While every Sujimon is viable on the right team‚ the highest rarity Sujimon will make the best allies on your battle to the top of the Sujimon League in Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth. Obtaining high-rarity Sujimon takes a lot of time and money‚ but it’s worth the investment. The gacha system is at the core of the Sujimon minigame in Infinite Wealth‚ so naturally‚ obtaining the best Sujimon is a chance-based affair. You can maximize your chances with Master Tickets that let you pull from the Japan or Kiwami gacha banners‚ or you can continue to raise your team of Sujimon until you gain access to harder Sujimon Raids. Either way‚ getting better Sujimon means putting in more work. All Sujimon Rarity Levels in Like a Dragon Infinite Wealth There are five Sujimon rarity levels in Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth. Green Bronze Silver Gold Kiwami You can see a Sujimon’s rarity by examining the letter S on their icon. The color ...

You’ll get most of your Sujimon in Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth through the gacha system‚ but the best Sujimon can only be obtained with Master Tickets. Strong Sujimon are obtained with Japanese Master Tickets‚ but the best require a Kiwami Master Ticket to recruit. Thankfully‚ getting your hands on Master Tickets to pull on the best Sujimon banners is fairly straightforward as long as you put in the work and progress through the Sujimon League by defeating the members of the Discreet Four. Once you start hitting a difficulty roadblock‚ you’ll likely have a few Master Tickets in your possession to get better Sujimon. How to Get Japanese Master Tickets in Like a Dragon Infinite Wealth Japanese Master Tickets can be obtained by visiting a Suji Spot‚ or you can receive them as a reward for defeating certain Sujimon trainers. However‚ Japanese Master Tickets will not start to appear until you defeat the first member of the Discreet Four. ...

When you visit Dondoko Island in Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth‚ you’ll find yourself taking advantage of a whole new set of resources. Some resources are especially useful‚ so here is a guide telling you where to find the Pearl on Dondoko Island in Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth. Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth – where to find the Pearl on Dondoko Island There are 23 items in the Collectable section of your Dokopedia‚ including the Pearl. Knowing that doesn’t tell you where to find the item‚ however. To find the Pearl on Dondoko Island‚ check Gachapin Beach and the Lake. Screenshot: PC Invasion The Pearl is a more useful component than most. You need 10 Pearls to craft an outdoor furnishing such as the Fountain or Fukupi-chan‚ and even some structures such as the Traditional Japanese Building. Additionally‚ you can give a Pearl as a gift to Risa Unai‚ one of your prestigious guests. Related: Where to get the Empty Cough Drop Tin...

The Civil rights movement‚ the Vietnam War‚ Woodstock‚ John F. Kennedy’s assassination. These are only a few of the countless events that happened in the decade known as the 60s. It was a time of change and growth — for not just the United States‚ but the whole world. Take a look back to a time when some of the most important moments of the 20th century were occurring‚ even though not everyone... Source

