It later became a Talking Heads classic. The post The first song Talking Heads singer David Byrne wrote first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

Cakes and baking go hand in hand until they don't. You can steam your cake‚ in which case your stovetop and a Dutch oven will come in handy.

Which actor in the Marvel Cinematic Universe has the best taste in food and restaurants? According to Jeremy Renner‚ it's Iron Man himself: Robert Downey Jr.

Senator says he will force a drawn-out process to pass emergency funding for Kiev and Israel US Senator Rand Paul has warned that passage of an emergency funding bill that includes $60 billion for Ukraine aid won’t be a quick and smooth process because he won’t allow his colleagues to avoid a serious debate about prioritizing Kiev’s security over America’s border crisis. “I think we should stay here as long as it takes‚” the Kentucky Republican told CNN on Friday. “If it takes a week or a month‚ I’ll force them to stay here to discuss why they think the border of Ukraine is more important than the US border.” Paul’s comments came one day after the aid bill moved a key step toward approval in the Senate by clearing a cloture vote‚ meaning it can no longer be stalled through a filibuster. However‚ Paul and other opponents can slow the legislation’s advance toward a final vote by introducing amendments and demanding that they be debated. The bill can only be sped to a vote without further debate if all 100 senators agree to a fast-track procedure. Paul won’t likely let that happen. He has spoken out against prolonging Ukraine’s conflict with Russia and has been a staunch critic of Washington’s foreign military forays. The libertarian senator was one of 19 Republican lawmakers who called last April for a halt to “unrestrained” US aid to Ukraine and urged President Joe Biden to instead push for a diplomatic solution to end the fighting. The latest aid bill includes $95 billion in emergency spending‚ including $60 billion for Ukraine‚ $14 billion to fund Israel’s war against Hamas‚ and nearly $5 billion to help deter Chinese “aggression” against Taiwan and other Indo-Pacific partners. If it passes the Senate‚ it will require approval from the Republican-controlled House of Representatives before going to Biden for final approval.Save 40% on DNA Force Plus NOW! Try it today and see why so many listeners have made it an essential part of their daily routine! Seventeen Republicans joined with Senate Democrats in supporting the cloture vote on Thursday. The bill surprisingly gained Republican support after border-security measures were stripped out. GOP negotiators had previously demanded a crackdown on illegal immigration to help overcome opposition to further funding of Ukraine’s conflict with Russia. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has suggested that he may prevent lawmakers from leaving Washington for a two-week recess that was scheduled to begin this weekend‚ saying members will “keep working on this bill until the job is done.” The Biden administration confirmed last month that it had run out of funding for Kiev after burning through $113 billion in previously approved aid packages. Paul noted earlier this week that in addition to allotting an additional $60 billion in military funding‚ the latest bill includes $7.85 billion for the “lavish salaries of Ukrainian bureaucrats.” Alex Jones and David Icke discuss the future of AI technology with a caller on X’s Spaces named Adrian Dittman who sounds suspiciously like Elon Musk.

