by Matt Agorist, The Free Thought Project: A new Netflix documentary titled CHAOS: The Manson Murders, based on the book CHAOS: Charles Manson, the CIA, and the Secret History of the Sixties following the 20 year investigation of researcher Tom O’Neill shines new light on the connection between the Manson Family Murders and the CIA’s […]

by Daisy Luther, The Organic Prepper: Another great and favorite topic in the survival community is a matter of best caliber and weapon for SHTF, and ammo with most stopping power. Stopping power means how quickly and with few bullets you can make a threat unable to attack you or anyone else. I tell you […]

from World Alternative Media: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

It’s Friday afternoon, and for some reason this tends to be the time when I sometimes bring you a weird and wacky story! And right on schedule, this just came across my desk. Meet twins Bridgette and Paula Powers who speak almost entirely in unison. The sisters went viral after sharing their eye witness accounts of a carjacking to ‘7News Queensland,’ recounting the moment in almost complete unison. Watch this: Weird, right? Weird but real. Also, why does the one on the left look like she could be 60 while the one on the right looks like she could be 20?  And yet….also still look identically alike? Here’s more on the phenomenon: The Powers Twins: Speaking in Perfect Sync Bridgette and Paula Powers, identical twin sisters from Queensland, Australia, recently went viral after a television interview where they recounted a harrowing carjacking incident involving their mother. What captivated viewers was their uncanny ability to speak in perfect unison, mirroring each other’s words, tone, and even hand gestures. They explained that this synchronized speaking is not rehearsed but comes naturally to them, stating, “It just happens and we dunno why, but we have tried to talk separately but we’re not ourselves, it’s not us and it’s very hard.” Understanding Twin Speech Phenomena The synchronized speech observed in some twins can be linked to phenomena such as: Cryptophasia: A private language developed between twins, often unintelligible to others, arising from their close bond and shared experiences. Idioglossia: An idiosyncratic language spoken by only one or a few individuals, which in the context of twins, often overlaps with cryptophasia. These phenomena are more common in early childhood and typically fade as twins grow older and integrate more with external social environments. Other Notable Examples June and Jennifer Gibbons: Known as “The Silent Twins,” they developed a unique language and were known for their mirrored behaviors and speech patterns. Poto and Cabengo (Grace and Virginia Kennedy): American twins who created their own language, combining elements of English and German, due to limited exposure to spoken language in their early years. Here is Poto and Cabengo: Strange but true!

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass proposed laying off over 1,600 city workers as it faces a nearly $1 billion budget deficit. According to the Los Angeles Times, the budget proposal would reduce 5% of the city’s workforce. LA To Institute Mass Layoffs Of City Workers In Wake Of $1 Billion Deficit https://t.co/8ZgYnWU2D1 — zerohedge (@zerohedge) April 25, 2025 From the Los Angeles Times: At the Los Angeles Police Department, more than 400 workers would be targeted for layoffs, all of them civilians, according to figures prepared by city budget officials. The number of police officers would continue on its gradual downward trajectory, with new hires failing to keep pace with attrition. By July 1, 2026, the LAPD would have 8,639 officers — the lowest level since 1995, according to city budget officials. Five years ago, the department had about 10,000 officers. Last week, the department reported that it had 8,735. Bass, during her State of the City address on Monday, described the layoff strategy as “a decision of absolute last resort.” In recent weeks, she and other city officials have been lobbying Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state Legislature to provide a relief package that would stave off most or even all of those job cuts. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass on Monday proposed laying off more than 1,600 government workers in an attempt to close a nearly $1 billion budget gap pic.twitter.com/MgdkPIwPO1 — DailyJobCuts . com – Layoffs / Job / Economy News (@dailyjobcuts) April 22, 2025 REPORT: Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass Said Monday The City Faces A Near ONE BILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT AS TAXPAYERS FLEE.She Plans To Lay Off Over 1,600 Staff Members.Bass Is Seeking A State Bailout.No Word On Whether Activist Federal Judges Will Step In To Stop The Mass Firings! pic.twitter.com/OeHPvyCEAX — John Basham (@JohnBasham) April 22, 2025 Per Fortune: In an address to the city council, Bass called the municipal workforce the “city’s greatest asset” but said cuts were needed as City Hall wrestles with uncertainty in Washington, higher costs for worker salaries and benefits, a slowing economy, and the daunting work of rebuilding the affluent Pacific Palisades community. “We have a very difficult budget to balance,” Bass said. She called her decision to propose job cuts a “last resort.” David Green, president of Service Employees International Union, Local 721, which represents over 10,000 city workers, said the union would be looking for new funding sources and other alternatives to slashing jobs. “We’re not going to allow the out-of-touch bureaucrats … to balance the budget on the backs of city workers,” Green said in a statement. Late last month, Bass and the city council appealed to Sacramento for nearly $2 billion in disaster recovery aid as the city faces a projected deficit that Bass’ office pegged at nearly $1 billion. She plans to return to Sacramento this week to seek additional state funds that could reduce the proposed layoffs. WATCH:

As you may have heard, Donald Trump is planning to run for a THIRD term in 2028. Recently he told NBC news he’s “not joking” about the possibility. And it’s driving some people insane… The New York Times breathlessly reports, “It cannot happen.” While the Associated press agrees, “It would violate the Constitution.” But former White House Advisor, Jim Rickards says – it’s not as crazy as you might think. Not since the 1940s has a U.S. President served more than two terms. That’s when FDR – Franklin Delano Roosevelt – won his FOURTH consecutive election. Ever since, we’ve been told it will never happen again. But as we speak, the groundwork is being laid for a third Trump Presidency. How is this even possible? While no one knows exactly what Trump is planning… Rickards says his next move could make all the difference. President just made a brilliant move… Unlike anything we’ve seen in close to a century. It’s eerily similar to something FDR was able to accomplish back in the 1930s. Recently I sat down with Rickards to get the full story. As you’ll see, it traces back to the release of a massive national asset, worth an estimated $150 trillion. We’ve posted a replay of this interview online, which you can view free of charge. Just keep in mind, this is a time sensitive story – with major changes coming as soon as May 3rd. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)

As if selling Trump 2028 hats in his online store wasn’t a big enough hint that Donald Trump is planning to run for office again in 2028, Steve Bannon just picked up on another major hint… This seemed pretty obvious to me: President Trump Teases 2028 Run With New Hat — “Never Say Never!” But Steve Bannon explains he just spotted another massive clue.... Check this out: Bannon: Buried lede no one’s picked up on. I thought he was termed out. Not in his mind. The tax answer in @TIME interview ties straight to 2028. You think it’s random? @realDonaldTrump doesn’t do random. He dropped Trump 2028 merch the day the Time interview hit. That answer… https://t.co/sM00DObwsI pic.twitter.com/Gowb8JziEN — Grace Chong, MBI (@gc22gc) April 25, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: So the interview's also-- one of the things that's very important, two parts of the interview. President Trump, they talk about the tax increases, and President Trump, Newt Gingrich, and Grover Norquist is a lot more amenable to it in this interview. He kind of says it's the right thing to do. His only concern, his only concern is, hey look, we're gonna have to do something, and he's favorable to it. He says his concern still falls back to the Bush thing because it hasn't been properly explained. Bush raised taxes for everybody. This is a massive tax cut for people, and you've got to figure out how to pay for it. But the buried lead that people really haven't picked up on, he says it in context of Bush losing the election and how it would hurt President Trump politically on his own side. Politically, I thought he was termed out. Not in his mind. His answer on the taxes relates directly-- this is easy to overcome, very easy to overcome-- but it's in response to his running again in 2028. I don't think it's a random occurrence because President Trump doesn't do things randomly, that you launch the merch yesterday of Trump 2028 on his official, you know, merchandising store and tees and ball caps and other things, other swag. At the same time, knew that the Time interview would be out, would be out, would be out today. And then that answer-- anybody that's been involved in politics at all says, "Hey, this guy's thinking through his re-elect and seeing if this would hurt him or help him." Just saying, Trump 28, 2028 is-- it's happening. It's happening, and you can tell he's into it. He would never have answered that question the way he answered about taxes, which makes me feel good because on the tax side the math just doesn't work. Backup here with captions added if you prefer: Steve Bannon: Buried lede no one’s picked up on. I thought he was termed out. Not in his mind. The tax answer in TIME interview ties straight to 2028. You think it’s random? Trump doesn’t do random. He dropped Trump 2028 merch the day the Time interview hit. That answer tells you… pic.twitter.com/l1O4ct1uIS — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) April 25, 2025 How would that be possible? It's not crazy..... Read this: Here’s Exactly How I Predict President Trump Will Get His Third (Fourth?) Term… Here's Exactly How I Predict President Trump Will Get His Third (Fourth?) Term... We've been talking a LOT about a potential third (or would that be "fourth"?) term for President Trump this week. Yesterday I brought you this: President Trump Follows Up, Confirms He’s “Not Joking” About A Third (Fourth?) Term Now today we had this breakdown on legal options for how it could happen: Legal Analyst Explains ‘Loophole’ President Trump’s Lawyers Could Use for THIRD TERM (And Why He’s RIGHT!) What I want to do right now is break down exactly how I think this could actually happen. This is one of those articles you might want to bookmark and save, or maybe even print out.  I am going to do the same.  Because I have a feeling we might just be looking back on this in 2027 and 2028 and be stunned to see it play out before your very eyes. I want to be clear, this is pure (educated) speculation on my part.  Entirely speculation, but I cover these things for a living.  I live in this world and I feel like I have gotten to know President Trump very well over the past 10 years.  I know how he thinks and I know how he works. So here is my pure speculation on how I think this could play out and how I believe it's not far-fetched at all to believe President Trump could waltz into a third term. First, I'll tell you what I don't think is an option. I don't think parsing words in the 22nd Amendment is an option. There's a lot of speculation going around out there saying Trump's attorneys are parsing the language in the 22nd Amendment and focusing on the word "elected". The wording of the 22nd Amendment is actually quite clear and straight-forward. Here it is: Amendment XXIIPassed by Congress March 21, 1947. Ratified February 27, 1951. Section 1.No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once. But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term. Section 2.This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years from the date of its submission to the States by the Congress. Some people claim a workaround would be that JD Vance would run and Trump would be his Vice President and then JD Vance, once elected, would step down and Trump would take office by succession, not by "being elected". I think that's extremely flimsy and quite frankly just noise to distract people. I don't buy it. Mainly because the 12th Amendment expressly prohibits exactly that scenario, key part again in red: Amendment XIIPassed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804. The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; the person having the greatest number of votes for President shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in the case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President. The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States. So I think that's all just noise, designed to get people off track.  Sleight of hand, if you will. What I actually think will happen is much simpler. The cleanest and most fool-proof way to get this done is to simply Amend or Revoke the 22nd Amendment. There's no serious legal argument that that wouldn't work.  There's a process for it.  We've used that process 27 times to create 27 Amendments to the Constitution.  It works and it's available. In fact, the last one is not that old, being passed in 1992. The problem here becomes the fact that it's extremely unlikely in our divided modern day Congress, because Step 1 is a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, which is extremely difficult right now. And then step 2 is approval from three-fourths of the state legislatures (currently 38 out of 50 states). So you can see the challenge. This is where I see the grand plan come into play.... I have always believed that President Trump and team caught the 2020 election steal in realtime.  I believe that data is safely stored, either with Space Force or somewhere else. I believe President Trump knew he needed to win 2024 organically, the real way, with such a big win that no one could question it. I believe he knew that trying to release the data on the 2020 steal too early would have fractured our country, so that's why he hasn't disclosed it yet. And quite frankly, even now our country is still quite divided. But....imagine in 2026, 2027 or even 2028 if the IRS has been shut down, the Country is roaring again, all the violent migrants have been deported, America is healing, people are happy again, our food has been made safe again thanks to RFK and we literally think and feel better because we're no longer eating toxins, our country is rich again, we have Bitcoin and crypto reserves, we have a Strategic Opportunity Fund making money for Americans and maybe instead of making you annual April 15th payment to the IRS, maybe we all get a dividend check from the Opportunity Fund? Imagine THAT reality. Imagine a reality where even his haters have to say they've never seen America so strong. We are seeing the earliest of inklings of that happening with things like Bill Maher having dinner with President Trump at the White House. Folks, it's possible...I can see it!  I can see it in my mind very clearly. Now....imagine we're living in that reality and President Trump comes on TV suddenly one day to hold an emergency press conference. "My fellow Americans...." And then he rolls it all out.  The evidence of the 2020 steal.  Clear as day.  Irrefutable.  America is stunned as the reality sets in.  All of the information is sourced, verified and posted online for all to inspect. In the following days, his toughest critics examine it only to find its clear and indisputable. And then the reality sets in.... People start to piece it all together in their heads.  He's had this in his back pocket since 2020!  He didn't try to stay in power or remove Joe Biden.  He let the legal process play out.  He didn't want to send this country into a Civil War so he held it all back.  He dodged an assassination, he dodged four lawfare cases, and he won 2024 fair and square.  And now he's literally saved America and made us prosperous again!  Healthy again!  Safe again!  Rich again!  Happy again! That's exactly the moment that I believe there will be such a strong groundswell of support of people saying "this man was cheated out of a term in 2020.  He's done more than any other President, probably even more than Lincoln and Washington.  He deserves another term." I believe the people will also demand it of the politicians. And that's when I believe there will be such a groundswell of support that reaching those thresholds for a Constitutional Amendment will no longer look daunting. I believe we will roll right through them and you'll be looking at a new 28th Amendment and you'll be looking at President Trump for 2028-2032. Of course he'll have to run again and win, but I think that will also be the time when you'll see the first President to win all 50 states. Ronald Reagan came close, winning 49 out of 50, but I think you'll see the full 50/50 go red for Trump in 2028. So there you go! That's my theory and I'm putting it out there, putting it on paper for the whole world to see April 2, 2025. Check back with me in the future and let's see how I do, ok?

It’s been a very bad day for Susan Rice… She just got fired by Pete Hegseth who thanked her for her service but said “we’re going in a different direction.” Hilarious! Bye bye Sue! BREAKING NEWS: Pete Hegseth just FIRED Susan Rice from her DoD advisory position. Winning! pic.twitter.com/QuhFr01aD5 — Mila Joy (@MilaLovesJoe) April 25, 2025 We not only got rid of Susan Rice but also many more who were counteracting the efforts of Hegseth and Trump. Fired them all! BREAKING NEWS Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ended the service of all committee members on DOD advisory committees. This would include the seat held by Susan Rice. Hegseth thanked the members for their work but said changes are needed to align with the department’s new… pic.twitter.com/PdQUuFKOoU — Breanna Morello (@BreannaMorello) April 25, 2025 Add that savings into DOGE while you’re at it! Not paying someone who hates you, what a great concept! Here are more details, from the National Review: At the outset of the Biden administration, the director of the former president’s Domestic Policy Council, Susan Rice, was said by the New York Times to have been “charged with ensuring that the new administration embeds issues of racial equity into everything it does.” When all you have is a DEI hammer, “everything” looks like it’s ripe for bludgeoning. That maximalist outlook helps explain why Rice retreats to the language of Affirmative Action to describe her surroundings, both the things of which she approves and disapproves. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth finds himself squarely in the latter category, and Rice cannot seem to see any explanation for his elevation except his accidents of birth. “Well, if you’re a white male Christian cisgender macho MAGA man, you can be as dumb as a rock and be deemed qualified to serve as Secretary of Defense,” Rice sneered in an interview with No Lie podcast host Brian Tyler Cohen. “But let’s also be clear, there’s a serious point here,” she continued, as though she was kidding when she accused the defense secretary of benefiting from his gender, race, and sexual orientation. What followed was an entirely unsolicited defense of DEI: DEI has been used as a slur to suggest that anybody who might be a woman, might be a person of color, might be a religious minority, might have a disability, might be a religious minority, might be a veteran of Native descent, anybody who has benefited in any way, shape, or form from the notion that we all should be treated equally and that we should be viewed on the basis of our merits and not discounted because we happen to be a woman or happen to be a person of color. Anybody who fits the mold of somebody who is not a white Christian cisgender male, is by definition in this administration deemed inferior. That is the vast majority of the people in this country. That’s quite the accusation. It isn’t just that Trump officials and their political allies are imprecise when accusing their political opponents of securing stations that would otherwise have been out of reach absent DEI policy prescriptions — an amply supportable claim. Rather, Rice insists that the administration sees “the vast majority” of Americans as “inferior.” That sounds like the sort of discrimination that only properly educated and empowered bureaucrats can police — bureaucrats, no doubt, like Susan Rice. If Rice laments the extent to which the public came to recognize that DEI was less an anti-discrimination initiative and more an extortion racket, she should look in a mirror. Her contributions to that revelation were invaluable. “In the last 20 years,” Rice told a gathering of activists assembled by Al Sharpton’s National Action Network in 2023, “the U.S. had a GDP shortfall of $16 trillion due to discrimination against black Americans. If we closed our racial gaps, we could add another $5 trillion to GDP over just the next five years.” If you are curious where those staggering figures came from, don’t look to Rice. “That’s not my math,” she said. “That’s according to Citibank.” And as I mentioned, she is not taking it well… Check this out: Now-ousted Susan Rice is upset over her abrupt departure from the Defense Department. She claims that if you aren’t White and Christian, Trump won’t include you in his cabinet. Here are some non-White members of Trump’s cabinet with their religious affiliations: – Tulsi… pic.twitter.com/saKYF3m68M — Media Lies (@MediasLies) April 25, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Well, if you’re a white male Christian cisgender macho MAGA man, you can be as dumb as a rock, uh, and be deemed qualified to serve as secretary of defense. That’s apparently what we’ve learned from this episode. But but let’s also be clear. There’s a serious point here. DEI has been used as a slur to suggest that anybody who might be a woman, might be a person of color, might be a religious minority, might have a disability, might be a religious minority, uh, might be, uh, a veteran or of native descent— anybody who has benefited, uh, in any way, shape, or form from the notion that we all should be treated equally and that we should be viewed on the basis of our merits and not discounted because we happen to be a woman or happen to be a person of color— anybody who, uh, you know, fits the mold of somebody who is not a white Christian cisgender male, uh, is by definition in this administration deemed inferior. That is the vast majority, Brian, of the people in this country. Backup here if needed: Susan Rice Just Got Fired By Pete Hegseth and She’s Not Taking It Well pic.twitter.com/RK8tH32ISv — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) April 25, 2025 Share!