'Drug deal gone bad'

'she did not feel safe in her hijab'

Small Business Administration chief Kelly Loeffler, at a House Republican news conference on Monday, warned of the adverse effects the federal government shutdown is having on the economy. The SBA administrator’s comments came as the shutdown approaches the one-month mark. “The SBA’s loan-guarantee programs have been halted, and main street’s capital has been choked off, because Senate Democrats are playing politics with lives and livelihoods. They’re demanding $1.5 trillion in taxpayer money to fund health care for illegal aliens and other liberal causes,” Loeffler explained at the House press event. The former Georgia senator’s private sector concerns were coupled with the pain faced by thousands of federal employees who face uncertainty about when they will be allowed to resume working—and get paid. “Last week, 1.4 million federal workers missed a full paycheck. Now you know, many of them are furloughed, and many more are deemed essential workers—those who are essential, for example, to keep the country safe. [Transportation Security Administration] agents, we’ve discussed air traffic controllers and Border Patrol and, of course, our troops, but so many of them now are going without pay,” Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., noted at the conference. The speaker added: “The families of military service members and air traffic controllers and so many of these others are now at very real risk of missing the paycheck at the end of this month, the Trump administration has done everything possible to bend over backwards to try to find sources of funding within the federal government to be able to cover the bases.” Johnson added that even as the shutdown drags on, Democrats appear to care more about endorsing the far Left flank of their political party than providing a way forward for the millions of Americans affected by Congress’ inaction. “The House Democrats have chosen a side they were forced to by that far Left they’re so terrified of, and they’ve shown the world what they really believe. There is no longer a place for centrists and moderates in their party. The candidate that they have endorsed, [New York City mayoral front-runner Zohran] Mamdani, is somebody who we’ve talked about a lot from this podium,” the Louisiana lawmaker said. “He sympathized with Hamas and openly embraced antisemitic language. He has called to, quote, ‘seize the means of production.’ Because he is a Marxist. He’s called to abolish our borders, to abolish and end immigration enforcement, to defund the police and to legalize prostitution. Among a long list of hits that I can share with you, Zohran Mamdani is expected to take the helm of one of the most important cities in the world, the largest city in America, and he now has the full blessing of the Democrat leader in the House of Representatives,” Johnson said, the latter being a reference to House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. Rep. Roger Williams, R-Texas, the chairman of the House Small Business Committee, challenged Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., to observe how the small businesses in his state were doing. “Take a look at the small businesses in your district or in New York, Sen. Schumer. Tell them that you don’t care about them. Tell them you don’t care if they meet the payroll. Tell them you don’t care if they hire workers, and see how that goes,” Williams said. The post Small Business Chief Details Spillover Effects of Shutdown on Economy appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Why is the Democrat Speaker of the Virginia House of Delegates calling a special session of the Virginia General Assembly now, a week before Election Day? Speaker Don Scott and the Democrats are trying to begin a multi-year process to redistrict the commonwealth’s 11 congressional districts to create more Democrat-leaning districts for the 2026 congressional midterms before they potentially lose the House of Delegates in next week’s elections. >>> Sign up for our Virginia email newsletter Small problem, though: A constitutional amendment in 2020 established a bipartisan redistricting commission composed of state legislators and citizens. A decision to go around that commission to redraw districts must ultimately go in front of voters. And in a twist, a special session of the General Assembly pulls the Republican gubernatorial candidate, Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears, off the campaign trail right before the election. Virginia Republican state Del. Tom Garrett sits down with us to tell us what the Democrats’ long- and short-term agenda appears to be. Listen here: The post Virginia Power Play: Democrat Speaker’s Push to Redraw Congressional Districts appeared first on The Daily Signal.

