YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #nightsky #biology #planet #blood #jupiter #brazil #mars #fossil #paleontology #redplanet #dinosaur #conjunction #dinosaurblood #aratasaurusmuseunacionali
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 yrs Politics

rumbleRumble
The quad is a POWDER KEG: Are college campuses breeding the next revolution?
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

The Secrets of Rome’s Capuchin Crypt: Interview with Pietro Costantini
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

The Secrets of Rome’s Capuchin Crypt: Interview with Pietro Costantini

  The Church of Santa Maria della Concezione dei Cappuccini (Capuchins) is one of the most fascinating in Rome, and is best known for its incredible crypt. The underground crypt holds the remains of Capuchin monks, crafted into symbolic works of art. The site has fascinated visitors for centuries, including the Marquis de Sade, who wrote about it in his diary in 1775. “I have never seen anything more striking.” The crypts also inspired Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Marble Faun (1860) and Mark Twain’s Innocents Abroad (1869). Today, we learn more about the crypt and Richard Marranca interviews its director, Pietro Costantini, revealing little-known secrets.   Pietro Costantini has a Ph.D. from the University of Teramo, for which he wrote his thesis about the Capuchin Friars between the 16th and 18th centuries. He has served as Director of the Museum and Crypt of the Capuchins in Rome since September 2024. A fuller profile of Pietro is included at the bottom of this article.   Discovering the Capuchin Crypt Exterior view of the Church of Santa Maria della Concezione dei Cappuccini in Rome. Source: Wikimedia Commons   Richard Marranca (RM): So, the crypt, of course, is below your Church of Santa Maria. It’s on the Via Veneto near Piazza Berberini. By the way, the Via Veneto was featured in scenes of the classic movie La Dolce Vita. You are just around the corner from the Fountain of Trevi and Vatican City. What’s it like being in one of the world’s centers?   Pietro Costanini (PC): Being located in such an iconic place as Via Veneto, near Piazza Barberini, is an extraordinary privilege. Our church, with its unique crypt, is not only a historical and spiritual landmark but also a site that harmoniously fits into one of the most captivating areas of Rome. Being close to landmarks like the Trevi Fountain and just a few kilometers from Vatican City allows us to welcome visitors from all over the world, drawn by the beauty of the Eternal City and the profound spiritual message that our complex represents.   Via Veneto is a place where history, culture, and spirituality converge. This makes our environment even more special. It is an oasis of reflection amidst the dynamism of one of Rome’s most famous streets. Being here means safeguarding a spiritual and artistic treasure that continues to inspire and captivate all who visit.   Famous Visitors Over the Centuries Interior of the Church of Santa Maria della Concezione dei Cappuccini in Rome. Source: Wikimedia Commons   RM: The crypt has had many notable visitors over the centuries, such as Mark Twain, Oscar Wilde, and so many others. Marquis de Sade wrote, “I have never seen something so striking.” Why all the fascination?    PC: The crypt captivates with its uniqueness and the profound message it conveys. The decorations made with the bones of friars and benefactors are not only an extraordinary work of art but also a powerful reminder of the fragility and transience of human life. The inscription, “What you are now, we once were; what we are now, you shall be,” invites visitors to reflect on the meaning of life and death in a way that few other places can.   This combination of aesthetics, spirituality, and existential reflection is what has captured the imagination of notable figures and continues to profoundly impact anyone who visits this unique site. The crypt is not merely a tourist attraction but an emotional and spiritual experience that leaves an indelible impression.   A Sacred Space for the Capuchin Monks Historical photo of a monk in Rome’s Capuchin Crypt. Source: Liturgical Arts Journal   RM: Can you tell us how the crypt is used by monks and visitors for sacred experiences?   PC: The crypt is a sacred place, conceived not only as a memorial but also as a space for prayer and reflection. For the friars, it represents an environment where they can meditate on the mystery of life and death and honor the deceased friars who preceded them in the Order. This aligns with Capuchin spirituality, which encourages living with humility and awareness of the transience of earthly existence.   Every year, on November 2nd, during All Souls’ Day, the friars celebrate Holy Mass in the crypt. This rite is a particularly meaningful moment, dedicated to praying for the souls of the departed and renewing the remembrance of their journey in the Christian faith.   For visitors, too, the crypt offers a unique opportunity for a spiritual experience. Beyond its beauty and symbolism, it invites personal reflection and connection with the mystery of eternity. Many find in this place an occasion for introspection and prayer, drawing inspiration from the universal message it conveys.   How Was the Crypt Created? Part of the Capuchin Crypt in Rome. Source: Wikimedia Commons   RM: Can you tell us about Fr. Michael of Bergamo? And was the soil in the crypt really brought from Jerusalem by order of Pope Urban VII? Can you tell us about the Capuchin Monks?   PC: Father Michael of Bergamo was the architect entrusted with designing the church and friary of the Capuchins on Via Veneto, completed in 1631. In addition to constructing the buildings, he also designed the crypt below, intended to serve as a burial place for the friars in accordance with Capuchin regulations, which prohibited burials inside the churches.   Regarding the soil in the crypt, there is a tradition suggesting it was brought from Jerusalem by order of Pope Urban VII. However, there is no documentary evidence to confirm this story, adding an element of fascination and mystery to this unique site. The Capuchin Friars, a branch of the Order of Friars Minor founded by St. Francis of Assisi, are known for their simplicity, humility, and closeness to the poor. Their brown habit with the characteristic hood, from which the name “Capuchins” is derived, and their life devoted to prayer and service, embody the Franciscan spirit.   The Macabre Art of the Crypt Resurrection Chapel in the Capuchin Crypt with a painting showing Jesus resurrecting Lazarus, Rome. Source: Flickr   RM: Can you tell us some of the basics? How many bodies? What was the process? How did they come to be placed in the crypt?   PC: The crypt holds the bones of approximately 3,700 deceased individuals buried between 1631 and 1870. The remains also include those from the previous Capuchin convent near the Trevi Fountain, which were transferred to the new complex designed by Father Michael of Bergamo. The burials adhered to the Capuchin rule, requiring an underground cemetery separate from the main church.   Due to limited space and the high number of friars being buried, periodic exhumations were carried out to make room for new burials. The bones were then arranged artistically, creating decorations and symbols that now adorn the six chapels of the crypt. The idea of using the bones to create a unique work of art seems to have emerged around the mid-18th century, with the artistic arrangement completed, at least partially, by 1764.   Chapel of the Three Skeletons Chapel of the Three Skeletons in the Capuchin Crypt, Rome. Source: Liturgical Arts Journal   RM: Can you tell us a few of the special features of the crypts, such as the center skeleton in the Crypt of the Three Skeletons?   PC: The Chapel of the Three Skeletons is one of the most evocative spaces in the crypt. At its center, a small skeleton, possibly that of Princess Anna Barberini, is enclosed in an oval halo, symbolizing life. In its right hand, it holds a scythe, a symbol of death that comes to all, while in its left hand, it holds a scale, representing God’s judgment after death. Surrounding this figure are crosses made of sacral bones, floral decorations composed of clavicles and vertebrae, and rosettes crafted from jawbones, creating a unique work of art that invites reflection on the mystery of life and death.   This crypt also features three children’s skeletons, placed as a reminder that death knows no age. The remains of Capuchin friars dressed in their characteristic habits complete the scene, delivering a profound spiritual message in line with Christian and Franciscan tradition.   Other Incredible Chapels Chapel of the Pelvises in the Capuchin Crypt, Rome. Source: Wikimedia Commons   RM: Can you share some of the special features of the other chapels?   PC: The Crypt of the Skulls is characterized by decorations made with skulls and long bones.   Three skeletons of Capuchin friars stand upright in niches. The tympanum of the central niche features an hourglass with scapula wings, symbolizing the fleeting nature of time and the urgency of living a virtuous life.   In the Crypt of the Pelvises, the entire back wall is decorated with pelvises and other bones arranged to form a large canopy. The friars rest peacefully in niches adorned with floral motifs made from bones, showcasing how artistic beauty can emerge even from mortal remains.   The Mass Chapel is the only area without bones, reserved for the celebration of Mass for the dead. Above the altar is a painting depicting Mary with the Child and the souls in Purgatory being freed from the flames. It is a place of meditation and prayer.   The Crypt of the Resurrection is decorated with bones forming arches and rosettes. It includes a painting of the resurrection of Lazarus, a symbol of Christian hope in eternal life.   Profile: Pietro Costantini, Director of the Museum and Crypt of the Capuchins in Rome Pietro Costantini, Director of the Museum and Crypt of the Capuchins in Rome   Pietro Costantini graduated with honors from the University of Teramo, with a thesis on the Venetian painter Jacobello del Fiore, under the supervision of Professor Raffaella Morselli. He holds a Ph.D. in “Historical Studies from the Middle Ages to the Contemporary Age” from the same university, with a dissertation in early modern art history focused on the cultural policies of the Capuchin Friars in Abruzzo between the 16th and 18th centuries.   He is currently a research fellow within the PRIN 2022 project “Margaret of Austria and the Courts of L’Aquila, Cittaducale, and Ortona.” He conducts various seminar activities complementary to modern art history courses and training programs for teachers of all levels on the use of digital technologies in artistic and museum research and promotion.   In 2018, he was an adjunct professor for the “Digital Humanities” workshop at the University of Teramo, and in 2019 for the course “Artistic, Cultural, Museum, and Archaeological Heritage” as part of the R.E.A.L.S.T.A.R.T. project. In 2020, he was a research fellow at the Venanzo Crocetti Foundation in Rome.   From 2021 to 2023, he was a member of the research group for the European project “Virtual Reality Science Tour” (VRSciT), in partnership with institutions and universities in Spain, Portugal, and Lithuania.   Since 2022, he has been adjunct faculty in Modern Art History at the University of Teramo, and since 2023, he has been an associate member of the inter-university research center METArte, focused on technological innovation in art historical, museographic research, and heritage diagnostics.   Since 2024, he has been a member of the Research Unit “Cultural, Religious, and Political Exchanges and Connections (16th-21st Centuries),” coordinated by Professor Massimo Carlo Giannini. Since September 2024, he has served as Director of the Museum and Crypt of the Capuchins in Rome.   He is an adjunct professor for the workshop “Smart Heritage: New Technologies for Cultural Heritage” at the University of Teramo and, from the same year, adjunct faculty in Modern Art History at Sapienza University of Rome.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

Wild Bill Hickok: The Legendary Lawman of the Wild West
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Wild Bill Hickok: The Legendary Lawman of the Wild West

  Wild Bill Hickok’s life story was subject to huge amounts of exaggeration. His deeds were told and retold in grandiose style to adoring audiences obsessed with tales of larger-than-life characters and their wild adventures.   Hickok, however, hardly needed the exaggeration. He was among the most dangerous men in the Old West and commanded respect, admiration, fear, and, for some, hatred. His life would go down as one of the most legendary in the history of America.   Wild Bill’s Early Life Troy Grove, Illinois. Source: Jimmy Emerson, DVM on Flickr   James Butler Hickok entered the world on May 27, 1837, the fourth of six children born to William Alonzo Hickok and Pamelia Hickok (née Butler). His father was a staunch abolitionist, and it is claimed that their house in Homer (now Troy Grove), Illinois was a station on the Underground Railroad, a network of routes and safe houses used to transport escaped slaves to safety and freedom.   On May 5, 1852, William died of unknown causes. It’s possible that his death may have been linked to his activities trying to free enslaved people.   According to contemporary accounts, James had red hair and showed significant skill as a marksman. This skill served him well, as he and his brothers often went hunting to provide food for the family.   The Illinois and Michigan Canal. Source: Joseph Balynas courtesy of the Illinois & Michigan National Heritage Area via the National Park Service   James’ first job was as a drover working along the Illinois-Michigan Canal, which connected the Great Lakes to the Mississippi River. However, his time in this profession did not last, and he traveled westward in search of better opportunities.   According to legend, this decision was forced upon him after he got into a fight with a fellow drover, Charles Hudson, who bullied James. The two came to blows and ended up in the canal, wherein James thought he had killed Hudson by drowning him. If this story is true, his decision to travel westward was an escape rather than a simple decision to look for better opportunities. Hudson was later said to have survived the encounter.   Wild Bill in Kansas Hickok at the age of 21. Source: Jackson County Historical Society / Photo courtesy of Craig Crease.   Before Kansas was incorporated into the Union as a state, it was a wild and lawless place that was known for its violence between pro- and anti-slavery groups. It was in this maelstrom that 18-year-old James Hickok found himself. Like his father, James was wholly against slavery and joined an anti-slavery militia called the Free State Army or the “Jayhawkers.”   During this time, he met the young William Cody (later known as “Buffalo Bill”). Hickok had intervened in a run-in between Buffalo Bill and another man, preventing him from beating William. The future Buffalo Bill was just 11 or 12 years old, but despite his youth, he would serve as a scout in the US Army during the Utah War. Hickok and Cody became lifelong friends.   Hickok’s reputation for fairness stood him in good stead, and in 1858, he became a constable in the town of Monticello in Kansas. He then joined the freighting team of Russell, Majors, and Waddell, who together created the Pony Express. During his time in this outfit, Hickok encountered a bear. He shot the bear, but it did not deter the animal from further action. It attacked Hickok, and in the ensuing struggle, Hickok managed to slit the bear’s throat, killing it. Hickok, however, sustained several injuries, and it took many months for him to heal.   In 1861, Hickok traveled to Rock Creek in southern Nebraska to work on the Pony Express station. It was there that he would be involved in a legendary gunfight.   Shootout at Rock Creek Portrait of Wild Bill Hickok. Source: pxhere.com   Legends abound over what happened at Rock Creek on July 12, 1861, and while the truth is hard to pin down, it was there that James Hickok achieved fame. The subject of Hickok’s ire was the manager of Rock Creek Station, David McCanles, who, it was said, ridiculed Hickok as he was recovering from his injuries. McCanles also referred to James as “Duck Bill” on account of James’ protruding upper lip—a feature Hickok later covered with a mustache. McCanles was later replaced as station manager, but he and Hickok had unresolved business that would come to a head.   David McCanles. Source: Nebraska State Historical Society / Wikimedia Commons; with Reconstruction of Rock Creek Station in Jefferson County, Nebraska. Source: Ammodramus / Wikimedia Commons   The account of what happened is subject to debate. It was first reported in detail in 1867—six years after the fact—in Harper’s New Monthly Magazine, which was known for its exaggerations.   According to Harper’s and legend, in 1861, Hickok was guiding a detachment of Union cavalry when he decided to visit Horace Wellman, the man who had replaced McCanles as station manager. Hickok was greeted at the door by Wellman’s wife, who informed Hickok that Confederates led by McCanles were pursuing him. Without any time to prepare, the Confederates arrived and set upon the Union forces. According to this account, Hickok shot McCanles in the chest and killed several other members of the Confederate gang.   Later, historians challenged this retelling and suggested that the shootout took place at Rock Creek Station, and McCanles was after payment that he was owed by Wellman. McCanles entered the station and was shot either by Hickok or Wellman. Hickok then shot McCanles’ cousin, James Woods, who was ultimately killed by Mrs. Wellman, armed with a hoe.   Hickok During the Civil War Buffalo Bill Cody photographed by José María Mora, ca. 1875. Source: National Portrait Gallery / Wikimedia Commons   There were plenty of opportunities during the Civil War for Hickok. He worked as a teamster, driving draft animals for the Union forces, and by the end of 1861, he had become a wagon master. He would not hold this position for long, however, and was discharged for unknown reasons.   However, this would not be the end of Hickok’s service to the Union. He joined a Jayhawker partisan group called the Kansas Brigade, during which time he re-encountered “Buffalo Bill” Cody, who was serving as a scout. By the end of 1862, Hickok was working for the Provost Marshal of Missouri as a military policeman. It was a difficult time for many, as the Union was struggling for funds to pay its soldiers. Thus, Hickok’s duties included locating individuals who owed money to the Union Army.   The common soldiers, however, weren’t the only ones waiting to be paid. Hickok went several months without a salary. Buffalo Bill claimed that during this time, he encountered Hickok disguised as a Confederate working as a spy for the Union. In early 1865, Hickok was hired as a scout.   After the war, Hickok indulged in gambling and spent much time playing cards in the saloons of Springfield, Missouri.   The Duel That Created a Legend A marker in Springfield, Missouri, where Hickok stood when he shot Davis Tutt. Source: monumentalwashington.zenfolio.com   The quick-draw duel is a common theme that became firmly lodged in the mythos of the Old West. The first of its kind was recorded in Springfield, Missouri, on July 21, 1865. The two men who faced off were Wild Bill Hickok and Davis Tutt.   The incident was caused by a disagreement over a debt. Hickok owed Tutt money, and Tutt demanded Hickok pay him $35. Hickok maintained that the sum in question was only $25. Tutt grabbed Hickok’s pocket watch off the table, but Hickok did not respond with violence. With the intention of resolving the conflict at a later point, Hickok warned Tutt not to wear the watch in public; this would have been a sign of humiliation.   Tutt ignored Hickok’s advice, and in the early hours of the evening, the duel was fought. They were 75 yards apart when they fired at each other. Tutt’s shot missed, while Hickok’s found its mark in Tutt’s chest. Tutt stumbled a few feet before dropping to the ground, dead. Several days later, Hickok was arrested and charged with manslaughter but was acquitted by the jury.   Wild Bill, the Lawman Wild Bill Hickok. Source: MS 71 Vincent Mercaldo Collection. P.71.475 via Buffalo Bill Center of the West.   After the duel with Davis Tutt, Hickok skyrocketed to fame across the nation, especially after a story penned by Sir Henry Morton Stanley appeared in the New York Herald, claiming Wild Bill Hickok had killed over 100 people!   In the years following the duel, Hickok worked as a guide and scout for notable military figures such as General William T. Sherman, General Winfield Scott Hancock, and Lieutenant Colonel George Armstong Custer. The latter and his wife, Elizabeth, were especially taken with Hickok. Despite his hardy lifestyle and wild ways, Hickok was said to have been a courteous gentleman.   In 1869, Wild Bill Hickok became the sheriff of Hays City, Kansas and had several run-ins with outlaws. Shootouts were common, and Hickok killed many men as a result. In 1871, he became the marshal of Abilene and brought order to a lawless town. After an accidental shooting, however, Hickok was relieved of his position. Hickok had been in a shootout with Phil Coe, the owner of a saloon, when out of the corner of his eye, he glimpsed a figure moving towards him. Hickok reacted and shot twice, killing his target. Sadly for the victim and Hickok, the target had been Deputy Marshal Mike Williams.   After Williams’ death, Hickok was relieved of duty. The episode would haunt him for the rest of his life, and he would never be in another shootout ever again.   Hickok’s Final Years The cast of Scouts of the Prairie. From left to right, Elisha P. Green, James Butler Hickok, William F. “Buffalo Bill” Cody, John B. “Texas Jack” Omohundro, and Eugene Overton. Source: R.H. Furman photograph / Buffalo Bill Center of the West   After his stint as a law enforcer, Hickok tried his hand at acting, hoping to profit from the popularity of Wild West shows. His own production, The Daring Buffalo Chase of the Plains, did not perform as expected. Hickok then moved to New York, where he performed in The Scouts of the Prairie, which was run by his old friend, Buffalo Bill Cody.   By 1876, Hickok had developed glaucoma, which severely affected his career as a sharpshooter. His life became rudderless, and he moved from town to town as an itinerant gambler. He was even arrested on one occasion for vagrancy. In March 1876, Hickok married Agnes Thatcher Lake, a circus owner in Wyoming, but just months later, he left her to pursue his fortune in the goldfields of South Dakota.   He was said to have become romantically involved with Martha Jane Canary, better known as “Calamity Jane,” but historians generally discount this apocryphal tale.   Hickok’s Famous Death Sign in Saloon Number 10. Source: Jens Bludau / Wikimedia Commons   On August 1, 1876, Hickok was playing poker in Nuttal & Mann’s Saloon No. 10 in the town of Deadwood, Dakota Territory. A man named Jack McCall joined the game and was handily beaten. McCall, drunk and now penniless, was urged by Hickok to leave the game. Hickok offered to buy McCall breakfast, and McCall accepted and left. This was, however, not the last encounter Hickok would have with the man.   The next day, Hickok was back at the saloon. He usually never sat with his back to the door, but on this occasion, it was the only seat available. McCall walked into the saloon and ordered a drink. Moments later, he drew his revolver and shot Hickok in the back of the head at point-blank range. Hickok was just 39 years old at the time.   According to modern legend, the hand Hickok was holding at the time consisted of the two black aces and black eights, and it has since become known as the “dead man’s hand.”   According to historian Carl W. Breihan, Hickok’s cards were picked up by a man named Neil Christy, who passed them on to his son. The son reported to Breihan that the cards were indeed the ace of diamonds, the ace of clubs, the two black eights, and the queen of hearts, the latter of which had a drop of Hickok’s blood on it.   Hickok was buried in Mount Moriah Cemetery in Deadwood, the resting place of Calamity Jane, Seth Bullock, and several other famous figures of the Wild West. Meanwhile, Jack McCall was tried twice before being found guilty. He was hanged on March 1, 1877.   “Dead man’s hand.” Source: Tage Olsin / Wikimedia Commons   Wild Bill Hickok was a legend in his own time and in the ages that followed. His deeds, however fanciful, were recounted and often exaggerated, firmly stamping his place in the annals of American history as a celebrated gunslinger and hero of the Wild West.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

Napoleon’s Life, Family, and Personal Traits
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Napoleon’s Life, Family, and Personal Traits

  While in exile on the island of Saint Helena, Napoleon remarked to a loyal follower, “What a novel my life has been!” (Gueniffey, 1). Indeed, many aspects of Napoleon’s biography read like fiction. For example, by his mid-twenties, Napoleon was already a successful commanding general. By the time he crowned himself Emperor of the French in 1804, Napoleon ruled a country that extended its borders to include swaths of Italy, Switzerland, Germany, and the Low Countries (Leggiere, 1). Below, we’ll explore the details behind Napoleon’s remarkable life and career.   Where Was Napoleon Born? Photograph of the Napoleon Monument in Place Austerlitz, Ajaccio, Corsica. Source: Wikimedia Commons   Napoleon Bonaparte, France’s future ruler and conqueror of much of Europe, was born on the Mediterranean island of Corsica on August 15, 1769. The Republic of Genoa ruled the island before selling it to France in 1768.   France acquired the island amid a struggle for independence led by the charismatic Pasquale Paoli. Despite initial military setbacks, French troops forced Paoli into exile.   Napoleon’s parents, Carlo and Letizia, had eight children who survived infancy. Joseph was their oldest son, followed by Napoleon. Lucien, Elisa, Louis, Pauline, Caroline, and Jerome followed. Historian Patrice Gueniffey explains that both of Napoleon’s parents had ancestral roots in present-day Italy. His ancestors arrived in Corsica during the 16th century (2014, 19).   While Napoleon’s parents supported Paoli, they decided to make peace with French officials. This decision paved the way for Napoleon’s future in France. Indeed, Frank McLynn points out that Napoleon began his military schooling in France in 1779. At the time, McLynn notes, Napoleon was a committed Corsican nationalist who idolized Paoli (2003, 18-19).   The young Napoleon would not break with his childhood hero’s Corsican patriotism until the early 1790s. By the end of 1793, Napoleon had participated in his first battle and became a hero in Revolutionary France for his role in the siege of Toulon. At the same time, Patrice Gueniffey notes that Napoleon’s family was no longer welcome in Corsica (2014, 120). Napoleon’s destiny would be shaped in France and not Corsica.   How Tall Was Napoleon? “The Plumb-pudding in danger, or, State epicures taking un petit souper,” by James Gillray, February 28, 1805. Source: Wikimedia Commons/Library of Congress, Washington DC   Scholars have debated the question of Napoleon’s height as they have virtually every aspect of his life and career. According to historian Martyn Lyons, Napoleon “was a short man, even by the standards of the day” (1994, 1). Others suggest that our popular perception of Napoleon’s stature is the remnant of anti-Napoleonic propaganda.   You might be familiar with Napoleon’s nickname, the “Little Corporal.” Napoleon earned this affectionate nickname from his troops during his first successful campaign in Italy in 1796-1797. Historian David A. Bell notes that one French sergeant in 1796 considered Napoleon to be “small, skinny, very pale, with big black eyes and sunken cheeks” (2019, 29).   As Martyn Lyons points out, Napoleon’s enemies tended to call him “Boney” and the “Ogre” (1994, 1). So, was Napoleon the “Little Corporal” or a monstrous “Ogre?”   Napoleon’s height does not appear to correspond to the familiar satirical political cartoons of the age. According to most measurement methods of the era, Napoleon was not as short as often depicted in popular memory. The myth of his dramatically short stature originated from British propaganda. For example, British cartoonist James Gillray frequently depicted a diminutive Napoleon in his satirical political cartoons.   Nevertheless, Napoleon was not particularly tall, as we know from first-hand accounts. For example, Andrew Roberts notes that Arab historian Niqula al-Turk described Napoleon during the French invasion of Egypt in 1798 as “short, thin, and pale” (2014, 177).   Napoleon and Josephine The Coronation of Napoleon and the Coronation of Josephine at Notre Dame de Paris, December 2, 1804, by Jacques-Louis David, 1805-1807. Source: Wikimedia Commons   Napoleon married Marie Josèphe Rose Tascher de La Pagerie in March 1796. However, at the time of their marriage, she was known as the widow de Beauharnais. Moreover, Napoleon knew his wife by another name altogether: Josephine.   The woman Napoleon christened Josephine came from a family of prominent French settlers on the Caribbean islands of Martinique and Saint Lucia. Historians know little about her youth before her arrival in Paris at the age of seventeen in 1780.   Josephine was the mother of two children from her first marriage to General Alexandre Vicomte de Beauharnais. Historian Andrew Roberts notes that Josephine’s first marriage was an unhappy one. Beauharnais was abusive and even resorted to kidnapping their son during one of Josephine’s attempts to escape her husband (2014, 69).   Nevertheless, according to Roberts, Josephine tried to save her husband from the guillotine during the Terror in the French Revolution and was nearly guillotined herself (2014, 69).   By 1807, Napoleon cemented his control of the European continent by forging closer ties with Tsar Alexander I of Russia. At this point, Napoleon’s concerns turned to family and the absence of an heir. As Frank McLynn notes, debates raged in Napoleon’s inner circle about which royal house should be approached to arrange a marriage upon his divorce. Some, including Napoleon, sought a Russian princess. Others favored a match with a Habsburg princess. Ultimately, Napoleon divorced Josephine and married Marie-Louise of Austria (2003, 381-382).   Napoleon’s Letters to Josephine Portrait of Josephine de Beauharnais, by François Gérard, 1801. Source: Wikimedia Commons/Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg, Russia   Napoleon wrote a seemingly endless stream of passionate and often scandalously erotic letters to Josephine. Andrew Roberts explains that Napoleon wrote hundreds of pages to Josephine during his 1796 campaign in Italy. Despite the romantic nature of these letters, Roberts notes that Napoleon often signed them “Bonaparte” or simply “BP” just as he signed off orders to subordinate officers (2014, 82).   As a newlywed campaigning in Italy in 1796, Napoleon frequently wrote Josephine to join him in Milan. While she eventually left Paris to join Napoleon, Josephine had little desire to leave for Italy. Historian Martin Boycott-Brown notes that Josephine was having an affair with a young French officer. However, Boycott-Brown says Josephine gave Napoleon the excuse that she may have been pregnant and could not travel (2001, 321). Despite mutual infidelities over the years, Napoleon and Josephine formed a powerful team that helped Napoleon navigate his rise to power.   Napoleon’s letters and those of other leading French officials became a valued commodity for British propagandists. For instance, Andrew Roberts says British officials published captured French correspondence between 1798 and 1800. Most of these captured letters focused on French military reversals in Egypt. However, some were more personally damaging to Napoleon. For example, several letters from Napoleon to his brother Joseph detailed Josephine’s excessive spending and corruption (2014, 171-172).   Overall, Napoleon’s letters to Josephine reflected a key component of his personality: his boundless energy and ability to multi-task. For example, David Bell notes that in 1796-1797 alone, Napoleon wrote or dictated nearly two thousand letters (2019, 28).   Did Napoleon Have Children? Portrait of Napoleon II, the King of Rome, by Thomas Lawrence, c. 1818-1819. Source: Wikimedia Commons/Harvard Art Museums, Cambridge, Massachusetts   According to Andrew Roberts, had Napoleon’s empire been ruled by an established dynasty like the Habsburgs, it might have survived the succession of a brother or nephew to the throne. However, since the empire was only a few years old, Napoleon faced considerable personal and political pressure to father a legitimate heir to the throne (2014, 536).   Before marrying Austrian Princess Marie Louise in 1810, Napoleon had two illegitimate sons, Charles Léon Denuelle de la Plaigne and Alexandre-Florian-Joseph Colonna, Count Walewski. The French aristocrat Émilie Pellapra claimed to be Napoleon’s daughter. However, scholars suspect this claim to be false.   Napoleon believed he secured his dynasty’s future with the birth of his son, Napoleon François Charles Joseph Bonaparte, in March 1811. Napoleon’s heir is also remembered as Napoleon II, the King of Rome, and his Austrian title, the Duke of Reichstadt.   Napoleon was also the stepfather to Josephine’s children, Eugène and Hortense. Eugène became one of Napoleon’s most trusted lieutenants. For example, historian Alexander Mikaberidze explains that Eugène became the Viceroy of the Kingdom of Italy (2020, 285).   Napoleon arranged an unhappy marriage between Hortense and his brother, Louis. Ultimately, their son, Louis-Napoleon, would follow in his uncle’s footsteps and rule France as Emperor Napoleon III.   What Happened to Napoleon’s Son? Joseph Franque, The Empress Marie-Louise Watching Over the Sleeping King of Rome, 1811, Oil on canvas, National Museum of the Palaces of Versailles and Trianon. Source: Wikimedia Commons/National Museum of the Palaces of Versailles and Trianon, Versailles, France   Napoleon II lived a tragically short and isolated life. As a child, he briefly served as the disputed successor to his father as Emperor of the French. However, he was destined never to rule or return to France. Instead, he became known as Franz, the Duke of Reichstadt, and lived in Vienna. He died of tuberculosis at the age of 21 in 1832.   His father, Napoleon I, died in exile on the remote island of Saint Helena in May 1821. According to Andrew Roberts, Napoleon last saw his young son and Marie Louise in late January 1814 (2014, 692).   References and Further Reading    Bell, D.A. (2019). Napoleon: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.   Boycott-Brown, M. (2001). The Road to Rivoli: Napoleon’s First Campaign. Cassell & Co.   Gueniffey, P. (2015). Bonaparte: 1769–1802. (S. Rendall, Trans.). The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (Original work published 2013).   Leggiere, M.V. (2007). The Fall of Napoleon: The Allied Invasion of France 1813-1814. Cambridge.   Lyons, M. (1994). Napoleon Bonaparte and the Legacy of the French Revolution. Macmillan Education.   McLynn, F. (2003). Napoleon: A Biography. Pimlico.   Mikaberidze, A. (2020). The Napoleonic Wars: A Global History. Oxford University Press.   Roberts, A. (2014). Napoleon the Great. Penguin.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

8 Key Battles of Napoleon
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

8 Key Battles of Napoleon

  Napoleon proved to be a capable military commander from a young age. From his actions during the Siege of Toulon to his accession as Emperor of the French to his final defeat at Waterloo, Napoleon stamped his legacy upon the continent of Europe and beyond.   The history of his wars has provided historians and analysts with many lifetimes of learning. The battles he fought are studied today as lessons of strategy and tactics from the mind of one of the world’s most revered generals.   These are eight of Napoleon’s key battles.   1. The Battle of the Pyramids (1798) General view of the Battle of the Pyramids, July 21, 1798. Egyptian Campaign (1798-1801) by Louis-François Lejeune, 1806. Source: Wikimedia Commons   In 1798, the French invaded Egypt with the goal of disrupting British interests in the region. Opposing the French, however, was not the British but the Ottoman Empire, which held control over Egypt.   Also known as the Battle of Embabeh, the Battle of the Pyramids was fought on July 21, after Napoleon had captured Alexandria and marched south. The French fielded around 25,000 troops, while the Mamluk rulers, under the thrall of the Ottomans, fielded as many as twice that, according to some estimates.   During the battle, Napoleon proved the effectiveness of the divisional square, a formation designed to ward off cavalry attacks. The French were so successful in the battle that they inflicted 10,000 casualties while only suffering 289 deaths and wounded.   After the battle, Napoleon marched into Cairo and took control of Egypt, setting up a French-controlled administration and forming a foundation from which the French could threaten British assets further to the east, including India.   2. The Battle of Marengo (1800) The Battle of Marengo by Louis-François Lejeune. Source: Wikimedia Commons   The Battle of Marengo, fought on June 14, 1800, was an extremely important engagement during the War of the Second Coalition. This conflict pitted France, Spain, and their client states against the Holy Roman Empire and its allies.   Fought on the Marengo Plain in Northern Italy, Napoleon’s army numbered around 28,000, while his Austrian opponents fielded around 31,000 under the command of General Michael Friedrich von Melas.   Surprising the Austrians, Napoleon maneuvered his forces into Italy by crossing the Alps, a move that mirrored the actions of Hannibal Barca two millennia earlier during the Second Punic War between Carthage and Rome.   Napoleon Crossing the Alps by Jacques-Louis David, 1801-1805. Source: Wikimedia Commons   Napoleon reached Milan and cut Austrian supply lines, a position from where he could threaten the Austrian capital of Vienna. Melas moved against Napoleon’s army, and the two met at Marengo.   Initially, the battle swung in favor of the Austrians, who forced the French into a slow retreat. With reinforcements arriving, the French reformed their lines and were able to counterattack and outflank the Austrians in a move that resulted in Napoleon winning a close-run battle.   To the north, French troops in Germany also saw success against the Austrians, and the Austrians were forced to sue for peace.   3. The Battle of Austerlitz (1805) Eve of the Battle of Austerlitz, 1805 by Louis Albert Guislain Bacler d’Albe, 1808. Source: Wikimedia Commons   The Battle of Austerlitz, also known as the Battle of the Three Emperors, was one of the most critical engagements during the Napoleonic Wars. It is cited as an example of Napoleon’s tactical brilliance.   In 1805, Napoleon’s naval ambitions were scuppered after the French and Spanish fleets were defeated at the Battle of Trafalgar. Nevertheless, on the continent, Napoleon’s forces reigned supreme. The British managed to organize a coalition against the French, consisting of Austria, Russia, Sweden, and Naples. The hope was that the combined forces of these nations would be able to defeat Napoleon on the continent.   Despite achieving victory at the Battle of Ulm and dealing the Austrians a major blow, Napoleon knew that he had to win another major victory lest his forces become overwhelmed. The Austrians avoided further conflict and waited for the Russians to arrive, while Napoleon feigned weakness in a bid to lure the Coalition forces into a reckless offensive maneuver.   The resultant battle on December 2, 1805, saw Napoleon’s army of around 70,000 soldiers defeat the Russians and Austrians, who numbered around 73,000 to 89,000 soldiers. The engagement was decisive, with the Russians and Austrians taking 27,000 to 30,000 casualties, while the French lost just under 9,000 killed or wounded.   The outcome brought an end to the Third Coalition and the creation of the Confederation of the Rhine, which was a series of states that formed a buffer between the French Empire and their enemies in the east. This political development also resulted in the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire, while France gained lands in Italy and Bavaria.   4. The Twin Battles of Jena and Auerstedt (1806) The Battle of Jena, Germany, 14th October 1806 by Edme Bovinet. Source: meisterdrucke.us   Jena and Auerstedt were fought on October 14, 1806, between Napoleon’s forces and the Prussians at the beginning of the War of the Fourth Coalition. This war was the direct result of Austria’s defeat and Prussia’s fear of further French conquest.   The Prussians declared war on October 9, 1806, and just a few days later, two decisive battles would be fought. The Prussian army, once highly formidable, was commanded by old leaders using outdated tactics and consisted of soldiers using inferior muskets. Meanwhile, the French army was modern and efficient.   The disparities became clear when the armies clashed on the fields of Jena and Auerstedt in Saxony. Napoleon split his army to deal with the Prussians. At Jena, he commanded the forces directly and overwhelmed the Prussian defenders, while at Auerstedt, French troops under Marshal Davout achieved stunning success against a much larger Prussian force.   Prussia’s prestige was shattered, and the kingdom was humiliated by being subjugated by France. This subjugation would last until 1813, when Prussia took the opportunity to break free from French control after Napoleon’s failed invasion of Russia.   5. The Battle of Wagram (1809) French cavalry charge depicted in The Battle of Wagram by Henri-Georges Chartier, 1897. Source: Wikimedia Commons   On July 6, 1809, Napoleon’s army inflicted a monumental defeat on the Austrians at Wagram. This battle spelled the end of the Fifth Coalition, a coalition of nations arrayed against Napoleon’s imperial ambitions.   In 1809, British intervention in the Peninsular War in Iberia forced Napoleon to divert much of his strength to the West. Taking advantage of the weakened French presence in the Confederation of the Rhine, the Austrian Empire invaded Bavaria, an ally of France.   The French response was powerful, and Vienna fell in May. Nevertheless, under Archduke Charles of Austria-Teschen, the Austrians managed to mobilize a sizable army to challenge the French forces. He defeated Napoleon at the Battle of Aspern-Essling, and Napoleon’s situation became significantly more difficult. He desperately needed a great victory to force the Austrians to capitulate.   At Wagram, the armies were equally matched in manpower, with both sides likely having more than 150,000 troops. Charles arrayed his forces along a 14-mile (23-kilometer) front, with the town of Wagram in the center. Knowing that Charles had 30,000 reinforcements en route, Napoleon decided to attack first on July 5 but was beaten back.   The following Austrian attack in the south also failed, while Napoleon’s main attack in the north succeeded. Following this, Napoleon went for the Austrian center. The Austrian lines broke, and the army was in full retreat before the 30,000 reinforcements could even arrive.   The result was a victory that forced Charles to sign an armistice. The casualty rate was enormous on both sides, with the French losing around 34,000 men and the Austrians losing over 40,000.   6. The Battle of Borodino (1812) Detail of Napoleon Near Borodino by Vasily Vereshchagin. Source: Wikimedia Commons   When Napoleon invaded Russia in June 1812, he had gambled on a quick campaign and hoped that a decisive victory would force the Russian Empire to capitulate. What happened instead was the beginning of the end for Napoleon’s French Empire.   The Battle of Borodino, fought on September 7, 1812, was a massive engagement. Each army consisted of well over 100,000 soldiers. The French, slightly outnumbered, managed to gain victory over the Russian forces, but the battle, the bloodiest day in the entire Napoleonic Era, cost the French so dearly that Napoleon’s campaign began to flounder.   The Russians managed to retreat in good order and employed a scorched earth policy, starving the French who were trying to live off the land. When Napoleon captured Moscow, he found an empty city in flames. The Russians had simply evacuated and prepared to fight on, ignoring established customs of how wars were expected to be won or lost.   With no option but to return home, Napoleon began his retreat, losing hundreds of thousands of personnel in the process. The retreat broke the back of French military might and set the stage for Napoleon’s defeat and exile.   Referring to the Battle of Borodino, Napoleon stated, “The French showed themselves worthy of victory and the Russians of being invincible.”   7. The Battle of Leipzig (1813) The Battle of the Nations Monument in Leipzig. Source: BonAlex / Wikimedia Commons   Also known as the Battle of the Nations, the Battle of Leipzig was the largest battle in European history before the First World War. By mid-1813, Napoleon’s situation in Europe was dire. Defeated by the Russians, he retreated back to France. With the Spanish, Portuguese, and British under the command of Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, having defeated the French in Iberia, and with Prussia having thrown off the yoke of French control, Napoleon’s ambitions were in shatters. Enemies were advancing on all fronts, and he desperately gathered together an army to counter the threat.   Napoleon launched an offensive in Germany but failed to capture Berlin. Coalition forces threatened to cut French lines of communication, and Napoleon found himself having to concentrate his army in and around Leipzig.   These efforts resulted in the massive Battle of Leipzig, fought from October 16 to 19. It was a monumental clash in which almost 200,000 soldiers from France, Saxony, Württemberg, Poland, Italy, and Naples faced off against around 350,000 soldiers from Russia, Prussia, Austria, Sweden, and Mecklenburg-Schwerin.   Poniatowski’s Last Charge at Leipzig by Richard Caton Woodville Jr., 1912. Source: Wikimedia Commons   The French initially beat back attacks from the south and the north but failed to inflict a decisive blow to the Coalition armies, which increased in size as reinforcements continued to arrive. Napoleon realized his only option was to retreat, but this did not go according to plan. With only a single bridge to funnel the entire army westwards out of Leipzig, the scene was chaotic.   While in retreat, a corporal blew up the bridge prematurely and trapped 30,000 rearguard French troops in the city. Ultimately, both sides took around 60,000 to 80,000 casualties, and the French lost complete control east of the Rhine.   The outcome was a decisive defeat for the French and their allies. The Confederation of the Rhine was dissolved soon after, and with forces of the Sixth Coalition pressing in on Paris, Napoleon abdicated in May 1814. He was exiled to the island of Elba in the Mediterranean.   8. The Battle of Waterloo (1815) A cuirassier and other re-enactors at Waterloo, 2011. Source: Myrabella / Wikimedia Commons   Napoleon’s most famous battle was also his last. After escaping from Elba on February 26, 1815, he returned to France. Despite not knowing how he would be received, the risk paid off, and French troops rallied around him. Alarmed at these events, European powers united as the Seventh Coalition to stop Napoleon.   The Battle of Waterloo took place on Sunday, June 18, 1815. Two days earlier, Napoleon had defeated the Prussians at Ligny while Michel Ney fought the Seventh Coalition to an inconclusive standstill at Quatre-Bras.   At Waterloo, the French army, numbering around 73,000, faced off against British, Dutch, and Hanoverian troops, as well as troops from the Duchy of Brunswick and the Duchy of Nassau. Under the command of the Duke of Wellington, this army of 68,000 soldiers took defensive positions and attempted to hold off the French until the Prussians, with an army of 50,000, could arrive to reinforce the Coalition forces.   Napoleon hoped to break Wellington’s lines and achieve victory before the Prussians arrived. Meanwhile at Wavre, the Prussian rearguard was fighting a blocking action to prevent 33,000 French troops under the command of Emmanual Grouchy from reinforcing Napoleon’s army at Waterloo. This action was successful, diminishing Napoleon’s chances of success.   At Waterloo, the Coalition lines held against a relentless French onslaught, and just as it looked as if their lines would break, the Prussians arrived, dashing all hopes of a French victory.   Napoleon abdicated and was sentenced to live out the rest of his days on the island of St. Helena in the Atlantic. This time, there was no chance of ever escaping.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

Anne Frank: Her Life, Death, and Legacy Explained
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Anne Frank: Her Life, Death, and Legacy Explained

  On August 4, 1944, a group of German soldiers stormed into the premises of the Frank family’s business in Amsterdam. During the search, the soldiers discovered a secret annex behind a bookcase, arresting the eight people who had been hiding there for two years. Among them was the 15-year-old Anne Frank. Before her capture, Anne documented her life as a young Jewish girl in the Nazi-occupied Netherlands in a diary. After her death, her father published Anne’s diary. It soon became one of the most famous accounts of the Holocaust.   Who Was Anne Frank? Anne Frank at her desk during her last year at the Montessori School, photographer unknown, 1940. Source: Anne Frank House, Amsterdam   On June 12, 1942, Anne Frank, then a 13-year-old teenager, penned her first diary entry. “I hope I will be able to confide everything to you, as I have never been able to confide in anyone, and I hope you will be a great source of comfort and support,” wrote Anne. She had received the plaid diary as a birthday present. By that time, Anne Frank had been living in Amsterdam for more than ten years.   Like many other German Jews, Otto Frank had decided to leave Germany after Adolf Hitler seized power in 1933. Otto, the son of a wealthy bank owner, had briefly worked in Amsterdam after the end of World War I. In the face of economic hardships and growing Nazi antisemitism, he and his wife Edith hoped that their family would find safety in the Netherlands, a country that had maintained its neutrality during the war.   The Frank family in Amsterdam (from left to right: Margot, Otto, Anne, and Edith), 1941. Source: Swiss National Museum, Château de Prangins/© Anne Frank Fonds Basel   After establishing his business, Otto brought his wife and two young daughters to Amsterdam in early 1933. While his pectin firm, Opekta, initially struggled to take off, Anne and Margot, her older sister, soon felt at home in the new country. Anne was enrolled at the capital’s Montessori school, where she learned Dutch and made new friends.   Anne, a lively and extroverted teenager, described in her diary entries her (mis)adventures at school, where she often got in trouble for talking too much. “Mr. Keesing … was mad at me for the longest time because I talked so much. After several warnings, he assigned me extra homework. An essay on the subject ‘A Chatterbox,’” she confided to her imaginary friend Kitty.   Outside school, Anne also enjoyed playing ping-pong with her friends and going to ice cream parlors, where the teenagers would usually “manage to find a few generous young men of our acquaintance or an admirer to offer us more ice cream than we could eat in a week.”   Anne’s life suddenly changed in the summer of 1942 when her sister received a letter from the Nazi authorities informing her she would be deported to a work camp in Germany. Suspicious of the Nazis’ real intentions, Anna’s family went into hiding.   When Was Anne Frank Born? Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, and Paul von Hindenburg celebrate Potsdam Day, the reopening of the Reichstag after the fire. Photos from the special edition of the Berliner Illustrierte Zeitung, March 21, 1933. Source: Lebendiges Museum Online/Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin   Despite her attempts to enjoy her time with friends and family, Anne was well aware of the Third Reich’s antisemitic persecution. “Our lives were not without anxiety, since our relatives in Germany were suffering under Hitler’s anti-Jewish laws,” she wrote in June 1942.   Born on June 12, 1929, in Frankfurt am Main, Anne was only four years old when Adolf Hitler became chancellor of Germany, introducing increasingly harsh antisemitic measures. In 1938, following the nationwide anti-Jewish pogrom known as Kristallnacht, two of her maternal uncles immigrated to the United States.   While German Jews faced widespread persecution, Anne and her family were initially able to lead normal lives in Amsterdam. Their freedom lasted until 1940, when Germany invaded the Netherlands. On May 14, the Dutch army surrendered to the seemingly unstoppable Wehrmacht. In the following months, the Nazi-controlled government, led by Arthur Seyss Inquart, introduced the Third Reich’s antisemitic legislation in the newly occupied country.   A poster of the Nuremberg Laws, 1935. Source: Lebendiges Museum Online/Deutsches Historisches Museum, Berlin   “Our freedom was severely restricted by a series of anti-Jewish decrees,” recalled Anne in her diary, listing all the restrictions the Nazi authorities used to exclude Jews from Dutch society: “Jews were required to wear a yellow star; Jews were required to turn in their bicycles; Jews were forbidden to use street-cars; Jews were forbidden to ride in cars, even their own; … Jews were forbidden to attend theaters, movies or any other forms of entertainment; … Jews were forbidden to visit Christians in their homes.”   As a result of the antisemitic laws, Otto Frank was no longer allowed to own a business. To prevent the Nazi authorities from seizing his company, he transferred ownership of the firm to a non-Jewish friend. Meanwhile, the occupying forces began to round up Dutch Jews to deport them to concentration camps.   Fearing for his family’s safety, Otto started devising a plan. “A few days ago, as we were taking a stroll around our neighborhood square, Father began to talk about going into hiding,” wrote Anne on July 5, 1942. “Oh, may these somber words not come true for as long as possible,” she commented. Despite her hopes, Anne annotated the following diary entry from her hiding place three days later.   What Happened to Anne Frank? Reconstruction of Anne Frank’s desk in the room of the Secret Annex she shared with Fritz Pfeiffer, Allard Bovenberg, 1999. Source: Anne Frank Stichting, Amsterdam   The Frank family went into hiding on July 6, 1942. “So there we were, Father, Mother and I, walking in the pouring rain, each of us with a schoolbag and a shopping bag filled to the brim with the most varied assortment of items,” recalled Anne in her diary entry addressed to her imaginary friend Kitty.   Before resorting to hiding his family in a “secret annex” of his company at Prinsengracht 263, Otto had tried to emigrate to the United States. However, low immigration quotas, red tape, and the destruction of the American consulate during the bombardment of Rotterdam thwarted his efforts. Even the connections of his friend Nathan Strauss, a US politician whom Otto had befriended at Heidelberg University, could not expedite the Franks’ visa application.   When Otto made a last desperate attempt to reach the US via Cuba, it was already too late, as the American government had suspended all transatlantic traffic following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. As a result, in the spring of 1942, Otto began furbishing the “secret annex.” Before going into hiding, the Frank family left behind a false trail, leading the Nazi authorities to believe they had escaped to Switzerland.   Shortly after they had moved to the annex, Hermann van Pels, Otto’s business partner, and his family joined the Franks in the secret apartment. In November 1942, Fritz Pfeffer, a Jewish dentist, also hid in Otto’s business premises. A group of non-Jewish friends, including Miep Gies (Otto’s secretary), helped them by bringing them food and other supplies.   Anne Frank House, the former headquarters of Otto’s firm Opekta, on Prinsengracht 263, Massimo Catarinella, 2009. Source: Wikimedia Commons   While hiding, Anne continued to record her daily life and observations in her diary. Alternating between fear and optimism about the future, the teenager described her frustration about the lack of privacy, her crush on Peter van Pels, impressions about her emerging sexuality, and reflections on personal growth. The forced proximity often led to arguments between the eight inhabitants of the secret annex. In her diary, Anne also wrote about her frequent clashes with her mother and sister.   While the group was physically cut off from the outside world, the “helpers” (as Anne called them in her diary) and their illegal radio allowed them to be informed about the war and persecution happening in Europe. “It’s really a wonder that I haven’t dropped all my ideals. … Yet, I keep them because despite everything I still believe that people are really good at heart. I simply can’t build up my hopes on a foundation consisting of confusion, misery, and death, I see the world gradually being turned into a wilderness, I hear the ever approaching thunder, which will destroy us, too,” mused Anne in July 1944.   Passport photo of Anne Frank, her last known photo, May 1942. Source: Wikimedia Commons/Anne Frank House photo collection, Amsterdam   On August 4, 1944, Anne’s worst fear came true. A group of soldiers led by SS-Hauptscharführer Karl Josef Silberbauer burst into the building. During their search, the officers discovered the secret annex behind a revolving bookcase. “​​Suddenly someone came running up the stairs and then the door opened and there was a man right in front of us with a pistol in his hand. Downstairs they were all gathered. My wife, the children, and the Van Pels family all stood there with their hands up in the air,” later recalled Otto.   The Franks, van Pels, and Fritz Pfeffer were all arrested. When the Nazi officers hastily packed their valuables in suitcases, Anne’s diary and assorted papers were left behind, scattered on the floor. Two helpers were also arrested.   How & When Did Anne Frank & Her Family Die? A reconstructed barrack at the Westerbork camp in the Netherlands. Source: Wikimedia Commons   After their arrest, Anne and the others were questioned by the Nazi Secret Service, the Sicherheitsdienst or SD, and transferred to the transition camp of Westerbork. On September 3, 1944, the Franks, van Pels, and Pfeffer left the camp on a freight train bound for Auschwitz, a concentration and extermination camp in German-occupied Poland. It was the last transport to leave Westerbork during World War II.   Upon their arrival at Auschwitz, Anne and her sister were selected for manual labor. Her father was sent to work in a gravel mine. About 350 people who had traveled on the same train, including Hermann van Pels, were murdered shortly after in the camp’s gas chambers. In October 1944, the two Frank sisters were transferred to Bergen-Belsen, a concentration camp in northern Germany. Their parents stayed behind in Auschwitz.   Anne’s mother, Edith, died of exhaustion at the beginning of January 1945, a few weeks before the Soviets arrived at Auschwitz. Her husband Otto, who was in the sick barracks, survived. Because of his poor health, he did not join the other prisoners in the death march when the Nazis evacuated the camp. Otto was the only inhabitant of the secret annex to survive the Holocaust.   Peter van Pels died at the Mauthausen camp, where he was transferred as the Allies and the Soviets inexorably advanced toward Germany. His mother died while in transport to Theresienstadt. Fritz Pfeiffer passed away in December 1944 in the Neuengamme concentration camp.   Memorial of Anne and Margot Frank in Bergen-Belsen, Germany, Arne List, 2003. Source: Wikimedia Commons   Anne Frank died in February 1945, a short time before the liberation of Bergen-Belsen. She was 15 years old. The forced labor, cold weather, and poor hygiene caused diseases to spread among the prisoners. Anne became ill at the beginning of 1945.   In a 1941 letter to one of his brothers-in-law, Otto had mentioned that his family had been inoculated against typhus, as the vaccination was required to immigrate to most countries. In a tragic twist of fate, however, his daughters, exhausted by their ordeal, contracted spotted typhus at Bergen-Belsen. Margot died of her illness around the same time as her younger sister.   Who Betrayed Anne Frank? The revolving bookcase leading to the secret annex, Cris Toala Olivares. Source: Anne Frank Stichting, Amsterdam   When Otto Frank returned to Amsterdam after the end of the war, he was determined to discover the identity of the informant who had betrayed his family and friends. Otto and his wartime helpers were convinced that an anonymous tip had revealed their hiding place to the Nazi authorities.   Over the years, various people were suspected of having betrayed Anne Frank and her family. However, the Dutch authorities and researchers could never find any definitive proof against them. Officer Silberbauer initially claimed the SD had received an anonymous call regarding the people hiding in the annex. However, he later changed his statement. Otto Frank and the two helpers arrested in 1944 were also suspicious of Willem van Maaren, an employer of Otto’s company. However, the investigation against him was ultimately inconclusive. Similarly, no evidence could be found to corroborate the theory that Dutch Nazi Tonny Ahlers or Lena Hartog, the wife of an employee of the firm, were the traitors.   Journalist Sytze van der Zee and, more recently, Gerald Kremer, the son of a Dutch resistance fighter, claimed a Jewish woman, Ans van Dijk, had betrayed the inhabitants of the annex. In 1947, Mrs van Dijk was executed for her cooperation with the Nazi authorities. However, the theory remains unverifiable.   To this day, the events leading to Anne Frank’s and her family’s arrest remain unclear. In 2016, an international team established by the Anne Frank House concluded that discovering the secret annex may have been an accident.   How Did Anne Frank Become an International Icon? Anne Frank’s plaid diary. Source: Anne Frank Stichting, Amsterdam   After the liberation of Auschwitz, Otto Frank began searching for his family. During his journey to the Netherlands, however, he learned of his wife’s death. Upon his return to Amsterdam, he looked for information about the fate and whereabouts of his daughters, hoping they were still alive. Then, in July 1945, two Jewish sisters who had been in Bergen-Belsen with Anne and Margot told Otto about their deaths.   To offer some comfort to the bereaved father, Miep Gies gave him Anne’s diary, which she had retrieved from the secret annex. “The Anne that appeared before me was very different from the daughter I had lost. I had had no idea of the depth of her thoughts and feelings,” commented Otto about Anne’s writings.   While in hiding, Anne had heard the Dutch minister of education (in exile) exhort civilians to record their lives under the Nazi rule. Thus, Anne had started editing her diary, hoping to publish it after the war. Upon learning of his youngest daughter’s literary aspirations, Otto began to look for a publisher. In 1947, Het Achterhuis (The Secret Annex) was finally published in the Netherlands. Anne herself had chosen the title in 1944. Otto had omitted some passages where the teenager had written harsh words about her mother or mentioned her sexuality. Let Me Be Myself, Anne Frank mural on the NDSM wharf, Amsterdam, Eduardo Kobra, 2016. Source: STRAAT, Amsterdam   Anne’s story strongly impacted Dutch readers and was well-received by critics. In the 1950s, the diary was translated into English, French, and German. Titled Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl, the first American edition of the book was sold out after a positive review in The New York Times. In 1955, Anne’s story became a play. After the premiere on Broadway, it was staged in several other countries, enjoying widespread success. In 1959, the book was turned into a movie entitled The Diary of Anne Frank.   Today, Anne Frank’s diary is available in over 75 languages. In many countries, it is a core part of school curricula. As a result, Anne has become one of the most known victims of the Shoah. “The values invested in Anne’s life and work reflect larger developments in how people across the spectrum of nationalities, religions, and ideologies have grappled with the significance of the Holocaust,” as Jewish Studies Professor Jeffrey Shandler comments.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
2 yrs

Patrick Henry’s “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death”
Favicon 
www.thecollector.com

Patrick Henry’s “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death”

  Two-and-a-half centuries after it was first delivered, Patrick Henry’s famous quote, “give me liberty or give me death,” lives on in American culture as a symbol of defiance against British colonial authorities intent on oppressing the 13 colonies. From a speech at the Virginia Convention of 1775 in the presence of many prominent American independence leaders, Henry’s proclamation inspired greater support for the Patriot cause in the American Revolutionary War, with both immediate and lasting influences in the following decades.   Historical Context Print depicting the Boston Massacre, 1832. Source: Smithsonian Institution   Patrick Henry made his famous remark in the context of the buildup of anti-British sentiment in the decade following the French and Indian War (part of the wider Seven Years War). Intent on recovering wartime expenditures through taxation, the British Parliament passed numerous controversial laws in the 1760s that escalated tensions with its colonies. Namely, the Stamp and Townshend Acts of 1765 and 1767 respectively charged Americans fees for everyday items like newspapers, glass, tea, and paint. Calls by the radical organizations such as the Sons of Liberty to end taxation without representation soon led to an outbreak of political violence.   In 1770, the first victims of the American Patriotic cause were martyred when British soldiers opened fire on a crowd of protestors in Boston, leaving five dead. Labelling the event as the Boston Massacre, American leaders exploited the incident to drive anti-British sentiment. Three years later, protestors disguised as Native Americans boarded British ships in Boston Harbor, dumping an entire shipment’s worth of tea overboard in opposition to the Tea Act. Now known as the Boston Tea Party, the event inspired a further crackdown on the rebellious colonies.   In response to the Boston Tea Party, the British passed the Intolerable Acts, increasing economic and political backlash against northeastern colonies, while allowing British soldiers to quarter in civilian homes. Soon, colonists organized formal meetings to discuss the fate of America. After the 1774 First Continental Congress concluded in a boycott of British goods, the Virginia Convention of 1775 allowed early Americans, including Henry, to discuss plans for independence and military action.   Who Was Patrick Henry?  Print of Patrick Henry at the National Portrait Gallery by Jacques Reich, 1916. Source: Smithsonian Institution   Born on May 29, 1736, in Virginia, Patrick Henry was a self-educated lawyer. While a relatively unknown attorney early in his career, Henry soon gained widespread recognition as a fierce defender of colonial rights and talented orator by winning a legal battle against the British Crown in 1763. In a case now known as Parson’s Cause, the young lawyer successfully argued on the behalf of a colonial subject involving the Two Penny Act passed by the Virginia House of Burgesses and vetoed by King George III.   The Parson Cause increased Henry’s involvement in early political movements of the colonies, especially those supporting independence from Britain. Before the American Revolutionary War, Henry served as a representative for the Virginia House of Burgesses and as a delegate to both Continental Congresses, where his passionate speeches and logical reasoning helped decide the fate of the United States in its years-long struggle for freedom. Henry’s stirring quote, “give me liberty or give me death,” delivered at the Virginia Convention of 1775, made him one of the most eloquent promoters of American independence, but his contribution to the Patriot cause went much further than this slogan.   During the fight for independence, Henry was appointed as Virginia’s first postcolonial governor. During his term, Henry supplied the Continental Army and Virginia militia with state resources. Outside of war, Henry was a crucial contributor to Virginia’s Declaration of Rights, a document that greatly influenced the United States Bill of Rights shortly thereafter. Henry’s career as an anti-Federalist legislator and advocate for states’ rights continued until his death in 1799.   Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death: The 1775 Speech Patrick Henry delivering his famous speech, print published by Currier & Ives, 1876. Source: Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York   In March 1775, Henry travelled to St. John’s Church in Richmond, Virginia. There, some of the colony’s most influential leaders including Thomas Jefferson, George Washington, and Richard Henry Lee gathered to debate the latest British actions and how Virginia should respond to them. Henry’s rhetorical skills stood out during the meeting with lasting effects.   During his passionate “give me liberty or give me death” speech, Henry communicated several key takeaways to the audience of patriots. Logically anticipating the conflict’s escalation after years of tensions, Henry voiced how the American Revolutionary War was an inevitable occurrence for the colonists. He warned against the futility of seeking political solutions and called the colonies to arms through his famous quote.   Without taking proactive action, Henry suggested that hopes for American independence weakened over time as Britain mobilized its military resources to suppress the Patriots. By personally proclaiming a willingness to sacrifice his own life, Henry’s call to arms resonated with the overarching sentiment of the prewar era.   In addition to practical political and strategic considerations, Henry’s speech encouraged support for Patriot causes by appealing to God. Henry argued that American independence was a righteous cause sanctioned by God. This appeal, combined with Henry’s reputation, reasoning, and oratorical skills, made a lasting impression on the leaders of the early American republic.   Immediate Impact Commodore Esek Hopkins by Robert Pollard, 1782. Source: Smithsonian Institution   Henry’s prediction of the outbreak of armed conflict was correct. Just one month later, the American Revolutionary War broke out at Lexington and Concord with the shot heard ’round the world. As such, Henry’s message was excellently timed. As the news of war against Britain spread throughout the colonies, even eager Patriots understood that defeating the British and its world-leading military would be an immense challenge. Henry’s speech at the Virginia Convention acted as a rallying cry, encouraging volunteers to take up arms and join the fight.   Symbolic momentum through Henry’s words was desperately needed early in the conflict after British victories. Not only did the British secure victory in the first major engagement of the American Revolutionary War, the Battle of Bunker Hill, but the Redcoats occupied regions in Henry’s home state of Virginia following a decisive defeat of American militiamen in the Battle of Kemp’s Landing. Heavy losses through the Battles of Long Island, White Plains, and Fort Washington continued into 1776, leaving Henry’s words not only a symbolic gesture but also a tangible reminder that freedom cannot be achieved without sacrifice.   Aside from “give me liberty or give me death,” other war cries of early Patriot causes motivated colonial soldiers. Shortly after Henry’s speech in Richmond, Virginia, Continental Congress representative Brigadier General Christopher Gadsden coined the phrase “Don’t tread on me,” presenting a flag with these now-famous words to Commodore Esek Hopkins, the first and only commander-in-chief of the Continental Navy, in December 1775.   Impacts Later in the American Revolutionary War Cornwallis surrenders his sword to Washington by James Heath, 1807. Source: Smithsonian Institution   After sustaining significant losses early in the war, George Washington and the Continental Army finally witnessed a turning point in the war following its decisive victory in the Battle of Trenton on December 26, 1776. As a member of the Virginia Convention of 1775 alongside Henry, Washington’s bold tactical and strategic decisionmaking were the physical embodiment of Henry’s declaration. Instead of timidly accepting the worst after early British defeats, Washington’s surprise Christmas crossing of the Delaware River risked death for liberty, serving as a further symbol for colonial soldiers to witness Henry’s words in action.   With Henry’s rallying cry ringing in their ears, the Continental Army went on to defeat the British on both northern and southern fronts at battles of Saratoga (1777) and Cowpens (1781) respectively. By late summer 1781, Continental Army and its French allies pinned General Cornwallis against the blockaded York River and Chesapeake Bay, launching a sustained bombardment of the British garrison at Yorktown. Cornwallis finally surrendered on October 19, 1781, Two years later, the British formally recognized American independence in the Treaty of Paris.   While there is no way of quantifying how Henry’s famous quote inspired victory in the American Revolutionary War, the fact that the declaration echoes into the present day suggests that it was an effective battle cry that encapsulated the Patriot cause and inspired men to give their lives for independence on the battlefield.   “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” in the 19th and 20th Centuries General George Washington by H. Fiquet, 1800-1825. Source: Smithsonian Institution   Henry’s famous quote “Give me liberty or give me death” has echoed throughout the ages, and its impact was not exclusive to the American Revolutionary War. During the American Civil War, for example, both Union and Confederate forces used Henry’s words to support their competing justifications for war. During World War II, Henry’s words were used to inspire American soldiers to protect democracy while Nazi Germany occupied much of Europe and Japan targeted the United States Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor.   In more modern times, Martin Luther King Jr. routinely drew inspiration from Henry’s words to convey the struggle of the Civil Rights Movement. The civil rights activist often galvanized the pursuit of racial freedom by communicating his willingness to sacrifice himself for the principle of equality of all Americans regardless of their backgrounds, skin color, or character, a willingness that became an unfortunate reality upon his assassination in April 1968.   While Patrick Henry’s legacy is dominated by his famous “give me liberty or give me death” speech, it is important to note the politician’s other accomplishments. From his early career as a lawyer to lasting impact as Virginia’s first postcolonial governor, Henry’s contributions to the early history of the United States and its independence land him beside some of America’s most prominent Founding Fathers.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 yrs

Hegseth 'Proudly' Fixes 'Woke Biden Initiative': 'Troops HATE It'
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Hegseth 'Proudly' Fixes 'Woke Biden Initiative': 'Troops HATE It'

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced on Tuesday that he was fixing an initiative he said had gone "woke" under President Joe Biden's administration -- a move which prompted an object lesson in trying to meet liberals halfway. Hegseth announced an end to the Women, Peace and Security program -- described...
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 yrs

Suspected Tesla Arsonist Could Have His Stupidity Cemented in History After Crime Scene Message Goes Public
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Suspected Tesla Arsonist Could Have His Stupidity Cemented in History After Crime Scene Message Goes Public

Given the amount of security that Tesla dealerships -- and Teslas themselves -- have these days, thanks to leftist vandals and pyromaniacs targeting them because Elon Musk hurt them in the feels, you have to be pretty dense to even try anything. That's especially true when you consider that federal...
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
2 yrs

Trump Pounces as ABC Interviewer Issues 'Legal Note' About DOGE: 'How Do You Know That?'
Favicon 
www.westernjournal.com

Trump Pounces as ABC Interviewer Issues 'Legal Note' About DOGE: 'How Do You Know That?'

Supporters of President Donald Trump likely saw his Tuesday primetime ABC interview as a chance for retribution, given the network's past history with him. (To say that ABC has nakedly opposed Trump for some time now would be an understatement.) Critics of Trump likely saw this ABC interview as the...
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 70678 out of 142928
  • 70674
  • 70675
  • 70676
  • 70677
  • 70678
  • 70679
  • 70680
  • 70681
  • 70682
  • 70683
  • 70684
  • 70685
  • 70686
  • 70687
  • 70688
  • 70689
  • 70690
  • 70691
  • 70692
  • 70693

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund