Allowing players to choose their own custom text-based faces in Content Warning is a genius move. There are so many varieties that can be played with to create some truly weird and wonderful outcomes. With this guide‚ you can add your own Ascii text custom faces to Content Warning. How to add custom faces to Content Warning In the game‚ there is a limit to what you can actually do with your keyboard faces in Content Warning. However‚ by diving into the registry files‚ you can start using characters you never normally could to make your face much more interesting. This process is very simple but will only work on a PC and will require you to have opened the game and saved a face already. Simply follow these steps. Image: PC Invasion Open your Registry Files by pressing the Windows key and searching for Registry Editor. Open the Registry Editor and locate the folder called HKEY_CURRENT_USER. Inside this‚ you need to locate Software‚ then Landfall games‚ and finally‚...

With all the new Diablo 4 Season 4 PTR changes it’s hard to take in everything that Blizzard is implementing. There are two new crafting systems called Tempering and Masterworking arriving in Diablo 4‚ but how do they work? What is the Tempering crafting system in Diablo 4? As described in this Blizzard blog post‚ Tempering is a crafting system coming to the Season 4 PTR that will allow you to add affixes to items using a new reusable item through a Blacksmith. This reusable item is a Temper Manual‚ and they can drop from practically anything. Image: Blizzard You can use Temper Manuals an unlimited amount of times‚ and they come with more than just one affix‚ although you can attach them one at a time. If you’re unhappy with the affixes‚ you can reroll them up to their Temper Reroll limit. Each Temper Manual is categorized like the Codex of Power‚ and while most items can only have Tempered affixes from one category‚ Ancestral items can have two affixes fro...

The Final Fantasy 16 crossover allows Warriors of Light to earn several unique rewards. The most sought-after are Clive’s outfit and his trusty companion. Here’s how to get the Torgal Mount and Clive outfit in FFXIV. How to get the Final Fantasy 16 rewards in FFXIV You can earn the Torgal Mount and Clive outfit as part of the Final Fantasy 16 crossover event. The event quest is called A Land On Fire and runs until May 8‚ 2024. The task has multiple steps‚ including a tough boss battle and can be started in Ul’dah by the Steps of Nald. If you’re lost or unsure how to tackle the event‚ let me show you what to do step by step.  Visit the Steps of Nald in Ul’dah Screenshot: PC Invasion Teleport to the Steps of Nald Aether Crystal and speak to the Neophyte Adventurer. This NPC is standing on the street just outside‚ and you can accept the ‘A Land on Fire’ quest from them.  Scroll through the dialogue‚ and you’ll b...

While Scorched Earth is a smaller map than The Island in Ark Survival Ascended‚ it still has plenty of good base locations for PvP and PvE. There are a lot of great base locations in Ark Survival Ascended Scorched Earth‚ but these ones are the best. What are the best Scorched Earth base locations in Ark Survival Ascended? The five Scorched Earth base locations I’ve highlighted in this guide are the wyvern trench cave‚ slot canyon cave‚ mountaintop‚ church cave‚ and arch cave. If you’re ready to move on from the best bases in The Island‚ these are the five best base locations discovered so far in Ark Survival Ascended Scorched Earth. Wyvern trench cave base location – ASA Scorched Earth Screenshot: PC InvasionScreenshot: PC InvasionScreenshot: PC Invasion Wyvern trench cave coordinates – Latitude: 59.1‚ Longitude: 16.3 There is a new cave in the wyvern trench in Ark Survival Ascended Scorched Earth. This cave is located within the wyvern trench‚ obvi...

YouTube is awash with hilarious Content Warning footage of people getting up to the most bizarre things. If you want to get on the hype and maybe rack up a few views‚ you need to be able to find your Content Warning saved recordings to upload. Here is where they are hidden. Shoot your recording and save in-game The first thing you need to do is shoot some footage in Content Warning and save it in-game. For anyone who has played the game‚ this process is pretty simple. You simply grab your video footage and return it with the recorder to your house. Image: PC Invasion Equip your camera in-game and record the footage you want to save. Return to your machine with the camera. Drop your camera into the machine and wait until it fires out a disk. With the disk‚ return home‚ and insert the disk into your TV. Once the footage has finished playing you will be given the option to Save to Desktop. This will save your Content Warning footage to your PC‚ ready to be upl...