In the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s assassination, an Ohio state representative has an idea for how Kirk’s legacy could live on for generations to come. State Rep. Gary Click, a Republican, has introduced the Charlie Kirk American Heritage Act. According to the bill’s text, it will “permit teachers in public schools and state institutions of higher education to provide instruction on the influence of Christianity on history and culture.” The bill covers kindergarten through college. What’s in the Bill? Click drew a deeper connection to Kirk and his assassination while providing sponsor testimony, speaking to how such a death brought out what Click said was “a frustration of mine [that] laid dormant.” “The farther back you go in history … our history books talked about our Christian origins, the Christian heritage here in the United States of America. But the closer we get to the present, the more we see that the philosophy—not just the philosophy—but the historic facts have been omitted. They have been left out, and history is being rewritten,” Click warned. “That leads to, I think, a lot of hate, I think it leads to violence,” he continued, speaking to how he and others were “stirred” by Kirk’s assassination. “Charlie Kirk was known, obviously, for being a conservative. Charlie Kirk was also known for being a Christian, and Charlie often brought to light those historical facts from our history, and people didn’t like to hear that and I think that incited hate amongst some people, and that incited violence,” Click added. The written testimony from Click went further. “Charlie was always kind but direct. He welcomed conversation, especially with those who did not agree with him. Regretfully, many reinterpret alternate views as hate and cannot tolerate an opposing view. At the core of Charlie’s beliefs and hislove for America was his avid faith. When asked what he wanted to be remembered for, he said for his courage and his faith. Charlie understood that there was a connection between the historic roots of America which are inseparable from the predominant faith of our founding fathers. That is what he was killed for,” Click wrote. Redundancy and Other Complaints. Throughout his remarks about the bill, Click reiterated that teachers are already allowed to teach such Christian influence. His bill, he said when providing testimony, “does not create a new law, it clarifies the law,” pointing to comments from Gary Daniels of the American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio. Daniels in his opponent testimony described the bill as redundant. Click had a simple answer to Daniels’ charge. “If it’s redundant, it shouldn’t be a problem,” he offered. He spoke further to teachers being afraid as the reason why the bill is needed. “Well, I think it is necessary,” he said about his bill, “because there are teachers” who do feel intimidated, but are too afraid to come forward. “You think somebody who’s afraid of losing their jobs is gonna come here and tell you they’re afraid of losing a job because of this? Probably not,” he pointed out, though he does expect to hear from former educators. “It does not impose any regulations on teachers,” Click, said. “What it does is remove the invisible shackles that often hinder full transparency and the teaching of American history, We are not inviting instructors to teach doctrine or to proselytize, as some of the headlines already seem to imply. We’re simply affirming what is already in the law that exists,” He takes particular issue with headlines categorizing the bill as a Christian one rather than a history one, as he did when speaking with The Daily Signal. When asked if the confusion “further necessitates the bill,” Click told The Daily Signal, “Yes, absolutely.” Click revealed that he has talked to teachers. “I’ve talked to some of them, and I just know that they are concerned that if they cross the line,” they would get into trouble,” he shared, also acknowledging that “there is an animosity amongst the attorneys,” in addition to how schools and teachers “are risk averse.” Teachers Are Being “Shackled.” This idea about teachers being “shackled” was a prominent theme in Click’s testimony. “I think it’s time we make sure that we just unshackle our teachers,” he continued, “and let our teachers know that it is okay to teach the facts.” By addressing how teachers must be “unshackled,” Click also addressed what it is that his bill does not do. “We don’t want you proselytizing. In fact, I’ve had people ask me, ‘Representative Click, let’s put the Bible back in public schools!’ I said, ‘No, that’s not the job to teach the Bible. That is the responsibility of churches, or synagogues or mosques to teach religion, but to say, these are the historical facts that made America great, that made us the most exceptional nation on the earth, are totally legitimate things to be taught.’ That’s what the Charlie Kirk American Heritage Act does, is it unshackles teachers to say you can teach these things, it is legal to teach these things, it affirms what we already know to be true, and it dispels some false notions about the separation of church and state.” Stay tuned for part two of our conversation with Click, including how those “false notions about the separation of church and state” fit into the necessity of this bill. The post New Bill in Ohio Could Help Charlie Kirk’s Legacy Live On appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Dog attacks during walks happen more often than most pet owners realize. According to the American Veterinary Medical Association, approximately 4.5 million dog bites occur annually in the United States. A dog safety stick offers reliable protection when facing aggressive animals. We at DogingtonPost believe every dog walker should know proper techniques for using these defensive tools effectively and legally. What Makes a Dog Safety Stick Effective A dog safety stick creates a physical barrier and visual deterrent that establishes distance between you and an aggressive animal. These devices typically measure 36 to 48 inches in length, which provides optimal reach without compromising maneuverability. The most effective models feature lightweight aluminum construction with non-slip grips and reinforced tips that withstand outdoor conditions. Traditional Walking Sticks vs Specialized Safety Sticks Traditional walking sticks serve dual purposes but lack specific safety features. Specialized dog safety sticks include ergonomic handles, reflective strips for visibility, and sometimes integrated noise makers or LED lights. Telescoping models collapse to 12-16 inches for easy transport, while fixed-length sticks offer superior durability. Professional dog trainers recommend fixed-length models because they provide consistent performance