YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #nightsky #biology #moon #plantbiology #gardening #autumn #supermoon #perigee #zenith #flower #rose #euphoria #spooky #supermoon2025
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Journalist Should Align with the Powerless not the Powerful
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Monumental Shift Puts Trump Ahead of Biden Just Hours Before the Debate
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Monumental Shift Puts Trump Ahead of Biden Just Hours Before the Debate

Former President Donald Trump has the political wind at his back, based on new polling published just ahead of Thursday night's presidential debate. A Quinnipiac University survey released Wednesday found the Republican with a 4-percentage-point advantage over Democrat President Joe Biden, who led in a May poll released by the...
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Brilliant Reversal of 2020 Debates Leaves Biden in a Tough Spot
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Brilliant Reversal of 2020 Debates Leaves Biden in a Tough Spot

The tables are turning on President Joe Biden and the rest of the Democrats on Thursday night. During the CNN-hosted presidential debate between former President Donald Trump and Biden, it looks like the forces of so-called "fact-checking" will finally be levied in the right's favor for a change. According to...
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
1 y

Five States Reportedly Suing Pfizer Over COVID-19 Jab
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Five States Reportedly Suing Pfizer Over COVID-19 Jab

Five U.S. states are reportedly suing Pfizer, alleging the pharmaceutical company made ‘misleading claims’ about the safety of its experimental COVID-19 shot. “Five states — Texas, Utah, Kansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana — suing Pfizer for knowing and concealing the vaccine causing myocarditis, pericarditis, failed pregnancies and deaths. That’s 10% of US states. The tide is turning,” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said. Five states — Texas, Utah, Kansas, Mississippi, and Louisiana — suing Pfizer for knowing and concealing the vaccine causing myocarditis, pericarditis, failed pregnancies and deaths. That’s 10% of US states. The tide is turning. — Robert F. Kennedy Jr (@RobertKennedyJr) June 25, 2024 Earlier this month, Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, a Republican, announced a lawsuit against the COVID-19 jab manufacturer. Republican Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against Pfizer "As I mentioned before, it is part of a multi-state effort in which more suits may follow depending on Pfizer's reaction," Kobach said during a press conference. Five U.S. states are suing Pfizer over false claims regarding the safety and efficacy of its Covid vaccine. Prof Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson say its appalling that we must resort to the courts to protect ourselves. https://t.co/pMfVBXyLAz — The Daily Sceptic (@LD_Sceptics) June 23, 2024 “Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women. However, in February of 2021, Pfizer possessed reports for 458 pregnant women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy. More than half of the pregnant women reported an adverse event and more than 10% reported a miscarriage, many within days of the vaccination,” Kobach said. “Pfizer consistently denied any evidence of connection or safety signal between its COVID-19 vaccine and myocarditis or pericarditis,” he continued. “Pfizer also claimed that its COVID-19 vaccine protected against COVID-19 variants, even though data available at the time showed Pfizer’s vaccine was effective less than half the time against variants,” he added. WATCH: The Daily Sceptic reports: First, none of what the Kansas Attorney General (AG) Kris Kobach said was unknown in December 2020 or was not easily foreseen. No trials had been conducted in pregnant women, and pregnancy was an exclusion criterion for participating in the pivotal trial. Pfizer’s own pharmacokinetics (PK) study indicated a high concentration of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) in rats’ ovaries. All regulators were aware of this, as the thin PK studies were part of the regulatory submission. Given this widespread scatter of the LNPs and given their property of evading immunity, each system in the human body was a potential target and, therefore, open to potential harm by a scantily tested technology (we are being generous here). The protective effect of Comirnaty is untested today. The clinical study report of the pivotal trial does not provide evidence that it can affect viral load and create viral “dead ends”, as Dr Fauci falsely stated. Subsequent observational studies carried out by, for example, the CDC may show such an effect on mortality. However, this could be due to the inherent bias of observational studies and natural Farr-like decreases in the epidemic curve. With observational studies, you do not get certainty, only multiple alternative hypotheses. Last but not least, regulators were quite clear that no interruption of transmission studies had been carried out. None. "Pfizer misled the public that it had a 'safe and effective' COVID-19 vaccine," the complaint filed by Kobach read. "Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public," it stated. "Pfizer’s misrepresentations of a 'safe and effective' vaccine resulted in record company revenue of approximately $75 billion from COVID-19 vaccine sales in just two years," it added. "Pfizer must be held accountable for falsely representing the benefits of its COVID-19 vaccine while concealing and suppressing the truth about its vaccine’s safety risks, waning effectiveness, and inability to prevent transmission," it noted. From Kanekoa The Great: Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan has extracted the main points from Kansas Attorney General's lawsuit against Pfizer, and they're d***ing. 1. Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements with the U.S. Government and others to conceal, suppress, and omit material facts relating to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, including the safety and efficacy of the vaccine. 2. Pfizer used an extended study timeline to conceal critical data – the study was repeatedly delayed, including a delay from January 2023 to February 2024 because of a late vaccination of a single study participant (out of 44,000 participants). 3. The FDA did not immediately make the safety and effectiveness data for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine available, claiming it would take 55 years, but a federal judge forced them to release 55,000 pages per month rather than 500. 4. Pfizer destroyed the vaccine control group once the FDA approved emergency use authorization in December 2020. 5. In its press release announcing the emergency use authorization, Pfizer did not disclose that it had excluded immunocompromised individuals from its COVID-19 vaccine trials. 6. Pfizer knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis. 7. By March 2021, the United States military and Israel's Ministry of Health detected a safety signal for myocarditis. 8. In August 2021, after Pfizer obtained FDA approval through emergency use authorization to provide its COVID-19 vaccine to 12-15-year-olds, Pfizer decided to study “how often” its vaccine may cause myocarditis or pericarditis in children by testing 5-16-year-olds for troponin I. 9. Pfizer also detected a safety signal relating to strokes. The FDA's and CDC's “surveillance system flagged a possible link between the new Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent COVID-19 vaccine and strokes in people aged 65 and over," and an FDA study found that individuals 85 years or older who received both a flu vaccine and Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine “saw a 20% increase in the risk of ischemic stroke.” 10. Pfizer’s knowledge of a safety signal for increased fatalities. In February 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. 11. Pfizer only tested the booster shot on 12 trial participants who were in the 65- to 85-year-old age range and did not test it on any participant older than 85. 12. Pfizer did not publicly release adverse event data from its database. By February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events from 42,086 case reports, including 1,223 fatalities, although Pfizer did not make causality findings. Pfizer was receiving so many adverse events reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff and expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021. Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “nonserious cases.” Pfizer did not know “the magnitude of under-reporting. 13. Pfizer announced a study on pregnant women but omitted the fact that more than one in ten women (52) who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported a miscarriage, many within days of vaccination. Six women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine during their pregnancy reported premature deliveries; several babies died. 14. Pfizer’s February 18th, 2021, press release also did not disclose other adverse effects on the reproductive systems of women who received Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. By April 2022, Pfizer knew of tens of thousands of adverse advents connected to its COVID-19 vaccine, including heavy menstrual bleeding (27,685), menstrual disorders (22,145), irregular periods (15,083), delayed periods (13,989), absence of periods (11,363) and other reproductive system effects. 15. Pfizer’s study on pregnant women failed. They destroyed the placebo control group, and the results were kept secret. 16. Pfizer misrepresented and concealed material facts relating to the durability of protection provided by its COVID-19 vaccine. 17. Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission even though it knew it had never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission. 18. Despite admissions by Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla and Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb that Pfizer did not know if its vaccine prevented transmission, Dr. Bourla warned Kansans on multiple occasions that not receiving a COVID-19 vaccine would affect the lives of those around them, thus implying that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine prevented transmission. 19. Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims. On July 19th 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb claimed social media companies had an “obligation” and an “affirmative responsibility” to prevent the spread of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on their platforms. Pfizer Chairman and CEO Dr. Bourla called people who spread misinformation on COVID-19 vaccines “criminals” who have “literally cost millions of lives.” 20. Pfizer worked to conceal and suppress material facts. On August 24th, 2021, Pfizer Board Member Dr. Scott Gottlieb contacted Twitter to complain about a column written by Alex Berenson that criticized Dr. Anthony Fauci. On August 27th, 2021, Dr. Scott Gottlieb had a conference call with Twitter employees to discuss Mr. Berenson. Twitter banned Mr. Berenson the next day. Dr. Gottlieb also contacted Twitter about removing posts related to natural immunity, which "Twitter later slapped with a misleading label and blocked the ability to like or share the tweet." Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan has extracted the main points from Kansas Attorney General's lawsuit against Pfizer, and they're damning. 1. Pfizer used its confidentiality agreements with the U.S. Government and others to conceal, suppress, and omit material facts relating to… pic.twitter.com/PY6RePD354 — KanekoaTheGreat (@KanekoaTheGreat) June 27, 2024 Read the full 179-page complaint HERE.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
1 y

