Time to Speculate on Trump's VP Pick

The NY Times Interviewed a Real Sociopath and It Doesn't Make Me Feel Any Better About Them

White House Responds to Laken Riley's Murder - Too Little‚ Too Late

Genetics Study Spurs Cries of Racism

'Unhinged': Time Mag Claims Christians Self-Immolated to Protest the Roman Empire Too

Megan McArdle: Google's Gemini AI Said the Quiet Part Out Loud

My colleagues and I have built a robot composed of many building blocks like the cells of a multicellular organism. Without a “brain” or a central controller in the system‚ our robot‚ dubbed Loopy‚ relies on the collective behavior of all of its cells to interact with the world.In this sense‚ we call Loopy a robotic swarm. But Loopy can also be seen as a single robot since all the cells are connected; therefore‚ Loopy is also “a swarm of one.” This research could lead to adaptive robots that tailor their shapes and movements to their environments – for example‚ in environmental cleanup applications.Loopy is a primitive form of multicellular robot that is made of a ring of 36 cells. Each cell has a rotary servo – an electric motor that rotates a shaft with precise controlled angle of rotation – and sensors. Each cell reacts on its own without input from any of the others except for its two immediate neighbors. As the servos move‚ the angles between the cells determine Loopy’s overall shape.Loopy is free to morph into various shapes and exhibit a range of motions. But random shapes and motions are not useful. We were hoping something interesting would emerge from self-organization; that is‚ the spontaneous creation of order from disorder‚ without us telling Loopy what to do directly. It turned out that Loopy forms stable shapes that recover after Loopy bumps into obstacles.Loopy exhibiting spontaneous shapes and motions.Famed mathematician Alan Turing was interested in the idea of self-organization back in 1952. He even envisioned a ring of cells. Turing hypothesized the existence of chemicals that diffuse and react with each other‚ leading to the creation of patterns in nature like those on bird’s feathers and seashells. This self-organization approach using simulated chemicals enabled Loopy to form and transition between various lobed shapes spontaneously.Why it mattersEngineered systems‚ and robots in particular‚ are predominantly designed with a top-down approach‚ where human designers anticipate the conditions the system may encounter and plan ahead through hardware designs‚ software programs‚ or both. The problem is‚ the designers are not likely to be there when the robot encounters an unanticipated situation.This micromanagement approach in robot design is like giving kids a detailed manual when sending them to school the first day. A better way of parenting would be to provide general guidelines and feedback‚ and expect the kids to solve problems on their own. Similarly‚ a key motivation of developing Loopy is to unleash the power of bottom-up collective “intelligence” so Loopy can find new solutions on its own when a new situation arises; for example‚ finding the right shape for self to adapt to the environment.What other research is being done?The vision of programmable matter has been around for decades‚ yet tangible examples have been scarce. While researchers have explored complex shape formation through self-assembly or reconfigurable robotic systems‚ these often depend on predetermined shapes.Similar to Loopy‚ researchers have applied Turing’s self-organization concept to swarms of robots‚ such as the small‚ simple‚ autonomous Kilobots‚ leading to the emergence of complex shapes. However‚ unlike Loopy‚ the physical forces between “cells” are not used to influence the final shape and behavior of the collective.What’s next?We would like Loopy to develop more lifelike traits‚ such as navigating unforeseen situations‚ seeking out better conditions‚ acquiring resources‚ and mitigating threats. This vision extends to eventually enabling Loopy to perform tasks assigned by people‚ thereby bridging the gap between the open-ended creativity of self-organization and human guidance.The Research Brief is a short take on interesting academic work.Yu Gu‚ Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering‚ West Virginia University and Trevor Smith‚ PhD Candidate in Mechanical Engineering‚ West Virginia UniversityThis article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

King Arthur‚ the ruler of Camelot‚ champion of Britain‚ wielder of Excalibur‚ and seeker of the Holy Grail‚ is surely the stuff of legend. There are probably few in Western societies who have not encountered some aspect of his story through various media‚ from books to television shows‚ to video games and so on. But despite the power of this apparently timeless mythological figure‚ there is one question that has caused consternation for scholars and the public alike – was the legend of Author based on a real person?Unfortunately‚ despite there being many who believe there was a living‚ breathing king called Arthur‚ there is no historical evidence to support it.The legend of a storyTo be sure‚ the story of Arthur has not been static. It has gone through various transformations and revisions over the centuries‚ whereby more of the mythical features we recognize today were added. So to understand the individual from an historical perspective‚ we have to go right back in time.Save for a few scattered references‚ we do not really hear any mention of Arthur until the 12th century CE. In his The History of the Kings of Britain‚ the Welsh monk Geoffrey of Monmouth provides the first extensive account of this character’s life. According to Monmouth‚ Arthur’s story starts with a rather dark event when Merlin (another complex character with his own twisting legend) transformed King Uther Pendragon (certainly not a real person) into the likeness of the Duke of Cornwall. This was so Uther could spend the night with the Duke’s wife‚ Ygerna. During this night‚ Arthur was conceived in the stronghold of Tintagel.From here‚ Arthur grows into a powerful leader who inherits the British throne and leads his people in various epic and bloody battles against Saxon invaders. He later spreads his kingdom to encompass Ireland‚ Iceland‚ Norway‚ and Gaul‚ but is eventually murdered by his nephew‚ Mordred.There is nothing in this account about Camelot‚ Lancelot‚ the Holy Grail‚ his sword‚ or the heroic and chivalric knights who attended the Round Table. These features were all added later by authors looking to make Arthur fit with romantic ideas of their time. This was probably a good move too‚ as a sixth century leader would have likely been less “knightly” and far more brutal.Monmouth’s story cannot be construed as historical fact in any way. Even in his day he was criticized for fabricating elements while mixing together pieces from various Welsh poems and sources. As such‚ the Arthur we get is less a coherent individual and more like a soup of stories blended together.But what about the poems that inspired Monmouth; could they hint at a real person?Despite the dodgy grounds for the story of Arthur‚ there are some who argue that his narrative was inspired‚ to a lesser or greater extent‚ by some sort of fifth or sixth century leader who was captured in Welsh poetry.According to these claims‚ at the end of the Roman occupation‚ a leader emerged who led the Britons – who had mostly become Christian by this point – against pagan Saxon invaders‚ and this hero’s name was Arthur…maybe. For instance‚ in a poem called Y Gododdin‚ written sometime between 540 and 640 CE‚ a fallen soldier is likened to another heroic figure called Arthur. Presumably then‚ there was some contemporary figure who would have been sufficiently recognizable as to make this likening significant.  In another poem from the same period‚ the monk Gildas recalled how a hero called Ambrosius Aurelianus had led the Britons to victory at a sixth century battle known as the Battle of Badon Hill. However‚ a few centuries later‚ another monk called Nennius described a different warrior‚ called Arthur‚ as having led the Britons in this battle (and 11 others too). It is possible that Nennius’s account was one that inspired Monmouth’s later histories‚ though we cannot be sure.Does this mean there really was an historical character called Arthur? Well‚ some like to think so‚ but it honestly does not look like it. As mentioned above‚ medieval chroniclers loved to blend fact with fiction‚ and many of these accounts were created hundreds of years after the events they claim to describe. Still‚ there are many out there who hold a candle for the reality behind the Once and Future King. Unfortunately‚ history is yet to provide us with anything solid to base that hope on.

Scientists have a found new avenue that could lead to the development of a male contraceptive that’s both non-hormonal and reversible. Although only tested on mice so far‚ the researchers believe their “promising” approach could lead to human clinical trials soon.The discovery comes in the form of a protein complex that regulates gene expression during sperm production. In a recent study‚ scientists at the Salk Institute in the US treated male mice with an existing class of drugs‚ called HDAC (histone deacetylase) inhibitors‚ which can interrupt the function of this protein complex.Their experiments showed that these drugs temporarily blocked the mice's fertility. Importantly‚ however‚ their sex drive was not impacted‚ their testosterone levels stayed the same‚ and their fertility returned 60 days after stopping the drug.“Most experimental male birth control drugs use a hammer approach to blocking sperm production‚ but ours is much more subtle. This makes it a promising therapeutic approach‚ which we hope to see in development for human clinical trials soon‚” Professor Ronald Evans‚ senior study author from the Gene Expression Laboratory at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies‚ said in a statement.Like other approaches to male contraceptives before‚ this method works on retinoic acid‚ a nutrient that acts as a signal for sperm stem cells in the testes to turn into sperm. Retinoic acid binds to receptors in the cells to prompt the complex genetic process that turns the stem cells into mature sperm. For this to work‚ retinoic acid receptors must bind with a protein called SMRT‚ which then recruits HDACs to synchronize the expression of genes that produce sperm.Previously explored approaches simply block retinoic acid or its receptor to kill sperm production‚ but this can lead to various side effects because retinoic acid is needed for many bodily functions.Instead‚ this new therapy uses an HDAC inhibitor drug‚ which breaks the sperm production cycle with little apparent effect on the rest of the body’s function.“It’s all about timing‚” explained co-author Michael Downes‚ a senior staff scientist in Evans’ lab. “When we add the drug‚ the stem cells fall out of sync with the pulses of retinoic acid‚ and sperm production is halted‚ but as soon as we take the drug away‚ the stem cells can reestablish their coordination with retinoic acid and sperm production will start up again.”It seems like the promise of a male contraceptive pill is always “just around the corner”‚ but it never materializes. Even if this latest approach passes through all the usual regulatory hoops‚ it will still be some time until it reaches pharmacy shelves. However‚ there are plenty of scientists working on the case.While it's often questioned whether guys would want to take a “male pill”‚ there is some evidence that demand is there. A 2019 survey by YouGov suggested that one in three (33 percent) of sexually active men in Britain would consider taking a male version of the pill. Most of the hesitation among men came from concerns about its side effects‚ but as this study shows‚ scientists are making solid progress in addressing that problem.  The new study is published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The discovery of a vampire squid specimen from the Early Jurassic could help reveal the poorly understood ancestry of this unique species. The fact it was buried holding prey adds unusual additional insight into its place in the ecosystem.Vampire squid are not true squid‚ being more closely related to octopuses than the creatures they were named after. Members of the family can be recognized in the fossil record because‚ along with their eight arms they have two filaments‚ rather than the more substantial tentacles squid have. Nevertheless‚ they remain very poorly understood.Today‚ only one species of vampire squid survives‚ but for once this isn’t a reflection of humanity’s damage to the planet. As far as we can tell‚ there has only been one species for a very long time. More than a dozen ancestral species are known from times when they apparently lived in shallower waters‚ but they’re still enough to make every discovery precious.A discovery unearthed in Luxembourg in 2022 and dating back around 180 million years is even more valuable than most. It’s a species we have not seen before‚ now named Simoniteuthis michaelyi. It’s also unusually complete‚ with the hard internal part known as the gladius and the tops of all eight arms visible. It would have been 38 centimeters (15 inches) long.The gladius (hard mouthparts) of Simoniteuthis michaelyi as seen from different angles and represented schematically.Image Credit: Fuchs et al.‚ Swiss Journal of Palaeontology‚ 2024 (CC BY 4.0)Two fishes are close to the specimen’s mouth‚ apparently being delivered by the arms. The scientists who described the fossil attribute its death to distraction sinking. This occurs when marine creatures are too busy feeding or fornicating to realize they are sinking into waters so depleted in oxygen (hypoxic) that they cannot survive or escape.One author reporting this find previously described a case of distraction sinking involving two vampire squid of different species. One of these squid was feeding on the other when‚ it is suspected‚ both sank into hypoxic waters. Such waters were more likely to preserve a specimen. Nevertheless‚ the fact that such a substantial portion of ancient vampire squid fossils seem to have died in this process suggests it was something of a menace in the Early Jurassic. Vampire squids’ modern adaptation to hypoxic waters apparently came much later. Other cephalopods were prone to distraction sinking as well. At least partial traces of all eight arms are visible in the S. michaelyi fossil‚ but there is no sign of the two filament tentacles. Nevertheless‚ the team describing it are confident they have a vampire squid‚ not an unusual-looking octopus.As one of the oldest vampire squid fossils known‚ the discovery could shed light on their evolution‚ but so far‚ if anything‚ just creates more confusion. In particular‚ we don’t know when the two filaments‚ used by modern vampire squid to scoop up small organisms and floating detritus known as “marine snow”‚ evolved. This specimen provides no answers.The slab (A–D) and counter-slab (E–G) of the vampire squid fossil in overview and close-ups of important parts‚ and under UV light‚ including the musculature of the arms (C and D) and the preyed on fish (F).Image Credit: Fuchs et al.‚ Swiss Journal of Palaeontology‚ 2024 (CC BY 4.0)Given their origins as a breakaway from true squid‚ “taxa belonging to the vampyromorph clade should definitely display an arm crown consisting of either 10 well-developed arms‚ or eight arms plus a rudimental pair‚” the authors write. However‚ like most of the other ancient vampire squid fossils‚ neither can be seen in this one.The genus name honors Jo Simon‚ a volunteer at the Luxembourg National Museum of Natural History‚ while the species is named for the Museum’s director Patrick Michaely.Vampire squid have some of the worst PR in the animal kingdom. Even the scientific name of the surviving species means “vampire squid from hell”. Having managed the remarkable feat of adapting to live in near oxygenless ocean depths‚ they get unfairly lumped with not only the vampire name but a totally spurious connection to extreme capitalism.In truth‚ were you ever to encounter a living vampire squid they would pose no threat‚ let alone drink your blood or offer you an exploitative home loan. You’d probably have been crushed to death long before by the extreme pressure of their domain‚ but given their modest size they wouldn’t eat you anyway unless something else had dismembered you.The findings are published in the Swiss Journal of Palaeontology.