under stress. Essential Design Features That Matter Weight distribution affects usability during encounters. Quality safety sticks weigh between 8-12 ounces with balanced weight distribution from handle to tip. Textured grips prevent slips during wet conditions, while rounded tips reduce injury risk to animals. Some models feature wrist straps, though these can become liabilities during aggressive encounters if the stick gets grabbed. Legal Status Across Different States Most states classify dog safety sticks as walking aids rather than weapons, which makes them legal to carry in public spaces. However, California restricts certain tactical designs, while New York prohibits weighted tips. Texas and Florida have no restrictions on standard safety sticks (always check local ordinances before purchase, as city regulations can differ from state laws). The key distinction lies in design intent rather than functionality. Proper Selection Criteria for Maximum Protection Choose sticks with comfortable grip circumference that fits your hand size. Test the weight balance before purchase to confirm you can maneuver it effectively. Consider your typical walking routes when selecting between telescoping and fixed-length models. Understanding these fundamentals prepares you to master the proper techniques that make these tools truly effective in real-world situations, especially when combined with proper dog safety practices. How Do You Handle a Dog Safety Stick During Encounters Your dominant hand controls the stick 8-10 inches from the top, while your non-dominant hand grips the midpoint for maximum control. Plant your feet shoulder-width apart with knees slightly bent to create a stable foundation. This stance allows quick pivots while you maintain balance during unexpected movements. Deterrent devices rely on creating discomfort or fear in dogs, but proper training focuses on understanding and treating the real cause rather than using control or harsher tools. Master the Defensive Stance Hold the stick diagonally across your body at a 45-degree angle to create a barrier without you appear aggressive to the animal. Keep both hands firmly attached with your dominant hand directing movement and your support hand providing stability. Never raise the stick above shoulder height, as this signals aggression to dogs and can escalate the situation. Professional dog trainers emphasize that calm, controlled movements work better than frantic waves, which trigger chase instincts in aggressive animals. Deploy Strategic Deterrent Actions Use the stick when an unknown dog approaches within 15 feet while it shows signs of aggression such as raised hackles or direct stares. Extend the stick forward slowly while you back away at a steady pace, and avoid sudden movements that might provoke an attack. Combine this with a firm, low-pitched “No” or “Stay” command, as dogs can locate sounds and respond to human voice direction. If the animal continues its advance, tap the ground firmly with the stick tip to create noise and establish your boundary. Know When to Retreat Retreat becomes necessary when the dog shows multiple aggression signs simultaneously or when backup animals appear. Single deterrent tools become less effective against pack behavior, and your safety takes priority over maintaining ground. Back away slowly while you keep the stick between yourself and the threat, and avoid turning your back until you reach a safe distance (at least 50 feet from the animal). These fundamental techniques prepare you to select the right safety stick that matches your specific protection needs and walking environment. Which Dog Safety Sticks Deliver Real Protection The Cold Steel Brooklyn Crusher stands as the most effective safety stick for serious dog protection. This model weighs 2 pounds 7 ounces with 34-inch polypropylene construction that withstands aggressive encounters. The stick costs $45-60 and features an ergonomic handle that prevents slips during high-stress situations. The ASP Friction Loc Baton offers telescoping convenience at $85-120. This model extends from 16 to 26 inches with aircraft-grade aluminum construction. Professional dog trainers prefer the Monadnock AutoLock Baton for its one-handed deployment and secure lock mechanism (priced between $150-200). These models outperform cheaper alternatives because they maintain structural integrity under pressure. Quality sticks provide consistent performance across various weather conditions. Premium Features That Justify Higher Costs Quality safety sticks incorporate specific design elements that separate effective tools from decorative aids. Grip textures maintain traction when wet, as smooth handles become dangerous during encounters. Weight distribution should feel balanced when you hold the stick at the designated grip point, typically 8-10 inches from the top. Reinforced tips prevent breakage when you strike hard surfaces. Wrist straps create liability risks if an aggressive dog grabs the stick. The most reliable models feature simple mechanisms without electronic components that fail in cold weather. Where to Purchase Professional-Grade Equipment Purchase from specialized tactical retailers like LA Police Gear or Galls rather than general stores. These vendors stock professional-grade equipment that animal control officers use. Amazon carries consumer versions that work for basic deterrence, but serious protection requires investment in purpose-built defensive tools. Professional models cost $80-200 and perform when your safety depends on them. These retailers understand the difference between walking aids and protection devices (unlike general sporting goods stores that focus on recreational equipment). Final Thoughts Dog safety stick mastery demands consistent practice and proper preparation. The defensive stance with shoulder-width feet placement, diagonal stick position, and firm two-handed grip creates the foundation of effective protection. These skills become automatic only through regular practice sessions in controlled environments. Practice builds muscle memory that activates during high-stress encounters when clear thought becomes difficult. Professional dog trainers recommend weekly practice sessions that focus on stance transitions, retreat patterns, and deterrent commands. This preparation transforms a simple aid into reliable protection equipment (when you need it most). Confidence grows through knowledge and preparation rather than wishful thinking. Animals respond to confident body language and decisive actions more than hesitant movements. We at DogingtonPost provide comprehensive resources for responsible dog ownership and safety practices at DogingtonPost for expert advice on dog health, nutrition, and lifestyle topics that enhance the lives of dogs and their owners.