Michelle Obama Is REFUSING To Campiagn For Biden, Here’s Why
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Michelle Obama Is REFUSING To Campiagn For Biden, Here’s Why

A new report revealed that former First Lady Michelle Obama had not been campaigning for Biden due to personal frustrations with the Biden family. Fox News reported that Michelle Obama expressed “private frustrations” with the Bidens due to their treatment of her friend Kathleen Bible, who previously divorced Hunter Biden. Buhle and Michelle Obama became friends while her husband was president and Joe Biden was vice president. Hunter Biden and Kathleen Buhle divorced in 2017, and Buhle has since been exiled from the Biden family, which has angered Michelle. Michelle Obama has also distanced herself from Biden after Hunter Biden started dating his late brother Beau’s wife. Michelle reportedly described the relationship as “weird sh*t.” Michelle Obama not campaigning for Biden over exile of Hunter’s ex-wife Kathleen Buhle: report https://t.co/DOYVZ3vY9p pic.twitter.com/Z0BTzfw8of — New York Post (@nypost) June 27, 2024 Check out what Fox News reported: Michelle Obama has expressed private frustration with the Bidens over the treatment of her friend Kathleen Buhle after her divorce from Hunter Biden. It has made her reluctant to openly campaign for the president, according to a new report. The former first lady became friends with Buhle while her husband was in office and Joe Biden was his vice president, and they have since remained close. Hunter Biden and Buhle separated in 2015 and divorced in 2017. Buhle wrote in her memoir “If We Break” about his addictions and infidelity fracturing their marriage, and she was “largely exiled” from the family after their split, according to the Axios report. According to the report, the Biden family was irked by Buhle’s book, although it came out a year after Hunter Biden’s 2021 memoir “Beautiful Things,” which delved into his addiction issues. Axios also reported in 2017 that former President Obama attended a Wilmington, Delaware, fundraiser for the Beau Biden Foundation, a children’s advocacy group. At the time, the recently divorced Hunter Biden was dating his late brother’s widow, Hallie Biden. According to a source who spoke to Axios, Obama described the dynamics on display as “weird s–t,” although he has since denied making such a statement. Michelle Obama privately told others she felt Buhle had been wronged in the aftermath of the marriage’s collapse, and she has not been out front on the campaign trail for President Biden as he faces his re-election battle against former President Trump. She does active work with a voter registration group, however. EXCLUSIVE: Michelle Obama has privately expressed frustration over how the Bidens largely exiled her close friend Kathleen Buhle after her messy divorce from Hunter Biden. That’s partly why she hasn’t campaigned for Biden’s re-election. https://t.co/WM0CBn8JR9 — Axios (@axios) June 27, 2024 Per The New York Post: Former first lady Michelle Obama is reluctant to publicly campaign for President Biden’s re-election because, in part, of how the family treated Kathleen Buhle, her close friend, in the wake of her divorce from Hunter Biden, a new report claims. The wife of former President Barack Obama has largely steered clear of the 2024 campaign trail after expressing frustration in private over Buhle’s apparent exile from the Biden family years earlier, Axios reported, citing two sources familiar with the relationship. Michelle’s disdain for partisan politics is also partly to blame for her absence so far this election cycle, the sources added. So….do you think that’s the true reason? Or do you think it might have something more to do with this? Is Michelle Obama Angling to Replace Biden For 2024? "Big Mike" waiting in the wings? Is Michelle Obama Angling to Replace Biden For 2024? Is Joe Biden really going to be the Democrat presidential nominee for this year's election? Or, do Democrats have something up their sleeves? Planning to sneak someone else in as Biden's last-minute replacement? According to legendary New York Post