Extreme Gaslighting: Here Are 7 Signs That The Mainstream Media Is Flat Out Lying To Us About The Economy

The power to harvest the energy of a whole star... and it might cost just a small planet!

The people need to know.

And all for eating a meal. A succulent raccoon meal.

The European Bronze Age wasn't exactly the most peaceful era.

Has anyone lived to tell the tale?

CNN News Central host John Berman interviewed GOP vice presidential nominee JD Vance on Friday and suggested to him that he was making fun of suicide as he previewed CNN’s interview with Kamala Harris by tweeting out an old clip of a Miss Teen USA beauty pageant. Most of the interview was devoted to Donald Trump’s abortion and IVF stances, but towards the end Berman recalled, “Last night after CNN released a small clip of the Harris interview, you, on Twitter, posted a clip from a Miss Teen USA beauty pageant from 2007, Caitlin Upton, and you wrote, ‘I have gotten a hold of the full Kamala Harris-CNN interview.’”   BREAKING: I have gotten ahold of the full Kamala Harris CNN interview. pic.twitter.com/c6nfcJrFJy — JD Vance (@JDVance) August 29, 2024   The clip showed Caitlin Upton struggling to give an explanation for why one-fifth of Americans can’t locate the U.S. on a map.     Berman added: Now, this thing that surfaced around the internet for a few years she had, you know, she had, you know, struggled answering a question back in this beauty pageant, I'm not sure you're aware in 2015, Caitlin Upton did an interview in New York Magazine about all the social media attention this clip got, and she said, ‘I definitely went through a period where I was very, very depressed, but I never let anybody see that stuff except for people I could trust. I had some very dark moments where I thought about committing suicide.’ He then asked, “So, when you posted this last night, were you aware that the woman you are posting a picture of had contemplated committing suicide for the attention that it received?” It should be noted current MSNBC host, Washington Post associate editor, and PBS talking head Jonathan Capehart has compared Republican women to Upton as well. As for Vance, he handled the no-win question well, “No, certainly not, John, and my heart goes out to her, and I hope that she's doing well. Look, I've said a lot of things on camera. I've said a lot of stupid things on camera. Sometimes, when you're in the public eye, you make mistakes. And again, I think the best way to deal with it is to laugh at ourselves, laugh at this stuff, and try to have some fun and politics.” He then turned the tables on Berman: I posted a meme from 20 years ago, and I think the fact that we're talking about that instead of the fact that American families can't afford groceries or health care, young families can't afford to buy a home to raise their families, those are the real crises that we should focus on, and there's nothing that says that we can't tell some jokes along the way while we to deal with a very serious business of bringing back our public policy. Politics has gotten way too lame, John, way too boring. You can have some fun while making a good argument to the American people about how you're going to improve their lives. For his part, Berman tried again, “Okay, I just want to be clear, though, you said you didn't know. Would you like to apologize to Caitlin Upton for posting that last night given what you've now learned?” Vance replied, “John, I'm not going to apologize for posting a joke, but I wish the best for Caitlin. I hope that she's doing well. And again, what I'd say is one bad moment shouldn't define anybody and the best way to deal with this stuff is to laugh at ourselves.” Reading the interview Upton did with New York Magazine makes it clear she had to put up with a lot of garbage for one embarrassing moment that, unfortunately, happened to occur in front of the whole world. However, it does appear that Upton agrees with Vance, as she was able to laugh through an Access Hollywood interview in 2021 about the incident. As for the left, several Twitter users criticized her for supporting Trump in light of Vance’s tweet. Here is a transcript for the August 30 show: CNN News Central 8/30/2024 8:42 AM ET JOHN BERMAN: Last night after CNN released a small clip of the Harris interview, you, on Twitter, posted a clip from a Miss Teen USA beauty pageant from 2007, Caitlin Upton and you wrote, “I have gotten a hold of the full Kamala Harris-CNN interview.”  Now, this thing that surfaced around the internet for a few years she had, you know, she had, you know, struggled answering a question back in this beauty pageant, I'm not sure you're aware in 2015, Caitlin Upton, did an interview in New York Magazine about all the social media attention this clip got, and she said, “I definitely went through a period where I was very, very depressed, but I never let anybody see that stuff except for people I could trust. I had some very dark moments where I thought about committing suicide.” So, when you posted this last night, were you aware that the woman you are posting a picture of had contemplated committing suicide for the attention that it received? JD VANCE: No, certainly not, John, and my heart goes out to her, and I hope that she's doing well. Look, I've said a lot of things on camera. I've said a lot of stupid things on camera. Sometimes, when you're in the public eye, you make mistakes. And again, I think the best way to deal with it is to laugh at ourselves, laugh at this stuff, and try to have some fun and politics.  I posted a meme from 20 years ago, and I think the fact that we're talking about that instead of the fact that American families can't afford groceries or health care, young families can't afford to buy a home to raise their families, those are the real crises that we should focus on, and there's nothing that says that we can't tell some jokes along the way while we to deal with a very serious business of bringing back our public policy.  Politics has gotten way too lame, John, way too boring. You can have some fun while making a good argument to the American people about how you're going to improve their lives. BERMAN: Okay, I just want to be clear, though, you said you didn't know. Would you like to apologize to Caitlin Upton for posting that last night given what you've now learned? VANCE: John, I'm not going to apologize for posting a joke, but I wish the best for Caitlin. I hope that she's doing well. And again, what I'd say is one bad moment shouldn't define anybody and the best way to deal with this stuff is to laugh at ourselves.