The Anti-Israel Left Announces a Boycott of the NY TImes

A less-than-impressive interview performance from House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on "Face the Nation" led many on the left to melt down on social media.Host Margaret Brennan forced Jeffries to answer a question about the hypocritical framing of rigged elections and redistricting in the midterm elections. Many believed Brennan had been ordered to be tougher on Democrats in the wake of Free Press founder Bari Weiss being hired to lead CBS News.'How do you justify using that now? Doesn't that undermine faith for voters you need to show up?'"You said, 'Democrats, there are no election deniers on our side of the aisle,'" Brennan said Sunday."You said that back in January. But recently, you've been using the term 'rigged elections' in reference to the upcoming midterms," she added. "Democrats were appalled when President Trump used language like that. How do you justify using that now? Doesn't that undermine faith for voters you need to show up?""No, I've been using that term in the context of Donald Trump's unprecedented effort to gerrymander congressional maps in a partisan fashion all across the country in order to rig the midterm elections and deny the ability of the American people to actually decide who should be in the majority as it relates to the House of Representatives," Jeffries responded.Brennan interrupted and contradicted Jeffries."You know Democrats are also going through gerrymandering and redistricting," she said."No, no, no," Jeffries responded. "Democrats are going to push back aggressively to make sure that we have fair maps across the country, not partisan gerrymandering, which Republicans have initiated in state after state after state."While the episode merely represented a small burst of fair-minded journalism on Brennan's part, many on the left fell into hysteria and panic over the unexpected blow.RELATED: Liberal meltdown ensues after Supreme Court announces it will hear Trump immunity case: 'Just plain terrifying' "Really shameful from @margbrennan," Keith Olbermann replied. "Never talked like that to any MAGA liars she's platformed but happy to do it to Jeffries in an attempt to get Bari Weiss to NOT fire her. Just vacuous and amoral.""Scary. After Bari Weiss's takeover of CBS, Margaret Brennan sounds like a Newsmax host in this interview with Hakeem Jeffries," attorney Kaivan Shroff responded."Margaret Brennan's hostility toward Jeffries compared to her deference toward Bessent and Graham demonstrates the chilling authoritarian takeover of CBS," one response reads."Totally inappropriate Margaret. There was no reason to speak like that to Jeffries," another detractor said. "I guess we know where you got your orders from. I was hoping changes would not happen under Bari. I guess I was wrong. Sorry but I will no longer be watching you or this show."The entire Jeffries interview can be viewed on the show's YouTube channel.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

JD Vance BLASTS Mehdi Hasan Claiming to Be the 'Real Victim' of Charlie Kirk's Assassination

This New Weapon May Be Able to Neutralize an Enemy's First Strike