Impact on the 2024 election

So what are hospitals doing with that taxpayer-sponsored windfall?

Larger bipartisan effort to reduce the country's reliance on Russia

The boat is currently about a year behind schedule

Ghost is a Swedish rock band formed in 2006 in Linköping‚ Sweden. Known for its unique theatrical stage presence and anonymous identities‚ the band’s members traditionally perform under the guise of the Nameless Ghouls and are led by a character known as Papa Emeritus. Ghost has released several albums since their inception‚ achieving significant chart success and receiving various awards‚ including a Grammy. Their music‚ a blend of heavy metal‚ rock‚ and pop with lyrical themes often revolving around Satanism and horror‚ has garnered a diverse fanbase and critical acclaim. Tobias Forge Tobias Forge‚ the band’s founder‚ is the creative The post Complete List Of Ghost Band Members appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.

Hold your breath. Make a wish. Count to three. I have never written about Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. This is perhaps not relevant by itself—it’s not as though it’s important for film critics to write about any and every movie that holds significance to them personally. But it occurred to me that there might be a subconscious factor to my silence all these years‚ namely: Do you want to invoke the fey all willy-nilly when you write? Does that seem like a good idea? As is always the case when book-to-screen adaptation is invoked‚ there’s a fight to be had about which version of a story or character is “best‚” and I’ll admit to my own waffling over the years where that question is concerned. People who love books may feel duty-bound to say that the book is best‚ and any adaptation that hews closest to the book is therefore the best adaptation. By this logic‚ Tim Burton’s Charlie and the Chocolate Factory would hold that place—an argument that I used to make because it felt like sheer sacrilege to suggest otherwise. But then I remembered that I’m not much for the concept of sacrilege‚ and finally came back around to my truest opinion on the subject: 1971’s Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is the best version of Roald Dahl’s story. Including the one that Dahl wrote. My reasoning is simple as this: Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is not a tale about a poor boy being secretly tested by a zany nightmare entrepreneur who hopes to find an heir to his money-making empire of very cool candy. That’s the book that Dahl wrote‚ certainly‚ and it might be the film that some people think they’re watching‚ but they’d still be wrong. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is a story about what happens when you willingly step into the fairy circle and engage with every single aspect of the territory beyond because you’re a child and none of your guardians were knowledgeable enough to tell you the rules. It’s about modernity coming up against things it no longer remembers or understands. It’s about the dangers of forgetting in a world that is rapidly filling up with distractions and frivolities. It transcends its original parameters by every measure. And we got one of Gene Wilder’s most iconic performances out of it‚ from a man whose career is entirely made of iconic performances. So how were we lucky enough to get this movie? While Dahl received credit for the film’s screenplay‚ he left early in the process due to creative differences‚ and his largely unfinished script was completed by David Seltzer in an uncredited rewrite. Yes‚ that’s the guy who went on to write The Omen and its many sequels. Which is relevant because there’s a genealogy at work here‚ and horror and fairy tales are never far apart on that family tree. (There were also scenes added by Robert Kaufman to add humor to the Golden Ticket frenzy.) Dahl disowned the film‚ thinking it sappy and sentimental—which is perhaps the strangest complaint of all because aside from a (slightly) sweeter end-point‚ the film doesn’t deviate from his basic plot much. Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory stands tall over half-a-century after its release because it parodies the time period it was created in so completely that it renders the era into fantasy landscape: drab newsrooms with murmuring anchormen‚ sardonic computers who defy their inventors‚ grimy cop show side plots where distraught and beautiful housewives consider giving up their husbands for a case of Wonka bars‚ and an opening number that promises literal showers of gum drops and snappy tunes from the neighborhood candy-slinger. I was born well after the film’s release‚ and watching it at a remove becomes a different kind of immersive experience: You’ve stepped into a different world long before you arrive at the factory. But once the tickets are awarded and the plot set in motion‚ we’re in the realm of Willy Wonka and his musical troop of Oompa-Loompas—and it all begins with an act of hypnotism. Fans of the film are likely aware that Gene Wilder wouldn’t accept the role unless he was allowed the entrance we see: Wonka limping out with a cane that he subsequently loses‚ before falling into a somersault and leaping up to applause. The child actors were not informed of this ploy to get genuine reactions‚ and Wilder wanted this moment to create a sense of distrust between the character and audience. But what’s arguably more important is that the entrance is so heightened that it’s easy to forget everything else going on. You’ve been captivated by the performance‚ and so you follow along. And immediately following the hypnotism… we sign a contract. Screenshot: Paramount Everyone knows you don’t sign contracts with the fey. You don’t make agreements‚ you pay attention to wording‚ and you certainly don’t give them your name in writing. And this is played off in the film as a jab at business dealings‚ with jokes about liability and accident clauses‚ but what’s more fascinating is that despite the reticence of the adults in the room‚ everyone ultimately agrees to the terms—and they can’t read the fine