Remember Loy Brunson and the Brunson Brothers? Of course you do. Incredible family, incredible people. And of course best known for their incredible cases they’ve brought to the U.S. Supreme Court regarding the 2020 election, especially considering that Loy is NOT an attorney. Just someone who has actually sat down to read the Constitution.  Imagine that! There has been so much hope about the cases the Brunson Brothers have brought to the Supreme Court but then disappointment as they either get dismissed, sent back, or just plain ignored. So are they dead? I know that so many of you are wanting an update (me too!) and until now I haven’t had much to share with you. But I just came across a brand new interview Loy Brunson did just a couple weeks ago on May 25, 2024, and it comes with an incredible message of hope and optimism! Loy says the case is NOT dead. He says it could be picked back up by the Supreme Court at any time, it’s entire up to them and they could do it today, tomorrow a week from now, etc.  There is nothing stopping them from picking it back up. Perhaps….at the most ideal time possible? Oh my, wouldn’t that make for an incredible end to this movie! I’ll give you a bunch more information down below, but first watch this new interview: LOY BRUNSON DECLARES 2020 ELECTION FIGHT ISN’T OVER: SUPREME COURT CASE COULD CHANGE EVERYTHING! pic.twitter.com/g4oGjaL6Eo — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 6, 2024 The last update we had from Loy was back in May of 2023 and it actually comes from my interview with him. It was such a pleasure to get to chat with him and so informative! Much of this is still relevant, especially the letter writing campaign and I have all of those links for you down below. Supreme Court Compromised? Why Loy Brunson Still Thinks We Can Win! I had the true honor of speaking with Loy Brunson the other day on my show. What a class act and a brilliant mind. It was such a great time getting to chat with him and ask him a bunch of questions about his pending Supreme Court case. One of those questions that I asked him was: “if the Supreme Court is compromised in some way — either bought off, blackmailed, threatened or something else — how can we ever expect them to rule in your favor?” I thought his answer was brilliant. So was the entire interview. So in case you missed it, please enjoy this interview for his answer to that question plus a whole lot more. Enjoy: And a backup here on Twitter (which is now safe for Free Speech): EXCLUSIVE: update from Loy Brunson! #BrunsonBrothers pic.twitter.com/vwrtb64zlx — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) May 25, 2023 And on Rumble here: And as promised, here are the links you need: https://loybrunson.com https://7discoveries.com Please visit either of the websites listed above to join the Letter Writing Campaign! We are aiming for 100 million letters sent to the Supreme Court and we need your help! We need to show them that the majority of this country supports them and wants this action taken. So just like voting, your action here is so important and it will be added to many others! One voice alone is not powerful, but 100 million of us banded together can change the world! Please send your letter here! Want more? We’ve been covering Loy Brunson and his brothers for a long time, please check this out: INCREDIBLE: Meet Loy Brunson, One Of The Incredible Brunson Brothers! Have you heard a lot about the Brunson Brothers (I also call them the TRUMPet Brothers) Supreme Court case….but don’t know much about who they are? Same here. They kind of came onto the scene from nowhere (remember how Bo Polny keeps telling us it will happen “suddenly” and in a 24 hour period and how no one will see the plan coming? Well they certainly fit the bill!). But the funny thing is they had some relative fame already as TRUMPet players before doing any of this work with the Supreme Court. I’ve posted a little bit about their trumpet playing before, but now I want to introduce you to Loy Brunson, the Brunson brother who seems to be the Legal Eagle (not to take anything away from the other four). But OH MY is he incredible! THIS is what all of our elected officials should sound like! Can you imagine a Congress filled with 535 people like this guy? Our country would change overnight! We would be the shining city on a hill…the envy of all nations! And yet we can a fat buffoon who can’t even wear pants properly (you all know who I mean), pencil neck (you know him), bat-crazy Nancy and Chuckie Schumer.  Just to name a few. But you have to check this guy out… This may be one of the best videos you ever watch. Listen as he explains how the Constitution literally solves EVERY problem we have… Like taxes. Many of you know this, but we didn’t have the IRS until 1862! Our country served perfectly well — and thrived — for over 100 years without taxes! Why didn’t we have them? Because it turns out they are actually Unconstitutional! Brunson explains. It’s all right in the Constitution! He covers a ton of other topics too, but my favorite was his finding of what he calls the “Interpretation Clause” in the 9th Amendment. He says he was the first to discover it, and I think he’s right because I searched for “Interpretation Clause Constitution” and nothing comes up in search results. And yet, there it is plain as day….ignored for decades and centuries! We’re not a perfect country and the Founding Fathers were not perfect people….BUT….I do believe they were divinely inspired by God to write that document and you’ll be blown away as you listen to Loy Brunson explain more. Watch and