from Russell Brand: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Sean Hannity just got the honor of a lifetime…. Flying aboard Air Force One with President Trump for the historic Middle East trip, and interviewing the President at his iconic Air Force One desk as the plane was flying. What an incredible moment! Sean was clearly pumped as any of us would be: Saudi Arabia bound on Air Force One! Stay tuned for exclusive behind-the-scenes footage, along with some huge interviews. pic.twitter.com/o57FuqR6LW — Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) May 12, 2025 Here’s a 12 minute clip from the interview in case you missed it: TRANSCRIPT: Hi, thank you very much. Okay. By the way, we’re on a beautiful Air Force One. Uh, not a bad plane. Not bad at all, not bad at all. It’s a beautiful plane and we’re doing a lot of business. We have a lot of good things happening. No—okay, so this is an amazing week so far. You get a deal with China. I’m just gonna list it and then we can get into detail. India and Pakistan played a big role, hopefully the peace stands. You slash prescription drug prices—most favored nation—the American people will get first dibs in terms of prices. The last American hostage has been released. You’ve got—we’re on this trip to Saudi Arabia, Qatar. There’s not much going on in your life, is there? Well, I’ve been busy, but I’ve enjoyed it because we’re getting things accomplished, we’re getting things done. You know, you can have times when you’re working very hard and not getting things done. That happens too. But we’re getting a lot done. I don’t think there’s ever been a little period like this— with the potential nuclear war and the two countries. They have very good leaders, people I know very well, and yeah it was uh, it was a very important process. We got involved with India and Pakistan. You got involved early. Can you give us a little insight what happened behind the scenes? How were you able— Well, I didn’t like what was happening, and uh, you hear— you know, they’re two very strongly nu—nuclear countries. Powerful. Very, very powerful amount of nuclear too. Serious stuff. And if that ever started—boy, that’s the beginning of something that could be really bad. Even a minimal—minimal—you could have millions of people killed, and with one shot, two shots. And I just thought it was something we could get involved in, and uh, I did a good job. Marco did a good job, and JD did a good job. We sort of—we’re a team and we, I think, convinced them to let’s have peace and let’s go and make trade deals. If we can make trade deals, we’re like that much better than nuclear weapons. And uh, that was a great thing. And we did a good job with the Houthis—stopped with the shooting of the ships. They liked shooting ships down. That a done deal. ‘Cause there’s been conflicting reports that some of their leaders are saying, “Oh that’s not true.” Well, it is—with respect to America. Now you know, you can’t always count on somebody necessarily telling the truth, but their surrogates were very strong, very powerful. Had a very good relationship with them. You know, they’re tough fighters. They can take a lot of punishment. But uh, they uh, with respect to America, they say it’s true. So we’ll see. You’ll know—you’ll be the first to know, won’t you? Oh, I follow the news closely. I read everything. I think the biggest surprise from this weekend—it was a week ago Friday where I saw that China announced, quote: “If the president is serious, we will be willing to negotiate with him.” And Scott Besson, your Treasury Secretary, met with their representatives in Geneva on Saturday. On Monday, you’re announcing a trade—or actually on Sunday you announced a deal with China. Yeah. How did that happen that quickly? Well, they met on Saturday and Sunday and they had a deal pretty much from the beginning. It was the concept of a deal. And uh, you know, one of the things that, uh, as you know, it’s sort of a 90-day deal as we negotiate other aspects. But one of the things I think that could be most exciting for us and also for China is that we’re trying to open up China. Because as you know, many years ago we opened up the USA. Now it’s time for China to open up, and that’s part of our deal. And we’re gonna open up China. To me, that’s the most exciting part. But yeah, we made a deal. The relationship is very good. I’ve always had a good relationship with President Xi. It was interrupted because of COVID obviously. But uh, outside of that, I’ve always had a great relationship, a lot of respect for him. And uh, we’ll see how that all works out, but we have the confines of a very, very strong deal with China. But the most exciting part of the deal—we—it was mentioned, but we—we don’t talk about it yet. That’s the opening up of China to US business, and that would be like opening up a whole new world. And I think it would be even better for China. So I think we’ll be able to make that deal. I hope. At any point do you foresee yourself dealing directly with President Xi on the final details of this deal? Yeah, I could see that. I mean, I’m not sure that it’ll be necessary, but uh, that happened with the UK. We were close to a deal but we—we needed one point or two points, uh, on pork and ethanol. Okay? Two very different subjects. And I called up the Prime Minister—who’s an excellent man, Keir—excellent man. And uh, within about uh, three minutes, it was over. We made the deal. It was a good deal for everybody. And we have a lot of deals now. We have a lot of trade deals that want—I’d—I’d say virtually everybody wants to make a deal. Mm. When I first saw you—and thank you for letting us cover this report on this, from Air Force One— when I first saw you, I think you were more excited—or you were excited about the China deal— but prescription drugs, which has been very, very painful for a lot of Americans. Eighty percent of medications are created in America, and then we end up paying more for those medications. Foreign countries do not pay as much as we do. You said that is over. Can you explain why this is such a big deal? Well, for many years we were taken advantage of by other countries and the drug companies. But I blame the other countries in a way more—the European Union, et cetera. They were very nasty. Very tough to the drug companies. And uh, they would give them a very low price for drug costs in the European nations. And—when that price was given, that was it. They wouldn’t negotiate. They—they said, “Let America pay for the difference.” And this happened all over the world with other countries. And we had stupid people leading us, and especially over the last four years, and they wouldn’t do anything about it. And it turned out that we were paying—and sometimes you saw 10 times more for the same drug. Same drug, same company, same plant where they make it. Laboratory. And it got to a point where I said, “We’re not gonna do this anymore.” The pharmaceutical industry is very powerful, and probably the most powerful—considered the most powerful lobby. And uh, the Democrats were making it impossible to lower drug prices. They knew what they were doing. And uh, I instituted a most favored nations provision or concept, where we’re gonna pay whatever the lowest country pays in the world. So if it’s uh, the UK, which pays very low, uh, and any country—it could be any country—whatever the lowest price is. And drug companies have accepted it. Everybody accepts it. The Democrats never wanted to play ball. They never wanted to do anything. It’s the Democrats’ fault that people were being ripped off for years and years. And now I hear Democrats saying, “Oh, well we’re gonna now go for the bill.” It’s gonna be very hard for them not to approve the big beautiful bill that we’re doing. We’re doing the biggest tax cuts in the history of our country because uh, people are gonna be getting a 50 to a 90% reduction in drug prices—not a half a percent. I remember when I would fight so hard to get a half a point, and I actually had it down a half a point for one year. And I was so proud of myself, ’cause that never happened before. It was always going up. Drugs only went in one direction. That’s up. And now, after studying the industry—it’s a very complex industry—but I figured it out. And I said, “Not gonna happen.” But the Democrats fought very hard to keep the prices of drugs very, very high. They really are to blame for this, because they should’ve done something about it. And when the Republicans went with requests, they—they said, “We’re not gonna approve it.” And now we have a unified Republican Party, but I think the Democrats are gonna approve this bill too, because how are they gonna reject a 60, 70, 80% drug cut? I don’t think they can. Uh, I think it’s gonna be huge. The fact that these drugs are ma—uh, the creation of these drugs— I mean, these companies have to go through a very arduous process to get approval. That’s right—by the government. They spend billions of dollars. Um, and put aside whether or not, quote, “People demonize big pharma.” That’s separate and apart. However, we usually end up creating them, and then we end up paying 10 times more, which is crazy. Backup here if needed: SEAN HANNITY: Inside Air Force One! pic.twitter.com/H9NJSdcD9d — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 16, 2025 And full interview here: FULL INTERVIEW: Sean Hannity Interviews President Trump aboard Air Force One – 5/13/25 “You see Saudi Arabia and you see UAE and you see Qatar and they have these brand new Boeing 747s — and you see ours next to it.” “We’re the United States of America. I believe we should… pic.twitter.com/09l873KQf3 — AJ Huber (@Huberton) May 14, 2025 What’s funny though is that President Trump arguably had to take a “downgrade” to fly Air Force One, probably the only person on the planet who can say that! Because this is what TRUMP FORCE ONE looks like inside: Sneak Peak Inside “Trump Force One” Sneak Peak Inside "Trump Force One" Donald Trump is one of the few people in the world who have to take a "downgrade" when they start flying Air Force One. Why? Because "Trump Force One" is arguably much nicer and much more luxurious! Take a sneak peak inside right here: Check out President Trump's 100 million dollar jet. It's loaded to the max & it's sooooo cool pic.twitter.com/RsRqFpKJTp — ROCK ON OHIO (@ROCKONOHIO77) December 26, 2024 But I'm just getting warmed up, I have a bunch more to show you. The Nelk Bros were recently invited by President Trump to fly with him on "Trump Force One"....how cool is that? I can't even imagine! And since you and I may never get the same opportunity, I can give you the next best thing. An inside look from the Nelk Bros, who documented the whole experience. This is SO cool.... Enjoy: It's not the first time we've gotten a sneak peak into this bad boy... Here are two other peaks inside the beautiful private jet: TRUMP-FORCE ONE: Inside Donald Trump’s Insane Private Jet TRUMP-FORCE ONE: Inside Donald Trump's Insane Private Jet After the recent emergency landings with TRUMP FORCE ONE and JD Vance's plane, I thought it might be fun to revisit what's inside Trump's bad boy plane.... President Trump, widely known for his wealth and lavish lifestyle, is one of the wealthiest people in the world. No modern billionaire is complete without a private jet, and President Trump's private plane is among one of the world's most powerful and luxurious private jet aircraft. Dubbed "Trump Force One," the Boeing 757 jet has become iconic in recent years. Normally, the former President uses his smaller Cessna plane to get around–it's much more economical than flying a massive 757, but the Trump Force One has made several notable appearances, particularly at rallies. Take an insider's look at the luxurious Trump Force One: And Benny Johnson got to fly with him here: Beautiful plane! ? pic.twitter.com/R0qwtOQGel — Golden Advice ?????? (@RichardStiller4) April 2, 2024 CNN explained: A standard passenger Boeing 757-200 series has about 228 seats. Trump’s custom 757 features 43 seats – along with a main bedroom, guest suite, dining room, VIP area and custom galley. Several days ago, Jason Miller posted this update on Trump Force One successfully taking off from a frozen airfield in Green Bay Wisconsin. Don’t want to bury the lead here - we took off without a hitch thanks to an AMAZING ground crew in Green Bay and a FANTASTIC pilot on Trump Force One! https://t.co/lC0W2OzS3I — Jason Miller (@JasonMiller) April 3, 2024 According to Daily Mail, CEO Kevin Elliot had this to say about Trump Force One after President Trump made a surprise appearance in the iconic aircraft during the Huntington Beach Pacific Airshow: ‘We knew he (Donald Trump) was going to be out here. This all about airplanes and his plane, a Boeing 757, is the second most photographed of all time, right behind Air Force One. 'When it comes to rare airplanes, that’s about as rare as it gets... You could have heard a pin drop. It’s all about the planes and giving fans hours of fun.

Kash Patel made incredibly bold statements from 2020-2024 while he was essentially campaigning for the role of FBI Director in the even President Trump got back into office. And I think even Kash would admit if he were being honest that he let his rhetoric go a bit too far, creating unrealistic expectations that could never be met. Many claims of all the things he would do “on day one” like shutting down the Hoover Building and reopening it the next day as a museum: THIS is what WINNING looks like: “I’d shut down the Hoover FBI Building on DAY ONE and reopen it as a Deep State Museum…” -Kash Patel pic.twitter.com/28ttutWCLB — Liz Churchill (@liz_churchill10) January 30, 2025 People (rightfully) latched onto those comments, especially the ones about walking in on day one and starting a 24/7 declass, and starting with the Epstein Files. I was willing to cut him some slack and assume some of this rhetoric was just exaggeration, but when nothing happened after the first 100 days, I became critical as well. And I’m still critical, but credit where credit is due, it looks like he’s finally fulfilling the big promise to shut down the Hoover Building: #BREAKING: Kash Patel announces he is SHUTTING DOWN the FBI Headquarters in DC Turn it into a deep state museum, Director Kash! pic.twitter.com/bK6Mj20MMA — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) May 16, 2025 TRANSCRIPT: Kash Patel: Look, the FBI is 38,000 when we’re fully manned — which we’re not. In the National Capital Region, in the 50-mile radius around Washington, D.C., there were 11,000 FBI employees. That’s like a third of the workforce. A third of the crime doesn’t happen here. So we’re taking 1,500 of those folks and moving them out. Every state’s getting a plus-up. And I think when we do things like that, we inspire folks in America to become intel analysts and agents and say, “We wanna go work at the FBI ’cause we wanna go fight violent crime, and we wanna get sent down to the country to do it.” Mm-hmm. And that’s what they were doing. In the next 3, 6, 9 months, we’re gonna do that hard and— You know, I didn’t know that I was gonna do this, but I’m gonna announce it on your show anyway: This FBI is leaving the Hoover Building because this building is unsafe for our workforce. And we want the workforce— Dan Bongino:You just gave up a big nugget there. Kash Patel:We want— But we want the American men and women to know: if you’re gonna come work at the premier law enforcement agency in the world, we’re gonna give you a building that’s commensurate with that. And that’s not this place. Backup here if needed: A Bit Delayed, But Kash Patel Fulfills A Big Promise! pic.twitter.com/tNKoFTHthF — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 16, 2025 That clip is a teaser clip from Maria Bartiromo’s upcoming Sunday Morning Futures interview with Kash Patel and Dan Bongino. If this clip is any indication, it’s going to be an incredible interview! Here are more details, from Fox Business: FBI Director Kash Patel previewed his plans to relocate about 1,500 agents out of the law enforcement agency’s headquarters in Washington, D.C. In an excerpt of an exclusive interview with “Sunday Morning Futures” that will air this Sunday, Patel said the agency is reallocating its workforce around the country by moving those agents out of the J. Edgar Hoover Building, which opened in 1975. “This FBI is leaving the Hoover building because this building is unsafe for our workforce and we want… the American men and women to know, if you’re going to come work at the premier law enforcement agency in the world, we’re going to give you a building that’s commensurate with that, and that’s not this place,” Patel said. “Look, the FBI is 38,000 when we’re fully manned, which we’re not. In the national capital region, in the 50-mile radius around Washington, D.C., there were 11,000 FBI employees,” Patel said. “That’s like a third of the workforce. A third of the crime doesn’t happen here, so we’re taking 1,500 of those folks and moving them out.” “Every state’s getting a plus-up, and I think when we do things like that, we inspire folks in America to become intel analysts and agents and say, ‘we want to go work at the FBI because we want to go fight violent crime, and we want to get sent out into the country to do it,’” he added. “That’s what we’re doing in the next three, six, nine months we’re going to do that hard.” The FBI and the General Services Administration (GSA) have been looking at options for a new FBI headquarters for more than a decade, including locations near D.C. in Maryland and Virginia. Not everyone is impressed. My friend Mark Taylor was not amused, posting this on Telegram: I get it, and I think that’s a completely reasonable and rational take to have. As I’ve said many times, I’m skeptical because we’ve been burned over and over before, and I also know the FBI is still filled with many toxic employees, but I’m cautiously optimistic and this is a great sign things are starting to turn in the right direction. Do the Epstein Files next and bring some actual prosecutions and you’ll cement your legacies for all of history! RELATED REPORT: BREAKING: Kash Patel Says Jeffrey Epstein DID K*ll Himself BREAKING: Kash Patel Says Jeffrey Epstein DID K*ll Himself Well, this is certainly odd and troubling... One of the biggest and most repeated catchphrases over the past 5+ years has been "Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself." And yet today Kash Patel told Sen. Kennedy and the rest of Congress that he believes Jeffrey Epstein DID kill himself. Watch here: FBI Director Kash Patel claims Jeffrey Epstein did, in fact, hang himself in prison—while also revealing he’s working on a plan to release the full Epstein file. He says the release is coming in the “near future” and that the plan has been carefully built to protect the victims… pic.twitter.com/sLDQ8D9eq9 — Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) May 8, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Sen. Kennedy:Person with a brain and a beating heart. Yes sir. Um, did Jeffrey Epstein hang himself or did somebody kill him? Kash Patel:Senator, I believe he hung himself in a cell in the Metropolitan Detention Center. Sen. Kennedy:Um, are you gonna release all the information about that? Kash Patel:Senator, we are working through that right now at the Department of Justice. Sen. Kennedy:When do you think you'll have it done, Kash? Kash Patel:Uh, I think in the, uh, in the near future, sir. Sen. Kennedy:Like before I die? Kash Patel:Senator, we are, um, we are—we've—we've been working on that and, um, we're doing it in a way that protects, um, victims and also doesn't, uh, put out into the ether, uh, information that is, um, irrelevant for, uh, production to the public such as CSAM. Sen. Kennedy:Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Senator Reid:Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Full screen video player with captions added here if you prefer: BREAKING: Kash Patel Says Jeffrey Epstein DID Kill Himself pic.twitter.com/PYQ6g3VvXu — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 8, 2025 Man, Kash doesn't even sound like himself anymore. Very concerning. Is he just doing the rope-a-dope? Just buying time while they wrap up their investigation and start the arrests? Doing his version of the Columbo routine? Or....is he compromised? What happened to turning the Hoover Building into a Museum? What happened to "On Day One!"? MEMO TO KASH PATEL: What Happened To “On Day One”? Hmmmm. To be fair, I searched and searched and could not find any old videos of Kash Patel saying "Jeffrey Epstein didn't kill himself" so there's no obvious link I can show you to him changing his tune. But it just doesn't feel right, not at all. Here is a sampling of how people are responding online: What are your thoughts? RELATED: PAM BONDI: Dr. Jekyll or Mrs. Hyde? Alex Jones Reveals Very Concerning Information PAM BONDI: Dr. Jekyll or Mrs. Hyde? Alex Jones Reveals Very Concerning Information Well, no sooner did I get finished publishing this report where I said I was extremely "cautiously optimistic": Pam Bondi Gives Epstiein Files Update: “No one victim will ever get released!” ....do I then see Alex Jones post this video where he claims that James O'Keefe is getting ready to expose Pam Bondi. For what? According to Jones, for stonewalling the Epstein Files investigation and release. Watch here: https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1920179042298269764 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Alex Jones James O'Keefe—one of the two big stories he's breaking is about someone in the Trump administration covering up Epstein. And then he put out a little short trailer yesterday that shows an image or still shot of video of Pam Bondi. So he didn't tell me the specifics when he called me—and me alone—as a dead man switch, which I was, I guess, flattered by. He's like, "I think you might be the only person that I know has the integrity to tell this in case something happens." And then when he told me, I was like, yeah, you are in. He told me the other stuff too, but he wouldn't even say who in the administration. So I made some phone calls and I told the crew over the weekend, I said, "It's Pam Bondi, according to my sources," because the White House already knows about this. So I wouldn't even tell the crew last week what the specifics were because I don't want to endanger them. And then there's two other big stories. And it looks like in this little promo video that he put out, he's kind of putting the three together, because it's a big Pfizer news, and then some more Epstein news connected to the Democrats. But I'm going to stop right there and wait and see what he puts out today. So we're going to be watching, obviously, his X account, Keith Meany, very, very closely now. Full screen video player with captions added here if you prefer: PAM BONDI: Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? Alex Jones Reveals Very Concerning Information pic.twitter.com/pGSS1TTIbM — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 7, 2025 Look folks, I know the MSM has done it's absolute best to vilify and discredit Alex Jones, but if you ask me Alex Jones has been right about almost everything I've ever seen. As far as I can tell, the old phrase "Don't piss in my face and tell me it's raining" applies directly to the MSM's portrayal of Alex Jones. They tell me over and over again how he's just a loony conspiracy theorist with kooky ideas that are not true, and yet....the more I watch what he says, the more it seems to me like he's one of the only guys actually telling us the truth! And he's right far more than he's wrong, as best I can tell. So coming from Alex, I take this pretty seriously. How about you? More here: Why does Pam Bondi look so nervous while Kash Patel is talking? She looks like she’s terrified what James O’keefe and OMG media are about to release… pic.twitter.com/3qcgC3DETo — FromConvict2Conservative (@YaakovRenewed) May 7, 2025 So who is Pam Bondi? White Hat? Black Hat? Is she doing a Columbo routine and fooling us all? Compromised? Incompetent? I really can't tell. I sure hope we find out soon. Here's my prior report: Pam Bondi Gives Epstiein Files Update: "No one victim will ever get released!" I continue to cover the Pam Bondi / Epstein Files case with extreme skepticism but also with hope that the corruption runs extremely deep and will take time to root out. So I guess you could say I'm extremely "cautiously optimistic". Here now is the latest... Pam Bondi was asked if certain Epstein Files are missing or destroyed and she laughed dismissively and said no. She then confirmed there are tens of thousands of videos and the FBI is going through each one. Take a look here: HOLEEE SHIZZLES BREAKING: Pam Bondi laughs when hearing James Comer suggested the Epstein Files are missing She states the FBI is actively reviewing tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with Children or child porn. I know it’s not a popular opinion, but I’m gonna give her… https://t.co/Tg7DZI60fR pic.twitter.com/HRX6EBDnxE — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) May 7, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Pam Bondi: No, no — the FBI, yeah, the FBI — they’re reviewing. There are tens of thousands of videos of Epstein with children, or child porn, and there are hundreds of victims. And no one victim will ever get released — it’s just the volume. And that’s what they’re going through right now. The FBI is diligently— I haven’t seen that statement, but I’ll call him later and find— Full screen video player here with captions if you prefer: Pam Bondi confirms the FBI has it all on Epstein, nothing missing -- Tens of Thousands of Victims! Give her time? pic.twitter.com/bmjkDcfI58 — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) May 7, 2025 One phrase kind of stuck out to me....what do you suppose she meant by:  "And no one victim will ever get released"? I asked AI what she likely meant and it told me this: The phrase "And no one victim will ever get released —" is unclear as stated, but based on the context, it’s likely Pam Bondi misspoke or her phrasing was garbled in an off-the-cuff remark. Here are two plausible interpretations: She meant "no video of any victim will ever be released":This makes the most sense contextually — she had just referenced tens of thousands of videos and the FBI reviewing them. So she may have intended to say that the videos depicting victims will never be released to the public due to their explicit and criminal nature. She misspoke when she said "victim" instead of "video":The sentence might have originally been meant as, "No one video will ever get released." This could have been jumbled due to rapid speech or emotion. In either case, the intent seems to be reassurance that none of the graphic or incriminating footage will be made public, likely to protect victim privacy and ensure legal integrity. Makes sense. But do you think she will eventually pull through? Do you still have hope? Or do you think this is just Bill Barr 2.0? I thought this was a very interesting observation.... Remember that soccer ball Putin gave to Trump? It seems as though it's now been passed from Trump to Bondi: Pam Bondi now has the Soccer Ball https://t.co/1u3D5eDnuY pic.twitter.com/pji42s4Dh2 — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) May 6, 2025 What do you all think?