print. In stories about the fey‚ humans are only as safe as their own traditions dictate. There are rules passed down from elders and community to keep their people safe: Don’t step into a ring of mushrooms. Leave a dish of cream at the door. Throw spilled salt over your shoulder. And of course‚ if you find yourself in fairyland‚ never ever eat or drink anything provided. But Willy Wonka already has their names and the very first place he leads them to is The Chocolate Room‚ stacked floor to ceiling with edible landscape. He allows them to enter as he begins his next little hypnosis‚ in form of a song: Come with me And you’ll be In a world of pure imagination… It works on the audience even better than the tour winners. As the children and their parents gorge themselves on fairy food‚ Willy Wonka serenely kicks a few beach balls about and eats his teacup. All he had to do was be a little mysterious and entirely confusing‚ and ten people happily walked right in to his realm. The song is at once catchy and deeply affecting‚ the sort of tune that you come back to over and over. Songs are spells‚ of course. And then‚ after signing their names and eating the food‚ it all begins to go… squiggly. Augustus is first‚ sucked up from the chocolate river and propelled through a pipe. Before his mother can be taken off to find her son‚ we’re treated to the first Oompa-Loompa musical number. In the book‚ the preachy poems read as a checklist of everything Dahl finds wrong with “youths” today‚ and they go on endlessly to that effect. But the film gives these songs a parable structure that begins and ends the same‚ making the Oompa-Loompas themselves into Wonka’s own Greek chorus. There’s no emotion in their pronouncements‚ only observation and some acrobatics. Screenshot: Paramount Next up is the river boat sequence‚ which manages more articulate horror than the genre often produces. And it’s relevant that this tends to be the scene that haunts people the most after viewing. All of Dahl’s complaints at the saccharine atmosphere seem comical when you consider that arguably the film’s most famous moment is Wonka humming an eerie poem that raises steadily in pitch and fury while grotesque imagery plays out on the tunnel walls and psychedelic color schemes whirl across the actor’s faces. That is what sticks in the viewer’s mind. And it sticks because it hacks at the deepest truth of the film: You should not feel safe here. Wilder’s delivery throughout the film only speaks to this reading. Of course his comic timing can’t be matched‚ but he takes Wonka’s lines and delivers them as though he’s only barely interacting on this plane‚ and then only when he feels like it. Seltzer added a running gag that has Wonka constantly quoting from literature‚ which fits the schema perfectly—as though Wonka is trying to convince everyone of his incredibly human bonafides. He doesn’t understand these people‚ and he doesn’t much care to‚ but he would like them to possibly stay forever in a hell of their own making. The children each succumb‚ falling like so many candy dominoes‚ and the fault for this does lie squarely at their parent’s feet… but not for the reasons that original story would have us believe. Each child is saddled with attributes that we associate with the modern world: mindless excess (Augustus)‚ spotlight-seeking through obnoxious behavior (Violet)‚ instant gratification (Veruca)‚ and media inundation (Mike). How could any of these children be prepared for magic? The world has moved away from its protective superstitions—it only believes in capitalist might now. And Willy Wonka has a whole factory full of that. What makes Charlie special in all of this is his kindness‚ certainly‚ but it’s also his reason for putting his name on that contract. As Grandpa Joe tells him: “Sign away‚ Charlie‚ we’ve got nothing to lose.” Charlie and his family can’t sink any further. They can’t have any less. They have no reason not to follow through and see where it leads. And where it leads is a room full of secrets that turns Violet into a blueberry; a sneak sip of fizzy-lifting drink that almost get him and Grandpa Joe killed by the world’s most dramatic ceiling fan; a cadre of geese laying golden eggs that lead Veruca down the garbage chute; and Mike Teevee’s final performance as the world’s smallest boy sent directly to your television screens. Charlie only winds up the last kid standing because he picked the mildest form of disobedience… or perhaps because he was clear-eyed enough to avoid the fate that came with it. Unlike the book and other adaptations‚ Wonka only insists verbally that the children will be fine as each one of them is hauled off in turn for their missteps; we never see any of them again‚ or their parents. Are we meant to take the candyman at his word? Believe that they all got home safe and sound? As we’ve been shown from his first steps on screen—he shouldn’t be trusted. Screenshot: Paramount Perhaps the end is a touch sweetened because Gene Wilder is a lovable guy‚ even when he’s embodying otherworldly forces beyond our comprehension. But the final scenes of the film never struck me as particularly uplifting‚ aside from Charlie and his family being hauled out of poverty. What Wonka offers is merely the opportunity to do as he says: Charlie will inherit the factory‚ but only after he’s been molded in his creator’s shape. Otherwise‚ the secrets won’t be his. So Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory is magical and joyful and wacky and a perfect family film. But that’s not the reason I come back to it over every other version of this story that exists. I come back to it because it’s much screwier than all that. In the end‚ I’m reminded of the final lyric in the opening number‚ “The Candy Man”: The Candy Man can ‘Cause he mixes it with love And makes the world taste good And the world tastes good ‘Cause the Candy Man thinks it should… Not because we deserve a nice world‚ or because he cares about us. Just because he thinks it should. There’s no kindness in that thought‚ no benevolence. Only the power to make what you want reality.