enjoy right here: Backup on Rumble: Pass it around and let’s start waking some people up! And now if you want more on the Supreme Court case, keep reading… TRUMPet Supreme Court Case Moving Forward! TGP Confirmed! Several weeks ago, I was one of the ONLY websites to tell you about Brunson v. Adams, the Supreme Court Case that may upend the 2020 election steal. In fact, I was so early that many people doubted it was real. Our articles are ALWAYS real. If I can’t vet the article, I don’t run it. And this was 100% vetted by the best source possible: the Supreme Court website! That’s kind of what it means to be a journalist…. You take in all the information and sometimes you break the story! That’s what we did here. So much so that one comment I read to my article said: I don’t think it’s real, I haven’t seen the Epoch Times or Gateway Pundit cover it! Well….with all apologies to the commenter, the Epoch Times covered it shortly thereafter and The Gateway Pundit covered it today….again. I’m still waiting for my apology from the commenter (I forget who it was, they are not memorable) but I won’t stay up all night waiting. In all seriousness, the story is VERY real and very exciting! From my friends at The Gateway Pundit, here is Tim Canova: While there has been much public attention on the U.S. Supreme Court’s present consideration of the “independent state legislature” theory in Moore v. Harper involving North Carolina’s redistricting, that case would not immediately upend the 2020 Presidential Election. In contrast, a little-known case that appeared recently on the Court docket could do just that. The case of Brunson v. Adams, not even reported in the mainstream media, was filed pro se by ordinary American citizens – four brothers from Utah — seeking the removal of President Biden and Vice President Harris, along with 291 U.S. Representatives and 94 U.S. Senators who voted to certify the Electors to the Electoral College on January 6, 2021 without first investigating serious allegations of election fraud in half a dozen states and foreign election interference and breach of national security in the 2020 Presidential Election. The outcome of such relief would presumably be to restore Donald Trump to the presidency. The important national security interests implicated in this case allowed the Brunsons to bypass an appeal that was frozen at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit and get the case to the Supreme Court which has now scheduled a hearing for January 6, 2023. The Brunson Petition for a Writ of Certiorari would require the votes of only four Justices to move the case forward. It seems astounding that the Court would wade into such waters two years to the day after the Congressional vote to install Joe Biden as President. But these are not normal times. Democrats may well push legislation in this month’s lame duck session of Congress to impose term limits and a mandatory retirement age for Justices, and thereby open the door to packing the Court. Such a course would seem to be clear violations of Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution which provides that Justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behavior.” In addition to such institutional threats to the Supreme Court, several Justices and their families have been living under constant threats to their personal security since the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Perhaps these institutional and security threats have provided powerful incentives for the Court to put Brunson v. Adams on its dockets as a shield to deter any efforts by the lame duck Congress to infringe on the Court’s independence. Or perhaps conservatives on the Court are serious about using the Brunson case as a sword to remove public officials who they believe have violated their constitutional Oaths of office by rubber-stamping Electors on Jan. 6th without first conducting any investigation of serious allegations of election fraud and foreign election interference. Moreover, recent weeks have brought a cascade of news suggesting the likelihood of an impending constitutional crisis that could be difficult to resolve without the Court’s intervention. It is now clear that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was colluding with social media giants Twitter and Facebook to censor news of Hunter Biden’s laptop in the weeks leading up to the 2020 election – a most egregious First Amendment violation intended to rig the election outcome and perhaps to install an unaccountable and criminal puppet government. Meanwhile, the January 6th committee may soon send a criminal referral to the Justice Department to arrest President Trump even though his reinstated tweets are a reminder that he was not calling for insurrection but for peaceful protest on January 6th. More recently, the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) was reportedly working with Big Tech to censor election critics.   Supreme Court Justices may well see these approaching storm clouds and conclude that the Court’s intervention is necessary to prevent larger civil unrest resulting from constitutional violations that are undermining public trust and confidence in the outcomes of both the 2020 and 2022 elections. When criminals break the law — state and federal statutes — to rig an election, we are dependent on prosecutions by law enforcement agencies that have sadly become politicized and complicit. When they break the Constitution — the supreme law of the land — to rig an election, the only recourse may be the Supreme Court or military tribunals.   