Donald Trump announced he will sell snippets of the suit he wore for his mugshot

'Israel has a tough decision to make'

'Your mom buys you presents with the money she makes on OnlyFans'

This is silly!

'May she reset in eternal peace'

'Definitely plagiarism'

A major Texas police department is reportedly considering a proposal that would alter the way police interact with individuals who identify as LGBTQ‚ KOMO News reported Tuesday. The proposal would require officers in El Paso Police Department (EPPD) to ask for and use an individual’s preferred name‚ gender identity and pronouns during all interactions‚ according […]

Inflation is not your fault

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Media Matters for America‚ a pro-censorship online monitoring group is making some censorship accusations of its own. The organization has initiated a federal lawsuit against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. The lawsuit accuses Paxton of infringing upon the First Amendment within the context of a dispute involving Elon Musk’s X app. The organization alleges that this action noticeably impacted its operations‚ calling Paxton’s probe an illegal reprisal conceived to penalize it due to its reporting on ad campaigns found alongside controversial speech on X. We obtained a copy of the lawsuit for you here. Media Matters’ pressure on X advertisers created complications for Musk’s X platform‚ proving influential in causing a massive advertiser exodus‚ involving high-profile companies like Disney. Last month Paxton proclaimed he was launching an inquiry into Media Matters for suspected dishonest practices related to the probe of X. This declaration came at the same time that X leveled a lawsuit against Media Matters‚ accusing them of unlawfully meddling with their advertising relationships. Media Matters’ lawsuit did note that Paxton was among a group of “politicians and media figures” who quickly rallied to Musk’s defense following the reports by Media Matters. According to the complaint‚ filed on Monday‚ following Media Matters’ consequential reports about X‚ “Paxton issued a civil investigative demand (‘Demand’) to Media Matters‚ commanding it to ‘produce [] documentary material[s] and permit inspection and copying.’” The complaint further adds‚ “The Demand seeks a sweeping array of materials from Media Matters and [reporter Eric] Hananoki‚ including documents and communications about their research and reporting‚ their communications with possible sources at X and its advertisers‚ as well as sensitive materials related to Media Matters’s operations.” According to Media Matters‚ “Paxton’s retaliatory investigation and Demand are transparent attempts to punish Plaintiffs for their constitutionally protected speech and press activities‚ subjecting them to a baseless and arbitrary government investigation in a state to which they have no relevant connection‚ and demanding the right to rifle through their most sensitive journalistic and organizational documents and communication.” Media Matters alleges Paxton’s actions violate not just the First Amendment‚ but also the 14th Amendment’s due process protections‚ with their reporter shield laws in Maryland and Washington‚ D.C. encroached upon as well. The lawsuit also highlights that Media Matters is beyond Paxton’s jurisdictive reach as the watchdog is based in Washington and does not undertake business in Texas as per the local business regulations. The post Media Matters sues Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton Over Investigation Into Its Demonetization Pressure appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Self Parody: Netflix Casts Denzel Washington As Hannibal