columnist Cindy Adams, that's exactly what Dems are planning. And, they have someone specific in mind to replace Biden with... "Plans are to grab Michelle for the Democratic presidency choice. Making the music is Barack the orchestra leader," Adams warned, "The Obamas are now nudging to force SloMo Joe to go. Drop out. It’s like who else is there?" The World is once again moving to Most Dangerous Era of Wars & Genocide! Michelle Obama can "sneak her way" into 2024 Presidential Race. Huge pressure being built on Joe Biden to opt out of re-run. So far he is resisting the pressure, but can't say for how long. pic.twitter.com/g31dO0Nzft — BhikuMhatre (@MumbaichaDon) January 19, 2024 Cindy Adams, the storied gossip columnist for the New York Post, says that Barack and Michelle Obama are plotting to replace Joe Biden with Michelle to be the 2024 Presidential nominee. Barack Obama is in many peoples view the acting president behind the scenes in the Biden… — Jericho (@JerichoXVI) January 19, 2024 Earlier this month, Michelle Obama made headlines with a media appearance in which she admitted she was "terrified about what could happen" in the next election, "Because our leaders matter. Who we select. Who speaks for us. Who holds that bully pulpit." Here's a clip from that podcast interview: Michelle Obama says she is kept awake at night due to the upcoming election: "I am terrified about what could happen" pic.twitter.com/3kOCmJe9jB — End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) January 8, 2024 So, is Michelle angling to sneak her way in to the presidential nominee position? Read this New York Post opinion piece excerpt and decide for yourself: Biden won’t debate. Can’t. Our codger-in-chief can’t even read the prewritten script in front of him fast enough to pronounce the words. So, forget him — which most of us already have. Coming back now — Obama. Not him. HER! We’ve heard this drumbeat for a while. Now it’s louder. Plans are to grab Michelle for the Democratic presidency choice. Making the music is Barack the orchestra leader. Michelle says she’s “terrified” Trump will win. No casual burp. Was programmed. She’s sent a survey to Dem biggies asking their feelings about her candidacy. Obama’s quietly angling for Joe to go. He’s weaseled up to this for a few weeks. Mouths aren’t talking. But mouths are knowing. Over one year ago, summer of 2022, she was in NYC meeting several big hedge CEOs, and said, “I am running, and I am asking for your support.” The Obamas are now nudging to force SloMo Joe to go. Drop out. It’s like who else is there? Columnist Cindy Adams isn't the only one who thinks this. Ted Cruz has also stated that he believes Michelle Obama will replace Joe Biden. Ted Cruz: Democrats Will ‘Parachute’ Michelle Obama in to Replace Joe Biden.https://t.co/Hxxho6uUix — Ted Cruz (@tedcruz) September 22, 2023 Breitbart reported on Cruz's opinion: …According to Cruz, if by the time of the Democratic National Convention in August Biden’s “mental diminishment” worsens, it becomes “obvious to anyone that he can’t find his shoes,” and Democrats begin worrying, the event will serve as an opportunity to “parachute” a replacement in. “The Democrat kingmakers [will then] jettison Joe Biden and parachute in Michelle Obama,” he suggested, adding that “you don’t infuriate African American women, which is a critical part of the constituency that Democrats are relying on to win.” He also suggested that Michelle Obama, having once served as first lady, “has the ability to kind of parachute in above all four [top Democrat contenders] and say, ‘Hey, we’re not picking among any of you; you guys can all fight it out next time.’” “This is the Obamas saving the day,” he stated. Cruz also expressed his belief that Barack Obama is “already running the Biden administration,” serving as a “puppet master” behind the Biden White House. So, what do you think? Is Michelle Obama angling to be Joe Biden's replacement? Let us know your thoughts... Oh, and have you seen this? Thoughts? New Poll Says Michelle Obama "Most Admired Woman". Do You Agree? YES or NO
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
1 y

