prepping.com
The Ancient Lie That Built the Modern World And Why It’s Collapsing
Why Greek and Christian Ways of Knowing Clash at the Root
The fight between Christian and Greek ways of knowing isn’t some ivory-tower argument. It’s the ground war for truth itself.
These two worldviews don’t just disagree… they start from opposite poles. One begins with God speaking reality into being. The other begins with autonomous man trying to figure it out on his own. Van Til described it as if you were in a dark coal bin, on a black December night, looking for a black spot on a black cat that isn’t there.
Extremely important: That first step — that starting point — changes everything that comes after.
Why Understanding Greek Thought Still Matters
Two Paths to Truth: Greek philosophers search for knowledge through autonomous reason and observation, while Christian thinkers see understanding as beginning with God’s revelation in creation and Scripture.
The Greeks were the world’s first “professional” thinkers… Plato and Aristotle were basically the architects of reason. If you want to understand modern thought, you’ve got to visit their workshop.
But here’s what makes them fascinating: they built an entire worldview without any divine blueprint. No Bible. No revelation. Just human reason hammering away in the dark, trying to carve meaning out of marble.
Even centuries later, when Kant, Hegel, and the rest of the philosophical heavyweights came along, they were still living in a world already shaped by Christian categories… ideas about purpose, morality, and truth that had soaked into the language.
The Greeks didn’t have that. They thought in a world where heaven was silent. For them, God wasn’t a personality… but an artificial backstop… an unmoved mover. That’s what makes them the perfect case study for understanding the roots of anti-theistic thinking.
Plato dreamed in eternal Forms; Aristotle built systems of logic that still shape universities today. But the seeds of every “we don’t need God to know truth” idea were planted in their soil.
What’s Really at Stake
You might think calling Greek thought “anti-theistic” sounds harsh… after all, they talked about gods constantly. But their gods were nothing like the God of Scripture.
Their gods had some power in their eyes, sure… but not a Creator. Not sovereign. They were just bigger pieces of the same cosmic puzzle. No god stood outside creation holding it together. Nobody said, “Let there be.”
And that’s the test right there.
Every worldview answers one question first: Where does knowledge come from?
Did the Greeks believe truth flows from a Creator… or that man can discover it by sheer mental muscle? They picked the second option, and from that moment on, they set the stage for every humanistic philosophy that followed.
The Greek Idea of ‘God’
Let’s be clear… Greek “theology” wasn’t really theology at all. It was more like cosmic anthropology. Their gods were part of the furniture, not the carpenter who built it.
Take Aristotle’s “Unmoved Mover.” It doesn’t create anything. It just sits there — the universe’s final goal, not its source. The world doesn’t depend on it; it just spins beside it.
That’s lightyears from the Christian claim that God holds the cosmos together moment by moment.
Even the earliest Greek thinkers… Thales, Heraclitus… treated “god” like a poetic nickname for nature. Fire, water, energy — take your pick. The universe wasn’t made; it just is. Or, as C.S. Lewis has said later, it came out of an abyss. Man’s job was to decode it, no revelation required.
Why That Starting Point Controls Everything
Here’s where it gets interesting and very real: You can’t have two independent realities… one divine and one natural. Either God made and sustains everything, or He’s just another object inside the system.
Greek philosophy picked door number two.
Christians start with a dependent world held up by an independent Creator. The Greeks started with an independent universe and made God optional. It’s not a small tweak… it’s a tectonic shift in the foundation of thought.
It’s like building a house with no cornerstone. Looks fine at first. Then the cracks appear.
How the Greeks Thought We Know Anything
Plato said the real stuff wasn’t what you see or touch… it was eternal “Forms,” or ideals, perfect blueprints floating out there in some abstract realm.
To know truth, he said, was to remember those Forms. You weren’t learning; you were recalling what your soul once knew.
No Creator. No divine revelation. Just ideas and intellect.
Christian thought flips that completely. We don’t acquire knowledge because our minds are magical… we know because God speaks. He made a world that runs on order and meaning, and He made us in His image to understand it. Knowledge isn’t self-generated… it’s received.
Creation Changes Everything
Okay, if God created the world, then truth doesn’t come from dissecting matter… it comes from listening to the Maker.
The universe isn’t random raw material. It’s divine speech solidified into atoms and time.
I’m simply saying Adam didn’t wake up in a meaningless world. He opened his eyes in a world already dripping with purpose and words… the Word that made it.
Greek philosophy missed that completely. For them, the world was just eternal stuff endlessly rearranging itself. No beginning, no ending, no personal Creator, no obligation to anyone above autonomous reason itself.
Revelation: Words and World Together
The Bible says God reveals Himself in two ways: through the world He made and the words He spoke. Creation and Scripture… both from the same mouth.
Adam didn’t discover meaning. He inherited it. And humanity’s job ever since has been to respond to that revelation… to live in the world as hearers, not inventors.
Greek philosophy threw that out the window. They started from silence… assuming the universe had no storyteller. That’s not just a neutral mistake; it’s rebellion wrapped in pagan logic.
Final Thought: The Fork in the Road
Here’s the heart of it: The creation story isn’t a side note… it’s the foundation of knowing anything rightly.
Reject a Creator, and you’re left with man as his own authority, trying to build truth out of thin air. That’s not neutrality — that’s cosmic pride.
So it really comes down to this: Do we start with God’s revelation, or do we start with human assumption?
Pick your starting line carefully… because it decides your finish line, too.
One leads to light. The other, to an endless cycle of shadows.
New Posts (Home)
ChatBox
Popular Posts 
Game Zone
Top PodCasts