Joe Biden‚ the “devout” Catholic who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue‚ issued a proclamation on Good Friday‚ the day Christians remember Jesus’ death on the cross before his Resurrection three days later on Easter Sunday. Biden chose Good Friday to publicly announce that he would designate the following Sunday as an important day in American life. The day would commemorate the dying of an old self and the beginning of a new kind of identity. Yet this religious quasi-resurrection did not involve Jesus‚ but people who claim that their “gender identity” overrides their biological sex. Biden did not mark Good Friday or Easter Sunday in his proclamation‚ rather he marked “Transgender Day of Visibility.“ “Transgender Americans are part of the fabric of our Nation‚” Biden declared. “They deserve‚ and are entitled to‚ the same rights and freedoms as every other American‚ including the most fundamental freedom to be their true selves.” Of course‚ Biden did not admit that this freedom for transgender people “to be their true selves” amounts to stifling everyone else’s freedom to call a spade a spade‚ along with parents’ freedom to protect their children from an ideology that will leave them stunted‚ scarred‚ and infertile. Indeed‚ Biden took the opportunity to condemn those who dare dissent from the orthodoxy of his new state religion. “But extremists are proposing hundreds of hateful laws that target and terrify transgender kids and their families—silencing teachers; banning books; and even threatening parents‚ doctors‚ and nurses with prison for helping parents get care for their children‚” the president said in the proclamation. Note the subversion: Parents are not trying to silence teachers or ban books; they’re fighting to get pornographic materials out of school libraries and to protect their children from the lie that a boy can become a girl and vice versa. Biden calls these efforts “hateful‚” but he describes life-altering drugs that put kids on a path to permanently mutilating their bodies as “care.” It’s no accident that Biden—or whoever drafted this proclamation for him—left any mention of Good Friday or Easter out of the proclamation. His statements in that document operate out of an entirely different worldview than that of traditional Christianity. Christianity preaches the gospel: that all of us are sinful and need redemption‚ that Jesus died on the cross to pay the penalty and reconcile us to God‚ and that he rose from the dead to show his divinity and to give us hope for our ultimate resurrection. The Catholic Church to which Biden belongs preaches this gospel. Yet gender ideology promises its own weaker version of the gospel: that society is sinful and needs to repent of hating transgender people‚ that people who identify as transgender can reject their biological sex and be accepted for “who they are” in the gender identity opposite their sex‚ and that “gender-affirming care” and societal acceptance will give transgender people the well-being they deserve. Demonizing and silencing opponents is a fundamental part of this project‚ because the transgender gospel calls on all society not just to accept transgender identity but to celebrate it. Traditional Christianity poses a problem for this because the Bible teaches that God made humans male and female‚ and neither the scriptures nor Catholic tradition condones the idea that a person can reject his or her biological sex and become a member of the opposite sex. For these and other reasons‚ Republicans attacked Biden’s proclamation on Good Friday. House Speaker Mike Johnson‚ R-La.‚ said the White House “betrayed the central tenet of Easter—which is the Resurrection of Jesus Christ.” “Banning sacred truth and tradition—while at the same time proclaiming Easter Sunday as ‘Transgender Day’—is outrageous and abhorrent‚” Johnson said‚ referring to a ban on religious art during the traditional White House Easter Egg Roll. (Both the White House and an organization involved in the Easter event that banned religious imagery said the rules prohibiting religious imagery at the White House Easter Egg Roll go back decades.) The Biden White House has betrayed the central tenet of Easter — which is the resurrection of Jesus Christ. Banning sacred truth and tradition—while at the same time proclaiming Easter Sunday as “Transgender Day”—is outrageous and abhorrent. The American people are taking note. pic.twitter.com/ZCExyVkAVS— Speaker Mike Johnson (@SpeakerJohnson) March 30‚ 2024 “This is what Biden cares about and who he caters to‚” Sen. Ted Cruz‚ R-Texas‚ posted on X with a screenshot of the president’s proclamation. “He is devaluing Easter and elevating trans recognition. Downright shameful and despicable.” This is what Biden cares about and who he caters to. He is devaluing Easter and elevating trans recognition.Downright shameful and despicable. pic.twitter.com/UgFBnvKZ82— Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) March 30‚ 2024 “We call on Joe Biden’s failing campaign and White House to issue an apology to the millions of Catholics and Christians across America who believe tomorrow is for one celebration only—the resurrection of Jesus Christ‚” Trump campaign press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a written statement Saturday. White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre sought to dispel “misinformation” about the proclamation. She noted that Easter Sunday “happened to coincide with Transgender Visibility Day.” Biden has commemorated Transgender Day of Visibility on March 31 since 2021‚ Jean-Pierre said‚ while the date of Easter Sunday varies each year according to a lunar calendar. “As a Christian who celebrates Easter with family‚ President Biden stands for bringing people together and upholding the dignity and freedoms of every American‚” she added. Karine Jean-Pierre says it's "misinformation" that Biden declared Easter Sunday as "Transgender Day of Visibility."