URGENT WARNING: President Trump’s Life In Danger At Tonight’s “Rigged” Debate?
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

URGENT WARNING: President Trump’s Life In Danger At Tonight’s “Rigged” Debate?

Heads up folks, this is an URGENT SOS! I want to make extremely clear upfront I am publishing this article to warn against this and get as many of you praying against this as possible!!!  We love President Trump and we do not want one hair on his head harmed! Please share this far and wide and let’s hope people inside President Trump’s team see this and even someone within his Secret Service protection detail. I hope this is all much ado about nothing, but I am so worried for his safety. I know so many of you are praying for him daily and so are we! Please keep those prayers going and increase them right now! Because I just saw this and I have to say it makes a lot of sense….. We already know tonight’s Debate is going to be RIGGED against President Trump, but could it even be worse than that? Think about it…. We have a closed off room with no access, not even for Reporters. Controlled only by CNN. Will the Secret Service even be allowed in? Watch this short clip from my friend Chris Greene over at AMTV Media where I think he explains it beautifully: BREAKING: @AMTVmedia questions whether tonight’s debate will be a “John Wilkes Booth” moment. A controlled environment? A sitting duck? WE PRAY FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP’S SAFETY!!! pic.twitter.com/zm0KkkBmkJ — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 27, 2024 Full video player here: BREAKING: @AMTVmedia questions whether tonight’s debate will be a “John Wilkes Booth” moment. A controlled environment? A sitting duck? WE PRAY FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP’S SAFETY!!! pic.twitter.com/zm0KkkBmkJ — DailyNoah.com (@DailyNoahNews) June 27, 2024 He usually deletes his videos after a few days, so you can watch the full video here — at least until he deletes it: Now I want to address anyone reading this who says “Noah has really lost it now!” To that I say….really? Ok, but I guess you just haven’t seen this yet — because even the Far-Left White House Press Corps seems to agree with me: BREAKING: White House Press Corps Petitioning CNN For Access To Debate Studio Due To “Medical Emergency”! BREAKING: White House Press Corps Petitioning CNN For Access To Debate Studio Due To "Medical Emergency"! Folks, this is an absolute bombshell.... It seems like no one is happy with CNN's handling of this debate. From the Mute Button on President Trump.... To the 2 minute live delay.... To an emergency Lawsuit that was filed against CNN just this morning: BREAKING: Lawsuit Filed Against CNN On Eve Of The Debate It seems like EVERYONE is in agreement on one thing: CNN's handling of this debate is a disaster for Free Speech, for open debate and for our Constitution and ideals that have governed this great nation for centuries! And when I say everyone I mean everyone -- even the White House Press Corps which is largely comprised of Far-Left "Fake News". When even the Far-Left Fake News is against what you are doing, you know you have possibly gone too far.  WAY too far. But it's the reason they're giving that is turning lots of heads.... Get this: the White House Press Corps has petitioned CNN to open up the debate studio to reporters (why wasn't this allowed in the first place?  VERY strange!) because, and I quote, they believe there may be a "medical emergency" involving one of the Presidential Candidates! HOLY CRAP! Take a look: BREAKING: White House press corps has petitioned CNN to open up the debate studio to reporters, who for now have to watch a feed from a building across the street, b/c they believe there may be a "medical emergency" involving one of the prez candidates requiring on-scene coverage — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) June 27, 2024 Now the most natural thought of course would be Joe Biden.... Does he have a heart attack from too many amphetamines? Could he literally die on stage? Or....going even darker and thinking about President Trump.....we have a closed off room with no access not even for reporters....God forbid could we have a Abraham Lincoln or John F. Kennedy moment? Folks, now I'm worried. And remember this.... They (whoever "They is) always hide what they're going to do in plain sight! And they always tell you ahead of time what they're going to do. I don't know why, but I do know in some strange way it seems to be some sort of Law of the Universe that governs "their" behavior. So did they just tell us what's about to happen? And is that why this debate is so early this year? HISTORICALLY, and unprecedentedly, early.... Are we about to see a major campaign-shifting moment where one candidate is no longer in this race after tonight? Let's hope and pray for peace and safety.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
1 y

BREAKING: White House Press Corps Petitioning CNN For Access To Debate Studio Due To “Medical Emergency”!
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

BREAKING: White House Press Corps Petitioning CNN For Access To Debate Studio Due To “Medical Emergency”!

Folks, this is an absolute bombshell…. It seems like no one is happy with CNN’s handling of this debate. From the Mute Button on President Trump…. To the 2 minute live delay…. To an emergency Lawsuit that was filed against CNN just this morning: BREAKING: Lawsuit Filed Against CNN On Eve Of The Debate It seems like EVERYONE is in agreement on one thing: CNN's handling of this debate is a disaster for Free Speech, for open debate and for our Constitution and ideals that have governed this great nation for centuries! And when I say everyone I mean everyone -- even the White House Press Corps which is largely comprised of Far-Left "Fake News". When even the Far-Left Fake News is against what you are doing, you know you have possibly gone too far.  WAY too far. But it's the reason they're giving that is turning lots of heads.... Get this: the White House Press Corps has petitioned CNN to open up the debate studio to reporters (why wasn't this allowed in the first place?  VERY strange!) because, and I quote, they believe there may be a "medical emergency" involving one of the Presidential Candidates! HOLY CRAP! Take a look: BREAKING: White House press corps has petitioned CNN to open up the debate studio to reporters, who for now have to watch a feed from a building across the street, b/c they believe there may be a "medical emergency" involving one of the prez candidates requiring on-scene coverage — Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) June 27, 2024 Now the most natural thought of course would be Joe Biden.... Does he have a heart attack from too many amphetamines? Could he literally die on stage? Or....going even darker and thinking about President Trump.....we have a closed off room with no access not even for reporters....God forbid could we have a Abraham Lincoln or John F. Kennedy moment? Folks, now I'm worried. And remember this.... They (whoever "They is) always hide what they're going to do in plain sight! And they always tell you ahead of time what they're going to do. I don't know why, but I do know in some strange way it seems to be some sort of Law of the Universe that governs "their" behavior. So did they just tell us what's about to happen? And is that why this debate is so early this year? HISTORICALLY, and unprecedentedly, early.... Are we about to see a major campaign-shifting moment where one candidate is no longer in this race after tonight? Let's hope and pray for peace and safety.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
1 y