If you just can’t get enough of the Wheel of Time—the books‚ the Prime Video series‚ the in-development animated film—you’re in luck‚ because there’s more coming. Not one but three prequel films are (still) in development‚ and the first one‚ titled The Age of Legends‚ has taken another step toward production. According to Deadline‚ the film has found its director: Kari Skogland (The Falcon and the Winter Soldier). It’s been over two years since we heard anything about this trilogy; back in 2021‚ it was announced that Zack Stentz (Thor‚ X-Men: First Class) was writing the screenplay for The Age of Legends. Stentz is still attached‚ and Deadline has a slightly different description of the film: Set several millennia before the timeline of the books‚ The Age of Legends will chart the emergence of ‘the Dark One’‚ when the world descended into darkness and war. The film will delve into the corrosive nature of power and pride‚ as seen through the tragic tales of the Forsaken – once honored leaders who fell victim to the Dark One’s seduction‚ each personifying distinct elements of human weakness and ambition. The story will also portray the valorous sacrifices of unexpected heroes who rise against the Dark One to defend humanity in the face of overwhelming odds. Two of the producers on this trilogy‚ Rick Selvage and Larry Mondragon‚ are also producers on Prime Video’s The Wheel of Time. (Unexpectedly‚ Eva Longoria is also one of the producers.) In a statement‚ Selvage said‚ “This film is not just an adaptation; it’s an exploration of an original world that blends fantasy with elements of science fiction‚ and Kari’s mastery in storytelling is crucial for bringing Jordan’s vision to life.” Skogland directed all six episodes of The Falcon and the Winter Soldier‚ and has a few other SFF and/or actiony TV episodes under her belt‚ including episodes of The Handmaid’s Tale‚ The Walking Dead‚ and The Punisher.  She has directed feature-length projects before‚ but her recent work has mostly been episodic. No casting or production timeline has been announced.

Psychic connections and pink dolphins‚ jinn and keys‚ ghostly ancestors and distant futures. November was another month of great short fantasy‚ horror‚ and science fiction‚ so here are my ten favorites.   “A Review: The Reunion of the Survivors of Sigrún 7” by Lars Ahn Years ago‚ a crew of astronauts disappeared during a voyage to Mars‚ and when they returned‚ they were short a captain. The survivors refused to explain what happened‚ until controversial filmmaker Manuela Riviera locked them in a room together. Written as a review of Riviera’s documentary‚ this short story is just as secretive and full of implications as the film’s subject. It offers few answers and a ton of questions. Lightspeed Magazine (November 2023; Issue 162)   “Cherenkov Blue” by Charlene Brusso Poppy and their client‚ an elderly Mentor called Valentin‚ take yet another tour of Chernobyl‚ one of the “Big Mistakes trifecta” along with Three Gorges Dam and the “Orbital Whiplash”. Most do the tour remotely‚ but Valentin insists on going in person‚ despite the risk to their health. I think what compelled me about this piece was about the joys of taking risks and how sometimes it can be more fulfilling to do or see something yourself instead of processed through a screen. Nature: Futures (November 22‚ 2023)   “In Her Dreams‚ the River” by A. Y. Lu When her family migrates to space for a better life‚ Mi‚ the teenage daughter‚ is left behind on Earth as the ghost bride to three dead men. It’s her job to tend to their graves and honor their spirits to help them move on or at least not cause harm while they haunt a place. Watching Mi find peace and satisfaction in the life she’s given‚ even though it’s not the one she wanted‚ was a good reminder for me about my own life. Maybe we can take what we have and make it our own. Maybe we can learn to want new things. Maybe we can use what we’re stuck with as a launching pad to something better. Three-Lobed Burning Eye (November 2023; Issue 40)   “In the Shelter of Ghosts” by Risa Wolf A strange fungus consumes structures‚ except those haunted and protected by the spirit of an ancestor. Our narrator works at the agency who assigns what housing is left—“a steel warehouse”‚ “a stone mill house”‚ a shipping container‚ a treehouse‚ a ditch‚ etc—but in their freetime they’re rebuilding their father’s house‚ plank by plank. A bittersweet story about grief and familial bonds‚ of learning the difference between being unwilling to let go and finding strength in your ancestors. Diabolical Plots (November 1‚ 2023; #105)   “Stitch” by Kathleen Schaefer A father “stitches” or is psychically connected to his newborn daughter. Doctors understandably don’t want infants bonding with their adult parents that deeply‚ as it could negatively impact their learning and development. But Aden struggles with keeping his boundaries. Given the note the story ends on‚ I’d put this down as a cautionary tale. Kathleen Schaefer reminds readers of why parents should be friendly with their children but not try to be their friend. Your job is to parent; let them be best friends with their peers. PodCastle (November 14‚ 2023; #813)   “The Corruption of Malik the Unsmiling” by Naseem Jamnia ““JINN OF THE UN-GASOLINE‚” booms the voice no denizen of Hell wants to hear. “REFILL MY VEHICLE.”” A jinn decides to open a gas station in Hell‚ and a frustrated angel unexpectedly becomes a regular. Naseem Jamnia is great at writing in general‚ but especially the details. For lesser writers‚ they might be just throwaway gags‚ but for Jamnia they are an integral yet subtle part of worldbuilding. A fun‚ clever story about an unlikely friendship. The Sunday Morning Transport (November 12‚ 2023)   “The Curse of the Boto Boy” by Woody Dismukes Botos are said to be shapeshifters that can turn into handsome men who seduce women along the Amazon and Orinoco Rivers. They’re also an endangered species in a habitat being destroyed by dams and pollution. Woody Dismukes taps into folklore to tell a story about an outcast woman and her son‚ as well as the lengths a parent will go to to protect their child‚ even if the child doesn’t need it. A nice pairing with “Stitch”. Nightmare Magazine (November 2023; Issue 134)   “The Last Science Fiction Writer: A Hallucination” by Fábio Fernandes This intriguing story is a transcript of a 5000-year-old hallucination that “was recorded and coded into fungal patches…for use in ancient chemotelepathy systems.” The interview is complex and overlapping. Raymond‚ the person being interviewed‚ is a time traveler refugee of sorts‚ and their conversation is mostly about how the concept of science fiction has shifted over the centuries. This was just fun and textually satisfying to read‚ like tasting a new dish with a lot of interweaving and contradicting flavors. IZ Digital (November 2023)   “The Meaning of the Key” by Sonia Sulaiman “The woman leans out of her wheelchair and touches their dark hair fondly with a shaking hand‚ then gives them a large key carved from olive wood‚ saying‚ “Do not forget Palestine; promise me that.”” During a ceremony where honorary keys are handed out‚ antagonists try to diminish the existence of Palestine and the humanity of Palestinans. Then a miracle happens that challenges those oppressors. Sonia Sulaiman also made my October spotlight‚ but I couldn’t pass up this powerful story. If There’s Anyone Left (November 22‚ 2023; Volume 4)   “Yaka Mein Lady” by Vivian Chou ““The door to Chinatown is always open for those who are willing to find it‚” Mama says. “Just don’t let your brain cover it up.”” A woman can see the past‚ present‚ and future of an object. To treat her condition‚ her mother takes her to a Chinatown that no longer exists. This is such a lovely piece about ancestry and honoring your past by living the best possible present. The Chinatown in my hometown was also bulldozed about the same time as the one in New Orleans‚ its residents forced out and scattered to the winds even though they had been there since at least 1850‚ so this story stuck with me long after I finished it. Heartlines (November 2023; Issue 3)   Alex Brown is a Hugo-nominated and Ignyte award-winning critic who writes about speculative fiction‚ librarianship‚ and Black history. Find them on twitter (@QueenOfRats)‚ bluesky (@bookjockeyalex)‚ instagram (@bookjockeyalex)‚ and their blog (bookjockeyalex.com).

Although there’s a sliding scale for how scientifically accurate science fiction can be‚ it can seem pretty fantastical no matter where on that scale it falls. While a story may not have lightsabers or phasers‚ it can still include some technology that seems like an absurdity until somebody actually figures out how to develop it. But as unbound from reality as science fiction can seem... Source

Stefanik: Time to Defund the Rot in Higher Education -- Starting With My Alma Mater