We can't be complacent.

Hollywood promotes more white-bashing propaganda -- think Harry Potter but woke and racist.

A pro-vaccine doctor who administered thousands of shots has decided to blow the whistle and alert the public about a “major cover up” of “devastating side effects” including cancer and cardiac arrest caused by the Covid […]

Aldi has a success story that rivals other big supermarket names. Find out what features its supply chain has that set it apart from the pack.

Just when you thought crispy shrimp couldn't get any better‚ these are coated in nacho cheese Doritos and served with a zesty‚ creamy sauce.

Strawberry and whipped cream is a combination that's hard to resist. This Japanese sandwich is packable‚ snackable‚ and uses simplicity as its superpower.

A lawsuit filed on Friday claims Mötley Crüe drummer Tommy Lee sexually assaulted a woman in the cockpit of a helicopter during a trip from San Diego County to Van Nuys‚ CA‚ in February 2003.  The woman (“Jane Doe” in the filing)‚ an acquaintance helicopter pilot David Martz‚ thought she was going on a sightseeing trip around San Diego County. But when she arrived at the airport Martz told her they would be flying Lee up to L.A. instead. According to the suit‚ Martz and Lee drank‚ smoked marijuana‚ and snorted cocaine during the flight. The woman did not imbibe. Martz eventually ordered her to the cockpit to sit on Lee’s lap to get the best view. Feeling “immense pressure‚” she complied. That was where the assault (“forcibly groping‚ kissing and… attempting to force her to perform oral copulation”) allegedly occurred.  The woman claims Martz “merely watched” the assault and said nothing to her after dropping Lee off. Thinking it was an isolated incident and that police wouldn’t take her seriously she did not report it. However‚ it appears Martz‚ with Lee and on his own‚ had a history of drug and alcohol abuse and sexual encounters while flying.  Subsequently‚ Martz had his license revoked three times and died in a Cessna accident in August ‘15. The woman claims Lee’s assault caused her “great shock‚ distress‚ humiliation‚ shame and guilt.”  She is seeking past‚ present‚ and future damages‚ including but not limited to medical expenses‚ loss of earnings‚ and loss of earnings capacity.   The post Mötley Crüe Drummer Accused Of Sexual Assault appeared first on RockinTown.

"Hunter Biden knows he is in the political crosshairs‚" Politico reports. Hunter Biden is so terrified of prosecution and prison that he threatened to flee the country if former President Donald Trump retakes office in 2024‚ according to reports. Politico reported Wednesday that Hunter told family and friends he may leave the country to avoid prosecution if Trump is elected next year. Hunter currently faces up to 42 years in federal prison for tax fraud and gun charges in an ongoing investigation by Special Counsel David Weiss. “In recent conversations with family friends‚ he [Hunter] has worried that he might have to flee the country if Trump were to be elected president again‚” two people who spoke with Hunter reportedly claimed. From Politico:Survival Shield X-2 is now 25% OFF! Treat your body with super high-quality nascent iodine &; enjoy one of nature's greatest essentials! The younger Biden is facing new criminal charges and could soon be held in contempt of Congress after refusing to testify in a Republican-led hearing meant to impugn the reputations of both him and his father. Those closest to the president have grown more worried about the personal toll it is taking on the older man…Hunter Biden knows he is in the political crosshairs. In recent conversations with family friends‚ he has worried that he might have to flee the country if Trump were to be elected president again‚ according to two people who have spoken to him. He has also worried about the intense scrutiny that his family would face during the 2024 campaign — and went public in recent days with his own concerns about the toll on his father.“What they’re trying to do is they’re trying to kill me‚ knowing that it will be a pain greater than my father could be able to handle — and so therefore destroying a presidency in that way‚” Hunter Biden told the musician Moby in a podcast released last week. This comes as Hunter Biden defied a Congressional subpoena to privately appear before the House Oversight Committee to answer for his foreign business dealings. Instead he opted to deliver a speech Wednesday portraying himself as the victim of political retribution and claiming his corrupt actions were the result of his drug addiction. Hunter Biden moves the goalposts again: "My father was not financially involved in my business" pic.twitter.com/n9L3miu2h8— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) December 13‚ 2023 Trump mocked Hunter’s speech by repeating his infamous “Where’s Hunter?” jab on Truth Social. Hunter now faces contempt of Congress charges for ignoring the Oversight Committee’s subpoena‚ but the DOJ led by Attorney General Merrick Garland is unlikely to take action against Joe Biden’s son. Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds

The American UN veto on a Gaza ceasefire is a low point of wag-the-dog international politics. December 8‚ 2023‚ is a day that will live in infamy. The United States made history of the worst kind by using its permanent seat on the UN Security Council to veto a resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The resolution was advanced by the United Arab Emirates (a US partner) and supported by more than 90 member states. It also had preponderant backing in the global organization’s privileged “upper chamber‚” the Security Council‚ where 13 of its 15 members were in favor (while the UK abstained‚ abdicating its sovereignty to the US‚ again). The American veto directly defied UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. Not a natural-born rebel‚ the UN chief had deployed a rarely used procedure to promote the ceasefire‚ putting his authority on the line. Referring to Article 99 of Chapter 15 of the UN Charter‚ he already implied that “international peace and security” were in danger. His spokesperson was explicit that Guterres was making a “dramatic constitutional move.” While maintaining diplomatic balance by also highlighting the Hamas attack on Israel‚ Guterres’ letter to the Security Council depicted the catastrophic suffering of the Palestinians under the ongoing Israeli attack and concluded that “nowhere” was safe in Gaza. All to no avail. The US could not be swayed and maintained its de facto unconditional support for Israel‚ even while the latter is conducting an intensifying genocidal assault on Gaza and its civilian population. This is no longer up for debate‚ and is no secret either; Israeli leaders have repeatedly made statements that signal the kind of intent that is a crucial element in the crime of genocide‚ while their actions and those of their forces on the ground speak even louder than their words. The world has taken note. It took no special bias for the Palestinian leadership – the one derived from the PLO‚ as well as Hamas – to identify the veto as “disastrous” and “a disgrace and another blank cheque given to the occupying state to massacre‚ destroy and displace.” China and Russia have denounced American double standards and the “death sentence” Washington has handed down on future Palestinian victims of the Israeli assault. Amnesty International says Washington has “brazenly wielded and weaponized its veto to strongarm the UN Security Council… undermining its credibility” and displaying a “callous disregard for civilian suffering in the face of a staggering death toll.” Doctors without Borders did not mince its words either‚ accusing the US of standing “alone in casting its vote against humanity‚” with America “complicit in the carnage in Gaza” and undermining not only its own credibility but also that of international humanitarian law. VasoBeet is now 40% OFF! This beetroot-based supplement was created to provide you with all the benefits of this nutrient-dense vegetable in one easy dose! Craig Mokhiber – an authority on international law and former head of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights office in New York – tweeted that “on the eve of the 75th Anniversary of the Genocide Convention‚ the US has again vetoed a ceasefire in the UN Security Council… demonstrating its further complicity in the #genocide in #Palestine.” This list of censure and condemnation could be prolonged almost ad infinitum‚ especially if we add voices from the Global South. The key point‚ however‚ should be clear already: The US stands isolated and disgraced by its very own‚ easily avoidable – or so it would seem – decision. This was‚ after all‚ not a vote asking for justice and restitution for the victims‚ or – perish that radical thought! – for prosecution of the perpetrators. All this was about was the barest of bare minimums‚ just a ceasefire‚ not even a peace deal. Still‚ that was too much to ask of the US. Historians do not like to predict‚ but here’s my historian’s prediction: None of the above will ever fade or take on a softer hue. What the US did on December 8 will never appear “understandable” or so “complex” that decent people won’t condemn it. This‚ on the contrary‚ will provide a lasting example of what so many Americans profess to love: moral clarity. And that clarity will find an inexcusable‚ unmitigated‚ and‚ yes‚ evil act that will remain known to human history as precisely that. Future historians will ask how this happened. How could the single most powerful nation in the world‚ which claims to lead not only by force but by “values‚” side with the Israeli perpetrators of such an outrageous and open crime‚ while openly contravening much of the international community? Some will even ask the more cynical question how America‚ even if its elites are entirely bereft of ethics‚ could do so much harm to itself. The simplest‚ almost technical answer to that question has to do with a historical irony. America owes its veto power – as one of the five permanent members of the Security Council – to what happened in World War II. And while World War II and the German Holocaust against the Jews of (mostly) Europe are not the same‚ they are part of the same history. Much US pride has been invested in being among the powers that brought down the Holocaust perpetrator state Germany. And yet‚ here we are: The same US is now using that very veto not only to shield another genocidal state but to help it continue its crime. There are‚ of course‚ broader reasons for this great American failure. Many have been discussed before. Israel serves the function of an enforcer and imperial outpost in the Middle East and sometimes beyond. As current US President Joe Biden – by now often trending on X as #GenocideJoe – stated in 1986‚ when still an ambitious and pandering senator‚ if there were no Israel‚ America would have to invent one. Let’s set aside that even the callous realpolitik behind such thinking is flawed: If it ever was an asset‚ Israel is turning into a liability. Let’s just note that the American elite claims to believe that Israel is so useful that the commitment to it must be‚ in Vice President Kamala Harris’ words‚ “ironclad.” But so it was for Ukraine only‚ as it were‚ yesterday. And yet Kiev is about to be dropped‚ as so many US clients before. What makes Israel different? Clearly‚ it is the long-standing top recipient of US financial and military support. Is it sunk cost fallacy then? Is America so over-committed to Israel that it simply won’t walk away? Yet that hypothesis does not explain the striking one-sidedness of the US-Israel relationship. If there has ever been a case of wag-the-dog‚ this is it: One thing that the American veto on the Gaza ceasefire resolution shows is that it is Israel that is dominating US foreign policy‚ not the other way around. Otherwise‚ Washington would have sought to find a compromise between preserving its own credibility and interests by allowing at least this very modest resolution to pass‚ while still supporting Israel in multiple other ways. Clearly‚ one thing that is determining this American dependence on another‚ much smaller country is the massive success of lobbying and foreign influence operations on behalf of Israel. Indeed‚ it is Israel that has run the most invasive and effective such attack on US politics in history. And for the avoidance of any misunderstandings: Noting this obvious fact has nothing to do with “anti-Semitism.” Indeed‚ trying to smear those who dare bring it up with that accusation is part of how that influence operation works. It’s time to entirely disregard such cheap tricks. Add one piece of historical evidence: We know from the empirical record of the past that things can be very different‚ because they have been. Multiple examples could be adduced to show that America‚ for decades‚ used to be partial but not submissive to Israel. The most obvious case is Israel’s occupation of Gaza during the Suez Crisis of 1956. While this aspect of this failed Israeli (and British and French) regime-change war against Egypt is almost forgotten now‚ Israel also occupied Gaza for several months before being forced to leave (to return‚ of course‚ in 1967). Then as well‚ Israeli forces committed various crimes‚ including massacres of prisoners and civilians‚ as Israeli historian Benny Morris (by no means a friend of the Palestinians) has described in detail. But back then‚ under Republican President Dwight ‘Ike’ Eisenhower‚ the US had a foreign policy that could confront and contravene Israel. Moreover‚ Eisenhower’s harsh and decisive intervention against Israel and its European allies happened to be aligned with the Soviet response at the time. As a minimum‚ here was a tough‚ conservative American president (and of course ex-military leader of the highest rank) who was not so phobic about “the Russians” as to exclude any coinciding interests. If only we could return‚ at least‚ to a world where Americans could forget a little about their Russia obsession when thinking about foreign influence on their country and focus that concern where it matters‚ namely on Israel. If in addition they could think a little more about Russia as a viable partner – at least occasionally – in helping resolve severe international crises‚ we would all be much better off. We might even be able to stop a genocide here or there.