There has never been this much support for Texas independence

A major feature of the House Ways and Means Committee’s “tax bill” is an expansion of the child tax credit. This expansion was necessary to secure Democrats’ support for the corporate tax provisions in the bill‚ but the trade isn’t worth the cost. The welfare-related child tax credit provisions aren’t a minor extension of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017‚ but a massive departure from the status quo. Together‚ they move the country in the wrong direction on welfare policy after years of pro-family‚ pro-work progress. The problems with the committee’s bill are many. It would increase welfare subsidies for single parents rather than further promoting and strengthening married‚ two-parent households. It would undermine rather than strengthen work requirements in welfare. It would increase‚ not reduce‚ fraud and excess benefits. It would provide more welfare to illegal immigrants. Fundamentally‚ this bill accepts the tenets of President Joe Biden’s welfare agenda and‚ if it is not stopped this time‚ will need to be fixed when the rest of the provisions of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expire in 2025.  Far from a program that incentivizes work and family formation‚ the Ways and Means Committee’s bill‚ by expanding so-called refundable child tax credits‚ would simply expand the traditionally flawed welfare state. The bill is based on the premise that more welfare money must be spent‚ primarily to subsidize single parents. Although the bill claims its aim is to provide “tax relief” to families with children‚ there is little “tax relief” in it for working families. Instead‚ over 90% of the “family benefits” would be new cash welfare payments to families who pay no federal income taxes and little or no Social Security tax. Nearly all family benefits in the bill are overt cash welfare payments‚ not “tax relief.”  If passed‚ the bill would greatly expand the Additional Child Tax Credit‚ which is a simple cash welfare benefit program that has nothing to do with taxes. The current ACTC program has a weak work requirement riddled with extensive fraud. The committee bill would deliberately weaken this already weak work requirement.  Under current law‚ parents ostensibly are required to work to obtain ACTC benefits; benefits increase as earnings increase. However‚ this work requirement is highly porous and readily evaded through fraud. In the current program‚ only 55% of benefits for single parents appear to go to eligible parents. Often‚ the custodial single parent will transfer eligibility for the benefit and the work requirement to relatives or other adults who don’t even live with the child.  The transferred benefit then is shared with the nonworking single parent. A work requirement that easily can be “transferred” to others is not a serious requirement. Regrettably‚ this bill takes an already porous‚ fraud-filled work requirement and would weaken it further by insisting that recipients need only work every other year instead of every year.   Another alarming aspect of the bill is its expansion of an existing problem: welfare payments targeted to illegal immigrants. Under current law‚ illegal immigrants who have children born in the U.S. (and many do) may claim cash welfare benefits from the ACTC. The committee bill would expand these cash welfare payments for millions of current illegal aliens and millions more who enter the country in the future—exacerbating a design flaw in the program.   The bill would substantially increase a means-tested welfare system that already costs over $1.2 trillion per year. Benefits in that system are already quite high. Under current law‚ for example‚ in 2023‚ a single mother with two school-age children earning $15‚000 per year also would receive $15‚476 in welfare benefits from the Earned Income Tax Credit‚ the Additional Child Tax Credit‚ and the food stamps and school nutrition programs. In addition‚ this family would be eligible for Medicaid coverage worth‚ on average‚ around $14‚950. Altogether‚ these standard welfare benefits would triple the parent’s income; total post-tax resources would come to around $44‚300. In addition‚ some (but not all) such families would receive Section 8 or other public housing aid worth around $10‚000‚ bringing total potential resources to around $54‚300. The Ways and Means Committee’s bill would add more cash welfare on top of this benefit pile. In this example‚ the single parent would receive an added $1‚875 in cash grants under the bill. This would bring the family’s total income to $46‚184‚ or $56‚184 if the family received housing aid. The problem isn’t simply the immediate benefit increase; rather‚ by camouflaging new welfare benefits as “tax relief” and failing to even hint at the welfare already received by its beneficiaries‚ the bill lays fertile ground for even more welfare expansions. A prominent goal of the Left is to remove work requirements from welfare and to restore the work-free‚ unconditional cash aid that existed before welfare reform.  Biden sought to advance this goal by creating a new “child allowance” that removed work requirements from the ACTC and greatly increased benefits. The Ways and Means Committee’s bill goes at least halfway toward fulfilling the president’s aims. The bill embraces the premises and goals of the Biden plan to greatly increase cash welfare payments (predominantly for single parents) while weakening or removing work requirements.  The bill sets the ground for a future “compromise” that would fully enact the Biden “child allowance” program. From this perspective‚ the committee’s bill represents an enormous political and policy victory for Biden.  