." The journal celebrated the release of Mahmoud Khalil, accused President Donald Trump of violating the U.S. Constitution by striking Iran, and argued that ICE is a "modern Gestapo."A June 14 article from the Crustian Daily titled "We're Building a Database of ICE Identities, Here's Why" contends that "fascists are terrorizing the population" and "fighting back is a community effort." The article argues that the ICE database is "not harassment" because it does not "encourage threats."While no author is listed on the Substack, its footer credits Dominick Skinner, who, according to his Bluesky and LinkedIn accounts, appears to be based out of the Netherlands. Skinner and the Crustian Daily are linked to a website called Crustianity, which parodies Christianity by "celebrat[ing] pizza" while claiming it is "as real as any other" religion. It describes its debt for sin as "punching a Nazi."As of Friday morning, the Crustian Daily's ICE list was taken offline, but apparently only temporarily.A Threads post from the journal explained, "Our web host has terminated the hosting for the ICE List. Likely a request from the US government. Moving to a more trustworthy host as we speak."The Crustian Daily continued to encourage individuals to submit information about law enforcement officers while the site is down."New ICE List website should be up by the end of today, tomorrow at the latest," a separate post read. "The US government may have set us back by about a day, But they've gone and made us more determined than ever."Despite evidence of a Netherlands base — indicated by Skinner's social media accounts, the Crustianity website selling rainbow "Punch Nazis" shirts in euros, and hosting meetups exclusively in the Netherlands — the ICE List and the Crustian Daily try to appear to be U.S.-centric organizations, reinforced by their focus on American immigration issues and omission of international ties.'Together, we can fight fascism in the USA.'A comment to Newsweek from Andrew Fels, an attorney at Al Otro Lado, seemed to confirm that the ICE List is not run by anyone based in the United States."This kind of open source counterintelligence is common in conflict zones around the globe, particularly against security forces deemed unaccountable or suspected of human rights violations. But I never thought we'd see international journalists launch a similar project for the U.S.," Fels told the news outlet.RELATED: Street riots can’t set US immigration policy Photo by Tasos Katopodis/Getty ImagesBlaze News contacted the ICE List to confirm its association with Dominick Skinner, clarify the operational base of the website and the Crustian Daily, and address concerns about whether the list could exacerbate the reported 413% surge in assaults against ICE officers.An individual identifying only as "Dominick" declined to answer these questions directly. Yet his response continued to echo rhetoric mirroring American political debates."Hmm, I would expect some questions on the state of the country, after Trump unleashed ICE on the people of the USA, the fear put into the hearts of American citizens, the damage done to US democracy, and indeed, the legality of these acts, under both domestic law and international humanitarian laws," Dominick wrote. "As you should be aware, we want a database that can be relied on in courts, we want to match the crimes committed, to those committing them. And, just like with the Nazis, and as laid out by international law, we don't believe that 'just following orders' is an excuse.""I do not believe you're reporting with good intentions, based on the one-sidedness of the questions," he stated, declaring that he would reply to the questions only on the condition that Blaze News send another "fair and even" list of inquiries. Underneath Dominick's signature, it read, "Together, we can fight fascism in the USA."Less than an hour later, Dominick sent a follow-up email accusing Blaze News of attempting to "make a threat" and "not request for comment.""If your intentions are what you claim they are, the only way of me answering questions, is in a back and forth, where you answer my questions," Dominick wrote. "I'll treat further failure to respond as a rejection of that request, and inform my community of your lack of bravery on this topic, and a confirmation that you intended on passing on a threat."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

60 Minutes Mutiny: Pampered Reporters Throw Hissy Fit Over Not Picking Their Own Boss

Book Bans Are SO HOT Again: San Fran Bookstore Pulls Harry Potter Because JK Rowling Is 'Anti-Trans'

Chris Cuomo Slams CNN for Chasing Pod Bro Hysteria: Quit Playing Tabloid, Losers

Mark Penn Describes NYC Dem Primary System 'Changes' and How the Results Have the Party Panicking

Pride Month Takes Another Hit With Pete Hegseth's Official Military Ship Announcement

Whoa! WaPo Drops Blistering Op-Ed on Socialist NYC Mayoral Candidate Zohran Mamdani

Ten Fantastic Tips for the Rural, Outdoor Lifestyle