SPLC melts down over fact that Alex Jones and Infowars can now wage a "full-spectrum information war" on X not subject to censorship. Alex Jones has gained nearly a million followers in the days following his triumphant return to X‚ much to the horror of the mainstream media. The Southern Poverty Law Center on Friday lamented how quickly Jones amassed over 800‚000 followers since his reinstatement to X last weekend. “Twitter suspended Jones’s account on Sept. 6‚ 2018‚ and archives show Jones with roughly 900‚000 followers at that time. Jones initially signed up for Twitter in 2010. It took Jones eight years to reach 900‚000 – and in span of days‚ he nearly doubled it to 1.7 million‚” wrote Michael Edison Hayden. The @RealAlexJones account now has 1.8 million followers on X as of this writing. SPLC however‚ argued without evidence that the majority of those new followers could be “bots.”Survival Shield X-2 is now 25% OFF! Treat your body with super high-quality nascent iodine &; enjoy one of nature's greatest essentials! Musk has claimed that under his leadership‚ X is prioritizing the removal of “bots‚” software that impersonates human followers on social media platforms‚ but critics dispute whether anything has substantially changed since he rebranded Twitter. An August story from Mashable found that accounts with zero followers swarmed to Musk‚ composing over 70% of his follower count. It is unclear how many of Jones’s new followers are active‚ individual human users of X. Still‚ the increase of visibility buoys the career of one of America’s most notorious radical-right propagandists when he needs the help. A so-called “disinformation” expert warned SPLC that Jones returning to X “exponentially” expands his and Infowars’ reach‚ and completes a “full-spectrum information war” nexus with the likes of Tucker Carlson‚ whose show airs exclusively on X after Fox News fired him. “[Jones’s return] exponentially expands the reach of hate‚ harassment and incitement. But it doesn’t take a sociologist to connect the dots between Musk-Tucker Carlson-Alex Jones Redux‚” Joan Donovan‚ co-author of Meme Wars‚ told SPLC. “In so many ways‚ these men all need each other to represent a full-spectrum information war‚ where the public are all tuned into Channel Z‚ led by this alternative influence network.” Jones announced Wednesday a new show called Alex Jones on X‚ featuring his seminal documentary “Endgame: Blueprint for Global Enslavement” as his first episode. Episode 1 ALEX JONES ON 𝕏: @X Premier of Documentary 'ENDGAME: Blueprint for Global Enslavement' — PLUS Deep State Pushing Martial Law — MUST WATCH! pic.twitter.com/QnOxB9mbJo— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 14‚ 2023 This groundbreaking exposé against the New World Order has already garnered 3 million views on X alone. »» 𝘌𝘱𝘪𝘴𝘰𝘥𝘦 1 𝘕𝘦𝘸𝘴 𝘚𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯: ‘Deep State Pushing Martial Law’ If time is of the essence‚ this news segment offers a quick yet essential overview of recent events. pic.twitter.com/AkiewSlx7H— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) December 14‚ 2023 The mainstream media has been freaking out over Jones’ return to X now that they no longer have a monopoly on the flow of information online. Follow Jamie White on X | Truth | Gab | Gettr | Minds