Auto dealer reportedly sharing images of new customers financing vehicles with payments that are as much as monthly mortgage payments A New York Fed survey published earlier this week indicated that‚ in the fourth quarter of 2023‚ auto loan delinquencies reached levels not seen since right after the Great Recession more than a decade ago.  As a refresher‚ the data from Tuesday by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York showed (read: ZH report here) the rate at which car owners are behind on their payments hit an annualized rate of 7.7%‚ the highest level since 2010.  “Delinquency transition rates have pushed past pre-pandemic levels‚ and the worsening appears to be broad-based‚” researchers at the NY Fed wrote in a blog post.  Given that we already covered this in a report titled Credit-Card &; Auto Delinquencies Soar‚ Especially Age Group 18-39‚ as well as other eye-opener credit reports in recent weeks: Banks Report Tighter Standards‚ Weaker Loan Demand But Some Improvement As Financial Conditions EaseStunning Collapse In Credit Card Debt Change As Average APR Hits New All-Time High … perhaps there is reason to believe an increasing number of households have hit the proverbial brick wall despite the Biden administration cheering ‘Bidenomics’ on legacy corporate media outlets. Introducing Next Level Foundational Energy from Dr. Jones Naturals starting at 30% off! This cutting-edge dietary supplement is designed to elevate your energy levels and support your overall well-being. The households who piled on insurmountable auto and credit card debt through the Covid era and the current high-interest rate environment are likely the folks running into financial turmoil.  An Edmunds report from last year showed the percentage of drivers with plus $1‚000 monthly payments jumped to an all-time high of 17.1% in the second quarter of 2023 compared to 16.8% in the first quarter. The reason is that the average amount financed for a new vehicle is around $40‚000‚ plus auto loan rates are at a generational high. “The double whammy of relentlessly high vehicle pricing and daunting borrowing costs is presenting significant challenges for shoppers in today’s car market‚” Edmunds’ director of insights Ivan Drury said last year.  This leads us to two posts made by X user Clown World. They shared what appears to be an auto dealer sharing several images online of new customers financing vehicles with payments that are as much as monthly mortgage payments.  One person purchased a 2023 Tahoe with $2‚550 monthly payments on an 84-month term!  Another person bought a 2023 Sierra 2500 Denali with $3‚000 monthly payments‚ locked in a 96-month term!  What a deal 😅😳 pic.twitter.com/r0Sjhma5gC— Clown World â„¢ 🤡 (@ClownWorld_) February 9‚ 2024 Here’s what folks on X said in response to the two posts: $288‚000 for a truck that will depreciate to 1/5 of that long before it's paid off.— Caballero 🏹 (@HughAkston0) February 9‚ 2024 Dude could be almost 1/3 of the way through a 30 year mortgage on an expensive house when he pays off his truck.— Branos (@thesonofbran) February 9‚ 2024 What’s with this trend of people posting their garbage “deals” at dealerships. Nice flex 😂— T M (@T_morgan61) February 9‚ 2024 The repo industry silently cheers.  Alex Jones and David Icke discuss the future of AI technology with a caller on X’s Spaces named Adrian Dittman who sounds suspiciously like Elon Musk.

Benjamin Netanyahu has directed his military to prepare for moving civilians out of Rafah ahead of a major ground offensive Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has ordered his military to make plans for evacuating over a million Palestinian civilians crowded into Rafah‚ the last remaining refuge for displaced residents of the war-ravaged Gaza Strip. Israeli troops are preparing to launch a massive ground offensive against Hamas fighters in the area. Netanyahu’s office announced the directive on Friday‚ saying the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) needed a “combined plan” for the mass evacuation of civilians and the destruction of the last Hamas stronghold in the Palestinian enclave. “It is impossible to achieve the goal of the war of eliminating Hamas by leaving four Hamas battalions in Rafah‚” the statement said. “On the contrary‚ it is clear that intense activity in Rafah requires that civilians evacuate the areas of combat.” The UN has estimated that around 1.4 million displaced Gazans have taken refuge in Rafah‚ located on the besieged enclave’s border with Egypt‚ since the Israel-Hamas war began in October. The city‚ which normally has a population of some 280‚000‚ has become the last so-called “safe zone” for civilians as the IDF levels much of Gaza in its hunt for Hamas fighters. The evacuation directive comes as the US and other allies step up pressure on West Jerusalem to reduce civilian casualties. The US State Department warned on Thursday that an Israeli military operation in Rafah without “serious planning” for protection of civilians would be disastrous. US President Joe Biden told reporters on Thursday night that the IDF’s operations in Gaza had been “over the top‚” marking his most pointed criticism of Israeli war tactics since the conflict began.Save 40% on DNA Force Plus NOW! Try it today and see why so many listeners have made it an essential part of their daily routine! Biden’s administration has refused so far to press for a ceasefire in Gaza and has criticized allegations that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians. About 28‚000 people have been killed in the territory since the war began‚ according to local health authorities. The UN has reported that 85% of the population has been displaced from their homes‚ and 570‚000 Gazans are starving. The war started when Hamas fighters launched surprise attacks against Israeli villages‚ killing more than 1‚100 people and taking hundreds of hostages back to Gaza. Alex Jones and David Icke discuss the future of AI technology with a caller on X’s Spaces named Adrian Dittman who sounds suspiciously like Elon Musk.

How is it not the biggest political talking point right now that since October 2019‚ native-born US workers have lost 1.4 million jobs‚ while over the same period foreign-born workers have gained 3 million jobs. One month ago we asked a simple question: at a time when the Biden admin is breathlessly taking credit for a quote-unquote “strong” job market‚ how is it not the biggest political talking point right now that since October 2019‚ native-born US workers have lost 1.4 million jobs; while over the same period foreign-born workers have gained 3 million jobs. How is this not the biggest political talking point right now: since October 2019‚ native-born US workers have lost 1.4 million jobs; over the same period foreign-born workers have gained 3 million jobs. pic.twitter.com/Z5HVWmQ24C— zerohedge (@zerohedge) January 15‚ 2024 A few weeks later‚ when the grotesque and ridiculous January jobs report hit‚ we reran the analysis to find something even more jarring. Not only were all job gains in the past year entirely thanks to part-time workers‚ but native-born workers plunged by a another whopping 560 thousand‚ bringing the two-month total drop to just under 2 million. This meant that not only has all job creation in the past 4 years been exclusively for foreign-born workers‚ but there has been zero job-creation for native-born American workers since July 2018 (don’t believe us? go ahead and check the data directly from the Fed). Well‚ little by little our observations went viral‚ and soon the fact that immigration has been the only source of growth in the US was picked up by everyone from unimportant people such as fake (or is it fax) economists such as Paul Krugman‚ all the way to the most important person in the world‚ (with all due respect to Dementia Joe)‚ the Fed chair Jerome Powell‚ and even the Congressional Budget Office. And that required an immediate propaganda response. So what does the propaganda blowback against this “biggest political talking point” look like?Save 40% on DNA Force Plus NOW! Try it today and see why so many listeners have made it an essential part of their daily routine! Well‚ let’s start with the NY Times’ pet Goebbels‚ Paul Krugman‚ who just happens to be the world’s most overrated economist who in 1998 said that “by 2005 or so‚ it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s”‚ concedes that “all of the increase in employment since the eve of the Covid-19 pandemic has involved foreign-born workers” (but because facts are “political” he mocks that “Trump and those around him clearly believe that immigrants take jobs away from native-born Americans”)‚ and then he proceeds to lose any last trace of credibility liberals may still have in him – since anyone who knows how to click on a hyperlink such as this one can figure it out on their own – when he claims that immigrants “haven’t been taking jobs from the native-born‚ who are more likely to be employed in their prime working years than they were before the pandemic.” Great‚ the only problem with that is if one also looks at the quality of jobs instead of just quantity‚ and finds that all jobs in the past year have been part-time jobs. Is that the quality of jobs Krugman believes native-born Americans are entitled to? Don’t answer that: it’s rhetorical. As we showed repeatedly‚ non-immigrant Americans have not gained any jobs in 6 years‚ so Krugman’s whole argument is one giant strawman. As for the employment rate among prime-aged native Americans being flat‚ all Krugman is confirming is that the population of native born Americans is falling just as fast as their employment‚ which in turn is keeping the numerator and the denominator more or less unchanged. At the same time not only are all new jobs going to immigrants (whether legal or illegal)‚ all of the US population growth is also due to immigrants (whether legal or illegal)‚ which last time we checked‚ is precisely what the Replacement Theory is all about. Perhaps for his next propaganda exercise‚ the Democrats’ favorite economist can answer this question: why are so many native-born Americans so terrified of having families and raising children in this Bidenomical nirvana where everything is so wonderful‚ and why is all growth‚ in both the labor force and population‚ left to immigrants (whether legal or illegal). Of course‚ he won’t do that‚ as that requires figuring out the true nature of the problem which would go against his ideology; and instead he will jump right to the propaganda conclusion which is what one would expect from a professional liar‚ namely that “Immigrants are really good for the U.S. economy — and nativists really bad.“ All this is short-run; add in huge long-run benefits from immigration in helping us pay for Social Security‚ Medicare and so on. Immigrants are really good for the U.S. economy — and nativists really bad 6/— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) February 2‚ 2024 Of course‚ if it was just Krugman doing the full court propaganda press we wouldn’t even bother with this response‚ but we were rather amazed to hear none other than the Fed chair bring the topic of immigration up in his 60 Minutes interview. Luckily‚ unlike the NYT ecomedist‚ Powell’s take was far more accurate‚ if much more sinister. For those who missed it‚ here is what Powell said when host Scott Pelley asked him why the return of immigration to the US after the Pandemic (when Trump locked down all the borders) was so important: PELLEY: Why was immigration important?POWELL: Because‚ you know‚ immigrants come in‚ and they tend to work at a rate that is at or above that for non-immigrants. Immigrants who come to the country tend to be in the workforce at a slightly higher level than native Americans do. But that’s largely because of the age difference. They tend to skew younger.PELLEY: Why is immigration so important to the economy?POWELL: Well‚ first of all‚ immigration policy is not the Fed’s job. The immigration policy of the United States is really important and really much under discussion right now‚ and that’s none of our business. We don’t set immigration policy. We don’t comment on it.I will say‚ over time‚ though‚ the U.S. economy has benefited from immigration. And‚ frankly‚ just in the last‚ year a big part of the story of the labor market coming back into better balance is immigration returning to levels that were more typical of the pre-pandemic era.PELLEY: The country needed the workers.POWELL: It did. And so‚ that’s what’s been happening. Two points here: first‚ whether he meant to or not‚ Powell just insulted a few hundred million native-born Americans who reportedly do not work at a “rate that is above that for non-immigrants”‚ i.e.‚ they are plain old lazy‚ and then there is the far more ominous insinuation: when Powell says that a “big part of the story of the labor market coming back into better balance is immigration returning to levels that were more typical of the pre-pandemic era‚” what he really means is that the reason why inflation has fallen so fast since peaking in June 2022 (at 9.1% YoY) without a corresponding surge in the unemployment rate‚ is because immigrants (whether legal or illegal) were replacing the jobs of those native American workers who were leaving the labor force! Or said otherwise‚ you have Replacement Theory to thank for the drop in inflation (i.e.‚ wages) which would not have been possible without the surge in immigration‚ which in turn is why native-American workers haven’t seen any job gains in 6 years! Which also explains why private worker wages have indeed tumbled in the past two years‚ even as government wage growth has exploded to an all time high. That’s right‚ Replacement Theory for thee… just not for the Deep State‚ which is taking all the benefits of sliding wages (thanks to Paco mowing your lawn again)‚ and pushing wages of government workers (i.e.‚ the Deep State) to an all time high! But while Powell’s attempt at spinning immigration (almost entirely of the illegal sort since that’s where the bulk of workers came from in the past two years) was at least grounded in truth – and is why the ominous conclusion of why all this is taking place emerged – the third and final propaganda shocker came from none other than the “bipartisan” Congressional Budget Office‚ which this week published its latest “Budget and Economic Outlook: 2024 to 2034“‚ and which not surprisingly for an election year‚ came out decidedly more optimistic than last year’s edition‚ largely due to a handful of ridiculous assumptions about the future US budget and deficit‚ which we will discuss in a subsequent post – some of the “highlights” are i) no recession for a decade‚ ii) unemployment rates peaks just over 4%‚ iii) inflation peaks at 2%‚ iv) discretionary spending declines drastically largely due to a big drop in Medicaid spending – yet even with all these ludicrous cherry-picked assumptions‚ US debt/GDP still rises to catastrophic‚ hyperinflationary 172% by 2054. Anyway‚ since it is an election year‚ the CBO – whose forecasts have been dead wrong and overly optimistic every single year this century – was tasked with coming up with some optimistic talking points for the Biden admin‚ like how many trillions in nominal GDP growth the US economy will add if it maintains the current course over the next decade‚ and it did as ordered. In fact‚ it did so well‚ that the WaPo’s favorite economic columnist and spin master‚ Catherine Rampell‚ was effusive in her praise of the CBO forecast on X (formerly twitter). To be sure‚ not even she could mask the fact that the US is on an unsustainable fiscal course‚ pointing out that “Thanks largely to those higher-than-previously-expected interest rates‚ CBO raised its estimate of net outlays for interest over the next decade by $1.2 trillion (or 11%)” (spoiler alert: outlays due to the soaring interest will be orders of magnitude greater). But what matters for this analysis is the CBO’s punchline‚ and what one item they goalseeked to get to their mandated economic increase. Can you guess where the bulk of economic growth comes from? Why‚ that’s right: immigration! Here is how the CBO’s labor force forecast looks like today vs a year ago. Why the surge? Well‚ as the CBO explains‚ higher population growth through 2026 is “mainly from increased immigration”‚ which “more than offset a decline in labor force participation due to slowing demand for workers and the rising average age of the population” – translation: more immigrant workers‚ fewer native-American workers. And that’s not all: according to the CBO‚ “a large proportion of recent and projected immigrants are expected to be 25 to 54 years old – adults in their prime working years.“ And there’s your Replacement Theory again‚ only this time with a beautiful spin‚ one which as the WaPo columnist was delivered by none other than CBO Director Phill Swagel‚ who writes that “as a result of those changes in the labor force‚ we estimate that from 2023 to 2034‚ GDP will be greater by about $7 trillion and revenue will be greater by about $1 trillion than they would have been otherwise.” From CBO Director Phill Swagel: "As a result of those changes in the labor force‚ we estimate that‚ from 2023 to 2034‚ GDP will be greater by about $7 trillion and revenues will be greater by about $1 trillion than they would have been otherwise."https://t.co/751mWoOqNL pic.twitter.com/xsJS0ROpPc— Catherine Rampell (@crampell) February 8‚ 2024 And so there you have it. One month ago we wondered how the surge in immigrant workers is “not the biggest political talking point right now.” Well‚ just a few weeks later‚ it is emerging as just that‚ and the propaganda response has been staggering‚ with establishment figures such as Krugman‚ who accuses anyone that believes immigration is bad as being part of the lumpenproletariat‚ which ironically is a Marxist term… “No‚ A.I. and automation‚ for all the changes they may bring‚ won’t ultimately take away jobs‚ and neither will immigrants. Don’t join the lumpencommentariat” – source … Powell‚ who accuses native-born workers of being lazy and claims that immigration is helping defeat the inflation that his policies unleashed… “… a big part of the story of the labor market coming back into better balance is immigration returning to levels that were more typical of the pre-pandemic era.” – source … and finally the CBO… “The labor force in 2033 is larger by 5.2 million people‚ mostly because of higher net immigration. As a result of those changes in the labor force we estimate that from 2023 to 2034‚ GDP will be greater by about $7 trillion and revenue will be greater by about $1 trillion than they would have been otherwise.” – source … all coming out in full-throated support of immigration (mostly of the illegal‚ inflation-crushing because wage-hammering variety). To be sure‚ many rational voices – even those of conventional economists – have come out to challenge these ludicrous assumptions and conclusions‚ but none of them will be heard because as it should be abundantly clear by now‚ immigration will be the decisive factor of the November election‚ and if the Biden propaganda machine can kill two birds with one stone‚ namely that (illegal) immigration is actually great for the US and will end up boosting the economy by trillions‚ all the better. And so‚ with the election still nine months ago‚ expect the topic of how illegal immigration is the greatest thing imaginable for the US‚ to dominate the airwaves of the liberal mainstream media which is also the most vocal propaganda channel available to the establishment‚ whose fate is now contingent on convincing hundreds of millions of Americans that all those tens of thousands of illegals entering the country every day thanks to Biden’s open-border policies are actually the best thing that could happen to them. Alex Jones and David Icke discuss the future of AI technology with a caller on X’s Spaces named Adrian Dittman who sounds suspiciously like Elon Musk.

Bloc’s environment leader has suggested that the money raised could fund more aid to Ukraine European Commissioner Virginjus Sinkevicius has proposed raising more money for Ukraine by imposing a special tax on Western firms that refuse to cut ties with Russia.  “We still have companies that don’t care and remain in Russia‚” Sinkevicius told Politico magazine in an article published on Friday. “Why don’t we talk about taxing them?” Sinkevicius‚ a Lithuanian politician who serves as the EU’s environment commissioner‚ warned that despite last week’s approval of €50 billion ($54 billion) in Ukraine aid from the European bloc‚ there may be a shortfall in funding to help Ukraine defeat Russia. Washington‚ Ukraine’s biggest Western benefactor‚ has burned through $113 billion in previously approved aid packages‚ and US lawmakers are balking at passing President Joe Biden’s request for an additional $60 billion. Liquidating Russian assets or taxing businesses that continue to operate in Russia are better options than leaning on EU citizens to close the funding gap‚ Sinkevicius argued. “I think it is very important to find sources of funding that would use as little as possible from the European taxpayer‚” he said. “We need to have a long-term plan here. Russia is biding its time‚ waiting for Europe and the US to get tired and for the populists to take over.” Sinkevicius made the comments as he traveled to Kiev on Friday to discuss plans to make Russia pay for damage caused to the environment during its conflict with Ukraine. “This isn’t just policy – it’s our pledge that Ukraine’s restoration will be relentless‚ and Russia will be held financially accountable for its environmental devastation‚” he told Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky.Winter Sun Plus is NOW 40% off! Boost your natural defenses with this powerful vitamin D3 and K formula! The Kremlin warned on Monday that anyone who seizes Russian property will face long-term consequences. Such confiscations would undermine “the foundations of the entire economic system‚” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said in response to a media report on a proposal by Belgium’s government to tap frozen Russian assets. More than 1‚000 companies have announced curtailment of their Russian operations or total withdrawal from the country since the Ukraine conflict began in February 2022. Firms such as Italy’s UniCredit Group‚ German retailer New Yorker Marketing &; Media‚ and France’s Lacoste continue to operate in Russia. Alex Jones and David Icke discuss the future of AI technology with a caller on X’s Spaces named Adrian Dittman who sounds suspiciously like Elon Musk.

Meanwhile‚ the BBC reports that the EU has also scrapped plans to cut pesticide use in half across the EU - which was to take effect by 2030 as part of the so-called "Green Deal." The European Commission has bent the knee to protesting farmers – and is dropping key passages in a proposal for a new 2040 goal aimed at cutting greenhouse gas pollution. According to the EU exeuctive’s plan‚ “all sectors” need to now contribute to the effort – but the previously mandated 30% cut to agricultural production between by 2040 is gone. The revised draft has also excluded a mandate for citizens to make lifestyle changes – such as eating less meat‚ and a push to end fossil fuel subsidies‚ Politico reports. Farmers’ protests have broken out in many countries across Europe in recent weeks‚ with the industry expressing discontent over the EU’s green policies. Some of the largest demonstrations have been in Germany‚ prompted by a cut to diesel subsidies. Brussels has faced calls from industry groups and some political parties to lay out a 2040 climate pathway that doesn’t ignite further anger.The EU’s plan is set to be presented on Tuesday and will recommend a 90 percent cut in total EU emissions by 2040 from 1990 levels — a suggestion in line with scientific advice.The updated version of the plan‚ which is still subject to change‚ framed agriculture in a more positive light compared to earlier drafts. The role the sector plays in the EU’s “food sovereignty” was also emphasized.Winter Sun Plus is NOW 40% off! Boost your natural defenses with this powerful vitamin D3 and K formula! “We need to make sure we have a balanced approach‚” said European Commission Wopke Hoekstra‚ who unveiled the revised proposal. “The vast majority of our citizens sees the effects of climate change‚ does want protection‚ but is also worried about what that implies for their livelihood.” Meanwhile‚ the BBC reports that the EU has also scrapped plans to cut pesticide use in half across the EU – which was to take effect by 2030 as part of the so-called “Green Deal.” The changes were spearheaded by the powerful center-right European People’s Party (EPP)‚ the political family of top EU executive Ursula Von der Leyen‚ and constitutes the EU Parliament’s largest group. “Our farmers deserve to be listened to‚” said Von der Leyen in a Tuesday meeting of Parliament. “I know that they are worried about the future of agriculture and their future as farmers.” EPP environmental spokesman Peter Liese said on Monday that the 2040 target for a 90% cut over 1990 levels was conditional on greater emphasis being placed on “positive opportunities” for farmers‚ and less on “new instruments that rather see the farmers as an enemy of climate policy.” That said‚ one EU official told Politico that reality is hard to escape – which is that the agricultural sector ‘could and should’ contribute to the EU’s climate goals. “Despite all the semantics in the [Commission]‚ there is an unequivocal Impact Assessment making a very compelling (business) case for an ambitious headline target and all sub-targets for sectors‚” said the official. Bipartisan Border Bill Gives Biden Dictatorial Powers‚ 2.3 Billion To NGO Human Traffickers‚ And Millions of Aliens Legal Status