As the Brunson lawsuit argues, all of Congress was put on notice prior to its January 6th vote by more than a hundred of its own members detailing serious allegations of election frauds and calling for creation of an electoral commission to investigate the allegations. Moreover, the Office of Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) was required to submit a report on foreign threats to the 2020 Presidential election by December 18, 2020. That deadline was set by executive order and by Congress itself. When December 18th came and went without ODNI submitting its report, Congress should have started asking questions and investigating. In fact, DNI John Ratcliffe announced on that day that the 17 U.S. intelligence agencies he was overseeing had found evidence of foreign election interference but were split as to its significance and whether such breach of national security was sufficient to overturn the outcome of the election. And yet there was no action whatsoever by Congress, no inquiry and no investigation. Instead, Congress approved the possibly fraudulent election results on January 6th without asking any questions of the DNI and the Intelligence Community. When the results of the 1876 presidential election were in doubt, Congress created a special Electoral Commission made up of five House members, five Senators, and five Supreme Court Justices to investigate. In contrast, in early 2021 Congress had nearly two weeks to investigate before the January 20th date of the Presidential Inauguration. Had Congress waited even just one more day to January 7th, they would have received the long-awaited ODNI report reflecting a split in the Intelligence Community and the DNI’s own conclusion that the People’s Republic of China had interfered to influence the outcome of the presidential election. As Dr. Barry A. Zulauf, the Analytic Ombudsman for the Intelligence Community, concluded at the time, the Intelligence Community shamefully delayed their findings until after the January 6th Electoral College certification by Congress because of their political disagreements with the Trump administration. This paints a picture of collusion and conspiracy involving members of Congress and U.S. intelligence agencies to coverup evidence of foreign election interference and constituting the crime of High Treason. The Brunson lawsuit does not claim the election was stolen, merely that a large majority of Congress, by failing to investigate such serious allegations of election rigging and breaches of national security, violated their Oaths to protect and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic – an Oath also taken by Supreme Court Justices and members of the U.S. military.

Former Attorney General Bill Barr joined Fox News to give his take on Trump’s criminal charges. Barr who was an attorney under the Trump administration before being forced to resign, told Fox News host Jimmy Failla “When people were talking about it, I said that the case was an abomination, and I didn’t think it was going to be brought at the end of the day because it was so vaporous.” “I was surprised they went ahead with it… it was an abomination,” added Barr. Barr concluded his thoughts about Trump’s charges by sharing, But you think about, how are the American people going to react in a very close election if Trump loses and this case is overturned – which it will be, this case will be overturned.” Bill Barr says no crime was committed, verdict will be overturned before election pic.twitter.com/LpGqjTz2J1 — Daily Caller (@DailyCaller) June 5, 2024 Former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts Trump’s criminal charges will ‘be overturned’https://t.co/VUjVY0z34P — tucson bob (@tucson_glock) June 6, 2024 Check out what Yahoo News reported: Former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr joined “Fox Across America” on Wednesday to share his reaction to President Trump’s being found guilty on 34 counts of falsifying business records. “When people were talking about it, I said that the case was an abomination, and I didn’t think it was going to be brought at the end of the day because it was so vaporous,” Barr told Fox News host Jimmy Failla. “I was surprised they went ahead with it… it was an abomination. And everyone’s talked about that. But you think about, how are the American people going to react in a very close election if Trump loses and this case is overturned – which it will be, this case will be overturned,” he said. Barr, who served as the attorney general during the Trump administration, also commented on how Trump’s verdict could impact his 2024 presidential campaign. “It’s unfair to the voter. And, you know, the co-conspirator in all of this is the mainstream media. Yeah. Who will not talk about the issues or give honest reports on anything,” he said. NEW- Former Attorney General Bill Barr predicts Trump’s criminal charges will ‘be overturned’ https://t.co/lbVsIqqH8N — Overton (@OvertonLive) June 6, 2024 Per Overton News: Former U.S. Attorney General Bill Barr discussed President Trump’s guilty verdict on 34 counts of falsifying business records on “Fox Across America,” calling the case “an abomination” and predicting it will be overturned. Barr criticized the media and justice system’s bias, noting the unfair impact on voters and contrasting the treatment of Trump’s case with Hunter Biden’s laptop controversy. The verdict has polarized opinions, with some former Democrats now viewing Republicans as less of a threat to democracy. Barr emphasized the unprecedented nature of a major candidate being unable to defend himself due to legal restrictions.

The following is mostly a summary of Jack Posobiec’s commentary below, but the Sentinel agrees. One party is locking up the other party. Wake up. Steve Bannon will begin serving his four-month sentence on July 1. He will not be able to campaign until November 1st. The election is November 5. Bannon still has appeals, […] The post Steve Bannon Sentenced to Prison for the Entire Campaign appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Joy Behar claimed on Thursday that Americans had saved France — and saved the world — during World War II only to throw it “down the toilet” if they elected former President Donald Trump to a second term. Behar joined twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton — who lost to Trump in 2016 — in comparing the very real threat posed by Adolf Hitler and his Nazi regime to another Trump presidency. Whoopi Goldberg kicked off the conversation on “The View,” commemorating the 80th anniversary of D-Day by lamenting the fact that the younger generations do not understand what really happened during World War II. Goldberg herself was previously suspended from the show for claiming that the Holocaust was “not about race.” WATCH: Leave it to Joy Behar to make D-Day about Trump: “We saved France…saved the world..and for us to be throwing it down the toilet to a convicted felon…Today is the day to reflect on what we have in this country and what we could lose very easily if we don’t watch it.” pic.twitter.com/c9lbQevkiX — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) June 6, 2024 Behar followed that with her assessment: “When I was there, I had a guide who was French, and I said to him, ‘We save France,’ and he said, ‘You saved the world. You saved the world.’ And that is the most touching thing that anybody has ever said to me about this country.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP But then Behar pivoted, saying, “And for us to be throwing it down the toilet to a convicted felon, to somebody who was liable for rape, who lies and cheats —” Sunny Hostin briefly corrected Behar, saying that Trump was not held liable for rape but for sexual abuse. “— sexual harassment, whatever it is,” Behar continued, trotting out the claim that Trump had referred to American service members as “suckers and losers.” “Today is the day to reflect on what we have in this country and what we could lose very easily if we don’t watch it,” she concluded.

Singer Miley Cyrus said she’s not sure she ever wants to become a mom but mentioned that she considers her fans to be stand-ins for children anyway. The 31-year-old celebrity made the remarks during a recent interview with W Magazine released this week.  “I love being an adult,” Cyrus told the outlet. “I have a rule that I don’t look up or don’t look down at anyone. I just look, which allows me the clarity to see the world for what it really is and people for who they really are.” She added, “I look at myself almost every day in the mirror and I say, ‘I am a woman.’ I’m 31 now, and I still don’t know if I want kids or not. I feel like my fans kind of are my kids in some way. I’ve heard Dolly [Parton] say that too, because she didn’t have kids.” The “Flowers” singer mentioned at another point in the conversation how other artists frequently refer to themselves as “mother” in relation to their fans and that the fans say the same.  “The word ‘mother’ is the most all-encompassing word,” she said. “The mother can be [drag queen] RuPaul; the mother can be Beyoncé. Our fans call us ‘mother.’” Cyrus said, “With the word ‘mother,’ we can talk about the planet, we can talk about agriculture, we can talk about medicine, we can talk about injustices, reproductive care.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP This isn’t the first time the recording artist brought up her feelings about motherhood. In 2019, she told Elle that she wasn’t happy with how women were pressured to have kids.  “We’re expected to keep the planet populated. And when that isn’t a part of our plan or our purpose, there is so much judgment and anger that they try to make and change laws to force it upon you — even if you become pregnant in a violent situation,” Cyrus said. “If you don’t want children, people feel sorry for you, like you’re a cold, heartless b*tch who’s not capable of love.” She continued, “We’ve been doing the same thing to the earth that we do to women. We just take and take and expect it to keep producing. And it’s exhausted. It can’t produce. We’re getting handed a piece-of-shit planet, and I refuse to hand that down to my child,” she said.  “Until I feel like my kid would live on an earth with fish in the water, I’m not bringing in another person to deal with that.”

Has your heart been troubled? Have you been in a place of grief or despair or crying out to the Lord?