(She's lying) pic.twitter.com/1MrKrGRgzn— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 1‚ 2024 Speaking to reporters Monday‚ Biden appeared to deny marking Easter Sunday as Transgender Day of Visibility‚ however. According to Jacqui Heinrich‚ a White House correspondent for Fox News‚ another reporter asked Biden: “Speaker Johnson called it outrageous that Easter Sunday was Transgender Day of Visibility‚ what do you say to Speaker Johnson?” “He’s thoroughly uninformed‚” Biden responded. “Uninformed how?” the reporter asked. “I didn’t do that‚” Biden replied. via the pool: Q: Speaker Johnson called it outrageous that Easter Sunday was transgender day of visibility‚ what do you say to Speaker Johnson?Biden: “He’s thoroughly uninformed.”Q: Uninformed how?Biden: “I didn’t do that.”^may be a reference to Transgender Day of…— Jacqui Heinrich (@JacquiHeinrich) April 1‚ 2024 Johnson responded by posting a screenshot of Biden’s proclamation and asking‚ “This you‚ Joe Biden?” Biden has marked Transgender Day of Visibility each year since 2021‚ but that doesn’t excuse his decision to issue his proclamation for it on Good Friday without noting either Good Friday or Easter Sunday in the proclamation. Despite Jean-Pierre’s insistence that Biden can celebrate Transgender Day of Visibility and Easter on the same day‚ the unfortunate timing of Biden’s proclamation only highlighted the inherent tension between transgender orthodoxy and traditional Christianity. The president’s own proclamation also included condemnations of the Christians who refuse to celebrate transgender identity‚ as if their opposition were rooted in “hate.” The true scandal isn’t that the transgender holiday happened to line up with Easter‚ but that the White House is trumpeting the pseudo-religious holiday in the first place and using it as an excuse to demonize those who disagree. The coincidental timing only emphasizes how Biden is dividing Americans on this issue‚ drawing attention to something Christians should have been following for years. This transgender activist revealed the pride at the heart of transgender ideology: the idea that humans know better than God. I think few things are as important as honoring God during Holy Week. Read more here:https://t.co/vRWJzTZo3A pic.twitter.com/4WPWRn5ITz— Tyler O'Neil (@Tyler2ONeil) April 6‚ 2023 The post Joe Biden’s Terrible‚ Horrible‚ No Good‚ Very Bad Transgender Easter Fiasco appeared first on The Daily Signal.

‘Occupied Gaza’ Prior to Oct. 7‚ there were roughly 2 million Arab citizens of Israel but no Jewish citizens in the Gaza Strip. Gazans in 2006 voted in Hamas to rule them. It summarily executed its Palestinian Authority rivals. Hamas canceled all future scheduled elections. It established a dictatorship and diverted hundreds of billions of dollars in international aid to build a vast underground labyrinth of military installations. ‘Collateral Damage’ Hamas began the Israel-Hamas war by deliberately targeting civilians. It massacred them on Oct. 7 when it invaded Israel during a time of peace and holidays. It sent more than 7‚000 rockets into Israeli cities for the sole purpose of killing noncombatants. Hamas has no vocabulary for the collateral damage of Israeli civilians‚ since it believes any Jewish death under any circumstances is cause for celebration.Hamas places its terrorist centers beneath and inside hospitals‚ schools‚ and mosques. Why? Israel is assumed to have more reservations about collaterally hitting Gaza civilians than Hamas does about exposing them as human shields. ‘Disproportionate’ We are told that Israel wrongly uses disproportionate force to retaliate in Gaza. But it does so because no nation can win a war without disproportionate violence that hurts the enemy more than it is hurt by the enemy.The U.S. incinerated German and Japanese cities with disproportionate force to end a war both Axis powers started. In Iraq‚ the American military nearly leveled Fallujah and Mosul by disproportional force to root out Islamic gunmen hiding among innocents. Hamas has objections to disproportionate violence—but only when it is achieved by Israel and not Hamas. ‘Two-State Solution’ Prior to Oct. 7‚ there was a de facto three-state solution‚ given that Israel‚ the West Bank‚ and Gaza were all separate states ruled by their own governments‚ two of which were illegitimate without scheduled elections. It was not Israel but the people of Gaza and the West Bank who institutionalized the “from river to the sea” agenda of destroying its neighbor. Israel would have been content to live next to an autonomous Arab Gaza and West Bank that did not seek to destroy Israel in multigenerational efforts to form its own “one-state solution.” ‘Cease-Fire’ The so-called international community is demanding Israel agree to a “cease-fire.” But there was already a cease-fire prior to Oct. 7. Hamas broke it by massacring 1‚200 Jews and