Supreme Court Delivers HUGE Blow to Biden
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

Supreme Court Delivers HUGE Blow to Biden

The Supreme Court has just issued a major ruling that curtails the Biden admin’s environmental goals. SCOTUS ruled against the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Good Neighbor” rule, which sought top unify 23 state’s differing approaches to air quality management into a single federal rule. Supreme Court halts Biden administration’s “good neighbor” plan to curb smog across states, again limiting government power to protect the environmenthttps://t.co/O14Dg49sUa — CNN Breaking News (@cnnbrk) June 27, 2024 Simon Ateba broke down SCOTUS’ ruling in this post: BREAKING – RULING AGAINST BIDEN’S EPA: The Supreme Court has just now blocked the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Good Neighbor Plan, which aimed to impose uniform emissions-reduction measures on 23 states to improve downwind air quality. NOTE: The Court found that the… pic.twitter.com/oQGCqtzWpQ — Simon Ateba (@simonateba) June 27, 2024 The New York Post explained: The Supreme Court temporarily blocked a Biden administration policy meant to reduce cross-state air pollution Thursday, preventing it from taking effect while lower court litigation played out. In a 5-4 decision, the justices handed a win to three Republican-led states — Indiana, Ohio and West Virginia — as well as US Steel, pipeline operator Kinder Morgan and other steel and fossil fuel industry groups that had contested the policy. The Environmental Protection Agency triggered the challenge in March 2023 when it proposed a rule that would have applied to power plants and other industrial sources of ozone in 23 upwind states whose own emission-reduction plans were found to run afoul of the so-called “Good Neighbor” provision of the federal Clean Air Act. The “Good Neighbor” rule is meant to assist downwind states such as New York, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin comply with federal air quality standards. Writing for the majority, Justice Neil Gorsuch found that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed in their claim that the proposed EPA rule was “arbitrary” and not “reasonably explained. Forbes has more details on what this ruling means: The Supreme Court temporarily blocked the Environmental Protection Agency’s “Good Neighbor” policy on Thursday while litigation moves forward, a ruling that could increase pollution by getting rid of restrictions on air pollution that could flow down to other states. The “Good Neighbor” plan requires states that are “upwind” to reduce pollution that flows into “downwind” states and keeps them from meeting federal air quality standards. After states submitted proposals to comply with the policy, the EPA said in 2023 that 23 states’ plans weren’t adequate, and imposed its own federal implementation plan (FIP) that those states must follow in order to comply with the policy. That FIP gives states a “budget” for their emissions, the government noted in a court brief, and the EPA estimated it would prevent approximately 1,300 premature deaths in 2026 alone and cut emissions from power plants by 50% by 2027, compared with 2021 levels. A number of those states challenged the FIP and the EPA’s rejections of their proposals to comply with the policy, while the agency put the implementation of the FIP on hold in other states, leading to a patchwork of policies across the country. Twelve states asked the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to block the FIP while the litigation played out, which the appeals court refused to do, leading the states to go to the Supreme Court and ask for relief. The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 to block the FIP while the litigation moves forward, meaning none of the states have to comply with the “Good Neighbor” policy until the litigation is resolved.  
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
1 y ·Youtube Funny Stuff

YouTube
Debate Night Hot Mic
Like
Comment
Share
One America News Network Feed
One America News Network Feed
1 y

Trump Campaign To Run Two New Ads During Debate
Favicon 
www.oann.com

Trump Campaign To Run Two New Ads During Debate

The Trump campaign has released a pair of scathing ads set to air during the debate.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 65954 out of 98148
  • 65950
  • 65951
  • 65952
  • 65953
  • 65954
  • 65955
  • 65956
  • 65957
  • 65958
  • 65959
  • 65960
  • 65961
  • 65962
  • 65963
  • 65964
  • 65965
  • 65966
  • 65967
  • 65968
  • 65969
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund