What exactly is Retrofuturism&;#63;

Award-winning journalist Alex Newman‚ author of the popular book ‘Deep State’ and the new best-selling book called ‘Indoctrinating Our Children to Death’‚ says the UN’s quest for total tyrannical control of your life is coming sooner […]

Chocolate chip cookies are some of the most classic treats out there‚ but why not give them a twist&;#63; This spice will change your cookie-making game.

First as hard tack‚ then rising with baking powder‚ and now available as fast food today‚ here's everything you need to know about biscuits in the U.S.

The situation is more accurately described as more people exiting certain blue states – for example New York and California – and heading to other states in general‚ may they be red or blue. In the last couple of years‚ large U.S. states where a majority of voters support Democrats – so-called blue states – have been losing population‚ while some large red states‚ where there is majority support for Republicans‚ have gained residents. An analysis of Census Bureau data shows that there are in fact some big movements of people from states currently defined as blue to those currently defined as red. However‚ as Statista’s Katharina Buchholz reports‚ the situation is more accurately described as more people exiting certain blue states – for example New York and California – and heading to other states in general‚ may they be red or blue. In 2005 and 2022 alike‚ those moving from blue states have been almost equally splitting up between blue and red states. Only their total number has been increasing‚ from 3.7 million or 2.4 percent of blue states’ population to 4.6 million or 2.7 percent of population in the given years‚ boosting migration to both red and other blue states.URGENT&;#33; Keep Alex Jones in the fight against the NWO&;#33; Please pray &; contribute at DefendJones.com today&;#33; Chart At the same time‚ migration from red states has not changed as much – increasing only from 3.3 million in 2005 to 3.6 million in 2022. As in blue states‚ the split of destinations has stayed almost exactly constant over the years‚ with red staters choosing other red states 61-62 percent of the time and blue states only 38-39 percent of times. This means that compared with the mid-2000s‚ blue states now transfer more than 500‚000 more residents towards red states annually (and about as many within blue states). Inflows from red states to blue states have only increased by a little more than 100‚000 per year in this time frame. So while it might be true that a high cost of living and a (perceived) low quality of life is driving people away from certain blue states‚ this is not driving them towards red states more than in the past‚ relatively speaking. Migration from abroad is also boosting U.S. populations. In 2022‚ around 1 million more people immigrated into the United States than left the country. International migrants had traditionally chosen larger cities in both red and blue states‚ but this type of migration has diversified over the past decades. While this leaves both states like Texas and New York with fewer (official) international arrivals‚ it has had a more detrimental effect in blue states that already suffer from domestic out-migration. For the sake of this analysis‚ states are assigned the designation blue or red based on their vote in the last three presidential elections. For comparability‚ the definition of red states and blue states was not changed for 2005. Colorado‚ Virginia and Nevada – where domestic immigration has boomed recently – would technically be defined as red states‚ not blue‚ in 2005. However‚ patterns of migrations for these states are consistent between 2005 and 2022 instead of changing upon their reorientation‚ also supporting the hypothesis that U.S. migration flows are relatively constant and dependent on factors like location and proximity rather than politics. BREAKING: Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Democrats Want To Kill Trump

Flights to the African nation can commence within 12 weeks‚ the Home Office has said. The British Parliament passed the Safety of Rwanda Bill on Monday‚ allowing Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to deport thousands of asylum seekers to the East African nation. The legislation‚ which faced strong opposition in the House of Lords and Commons over human rights concerns‚ will now become law‚ the UK government has confirmed. In a statement on Tuesday‚ the Home Office said the parliamentary approval marked a “major step forward” for Britain’s efforts to “stop the boats and tackle illegal migration.” “The Bill’s passing means the government can enter the final phase of operational planning to get flights off the ground to Rwanda‚ pioneering a new response to the global challenge of illegal migration‚” it said. Britain reached a five-year agreement with Rwanda in April 2022 for illegal immigrants to be sent to the landlocked nation. However‚ no flights have happened since the first one was canceled in June of the same year following intervention by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The scheme has also been declared unlawful by the UK’s highest court‚ which has deemed Rwanda unsafe for deportees. Late last year‚ Sunak’s government introduced the Safety of Rwanda Bill to promote the country as a safe haven for refugees and to block further court challenges to the plan. Conservative MPs had called for it to be amended to override laws that challenge the swift removal of illegal migrants crossing the English Channel. However‚ the UN and the British Parliamentary Committee on Human Rights declared the draft law illegal‚ claiming it would cause irreparable harm to the UK’s reputation. The House of Lords has previously supported a motion urging parliament not to ratify it.Our fan-favorite Turbo Force Plus is now 40% off&;#33; See for yourself the delicious one-of-a-kind energy boost infowarriors CRAVE&;#33; Read more ‘A violation of human rights’: Will the UK government get away with deporting asylum seekers to Africa&;#63; In response to the approval on Tuesday‚ the Home Office said the “landmark” legislation makes it “unambiguously clear that UK Parliament is sovereign and the validity of any Act of Parliament is unaffected by international law.” It also means that Rwanda will now be considered a “safe country for the purposes of relocating people‚ including in UK courts and tribunals‚” it added. According to the statement‚ “robust operational plans” have been put in place to deliver the first flight to Rwanda within 10 to 12 weeks‚ followed by multiple flights. The Home Office reportedly has a reduced list of 350 migrants who are believed to pose the least risk of submitting successful legal challenges against their deportation. Lawyers cited by The Guardian said they would file legal challenges on behalf of individual asylum seekers on a case-by-case basis‚ possibly removing them from a flight list. BREAKING: Marjorie Taylor Greene Says Democrats Want To Kill Trump