taking over 250 hostages. Hamas violated that peace because it thought it could gain leverage over Israel by murdering Jews. Hamas now demands another cease-fire because it thinks it is no longer able to murder more unarmed Jews. Instead‚ it now fears that Israel will destroy Hamas in the way Hamas sought but failed to destroy Israel. Did Hamas call for a cease-fire after the first 500 Jews it massacred on Oct. 7? ‘Ramadan’ President Joe Biden believes that the Muslim religious holiday of Ramadan requires Israel to agree to a cease-fire. But did either Hamas or any other Arab military ever respect Jewish—or even its own—religious holidays?The Oct. 7 massacre was timed to catch Israelis unaware while they celebrated the Jewish religious holidays of Simchat Torah‚ Shemini Torah‚ and Shemini Atzeret on Shabbat. Moreover‚ Hamas’ surprise attack was deliberately timed to commemorate the earlier sneak Arab attack on Israel some 50 years earlier. On Oct. 6‚ 1973‚ the Israelis were the target of a surprise attack when celebrating the religious holiday of Yom Kippur. Arab armies also assumed they would achieve greater surprise when attacking during their own religious holiday of Ramadan. So‚ Arab militaries fight opportunistically during Jewish holidays and their own Islamic holidays. Egyptians and Syrians still boast of their 1973 surprise attack on Israel as the Ramadan War. Only Westerners‚ not Arabs‚ believe there should be no war during Ramadan. ‘Civilian Casualties’ Israel risks the lives of its soldiers to prevent civilian deaths. Hamas risks the lives of its civilians to prevent terrorists’ deaths. Israel considers it a failure‚ but Hamas considers it globally advantageous‚ when more civilians die than its soldiers. ‘Foreign Aid’ The Biden administration threatens to cut off or slow-walk aid to Israel if it continues to retaliate against Hamas‚ even though Hamas started the war. So the administration promises to give more aid to Gaza after the Oct. 7 Hamas massacres than it gave to Gaza before Hamas’ attack. ‘Prisoners’ The international community that favors Hamas nevertheless knows it would be safer to be a prisoner of Israel than of Hamas. It knows women are not going to be raped in custody by Israelis‚ but are by Hamas. And the unarmed are more likely to be mutilated and decapitated by Hamas than Israelis. Is the international community more likely to charge Israel than Hamas for war crimes because the Jewish state seeks to avoid civilian deaths that Hamas finds useful? (C) 2024 Tribune Content Agency LLC The Daily Signal publishes a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Heritage Foundation.  The post Gaza: Truths Behind All the Lies appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. “First” there were apps like Telegram and Signal‚ springing up to address people’s fear that their private communications taking place online are being randomly and unlawfully accessed and spied on by governments. This was something that went from niche to mainstream‚ mostly thanks to the Snowden revelations. But over time‚ these chat apps themselves revealed a number of “imperfections” – leaving privacy enthusiasts wanting for more‚ and better. There has been no shortage of attempts to perfect the existing apps relying on encryption – but also people’s phone numbers‚ etc. And for the last couple of years there has been one called SimpleX Chat‚ that just rolled out a new version. The app is end-to-end encrypted‚ open source‚ but also refrains from using any type of user ID (such as phone numbers‚ usernames‚ or even‚ apparently‚ random numbers in this context). While full (E2E) encryption is generally treated as the best we can get these days‚ security and privacy-wise – day after day‚ information emerges about a flurry of ways either governments or private tech giants trying (via regulation) or by straight-up developing what would otherwise be considered hacker tools – to break those protections. Now‚ SimpleX Chat introduces a beta (in free source “release canon” – that’s one step above initial alpha testing‚ one below RC – release candidate) version of “quantum resistant encryption.” But what exactly would that be? Its developers say that “post-quantum cryptography” has been their interest for the last two years‚ that is‚ since the app’s initial release‚ but that they essentially held back on implementing it before there was some standardization. NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology)‚ however‚ failed to deliver on that front for multiple reasons‚ says a blog post‚ and now SimpleX‚ in the best tradition of free and open source‚ is trying to solve its own problem‚ instead of waiting for somebody else to write that code for them. SimpleX apparently took some pointers from Signal and Tuta encryption schemes‚ to now come up with what it believes is the better version of “the design of quantum resistant double ratchet algorithm.” The explanation of what that is plays off of the Signal protocol – to state that SimpleX developers “could make break-in recovery property of Signal algorithm quantum-resistant” – and‚ “why‚ probably‚ Signal didn’t‚ is because irrespective of the message size SimpleX Chat uses a fixed block size of 16kb to provide security and privacy against any traffic observers and against messaging relays.” And – “In case the message is larger than the remaining block size‚ e.g. when the message contains image or link preview‚ or a large text‚ we used zstd compression (lossless data compression algorithm) to provide additional space for the required keys without reducing image preview quality or creating additional traffic.” This feature is currently opt-in. The post Simplex Chat Launches Quantum-Resistant Encryption in Beta appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Ireland’s government is using every opportunity to charge ahead with promoting facial recognition tech‚ despite civil liberties groups expressing serious concerns and asking some hard questions about the policy. But the current Irish authorities don’t seem to be missing a beat making‚ however tenuous or even distasteful‚ links to push that policy. Thanks to those in power there‚ Ireland’s long-lasting troubles keep casting ever longer shadows‚ some with brand-new‚ current overtones. Namely‚ there is now controversy in the country‚ or at least among its most prominent media and politicians‚ over Irish Republican Army (IRA) member Pearse McAuley being laid to rest with his coffin draped in the nation’s flag‚ despite the fact he was found guilty of killing a police officer. Ireland’s Justice Minister Helen McEntee saw this situation as a good opportunity to try to promote the agenda of using even more facial recognition. What better time to say this is needed to “investigate attacks against gardai” – McEntee no doubt thought. The McAuley funeral “controversy” sort of spiraled out of control‚ at least as far as the “political panic” and messaging is concerned‚ reaching‚ figuratively and literally‚ some far-off places. It went everywhere from Mcentee and Garda Commissioner Drew Harris attending an event and making comments ranging from condemning the funeral arrangements for the former IRA to advocating for the police force to grow beyond what has been envisaged so far‚ to citing an extradition cooperation with the United Arab Emirates – to‚ more facial recognition. The “tie” that binds together all these policy talking points heaped into one place seems to be – this is as good a chance as any to promote something otherwise very controversial. “McEntee announced that the use of facial recognition technology (FRT) in investigating crimes was being expanded to include attacks against Garda members‚” the Irish press said. This‚ even though the Irish police clearly had no problem identifying McAuley as killing an officer – even though there was no mention that facial recognition played any role in this process back 20+ years ago. The post Ireland’s Justice Minister Helen McEntee Says “The Time for Facial Recognition Technology Has Come” appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. As swiftly as the pandemic – and more importantly‚ associated radical restrictive measures concerning people’s everyday lives – descended onto the world‚ it all seemingly quickly vanished into thin air. But the consequences‚ particularly related to the stifling of speech‚ live on in a number of legal battles being fought now to prove that both government(s) and social media were wrong to introduce mass censorship because of alleged Covid misinformation. In the US‚ this is happening specifically on the grounds that the First Amendment protections got breached in the process. Now the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) has gotten involved in one of these cases by asking the Supreme Court to make a decision in the Changizi‚ Senger‚ and Kotzin v. HHS (United States Department of Health and Human Services) lawsuit. We obtained a copy of the petition for you here. The plaintiffs here claim that their First Amendment rights were violated by the HHS and the US surgeon general – government agencies – going to then Twitter‚ a private tech company‚ with the “request” to have their voices silenced for opposing government’s Covid mandates of the era. Before it reached the Supreme Court‚ the case got into something of a “legal limbo” NCLA believes‚ saying there was effectively a split decision between “the Fifth and Sixth Circuits on what plaintiffs must show to satisfy Article III standing in censorship cases against the government.” (The “split” here refers to the Fifth Circuit’s preliminary injunction in Murthy v. Missouri.) Meanwhile‚ the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ruled that the plaintiffs had no leg to stand on in Changizi v. HHS‚ trying to fight government-imposed censorship they experienced on social media – and dismissed their claims. However‚ the criticism of the Covid mandates the three have expressed online is said by their defenders to have been “reasoned” – in other words‚ not some sensationalist fringe theory. But that made no deference since the Big Tech’s all-powerful social media still “deplatformed” them. Now‚ in light of the discovery process in a major‚ related in context‚ case deliberated by the Supreme Court – Murthy v. Missouri‚ NCLA believes that there is reason to review Cingazi et al v. HHS as well‚ specifically‚ to ascertain if the district court (later supported by the Sixth Circuit) was right to dismiss the case without allowing discovery. And what NCLA has been presenting to the Supreme Court in the Murthy v. Missouri case is that “the government browbeat social media companies into censoring Covid-19 views of which the government did not approve.” The post Supreme Court Is Asked To Resolve Split Decision in Social Media Censorship Lawsuit appeared first on Reclaim The Net.