High-value dog treats are an indispensable tool to have on hand when you begin training your dog. The reason is simple: your dog will be much more motivated to perform the actions you’re asking them to if the reward they’re receiving in return is special and delicious. However, if you’re not sure what your dog considers to be “high value,” it can be challenging to motivate them to perform as expected. That’s why we’ve put together this list of the ten best high-value dog treats that nearly every dog will go wild for. Read on to find our reviews for these 10 treats, as well as a thorough buying guide to help you choose the perfect one for your pup. A Quick Comparison of Our Favorites in 2024 Rating Image Product Details Best Overall Stewart Beef Liver Freeze-Dried Raw Dog Treats Single-ingredient recipe Freeze-dried to preserve nutrients Chock full of protein and fatty acids CHECK PRICE Best Value Buddy Biscuits Trainers Training Bites Bacon Flavor Dog Treats Low calorie No corn or soy Made with natural pork liver CHECK PRICE Premium Choice Best Bully Sticks Beef Trachea Dog Treats Large package size Made with 100% beef trachea May promote dental and joint health CHECK PRICE Best for Puppies Zuke's Mini Naturals Peanut Butter & Oats Recipe Training Dog Treats Resealable bag Great for all life stages Made with real peanut butter CHECK PRICE pawTree Freeze Dried Duck & Mangoes High in protein Highly digestible Single-source protein formula CHECK PRICE The 10 Best High-Value Dog Treats 1. Stewart Beef Liver Freeze-Dried Raw Dog Treats – Best Overall Check Price on Chewy Check Price on Amazon Package size: 12 oz Calories per treat: 6 kcal Sourced from: United States If you’re looking for the most motivating and best overall high-value dog treat, you need to learn about the Stewart Beef Liver Freeze-Dried Raw Dog Treats. These single-ingredient treats are made from 100% pure beef liver and are therefore packed full of protein your dog needs to support their muscles. They also contain coat- and skin-supporting fatty acids and vitamin D. They are freeze-dried to preserve the nutrient integrity and ensure your pup gets the healthiest (and tastiest) reward for their hard work. Stewart manufactures these treats in America in small batches to ensure their freshness. They’re available in several flavor options, so if your dog isn’t wild about the beef liver flavor, you can try chicken liver, salmon, or chicken breast instead. The size of each treat can vary. Some consumers reported that their treats have been getting progressively smaller every time they order them, while others reported that they’re too big for their dogs. Pros Single-ingredient recipe Freeze-dried to preserve nutrients Made in small batches Available in other flavors Chock full of protein and fatty acids Cons Treat sizes can vary 2. Buddy Biscuits Trainers Training Bites Bacon Flavor Dog Treats – Best Value Check Price on Chewy Check Price on Amazon Package size: 10 oz Calories per treat: 1.5 kcal Sourced from: United States Those on a tight budget want to buy the best high-value dog treat for the money, and the Buddy Biscuits Trainers Training Bites Bacon Flavor Dog Treats provide just that. These low-calorie treats can be a guilt-free indulgence for your dog as they each contain just 1.5 calories. They’re made without corn, soy, or artificial flavorings and have a natural pork liver base that most dogs go wild for. The treats are pretty small and best suited for smaller breed dogs. Pros Low calorie No corn or soy Made with natural pork liver Highly palatable Cons Treats are very small 3. Best Bully Sticks Beef Trachea Dog Treats – Premium Choice Check Price on Chewy Check Price on Amazon Package size: 50 count Calories per treat: 50 kcal per 3 inches Sourced from: Brazil If you’re not working with a strict budget and don’t mind spending a little extra to help ensure the success of your pup’s training, the Best Bully Sticks Beef Trachea Dog Treats are a great pick. The beef trachea comes in a pack of 50 and is made with 100% free-range, grass-fed cattle. They do not contain any additives or preservatives. The trachea has a naturally grooved texture that may promote dental health by scraping away plaque and tartar. These sticks are a natural source of chondroitin and glucosamine, natural compounds that can support joint function. The treats may be too large for smaller dogs to eat comfortably. Pros Large package size Made with 100% beef trachea May promote dental and joint health Cons Not recommended for smaller dogs 4. Zuke’s Mini Naturals Peanut Butter & Oats Recipe Training Dog Treats – Best for Puppies Check Price on Chewy Check Price on Amazon Package size: 6 oz Calories per treat: 2 kcal Sourced from: N/A Growing puppies need a high-value treat that not only tastes good to get them interested in training but a treat that will promote health, too. Zuke’s Mini Naturals Peanut Butter & Oats Recipe