The welfare portion of the bill directly and explicitly repudiates the principles of successful welfare reform‚ which have governed the welfare system since the mid-1990s. Welfare reform instituted in 1996 by a Republican-led Congress‚ with broad bipartisan support‚ established work requirements and time limits in the dominant welfare program: Aid to Families with Dependent Children‚ known as AFDC. Over 90% of recipients in this program were single-parent families. A principal aim of welfare reform was to halt the rapid and alarming disintegration of marriage. Family collapse had been steadily advancing for decades. Work requirements reduced the utility of being a single parent on welfare and raised the relative utility of being married to a working husband. As a result‚ the rapid decline in married families halted; non-marital teen births and abortions fell rapidly. Overall‚ there have been 10 million fewer abortions due to the changes initiated and promoted by welfare reform. Yet‚ the Ways and Means Committee’s bill would increase cash welfare subsidies to single parents relative to married families and weaken work requirements that predominantly affect single parents. It threatens family formation. Overall‚ the welfare portion of the bill would overturn the principles that conservatives have stood for in welfare and family policy for three decades. If enacted into law‚ it would be a major victory for the Left and a heavy blow for American families.  It also would be a big step backward on the road to reform of America’s broken welfare system. Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com‚ and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post House Panel’s Welfare Expansion Fails American Families appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Republican senators met Wednesday with a group of parents to discuss the state of education in the U.S. and school systems affected by woke ideology and critical race theory. Sens. Tommy Tuberville and Katie Britt of Alabama joined Sens. Ted Budd of North Carolina‚ Eric Schmitt of Missouri‚ and Roger Marshall of Kansas at the listening session‚ led by Nicole Neily‚ president of Parents Defending Education‚ in the Dirksen Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill. Eighteen parents from a number of states around the country sat around the table on Capitol Hill‚ and several of them spoke up to thank the senators for their efforts to fight back against woke education. They voiced concerns about the effects of not just gender ideology‚ but also leftist ethnic studies programs‚ the influence of the Chinese Communist Party‚ and new burdens placed on school districts by the immigration crisis the U.S. faces. “One major issue is that parents want to know what is being taught. They want to be involved in this‚” Neily said. “Districts now maintain what we call parental exclusion policies. As of this week‚ we’ve identified almost 1‚100 school districts across the country … infecting almost 11 million children and saying parents do not have a right to know their child’s gender at school.” She subsequently added: “We’re also concerned about immigration. This is placing new burdens on districts as migrants pour across the southern border. Recently in New York‚ the James Madison High School was forced to go remote while migrants were moved into the school‚ while in Chicago‚ families are angry that residents are required to provide vaccination records to enroll their child in public schools‚ yet migrants are allowed to enroll without such documents.” One mother from California‚ Sonja Shaw‚ warned that ethnic studies is the next frontier for leftist activists‚ noting that in her state‚ ethnic studies are a requirement for graduating: “It’s a gateway for hatred. It’s a gateway to brainwash our children.” Another mother‚ Now Wai Wah from New York‚ addressed concerns from parents about the immigration crisis and how it is affecting both children and education. She said that she herself is an immigrant‚ adding‚ “A lot of the residents in New York happen to be immigrants‚ and we think that New York is a special place that can provide good education.” She expressed fears about the way that migrants are being allowed into the country‚ warning: “This is impacting New York‚ but not just New York. In New York‚ we know that it is going to cost another $13 billion or so to take care of what has become like a small city of illegal migrants.” Tuberville told the parents that when Republicans “take the Senate‚” they must “do more of this.” Sen. Tommy Tuberville‚ R-Ala.‚ urged parents at a Capitol Hill meeting Wednesday to continue to let lawmakers know what’s going on in their schools and school districts. (Photo: Mary Margaret Olohan/The Daily Signal) “In this room right here‚ we’ll get away from having union meetings and have more about the real thing called education‚ and people like you brought here as witnesses‚” the Alabama lawmaker said. “Remember this‚” he added. “We go out campaigning. People ask‚ ‘How can we help?’ Run for school board‚ run for city council‚ run for county commission. Help your community. It doesn’t happen up here‚ folks. This is the facade. This is the icing on the cake. The cake is made in your neighborhoods. You control your neighborhoods; we don’t. Unfortunately‚ we hurt your neighborhoods‚ what goes on here.” Tuberville urged the parents to continue to let lawmakers know what is going on‚ predicting that the country is at a breaking point when it comes to education‚ as well as with regard to other issues. “They are the future‚” he said of the children in American education systems. “They are the No. 1 commodity that we have. It’s our kids. It’s our kids. We gotta remember that. Some reason‚ a lot of people up here don’t understand that. So‚ thank you.” Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com‚ and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.  The post Republican Senators Hold Listening Session With Parents Fighting Indoctrination in Schools appeared first on The Daily Signal.

It has been about 80 years since the Gilbert and Marshall Islands campaign‚ a bloody struggle against Japan during World War II that cost thousands of Americans their lives. Today‚ Congress is poised to squander their sacrifice for freedom by granting China a generational opportunity to severely undermine America’s security position in the Pacific. At issue are three long-standing‚ bilateral Compact of Free Association agreements between the United States and the Federated States of Micronesia‚ the Marshall Islands and the Republic of Palau. In exchange for modest financial assistance‚ each agreement grants the U.S. strategic denial rights and defense exclusivity with these nations. Strategic denial rights allow the U.S. to unilaterally block the Chinese‚ or any other military‚ from entering the countries covered by the compacts. Exclusive defense rights allow the U.S. to access compact waters and to construct military sites on the first and second island chains. These facilities could prove critical in a possible defense of Taiwan or in protecting and resupplying our Japanese‚ Korean‚ and Filipino allies in the event of a conflict with China. The U.S.-Marshall Islands Compact also allows the U.S. to test and improve missile accuracy by launching missiles from California that land on the Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands. Furthermore‚ Palau will host the new Tactical Multi-Mission Over-the-Horizon Radar system‚ which will grant the U.S. expanded air and maritime awareness in the Indo-Pacific. The compacts with Micronesia and the Marshall Islands formally expired Sept. 30. The recent short-term funding packages have kept the agreements on life support‚ and the U.S. has agreed to renew the agreements and maintain access for 20 years at a total cost of $7.1 billion. But it has not arranged for the funds to pay that bill. As is common with many congressional fights‚ the key holdup has been a dispute over how to pay for the compacts. In many cases‚ Congress requires spending increases to be offset by either a decrease in spending or an increase in revenue. In other words‚ Congress‚ like the American taxpayer‚ is encouraged to have a balanced budget. Despite knowing for years that an offset would be necessary to cover the relatively small sums involved‚ the White House has refused to make cuts to pay for the deals their negotiators struck‚ and Congress has been unable to agree on a bipartisan proposal that funds the compacts. Because of how the prior compacts were funded‚ Congress needs to offset only about $2.3 billion in new funding for all three countries across 20 years. That averages to around $40 million per country per year. It shouldn’t be difficult to find that money elsewhere‚ considering that between April 2021 and September 2022‚ the U.S. gave nearly $2 billion to Afghanistan‚ Venezuela‚ Pakistan‚ and the Palestinian territories—much less useful “investments” by far. Funding the compacts is the fiscally responsible move‚ as the agreements theoretically save the U.S. tens of billions of dollars‚ given the added military capabilities the U.S. would need to field and deploy to compensate for the loss of access. In comparison‚ since 1986‚ the U.S. has provided about $6.5 billion in assistance to the compact countries in return for defense access and military privileges. In addition‚ failing to renew the compacts leaves the U.S. less safe and raises major doubts about America’s ability to fund its key priorities and support its key allies in the Indo-Pacific. To nobody’s surprise‚ China is ready to pounce if the compact provisions expire. To avoid handing China a major strategic victory‚ Congress must find a way to fund the compacts. While Congress works to identify an offset‚ the Biden administration must offer better solutions. For example‚ rather than requesting $3.1 billion for a National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality‚ the administration could reallocate its budget request to cover the compacts. Options to pass the compacts seem limited. The National Defense Authorization Act doesn’t include the compacts; this is a missed opportunity. The compacts also could be included in a possible national security supplemental package. If neither of these options is feasible‚ then the House and Senate could pass the compacts as a stand-alone bill. Regardless of the pathway‚ time is not on America’s side. Congress is at a critical juncture. No other agreement in the world may match the value that Micronesia‚ the Marshall Islands‚ and Palau offer the United States in exchange for a relatively modest rounding error in the Pentagon’s budget. Failure to fund the compacts would constitute strategic malpractice by Congress. This commentary first was published by The Washington Times Have an opinion about this article? To sound off‚ please email letters@DailySignal.com‚ and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the URL or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state. The post Let’s Not Hand China a Victory in Pacific appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Government Workers Are Trying to Take Over Congress Now

MSM Frets Over How/If to Cover Trump