Training Dog Treats are fortified with vitamins and minerals like vitamin E and zinc. These low-calorie treats feature real peanut butter as their first ingredient and are super soft and easy for your puppy to tear into. Your pup may want to keep using these for training sessions well into adulthood, too! There appears to be some consistency issues with the packaging. Some bags have a poor seal, so when they arrived on the consumer’s doorstep, they were dried out and stale. The packaging is resealable, however, so once you open them, they can be resealed to maintain their freshness. Pros Low-calorie treat Soft texture Made with real peanut butter Great for all life stages Resealable bag Cons Poor quality packaging at times 5. pawTree Freeze Dried Duck & Mangoes Check Latest Price Package size: 71 grams Calories per treat: 7 kcal Sourced from: N/A The pawTree Freeze Dried Duck & Mangoes treats are a limited-ingredient option that’s as highly digestible as they are tasty. Their digestibility makes them excellent treats for dogs with sensitive stomachs. They’re high in protein thanks to their single-source protein formula. Since they’re freeze-dried to preserve nutrient integrity and don’t have any fillers or artificial additives, pawTree’s treats are a guilt-free option for health-conscious dog owners. These treats may be hard to find in stores or online and are higher priced than some of the other options on our list. Pros Single-source protein formula Great for dogs with sensitive stomachs Highly digestible High in protein Cons Can be hard to find Expensive 6. Vital Essentials Chicken Hearts Freeze-Dried Raw Dog Treats Check Price on Chewy Check Price on Amazon Package size: 1.9 oz Calories per treat: 107 kcal per oz Sourced from: United States Vital Essentials Chicken Hearts Freeze-Dried Raw Dog Treats are a single-ingredient option, offering a preservative-free treat for your hardworking pup. The treats are frozen at peak freshness, so you always have a tasty, fresh treat on hand for your pup’s training sessions. They’re naturally abrasive in texture, which may promote teeth and gum health. The treats are low in calories and high in protein. Because they’re made with chicken hearts, they offer a good source of micronutrients like zinc, iron, and B vitamins. The treats may be too crunchy for some dogs, and since they’re pretty small, they may not be suitable for larger breeds. Pros High in protein Single-ingredient formulation Frozen at peak freshness Low in calories Good source of micronutrients Cons May be too crunchy Too small for larger breeds 7. Dr. Marty Tilly’s Treasures Beef Liver Dog Treat Check Latest Price Package size: 4 oz Calories per treat: 186 kcal per cup Sourced from: N/A Dr.Marty Tilly’s Treasures Beef Liver Dog Treat is a freeze-dried raw beef liver treat great for owners looking for high-quality nutrition wrapped up in a tasty package. These bites contain just one ingredient and are chock full of nutrients like protein, iron, and vitamins A and B. There is no per-treat calorie count available. Owners whose pups are on a diet may need to reach out to the company directly to find out how many calories are in each treat. Additionally, they are priced relatively high, which may make them inaccessible for some dog owners. Pros Single-ingredient treat High in protein Good source of vitamins A and B Cons Expensive No caloric information 8. Stella & Chewy’s Chicken Hearts Freeze-Dried Raw Dog Treats Check Price on Chewy Check Price on Amazon Package size: 3 oz Calories per treat: 119 kcal per oz Sourced from: Various Stella & Chewy’s Chicken Hearts Freeze-Dried Raw Dog Treats are another single-ingredient treat fantastic for pups with food sensitivities. These 100% freeze-dried raw chicken hearts offer your pup a hefty dose of zinc, iron, and B vitamins. They’re made without any artificial ingredients and are easily digestible. Though the source is not named, the company says their meats are all responsibly sourced and do not contain added hormones or antibiotics. The treats may be too big right out of the bag and may need to be chopped up before your training sessions. Some consumers reported the treats can be dusty and flaky. Pros Offers a good dose of zinc and iron No artificial ingredients Easily digestible Single-ingredient formulation Cons May need to be cut up Flaky and dusty Unclear where meat is sourced from 9. Pet Botanics Training Reward Bacon Flavor Dog Treats Check Price on Chewy Check Price on Amazon Package size: 567 g Calories per treat: 3 kcal Sourced from: N/A The Pet Botanics Training Reward Bacon Flavor Dog Treats are a low-calorie, high-value treat that’s perfectly sized for repetitive rewards. The packaging is easy to carry in your pocket, and the treats’ moist texture makes them easy to eat and chew. The treats are made from real pork liver and enhanced with vitamins and the manufacturer’s BotaniFits, a proprietary blend of botanicals like chamomile and rosemary. No artificial flavors or colors were added to this product. The ingredient list is quite long, which may be off-putting for some dog owners and pups with allergies. Additionally, they do contain added sugar to help maintain their texture. Pros Low calorie Made with real pork liver Small, easy-to-carry packaging Cons Long ingredient list Contains added sugar 10. Pupford Beef Liver Training Freeze-Dried Dog Treats Check Price on Chewy Check Price on Amazon Package size: 4 oz Calories per treat: 1 kcal Sourced from: United States The Pupford Beef Liver Training Freeze-Dried Dog Treats are freeze-dried and made in the USA. They contain beef liver and beef heart to offer a protein- and vitamin-rich treat that’s as healthy as it is tasty. They don’t contain any chemicals, colors, or fillers, and each treat contains one calorie or less, so you can feel good about giving them to your pup. These treats may be too hard and small for some dogs to eat. Additionally, they’re pretty expensive for the size of the bag. Pros Made with real beef liver and heart High in protein No chemicals or fillers Cons May be too hard and small for some breeds A little on the expensive Buyer’s Guide: Finding the Best High-Value Dog Treats What Are High-Value Treats? High-value dog treats are any food or treat that your dog loves but doesn’t get very often. They’re something your pup goes wild for and will do almost anything for. Essentially, high-value treats are extremely valuable because they’re special and occasional. It is imperative not to give them to your dog too often; otherwise, they’ll lose their value. Image Credit: EugeneEdge, Shutterstock Factors to Consider When Shopping for High-Value Dog Treats Flavor The flavor of your dog’s treats will be a huge deciding factor in which you choose. You know your dog and their preferences best, so choose a flavor they’ve already expressed interest in. If you don’t know which your pup prefers just yet, accept that you may need to do some trial and error to see which they prefer. Nutrients When we think about treats for ourselves, our minds typically first go to things like cookies and ice cream or otherwise delicious and calorically dense foods. However, our dogs don’t need these kinds of foods that are lacking in nutrients. That’s why the treats on our list aren’t chock full of unnecessary fillers or preservatives and instead focus primarily on optimizing your pup’s tradition. That said, some of the treats on our list are more nutrient-dense options than others, particularly those that are made with just one ingredient. But don’t let “nutrient-dense” trick you into thinking these treats are less tasty and won’t be as rewarding for your pup. Smell A dog’s sense of smell is incredibly strong. As a result, you may find your pup more interested in treats with an odorous, meaty scent. The stronger smelling your treats are, the more motivated your dog will be to perform as you want them to. Please note that you may find that the treats smell incredibly offensive, but remember, these are for your dog and not you. Texture Some of the training treats on our list are hard, while others are soft and moist. The texture you choose will depend on what type your pup prefers. The treat’s texture can also determine how easy it is to deliver them. Some of the options above are nice and moist, which makes breaking them in two super easy to do while you’re on the go. Others are hard and may require cutting beforehand if you need to break them down for your smaller dog to eat safely. Size Not all training treats are the same size or consistency, so consider your pup’s breed before deciding which treats to try. In our reviews, we mentioned that some may be too small for larger breeds or too big for smaller breeds, so keep that in mind before you buy. Image Credit: Aleksey Boyko, Shutterstock When to Use a High-Value Treat High-value treats should be reserved to reward good behavior and reinforce your training sessions. Some examples of perfect times to offer high-value treats include: When your dog is in a highly distracting environment (e.g. when training recall outdoors) When teaching them a new command During exposure training for puppies When introducing new behaviors When responding to a cue quickly What Are Other High-Value Treat Options? If you don’t want to buy dog treats to use as high-value rewards, there are plenty of other foods you can offer your pup to reinforce the behaviors you’re seeking. In many cases, dogs are highly motivated by human food. Some of the most popular high-value human foods include: Cheese Plain, roasted chicken Scrambled eggs Beef jerky (unsalted and unseasoned) Peanut butter Salmon jerky (unsalted and unseasoned) Apples Carrots Conclusion For the best overall high-value dog treat, Stewart’s Beef Liver Freeze-Dried Treats are great for their freshness, nutritional integrity, and single-ingredient recipe. Folks looking for a budget-friendly option should consider Buddy Biscuits Trainers Training Bites for their affordability and low-calorie count. We hope our reviews have helped you find the best training treat for your pup. Remember, to amplify your training success, reserve these treats for outstanding behavior only. Offering them too often will lessen their “sparkle.” Featured Image Credit: Lepale, Pixabay The post 10 Best High-Value Dog Treats in 2024 – Reviews & Top Picks appeared first on PangoVet.

The University at Buffalo retracted a statement on the homepage of its media studies website that accused political commentator Michael Knowles of threatening the "eradication and genocide" of transgender people.In what Knowles described as a "permanent denouncement of me for saying men and women are different," the Department of Media Study issued the following statement on its homepage:"The faculty of the Media Study department stand in solidarity with the transgender community and others who have been the target of Michael Knowles’ rhetoric and threats of eradication and genocide," the website stated. "While we are committed to the free and open exchange of ideas, we are also committed to inclusiveness, social justice and respect for all.""There is no space for hate speech as there can be no open exchange of ideas without inclusion, justice, and respect. We view Knowles’ public appearance on our campus as contrary to the values and aims of our academic community," it concluded.Knowles told Blaze News he was "as surprised as anyone" to find out that he was featured on the department website."I am denounced, repeatedly, for apparently having called for genocide," Knowles stated, still confused by the claim. He then tried to make sense of why the university made the statement:"I've only visited the University at Buffalo on one occasion. ... I was invited to give a speech. The speech was on feminism, [but] then I was denounced for observing that transgenderism isn't real ... in a different speech, that I gave more than two years ago, at a different event in Washington, D.C.," the commentator recalled. Your browser does not support the video tag. The university was likely referring to false headlines that incorrectly quoted Knowles as saying he wanted to eradicate transgender people.The claim came from a speech Knowles gave at CPAC in 2023 when he spoke about radical ideologies permeating through society. His actual quote said that "for the good of the poor people" who have become confused about their gender, "transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely."Knowles subsequently called out publications, including the Rolling Stone, for potential libel after they ran headlines that claimed he called for "transgender people to be 'eradicated.'"'One cannot simply go about accusing other people of calling for genocide.'Knowles was surprised to learn that after less than 48 hours, the Media Study Department at the University at Buffalo removed the potentially defamatory statement."I suspect the reason they took it down is not because they like me all of a sudden or they realize a man can't really become a woman. I suspect the reason they took it down is the same reason Rolling Stone changed its defamatory headline about me. ... They were legally liable for libel," Knowles laughed.The Daily Wire host, while generally dejected about the state of justice in the United States, noted that while American law sets a high threshold for libelous statements, there is still a line that can't be crossed."Even in our corrupted political system, one cannot simply go about accusing other people of calling for genocide," Knowles stated.The 34-year-old concluded by saying that gender ideology is being peddled at the highest levels for political gain, despite the obvious falsehood that a man can be a woman and a woman can become a man. Your browser does not support the video tag. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Vermont Department of Health issued a caution this week not to use the words "son" and "daughter," insinuating that a failure to do so may cultivate unhealthy learning environments. In a Facebook post shared to its official page Wednesday, the department (VDH) — run by Mark Levine, who was appointed commissioner by Republican Gov. Phil Scott — stated, "Many families and students are getting ready for the new school year. Equity in the classroom is an essential piece of a productive and healthy learning environment." "When talking about family, it's important to use terms that cover the many versions of what family can look like," said the post. Accompanying the post was an image titled, "Inclusive Language for Families," which contained instructions on how Vermonters should adjust their vocabularies and mindsets. According to the VDH, which states elsewhere that "gender is socially constructed," Vermonters should "[u]se 'child or 'kid' instead of 'daughter' or 'son'" because these substitutes are "gender-neutral and can describe a child who may not be someone's legal son or daughter." In addition to abandoning the centuries-old terms linked, respectively, to the Old English sunu for "male child in relation to either or both parents" and the Old English dohtor for "female child considered with reference to her parents," the VDH urged the sons and daughters of the Green Mountain State to say "family members" rather than "household members" because "not all families live in the same home — think divorced or incarcerated parents, stepsiblings, etc." 'Challenging our instinct or bias to prioritize the needs of white, straight, cisgender, and non-disabled and neurotypical students is the first step.' Blaze News reached out to the VDH inquiring about what prompted the posting as well as whether there was any scientific basis to its insinuation that the use of the terms "son" and "daughter" was harmful. The department did not provide a response by deadline. The VDH post seeking further severance of language from biological and conventional meaning was subject to immediate backlash, prompting the department to follow up on Facebook with a message claiming, "This post was intended to encourage using inclusive language when you don't know someone's family situation. This is especially important in settings like classrooms, afterschool programs and sports teams." "Using language that includes everyone helps children feel seen, respected, and valued no matter how their families are structured," wrote the department, adding a link to a department page about "health equity." According the department, health equity: exists when all people have a fair and just opportunity to be healthy, especially those who have experienced socioeconomic disadvantage, historical injustice, and other avoidable systemic inequalities that are often associated with social categories of race, gender, ethnicity, social position, sexual orientation and disability. The VDH's health equity page indicates why an organization that might otherwise assign greater focus to the local fallout of the opioid epidemic or alarmingly high STD rates is now pestering Vermonters about how they describe their children. In the interest of "culturally and linguistically appropriate care," the VDH has integrated the National Standards for Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services in Health and Healthcare (CLAS Standards) in all of its work. The National CLAS Standards were developed by the U.S. Department of Health and Health and Human Services' Office of Minority Health in 2000. The standards call for public organizations to "establish culturally and linguistically appropriate goals, policies, and management accountability, and infuse them throughout the organization’s planning and operations" as well as to "[partner with the community to design, implement, and evaluate policies, practices, and services to ensure cultural and linguistic appropriateness." Adherents to the standards are expected to learn about various cultural identities, combat bias, respect others' values and communication preferences, and adapt their services to various persons' cultural needs. The Christian Post noted that in its latest "Health Equity Update," the VDH provides additional tips on how Vermonters help with their leftist social engineering. The newsletter states, "Supporting the needs, backgrounds, and abilities of all students is a complex task. Challenging our instinct or bias to prioritize the needs of white, straight, cisgender, and non-disabled and neurotypical students is the first step. This will reduce barriers for BIPOC and LGBTQIA+ students as well as those with physical and neurological disabilities." In addition to de-prioritizing the needs of students hailing from that racial demographic, which makes up around 91% of the state's population, the health organization echoes CLAS literature, stressing that teachers, coaches, "afterschool school providers," and mentors should reflect on their own beliefs and "become more conscious of issues related to racial equity and gender equity." The VDH is hardly the first institution to urge Americans to drop words leftists believe are offensive or antiquated. Stanford University, for instance, released an index of "harmful words" in 2022 that it indicated would be eliminated from use and its websites. These words included: "addict," "American," "ballsy," "Brave," "chief," "gentlemen," "he," "straight," "master," and "white paper." The New Hampshire Journal highlighted how earlier this year, New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu's (R) Department of Information Technology shared a memo claiming the words "citizen," "guys," "he or she," "man-made," "handicapped," "normal," and "elderly," were problematic, exclusionary, and/or harmful. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!